CR 98-72 Health InspectionApril 30, 1998
•
HEALTH INSPECTION
Proposed Action
Staff recommends that the Council approve the following motion: Move that the Hopkins City
Council approve turning over health inspection to Hennepin County.
Approval of this motion will result in Hennepin County and the Department of Agriculture
permanently taking over environmental health inspections in the City of Hopkins.
Overview
The City of Hopkins has contracted with Mr. Manny Roesler to perform health inspection services
for the City. Mr. Roesler is planning to resign May 11. The City must now determine how best to
provide environmental health services to its businesses and residents.
The City Council discussed this issue at the April 7 Council meeting. The Council continued this
item to give staff enough time to address several issues raised by the City Council:
The possibility of having a short term agreement with the County
Concerns about the licensing of vendors at City festivals
Concerns regarding the transition from the City to the County
The cost of County licenses
Primary Issues to Consider
Analysis of issues
Examination of the options for providing this service
es A. Genellie
ssistant City Manager
Supporting Information
City of New Hope Memo and Letter to licensees.
Comments from other cities regarding Hennepin County Health Services
Comparison of Hennepin County license fees and the City of Hopkins fees
Council Report 98 -072
Council Report 98 -072 2
Analysis of the Issues
The possibility of having a short term agreement with the County
Technically, in order for Hennepin County to take over health inspections in the City of
Hopkins, the City must first give back to the State of Minnesota its authority to perform these
inspections. The State then delegates the program to Hennepin County. The State has a rule
that once a city relinquishes its health inspection program it cannot get it back. Susan
Palchick, Hennepin County Health Services, called the State of Minnesota to request a waiver
from this rule. The State of Minnesota refused to grant this waiver. Hennepin County itself is
unwilling to enter into a contractual relationship with the City of Hopkins.
Therefore, if the City goes with Hennepin County it will not be able to get this duty back again.
Concerns about the licensing of vendors at City festivals
The City of Hopkins currently licenses all vendors at City festivals. The City licensed 22
vendors during the 1997 Raspberry Festival. They are required to fill out a form for the City
indicating that they are licensed by either Hennepin County or the State of Minnesota and pay
a fee of $25.00. If the City turned over its health inspection program to the County, some
vendors would actually have less paperwork to do. Hennepin County licenses the vendors for
Robbinsdale's city festivals. The city of Robbinsdale reports that they have not received any
complaints. Hennepin County does not charge a fee to non - profit organizations.
Concerns regarding the transition from the City to the County
One of the issues that was raised was the possible transition from City inspections to County
inspections. Attached are some documents from New Hope indicating how the transition was
handled there. These transition issues would also exist if the City of Hopkins contracted with
another city.
The cost of County licenses
Staff provided the City Council with a comparison between City fees and County fees.
Unfortunately the County numbers that the staff provided to the Council were not accurate. A
revised comparison is attached.
Hopkins has three options to consider:
1. Contract with another part -time health inspector for Hopkins;
2. Enter into an arrangement with another city to have their health inspectors serve both cities;
or
3. Get out of the health inspections business altogether and have Hennepin County and the
Department of Agriculture perform the service for the City.
Council Report 98 -072 3
Option 1
The City could contract with another individual health inspector and retain environmental health
services entirely within its own jurisdiction. Both the City and Mr. Roesler have made some
informal attempts to learn if there is anyone who would be interested in contracting with the City.
As of this date no one has indicated any interest.
The advantages of contracting with an environmental health services inspector are that the service
and accountability remain at the municipal level.
The disadvantages include:
the possibility that it will be difficult to contract with a qualified individual;
any single individual may not have the knowledge or experience to deal with all aspects of
health inspections;
this service will continue to incur administrative costs in processing licenses and dealing with
complaints.
Option 2
The second option would be to contract with another city to perform health inspections for
Hopkins. In recent talks with St. Louis Park and Minnetonka, both cities have indicated an interest
in contracting with the City of Hopkins. St. Louis Park has indicated that they would provide an
inspector one day a week at an annual cost of approximately $15,000. Minnetonka has not
provided a detailed response.
