CR 94-163 CUP - Hanus Bus Facility
'( y 0
\
V ""
m
~ "
. August 3 1, 1994 o P K \ ~ Council Report 94-163
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - HANUS BUS FACILITY
Proposed Action.
Staff recommends the following motion: Move to approve Resolution 94-69 approving a
conditional use permit for a bus facility.
Mr. Hutchison moved and Mr. Racek moved to approved Resolution RZ94-9 recommending
approval of a bus facility with conditions. The motion passed on a 4-1 vote. Mr. Day voting
nay and Mr. Hutchison abstaining from voting,
Overview,
Fred Hanus, the applicant, is proposing to move his bus facility from Minnetonka to Hopkins.
The site he is proposing to move to is located just west of the Venturian building on County
Road 3. This site is currently vacant.
The Hanus buses at this location will serve the Minnetonka area. Approximately 50-60 buses
will be located on the Hopkins site. The proposal includes the construction of a storage,
office, maintenance building and possibly a bus shed, The buses will be parked at the southern
end of the site,
. The biggest issue with this proposal is the traffic and access issues on County Road 3.
Because of the staff concerns with the traffic and access issues, a traffic study was completed
by Benshoof & Associates, Inc. The traffic study is attached,
Among numerous other conditions, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
CUP subject to a new access point on County Road 3 to be a "right in/right out" only,
Primarv Issues to Consider.
0 What is the zoning of the property?
0 What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject site?
0 What does the zoning ordinance require?
0 What are the specifics of the development?
0 What was the recommendation of the traffic study?
0 What is the staff recommendation?
0 What occurred at the Zoning and Planning meeting?
Supportin2 Documents,
0 Analysis of Issues
0 Traffic Study
0 Resolution 94-69
. 'Thrr~ ~ nnclt \Den
Nancy Anderson, AICP
Planner
- - - -- - - -- -- -- --
CR94-163
Page 2
. Primary Issues to Consider.
0 What is the zoning of the property?
The subject site is zoned I-I, Industrial. A bus facility is permitted with a conditional use
permit
0 What is the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject site?
The Comprehensive Plan has designated the subject site as Industrial.
0 What does the zoning ordinance require?
Section 540.03 states the following: "Trucking or bus terminal provided said site shall have a
landscaped front yard of 40 feet or more when any loading doors face the public right-of-way;
the entire site other than required front yard shall be fenced; an off-street parking space for a
50 foot long, over the road trailer shall be provided for each loading bay; all storage outside of
a building shall be considered an open sales lot and require a conditional use permit for same;
lighting, if provided shall be so located and designed as to concentrate the light to prevent
glare or direct rays of light from being visible from any public roadway or private property;
should an outside public address system be installed, it shall be so designed and used that it
shall not be heard from abutting property; provisions for trash shan be provided and
. screened. "
0 What are the specifics of the development?
Landscaping
The plan shows landscaping surrounding the site. The site is required to have 48 trees. The
landscape plan shows 42 trees. However, 20 of those trees are not the size required by the
Ordinance, Staff is recommending the size is increased to comply with the Ordinance. The
site also has existing trees that will remain. The existing trees count toward the requirements
for number of trees. Staffis recommending that the site is irrigated along County Road 3,
City Engineer
The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and made the following recommendations:
0 locate all stann sewer structures on the site
0 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval needed
0 Regulate storm water runoff
.
CR94-163
Page 3
. Fire Marshal
The site plan indicated that there are two ] 0,000 gallon above ground fuel tanks located on
the west side of the site, The Fire Marshal noted that these tanks will have to be buried as per
the City Code, The site plan indicates that they will be buried,
Parking
The employee parking is located on the north side of the site with the buses parked on the
south side of the site, There are 73 parking spaces for the employees. The Zoning Ordinance
does not have a specific parking requirement for the applicants use. However, based on the
information supplied by the applicant 73 parking spaces should be more than adequate. The
site plan shows a bituminous surface for the employee parking and a gravel surface for the bus
parking area. The staff is recommending that the entire area used for bus parking and
maneuvering is also a bituminous surface.
At a future date the applicant will be requesting a waiver of plat for a small addition of
property from the Hopkins Auto body property.
Trash
The garbage dumpster is proposed to be located behind the storage building, Staff is
. recommending that the dumpster is screened.
Access
The site plan shows a joint access between NAPCa and the bus facility, The access issue will
be discussed later is this report,
Exterior
The office building, which is the northerly most building, will have an exterior of cedar siding
and masonry base, Behind and to the east of this building the applicant is proposing to have
two metal buildings, The applicant will be covering the west and east sides of the metal
buildings with a masonry base and cedar siding. All the sides of the buildings that will be
visible from County Road 3 will have an exterior of cedar siding with a masonry base,
The roof of the storage building wj]J be visible. Staff is recommending that the this roof is an
earthtone color,
Lighting
The lighting plan shows pole lighting in the employee parking area, The site is also lit by
. mounted lighting on the buildings.
- -
CR94-l63
Page 4
. Setbacks
The Zoning Ordinance requires a front yard setback of 75 feet and 20 foot setback on all the
other sides, The site plan shows a 75 foot front yard setback and the buildings aU have a 20
foot setback or greater.
Surrounding Uses
The site is surrounded by the following uses:
0 Central Park to the north
0 Venturian to the east
0 NAPCO to the west
0 Industrial area to the south
0 What was the recommendation of the traffic study?
A traffic study was completed by Benshoof & Associates, Inc. regarding the applicants
operation, The preferred recommendation was that there is a shared access with Hanus and
Hopkins Auto Body located in the Venturi an building to the east.. However if this access is
not possible the access shown on the site plan is acceptable provided there is a left turn lane
for westbound traffic on County Road 3 and the access is designed as per the traffic study,
. Any new access point will have to be approved by the County, Mr, Hanus has discussed the
proposed access point on the site plan with the County. The County has indicated that an
access permit will probably be given.
Staff is recommending that the access on County Road 3 is designed as a joint access with the
property to the east, the Hopkins Auto Body property, The second alternative of a new
intersection on County Road 3, as proposed by the applicant would cause greater accident
potential. Because of the greater chance for accident potential and associated health, safety
and welfare concerns, the staff is recommending that an additional access point not be
permitted and there be a joint access arrangement developed between Hanus and Hopkins
Auto Body or Venturian Corp/NAPCO,
0 What is the staff recommendations?
Staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
o that all storm sewer structures are located on the site.
o that Nine Mile Watershed District approve the proposed project
o that the stormwater runoff is regulated as per staff approval
o that the site is irrigated adjacent to County Road 3
. o that there is no public address system on the site
o that all garbage dumpster and recycling containers are screened
o that the fuel tanks are buried as per the City Code
o that the roof of the storage building is an earthtone color
o that the entire bus parking and maneuvering area is bituminous
CR94-163
Page 5
. o that the MPCA approve all improvements to the site
o that the applicant secure a driveway permit from the County
o based upon the Benshoof & Associates traffic study dated 6/14/94 and due to health
and safety concerns associated with the applicants proposed access arrangement,
that no additional access point be allowed on County Road 3 to service this site.
