Loading...
12-04-2023 HOPKINS PARK BOARD AGENDA Monday, December 4, 2023 6:30 pm THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL THE START OF THE PARK BOARD MEETING The public may attend this meeting in-person. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ADOPT AGENDA III. COMMUNITY COMMENT 1. At this time, any interested resident may come to speak on an item not on the evening’s agenda. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes of the August 28, 2023 Park Board Meeting 2. Minutes of the September 25, 2023 Park Board Meeting 3. Minutes of the October 30, 2023 Park Board Meeting V. GENERAL BUSINESS 1. Park System Master Plan Update, Imihy Bean VI. GENERAL PARK UPDATE VII. PARK AREA ASSIGNMENT REPORTS 1. Callie Flynn: Burnes, Buffer 2. Kimberly Stiele: Park Valley, Oakes 3. Kristin Hanneman: Maetzold, Valley 4. Wendy Woodfill: Harley, Elmo 5. Matthew Miller: Downtown, Central 6. Carsyn Johnson: Cottageville, Minnehaha Creek Preserve 7. Rachel Dachenbach: Interlachen, Hiawatha 8. Jon Lyksett: Shady Oak Beach, Hilltop VIII. ANNOUCEMENTS 1. Next Meeting: Monday, January 22, 2024 – at Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st St S. IX. ADJOURN HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS AUGUST 28, 2023 8 CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Hopkins Park Board was held on Monday, August 28, 2023, at 6:31 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. Chair Stiele called the meeting to order with Members, Flynn, Lyksett, Miller, Woodfill, and Youth Member Johnson attending. Vice Chair Hanneman and Member Dachenbach were absent. Others attending included Deputy City Clerk Osman and Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean. ADOPT AGENDA Motion by Miller Second by Flynn Motion to Adopt the Agenda. Ayes: Flynn, Johnson, Lyksett, Miller, Stiele, Woodfill Nays: None. Absent: Hanneman, Dachenbach. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA GENERAL BUSINESS V.1. New Member Welcome; Imihy Bean Special Project and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean welcomed Member Flynn and Member Woodfill to the Park Board. Deputy City Clerk Osman was also introduced to the Park Board and will be attending meetings to take minutes and work on the administrative side with Imihy Bean. V.2. Overpass Skate Park Update; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave a formal update regarding the Overpass Skate Park underneath the HWY 169 overpass. Due to limited funds, the recommendations to the Park System Master Plan, and lack of use of the park from residents due to skill level required to use the park, the maintenance of the ramps and overall care of the park could not be maintained. The City would withdraw the support to maintain the facility amounting to seven thousand dollars but the opportunity to maintain use and operate the space was offered to 3rd Lair. 3rd Lair said they would not like to operate the skate park anymore. The window for operating the park has also been closed. Without the funding, it was in the best interest to close the park. One resident was present to speak before the Park Board regarding the closure of the Overpass Skate Park. The resident said the facility is used every day and understands the City could not make money from it. They suggest making the area a public park to draw more attention. The resident also highlighted the multipurpose use of the space such as having a garden and art. The resident asked the Park Board to consider keeping the Overpass Skate Park since it is a good community space. Chair Stiele suggested the resident contact the Park Board via email with more information regarding the concerns surrounding the skate park so the board can get a better understanding. Stiele notified the resident that this would be a good time to share feedback HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS AUGUST 28, 2023 8 regarding parks because the Park Board is working on the Park System Master Plan. Members discussed fitting a skate park in the plan and considered what they are willing to change in the current master plan to achieve this. V.3. Park Events Update; Stiele/Miller Chair Stiele and Member Miller provided an update regarding the Buckthorn Removal event. Member Miller mentioned this event is a great opportunity to get involved in the community and address environmental needs by moving invasive species. Member Miller would like to continue the work done in the previous year surrounding this and continue to maintain buckthorn. He recommends maintaining the previous site as well as looking at new spaces which need care. The Park Board reviewed the buckthorn event plan provided by Member Miller and reviewed the roles and responsibilities of the board along with how to best promote the event to residents. V.4. Park Board Work Plan Review; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Park Board Work Plan. Every year, the Park Board goes through the work plan to review park dedication funds, advise the City Council on the operations and maintenance of parks, and to increase public understanding of park policies, practices, and ongoing projects. Certain projects listed on the work plan include the Park System Master Plan, reviewing and recommending changes to staff on the Adopt-A-Park program, and establishing a relationship with Minnetonka recreation and Public Works. This allows for partners to give regular updates and provide communication. Imihy Bean let the Park Board know they are welcome to add more engagement opportunities to the work plan. Member Lyksett approves of the work plan and is excited to see more regarding the park dedication fees. Chair Stiele mentioned they liked the three focus points of the work plan and doing more events going forward. GENERAL PARK UPDATE VI.1. Park System Master Plan; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Park System Master Plan. Engagement is closed and the consultant is taking the last few rounds of engagement on the plans to incorporate it into a final document. Once completed, the Park Board will review the plan to check for inaccuracies or things which do not represent the system or community sentiment. It will then go to the City Council for adoption. Based on current feedback, Imihy Bean says people really like the City parks but want the parks to be nicer in terms of things like equipment and access to things across the system. For example, if a resident wanted to go to a splash pad, they would have to go to Burnes Park. Residents would like to see amenities offered equally across the parks which one aspect the master plan looks at. Imihy Bean also highlighted the fact that although Hopkins is dense and space is limited, certain areas were left open on the master plan to be mindful of and accommodate future needs and amenities from residents. The Park System master plan is a visioning document and the City is still far from implementing them and beginning construction. Nicole Schoonover is a Golden Valley resident who has children attending the Hopkins HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS AUGUST 28, 2023 8 Public Schools District. Mrs. Schoonover is the president of Hopkins Fastpitch. Mrs. Schoonover shared concerns regarding the removal of one softball field at Central Park. Hopkins Fastpitch hosts a tournament there every summer and will not be able to host a tournament there or expand as a group with the removal of a field. Imihy Bean stated the City uses the National Parks and Recreation Association standard level of service which bases population to any amenity. In Hopkins, the level of service did not indicate a need for baseball or softball fields. This is based purely on population and the need for residents. Members of the Board appreciated the comments provided by Mrs. Schoonover and recommended having a conversation with Hopkins Fastpitch to talk about alternatives and Imihy Bean will provide the Park Board with more context and information regarding softball in the Park System Master Plan. A feasibility study has been requested before City Council for a full master plan for Central Park to understand the feasibility of the expansion of the Pavilion. This study will be brought back to the Park Board and another round of engagement will occur on a more microscopic point. Overall, this will give a more detailed explanation of how much improvements will cost and what this will look like. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS AUGUST 28, 2023 8 PARK AREA ASSIGNMENT REPORTS VII.1. Burnes, Buffer; Woodfill Member Woodfill was assigned to Burnes Park and Buffer Park. Member Flynn reported the drinking fountain by the picnic shelters is overshooting and needs to be recalibrated. Member Flynn also asked about the drinking fountain by the sand pit which is no longer there. Imihy Bean will follow up with the Park Board regarding this issue after speaking with Public Works. VII.2. Park Valley, Oakes; Stiele Chair Stiele reported Park Valley is getting used and looks fine. Oakes Park is more hidden and not used as much as Park Valley and overall, nothing needs to be fixed. VII.3. Maetzold, Valley; Hanneman Vice Chair Hanneman was absent therefore there were no reports. VII.4. Harley, Elmo; Flynn Member Flynn was assigned to Harely and Elmo Park. VII.5. Downtown, Central; Miller Member Miller reported Downtown Park and Central Park are being used and there are performances at Downtown Park. Member Woodfill receives questions about why there are no recycling receptacles at Central Park and Imihy Bean mentioned not many people are good at recycling and put trash in there as well which contaminates the whole bin. Woodfill also spoke about questions they get regarding the lack of picnic tables at Central Park and Imihy Bean will connect with Public Works regarding an increase in picnic tables. VII.6. Cottageville, Minnehaha Creek Preserve; Johnson Member Johnson reported Cottageville Park is looking good. Minnehaha Creek Preserve may have construction going on, but no one was there to ask. Aside from this, it looks good. VII.7. Interlachen, Hiawatha; Dachenbach Member Dachenbach was absent therefore there were no reports. VII.8. Shady Oak Beach, Hilltop; Lyksett Member Lyksett reported on Shady Oak Beach. Lyksett spent some time at the beach and things are fine there. There were no updates for Hilltop Park. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chair Stiele reviewed the upcoming meeting schedule. The next Park Board meeting will be Monday, September 25th, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS AUGUST 28, 2023 8 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Park Board, and upon a motion by Miller, second by Lyksett, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Naimo Osman, Deputy City Clerk HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Hopkins Park Board was held on Monday, September 25, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. Chair Stiele called the meeting to order with Vice Chair Hanneman, Members Dachenbach, Flynn, Lyksett, Miller, Woodfill, and Youth Member Johnson attending. Others attending included Deputy City Clerk Osman and Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean. ADOPT AGENDA Motion by Miller Second by Hanneman Motion to Adopt the Agenda. Ayes: Dachenbach, Flynn, Hanneman, Johnson, Lyksett, Miller, Stiele, Woodfill Nays: None. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA GENERAL BUSINESS V.1. Park Events Update; Stiele/Miller Chair Stiele and Member Miller provided an update regarding the Buckthorn Removal event. Member Miller thanked Park Board members for organizing the event and jumping into roles. Member Miller thank Member Flynn for leadership in communication and networking. Member Miller shared information regarding sign up for events and communicating and promoting the event as much as possible. Another accomplishment aside from having photography there mentioned by Member Miller was creating leadership roles in charge of the two removal sites which are Member Lyksett and a community member previously involved with the event. Handouts will be provided for volunteers at the event detailing how to identify buckthorn, cut buckthorn, and how to best use herbicides. Chair Stiele asked a question regarding the youth participation in this event without parental guidance. Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean mentioned they are open to having youth present but want to have parental supervision due to concerns of there being two sites and regarding hazardous materials used in the process of removing buckthorn. There currently is no parental waiver provided when signing up to volunteer. Imihy Bean stated there is potential for future participation with school districts and the Depot where the Park Board could work together on more organized projects with youth. Member Stiele shared information regarding an outside school district which provides students opportunities to do community service and mentioned them as a resource for next year’s buckthorn removal event. Member Flynn asked how many volunteers we had signed up for the event and what was the goal. Imihy Bean responded there were about ten signups so far with a month left and there is still time left for signups and opportunities for participation. Member Miller mentioned the group of participants in the buckthorn removal events is a group they are interested in growing for more collaborations in the future. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 V.2. Park Board Work Plan; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Park Board Work Plan. Imihy Bean spoke about the plan and placeholders where there are recommendations and opportunities for changes. An initiative listed in the annual work plan is to develop a master plan for Central Park which includes a feasibility study for an expansion of the Pavilion. Due to playground replacements and maintenance being deferred for Central Park, Staff and Public Works have recommended it a place to start in terms of investment in the parks and picking up on projects being deferred. Funds have been proposed and will go to City Council to do a master plan for Central Park. An expansion of the Pavilion would potentially include indoor play, indoor walking track, and part-time and year-round ice. Staff are working to get a better understanding of what plans would cost and how they might pay for it while making sure it is feasible with the space available. The second initiative includes touring Hopkins and Minnetonka recreation facilities. There has been no park tour as of recent and areas such as the newly constructed Marsh in Minnetonka provide opportunities for members to get to know the recreational facilities. Another initiative in the work plan is the annual buckthorn removal event which the Park Board is interested in continuing. Some budget has been allocated for this event for refreshments and other materials are generously provided by Hopkins Public Works. Chair Stiele inquired about whether they would have funding for the first initiative estimated at $100,000. Imihy Bean let them know there are currently funds available in the park development fund. Imihy Bean also mentioned there will also be a raise in franchise fees as well as other park dedication fees that will be available to fund specific projects. These projects are necessary next steps and there will be a way to find funding for them. Member Miller asked if projects would require purchasing land from the school district and Imihy Bean responded a purchase would not be required but they could lease land and come to arrangements with the school district. Member Hanneman wanted to confirm the $100,000 is for a study and plan of the region. Imihy Bean confirmed this money will be allocated to planning and not towards infrastructure. Member Miller asked about regional components towards planning and members discussed the different facilities provided by neighboring cities. Given the Park System Master Plan is being developed and the changing city, Member Miller asked if it was a good time to go over the park policies and do a policy review. Member Miller highlighted the importance of updating the policy as necessary and looking through the racial equity lens to make sure the park policy is in line with the vision of the Park Board. Imihy Bean agreed with this idea and encouraged the members to explore what other communities are doing and what would be a good fit for the Park Board to look at. Member Flynn agreed with Member Miller on reviewing park policies reviewing the education around them. Members discussed the importance of why some policies are not consistent and see why they are not. Chair Stiele mentioned the Park Board is interested in still doing Arbor Day and would like to continue to support this project with new ideas. Imihy Bean agreed with Chair Stiele and discussed adding and revising the work plan to factor in this event along with others. Member Hanneman would also like to have Earth Day, where people go to their park and HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 clean up. Hanneman also suggested the idea of doing park pop ups where a rotation of an activity could be held at a different park which would give residents the opportunity to explore the different parks in Hopkins. Park Board members discussed other ideas and initiatives they could do in the future. Member Lyksett shared information regarding native plant sales in neighboring communities which residents in Hopkins can benefit from. Members discussed this idea and suggested learning more about it and possibly collaborating with neighboring communities to do it. GENERAL PARK UPDATE VI.1. Park System Master Plan; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Park System Master Plan. The first couple of chapters of the plan are system focused and technical, so correction took some time. The Park Board can expect to have more information for reviewing in October. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 PARK AREA ASSIGNMENT REPORTS VII.1. Burnes, Buffer; Woodfill Member Woodfill reported no updates for Burnes Park. Woodfill expressed concerns about the lack of individuals at Buffer Park. VII.2. Park Valley, Oakes; Stiele Chair Stiele reported Oakes Park is doing well and enjoys the park. Chair Stiele asked about name change regarding Park Valley. Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean said a name change will be recommended for Valley Park and Buffer as part of the Park System Master Plan which City Council will adopt. Once approved, Public Works will manufacture new signs and an event will be held to celebrate the new names. VII.3. Maetzold, Valley; Hanneman Vice Chair Hanneman reported Maetzold looked good and the graffiti is gone. Hanneman recommends Valley Park could use a cleanup but otherwise no issues. The park is well used, and a lot of people are there during the day. Dogs are there as well and they are on leashes, which is good. VII.4. Harley, Elmo; Flynn Member Flynn reported no update for Harley. Elmo Park is in high density and is very concrete oriented. The swings and other park equipment get very hot, and the park is like a heat dome. Member Flynn suggested that since the Park Board is working on master planning, increasing shading at Elmo Park would be helpful. Even though Elmo Park is not on the list for updates, it would align with the Park Board’s goals of equity. VII.5. Downtown, Central; Miller Member Miller reported no updates for Central Park. Downtown Park is busy with events being hosted there and the use of seating being used reconfirmed what the designers are thinking for that park. Member Woodfill added some comments for Central Park and Downtown Park since they are there often. Woodfill spoke about the diverse use for Central Park. A concern they had was the two new apartments being built near Central Park and the future increase in residents who are going to use this park. Chair Stiele mentioned one of the reasons Central Park is being updated in the Park System Master Plan is to accommodate for the increase of residents who will be using that park. Woodfill also mentioned seeing an increase in pot smoker at Downtown Park. VII.6. Cottageville, Minnehaha Creek Preserve; Johnson Member Johnson reported no updates for Cottageville Park and Minnehaha Creek Preserve. Member Hanneman recently did a cleanup of Cottageville Park. VII.7. Interlachen, Hiawatha; Dachenbach Member Dachenbach reported no updates for Interlachen Park and Hiawatha Park. VII.8. Shady Oak Beach, Hilltop; Lyksett Member Lyksett reported no update for Shady Oak Beach, primarily due to the weather and the beach being closed. Noticed a few branches which have fallen after the storm at Hilltop Park. Member Flynn spoke in regard to the beach closures and possibly extending Burnes Park splash pad hours due to the extended summer weather and residents who are looking for places to cool off. If possible, have signage and notices posted online so HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 residents are aware of these extended hours. ANNOUNCEMENTS Chair Stiele reviewed the upcoming meeting schedule. Park Board will cancel the October 23rd meeting and hold a special meeting on October 30th, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean shared information regarding t he request for services for The Depot issued by the City. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS SEPTEMBER 25, 2023 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Park Board, and upon a motion by Hanneman, second by Lyksett, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 7:39 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Naimo Osman, Deputy City Clerk HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS OCTOBER 30, 2023 CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a special meeting of the Hopkins Park Board was held on Monday, October 30, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. Vice Chair Hanneman called the meeting to order with Members, Flynn, Miller, Woodfill, and Youth Member Johnson attending. Member Lyksett attended late. Chair Stiele and Member Dachenbach were absent. Others attending Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean. ADOPT AGENDA Motion by Miller Second by Flynn Motion to Adopt the Agenda. Ayes: Flynn, Hanneman, Johnson, Miller, Woodfill Nays: None. Absent: Dachenbach, Stiele, Lyksett. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT CONSENT AGENDA GENERAL BUSINESS V.1. Buckthorn Event Update; Stiele/Miller Member Miller provided an update regarding the Buckthorn Removal event. The Buckthorn Removal event will go as planned on November 4th, 2023. Member Miller explained the process and outline of the day along with the roles of the different volunteer groups. Member Miller welcomed and was excited to see the Park Board at the event. Special Projects and Initiatives Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the number of volunteers at the event, totaling twenty-eight. Public Works will provide tools and light refreshments will be provided for volunteers. Member Miller asked to have copies of the liability form which will be provided by Imihy Bean. V.2. Park Board Work Plan; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Park Board Work Plan. Imihy Bean was seeking final approval from the Park Board on the updated work plan reflective of comments from the board at the previous meeting. One item on the work plan is to develop a master plan for Central Park which includes a feasibility study for an expansion of the Pavilion. This is consistent with the work being done on the Park System Master Plan and targeted to be complete by the end of next year. The second initiative is to tour Hopkins and Minnetonka recreation facilities for Members to get a better understanding of parks and recreation spaces. A modified initiative added to the work plan is to continue to table at events and create events related to the parks such as Buckthorn Removal event, Arbor Day, and Earth Day. Imihy Bean complimented the Park Board members on their active involvement and initiative taking to do new projects not done before. The final item on the work plan is to review the park policies for racial equity which may require support or forming working groups with Minnetonka recreation. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS OCTOBER 30, 2023 Member Flynn asked the group whether reviewing of park policies will be narrowed down to racial equity or if it would be a general policy review. Member Miller said his proposal to review park policies was with intent to review it under the racial equity lens. This proposal is a result from the responses on the Park System Master Plan and making sure whether the Park Board policies are relevant to how the parks will be governed. Miller thinks it is important to look at equity and accessibility in the parks and confirm what is talked about amongst Park Board members and is written on the page. Member Flynn asked if the focus on racial equity was too narrow and if this review should be more general. Member Miller believes it is important to acknowledge when the board is addressing race and equity. The Park Board member agreed to do a review of park policies for consistencies with the Park System Master Plan and with the City’s equity goals. V.3. Adopt-A-Park Program; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Adopt- A-Park program and is seeking a motion to adopt the changes as recommended in the report. As a part of the previous years’ work plan, the Park Board has talked about making some changes to the Adopt-A-Park program. The summary provided to the Park Board is intended to be an overview and to provide feedback. There are fourteen parks and one trail available for individuals, families, groups, etc. to adopt. There is no regular communication between adopters and the City. With new staff capacity and the Park Board wanting to see the program more robust, recommendations were brought before the Park Board. The first recommendation is to update materials such as documents on the website, information about adopters, requirements of the program, and overall do administrative work from City’s end. This also includes increasing communication and making sure adopters are aware of the resources from Public Works and expectations. Another recommendation is to add more information on how to do a one day clean up due to a lot of interest from individuals. It is also recommended that due to the Park Board’s interest in the program, they are also more involved in it going forward. The Park Board will connect with adopters in their area assignments and coordinate and participate in events in those areas. The Park Board is also open to hosting a city-wide event for cleaning up the parks as discussed in the work plan. As the Adopt-A-Park program changes, there may be more updates and need to evaluate what is working and what is not. Vice Chair Hanneman provided feedback on the responsibilities of adopters and believes it is a much larger and more intensive program. Imihy Bean clarified that what is recommended in the report in terms of responsibilities is like what other Metro communities use in their program. Some of these responsibilities are also necessary and can be modified as this is just a proposal of recommendations. Member Miller would like to have a set number of days for cleanup throughout the year and have adopters schedule what days those are. Member Miller recommends having adopters fill out some kind of report of what they experienced at the parks to collect data and to make it less of a burden on staff. Member Miller also wanted to thank and acknowledge City staff for taking on the research for this project and said the report is a great response to conversations previously had and exceeds expectations. Members discussed and made edits on the recommendations in the proposal. The Park Board made a motion to adopt the recommendations in the report. GENERAL PARK UPDATE VI.1. Park System Master Plan; Imihy Bean Special Projects and Initiative Manager Imihy Bean gave an update regarding the Park HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS OCTOBER 30, 2023 System Master Plan. Imihy Bean spoke with Confluence and expects them to be at a Park Board to talk more about the plan. The master plan will go to City Council in December. Member Flynn requested to have Confluence’s materials before their presentation for review and Imihy Bean agreed to provide those materials to the Park Board members for their review. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS OCTOBER 30, 2023 PARK AREA ASSIGNMENT REPORTS VII.1. Burnes, Buffer; Woodfill Member Woodfill reported no updates for Burnes Park and Buffer Park. VII.2. Park Valley, Oakes; Stiele Chair Stiele was absent and reported no updates. VII.3. Maetzold, Valley; Hanneman Vice Chair Hanneman reported Maetzold’s grass looked great. Vice Chair Hanneman interviewed some kids playing at Valley Park and they reported some issues which Hanneman reported to Imihy Bean. VII.4. Harley, Elmo; Flynn Member Flynn reported no update for Harley and Elmo Park other than they both look good when they visited. VII.5. Downtown, Central; Miller Member Miller reported no updates for Downtown Park and Central Park. VII.6. Cottageville, Minnehaha Creek Preserve; Johnson Member Johnson reported no updates for Cottageville Park and was not able to make it to Minnehaha Creek Preserve. VII.7. Interlachen, Hiawatha; Dachenbach Member Dachenbach was absent and reported no updates. VII.8. Shady Oak Beach, Hilltop; Lyksett Member Lyksett reported no update for Shady Oak Beach and Hilltop Park, but everything looks good. ANNOUNCEMENTS Vice Chair Hanneman reviewed the upcoming meeting schedule. Park Board will cancel the November and December regular meetings and hold a special meeting on December 4, 2023, at 6:30 p.m. in the Raspberry Room at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. HOPKINS PARK BOARD REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS OCTOBER 30, 2023 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Park Board, and upon a motion by Miller, second by Woodfill, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 7:17 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Naimo Osman, Deputy City Clerk CITY OF HOPKINS 28 DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 29 ELEVATING THE ROLE OF PARKS Hopkins Parks have historically focused on recreation and traditional sport activities for youth such as baseball and hockey. While this is still an important role for the parks, the city’s demographics and land use patterns are changing rapidly and the parks must adapt in order to accurately reflect the people living around them. The Park System needs to support all Hopkins residents as the city changes. This is challenging because limited opportunities for expansion or new facility development, which in turn means the existing bones of the park system cannot change much. To satisfy growth needs, the parks need to do more and be more than they currently are to meet the changing needs of the community. The most successful and well loved Park Systems are vital to the community and are viewed as essential city services. Parks are critical elements to the quality of life, and are a vital to attracting and retaining residents, businesses, and visitors. Significant research has identified the importance of parks and green infrastructure including positive contributions to: • City image and civic pride • Increased property values • Significant air and water quality and urban cooling benefits • Notable physical and mental health benefits • Child development and learning is linked to exposure to nature • Increased resilience to impacts from climate change Investing in improving parks is investing in community on multiple levels. Parks should be viewed and treated as an essential city service in all aspects of the city’s administration including planning efforts, budgeting, decision making, and investment opportunities. REFLECTION OF THE CITY The Park System should be a clear representation of the City’s Vision and Mission Statements. When someone steps into a park in Hopkins - can they perceive the manifestation of the City’s Mission and Vision? City Mission: Inspire, Educate, Involve, Communicate City Vision: Creating a spirit of community where... • All people feel safe and respected, and diversity is celebrated • Business growth is supported, and a vibrant downtown is maintained • People enjoy exceptional government services, neighborhoods and outstanding schools City’s Vision for Equity • The City of Hopkins is reflective and inclusive of our diverse community in all roles across the organization. • The City of Hopkins makes decisions informed by equitable and authentic community engagement, genuine partnerships and relationships with the community. • The City of Hopkins is committed to equity, diversity, and inclusion in the development and evaluation of services and programs. The consultant team feels there is opportunity to better align the existing park system with the City’s Vision, Mission, and Goals. In order to effectively achieve this alignment, the park system needs to be viewed as an essential government service. 