The advantages with contracting with another city include:
If the City of Hopkins was not satisfied with the service it could, as some future time, take back
the health inspection duties;
The City of Hopkins would have some influence on how the inspections were performed
although the inspectors would, of course, be working for another city.
The disadvantages include:
The City of Hopkins would still be responsible for issuing licenses and collecting fees;
Complaints regarding service would be made to the City of Hopkins but City staff would be
unable to take direct action to resolve complaints since the inspectors work for another city.
The City of Hopkins would have to mediate any complaints.
Council Report 98 -072 4
Option 3
The final option that the City has is to relinquish control of environmental health services to
Hennepin County. The County would assume all responsibilities for inspections, plan reviews,
licensing, fee collection, public education, and emergency outbreak responses. The County would
perform the service at no cost to the City.
Recent evaluations by the State of Minnesota indicate that Hennepin County's program is
consistently ranked higher than most city programs.
Program Evaluations
% of High Risk
Food Food Facilities Lodging
Service Inspected Program
Edina
1994 85.29%
1989 73.25%
Hennepin County
1997 84.08%
1992 83.40%
1988 79.80%
Hopkins
1995 77.58%
1991 72.72%
Minnetonka
1997
1994 82.48%
1989 77.09%
St. Louis Park
1997
1993 80.85%
State of MN Average
1995 77.70%
1994 76.60%
1992 75.20%
90.80%
70.00%
89.00%
92.18% 96.00%
91.00%
93.71%
90.20%
95.00%
91.86%
MN Statute 157.20, Subd. 2a. Risk categories.
(a) High -risk establishment. "High -risk establishment"
means any food and beverage service establishment,
hotel, motel, lodging establishment, or resort that:
(1) serves potentially hazardous foods that require
extensive processing on the premises, including
manual handling, cooling, reheating, or holding
for service;
(2) prepares foods several hours or days before
service;
(3) serves menu items that epidemiologic experience
has demonstrated to be common vehicles of
food -borne illness;
(4) has a public swimming pool; or
(5) draws its drinking water from a surface water supply.
Their interest in performing environmental health services for Hopkins is to increase the continuity
of service in Hennepin County. Currently, the County performs environmental health services in 35
cities and for the Metropolitan Airport Commission. Staff has obtained reports from the cities of
Maple Grove, Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale, and Plymouth. All cities are satisfied with the level of
service they receive from Hennepin County and all remarked on the cost savings. Hennepin
County will accommodate requests for custom reports on a weekly, monthly, or quarterly basis,
depending on each city's needs.
Council Report 98 -072 5
All of the County's staff are registered sanitarians. In addition the County has ongoing education
programs for owners and operators of food, beverage, lodging, and swimming pool facilities.
The advantages with turning this service over to the County include:
the County has the staff and expertise to best perform these inspections
the County can provide training to businesses
elimination of this service will free up staff time to concentrate on the core services the City
must provide
The disadvantages include:
higher fees for some businesses
once this service is turned over to the County it cannot be returned to the City of Hopkins
Alternatives
1. Contract with another individual to provide health inspection services.
2. Authorize staff to enter into negotiations with another city to provide health inspection services.
3. Turn over health inspection to Hennepin County and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture.
Staff recommends Alternative 3 for the following reasons:
The County has the staff and expertise to best perform these inspections and thereby protect
the health and safety of people who live and shop in Hopkins; and
Elimination of this service will free up staff time to concentrate on the core services the City
must provide.