Instead access to the Hanus site shall be provided through a joint access
arrangement, The City shall be provided a copy of any joint access agreement
between Hanus & the other property owner, Furthermore, the applicant shall
provide revised site plan to the City staff for approval which illustrates the joint
access arrangement and other necessary changes to the site.
0 What occurred at the Zoning and Planning meeting?
The staff briefly described the applicants proposal. Staff noted that the access to the site is the
major issue with the proposed development Mr, Hanus, the applicant and Mr. Orlin, the
applicants attorney appeared before the Commission. Mr, Odin stated that they had been
unable to work out a joint access with Mr, Stiele. There was considerable discussion on the
access Issue. Mr. Day suggested that if there is a new access it is a right-inlright-out only.
There was considerable discussion on this option. The Commission was concerned about the
buses making a left turn on County Road 3, Jon Wertjes from Benshoof and Associates was
at the meeting. Mr, Wertjes stated that the right-in/right-out access would work. The
Commission approved the conditional use permit with one of the conditions being that there
. would be a new access on County Road 3, but this access would only be a right-in/right-out.
Alternatives
}, Approve the conditional use permit to operate a bus facility. By approving the conditional
use permit to operate a bus facility, the applicant will operate a bus facility,
2, Approve the conditional use permit to operate a bus facility with the conditions as
recommended by the staff, By approving the conditional use permit with the conditions a
recommended by the staff, the applicant will be able to operate a bus facility with
conditions.
3, Deny the conditional use permit to operate a bus facility. By denying the conditional use
permit to operate a bus facility, the applicant will not be able to operate the bus facility as
proposed. If this alternative chosen by the City Council, the City Council will have to
state findings of fact which recommend denial of the conditional use permit.
4. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is
needed, the item should be continued.
.
- - -- - - .--- ,- - - .-
COUNTY ROAD 3 LOCATION MAP
! l.-~__ !l20
L ~ ___ G 12 D
1600
/200 F Oil 9 (S)
(9) (6)
A
. I
, I
NAPCO (7)
"'*-.w.".,,> _ .
-
i E (I0) \~\6 ~
~~jlii~i~~11i1~1f~~I!il~~~ !')
fl"j
":::::::::::::::fif.~:::"':':::::':: (2 ) ~O.
.. .,,, , .. ..... ... j I 'fJ'
. . \-..S.
I
...: ! (])
(4) ~. .
i
I
......... ~..........+..... -:..... .....~... ........ ~,... .. ....
-- ~\~ LL
......
~~:~:%~:~~:~~~1~~~:ti:: tl:r::::~):~=m=$:::::;:::::-:"" . I~O /2 ........
......
~::::~~~~f:~::~~=:::~=*:~t t?*~::::::::::::::::::~.... 31 ~
~W'~'
"'-
-
'"
's
iO~ CJ
\\(,~GO --
'J-
\) \) \ (5)
(7) (8) ~ LOT 3
(6) .
I .",
-J
~
....
....
1515 1415 1305-1315
-- 5TH STREET -SO-
- - - - -
z.1/~02..,- f , , 1202, I IlIa 1/06 1/02
1520 /418-22 17 II
I 2 II -..J ' I I
~ --- 2 O}
2 2~/j 02 I 16 ! I I.
-- Zp I a.. 3 1 I I (4) 3 LOT 6
{451 (6) 15 I
6 .3 II
I -n:-- -[, <( I 14 436
210 ,(5), 4 I' !
. ~~\~ . (53) .4 J:;Jl r lLJ I
- J;- 2<ri r 25 I 13 I' 5 I
19 I 26 I 12 I' 6 I
\0 ~ 18(/), I ~ 7 II' II 7
I 'C -! I 1 [ /- -
rffir 8/ 10 I r 2
2 I' -1 ,.
AC:) 16--1 I 9 t.n I I I 9 I /'Oil 3 Gi
lC) ./---< 1----
- I'r) 5 I~ ; (32lu 10 f ,/ 9 ! 454
62: II) ( ,- ---
, (52) '!J; I 3= II I I. - ;(T3af 5
...... I _ ___J l
3 C\( I. . I
~!r) lr) _~~L_!:_! 7 \ ,
7i I
C) -..:. 6TJ
J?; - ---
1
I ~ 1
r..,r.i ,
CITY OF HOPKINS
. Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: 94-69
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
HANUS BUS COMPANY - EAST OF 1600 SECOND STREET SOUTH
WHEREAS, an application for a conditional use permit, CUP94-2,
has been made by Hanus Bus Company; and
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows:
1. That an application for a conditional use permit CUP94-2 was
filed with the city of Hopkins on June 24, 1994.
2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and
published notices, held a public hearing on the application
and reviewed such application on July 26 and August 30,
1994: all persons present were given an opportunity to be
heard.
3. That the written comments and analysis of the city staff
were considered.
. 4. That the report prepared by Benshoof and Associates, dated
6/14/94 was considered.
5. The legal description of the subject property is as follows:
Lot 1 Block 1 Stiele Addition
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for
conditional use permit CUP94-2 is hereby approved based on the
following Findings of Fact:
1. That a bus facility is permitted in an 1-1 district
with a conditional use permit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for CUP94-2 is
hereby approved based on the following conditions:
1. That all storm sewer structures are located on the site with
this information to be provided to the City.
2. That Nine Mile Watershed District approve the proposed
project.
3. That the storm water runoff is regulated as per staff
approval.
. 4. That the site is irrigated along county Road 3.
RESOLUTION NO: RZ94-9
Page 2
5. That there is no public address system on the site.
. 6. That all garbage and recycling dumpsters are screened.
7. That the fuel tanks are buried as per the City Code.
8. That the roof on the storage building is an earthtone color.
9. That the landscaping is increased in size to meet the zoning
requirements.
10. Based upon the Benshoof & Associates traffic study dated
6/14/94 that there is a joint access between the proposed
bus facility and the NAPCO property. This access will be
designed by Benshoof & Associates. Furthermore, when a
median is constructed on County Road 3 the applicant agrees
I to an access of a right-in/right-out at the new access
location and will not request a full access (left and right
turn movements) from Hennepin County.
11. That the applicant shall secure a driveway permit from
Hennepin County for the new access.
12. All other City Code requirements relating to the proposed
use shall be met.
13. That the entire bus parking lot and maneuvering area is
. bituminous. The applicant shall provide a plan acceptable
to the city
14. The the conditional use permit is reviewed by the Planning
Commission every 12 months until a median is constructed on
County Road 3.