04 PARK SYSTEM VISION BIG IDEA OF THE SYSTEM DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 30 PARK SYSTEM VISION AND MISSION The park system is an important part of the City’s overall quality of life and impacts residents every day. A significant park system utilizes tax resources and should be held accountable to residents and decision makers. A vision and mission statement should be developed for the City to help guide decisions and priorities. These statements and themes are a guide for the future and should be referred back to as a gauge on how successful key decisions, priorities, and projects have been. The Vision Statement for Hopkins Parks highlights what residents, staff, and leadership collectively wish for the future. The Mission Statement is a guide for how the City will implement this Vision. The statements build upon Hopkins overall mission, vision, and goals but apply directly to the park system. The statements were informed by extensive community engagement. Strong themes were identified in the engagement that should be prioritized during any future planning, design, infrastructure decisions and building/ construction. The Mission and Vision Statements were synthesized from a series of engagement exercises that identified themes important to the City’s parks, and continued to prioritize those themes to discern the most vital for the Park System to be successful. The following narrative describes this process. Park Accessibility Gathering & Community Building Parks for All Focus on Quality Park facilities and programs are high quality and culturally relevant for BIPOC residents. Reduce barriers to park amenities for all park users and mobility levels. Build community with neighborhood and city-wide gathering facilities. Provide opportunities for passive and active recreation that suit a broad range of users. Revitalize existing fields, facilities, courts, and playgrounds. VISION Together we will make Hopkins parks more equitable, accessible, better suited to bring people together, serve all users, and provide high-quality amenities. MISSION We will do this by prioritizing parks as a city service that provides exceptional experiences for all residents in an accessible and sustainable manner that leverages our uniqueness, dynamic partnerships, and diversity. Racial Equity Key Themes DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 31 Communication & Awareness: provide directional and identification signage, create a recognizable identity for parks (branding). Enhance translation to better connect with non-English speaking communities. PRIORITY THEME VOTING Priority Themes Art Integration and Partnerships: sustain park programs and infrastructure by developing creative public-private partnerships. Continue to integrate art into the fabric of the city. Equity: ensure all residents have access to quality parks and programming, regardless of income, mobility level, or demographics. Provide opportunities that are inclusive to all though accessible infrastructure and affordable opportunities. Environmental Sustainability and Resiliency: Add facilities that are durable, affordable to maintain, and reduce energy consumption and waste. Ecosystem services provided by parks should be maximized through green infrastructure and environmentally focused park design. Natural Resources: convert less used grass areas to native plants, encourage diversity of tree species and increase canopy coverage, small scale ecological improvements, water quality enhancement. Create landscapes that build resiliency for the park system and city. Leverage Partnership for Learning and Programming: build on existing partnerships to broaden programming, and learning opportunities. Provide diverse program options that encourage people to try something new. All Season Recreation: Provide recreation opportunities all-year long and make winter recreation a priority. Provide both recreation opportunities and events to celebrate all-seasons. Unique Parks: Ensure parks reflect the surrounding neighborhoods needs, provide non-traditional park facilities and activities. Parks are a major contributor to a strong community identity and are regional destinations. Celebrate and Share History: Capitalize on Hopkins’ downtown historic district and focus on preservation. Evolve interpretation and education programming to engage diverse populations and ages. Connections to Parks and Trails: Prioritize safe connections to all parks and trails including local and regional trails, sidewalks, transit access, and safe intersection crossings. Nexus of regional trails, connections to Main St. Parks For All: Engage people of all ages and abilities by providing accessible facilities and creating programming for all residents. Maximize the health benefits of parks with focused programming and by providing passive and active uses. Gathering and Community Building: Focus on bringing the community together through group gathering facilities and programming. Create neighborhood pride through parks and encourage neighborhood gatherings Priority Themes One of the key community engagement exercises asked the public to help prioritize themes to focus on during the Park System Plan. The themes selected were identified and synthesized from the City’s Comprehensive Plan and previous planning documents (shown at right). These themes are all important to Hopkins. The Park System should attempt to support these themes in some manner; however, parks are competing with other city services for resources and priorities need to be defined. We asked the public to help us identify which themes were most important. Online and in-person engagement opportunities were used to collect this input from a range of users including the general public, stakeholders, and staff. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 32 Key Themes 5 key themes that follow were evaluated, identified, and prioritized based on a combination of the following: • Public engagement • Stakeholder engagement • Consultant experience and input • Staff input • Park Board input and evaluation of community engagement Chapter 2 highlighted the existing system’s limitations and strengths and how the community wants the park system to look in the future. The 5 identified themes all ranked in the top themes identified by the general public and looking at identified stakeholders. The Consultant and Staff provided input and verified prioritization based on their experience, inventory, and analysis of the park system and interpretation of engagement feedback. Hopkins Park Board reviewed the extensive community engagement collected in the summer of 2022. Through a workshop with the consultant team, the Park Board helped identify and prioritize these key themes and ranked them according to how important the community was telling them each theme was. The Park Board ranked each theme on a scale of 0-10 with 0 indicating the theme was not addressed at all, and 10 indicating that the theme was fully addressed. They first ranked how they thought the current park system treated each theme. Lastly they ranked where they thought the community was telling us about what level they wanted each theme addressed. A larger gap between current and desired levels indicates how much work needs to be done and what this plan should prioritize. The following section will provide an analysis and framework for addressing these key themes in long range planning and upcoming improvement projects. These key themes are highly related and integrated. Working on one of the themes will have a ripple effect through many of them, building strength momentum for change that reinforces the city’s larger goals.GATHERING &COMMUNITY BUILDINGRACIAL EQUITYFOCUS ON QUALITYPARKS FOR ALLPARK ACCESSIBILITY0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 not addressed fully addressed Desired Level Current Level DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 33 There is a disparity between park and amenity quality in Hopkins. Burnes and Cottageville Parks have a consistently higher level of quality, more amenities, and more robust level of amenities than a majority of other parks. The ballfields and related amenities at Maetzold Field are also at a higher level of quality than other parks. The Pavilion at Central Park is another example of a high quality facility that is premier compared to the rest of the park and other related parks. The differences in quality and amenities were the result of decisions made in the past and contributions from partnering stakeholder groups for key infrastructure they desired. The baseball and hockey associations have an extensive history with Hopkins Parks and provided significant funding and volunteer input to improve the facilities they use most. Contributions from partners are a common and positive way to improve a community’s facilities when there are budget limitations. However, there is potential for actual and perceived imbalance with this approach. The city should be conscious of the park improvement history when working with partners and associations looking to make improvements in the parks. Hopkins should use the park Value, Mission, and Theme Statements to ensure the improvement projects are a positive addition for a majority of Hopkins residents. Additionally, the city should have a plan for investment and reinvestment in park infrastructure that identifies priorities clearly to the public and doesn’t rely on the loudest voices in the room to direct funding. Transparency is a critical element in addressing equity. Historically, park improvements have often been directed toward the most organized neighborhood groups, the most well connected, and generally wealthier areas of a community. Parks in lower income and more diverse areas often are further down the list. Allocating dollars based on equity means allocating dollars to what a park needs and not simply spreading money equally to all parks. Some parks need to do more with less. They are accessed by more people on less acreage, are located near larger populations of low- income residents, have higher neighborhood crime issues, and a multitude of other factors and pressures that would identify them as having a higher priority based on need. While the entire park system needs to be updated, there are some parks with greater needs. An analysis tool could help the city prioritize equity and need in allocating improvement dollars. Parks that should be prioritized for capital improvement based on equity are typically parks in neighborhoods with the following characteristics: • Higher populations and population density. • Less adjacent parkland. They are more isolated. • Lower income residents. • Higher BIPOC populations. • Higher population of kids below age 18. • Higher crime rates. • Poor park conditions and historic lack of investment. Demographics & Recreation Needs As the demographics of Hopkins continues to change, the recreation needs of residents will also shift. The city should continue to engage and monitor residents to understand these needs. The tennis courts and ball diamonds of Hopkins parks reflect the recreational trends of the demographics that existed when the parks were built. An understanding of current demographics and needs is crucial. Planners, designers, and staff should note that while there are broader recreation trends occurring in the state and metro region laid out in Chapter 1, they may not match local trends and needs. For instance, girls softball is growing and attracting greater diversity than past populations and tennis is attracting a much broader diversity of users than it has in the past. Continual engagement and coordination with area programmers and associations will help the city keep a finger on the pulse of the ever changing demographics and recreation trends. There are consistent recreation trends that are occurring that could provide immediate impacts on Hopkins Parks and should be considered: • Basketball continues to be one of the most popular sports across many demographics • Pickleball is consistently growing • Access to nature is a priority for all ages RACIAL EQUITY Park facilities and programs are high quality and culturally relevant for BIPOC residents. Maetzold Field’s maintenance is shared by HALL and Hopkins staff Backstop, no benches, grass infield at Valley Park DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 34 EQUITY ANALYSIS RANKINGS DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 35 New splash pad, building, basketball courts at Burnes Park vs. lack of programing and aged equipment at Harley Hopkins • Bikes, scooters, skateboards, etc. are growing as a commuter and recreation activity - mountain biking has been the fastest growing high school sport in Minnesota for a few years • Soccer, lacrosse, cricket, etc. are all growing and utilize similar field space • Dog and pet ownership was growing before COVID and skyrocketed during that time period The city should be mindful of these trends and their growth across the metro. Flexibility and thoughtful design of park spaces will allow the city to more efficiently and effectively respond to these changes and not approach things in a reactionary manner that will negatively impact the park or any future modifications. Equity Analysis Addressing racial equity has been a primary goal of the Park Systems Plan from the beginning of the planning process. An analytical approach to assign equity values to each of the parks in this study was morphed from previous projects and processes to fit the City of Hopkins goals and resources. The results take 15 datasets into account and weigh each data source differently to derive a composite score. The parks are ranked by this weighted score, with the highest numbers needing the most attention from an equity perspective. Figure XX graphically identifies the park improvement priorities based on this equity analysis. Most of the parks at the top of the list for equity priority are in areas anticipated to receive significantly more new residents in the coming years. These areas are currently more diverse, heavily renter occupied, and projected to remain so in the coming years. Cottageville Park was ranked high in the analysis. This justifies recent and continued investment. 