Loading...
CR 94-110 AH Oakridge S ST 1 - m_____ \ y o G "- o . June 16, 1994 ~ ~ Councll Report: 94-110 . 0 IJ K \ '" ASSESSMENT HEARING OAKRIDGE SOUTH STREET RECONSTRUCTION Proposed Action. Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: UMove that Council adopt Resolution 94-57. Resolution for Adoption of the Assessment Role. Proiect 93-17. Oakridqe South Street Reconstruction." Overview. Council at its May 17 meeting considered the proposed assessment roll for the Oakridge South Street Reconstruction project and set a June 21 hearing date. This hearing sets in motion the special assessments to be levied against the properties adjacent to Robinwood Lane, 5th Street North and Elmo Service Road. A public hearing notice has been published and mailed, along with an assessment statement, to every affected property owner. . As of Friday, June 17, no appeals were submitted contesting the proposed assessment. Appeals must be turned in no later than the hearing date. primary Issues to Consider o Project Costs o Basis for assessment amounts o Appeal procedure o Appeals Supportinq Information o Hearing notice o Affidavit of mailing and mailing list o Low bid - Cost Breakdown o Project Costs Worksheet o Assessment Roll o Location map o Resolution 94-57 Superintendent . council Report: 94-110 Page 2 ~ Analysis of Issues o Project Costs The total amount to be assessed was derived from Low Bid - Cost Breakdown and the Project Costs worksheet/Budget sheets. In the first instance the project was broken down into components based on funding sources. Secondly, the various project components were assigned contingency, engineering, and admin/ legal costs. Refer to these two sheets for details. o Basis for assessment amounts Once the residential 70% share of street reconstruction was determined, that amount ($221,433.35) was divided by the total assessable footage of 6326.57 feet on this project. The footage rate derived was $35/FF. In the case of 13 lots on Robinwood Lane, generally with lower density dwellings and more uniform in size, staff totalled the amount generated by their assessable footage and divided that amount by 13 to derive a unit assessment. This was deemed a fairer means of assessment than strictly adhering to an adjusted front footage method. The thirteen lots are uniform in size but have widely diverging frontage on the . Robinwood Lane. In the case of corner lots, staff arrived at assessable footages by taking full footages on the long side of lots, and one-half the footage on short sides. o Appeal procedure Property owners are given the opportunity to approach council with their appeals during the public hearing. Standard appeal forms have been available at City Hall and need to be submitted no later than the hearing date. Staff will make recommendations on all appeals. o Appeals Staff has not received any appeals as of Friday, June 17, 1994 when this report was submitted . . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the city Council of Hopkins, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the Hopkins city Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 21, 1994, to pass upon the proposed special assessments of costs for the reconstruction of streets in Oakridge South, including Robinwood Lane, Elmo Service Road, and 5th street North. The amount to be assessed is $221,433.35. All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing either orally or in writing. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the property owner is filed with the Assessment Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Appeals are due by the hearing date on June 21, 1994. The City Clerk strongly recommends that appeals be submitted to the Assessment Clerk's office by June 14, 1994. Appeal forms will be available at the assessment hearing or at the Assessment Clerk's office at the Hopkins city Hall, 1010 1st 4It Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to MSA section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or city Clerk of the City of Hopkins within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor and City Clerk. Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes section 435.193 to 435.195 the city may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures .to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessment Clerk. Deferment applications should be submitted to the Assessment Clerk by June 14, 1994. The following information shall also apply: 1. The property owner shall have the right to prepay the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without interest from June 21, 1994 to July 21, 1994, to the Assessment Clerk at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the Assessment Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued . to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made by November 29, 1994 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. . 2. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25 percent of the total assessment has been authorized by ordinance. A partial prepayment can only be made prior to November 29, 1994 with interest accrued to the payment date, except that no interest shall be charged if such partial payment is made by July 21, 1994. 3. In the case where accrued interest applies, the rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period, is proposed to be 8 percent commencing on the date of adoption by the city council. Assessments shall be payable in annual installments over a period of 10 years. 4. The amount to be specially assessed against your property is shown on the statement of assessment sent to you by ma i l. This is an important hearing because this is your last opportunity to be heard on the matter of this assessment which affects your property. If you have any questions regarding this assessment, please call the Engineering Department or the Assessment Clerk at 935-8474. . ~1 -?'1 9/ /,.- U ..-' I' ~ / .;-~.... ~ / :;y~ ~ ~d ~fL . James A. Genellie, city Clerk City of Hopkins, Minnesota '/ Publish in Hopkins Sailor, Hopkins, Minnesota June 1 and 8, 1994 . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNCIL OF HOPKINS ) James A. Genellie, being first duly sworn, deposed and says: I am a united states citizen, over 21 years of age, and the city Clerk of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota. On May 25, 1994, acting on behalf of the said city, I deposited in the united States Post Office at the city of Hopkins, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of hearing on proposed assessments, Oakridge South Streets, Project 93-17, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing list. There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. e Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25th day of May, 1994. ~NO~~ e JAMES T. GESSElE I """ NOT....RY PUBLIC _ MINN~50T" '1,'; HENNEPIN COUNTY ".; ".." My commission expires 3-19-95 ~~~~J/~~ ~~~~~~~ e Per Unit Assessments Project 93-17 Oakridge South Streets 8117-22 33 0003 24-117-22 22 0007 24-117-22 22 0012 CITY OF HOPKINS GOODMAN REAL ESTATE PILGRAM PROPERTIES 1010 S 1ST ST C/O SAGE CO C/O EL SAG-ROB INWOOD LA CO HOPKINS, MN 55343 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD MINNETONKA, MN 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 24-117-22 22 0013 24-117-22 