Memo
To: Dan Donahue, City Manager
Larry Watts, Director of Finance and Administration
Jeanine Clancy, Director of Public Works
Shari French, Director of Parks and Recreation
Doug Smith, Director of Fire and Safety
Colin Kastanos, Director of Police
Valerie Leone, City Clerk
Jean Coone, General Inspector
Randy Kurtz, Fire Inspector
Doug Sandstad, Building Official
Sue Henry, Community Development Specialist
Pam Sylvester, Department Secretary, Community Development
Marge Runnako, Department Secretary, Fire and Safety
Lorraine Kloss, Department Secretary, Finance and Administration
From: Jacquie Cavanagh, Administrative Analyst
Kirk McDonald, Director of Community Development
Date: February 12, 1998
Re: Status of Environmental Health Inspections
City of New Hope
The environmental health inspections implementation is progressing on schedule. In an effort to keep
everyone abreast of what's going on, I will summarize actions to date and what actions are pending
full implementation.
What change occurred?
On January 12, 1998, the City Council elected to relinquish control over municipal environmental
health inspections. What the Council actually did was give back its authority to the State of
Minnesota, not Hennepin County. The City Manager subsequently sent a letter to State Department
of Health (MDH) informing the Manager of Environmental Health Services of the Council's action.
As a result of the Council's action, this agency is now responsible for environmental health inspections
in the City of New Hope. However, MDH personnel will not be providing environmental health services
for the City. Instead, they will delegate this responsibility to Hennepin County.
• Page 1
How will inspection services continue?
City staff met with Hennepin County on January 23 to discuss the changes that will be taking place.
We discussed what services Hennepin County will provide and established a target date of March 1,
1998 as the date the County would assume environmental health inspections. In addition, we
discussed staff concerns regarding County protocol, how to reach the County in the event of an
emergency, licensing issues, and the monetary transfer for 1998 collected fees. There are a few
areas that the County does not inspect as part of its program and these include wrapped /unwrapped
vending machines, ice, food manufacturing, etc. However, the State Department of Agriculture
already inspects these areas annually for the City and will continue to do so. In many cases,
businesses in New Hope were paying two licensing fees (state and city) and were being inspected
twice.
There are two areas of inspection that neither the County nor the State provide and these are the
inspection of 3.2 beer and garbage trucks. Incidentally, these are not required areas of inspection by
the State. Staff, along with neighboring communities, will need to look into long term solutions for
local needs. The Hennepin Recycling Group (HRG) is particularly interested in a local approach to a
comprehensive garbage hauler inspection program.
Staff also met with the Department of Agriculture (MDA) to team more about their inspection program
and services. There is no formal agreement between the City of New Hope and MDA for inspection
services, primarily because the agency has the final statutory authority to inspect all facilities in the
state that fall within their jurisdiction. However, they would like to establish an agreement that outlines
their services, in conjunction with those of Hennepin County. As a result, City Staff will know under
which jurisdiction a particular facility falls. The meeting was productive and highly informative.
When will this happen?
In order for the transition to occur officially, the State will draft a letter of agreement to the City of New
Hope in which it accepts responsibility for environmental health inspections in the City and delegates
the responsibility to Hennepin County. The City Attorney will review the document and it will be placed
on the February 23 City Council agenda, pending its arrival. The agreement between MDA and the
City, however, may not be finalized by March 1, but this document is not necessary for MDA to
continue their inspections. Its primary purpose is to enhance intergovernmental relations between the
City and MDA.
Who is affected?
Community Development
The Community Development Department needs to prepare documents that outline the various
inspection jurisdictions along with contact names and phone numbers of all field personnel in the
event of an emergency or for routine staff or resident inquiries. The Department also needs to
communicate this information with all city departments so that the Police Department knows who to
call in the case of public nuisance home or Public Works knows who to call in the event of water
quality issues, and so forth.
Finance & Administration
The Finance & Administration Department needs to determine the amount of 1998 collected fees to
be transferred to the County, minus any legal and administrative fees incurred in 1998.