325 Blake and Cottageville phase 2 developments will be constructed in the next few years and require more park investment to help maintain the quality of the system. Other parks with high rankings are located near Mainstreet or the proposed Light Rail Transit stations. Both of these areas are anticipated to experience significant population growth in the near future. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 36 Barriers exist in Hopkins that prevent or diminish the accessibility of parks and specific park amenities. These barriers can be physical and/ or social/ mental. Hopkins can address a majority of barrier types with well designed and thoughtful infrastructure improvements. Parks should be open and used by all residents to maximize their benefits in the most cost effective manner. The impact of these improvements will directly promote equity throughout the city. PHYSICAL Within Parks Universal design principles and practices can help maximize accessibility by reducing barriers for those with mobility challenges. Accessibility standards and universal design were not a priority of park systems in the past and typical parks constructed prior to these standards often have accessibility challenges. Hopkins has a number of these parks and is contracting with an independent consultant to provide analysis and recommendations to bring playground facilities into line with current accessibility standards and best practices. The city should anticipate implementing these recommendations as they are able once the study is complete. Many cities in the Metropolitan Region are constructing inclusive playgrounds. These playgrounds are similar to a traditional facility except that they welcome children and adults of all abilities to a play experience where everyone can interact and play together. Central Park has a number of supporting amenities that would support an inclusive playground such as: • Proximity to building and full restrooms • Ample parking close to playground • Shade and water access • Centralized location within the city • Easy navigation from major roadways Universal design principals apply to other amenities and should be included or retrofitted into new and existing park features as projects and budgets allow. Access to unique amenities such as the archery range, skate or all-wheel playgrounds, and any new dog parks should be included as a baseline for the park. PARK ACCESSIBILITY Including key infrastructure can make a park much more usable by a broader and more diverse group of people with a range of mobility levels. Ample shade, benches for seating (in shade), water fountains, and accessible restrooms are a few key elements that can make a park more navigable, attractive, and enjoyable for all people. Connection to Parks Safe travel to parks is another key ingredient in accessibility. Many parks lack accessible sidewalks or trails that connect the neighborhood to the park’s amenities The city’s overall pedestrian and bicycling infrastructure are intimately intertwined with the accessible trails and amenities inside a park. Hopkins is severed by highways, railroads, and major arterial roadways that create distinct sub-areas within the city. These dividers can be physical and mental barriers for pedestrian and bicycle crossing of fully mobile individuals. These barriers become more challenging and imposing for people living with mobility impairments. Because of these dividing lines, portions of the city can be isolated from other areas. The city needs to focus on the following to ensure that all residents have access to high quality park facilities that meet their needs: 1. Improve the physical safety and mental perception of crossings over the major pieces of traffic infrastructure. 2. Ensure amenities and activities are equitably divided in all areas of the city so residents can access without crossing major transportation corridors. These strategies will need to occur over time and will require coordination with the city-wide bike and pedestrian plan. The light rail project, and anticipated redevelopment, provide an opportunity to dramatically increase the accessibility and connection from north to south in the center of the city. Focusing higher cost and higher impact amenities toward the center of the city will allow the most balanced accessibility from the north and south neighborhoods. Central Park should be a location for these larger, shared facilities. Pedestrian connections across Highway 7 and Excelsior Boulevard should be an element of any park improvements. The sand box and playground do not have paved paths to provide accessibility (Park Valley) Accessibility improvements will help all residents. Reduce barriers to park amenities for all park users and mobility levels. DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 37 Many playgrounds lack wheelchair access (Oakes Park) Restrooms with running water are more appealing and highly desired by certain cultural groups. SOCIAL Parks need to feel accessible and inviting to all. A visitor should feel welcome, accepted, and independent to use the park facilities, and that they are socially accepted. There are many reasons they may not live up to this ideal and a number of factors can lead to negative experiences from a social perspective. Priority Populations Putting Change in Motion (PCIM) talked to Priority Populations within Hopkins to understand what would make the parks more welcoming and invite others into the parks. Residents first need to know a park exists, that it has facilities they would like to use, and that they are comfortable and understand how to use them. PCIM noted that a few groups mentioned that more communication, and more effective information about the parks needed to be distributed to the community. Communications and programming are strategies that can reduce these social barriers. Communication elements/ strategies to socially include all residents: • Clear, simple, integrated online parks information is a key strategy to inform residents what options are available • An online inventory of park facilities and where they are located assists residents in finding key amenities and activities • Clear signage and wayfinding at the parks, on the trails, and in key Mainstreet locations. • Translation for critical information are available for appropriate demographics. Translations should exist in print/ signage and digital platforms to reach the broadest group of people. • Programming in the parks that cater to non-English speaking residents that introduce the participants to a specific place or activity. These can be introductory programs that expose residents to new opportunities. • Create inclusive events in parks and communicate with Priority Populations. • Focus on apartments as they often don’t receive as many flyers as single family homes. Providing core amenities can make a park more welcoming and accepting to all residents. Putting Change in Motion (PCIM)identified a number of key facilities residents mentioned that would make them want to use a park more: • Clean restrooms • Running water in restrooms - culturally important for some residents. • Drinking fountains. • Trail and accessibility improvements. • Lighting improvements. Another strategy to make parks more welcoming for Priority Populations is to focus on improvements for larger groups. Several groups that PCIM worked with noted that they like to gather at parks in large groups and desire infrastructure that helps enable them to so. See Gathering and Community theme for more information on specific facilities to encourage large group gathering. Crime and Safety Priority population focus groups identified crime, and the perception of crime, as a negative effect on feeling welcome in parks. The most common complaint was sharing park space with those that were drinking and using marijuana. Fights and late night use of parks by teenagers and young adults was also mentioned. These populations mentioned that restrooms were places where a lot bad behavior was occurring. Finding a balance between privacy and safety is a common task. Some strategies for addressing these issues in the parks include: • Increased police presence and patrols. • Signage posted with rules translated to major 2nd and 3rd languages of the neighborhood. • Increased lighting in key areas. • Increased presence of staff and other park users. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 38 Parks are an important destination for neighborhood and city- wide gathering. Infrastructure should facilitate these formal and informal gatherings in order to build civic pride, identity, and a more connected community. Infrastructure should focus on providing essential elements that improve park visits for the majority of users E.g.; clean restrooms, shade, drinking fountains, safe walkways and surfaces. Additional amenities that provide tools for outdoor food preparation and gathering are attractive to a variety of gatherings, e.g.; shade structures/ pavilions, grills, picnic tables grouped together, electricity, etc.. Providing this mixture of essentials and additional amenities provides a functional space for celebrations, parties, family gatherings, holiday events, and a number of other outdoor gathering events. The elements discussed above apply to a diverse set of uses, users, and demographics and should be provided at a range of facilities throughout the system to support small and large group gatherings. Gathering facilities were specifically identified by a number of neighborhoods and at events across the city by a majority of demographic groups. In focus groups, Somalis stressed the importance of parks to children. Since many Somali residents of Hopkins live in apartments, parks provide children with needed places to play. They also said that you can meet new people when you are at parks with your children. Somalis also felt that a very good way to distribute information about the parks is through the schools. GATHERING AND COMMUNITY INDOOR GATHERING FACILITIES Outdoor facilities is the focus of this park systems plan. However, indoor gathering facilities have an important role in cold weather climates. Hopkins is well served with certain types large indoor gathering spaces like the Hopkins Center for the Arts and the Pavilion. These facilities are a regional draw and welcome visitors from surrounding communities and throughout the Metro. The city is lacking in smaller scale indoor gathering facilities distributed throughout the city. These facilities could host smaller scale neighborhood functions and gatherings and be available for rental to host neighborhood picnics, birthday parties, political or civic events and activities, as well as classes and programming opportunities. Buildings have a higher upfront capital investment but can provide significant cost/ benefit over their lifecycle if the right situation. The City should study the opportunities to include these facilities in key locations that provide critical community services and potential for revenue generation. The city should explore the opportunity to integrate a larger covered facility that could support a number of community and recreation functions. This facility could be a simple roof structure over a large area that would provide shade and protect against weather. A structure like this will help Hopkins maximize their gathering and field space. The facility can be programmed extensively throughout the seasons and day. Lighting extends usage into the evening for a number of activities. The Roc in St. Louis Park and Edina’s outdoor ice rink are examples the city should study. These facilities provide flexibility, reliability, and stability to cities that need to maximize the usability of their facilities. Hopkins could explore the potential to add a similar open air facility into the Pavilion. This feature would provide more reliable ice in the winter, critical field space opportunities in the shoulder seasons that are protected from weather and lit to extend practice time past sunset, and a shade canopy to provide summer spaces for gathering and sport that are protected from the sun and rain. See Central Park concept plan in Chapter 4 for a vision of how this type of facility could fit into the park. Example multi-use structure in St. Louis Park - early spring field space Example multi-use structure in Edina - consistent winter ice. Build community with neighborhood and city-wide gathering facilities. DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 39 Recently updated pavilion at Burnes Park Aged pavilion at Central Park A variety of seating and gathering choices at Downtown Park Recently refurbished pavilion at Valley Park OUTDOOR GATHERING FACILITIES Picnic shelters or pavilions are the most common and simple form of gathering facility that can be integrated into a park. They provide shade, shelter from elements, enclosure, and a architectural destination that support gathering. These facilities can be scaled to fit the park space and desired programming and can contain supporting elements such as electricity, lighting, grills, tables, and sometimes water. These facilities are magnets for small scale picnics and parties as well as individuals resting or relaxing. The city has high quality pavilions at several parks throughout the city including Burnes and Valley Parks. New pavilions should be added to neighborhood and community parks. Existing pavilions should be replaced at the end of their surface life. New and replacement pavilions should be sourced from a quality provider for aesthetics and maintenance reasons. The city should develop a visual language for these facilities and remain consistent as new and replacement pavilions are brought into parks. The architectural form should be simple and well proportioned with quality materials. Pavilions and shade structures are universally desired and used by all demographics and support most active and passive activities in the parks. They should be fully connected with an accessible route so that all mobility levels can be included. Pavilions should be sited between activities and adjacent to walkways and trails so they are well used by a variety of people. Community parks should have multiple pavilions in key areas of the park. They should support popular activities in addition to traditional sports. Examples include: • Community garden pavilion at Valley - this facility would be used by many and encourage interaction among users. • Archery range at Valley - provide critical shade to users and could be an anchor for accessibility at this popular amenity. • New pavilions to support - dog parks, pickleball, playgrounds and bicycle play areas, skate parks, and trail rest stops. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 40 LARGE GATHERINGS The Priority Population focus groups identified gathering as a favorite activity in the parks and specifically identified facilities to host large groups. These large group facilities should be located in community parks so they are supported by other necessary elements such as parking, water, restrooms, adequate waste receptacles, and a variety of activities to support a range of ages. Restrooms are a key facility wherever gathering occurs and becomes more important as group size increases. Portable toilets can be overwhelmed by multiple large group gatherings. Quality restrooms with running water are important to support large groups and a more enjoyable gathering experience. Downtown Park is a well loved and well used park that hosts multiple large gatherings throughout the year. Downtown Park does not have a permanent restroom. Clean bathrooms with running water would make the park experience better and more welcoming for families, seniors, and other cultures. Restrooms would make a good park great. See concept plan in Chapter 4 for ways to integrate restrooms into Downtown Park. REVENUE GENERATION The gathering facilities discussed in this section can provide revenue for the city if they are of high quality and desirable. These facilities can help their own operations and maintenance by collecting revenue for private events like weddings, birthday parties, religious celebrations, etc.. Supporting infrastructure is vital to revenue collection. Clean restrooms, parking, seating, shade, and ability to isolate the party are must have elements. These infrastructure pieces are relatively easy to incorporate into a park. Facilities that are unique, well cared for, and have a distinct sense of place are typically more desired by the public. Downtown Park is an example where the location, setting, and sense of place create a distinct environment that is unique to Hopkins and would be highly attractive to a number of users willing to pay rental fees. The city will need to balance the revenue generation potential of these facilities with the public benefit of having them open, available, and free to the general public. Downtown Park is a destination gathering facility and could generate higher revenue for the city. DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 41 Movable seating and options for gathering should be extended into park spaces. Customized gathering pods provide a sculptural feature and unique gathering spot. Parklets focused on lounging, bike repair, and gathering enrich the public space. INFORMAL GATHERINGS Parks are natural gathering spaces. They attract like-minded groups to participate in activities or rest in a natural setting. Simple, cost effective elements encourage gathering. Benches, tables, waste receptacles, and shade structures provide cues and create spaces attractive to gathering. Shade can be provided by trees and not more expensive shade canopies and pavilions. Hopkins has a robust program of movable furniture in the downtown and Mainstreet area. This approach could be provided at key parks to facilitate flexible gathering that is accessible to all. This flexible seating should be a part of the existing program so that it is all branded and reinforces Hopkins identity and approach to gathering. Mainstreet currently hosts several parklets that enrich the streetscape and provide additional seating for businesses. Public parklets and/ or creative seating and gathering options should also be considered on Mainstreet, the Artery, Downtown Park, and Hopkins Center for the Arts plaza to create gathering nodes in those spaces and further reinforce Hopkins commitment to the Arts and placemaking. These elements could be incorporated as a part of the POPS program in more urban areas and plazas. Providing food or beverage is another way to encourage gathering. Carts and food trucks could be used at specific times to create destinations for residents that would have very little cost to the city. Bringing people together is the goal. Supporting facilities like tables and waste receptacles would make this approach more appealing and implementable from an operations perspective. The city should think about all of the activities in it’s parks as gathering facilities. Ballfields, ice rinks, community gardens, skate parks, dog parks, archery ranges, etc. all attract a community of like minded people. Supporting facilities should be provided to all activities equally to provide a range of community gathering spaces for all. At a minimum these spaces should include: • Shade - urban canopy or built structures • Seating that accommodates multiple people - oriented to encourage discussion • Waste receptacles • Proximity to restrooms • Open sightlines • Accessible to all - mobility and languages DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 42 Parks should serve the residents that live around them. Amenities, programs, and ecosystem services should be present. Ecosystem services provide residents the opportunity to improve health, social connection, recreation, mental restoration, air and water quality benefits, and neighborhood pride. Well used parks are well loved parks. A well used a park needs to provide opportunities for all residents to engage in activities that are relevant and meaningful for their recreation needs. Park activities and amenities must adapt over time as recreation trends and the community’s demographics change. Hopkins parks need to do more with less in order to serve all residents and accommodate changing demographics and increased density. Parks are well distributed geographically and in close proximity to a majority of residents, but they lack diversity, variety, and energy. The framework exists for a rich park system - updating park amenities and programs is needed to evolve into a modern system that serves all residents. Thoughtful, creative design by experienced Landscape Architects is critical to delivering parks that are dynamic, serve all residents, and match city resources. Contemporary parks need to balance recreation trends, variety, and flexibility to meet current needs and be adaptable for a changing city. New amenities should be provided to expand recreation offerings. Popular activities should be preserved and enhanced - a balance of new and foundational park elements is required for a successful park. Thoughtful park design that is driven by community engagement is the primary vehicle to achieve this vital balance. BASELINE AMENITIES A baseline of amenities for each neighborhood park should be established that include amenities a majority of park users consistently utilize. This list of included amenities is less likely to change than more trendy recreational amenities and facilities. The Level of Service in Chapter 2 highlights deficits in the system and should be used as a baseline for balancing system wide. There are specific amenities that should be included in a majority of parks in PARKS FOR ALL Basketball is an activity that serves a broad age range - teens and adults both Seating and shade are important to give all users a place to rest the system. This sets a baseline of expectation for visitors to any of Hopkins parks. This critical level of service should include: • Playground(s) 2-12 year old age range • Benches and seating • Gathering structure with seating - sized accordingly • Court activity - basketball, tennis, pickleball, etc. • Accessible Trails - preferably looped trails where space allows • Restrooms or portable toilets • Open, flexible lawn Focus on variety and flexibility • Integrate new amenities in thoughtful manner • Mix of active and passive uses at each park • Trail loops as amenity • Natural areas as a vital component • Variety of ways to gather - not just focused around performance • dog parks as gathering • skateparks and all-wheel facilities • updated facilities - shade, picnic, etc. • Scaled facilities community level and neighborhood level in parks Provide options and flexibility to reflect surrounding neighborhoods and serve a range of users DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 43 KEY AMENITY ADDITIONS Hopkins parks have a limited footprint and opportunity for expansion. The existing acreage becomes more important as the population expands and traffic is increased. Increased diversity will require a greater diversity of park amenities and activities that Hopkins is currently lacking or is underserved These facilities were not historically abundant but have become established elements that serve a broader user group beyond traditional athletics. ALL-WHEEL/ SKATE PARKS The closure of Underpass Skate Park has created a vacuum in facilities that serve skate boarders. These facilities are of ten created to serve other wheeled activities such as rollerblades, scooters, and bikes. This serves a broader range of users. These facilities were once seen as a negative element but have been shown to have the following benefits: • Reduce illicit behavior • Provide a safe environment for skateboarding and riding • Create a safe social space for kids • Reduce damage to private property • Support physical and mental health benefits of skating/ riding • Have a positive economic impact on surrounding areas An all-wheel facility serves a common demographic and helps promote improved ridership, which can make streets and sidewalks safer throughout the city. A bike-centric all-wheel facility is proposed at Buffer Park. However, another skate-board centric facility should be considered in a more centrally located park within the city, or as a part of a future POPS facility. DOG PARKS Pet ownership has increased over time and dog adoption and purchases increased significantly during COVID. Dogs are often considered and treated as family members. Dog parks and exercise facilities are not only beneficial for the animals themselves, but they provide physical and mental health benefits for their owners. These amenities are social hubs for dog owners and provide a destination for active walks. Off-leash dog areas have become gathering areas in some communities. Crime has decreased in many cities near the off- leash areas and people who normally would not talk to each other will start conversations when a dog is there to break the ice. Hopkins does not currently have a sanctioned dog park in the city. This amenity was frequently requested by residents in community engagement events. Currently, general park spaces and open areas are used as informal dog parks, which can lead to user conflicts and issues. This informal usage does not capitalize on the social aspects of dog parks as the usage is typically off hours and sporadic. The concept plans in Chapter 4 highlight key parks that could support a social dog park facility. Additionally, we recommend using off-season hockey rinks that keep the boards up year round to provide smaller neighborhood scale dog parks. These facilities are spread throughout the City and take advantage of an underutilized off-season space with simple and cost effective improvements. These dog park locations are opportunities to provide education about the expectations and rules of dog ownership in Hopkins. Facilities such as dog waste stations should be provided at all dog park facilities and at popular dog walking areas throughout the City. Maintenance expenses for these facilities are significantly less than other athletic facilities. SPLASH PADS Splash pads have become a popular recreation amenity in parks. They are not meant to replace pools, but they do provide a fun aquatic experience at a reasonable cost. Splash pads typically do not have standing water so a lifeguard is not needed and generally require less supervision than a pool. They are typically more attractive to younger children and can be very interactive. Ongoing maintenance and cost of water can be an issue for systems that use city water but do not recirculate. Re-circulating systems are typically more expensive up front and do require more maintenance to ensure filters are changed out and safe water is provided. Splash pads located in parks typically do not have a use fee. Other components that are important with splash pads are access to restrooms and shaded seating areas for parents and caretakers. Splash pads did not emerge as a high priority need based on community engagement. It is recommended that they are a lower priority item in the City, but still an important part of aquatics recreation. All-wheel parks/ pump tracks can be used by bikes, skateboards, scooters, rollerblades, etc.. Dog parks are just as social for people as they are for pets. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 44 PICKLEBALL Pickleball is a fast paced game that is growing fast throughout Minnesota. It is a racket sport that combines elements of badminton, tennis, and table tennis. The rules are simple and it is an easy game for beginners to pick up. Advanced players play a fast-paced, competitive game. The courts at Central Park are well used with organized leagues and pick-up games at various times of the day. Pickleball is very social sport. Numerous leagues and tournaments have developed to build on this socialization. Private businesses have integrated pickleball into restaurant/ bar developments to take advantage of this aspect as well. While significant growth has taken place in older segments of the population, pickleball is spreading among all age s. A significant part of the sports appeal is that it doesn’t rely on highly technical skills, it can be learned with a little bit of practice and without expensive lessons. Expansion of pickleball courts at Central Park would capitalize on the nearby bars and restaurants of Mainstreet and fit into the park’s existing DNA of being a destination for adult sport/ activity leagues. NATURAL AREAS Natural areas and native vegetation are highly desired by Hopkins residents and should be integrated into park areas that don’t support active recreation activities. The benefits of nature to a majority of residents are increasingly understood to the general population. Natural areas provide valuable ecosystem services to the city such as; reduced flooding, heat island mitigation, air quality improvements, water quality improvements, mental health benefits, improved property values, and a number of additional quality of life benefits. Hopkins has limited areas of high quality natural areas within the city and a lack of opportunity to acquire or expand. The primary areas exist around wetlands and tributaries to the Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Corridors. These are important areas to the region’s water quality and under developed local recreation opportunities. Patches of natural habitat are scattered and isolated throughout the city and will be difficult to connect. The habitat areas that remain are marginal quality with many wetland and streambanks infested with reed canary grass and woodlands choked with buckthorn. However, these pieces of land still have significant Splash pads, like the one at Burnes Park, are highly used and don’t require lifeguards. They are important as a cooling element. Pickleball at Central Parks is a social gathering activity. Nature based play is proposed at the 325 Blake Road development. Small pockets of play are a good option for POPs. Finding opportunities to connect to nature in Hopkins should be a priority (Minnehaha Creek canoeing shown). DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 45 value and are worth investment for improvement. Parks and open spaces remain an area that could support more natural areas and native vegetation. Improvements to the tree canopy and conversion of turf grass to native prairie species and low to no maintenance groundcover could significantly contribute to the quality of natural areas in the city and provide more ecosystem services, while reducing maintenance. There are 3 keys to improving natural area quality and experiences in Hopkins parks: 1. Partnerships 2. Increase Access 3. Improve the In-between PARTNERSHIPS The city should leverage partnerships with groups and entities with overlapping goals and objectives. This can occur on a large scale with grants and cost share programs at the State level to the local volunteer organizations and neighborhood groups that provide labor and small scale fundraising. Two key partners that the City should continue to foster relationships with are Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts. Habitat preservation and restoration that supports water quality and flood reduction are significant overlapping goals. Both watershed districts have significant cost share, knowledge sharing, and grant opportunities for aligned projects. Additionally, Three Rivers Parks District (TRPD) is a regional park provider with a mission to support access to nature, environmental education, and improved natural area experiences. At the time of Master Plan authoring, TRPD was starting a Parks to People program that was investigating how to engage more visitors from underrepresented groups in the first ring suburbs of Hennepin County. Hopkins is an active participant in those discussions and should continue their relationship building following this project. Finally, Recreation Services of Minnetonka, who provides programming for Hopkins, could be utilized as a partner for resource sharing and connecting the City to other potential partners. Hopkins is an important part of their recreational offerings and helping to improve the parks would benefit their mission. Smaller scale partners can also provide significant assistance in natural areas improvement. Volunteer groups focusing on invasive 9 Mile Creek at Valley Park is an opportunity to expand access to nature, improve vegetation quality, and extend natural surface trails into the environment. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 46 species removal or tree planting can provide real value for the city, educate residents, and provide opportunities to connect to natural areas and others with similar interests. Non-profit organizations such as Blue Thumb, Wild Ones Twin Cities, Metro Blooms, Great River Greening, and a number of other groups have programs to facilitate habitat improvements. Outdoor recreation focused groups can also provide significant resources for the right project; Minnesota Off Road Cyclists (MORC) has a significant labor force of mountain bike riders that donate thousands of hours each year to maintaining facilities across the metro that include bike optimized natural surface trails. Boy and girl scout troops, the Isaac Walton League, Ducks Unlimited, and others are looking for events and projects for their passionate members. By working with volunteer groups like this, less resources need to be spent by city staff on recruiting and organizing volunteer efforts. INCREASE ACCESS People are inclined to protect and cherish what they understand and what touches their daily lives. Increasing the access to natural areas in the city provides an opportunity for more people to enjoy the benefits of nature, diversifies the recreation opportunities in the city, and provides spontaneous/ unstructured education, play, and experiential opportunities. Increasing access can range from simple, low cost natural surface trail expansion to more costly boardwalk trails and larger restoration projects. Opportunities for increasing access to natural areas in Hopkins includes: • Accessible and natural surface trail expansion at Valley Park and Steiner Park Reserve. • Native and natural planting within neighborhood and community parks - see concept plans in Chapter 4. • Restoration and trail access opportunities at the landfill site. • Accessible improvements to existing park facilities to remove barriers to outdoor recreation • Accessible archery improvements at Steiner Park Reserve IMPROVE THE IN-BETWEEN The spaces between parks are an important part of connecting people to nature. Enhanced urban tree canopies and tree-lined trails make walking and biking to parks more appealing and hospitable. Incorporating shrub and perennial planting into streetscapes and business provide habitat value, but also increase the appeal and visual interest of spaces. All of these improvements help make the overall city and parks more resilient to climate change and increase the physical and mental connection to nature. Urban tree canopy is a an important part of making the spaces between parks more appealing. Street trees help regulate summer temperatures and provide shelter and scale for pedestrians and bicyclists. Perennial plantings and shrubs create critical habitat for pollinators and small mammals. These small gestures can turn into a larger feature when they are connected and begin to connect larger habitat patches in parks. These spaces don’t need to be fully maintained as pristine prairie or woodland remnants. Adjusting maintenance to allow for higher growing grasses can provide value. Cues to care can be maintained by mowing strips along trails and sidewalks and placing educational signage. Trees, shade, native plantings, benches and seating along trails and sidewalks make benefit park users and wildlife. DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 47 Parks represent the neighborhoods and communities they are a part of. Appearance, quality, vegetation management can impact the attractiveness to potential users and can be a reflection of the community and it’s pride. Conversely, equipment that is in disrepair, aged, or outdated is likely to be used less frequently over time. REFLECTION OF COMMUNITY Hopkins parks are adequately maintained by staff. Lawns are regularly mowed, trees and shrubs trimmed and growing well, and perennial beds weed free and abundant. However, much of the parks equipment is outdated, fading, and in disrepair. Playgrounds, courts and equipment, benches, signage, tables, grills, etc. have a lifespan for safety. These elements also have an aesthetic lifespan. Faded colors, chipping paint, and significant scuffing can be detrimental to the amenities usage and signify a lower level of care. Hopkins multi-use fields and lawns are mowed and well maintained. However, many of them do not have a cross section of proper soils and drainage, or irrigation, that will support a higher level of field quality. Higher quality fields can support more regular use and greater programming in a variety of weather conditions. Quality fields are also more attractive to users, associations, and tournament organizers. The city’s most active park, Central, has a large turf field area built over a historic landfill. This turf zone undulates significantly and prevents safe use of the fields for any activity - rendering the ball diamond useless. This issue should be addressed to support the increasing demand that Central Park will get as the population near light rail increases. This area will need to be repaired or re-calibrated with other more compatible uses. New, well designed, facilities provide a significant boost to the image, desirability, and attractiveness of the parks. The new splash pad and building at Burnes Park, The Pavilion, pickleball courts at Central Park, and pavilion at Cottageville Park are examples of successful investment. QUALITY SUPPORTS QUANTITY Hopkins has limited acreage available for additional field and court space. Existing facilities will need to support greater useage to meet the anticipated need as the city’s population grows. Improving the FOCUS ON QUALITY quality of fields and courts is vital to ensure programming and infor- mal use are accommodated. Key fields at community and select neighborhood parks that receive regular scheduled usage should be constructed as premier fields. These fields should have an adequate drainage base to ensure playability after storm events and spring thaw. Drainage is key to protecting the field surfacing from use before the rootzone has had a chance to dry out. Good drainage minimizes cancellations due to weather. Natural turf premier fields should also have an irrigation system to ensure turf quality throughout the year. These improve- ments will maximize the use of facilities for play throughout the year. More people will be able to use the fields for a broader timeframe. Additional improvements to premier facilities that will extend play- ability even further include lighting and artificial surfacing. Artificial surfaces maximize playability following weather events, earlier play in the spring, and later play into the fall. Damage to turf is eliminat- ed and there is no ‘rest period’ needed to allow recovery from heavy use. Negative characteristics of artificial turf are that it is known to be a significantly hotter play surface during peak summer months, there are increased injury reports, concerns about exposure to crumb rubber infill and long term health effects, and the initial high capital costs. Hopkins should evaluate the use of artificial fields only at the highest useage fields. Lighting can help substantially improve field and court quality by extending the times that facility is able to be used. This is critical in spring and fall periods when reduced daylight hours restrict time- frames the facilities are able to be used. Lit fields and courts can in- crease programming opportunities. Newer lighting technology and fixtures can provide precise placement of light and minimize spillage and light pollution in surrounding neighborhoods. LIFECYCLE REPLACEMENT & PLAYGROUNDS Burnes and Cottageville Parks have recently been renovated. However, the remaining parks in the system need to be addressed. Nearly all of the playgrounds in the system are over seven years old. A replacement plan needs to be developed to update the system now and into the future so the city doesn’t fall behind. All equipment in the system has a shelf and replacement life that should be the baseline for parks improvement. Scheduling updates, maintenance, Low quality and outdated facilities requiring significant maintenance should be evaluated for replacement or removal - Harley Hopkins Shelter & Central Park Playground Revitalize existing fields, facilities, courts, and playgrounds. DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 48 Existing playgrounds are similar in age, style, and play value.A variety of playground experiences and types to fit all of Hopkins parks, elevate the quality, and encourage travel. DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 49 and replacement is a way to ensure the system stays current and safe. Playground replacement strategies should encourage quality and variety. Choosing 2-3 well regarded vendors to work with will help assure the city finds the best combination of cost, variety, and quality. Working with a licensed Landscape Architect with park design experience can ensure the city is cognizant of playground and recreation trends, manufacturers, and integration of new equipment into the parks. Playground creativity and development has expanded considerably in the last few years and Minnesota has a number of quality manufacturers to work with. Diversity in play experience is vital to a high quality play experience. Hopkins should be mindful of this when planning individual parks with neighborhoods. Getting input from the public and matching the play facility with the park setting is advised to diversify the play options over time. An example would be to match natural playgrounds in more natural parks and more active play options, like a ninja warrior course, in more active parks. All other equipment should be tracked and replaced per recommendations and prior to equipment failure. Schedules spread distribute the cost burden over time. Significant investment should utilize the equity analysis framework to prioritize improvements. MATCHING RESOURCES Maintaining a high-quality park system requires money, time, and effort. Hopkins currently has sufficient staff for park maintenance but will need to adjust as the population grows. The city will need to identify new sources of funding for capital improvements, new amenities, and general maintenance. The following methods could be utilized to match resources to need: • Consider tiered fee structure for some amenities including dog parks to offset maintenance costs • Formalize a volunteer agreement for associations and general public maintenance • Implement maintenance standards and realistic staffing strategy • Evaluating the long-term cost of investments - e.g. using sustainable and durable building materials • Parking lot, street reconstruction, and stormwater improvements associated with parks should be funded separately DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 50 PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 51 The following plans illustrate how half of Hopkins Parks could be improved. The plans were developed from public feedback, staff input, and known needs within the system. They show what a modern updated park could look like and are intended to inspire investment that is prioritized using the priority themes and equity analysis. City staff selected the parks for these representative park concept designs. Concept plans for Elmo Park, Burnes Park, Cottageville Park, Maetzold Field, Hiawatha Oaks, Interlachen Park, Shady Oak Park and Beach are not included. However, all parks will be updated as equipment ages, and in order by equipment age and equity priority. The parks that are included are of high need from an equity standpoint, span a range of sizes, and provide good examples for how the entire system can be improved. More engagement should be done prior to design and construction to determine the final amenities and configuration. This is especially important as needs may change in the time before implementation occurs. Icons representing the main themes identified are provided to highlight the focus of each park concept in addressing these vital elements. Each park strives to address all of the vision priorities, but the icons highlight which are served in the highest capacity. 05 VISUALIZING HOPKINS FUTURE PARKS OF THE 15 HOPKINS PARKS, SEVEN RECEIVED CONCEPT PLANS IN THIS MASTER PLAN D E 3 1 2 15 14 12 13 8 7 11 10 9 A BC 16 17 6 54 CLOCK TOWER ALICE SMITH ELEMENTARY CENTER FOR THE ARTS PLAZA ARTERY / 8th AVE TRAIL EISENHOWER ELEMENTARY ACTIVATION AREAS A D B E C ELMO PARK HILLTOP PARK MAETZOLD FIELD CENTRAL PARK DOWNTOWN PARK BURNES PARK HARLEY HOPKINS COTTAGEVILLE HIAWATHA OAKS OAKES PARK INTERLACHEN PARK BUFFER PARK PARK VALLEY VALLEY PARK 11th AVE SOUTH SHADY OAK BEACH CITY-OWNED PARKS = Park with Concept Plan HOPKINS LANDFILL 1 2 3 5 6 7 10 9 8 11 12 # 13 14 16 15 17 4 SCHOOL PARKS CITY OF HOPKINS 52 Building Better Parks - Intentional Design The park system in Hopkins has several positive qualities that will allow for a smooth and positive transformation. Parks in Hopkins are: • well located and distributed geographically; • easy to access due to the community’s scale - a majority of Hopkins is walkable and bike-able; • well connected to a growing network of regional and local trails; • and are sources of neighborhood identity - people naturally gravitate toward and identify with the park near their neighborhood. Parks also provide: • proximity and connections to surrounding community amenities, regional trails, and other cities’ parks; • recreation programming that utilizes a broader geographic spread of facilities to provide more options for Hopkins residents; • proximity to transportation corridors and businesses for larger community parks that host league events and tournaments which benefit from: • freeway access; • access to bars and restaurants on Mainstreet; • easy connections to future light rail station areas; and • regional trail connections. These existing qualities are a solid foundation to build upon. The city should focus on improving and updating the parks to better reflect the population they are serving. Improvements should be mindful of the entire system and increase an individual park’s ability to provide more benefit to the community. Community focused design and planning are crucial to achieve the highest cost/benefit for each park. Qualified Landscape Architects and park planners should lead a comprehensive community based design process to re-envision the parks as funding allows. Each park’s potential must be maximized to provide the greatest cost/ benefit to the community. Design is the best tool that can achieve this lofty ambition. Below is an example of a park transformation which is covered in detail in the following pages. Formerly lacking careful design, Buffer park is transformed by activating with varied activities primarily intended for younger ages. The park is enlivened with a tee ball or practice infield, two under 9 soccer fields, a tot track and basic bike skills area, as well as a shade structure for community gathering. Parks should not be a place for individual pet projects and one-off facilities. The