22 0014 24-11.7-22 22 0015 GOODMAN REAL ESTATE GOODMAN REAL ESTATE GOODMAN REAL ESTATE C/O SAGE co C/O SAGE CO C/O SAGE CO 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD MINNETONKA, MN 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 24-117-22 22 0016 24-117-22 22 0017 24-117-22 22 0069 GOODMAN REAL ESTATE GOODMAN REAL ESTATE HOPKINS HOUSE HOTEL CORP C/O SAGE co C/O SAGE CO C/O DAVID HAYES 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD 1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD 3749 TOWNDALE DR MINNETONKA, MN- 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55305 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 24-117-22 22 0070 24-117-22 21 0031 24-117-22 22 0067 HERBERT MASON IND SCHOOL DIST 270 EQUITIES UNLIMITED 1589 STATE HWY 7 #203 1001 STATE HWY 7 6268 E HWY 101 HOPKINS, MN 55305 HOPKINS, MN 55305 SHAKOPEE, MN 55379 11I117-22 22 0004 13-117-22 31 0002 24-117-22 22 0011 H KINS HOUSE HOTEL CORP OAK RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB HOPKINS HOUSE HOTEL CORP C/o DAVID HAYES 700 OAKRIDGE RD C/O DAVID D HAYES 3749 TOWNDALE DR HOPKINS, MN 55305 3749 TOWNDALE DR BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 . ----- -- -- --- -- -- -.--- Per Front Foot Assessments Project 93-17 Oakr;dge South Streets .117-22 33 0008 13-1l7-22 33 0009 13-1l7-22 33 OOlO LILA M JOHNSON VIVA 0 ALVIG RICHARD VAN DICK 12209 GOLDEN ACRES DR 725 ROBINWooD LANE 3606 WESTMARK DR MINNETONKA, MN 55305 HOPKINS, MN 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 13-1l7-22 33 0011 l3-117-22 33 0012 l3-117-22 33 0013 ROBERT L HATLESTAD CURTIS A NELSON JAMES F LISKA 15308 WILLWOOD DR 713 ROB INWOOD LANE 3722 SUNRISE DR E MINNETONKA, MN 55345 HOPKINS, MN 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 13-1l7-22 33 0014 13-l17-22 33 0015 13-1l7-22 33 0016 MARIAN S MOSS ALAN W MEULENERS STEVEN M LONGLEY 707 ROB INWOOD LANE 701/703 ROB INWOOD LANE 16275 TEMPLE DR S HOPKINS, MN 55305 HOPKINS, MN 55305 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 13-117-22 33 0017 13-117-22 33 0018 13-1l7-22 33 0019 LUCILLE H SODERHOLM RUSSELL J LONG DOROTHY A SCHULTE 724 ROBINWOOD LANE 720/722 R08INWOOD LANE 706/70S ROBINWOOD LANE HOPKINS, MN 55305 HOPKINS, MN 55305 HOPKINS, MN 55305 13-117-22 33 0020 aE A KRUGER 702/704 ROBINWOOD LANE HOPKINS, MN 55305 e -- ,. COST BREAKDOWN - LOWBID BY DRIVEWAY DESIGN, INC. OAKRIDGE SOUTH 1994" STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION HOPKINS, MN BMl PROJECT NO. TC94.0023 e ITE TOTAL LOWBIO SECTION A : NO. ITEM CONTRACT UNIT UNIT AMOUNT STRE:~ QUANT. PRICE QUANT.. AMOUNT 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LUMP SUM $7,500.00 $7,500.00 0.62 $4,650,00. 2 CLEARING &. GRUBBING 1 LUMP SUM $1,975.00 $1,975,00 1 $1,975.00 3 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB &. GUTTER 278 L1N FT $2.00 $556.00 120 $240,00 4 REMOVE &. REINSTALL FENCE 290 L1N FT $8.00 $2,320.00 290 $2,320,00 5 REMOVE CONC WALK &. DRIVEWAY PAIfT 1074 SO FT $0.70 $751.80 538 $376.60 I 6 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN 8 EACH $105.00 $840.00 7 SALVAGE CASYING 25 EACH $52.50 $1,312.50 8 SALVAGE HYDRANT 3 EACH $262.50 $767.