15. There will be no left turns entering and exiting for all
vehicles from the new access on County Road 3 between the
NAPCa and the Hanus property.
16. That the MPCA approve all improvements to the site.
17. That the applicant secure from the westerly property owner
an easement to accommodate a deceleration lane based on a
design acceptable to staff.
Adopted this 6th day of September, 1994.
Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor
Attest:
.
James A. Genellie, city Clerk
BENSHOOF & RSSOC. INC. TEL No, 612 832 9564 Sep 01,94 10:28 P.03
-
~ BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS
7301 OHMS LANE. SUIT!: 500 I EDINA, MN 554391 (612) 832-98581 FAX (612) 832~9564
-
September 1~ 1994 REFER TO FILE: 94-14
MEMORANDUM
TO: Nancy Anderson, City of Hopkins
FROM ~ Jon wen~
RE: Conditional Use Permit fOT the Hanus Bus Facility
Based on the City of Hopkins Planning Commission action at the August 30, 1994
meeting, this memorandum outlines the traffic parameters contained in the Conditional
Use Permit Resolution 94-69 for the proposed Hanus Bus Facility.
While this new right in/out only access is not the preferred solution identified in our
. June 14, 1994 memorandum, Benshoof & Associates is in agreement that this right
in/out only driveway access for the Hanus/NAPea properties can function safely with
limited impact to through traffic on County Road 3.
Each of the traffic parameters/items cited in the resolution are discussed as follows:
. Items 10 and 15 - Acces$ to County Road 3 Benshoof & Associates has
reviewed and is in agreement to the right turn in and out only for the proposed
Hanus Bus Facility. Since this right in/out only access is a site plan change
from the June 14, 1994, minor revisions to driveway layout are needed.
a) The driveway layout presented in Figure 3 of the June 141 1994
memorandum needs to be revised. The driveway width should be
reduced from 40 feet to 30 feet for its entire length from the proposed
Hanus building north to County l<.oad 3. This width reduction eliminates
the northbound left turn Jane from the site w Coumy Road 3. I would
suggest that this 30 foot driveway be centered on the properl~ line
between Hanus and NAPea sites. This driveway position s auld be
confirmed with Hanus and NAPeO.
b) The existing County Road 3 is an undivided roadway. For this proposed
right in/out driveway to or:rate with the existing undivided County
Road 3 situation, "No Le t Turn" signs should be installed for
westbound County Road 3 traffic. Also, a "No.Left Tumll sign and a
"Ri~ht Turn Only" sign should be installed for the northbound exiting
. traf Ie from [he Hanus/NAPCO driveway.
BENSHOOF & ASSOC. INC. TEL No. 612 832 9564 Sep 01,94 10:29 P.04
Ms. Nancy Anderson -2~ September 1. 1994
.
c) Based on the proposed plans for improving County Road 3 from Shady
Oak Road east to 11th Avenue. a median will be installed across the
proposed Hanus/NAPeO driveway. This median will provide positive
control needed to prevent the left turn movements to/from this proposed
driveway.
. Item 14 - Review of CUP This condition will allow for the monitoring and
compliance of the no left turn provisions at the Hanus/NAPeO access until the
county Road 3 median is constructed. This item of on-going monitoring and
compliance will assist the above recommended naffic signing to prevent left
turn movements prior to reconstruction of County Road 3.
In addition to the above points, we would suggest that the Management of Hanus Bus
Company and NAPea take the foHowing two steps to ensure compliance with the no
left turn restrictions at the proposed driveway on Count)' Road 3; 1) provide specific
directions to employees regarding proper routes of travel to and from their sites, and 2)
monitor the usage of the driveway and take appropriate disciplinary action against any
employee who violates the no left rum restrictIons.
.
e
W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS
7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500/ EDINA, MN 554391 (612) 832~98581 FAX (612) 832-9564
June 14, 1994 REFER TO FILE: 94-14
MEMORANDUM
TO: Nancy Anderson, Clf of Hopkins
FROM: James A. Bensh~Pand Jon Wertj~
RE: Traffic Study for the Hanus Bus Facility
This memorandum documents the traffic study for the proposed Hanus bus facility
located along County Road 3 in the City of Hopkins. The key traffic issues addressed
were:
. How would the bus facility gain access to/from County Road 31
. Can County Road 3 accommodate traffic to and from the bus facility without
. incurring any significant adverse effects?
To effectively address these key issues, the following work tasks were completed:
1) Obtained background information regarding existing roadway and traffic
characteristics, including roadway as-builts, traffic volumes, and observations
regarding existing operations on this segment of County Road 3. This task also
included meetings with City and County staffs to discuss the access issues.
2) Developed traffic forecasts for the proposed bus facility and the adjacent Napco
and Hopkins Auto Body properties.
3) Analyzed the driveway access detailed in the site plan received April 6 and the
ability of County Road 3 to accommodate the projected development traffic
volumes. These analyses accounted for expected traffic increases on County
Road 3 and the planned future upgrading of this roadway. Preliminary results
were discussed with City staff and the applicant.
4) Prepared this memorandum which documents the traffic analyses and
recommendations.
Based on the above tasks, this document presents the traffic study work efforts and
resultant conclusions.
.
Ms. Nancy Anderson -2- June 14, 1994
BACKGROUND INFORl\1A TION .
The existing conditions and the preliminary plans for upgrading this roadway segment
were obtained from work presently being completed for the County Road 3 Corridor
Study. Existing traffic volumes were collected along County Road 3 at the two existing
driveways to the Napco/Venturian properties. The traffic counts were collected from
2:00 to 5:30 p.m. on April 28, 1994.
The site plan for the development proposed by the Hanus Bus Company is presented in
Figure 1. The proposed bus facility will be able to accommodate 54 buses with future
spaces for 10 additional buses. There are 78 employee parking spaces located just
south of County Road 3.
The existing conditions of the Napco facilities were obtained from Gary Rappaport.
Napea presently has 80 employees, 50 people in the office complex and 30 people in
the warehouse. Mr. Rappaport indicated that Hopkins Auto Body will initially use one-
half of the office complex building and Napco office will remain in the remaining half,
or approximately 15,000 sq. f1. for each use. Hopkins Auto Body does have the
opportunity to use the entire office building, and if that occurs Mr. Rappaport has
indicated that Napco offices would move to the warehouse. Also, Gary Rappaport
indicated that Napco is a low intensity user and traffic generator of their buildings. If
use of the Napea buildings would change in the future, higher traffic generation could
rcsul t.
TRAFFIC FORECASTS
The traffic forecasts were developed based on the following three steps: .