spatial, recreational, and green infrastructure needs and pressures of the community are too great to continue ad-hoc additions. The following chapter provides a vision for how design and park planning can transform some of the key parks in Hopkins and how the system can be transformed These transformations need to be based on community needs and thoughtfully designed to help achieve the city-wide vision and mission. Buffer ParkHopkins Park Systems Plan Hopkins, MN December 21, 2022 |22050 NORTH 0' 10' 20'40'80' SCALE: 1"=20'Buffer ParkHopkins Park Systems Plan Hopkins, MN December 21, 2022 |22050 NORTH 0' 10' 20'40'80' SCALE: 1"=20' OPEN FIELD MOUND / PLATEAU BALL FIELD PARK SYSTEMS MASTER PLAN Buffer Park - Existing 5th Street S 2nd Ave S Buffer Park existing conditions Buffer Park proposed concept TEE BALL U9 SOCCER U9 SOCCER TOT TRACK / BIKE SKILLS COURSE SHADE STRUCTURE / GATHERING AREA PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 53 4th Street N 20th Ave N20th Ave NLEGEND KEYNOTES LAWN NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY SLEDDING PATH 1 1 5 6 6 7 8 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EXPANDED PARKING EXPANDED PLAYGROUND BUILDING GRILLING AREA DOG RUN BERM & BUFFER PLANTINGS SLEDDING ACCESSIBLE PATH NORTH 0' 15' 30'60'120'06 | Hilltop ParkHopkins Park System Plan Hopkins, MN February 6, 2023 |22050 DOG RUN BERM & BUFFER PLANTINGS EXPANDED PLAYGROUND HILLTOP PARK Proposed improvements at Hilltop Park focus on increasing accessibility and expanding uses. The current playground is not accessible, so this design proposes to expand the playground to add inclusive equipment and features accessible walkways that connect from the parking to the playground. Parking is slightly expanded, with room for a seasonal restroom enclosure at the parking lot edge. A new dog run is proposed, with berms and dense planting at the edges. The sledding hill is maintained. CITY OF HOPKINS 54 CENTRAL PARK PLAYGROUND SHADE STRUCTURE BASKETBALL LEGEND LAWN NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY 1 3 3 3 4 5 10 7 8 9 9 69 KEYNOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DROP-OFF AREA ENTRY PLAZA POTENTIAL EXPANDED PARKING EXPANDED PICKLEBALL DESTINATION PLAYGROUND BASKETBALL & FUTSAL LEAGUE VOLLEYBALL HIGH SCHOOL SOCCER SHADE STRUCTURE INDOOR PAVILION EXPANSION 2 13th Ave S16th Ave S15th Ave SExcelsior Blvd A re-imagined Central Park will have improved safety and easier circulation, made possible by relocating parking to the edges of the park and reopening the middle for a new playground, event lawn, and sports courts. The concept shows new outdoor amenities and a large expansion of the Pavilion that will cover the existing outdoor hockey and tennis court space. New indoor space in this expanded Pavilion includes a second sheet of year-round ice (middle, at current outdoor rink location), turf/ ice rotating (similar to existing Pavilion rink) in the north end, and the existing southern field house becomes year- round turf. Outdoor amenities include new sand volleyball courts, full-court basketball, walking loops, an improved open field that can fit high-school soccer, and expanded pickleball. PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 55 LEGEND LAWN NATIVE/ NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY ENHANCED RESTROOM w/ STORAGE KEYNOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FLEXIBLE LAWN ART/ SCULPTURE RECONFIGURED BERMS/ TERRACE MOVABLE TABLES AND CHAIRS SCULPTURAL PLAYGROUND EXISTING STAGE GARDEN TRELLIS POETRY WALK GREEN/ ART FOCUSED BOULEVARD 2 7 8 9 1 3 4 5 6810th Ave S9th Ave SThe stage and mounds are an important part of Downtown park and will stay, with minor improvements. Mounds are adjusted with terraced seat walls that orient toward the stage, and the round paved area in front of the stage will be adjusted with new surfacing and flexible seating. Seat walls can have memorial plaques. The connection along 9th Ave S will be enhanced with a wider sidewalk and boulevard, and opportunities for outdoor sculptures. New amenities for the park include a small playground, an open flexible lawn, a poetry walk, and garden trellis structures that will provide opportunities for hanging lights, swings, or kinetic sculpture. The concept also shows an enhanced restroom area with an attached storage cabinet for event supplies. DOWNTOWN PARK SCULPTURAL PLAY MOVABLE SEATING STONE TERRACEBERMS ART/ POETRY WALK GARDEN TRELLIS CITY OF HOPKINS 56 LEGEND KEYNOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD ACCESS ACCESSIBLE PATH SHADE STRUCTURE GATHERING AREA RAIN GARDEN SWALE FLEX LAWN FOR GAMES SLOPED LAWN U12 SOCCER HAMMOCK GROVE 1st St SE 2nd St S 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 1 2 2 2 6 LAWN GAMES SHADE STRUCTURE STORMWATER / BIO-RETENTION HAMMOCK GROVE HARLEY HOPKINS PARK LAWN NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY PARK BUILDING AlleyTo improve the park’s usability, stormwater is collected into a rain garden where the current hockey rink is located. New paths loop through the park, providing accessibility. The warming house is removed and replaced with a shade structure and community gathering area with elevated and improved flexible lawn. At the southern end of the park, drainage is improved with additional rain gardens and swales. A soccer field for under twelve (U12) sports fits in the flat open lawn area. The slope from 2nd St S is opened and re-graded to provide a sloped seating area and enhance views into the park. PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 57 1 2 3 45 6 7 9 8 Lake St NE Tyler Ave NPLAYGROUND BASKETBALL WITH FUTSAL STORMWATER / BIO-RETENTION LEGEND LAWN NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY PARK BUILDING SLEDDING PATH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EXISTING PICNIC SHELTER LARGE PARK BUILDING IMPROVED PLAYGROUND BASKETBALL & FUTSAL U12 SOCCER SLEDDING COMMUNITY GARDEN WETLAND/ RAIN GARDEN EXISTING TENNIS OAKES PARK KEYNOTES The redesign of Oakes Park incorporates a range of amenities to cater to the diverse needs of the community. With existing facilities like a picnic shelter and tennis courts, the park maintains its charm while welcoming new features. A new park building, large enough to host classes and city voting, will replace the existing warming house. An improved playground offers a safe and engaging space for children of all abilities, while dedicated basketball and futsal/mini-pitch courts provide opportunities for sports enthusiasts. A U12 soccer field adds excitement for young athletes, and a designated sledding area promises winter fun. Additionally, a community garden encourages residents to cultivate their own plants, fostering a sense of ownership and sustainability. To promote environmental consciousness, a wetland or rain garden is integrated, offering educational value and enhancing the park’s ecological significance. This thoughtfully designed park becomes a vibrant hub for recreation, social interaction, and environmental appreciation. CITY OF HOPKINS 58 PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 59 An improved park building to better serve the community is an important proposed addition to Oakes Park. Envisioned to be similar in size to the warming house at the Pavilion, this new structure could fill an important need for the neighborhood. The existing warming house is too small to house larger civic functions such as voting, and this area of the city lacks a space for this function. The interior should be sized to house voting and any other civic functions that may be needed. The building serves the park as a warming house in winter and can also host recreational programs or be rented for activities such as birthday parties. Furthermore the structure can provide plumbed bathrooms, which was requested in engagement. The views on the previous page and right show potential views of how this park building could look. Sustainability measures include a green roof, solar generation, south-facing windows, energy saving mechanical systems, and the structure should be built from low- carbon materials. Replace with Text from City CITY OF HOPKINS 60 LEGEND LAWN NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY SLEDDING PATH TOT TRACK TEE BALL GATHERING AREA 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 455 6 ACCESSIBLE PATH GATHERING AREA TOT TRACK SLEDDING U9 SOCCER PRACTICE BALL FIELD/ TEE BALL KEYNOTES 5th Street S 2nd Ave S BUFFER PARK Youth sports are the focus of planned improvements at Buffer Park. The baseball infield is reoriented and moved to fit two under nine (U9) youth soccer fields. The sledding hill is preserved, however, the plateau at the top of the hill features added paths, a shade structure with seating, and a new tot track (for all-wheel skills practice). Additionally this plan recommends the city consider re-naming this park to something more meaningful to the community. PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 61 Valley Park The park design focuses on maintaining the open field while incorporating new elements to enhance inclusiveness and recreation. A dedicated dog run will be added, providing a safe and enjoyable space for furry companions to socialize and exercise. The park will undergo transformations and expansions to ensure accessibility and be inclusive for all community members. This includes incorporating features such as accessible pathways, seating areas, and inclusive play equipment in the playground. Additionally, to cater to basketball enthusiasts, the design includes both a bank shot court and a full court, providing opportunities for players of all skill levels to enjoy the game. This park design aims to create a welcoming and engaging environment that promotes physical activity, social interaction, and the joy of being outdoors for everyone in the community. Steiner Park Preserve and Valley Park Trails New trails at Steiner Park Preserve prioritize connectivity and ecological preservation. An updated path network establishes better connections to nearby trails, encouraging residents to explore and enjoy the surrounding natural areas. Additionally, a newly restored wetland area becomes a focal point, providing valuable habitat for wildlife. To enhance the experience, wildlife viewing stations are strategically placed, allowing visitors to observe and appreciate the diverse species that call the wetland home. This park design seamlessly blends recreational opportunities with environmental stewardship, providing a harmonious and immersive experience for park- goers of all ages. RAPTOR POLE BAT HOUSES ADAPTIVE 3-D TARGETS EXISTING TARGETS SHADE/ PAVILION BIRD BLIND LEGEND NEW PAVED TRAIL EXISTING PAVED TRAIL NEW NATURAL SURFACE TRAIL EXISTING NATURAL SURFACE TRAIL NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL WETLAND RESTORATION PROPERTY BOUNDARY NEW PARK SHELTER OR BUILDING LOOP MILEAGE RAPTOR POLE ACCESSIBLE LOOP AROUND GARDENS ADAPTIVE ARCHERY IMP. NATURE LOOP IMPROVEMENTS BIRD BLIND DITCH RESTORATION: • RE-ALIGNMENT • WATER QUALITY IMP. • NATURAL TRAIL CONNECTION • HIGHWAY BUFFER THIS AREA IS ON NEXT PAGE 1.2 1.2 .35 .75 .70 VALLEY & STEINER PARKS CITY OF HOPKINS 62 BANK SHOT DOG RUN HILLSIDE WATER PLAY CLIMBING/ HILLSIDE PLAY INCLUSIVEPLAYGROUND LEGEND LAWN NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY PARK BUILDING SLEDDING PATH KEYNOTES 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 4 4 6 5 7 6 8 7 9 8 10 9 1110 12 11 13 12 13 EXISTING PICNIC SHELTER LARGE PARK BUILDING ACCESSIBLE PATH INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUND BANK SHOT BASKETBALL HILLSIDE ROCKS & WATER PLAY DOG PARK NEW SHADE STRUCTURE & STORAGE SLEDDING BASEBALL PRACTICE OPEN FIELD W/ ROOM FOR RUGBY EXISTING HOCKEY 8th Ave S We s t b r o o k e W a y9th Ave S8th Ave S7th Ave S6th Ave SVALLEY PARK PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 63 PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC SPACES (POPS) Hopkins will need additional park acreage as the population continues to grow. As development occurs, access to open space and public amenities will be at a premium. Open space is an important component of both economic development and quality of civic life. Some previous developments such as the Gallery Flats have been less successful at creating an open, welcoming Privately Owned Public Space (POPS). However, the City is working with developers at 325 Blake and Trilogy to better tailor public space within the development to the neighborhoods’ needs. The Artery adjacent to the Moline is also a positive example of planning for POPS. This plan recommends that Hopkins hire a consultant to research other local cities ordinances on Parkland Dedication and provide policy recommendations for POPS to ensure that developers do their part to contribute to the community’s needs. Such a policy should contain a definition of POPS or “private land maintained for public use” as well as requirements for access, maintenance, and that the land remain publicly accessible for a specified duration. This consultant should also make recommendations that planners and City officials can use in Permitting or Plan Review to make sure requirements are met, and ensure appropriate amenities within these new quasi-public spaces. Shown at right is one example of how a new POP can be implemented. Should the City decide to partner in order to redevelop a parking lot near a park, the illustration shows how a building could provide amenities and additional space to complement the park. Residents and City staff both spoke of a need for a permanent public bathroom downtown, and this shows one design solution to realize this need, as well as activate the park space. LEGEND LAWN NATIVE/ NO-MOW TREE PATHWAY ENHANCED RESTROOM KEYNOTES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FLEXIBLE LAWN ART/ SCULPTURE RECONFIGURED BERMS/ TERRACE MOVABLE TABLES AND CHAIRS SCULPTURAL PLAYGROUND EXISTING STAGE GARDEN TRELLIS POETRY WALK GREEN/ ART FOCUSED BOULEVARD 2 7 8 9 1 3 4 5 68 CAFE RestroomsStorage CITY OF HOPKINS 64 Future Forest at Osborn 370/ Ecolab Plaza St Paul, MN Temporary interactive information gathering art installation. Hopkins is already running a successful outdoor sculpture program, but this type of installation invites a different kind of interaction and provokes more dialog. Future of futures: https://amandalovelee.com/Future-of- Futures Art installation and photo by Amanda Lovelee The Porch at 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA Activation of a narrow area adjacent to a transit hub. The Porch, located on the south side of 30th Street Station, is one of Philadelphia’s premier public spaces. The Porch features pop-ups including food trucks and performances, lush landscaping, and plenty of places to relax. University City District: https://www.universitycity.org/ events/porch The Porch, photo by University City District Examples of Small Privately Owned Public Spaces JXTA Plaza Minneapolis, MN Skate park in tight urban plaza City of Skate (CoS) partnered with Juxtaposition Arts (JXTA) on the JXTA Skate-able Art Plaza. JXTA students and staff designed the skate plaza with help from CoS. The plaza combines skateboarding, flexible open space, art installations, and sustainable stormwater management to create a unique public space in the heart of North Minneapolis. City of Skate: https://cityofskate.org/ skateparks/juxtaposition-arts-skatepark- north-minneapolis/ JXTA Plaza, photo by Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Canadian Pacific Plaza Minneapolis, MN Tennis activation during Aquatennial annual summer celebration A great example of using POPS space employing temporary activation. The tiered seating and plaza is available year around. Business Journal: https://www.bizjournals. com/twincities/news/2014/07/18/ aquatennial-tennis-classic-still-draws- minneapolis.html