~0 9 SALVAGE GATE VALVE &. BOX 1 EACH $105.00 $105.00 10 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) 5460 CUYD $4.25 $23,205.00 5435 $23.096.75 11 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (1) 60 CU YO $12.00 $720.00 60 $720.00 12 GRANULAR BACKFILL (LV)(l) 60 CU YD $10.00 $600.00 60 $600.00 13 TOPSOIL BORROW (L V) (1) 30 CUYD $10.00 $300,00 30 $300.00 14 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (1) 30 TON $10.50 $315.00 30 $315.00 15 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION (1) 3 EACH $262.50 $78U,0 16 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 6310 TON $7.15 $45,116.50 6053 $43,278.95 , 17 1-1/2" TYPE 41 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 14200 SOYD $1.90 $26,980.00 13678 $25,968.20 ' 18 '~1/2" TYPE 31 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 6800 SOYD $2.00 $13,600.00 6278 $12,556.00 19 2-1/2" TYPE 31 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE 7500 SOYD $3,00 $22,500.00 7500 $22,500.00 20 3" TYPE 31 BASE COURSE MIXTURE 4300 SOYD $3.50 $15,050.00 4300 $15,050,00 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 1000 GALLON $1.50 $1,500.00 971 $1,456,50 22 12" R.C, PIPE SEWE:R CL IV 506 L1N FT $19,95 $10,094.70 23 15" R.C. PIPE SEWER CL IV 335 L1N FT $22. 05 $7,386.75 24 16" R.C. PIPE SEWER CL III 1070 UN FT $27.30 $29,211.00 25 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES H 33.9 UN FT $78.75 $2,669.63 26 CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES C OR G 21.8 L1N FT $76.75 $1,716.75 27 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES A OR F 68.1 UN FT $78,75 $5,362.88 26 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM SEWER) 27 EACH $185.00 $4,995.00 29 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING 1 EACH $158,00 $156.00 1 $156.00 30 ADJUST VALVE BOX 6 EACH $132.00 $792.00 6 $792.00 31 4" CONCRETE WALK 2000 sa FT $1.90 $3,800.00 1335 $2,536.50 32 4" CONCRETE WALK (EXPOSED AGGREGATE) 1250 sa FT $3.40 $4,250.00 1250 $4,250,00 33 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE STEPS 170 sa FT $14,70 $2,499.00 170 $2,499.00 . 34 PRECAST CONC BLOCK RETAINING WALL 300 sa Ff $12.25 $3,675.00 300 $3,675.00 35 CONCRETE CURB &. GUTTER DESIGN B618 7969 UN FT $5.55 $44,227.95 7760 $43,068.00 36 7" CONCRETE PAVEMENT (HIGH EARLY STRENGTH) 162 SOYD $28.35 $4,592.70 162 $4,592.70 37 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 lUMP SUM $7,500.00 $7,500.00 0.62 $4,650.00 38 RUBRUM MAPLE - 3" CAl B&B (1) 1 EACH $265.00 $265.00 1 $265.00 39 SUGAR MAPLE - 3" CAL B&.B (1) 2 EACH $265.00 $530.00 2 $530.00 40 SUGAR MAPLE ~ l-1f;>" CAL B&.B (1) 4 EACH $156,00 $632.00 4 $632.00 41 SUMMIT ASH - 1-1/2" CAL B&B (1) 9 EACH $156.00 $1,422.00 9 $1,422.00 42 AMUR MAPLE(SHRUB TYPE) 3' HT CONT (1) 6 EACH $30.00 $180.00 6 $180.00 43 HONEYSUCKLE (DWARF TYPE) 18" HT CONT (1) 6 EACH $30.00 $180.00 6 $180.00 44 ARCADIA JUNIPER 18" SPR CONT (1) 9 EACH $42.00 $376.00 9 $378.00 45 TAlE GRATE AND FRAME (WI ROOT GUARD) (1) 8 EACH $310.00 $2,480.00 8 $2,480.00 46 LANDSCAPE ROCK (1.5" GRAVEL) -4" DEPTH (1) 84 SOYD $10.50 $682.00 84 $862.00 47 LANDSCAPE FABRIC (1) 132 SOYD $1.30 $171.60 132 $171.60 46 SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (1) 48 SOYD $10,50 $504.00 48 $504.00 49 BLACK POLY EDGER - 5" (1) 320 llN FT $1.10 $352.00 320 $352.00 50 SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED MOD 290 UN FT $3.50 $1,015.00 290 $1,015.00 S1 SODDING TYPE LAWN 4150 SOYD $1.50 $6,225.00 4080 $6,120.00 52 6" WATCRMAIN D.l. CLASS 52 373 llN FT $21.00 $7,833.00 53 FITTINGS 692 POUNDS $1.35 $934.20 54 6" VALVE &. BOX 1 EACH $525.00 $525.00 55 6" x 6" WET TAP &. VALVE 2 EACH $1,575.00 $3,150.00 56 HYDRANT 3 EACH $1,575.00 $4,725.00 57 RELOCATE HYDRANT 1 EACH $788,00 $788.00 56 2" POLYSTYRENE INSULATION (1) 8 SOYD $10.50 $84.00 59 1" TYPE K COPPER PIPE (1) 100 UN FT $12.60 $1,260,00 60 1,5" TYPE K COPPER PIPE (1) 100 llN FT $15.75 $1,575.00 61 1" CORP STOP (1) 3 EACH $52.50 $157.50 62 1.5" CORP STOP (1) 3 EACH $63.00 $189,00 I 63 1" CURB STOP &. BOX (1) 3 EACH $158.00 $474.00 64 1.5" CURB STOP &. BOX (1) 3 EACH $185,00 $555.00 65 CONNECTTO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE 1 EACH $895.00 $895.00 66 CONSTRUCT SANITARY MANHOLE 34.7 UN FT $89.25 $3,096.98 67 CASTING ASSEMBLY A-7 MOD (SAN SWR) 13 EACH $168.00 $2,184.00 66 8" PIPE SEWER PVC SDR 35 507 UN FT $23.10 $11,711.70 69 12" PIPE SEWER PVC SDR 35 219 UN FT $29.40 $6,438.60 . 