1) Established existing traffic volumes
2) Accounted for planned Hopkins Auto Body and Napea land uses
3) Added the Hanus site traffic
4) Added steps 1,2 and 3 to determine the post development traffic volumes
For the Hopkins Auto Body use, trip generation rates were based on expected traffic
generation for similar auto repair uses. The estimated p.m. peak hour trip generation is
54 inbound and 53 outbound trips. If repair uses were to occupy the entire Napea
office building, the estimated p,m. peak hour trip generation would be 110 inbound and
108 outbound trips. All auto repair land use trips were assigned 50 percent each to the
east and west directions on County Road 3.
For the Napca uses, the two trip generation scenarios are: 1) existing driveway
volumes using the appropriate driveways, and 2) future potential of a more intense use
of the Napco warehouse building, Under the more intense use scenario, it is expected
that the 123,400 sq. [1. warehouse could be used at a ten percent office and 90 percent
warehouse use. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation 1,
this intensified use would result in estimated trip generation of 206 p.l11. peak hour
trips, 58 inbound and 148 outbound.
1 Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 5th Edition, 1991. .
--
, ~
.-'~-I :(iri;rITfmli'j IITrT-rrrUp,! I 11Ifli 11l~lil ,_J jj;'~: ':~,!~;'"2.\'_'-; I L"_ --
,; \ l! 1I11111111J 111111] I! 11111 I! 111111! I! I1II : I t,-':r~-' If! i 11111: :,: II (' I! 111111
. - , 1 I .. C L _ I l I - . . . L. .. . I ~~. I -' I I ' I
:/' , . ;,', -1'~ - -' i
. , . J '..', . I-
I - "
:I ' I':'.. ,.: T__, ~,'''I I
I '" - -'
'I : H- ,I ':1 ,,-, -
I : "1-, ILi I I
I' 'I '" I I '
i '-" ...'0", -: ~ ,J
I ':' ,,;11 J I J I 1,1), I II , ;
,I r';' ',-r 1 ,,! - II!! !1:lIII11 .:
:1 ' ""["'''1':1' I !""II III:.
'I I [" 1 I :
~ 'I I I ['... m I : 1 JIH!il!i /1 i
II I , i II :,: II~ ~j,I,!,I,I,I.l! : : I! ! II1I i
\ ' ' ~ IIllil ill I! I" 'II! II !It":: cu..
, -... . '\
c - V~J
L_ f
, :11 "...' f - \J
'I ,1.1 i'.-- I ',;
i ,ll ~ .~
" ,II ,," "'- J'
tl"t.,j'///rJr \ L [--'i
,,"IIIiIiI,ldrl,ltt ' ,}
./'1' I 1'1 " "'~, iii'" I' ~
'11111 'I II I/li 11/ \ 1.111~/II!11 .~, Jd
. ! J I ....1 'r \"l I I ,I 'r () i If ,I I ' ...,. .-\.:~
il ! l'Ij:"II/"JlLJ/ \ I ':I:lftdI/} ; ,_0",l);"..)
II II ('iN"'H' :'1'11 ',' ," ." ,,- '-'-
f ~1tr~.t'flllVfl1illllll') ~--!~'~:_;~....
:1 \Ne17/t1U"'1 .--ijP< ~-'-
", I ill I' .--~ ,~J .~
'j II, ",;,,--
I J ,~".... _.L
I I_I
i1 ' ' -
'I
I
I I-
. ;
- J
I
N
t
SCALE
1-_1 1
~ PLAN SOURCE: WIRTANEN CLARK LARSEN ARCHITECTS, APRIL 10, 1994 0 200' ~
,
CITY OF HOPKINS HANUS BUS FIGURE 1
TRAFFIC STUDY SITE PLAN PROPOSED
. m BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. BY HANUS BUS COMPANY
V TRANSPQRTA nOli E fiG INEERS AND Pl ~ III1ERS
-.- --
Ms. Nancy Anderson -4- June 14, 1994
Fred Hanus indicated that the trip generation characteristics for the bus facility are as .
listed in Table 1. Mr. Hanus said that most bus trips would be oriented to/from the
west on County Road 3.
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION FOR THE HANUS BUS FACILITY
Time Period Bus Trips Employee Trips Totals
6:00-6: 15 am --- 25 in 25
6: 15-6:30 am 20 out 20in 40
6:30-7:00 am 25 au t _n 25
9: 15-9:45 am 35 in 35 out 70
11 : 00 am 10 out 10 in 20
2: 00 pm --- 35 in 35
2:00-2:30 pm 35 out --- 35
2 :45-3 :00 pm --- IS in 15
3:00-3:30 pm 35 out --- 35
4: 15-4:45 pm 40in 40 out 80
6:00-7:00 pm --- 10 out 10
The evening peak hour, 4:30-5:30 p.m., was used for the traffic forecasts because it is
the peak time for traffic on County Road 3, peak activity time for Napea and Hopkins
Auto Body, and a high use period for the Hanus facility. Table 2 identifies the
expected trip generation for the planned and the potentIal land uses. The potential land .
uses include the proposed Hanus bus facility, auto body and repair uses occupying the
entire existing Napco office building, and the more intense use of the Napeo warehouse
building. To be in a conservative posture, the traffic analysis has been based on the
higher trip generation associated with the potential land use scenario. Based on the
above traffic forecast data, the projected traffic forecasts are presented in Figure 2 for
the access plan proposed by the Hanus Bus Company in which the Hanus and Napea
developments would share a new full access driveway on County Road 3.
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON FOR PLANNED
AND POTENTIAL LAND USES
Total P.M. Peak Hour Trips
Initial
Planned Potential
Land Use Uses Uses
Hanus Bus Site 80 80
Napea Sites 80 206
Auto Body Site 107 218
TOTAL 267 504 .
r '"'
.
~ 967/1 063 ~ 992/1033 ~981/1002
CSAH 3 r 25/23 r N.A.l23 r 5/55
715/816 ~ 1r 773/836 ~ 1r 773/842~ lr
3/22 ~ N.A.l46 ~ 0/55~
C\I<D ('I')r- -.::t-.::t
~<.O lO<O LOll)
--
mro -- r-LO
1O ~~ ..- r-
zz
NAPeOI HANUSI HOPKINS
TECH CENTER NAPea AUTO
BODY
. I EXISTING 1994 COUNTS
N
t XX/XX - PROJECTED POST-DEVELOPMENT
VOLUMES WITH APPROX. 30,000 SQ. FT.
AUTO USES, HIGHER INTENSITY USE OF
NAPCO WAREHOUSE, AND HANUS
BUS FACILITY
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE: PROJECTIONS ARE FOR ACCESS PLAN PROPOSED BY THE
HANUS BUS COMPANY IN WHICH THE HANUS AND NAPca
DEVELOPMENTS WOULD SHARE A NEW FULL ACCESS
DRIVEWAY ON COUNTY ROAD 3.
