CR 95-163 South Metro Public Safety Training Center
.
.
.
1 ','
o
September 15, 1995
v ;
~
.y '"
rJ ,:.
P r \
CR Report 95-163
South Metro Public Safety Training Center
Proposed Action
Staff recommends that the City Council direct that Hopkins be one of the cities included in making
applications and requests for capital funds for the South Metro Public Safety Training Center.
Overview
For over a year, the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Richfield and the metropolitan Airports
Commission have explored the concept of developing a joint public safety (police and fire) training
center. Recently, the cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka have been asked to join this consortium.
As explained in the following memorandum, the need for such a facility is becoming critical. Such police
training facilities as firing ranges and SWAT courses are closing and/or becoming more remote. Similarly,
fire training opportunities are limited as stricter M.P.C.A. and a.S.RA. rules limit live fire training. At
the same time, mandated training for police and fire personnel is increasing in quantity and complexity.
The proposal which has been developed is a very cost effective way to provide much-needed and
much-improved training. It would provide a environmentally safe live-flame training system for
firefighters, one which could also be rented by fire departments outside of the consortium.
The capital cost of the proposed Center is estimated to be $4.8 million. A strategy (identified in the
following memorandum) has been developed which would have this cost paid by others--the State, the
Federal government, Hennepin County--and by moneys in the MAC's drug forfeiture fund.
It is difficult to place firm figures on what each city's share of the net operations costs would be since the
facility would not be in operation until 1997 at the earliest. A formula needs to be developed, probably
within the structure of a joint powers organization. Some greater economies will occur in current outlays
for training, and they can be credited toward each city's eventual net cost. Although further analysis of
these costs is underway, it appears that the average yearly additional net cost per city would be in the
$15,000-30,000 range. Hopkins, having fewer fire fighters and police officers than other cities should
have reduced participation cost.
Primary Issues to Consider
o Where will the money come from for this training?
Part of the funds will come from money currently being spent on training. Additional training
opportunities as well as facility operation cost will probably require some additional funding.
Supportin2 Information
o September IS, 1995 memo from Craig Dawson
George Ma oal, Fire Chief,
Earl Johnson, Police Chief
.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Managers of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins,
Minnetonka, Richfield
Executive Director Metropolitan Airports Commission
FROM: Police and Fire Training Officers &
Craig Dawson, Assistant to the City Manager, Eden Prairie
DATE: September 15, 1995
SUBJECT: Progress Report;
Support for Funding Applications and Update on South Metro Public Safety
Training Center
.
For the past several months, public safety training officers for Bloomington, Eden Prairie,
Edina, Richfield, and the MAC have been developing plans for a police and fire training
facility which is conveniently located for these communities. Recently, Hopkins and
Minnetonka have expressed an interest in being part of the consortium which would be
developing a South Metro Public Safety Training Center. This approach would meet the
increasing training needs and requirements of 13 agencies--seven police departments and six
fire departments (all except the MAC's). Scheduling models have shown that the police and
fire training facilities would have a high rate of utilization by the member cities.
Capital Costs: The capital cost for the facility on a site by the Braemar complex in Edina is
estimated to be $4.8 million. A working group of the city managers has identified an
approach in which these costs could be covered by grants and restricted-use funds:
$ 2,000,000 from the State of Minnesota through the Governor's Bonding Bill
1,300,000 from the federal COPS Program (1994 Crime Bill)
1,000,000 from the MAC through Drug Forfeiture Funds
500.000 from Hennepin County to complement the Maple Grove facility
$ 4,800,000
The Governor's Bonding Bill is a key component of this plan. In order for the Training
Center to be considered as part of the Governor's proposal, an application will need to be
submitted in October. It is critical for the governing boards to indicate their endorsement to
prepare and submit the application. Similarly. they should also indicate their support to
. make an a'vvlication for a federal COPS grant.
.
City Managers re: South Metro Public Safety Training Center
September 15, 1995
Page Two
Operational Costs: The working group of training officers have identified three approaches
to operate and maintain the Center. Both the training officers and city managers prefer the
model in which a well-qualified training coordinator would run the facility. Gross
operational costs would be in the $250,000 - $275,000/year range, figures which include a
$SO,OOO/year outlay for capital maintenance and improvement projects for Center. Estimated
revenues for direct costs would be $30,000 to $40,000.
Other revenues may come from other agencies who rent the facilities (e.g., the firing range,
live-fire training tower,) or whose staff enroll for classes and training. This additional
revenue is not critical for the economical operation of the Center, but represents an
opportunity to reduce the net cost to the member cities/MAC.
Additional Costs and Savin~s: Trainine: Enhancements: Further study is underway to
identify more definitively what economies the participating agencies will see from using the
Training Center approach. Some quick math would suggest that each of the 13 public safety
agencies would need to pay about $20,000 annually toward the net operations cost of the
Center. But these costs would be offset by more economical use of funds already used in
conjunction with training.
.