70 4" PIPE SEWER SERVICE PVC SDR 35 (1) 100 UN FT $15.75 $1,575.00 71 6" PIPE SEWER SERVICF PVC SDR 35 (1) 100 UN FT $16.80 $1,680.00 72 FURNISH &. INSTALL 8"x4" WYE (1) 3 EACH $63.00 $169.00 73 FURNISH &. INSTALL 8"x6" WYE (1) 3 EACH $68.00 $204.00 74 JACK & AUGER 20" STEEL CASING 150 UN FT $126.00 $16,900,00 OTAL: $384,093.74 $236,757.80, COST BREAKDOWN - LOWBID BY DRIVEWAY DESIGN, INC. 05/16/94 OAKRIDGE SOUTH 1994 STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION HOPKINS, MN (1) NOT SUBJECT TO MNDOT SPEC 1903 BMI PROJECT NO. TC94.0023 . ITEN SECTIONB SECTION C SECTiON D . SECTION E NO. WATERMAIN SA~.SEWER 8TM. SEWER WALK REPAIR CHECK QUANT. . AMOUNT QUANT. AMOUNT QUANT. AMOUNT qUANT, AMOUNT QUANT. AMOUNT 1 0,06 $450.00 0.14 $1,050,00 0.17 $1,275.00 0.01 $75.00 1 $7,500.00 2 1 $1.975.00 3 158 $316.00 278 $556.00 4 290 $2,320.00 5 536 $375.20 1074 $751.80 6 2 $210.00 6 $630.00 6 $840.00 7 12 $630.00 13 $682.50 25 $1,312.50 8 3 $767.50 3 $787.50 9 1 $105,00 1 $105.00 10 25 $106.25 5460 $23,205.00 11 60 $720.00 12 60 $600.00 13 30 $300,00 14 30 $315.00 15 2 $525.00 1 $262.50 3 $787.50 16 207 $1,480.05 50 $357.50 6310 $45,116.50 17 465 $883.50 57 $108.30 14200 $26,980.00 18 465 $930.00 57 $114.00 6800 $13,600.00 19 7500 $22,500.00 20 4300 $15,050.00 21 26 $39.00 3 $4.50 1000 $1.500.00 22 506 $10,094.70 506 $10,094,70 23 335 $7,386.75 335 $7,386.75 24 1070 $29,211.00 1070 $29.211.00 25 33.9 $2,669,63 33.9 $2,669.63 26 21.8 $1,716.75 21.8 $1,716.75 27 68.1 $5,362.88 68.1 $5,362.88 28 27 $4,995,00 27 $4,995.00 29 1 $158,00 30 6 $792.00 31 665 $1,263.50 2000 $3,600.00 32 1250 $4,250.00 33 170 $2,499.00 . 34 300 $3.675.00 35 50 $277.50 159 $862.45 7969 $44,227,95 36 162 $4,592.70 37 0,06 $450.00 0.14 $1,050.00 0.17 $1,275.00 0.01 $75.00 1 $7,500.00 38 1 $265.00 39 2 $530.00 40 4 $63?00 41 9 $1.422.00 42 6 $180.00 43 6 $180.00 44 9 $378.00 45 8 $2,480,00 46 84 $882.00 47 132 $171.60 48 48 $504.00 49 320 $352.00 50 290 $1.015.00 51 20 $30.00 50 $75.00 4150 $6,225.00 52 373 $7,833.00 373 $7,833.00 53 692 $934.20 692 $934.20 54 1 $525,00 1 $525.00 55 2 $3,150.00 2 $3,150.00 56 3 $4,725.00 3 $4,725.00 57 1 $768,00 1 $788.00 56 8 $84.00 6 $84.00 59 100 $1,260,00 100 $1,260.00 60 100 $1,575.00 100 $1.575.00 61 3 $157.50 3 $157.50 62 3 $169,00 3 $189.00 63 3 $474.00 3 $474,00 64 3 $555.00 3 $555.00 65 1 $895.00 1 $895.00 66 34.7 $3,096.96 34.7 $3,096.98 67 13 $2,184.00 13 $2,184.00 68 507 $11,711.70 507 $11,711.70 69 219 $6,436.60 219 $6,438.60 . 70 100 $1,575.00 100 $1,575,00 71 100 $1,680.00 100 $1,660.00 72 3 $189.00 3 $189.00 73 3 $204.00 3 $204.00 74 150 $18,900.00 150 $18,900.00 !fOTAl: $24,567_20 $53,716.83 $65.299.21 $3.752.70 $384.093_74 Project 93-17 . Project Costs Worksheet/Budget Street Reconstruction (70% Residentj30% city) Bid Construction Costs $236,757.80 8% Contingency 18.940.20 Subtotal 255,698.00 19% Engineering 48,502.00 5% Admin.jLegal 12,133.36 Total street Construction 316,333.36 316,333.36 70% Share Assessed 221,433.35 30% city Share 94,900.01 Sidewalk Repair (100% city) Bid Construction Costs $ 3,752.70 8% Contingency 300.30 Subtotal 4,053.00 19% Engineering 770.00 5% Admin.jLegal 202.00 Total Sidewalk Repair 5,025.00 5,025.00 Water Main (100% city) . Bid Construction Costs $ 24,567.20 8% Contingency 1,965.80 Subtotal 26,533.00 19% Engineering 5,041. 