~ ~
FIGURE 2
CITY OF HOPKINS HANUS BUS
. TRAFFIC STUDY EXISTING AND PROJECTED
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. VOLUMES
TRAN SPORTA T ION ENGINEERS AND PLAN HE RS
..
Ms. Nancy Anderson -6 June ]4, ]994
In addition, future traffic growth on County Road 3 was established based on Hennepin .
County's 2010 Traffic Forecasts2, Future traffic growth on this County Road 3
segment is expected to be 1.] percent compounded annually. This annual increase
equates to approximately a 20 percent overall growth from 1994 to 2010. Applying the
20 percent growth to the existing County Road 3 p.m. peak hour through volumes
results in an additional 150 eastbound and 190 westbound through trips (two to four
additional vehicles per minute per direction) during the year 2010 p. m. peak hour.
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The traffic analysis focuses on two basic types of traffic questions - the first addressing
the specific plan proposed by the Hanus Bus Company and the second addressing basic
access provisions along County Road 3.
TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS OF HANUS PLAN
The principal purposes of this section are: 1) to determine the specific traffic effects
that would occur if a new full access driveway were constructed on County Road 3 to
provide shared access for the Napco and Hanus sites and 2) if any difficulties are
identified through the preceding step, to determine possible mitigating measures,
Using the traffic forecasts presented jn Figure 2, capacity analyses were conducted for
the driveway access intersections serving the Hanus, Napco, and Auto Body sites. The
analyses indicated that levels of service would be D or better for the post development .
p.m. peak hour conditions at the two existing driveways and the new driveway
proposed by Hanus. Gaps in the traffic flow along County Road 3 would be created by
the traffic signals at 1 1 th and 17th A venues allowing traffic to exit from the Napeo,
Hanus, and Auto Body sites.
A preliminary result from the Coullty Road 3 Corridor Study, which is nearing
completion, is that this portion of County Road 3 should be upgraded to provide a
raised center median and a left turn lane. In the context of this plan, a left turn lane
could be created to serve the new full access driveway included in the Hanus plans.
However, such a left turn lane would reduce the opportunity for landscaping in this
~enter median, which would be contrary to one of the objectives for the County Road 3
Improvements.
The last analysis item regarding the Hanus site plan involves driveway dimensions and
internal circulation. If a new full access driveway is created on County Road 3, the
basic layout should be revised as shown in Figure 3.
'.
2 Hennepin County Traffic Forecasts, Hennepin County, September 1988.
"
COUN1Y ROAD 3
.
, i
I I I I j , I i III , I i ' I I , I I , I \ \ i
i I .i I . ~
I
! ~ . '1
(! { I '-1 I I , I ! r I I ' , ,
1 I
III : ; H'
I i i I I
! I I \ I : I
J I I !
t J.
i i " J
1J I !
NAPea WAREHOUSE I I , I
I I I I
I I I
, I
I !
I , i
I ' I ' - I'
I " I
, I
I I !
II ' , I I
i I ~
I i
' I
I i ' ;
, , !
I I
. ! I ! .
I
I
I I
I
I I
! I I ,
! 1
I I
I
HANUS BUILDING
i
N J
t I i
I ' , I i
I I
i
,
I I ,
SCALE I , , I
, , I
I
0 60'
FIGURE 3
CITY OF HOPKINS HANUS BUS SUGGESTED REVISIONS
. TRAFFIC STUDY TO DRIVEWAY LAYOUT IF
NEW FULL ACCESS
W' BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. DRIVEWAY IS CREATED
TRANSPORT AIION E NG INHRS ANO PLANNERS ON COUNTY ROAD 3
.'
,Ms. Nancy Anderson -8- June 14, 1994
ACCESS PROVISIONS ALONG COUNTY ROAD 3, INCLUDING HANUS SITE .
The purpose of this section is to address basic access provisions along County Road 3,
including whether it would be desirable to create a new full access driveway to serve
the Hanus site. In addressing this point, it is important to recognize that County Road
3 is a minor arterial. The Metropolitan Council's Transportation Development Guide
Chapter/Policy Plan3 presents the following statement regarding mobility versus land
access for urban minor arterials:
"Emphasis Oil mobifity rather than on land access. Direct land
access within the MUSA restricted to concentrations of
commercial/industrial land uses. "
Figure 4 illustrates the roles of various categories of roadways, including minor
arterials, regarding mobility versus land access. It is important to limit access to minor
arterials to maintain their ability to serve inter-regional trips and to provide adequate
safety,
Applying this transportation planning principle to County Road 3, it is our
understanding that Hennepin County has not established specific access spacing
standards. Dakota and Scott Counties have established specific standards for minor
arterials such as COUTlty Road 3 that allow for full access at one-quarter mile (1320')
spacing and limited right turn only access at one-eighth mile (660') spacing.
Existing access spacing conditions on County Road 3 from 11th to 17th A venues are
shown in Figure 5, together with the changes in spacing that would result from the plan .
proposed by the Hanus Bus Company. Major findings regarding access along County
Road 3 between II th and 17th A venues that have been established from this figure and
olher pertinent considerations include:
. The existing condition involves three full access locations and one right turn
only driveway. The average spacing between the full access locations is 500
feet.
. Under the Hanus plan one additional full access driveway would be created,
with the resultant average spacing between full access locations being reduced to
400 feet.
. The spacing between full access locations along this segment of County Road 3
is less than desired, both under existing conditions and with the proposed Hanus
plan, One frame of reference for making this comment is the 1320 foot spacing
standard established by Dakota and Scott Counties. Another frame of reference
is that the average spacing between full access locations along County Road 3
between 11th Avenue and the west ramp intersection with T.H. 169 IS 1000
feet.
. One feature that mitigates the negative effects of more frequent access along the
subject segment of County Road 3 is thal, with the exception of the Public
Works access, all driveways are jusl on the south side of County Road 3,
3 Transportation Development Guide Chapler/Policy Plan, Metropolitan Council, .
October 28, 1993.
..
. i
~
:J PRINCIPAL ARTERIALS
a:J
0
:::i:
c.9
Z
Uj
<(
UJ
II
0
~
MINOR ARTERIALS
COLLECTORS
(f)
(f)
w
0
0
. <(
0
z
:5
CJ
z
[JJ
;ti
0:
0
~
1 LOCAL STREETS
LEGEND
I I MOBILITY FUNCTION
hU;:::~'A LAND ACCESS FUNCTION
CITY OF HOPKINS FIGURE 4
. HANUS BUS
TRAFFIC STUDY MOBILITY VERSUS
W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCESS GUIDELINES
TRANSPORTATlOIl~ NG INEERS AND PLANN ER S
r ""
EXISTING ACCESS SPACING
.