*
Overtime: A centrally-located facility would permit training during regular shift
assignments, thus reducing the need to pay overtime and "back-fill" schedules so that
shifts are properly staffed while others are in training. Records indicate that Eden
Prairie and Richfield spent $17,000 and $10,400, respectively, on overtime for
training.
*
Another example is opportunity cost: It is estimated that Eden Prairie, for example,
would spend $5,000 annually to travel to and from the Maple Grove firing range.
This outlay could be redirected to patrol in the community.
*
Travel Expenses: Transportation, lodging, and meal expenses typically make up one-
half to two-thirds of the cost of attending training opportunities outside the
metropolitan area. Much of the training requiring out-of-area travel could be brought
to the Center, thus reducing these additional expenses. Alternatively, these budgeted
funds could be used to provide the same training to more staff.
Most of the economy of the Center would accrue to the police departments. Most of the fire
departments among the member cities are volunteer, and training opportunities are limited
due to the lack of buildings available for practice and increasingly stringent regulations from
the EPA, OSHA, and MPCA. The type of live-fire training system which would be
constructed is only affordable if many cities are involved in funding and operating it.
.
The Center would be funded by seven cities representing 13 public safety agencies. Analysis
thus far suggests that each city could see additional net costs of $ 15.000-$20.000/year for
much-improved and much-needed public safety training.
e
City Managers re: South Metro Public Safety Training Center
September 15, 1995
Page Three
Review of the Trainine Center Proposal: The South Metro Public Safety Training Center
is a collaborative effort to provide needed and mandated training for police officers and
firefighters. Approximately 800 law enforcement and firefighting positions exist among the
seven cities (assume for brevity that the MAC is a city). A cooperative approach to meet the
training needs of these personnel will take advantage of economies of scale, leverage
resources, and avoid duplication. It will allow the cities to provide up-to-date, often state-of-
the-art equipment and facilities needed for public safety personnel more affordably than if
they h-ied to do so separately.
The Training Center will address several major needs:
*
Develop and maintain skills
Comply with state and federal mandates
*
*
Lawsuit prevention
Convenient location
*
Firearms practice: There are few outdoor ranges left in the metro area, and they will likely
close. The nearest long-weapons training ranges are in Faribault and St. Cloud. Indoor
ranges have also been closing due to high remodeling costs to comply with new OSHA
e requirements, and as firearms technology has exceeded capacities of existing ranges.
SWAT: Units currently train at Camp Ripley or Fort Dodge, Iowa. Some of their training
could be provided locally if facilities were available.
Fire: Fire departments have traditionally used fire towers or abandoned buildings for fire
training. The only tower left among these cities is an obsolete one in Bloomington on a site
that is being considered for redevelopment. There are few buildings left that are abandoned
or to be demolished for redevelopment on which to practice firefighting tactics. Even these
buildings come with a price tag--for example, the EPA would require a City to remove
asbestos from the building before setting it ablaze. Increasingly stringent OSHA training
standards would require more live-fire training than any of the cities can currently provide.
The Training Center: The South Metro Public Safety Training Center is envisioned to be a
20,000 square-foot training building and a state-of-the-art, computerized live-flame
firefighting training system. The 20,000 square-foot building would include:
*
*
Classrooms
Indoor firing range, with a maximum of 10 short-arms lanes and 4 long-arms lanes
Scenario-based training (e.g., computer/interactive simulations for decision-making in
the use of force)
Ability to function as a satellite emergency operations center (EOC) or a center for
special cases by one or multiple jurisdictions
Canine unit training facilities
*
*
.
*
e
.
.
City Managers re: South Metro Public Safety Training Center
September 15, 1995
Page Four
The firefighting training system would include:
*
A fire tower, a commercial structure, and a residential structure, all of which would
be connected, and which could also be used for SWAT training
A computer controlled firelflame system (using propane), which gives programmed
and improvised fire situations for firefighter response
Quick clean-up to allow for multiple practice sessions by small units, or to make sure
that a whole department gets the same training at about the same time.
*
*
Summary of Benefits:
Better training is affordable:
It will be less expensive to bring instructors to a central training facility than to send
staff to out-of-metro sites for training, seminars, and schools
The fire training system is affordable only through cooperative financing
Standardization of practices among the iurisdictions:
There will be greater safety for police officers and firefighters on joint-jurisdiction
responses. Additionally, there would be a larger pool of staff available for major
response situations
Preparation of training materials could be economized
With common curricula, cities could develop experts on their staffs to become
accredited instructors (and thus save the expense of outside trainers)
Conveniencel24-hour training capability:
It will reduce the need to pay overtime to attend limited training opportunities
It will allow training to be available on any shift, thus meeting the needs of staff (and
their families) working non-standard shifts
It will allow brush-ups on skills and training as needed
It will keep staff nearby if needed to respond to calls in their cities
A vailability to other jurisdictions:
Class offerings would be available to other jurisdictions; tuition would be revenue
Other fire departments would be allowed to rent the fire training system
More benefits to the public safety staffs, the cities, and the communities will be realized than
the ones listed above. Admittedly, it will be difficult to attach dollar figures to many of
them. But few would be realized without this multi-city collaborative initiative.