00 5% Admin./Legal 1,326.00 Total Water Main 32,900.00 32,900.00 Sanitary Sewer (100% City) Bid Construction Costs $ 53,716.83 8% Contingency 4,297.17 Subtotal 58,014.00 19% Engineering 11,023.00 5% Admin.jLegal 2,900.00 Total Sanitary Sewer 71,937.00 71,937.00 Storm Sewer (100% City) Bid construction Costs $ 65,299.21 8% Contingency 5,223.79 Subtotal 70,523.00 19% Engineering 13,400.00 5% Admin./Legal 3,526.00 Total Storm Sewer 87,449.00 87,449.00 . TOTAL IMPROVEMENT $513,644.36 --- Assessment Roll Project 93-17: Oakridge South Streets . _i!I!II;li~umIlJiillllijij.1IIII'.IIIIIII~ 1 700 Oakridge Road 13-117-2231 0002 400 . 00 $35.00 $14,000.00 2 Address Unassigned 13-117-22 33 0003 262.00 $35.00 $9,170.00 3 731 Robinwood Lane 13-117-22 33 0008 86.84 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 4 725 Robinwood Lane 13-117-22 33 0009 74.39 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 5 723 Robinwood Lane 13-117-22 33 0010 72.25 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 6 719 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0011 79.36 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 7 713 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0012 96.23 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 8 711 Robinwood Lane 13-117-22 33 0013 133.38 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 9 707 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0014 114.68 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 10 703 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0015 73.23 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 11 728 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0016 86.55 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 12 726 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0017 71.34 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 13 720 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0018 114.64 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 .14 708 Robinwood Lane 13-117-22 33 0019 88.55 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 15 702 Robinwood Lane 13-117-2233 0020 145.32 - $3,330.00 $3,330.00 16 1001 State Highway No 7 24-117-2221 0031 709.50 $35.00 $24,832.50 17 Address Unassigned 24-117 - 22 22 0004 277.00 $35.00 $9,695.00 18 1301 State Highway No 7 24-117-22 22 0007 1,662.65 $35.00 $58,192.75 19 Address Unassigned 24-117-22 22 0011 23.00 $35.00 $805.00 20 619 Robinwood Lane 24-117-2222 0012 619.26 $35.00 $21,674.10 21 626 Robinwood Lane 24-117-2222 0013 65.80 $35.00 $2,303.00 22 622 Robinwood Lane 24-117-22 22 0014 65.80 $35.00 $2,303.00 23 Address Unassigned 24-117-22 22 0015 12.40 $35.00 $434.00 24 618 Robinwood Lane 24-117-2222 0016 72.00 $35.00 $2,520.00 25 614 Robinwood Lane 24-117-2222 0017 120.05 $35.00 $4,201.75 26 495 17th A venue North . 24-117-2222 0067 149.99 $35.00 $5,249.65 27 1501 State Highway No 7 24-117 - 22 22 0069 532.36 $35.00 $18,632.60 28 1601 State Highway No 7 24-117-22 22 0070 118.00 $35.00 $4,130.00 . 6326.57 $221,433.35 C:123w\projects\93-17pb4.wkJ 5-17-94 I ~- \'J :., F' l\.J N M \ - ( l"- f" g~ ~ l ~ \~.,...../ , , - ------ : ~ - ~ ) \ . " j . rn ~ :I, ~ [ ~ r-, $':0 ' \ ~ ' , ~ \ C).~ ,~ , I >t-:. ' \ , " I \ ii 1 " .. , , I !l , .. . ~ ~ I , \ " ~ I . \ 1 I _ I ' " . '----'" I 1 , '~ '. I . I . \ " I :-- --~." , i , : \ , , , , , ~. ".....-- 0' . , '\ /,.,1,\11' l-- ' , , -- ..., I I [I ')[[ ~ I I r - r , @ \ , , @ , ~ I 1 " I : , - ~:B ~ - ~ ~ I - fl I ~ ..0 I I " ~ .--.. I . , , @h. _l- I ~ ~ I . ~ ..----'-,. 0' ~ <Q) (~\ .c(~ ,- ~ ~ "" Q) " Zl,. I ~ cd! cr:11t tn.".... ~CE5: ~ ~ l.......'\ .... ~ '~%-- ~ /t::'ol ' 1'1 ~ .... . ~ L' --" 0 i~. \ z ,Z, 0 ~ . '.. i 0: ~ . :H, I,.., '. . 1 '. . ~ ..' 1 . I r;:.>;- ~ I 1 '~~ 1 I .