17TH PUBLIC 11TH
AVE WORKS AVE
CSAH 3 340'
700' 370' 380' 210'
NAPCOI NAPCa COUNTRY HOLIDAY
TECH CENTER KITCH EN (RIGHT IN
AND OUT
ONLY)
ACCESS SPACING WITH HANUS PLAN
17TH PUBLIC 11TH .
AVE WORKS AVE
CSAH 3 340'
480' 220' 370' 380' 210'
N NAPCO! NAP CO! AUTO COUNTRY HOLIDAY
t TECH CENTER HANUS BODY KITCHEN (RIGHT IN
AND OUT
ONL Y)
NOT TO SCALE
\... ~
FIGURE 5
CITY OF HOPKINS HANUS BUS
TRAFFIC STU DY COUNTY ROAD 3 .
ACCESS BETWEEN
W BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. 11TH AND 17TH AVENUES
TRA~SPORT~ TION ENG INEERS AND PLANN ERS
.
Ms. Nancy Anderson -11- June 14, 1994
. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the items presented in this report, the preferred traffic solution is to meet the
access needs for the Hanus development without creating additional access on County
Road 3. Two specific options would be: I) to utilize the existing driveway for
Hopkins Auto Body to also provide access for the Hanus development or 2) to relocate
the existing Hopkins Auto Body driveway slightly to the west in a manner that it would
serve both the Hanus and Auto Body sites. Further work is needed to develop an
access layout that would effectively serve both properties, An advantage of this shared
access arrangement is that it would enhance the potential for traffic signal control.
Specifically, the projected post-development volumes for this shared access scenario
would meet the peak hour warrants to install traffic signal control. Signal control
would be especially beneficial for buses making left turns onto County Road 3.
The plan proposed by the Hanus Bus Company to create a new full access intersection
on County Road 3 is less desirable than the preferred solution because it would cause
greater accident potential. If full access is approved, the following two actions should
be taken as minimum mitigation measures - 1) construct a left turn lane for westbound
traffic the full distance between the Hanus and Hopkins Auto Body sites and 2)
construct the Hanus driveway in accordance with Figure 3.
.
.
'-_.__._'~-"-'-_h_.'___,,_.._._
~..-.
HENN, COUNTY
ROAD 3
EXISTING
BU1LDING N.Z.C.
: I I
! J
i i
i i
I. i
;1._ i
I -----------,-j
'" ".,.
i
i ~
I i
i '
__.-..-.._.._..H
I~
: _.._..- fU1\lf\C 13
,_.._..-..-..-..-..-.--..-.'..l..-..-..-..-..
15TH: PLAN
StAtE. f"
- 50.-0'
\> ;,
!:: DID
" ;. -
)lI.SCM'IT USE ;.
Pl(HTEO fOOD FRI.IoI€
C.lSElEflT IllNOOIl TYP,
I1ORU. CED.&.A SIDt~
fiNISH II/STAIN >>C SEALER
)0'-0' ,'-i!" P.I(Htal IETjt,. CUI FLI.SHII<<i
~ (FRONT) NORTH ELEVATION
LVI SCALE. 1/.01" .. 1'-0'
~ OJ
SlOE [Non/ElIT _IlD01...a1loOIl.llll....... I
IIO'-Q'
LWNGf/ClH'EflEtCE t.l1.0STOR.lGE
~ WEST El EVATION
LU SCALE. 1/.(- .. 1'-0'
rn OJ 0
I~I~"~' I ' "
I 1110'-0'
"""
~ EAST ELEVATION
LVI SCALE. 1/"- .. 1'-0'
(~"1
. I }/' 'J~
t211 IOUYl
fill tINS
E:lCISTING BUILDING H
.I.e.
.....
....
i
i
i
i
i
i
. i
j i
i i
f i
i i
fi._. i
i ---'-.---.-._1
J
:
i
i
i
i
~-~
i
i
i
i
i
f
)..-,
,
I .----- . _ . ' ""
i _.._..-..-..-..- f\J1\JI\
.-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..........-..
ExISTING aUIlOING N
, Le.
i
I
i
i
i
i
. i
i i '---
f i
i i
i. i
il.___ i
! .-.-----.-,_.1
!
121 tOQQ 1Il'. H,P.!.
""-
i 1\1~t\..
i fI.l1\J\li'. etv.i'.
i
1 lIGHTING AND
SCAI..E. J' .. 50' _~~NOSCAPE" PLAN
--
--.
-"-"-..---
--
-..----.
HENN
, COUNTY
ROAO
EXISTING
BUILOINt;
N.r.c.
!
I
j
j
j
{
i
I
j --------
{ -- I f
j
i ----- j ! <
--- "-- I ~
----.I j It
, C
~
"-,,
i I
: l
i
!
! ----
""- { /-
"
~
I
j I
i
i\
~
i
.... ,,~ .......___~.__.J.-,-_..._.__._._._.-- .-.-,--.-.,..-.--,..- .
j CIRCU
SCAl.E LA TICW
. J".. PLA.N
50'-0'
901. I J, ,
'" x~-'_!J t".- __.----dO c;:.~~-_-. ~ ..t:XIST1Ncr12~
~ ~. -::--- /' ''-'= ~-,,-"---_.- ) --RO-.
(~) J CO. _ ._-=- c' =-~o"
'" - - -, - -.:(- --,=--":::- - ~ ,.jII(~~'!l
- ,~-~-~-- - - - · ...".. "'I' I!_'" -0, "f7-~, 0 ,_
II ........' *J..,~. 'I!t!l~_ , ~ " . ""'~"a><-. , 'c.-I
.. " CJ ~ ~ ~ , _ 0 . B 1 ( STORMSEWER '\ : I
. ., ,- -.--" I " ) fl
1/ Ci;Q c"'~ '? ). I .?, / T~O~~""-:";","'7' ,/.'.".~ "". ~.
~T7:'-' . / '//"/: "% //"" Uu, ". '/
~~'.._~.'~t- (:;~;.Yf.~~~i~~.~/%!.~~~Y~&~l[~tj" ;;,
i!'ii i!'iii!'ii ~~~ 'ic 0;i'. ?'/.,,, W? "~".0-0% '~P/ '/.~:",. ,_, , ,
~ ~ ~,~ I "J;, ~" ',''''W0W/-riW''"<<;,,:~ .c._ "-f .
