Loading...
CR 95-153 Amendments To Comprehensive Plan . . e 1 Y () August 29, 1995 o " Co o P 1\ \ '"' Council Report 95-153 AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to approve Resolution 95-76 approvmg changes to the Comprehensive Plan regarding residential housing. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Mr. Gullickson moved and Mr. Schumacher seconded a motion to approve Resolution RZ95-21 recommending approval of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan regarding residential areas. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. In conjunction with discussions as part of preparation of the Economic Development Strategic Plan, there was a concern regarding the number of new multi-family developments that can be constructed within the City. One of the goals and action steps in the Strategic Plan was to specifically review the multi-family housing sites and determine if changes to the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan are appropriate. The first step was to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the new goals and objectives of the residential policies within the City; this was completed last year. Then various sites were rezoned and the Comprehensive Plan land use map amended. Now, the language in the Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended to reflect the new land use objectives for the various sites. Primary Issues to Consider. o What sections need to be removed, amended or added in the Comprehensive Plan? o What are the next steps? o What occurred at the Zoning and Planning meeting? SUDDortin2 Documents. o Analysis of Issues o Resolution 95-76 (;7/ ~-I~ /J~n~ Anderson, AICP Planner CR95-153 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. o What sections need be removed, amended or added in the Comprehensive Plan? The following are sections that need be removed, amended, or added in the Comprehensive Plan to reflect the new direction of the City: LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Page 23 The Hopkins Land Use Plan is illustrated by Figure 3 and includes only minor changes from the present pattern of development, as outlined below. The principal thrust of the Land Use Plan is not to make wholesale change in the pattern of development but, rather, to achieve better quality site planning and use the land in a way that reflects its very limited availability and good access. The policies enunciated on the following pages follow that intention. Page 23 #1 On the fringes of downtown between First Street North and Excelsior Boulevard, single-family and two-family housing, this area will be alIo'Ned to be red6'/Cloped into attached housing such as rental apartments, f-or sale condominiums, and townhouses. maintained as single-family and two-family housing. . Page 24 # 10 The industrial parking lots located north of Second Street Northeast on either side of Tyler Avenue would be allowed to be redeveloped into mid and high density housing. single family housing. PHYSICAL PLAN Page 45 The Downtown Hopkins Land Use Plan is illustrated by Figure 6. Downtown Hopkins is planned to continue its tight-knit pattern of commercial development along either side of Mainstreet extending down to (and in some locations) across Excelsior Boulevard. Commercial activity is targeted in the vicinity of (but not limited to) the four-block-long core from 8th to 12th Avenues. Mid and high density housing surrounds the commercial core along with park and public offices. Low density housing should continue in neighborhoods north of First Street North and ....'cst of 17th L'\venuc. Thus, the plan envisions that the present pattern of commercial, residential, and public land use would be continued with only a few exceptions as follows. e o Morc intense residential development replacing the single family housing between housing between 5th and 7th ,^..venues south of Main street. . CR95-153 Page 3 o More intense residential development replacing the single family housing between 5th and 8th Avenues south of First Street North. o If St. Joseph's Church and School determines that all or part of its parking and playground between 12th and 13th Avenues in not needed, the City will 8110'."/ con',ersion to high density housing. consider single family housing in this location. HOUSING PLAN Page 69 The objectives of the Hopkins Housing Plan are as follows. 2. Rede'lclop cert8ia targeted low density residential or low intensity non residential locations into attached housing. HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT Page 70 . There are certain locations in the community where it has become appropriate to allow and encourage housing redevelopment, and examples are listed below. In these locations, the City has indicated its land use intentions through the Land Use Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and Map. The City will allow the private market to respond to those local controls and will, on a case-by-case basis, consider financial participation in housing redevelopment projects when that is the only means of achieving needed and demonstrable public benefits consistent with this Comprehensive Plan. Examples oflocations for redevelopment to attached housing follow. o The fringes of the DO'.vntOVffl wilmn the boundaries of First Street North, Excelsior Boulevard, and Fifth and Twelfth Avenues. o What are the next steps? o Proposed amendments are approved by City Council. o Proposed amendments are approved by Met Council. o What occurred at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Staff reviewed the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Staff noted that the language amendments reflect the recent amendments to the land use plan. There was no one at the meeting to speak on this issue. . CR9S-IS3 Page 4 . Alternatives. 1. Approve the proposed language changes for the Comprehensive Plan. By approving the proposed changes in the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan will be amended subject to the Metropolitan Council approval. 2. Do not approve the proposed language changes for the Comprehensive Plan. By denying the proposed changes for the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan will not be amended. 3. Continue for further information. lfthe City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. - . Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 95-76 . RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING Mv1END'MENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGARDING RESIDENTIAL AREAS WHEREAS, an application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment, ZN95-12, has been made by the City of Hopkins; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows. 1. That an application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, ZN95-12 was made by the City of Hopkins on July 28, 1995. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published a notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on August 29, 1995: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. That the written comments and analysis of City Staffwere considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED that the application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, fIIN9S-12, is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact. I. That a goal in the City of Hopkins Strategic Plan for Economic Development is to review the multi-family zoned and guided property. 2. That the City has undertaken a detailed analysis of multi-family zoned and/or guided sites in Hopkins. 3. That the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the goals/policies in the Comprehensive Plan, including: o The City will work to provide an overall mixture of residential land use in the City. o The City will work to correct the disproportionate amount of multiple family land uses within the City. o The City will work to provide a balance ofland uses within the City. o The City will seek to provide housing opportunities for people in all segments of the life cycle. 4. That the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are consistent with the future land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan for the properties in question. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for ZN9S-12 is hereby approved based on the following conditions. 1. That the Metropolitan Council approves the Comprehensive Plan amendments. Adopted this 5th day of September, 1995. e Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor ATTEST: J ames A. Genellie, City Clerk