--.. , <0 <D I ~ 1 ~~ I 1 I , I I . 00\ : I 001 , : I t, ~ - ..... ~ ~ .,~ . l '6ll 8/ ~ " 0 qi u . - . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 94-57 ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 93-17 OAKRIDGE SOUTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the reconstruction of streets and installation of utilities on RObinwood Lane, 5th Street North and Elmo Service Road, as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 93-17, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA: 1- Such proposed assessment, as may be amended and a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each . tract of land therein included 1S hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2 . Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum form the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from June 21, 1994 until December 31, 1995. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest from one year on all unpaid installments. 3 . It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. . ---- -- -- - ---- ---- . council Report 94-109 page 2 . Analysis of Issues 0 What is the background on this issue? One of the options identified in the Mainstreet feasibility report is to establish a common center turn lane. Many of the property owners in this area that attended the June 3rd Mainstreet meeting thought that this would be a good idea. There was however, some concern of the effectiveness of this option by one of the property owners. In an attempt to address this concern it was agreed by all the property owners attending the June 3rd meeting that the city should establish a common center turn lane as soon as possible. This would then allow all the property owners to experience this traffic movement prior to the July 5th public hearing. Staff feels that this would be a good method to gauge the effectiveness of this option and is therefore recommending Council pass the recommended motion. 0 What was Now Sports' reaction to the Common Center Turn Lane idea? Now Sports indicated that their only real concern with this idea is that parking be retained in front of their store as much as possible. staff's recommended motion would e implement the common center turn lane and allow parking to be retained as it presently exists on the south side of the street. Staff 1S not recommending parking be retained on the north side of the street during this experiment for two reasons. The first reason is that retaining parking on the north side of the street would limit the effectiveness of the common center turn lane. The second reason is that Now Sports has additional available parking in the rear of their building. 0 What was Burger King's response to moving their entrance? After the last council meeting, staff researched the possibility of moving Burger King's drive - through entrance to the west to reduce the turning movement conflicts with the Hopkins Car Care Center. During this review staff discovered one major problem that would not allow the entrance to be relocated. The problem is with regards to the stacking needed for Burger King, and also for 5th Avenue left turn movements for west bound Mainstreet traffic. If you would move Burger King's drive - through entrance to the west, you would also move their stacking area to the west. This would then reduce the left turn lane area at 5th Avenue, and thereby create traffic congestion for west bound motorists trying to take left hand turns from the through . lane. For this reason staff is not recommending Burger King's drive - through to be relocated. After covering this problem, staff did not pursue this idea with Burger King. = --