Page 2
6 March 1998
Dear Business License Owner:
Sincerely,
Hennepin County
-L--, %j‘Xi4t'L-s
Susan Palchick, Ph.D., MPH Dan Donahue
Supervisor, Environmental Health City Manager
Community Health Department
Epidemiology and Environmental Health
1011 South First Street, Suite 215
Hopkins, MN 55343 -9413
Epidemiology (612) 930 -2729 Environmental Health (612) 930 -2770
FAX:(612) 930 -2782
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Hennepin County will assume responsibility for environmental health services for food,
- beverage, lodging and swimming pool facilities in New Hope beginning March 1, 1998. After
the resignation of their health inspector, the City evaluated their options and decided that the
County could best provide these services. Inspections, plan reviews, education, emergency
outbreak response, licensing and complaint follow -up will be handled by Hennepin County
Epidemiology and Environmental Health staff.
The fees that you have paid to the City for 1998 will cover your 1998 Hennepin County license.
Please fill out the enclosed application form and return it so we can issue you a County license.
The information on the application form is necessary for our department records. Hennepin
County requires each food establishment to have a certified food manager and the State requires
each swimming pool to have a certified pool operator on staff. Classes for both are offered both
by the County and other educational companies.
The County has 6 environmental health specialists covering the 35 cities under our jurisdiction.
Each inspector has an assigned area but is also available to answer questions and do plan reviews
for other areas. Steve Bray will be the inspector for New Hope establishments and will be
visiting you soon. You can address questions to him or any other staff at 930 -2770. We hope to
make this transition as easy as possible and provide the best environmental health service to the
businesses and citizens of New Hope.
Recycled Paper
Neighboring Communities' Opinion on Hennepin County Health Inspection Services
Robbinsdale
Contact: Deb Skogen, City Clerk, 537 -4534
Have been using County services for awhile (at least for the 3 years that she's been there)
They have County applications at the counter for applicants, but inform that they need to send
all fees and direct all inquiries to the County
The County is relied upon to license all of the food vendors during city festivals
The City is pleased with County services and they are very easy to work with
No complaints from businesses
Plymouth
Contact: Joe Ryan, Building Official, 509 -5000
They have been using County services since at least 1979 for all environmental inspections
They are very good to work with and provide great service and follow -up
Staff refers all license inquiries directly to the County; they do not have County application
forms at City Hall
Does not remember any complaints that the City doesn't perform these services
Not a lot of paperwork for the City
Brooklyn Center
Contact: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk, 569 -3300
They have been using County services since 1992
Reduced tremendous amount of licensing processing /paperwork for City Clerk/License Clerk
They have never received any complaints from citizens that the City isn't performing these
services
They've had "really good luck with Hennepin County"
Switching to the County was a tremendous cost savings, close to $100,000 for Sanitarian and
2 health inspectors
Council is happy with decision
Maple Grove
Contact: Laura Kushner
Having Hennepin County perform this service is much less expensive
For their purposes the County works well
HENNEPIN COUNTY
CITY OF HOPKINS
Food Establishment
$330.00
Includes Restaurants & Grocery
$115.00 to
$275.00
Daycare
$163.00
$0.00
Daycare Snacks
$93.00
Small restaurant license
$120.00
Congregate Dining /Limited Food
$163.00
Small restaurant license
$120.00
Catering Food Vehicle
$249.00
Catering Food Vehicle
$145.00
Each Additional Vehicle
$75.00
$145.00
Temporary Food Stand — 1St day
$32.00
Temporary Food Stand
$25.00
Each Additional Day
$8.00
$0
(No charge for non-profits)
Swimming Pools
Outdoor
$249.00
Outdoor
$90.00
Indoor
$249.00
Indoor
$135.00
Special Purpose
$249.00
Special Purpose
$25.00
Each Additional Pool
$156.00
Fee based on above
Lodging- basic fee
$137.00
None
Each Room or unit
$2.00
Each Room
$4.00
Vending Machines
Does Not Do
Vending Machines
$15.00
Bakery
Does Not Do
Bakery
$90.00
Several licenses are calculated both ways as follows:
HENNEPIN COUNTY CITY OF HOPKINS
Taits SuperValu Food Establishment - $330 $320
Gene's Midnight Market Food Establishment - $330 $205
Nelson's Meatmarket Food Establishment - $330 $250
Hopkins House Lodging, swimming pools - $864 $804