.I~')~ CB~' :~tr.~ffikl~~;;.cE&i
~~~ ~~'~ ST Mil III \. ~/~.% ~</(40/';-::~'/ .~?h~ '//:/ //"'::'~W~~%?~/'1 :\:~; ,
~ ~ 'Z2:: '///r,... /, "I' ...,'///// /" ,'" /.. ~
~' , ',,",' 'Ii , ,':%{ "'Y//%", ;, '" ". //.., '. ':'C/"",_ .':'/~ "
~~: \_~~~ ;~~~~~~m' "~ '~~~~~#j@:}: ::~~} 0,
~ -.'@: ,;&, "'0'= 0:'".i~"" _ ,
" ",' ~" '%/,. ji//.;' ""/;'-/'~0:"
~"\,' ~ST MH 112 % 0,,' ;(ffi.~'//~Qr~ /./. '~:~/UL,~.ua,u'/'" /.:., t_.) \
~'" ~ ~'\.'-:'L 'f/"UL/. _L "II ~;/~J ' c::::=.~ _ \
""~" ~,~'" w ~., ~ ,
::~"'~'~~~"'\~; .' ) ;;::;i'~i%~~/~~~>:;:;';:r;:
, S T MH 113 ' '''''?'~'// 0"#/-/.../ r ./.
,~ ;//,u//: 0/'/." /"///", / '.
~~I~.. I. / ~~~~~~""~YI~~
.r"."'''::i:i CB'3 . (~(~ (....
~BT MH.. " ._ .w"..
~ ~~ "I x f. .. .. t X.", ,~;,~:;~~:f; / )-
.~.~" , X.", (/
, ~ ~~ ~ I r _ \~ ~
",. '-. ')
~, " "-
~ ',,- BT caMH .. ~.. 1"
~...~"~ --7 -- I/O~S~8UI~~ '...O"j.\~~\
~ ~ ST C3MH n ""'"", ~ __~::::;/
~ STCBMH'B ;9k'r~ ~
q x,,,, ~~/'i
~~~.~'1 /; . """,.~ _~~/ ~--;:~_______ 0
~~.~ 1 (1- ...-, ....-,-'._10131..---:: -
. ~, ~ ",,'" ~/,,- ,,\ "'/ ,,'~
~" ~ ~~~.".~~~\.;~~---~)----
. ....., -"~ .-~ --- ~\-
~,\" .,.... .- \ ~ ~ o". ,
~ -~'/~1f.~~jfA~\ ~
.....~,~ ~. !~,.55C\~////M
~--/ ,91;'.7 ~~
!
I SCHOELL & MADSON, INC
CERTiFICATION . ~ ENGINEERS' SURVEYORS. PLANNERS ES
,~"'''"' . "~ - - ..""',,, . '"".."."'~ "''''
",_. ~~::;::",". 7.' " " ......"m..~''',..~ ,.
:::..:T;~I=.:l ~ -:.~" l~
....tJ...,~JM-..u.
:
"� .
�
a Ililllll
�
ill II)
�;;� � I
���3 i
� E 7 4
�' , �
. HENN. COUNTV ROA� 3 � � F ` t
.i�6� 3 e e tl
MN' P•]0'
� � . .. ..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�.._.. ..�..�. � �..�..�3.�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..r.�.._.._..� ._�_'_.._'�_'_...�..�"�.'�___..___..�__ — �
._.._..�_._.._.__..__._..�..�.._..�'_�_'_' _.._. -� ._..��.�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�.._..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..
� � �I� ' � I .
� �� � �
� �I � O � I
� �� � � �
� . �a� �( � � � � � .
1
� ]0' II � fMPLOYfE YYYtIK i I
� �� � � �
� � �z�• I
I I E%ISTSNG BU7LUING N.I.C. �
� . ix tt �� . �
I " j
! ti �
a. b• a. b• i i
I E%lSTING BUILDING N.I.C. w � !� ' � I
�
. i II �n � t T-'e � xuolc�V W ! I � �
� � 4IOE�LL[ � I � �
�
i � ��� ! � i
i �y �.� � � i �
! � �� i
i tl � � � � � �
STp1Y'.E w�M.
i I I_ .� � � 9 ! Q
i cMrn. b�iE � � I I_I I I I" I I �' � I I I I�� I I ; � . � n
� /� � 1 � 1 I I I I I I i I I i I--I-I—I I H L�
� I 'q � '�' LShE OF Eii9TlxG IfHZ � � .
� � � � � �
� _.� I mii� vi�nac�iv�u�cnsr. rercE ; �_cacsrnc a<r,c �
• I _.—.—.—'—.—'—.—.—. I M1�VFAfY lftE • •
I I �
GYIB.�fE qM91FA ! � a
� 90�-0' ]0'-0' . m ._�.
i � ��� _� �'.�, � � � �
j �� r.�� I �� �.� ..��� w..� � � i � —`,
� � �
i � n "'� - ! � , �
!��--------------� p � —
s � � O
i � , ��� � , � �
� � e e � ,
I ! :y
� a�: : ' ,s 9 — � �
I � �ts
� �o ; .� � u 4 �f O
� � �
���. a� � W
���� � oo z
,��. � z
� ����
� ��
i �� � Y
- b Qa
- ��
i jPPi� - I' �
� � u .�JPE eIK . Z Y Z Itl �
f ZQNU ���� ,
� smrr�c.an � 1 U Q F' ��¢�' ��,
. ' � Q JI a �
�..e I � � Q 5 �,
r' � A
• ��� //// ^
, 4e�� -
� �oex
......
� , 1 SITE PIAN �
S[�LE. 1' - 50'-0'
r. ���
y • + i �
a I I I I I
� iII I III I
�
.�� .�,w .�o:a ..:.,m .., p : � E F
,... xro�ro � .��.:� rw. ��o,�
� �fPTSQE MET4 ]IOI�6 I�[M Tw ,,..., i
6 e
o p � o�cm ..n.cc aow 6 � � f 4
mw erw.cc wumw xx�w ��� a� i b
���k� �ss�
�■��
4
R
4 � p
7
� ao � �
ehrm cucor . x.sawr e.�s[ ,„ (
v.�xrEO saoo m.�
M�IN EMiN� 00011 C�SEwEM Y[M00� IYP. W'O' b
. XONII. CmY1 f10IM
�i�esn �nr.i� .eo uw.ca eoo srw.ee .uxrcn.�ee
b �� ���� F�INiEO YEIY C�O FLaW�MO
FA NT N RTH VAT N T VA F T RA AN MA NT '
SCAIf: 1/�• - 1•_0• lvl $CALE: 1/�' ' 1'-0'
�
U
� I
. � 4W. 410Iw8 M PO�F . �
tYP. Tla.f �ETlL lfOtK `�' I
t��EO tw p( V�
. • GY6Y£ OUV9tEA I�L I
� � Iu1XT. ACGE55 OOOR . 4
�
� m ❑ �u�
. �uSOMV �vSE f10f diPt/FaIT M�SM�v Y�SE .oimnw mi� �u�w ���. � •
_ � � �.�. �. .