Canadian Pacific Plaza, before and during Aquatennial, photo by the business journals PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 65 Placemaking is an Urban Design and Planning term that refers to strategies used to improve the quality of public spaces and make them more welcoming. Generally speaking Placemaking is a process to give a space an identity and vibrancy and can take the form of physical improvements and/or programming (activation). Project for Public Spaces (PPS) defines Placemaking as “a collaborative process by which we can shape our public realm in order to maximize shared value. More than just promoting better urban design, placemaking facilitates creative patterns of use, paying particular attention to the physical, cultural, and social identities that define a place and support its ongoing evolution.” (https://www.pps. org/article/what-is-placemaking) Collaboration is important to emphasize, as the most successful placemaking efforts involve substantial community engagement. PPS reinforces this by saying that placemaking can improve health, happiness, and well-being when anchored by the community’s vision. In addition, we can measure the success of a placemaking effort by how well used and loved the space is. Success means a welcoming space that is full of people, offers seating and shade, is comfortably lit, conveys a sense of safety, and offers activities. The Hopkins Center for the Arts (HCA) is a well-established cultural institution at the heart of Mainstreet. At right, an illustration provides suggested methods to activate and enhance the plaza along the primary facade of the HCA. Currently the plaza lacks amenities and shade, and does not encourage visitors to linger. The example design proposes new digital displays or projectors to enliven blank areas of the facade and provide information about upcoming events or theatrical performances. New platforms provide areas for street buskers (outdoor performers) or provide space to display sculpture. Additional bike amenities are provided, as well as increased shade, to provide easy access and comfort. Curb bump-outs at either end of the block increase safety for pedestrians along Mainstreet, and provide a better crossing experience to nearby businesses or attractions. PLACEMAKING Existing conditions at Mainstreet and Hopkins Center for the Arts CITY OF HOPKINS 66 Existing Mainstreet PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 67 LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SCULPTURE PAD/ BUSKING STAGE PLATFORM SEATING WITH INTEGRATED TREE CURVED BENCH STORMWATER PAVER TREE TRENCH MULTI-FUNCTIONAL AUDIO/ VISUAL LIGHT COLUMN WALL MURAL/ VIDEO PROJECTION SCREEN ART INSPIRED PERGOLA VERTICAL MARQUEE STYLE SIGN 12th Ave NMAINSTREET 11th Ave NWALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN FRONT PORCH: ELEVATED PLATFORM, ARTFUL STRUCTURE, STAGE, SEATING, WITH INTEGRATED RAMP NATIVE SHRUB BED ADA RAMP CROSSING BUMP-OUT CROSSING BUMP-OUT STORMWATER TREE TRENCH AV POLE AV POLE MOVABLE SEATING FRONT PORCH ARTFUL BIKE RACK SCULPTURE / STAGE WOOD SEAT / STAGE BUS STOP SEASONAL PLANTINGS IN PLANTERS 1 5 5 5 6 7 8 8 2 33 4 4 6 AV POLE WITH SHADE SAILS Placemaking at Hopkins Center for the Arts Examples of marquee and building signage that could work with the facade CITY OF HOPKINS 68 KEYNOTE IMAGE REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 69 New Amenities - icons below indicate where new amenities are proposed to be added in parks with concept plans CITY OF HOPKINS 70 Amenities included in Concepts Location Building Expansion Larger building at Valley and Oakes, Pavilion expansion at Central Shade structure Hilltop, Downtown, Harley Hopkins, Buffer Splash pad Valley Basketball Central, Oakes Pickleball Central Volleyball Central Rugby Valley Dog Park Hilltop, Valley Soccer Central, Oakes, Buffer, Harley Hopkins Baseball / Softball Valley, tee-ball at Buffer Bike Skills Buffer Ice Skating Central New Playground Downtown New Trails Hilltop, Harley Hopkins, Buffer, Valley Amphitheater Downtown Other Needs Identified Location How to incorporate beyond parks Softball Tournament Complex no space currently Leagues continue to rent from neighbors Soccer Fields, Practice Areas Central Park, Buffer Park, Oakes Park Hockey - Dome or Pavilion Expansion Central Park Permit-able or Rentable Space Downtown Park, Oakes Park, Valley Park Futsal Mini-Pitch Central Park, Oakes Park POPS Increase shade canopy Should be in all parks POPS Gathering areas Should be in all parks POPS Bike racks Should be in all parks POPS Drinking fountain Should be in most parks POPS Seating areas Should be in all parks POPS Accessible walking paths Should be in all parks POPS Restroom (sewer connected or port-a-potty) Should be in all parks POPS Signage and wayfinding Should be in all parks POPS Translations - online and on signs Should be in all parks POPS Update online inventory of facilities Should be done for all parks CITY OF HOPKINS PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN CREATING A 20-YEAR VISION FOR THE HOPKINS PARK SYSTEM2023 DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS II DRAF T PARK SYSTEM PLAN : 2023 III TABLE OF CONTENTS XX. XX. XX. XX. XX. XX. XX. PROJECT & PLANNING PROCESS Purpose of this project, Project Timeline, and Corresponding Planning Efforts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Key points of the Park System Plan goals and findings THE PARKS HOPKINS NEEDS Identifying what needs must be met. PARK SYSTEM VISION Where do we want to go? What key themes inform the direction. VISUALIZING HOPKINS FUTURE PARKS Concept Plans for seven high-priority parks, system-wide recommendations for Placemaking and Privately-Owned Public Space HOW WE GET THERE How do we get where we want to go? APPENDIX Full documentation including meeting records and assessments CHAPTER 01 CHAPTER 03 THE PARKS HOPKINS HAS Analysis of Hopkins current parks. CHAPTER 02 XX. CHAPTER 04 CHAPTER 05 CHAPTER 06 DRAF T CITY OF HOPKINS 74 DRAFTSUMMARY OF IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS Topic Goals Strategies Timeline Resources Needed Funding Opportunities Parks are Essential 1. Elevate maintenance of existing parks Develop maintenance standards; plan for deferred maintenance; update park inventory; create a maintenance schedule for each new amenity added 2. Reinvest in parks Increase funding for planning and capital projects; develop individual park plans; monitor recreation trends and continue to engage the community 3. Programming to match community demographics Continue to engage with the community to understand evolving needs; leverage partners to explore new opportunities to expand program offerings; evaluate and refine pricing strategies to remove cost barriers Basic Park Services 1. Improve circulation and access Prioritize accessibility; provide internal loop trails in neighborhood and community parks; provide seating and shade 2. Establish essential amenities Provide drinking fountains where feasible; place year-round portable restrooms near popular athletic fields and trails where water and sewer access is not feasible; provide recycling and waste receptacles; maintain and increase healthy canopy cover 3. Welcome all cultures Provide restrooms with running water where feasible; create gathering areas at all parks to accommodate larger group gatherings; integrate translation for key park communications 4. Provide structure for dog owners Develop off-leash facilities; provide dog waste stations; develop and enforce leash laws; provide safe water sources; collaborate with partner organizations. Flexible Fields and Diamonds 1. Balance diamonds and rectangular multi-use fields Transition underutilized diamonds to flexible rectangular fields; evaluate opportunities to integrate higher quality practice diamond facilities; integrate additional multi-purpose fields and diamonds in parks that can accommodate field size 2. Improve field quality and increase use Develop an outdoor artificial turf field, or sand-based irrigated turf field; provide lighting for existing higher quality diamond and rectangular fields to extend usable hours; improve existing drainage issues; expand indoor fields at the Pavilion; explore an outdoor covered facility at Central Park that can be programmed year round (similar facilities exist in St. Louis Park and Edina) Timeline Key Resources Needed Key 0-5 years Low 5-15 years Medium 15-20+ years High PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN : 2023 75 DRAFTTopic Goals Strategies Timeline Resources Needed Funding Opportunities Courts and Sports 1. Enhance basketball Add more full court basketball facilities with adjustable hoops; add bankshot; combine basketball with adjacent hardscape such as skate plazas; consider younger players and provide smaller scale courts and hoops where feasible 2. Balance pickleball and tennis courts Increase pickleball opportunities; search for pickleball opportunities in north- central or northwest areas of the city; consider non-traditional opportunities such as indoor courts at vacant commercial areas; partner with Blake School to host tennis programs and leagues; recommend pickleball or tennis courts within POPS Playgrounds and Aquatics 1. Continue making playgrounds accessible Follow upcoming ADA recommendations; develop at least one fully-inclusive playground; balance poured-in-place rubber and/or artificial turf surfacing with wood mulch to make playgrounds accessible for all mobility levels; prioritize shade and seating at all playgrounds. 2. Diversify play offerings throughout the city Select 2-3 preferred vendors that provide high quality, creative approaches to play and can work with different budget needs; utilize community engagement to identify the type, style, theme, and amenities the neighborhood wants; install a nature playground 3. Develop a signature playground A signature playground will attract regional visitors and become a source of pride for the city; locate in Central Park (see concept designs). 4. Provide a new aquatic facility west of Highway 169 and south of Excelsior Boulevard Consider an interactive water play feature at Valley Park instead of a traditional splash pad 5. List interactive water features as a recommended amenity in future POPS Operations and maintenance by a private owner will place less burden on the city Skate Parks and all- wheel facilities 1. Integrate an all-wheel facility in Hopkins See concept plans for suggested integration into parks (Buffer Park tot track) 2. Establish a publicly-accessible skateboard focused skate park Closure of Underpass Skate Park leaves the city without an important recreation facility; consider the Depot site for a future skate park 3. Include bike-optimized natural surface trails The Hopkins landfill site provides an opportunity for a specialized downhill facility Timeline Key Resources Needed Key 0-5 years Low 5-15 years Medium 15-20+ years High CITY OF HOPKINS 76 DRAFTTopic Goals Strategies Timeline Resources Needed Funding Opportunities Green Resilience 1. Improve tree canopy and park vegetation Diversify tree canopies in parks; identify areas to naturalize in parks to diversify groundcover, reduce mowing needs, and reduce chemical inputs; develop a program for tree replacement and major storm damage repair 2. Parks as green infrastructure Coordinate with local Watershed Districts on projects to reduce, reuse, and recycle stormwater runoff; minimize impervious surfaces in parks 3. Healthy operations and maintenance Dedicate staff to natural resources and urban tree canopy; consider developing a Natural Resource Management Plan to inventory and provide specific recommendations on improvement; continue facilitating composting and recycling in the park system; develop a park resilience action plan to efficiently adapt to climate change effects 4. Lead by example with park development and buildings All new park building facilities and major park renovations should follow recommendations of the Hopkins Heat Vulnerability Study at a minimum. State funded projects will need to follow the Buildings, Benchmarks, and Beyond (B3) Guidelines. 5. Connect more people with more nature Provide more accessible natural areas and connections to outdoor experiences though out the park system Invest in the Future 1. Identify dedicated capital improvement funding for existing park updates and added recreational facilities Consider referendum and/or a local option sales tax to secure needed improvement dollars for community park facilities; explore and apply for grants in multiple categories – natural resources, equity, stormwater, accessibility, etc. to implement master planning goals and objectives; continue developing funding partnerships to achieve joint goals. Examples include watershed district funding at Cottageville Park. 2. Develop an economic impact plan for Hopkins Parks to analyze and communicate the benefit of parks to the city Include the approximate value of homes near parks, trails, and natural areas. Include business analyses with events and festival hosting in Mainstreet at community parks. 3. Generate additional revenue in parks Explore food and beverage opportunities at key parks that complement, but don’t compete, with local businesses; maximize the rental opportunities in parks Timeline Key Resources Needed Key 0-5 years Low 5-15 years Medium 15-20+ years High PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN : 2023 77 DRAFTTopic Goals Strategies Timeline Resources Needed Funding Opportunities Invest in the Future (continued from previous page) 4. Track costs and revenues per amenity and program annually Work with Hopkins-Minnetonka Joint Recreation to track programming costs and revenues; set pricing policies based on classification of core essential, important, and value-added services as well as the level of public and private good that exists 5. Encourage other organizations to support the development and maintenance of the park system. Consider establishing a Foundation or encouraging not-for-profit partnerships that help raise funds and advocate for parks and open spaces 6. Maximize the value and effectiveness of partnerships and volunteers Establish and update partnership agreements on a yearly basis to eliminate non-equitable spending by one partner over another; ensure written partnership agreements that bind each partner in an accountable manner. All obligations and agreements should determine the true cost of each partner’s investment in the partnership; develop a volunteer program for park maintenance 7. Ensure development and park renovation investments meet population increase needs Hopkins currently collects $5,000 per residential unit to help accommodate development that increases the number of units, proportionate to the additional need for parks created by the development. The consultant team feels this is currently appropriate and aligned toward the higher rates compared to similar sized communities; prioritize POPS activities and amenities that address a city- wide Level of Service need 8. Streamline the organization to stretch the public's dollar Create asset management plans based on equity, efficiency, and effectiveness of resources; resource spending on operations and capital improvements should be tracked and recorded to assess and demonstrate fairness and equity in serving community needs; develop organization policies should be determined by industry best practices regarding personnel, work culture, training, and safety of staff to ensure the most efficient and effective service delivery; parks should conduct a service evaluation to gauge the community’s satisfaction and assess operations, adequacy of staffing and budget, and response to resident needs; develop or update business plans for revenue producing facilities Timeline Key Resources Needed Key 0-5 years Low 5-15 years Medium 15-20+ years High