1�
l .E/COKEPE�CE L0.0 STpUGE x�fMTG✓Cf O
W T VAT N �UJ
SCALE: 1/�' - 1'-0' Q
� O
� u'
W
00 �
11 II II L
V L
� �
�SNU6t WOiIK � �
� �w .. x.n.s. uar Y
�000 xus � a
� ____ ___, �h .e � ... , �� �•_—`_ _ 190o Cwuw � O .
�,�«�. m m o m ❑ _-=_=__=��_ _i �;i:� �'�� �� ;ti � %'�_x_#' : ____: Z Q
a ( ,�,.. �...,e,. .... , Q � u W �-� a
,�•<• r-UQ� �
��c ��.�. Q J I a �
� Q 3<
4 A T AT N a 5
.+ sc.�e: �i,• - r-o• 4 T N THROUGH BUS SHED i
• SGLE: 1/�' • 1'-0' ..
�i ♦
�S3x
�
E_.�
�3i 9�
�l 11
r ' ,
, �
a llllllll!
� �1lZllllll
�; � �
���� a
1iENN. CWNTY R�AU 3 E L'' ��$ f � ,
�d��{ � � b �
�---------------•-----------------�--�_..__ � _.._.._.._.._..-°-----._.._._..___.._..----.._.._.._.._.._.._.._---••-•--�- -. -� . _.._.--•--..___.._.._.. a� � . �.._.._.._,._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..�------•--•- ------------•-••--•------------•---- r�
� �, I I ! i
i II � � i
! � � �C� i� � � �"? (?U'�. i i
! I J n . i .
� iI I � IRO[� fRISTIfO lNEE9 I ��
� Plulll E1f�i WI.�EV i
1 ^ FWLOrEE /uKSW
� 1� � �✓ � �
� �w as J j
� � �
ezisz:�w aut�oiMC n.i.c. j
� � `7 � �
! � � L I
� esnrcws vr.vt«o i
I � �-' �j i
� ExISTiNG BUIIPING N.I.C. � � 119 �, � I � i
l � � I � m�c i i i .
I � � �
1 � '�j � j ' �
�„ � l
� � �I � �
{ "° 1 ania � � I B
I cI
• , -- � a.owce waw.. �i , i �
� I I ' J cr*u�r as uu� r.v[+«+ 1 C� � i �.
� _ ! ` �\ti
� cxta e.rt � � l
� � � � , I � �
� I �. ! 1
i � i li�E OF E�IStiW CYIx Llxt FGCE �
I —.t � - . � p' flu� ltwt ifa¢ �/
SINIi9 T➢.I r. � — �
I �.._'�._'�._.._.�.�" 1 � I'1 ��FISSTIKQEFK J/
i plCnEqfY LIfE j L
( /� '
1 ( W�LAElE1Y� • ' �
� � i ` lUEI�� '� LOGME iP/.�El VMYtlx6 lIPfILE _ ' /�%�
; I � i0 g uE�uin�� i .i � �
� �.�'�'_"._'�'_""�I , � � i .
� i ��' � / � �
! i 1 ( ��- ,5 ,i�� r / :>'/ � Q
1 � ���')/ � ��� n �
.a vEn ' �"" ',� ,.'1 �" �' Q I
�� �� � ' NJ rJ �
I ,� � '' � W
� '�� �:,,`-
�� �Z
i t_ Z
i r-, z•' �f �
I ` EKISTiNG �PEES � �
t0 PEwlx —�' — Z
//
� -- o� � LANOSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE ��� Y
� ' sr«ea awicrr —! sia ro*ct � a
� e• s s�. a�rx �ur rexcE �i us u eun ��uf Soqu e�-a' Ke Q
W�FN YIxR STP/VS ITUQ. SOYM PEPIIEfEP pLY �y �) y�py�µy g��y � � f/2' !0 �
p5� 2 OiMt SPIPE CPY 1' w �
E SP�' ,nM w ,ur. ico «stcna wr �
fUj JaE g1K y � w ��rv��soiae. ro �m w 2 Z(� 5 z P
aeoxxcrwY "� var uwx� eocus. aca wawm uo awc ran+ � Q� U °�'� �
� • .,.����. Q�crW �a�e
� aual Q ��
�.� i 3 � �
i ,..•- ••' a 5
• A�
� � / / _
� Q H� Q
�a�x
� .n■■■�■s
�, 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN `"°"� °`�"
� SC�LE. t' � 50'-0' �
"°° 9 LS1
� �� ,
` $ I � I�
� �IIIIIIIII
� ` I
g��E i '
NENN. COl1NTY ROAO 3 � 6 � F e 4
4� F �
_��E� � e b 1
� ------ i - .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. - •--.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. _ � .. .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ ___. . �.._.._.._a• ----------°----°- -----•------ � .
� � � � � t
� �� � �
� � � ,-"--� --- . 0 � I
�� � ` 1 � �
' � �� � 1 1 � � 1
1
j i i i cw�mcc .u«tw � ! j , i
I
� wo •�rT x.v.l. I' ExISTING BUIlOING N.I.C. �
� W�OWIE LifnT _ .
NqMiEO M 3]' I0.E I I -- --
i i � — — _ --- ' 1
.�
� � E%ISTIHG BUILOING N.I.C. 1 , j �( � �
� �I 1 ; I �� j �
I
i �� ;�--- j i� i �
! �`� ; --- '-- -- i j
i � �.��! � I j �
� : �-- • I �
� � I I � i �
. - � i „� w�... f ; ;
' i i .� i � Q '�
' ' — [x�PV G�iE `` ".� _ � � � '�
' �___' � ; �
I � � � 190 IYR M.P.S. LIfM � I
� '�._._._._'� � . � � � WU1IfL IO lLOG. M. � .
� � ji ��-.�___/ ������������I������I������i � � .
, � ----- ---� � � ; - - --- � --f—� �« �7
� i • � i� �r.�„� �',. i (
i � ; ' � i Q
j �«,�....—�Yr ; � _ i n
i I „�� - _ ' ---= - � I�
� � nt� ru.s / � l i� wru ruk:w wr.ce J j' �`� �. ' j ' �
� j � . � , ; � � �,� `�:� � I ' �
� �----•—'-------'—� n � . I /''' ;�. , j � � �
(21 ]000 v. .P.]. �/ b' 40LE � i' il `�" '�� � // � O
� � � � � 1, y`-���_��_�
� i � + � i-- .� � � � � � �
: � � �,,.�--;C � `,, ,� ! � � Q ,
I ; i _ �_�� , U ', , =A_"/ � '^ f
e�s aao . 1�1 f� ��D� 0
i; �,\`� � � ,�_� � �
� � '-��� .. �« .�� ��� .. W
m�s�..:a xi.cc,m
� � � .�_i � .owrrn a [�r[ tw. 00 Z
� ,`�-- �'' `{��/ . . . . Z
i ''�_= - � �
�
; �z
� Y
'� Q 0
� I
� � S etKE tP�i� —
Fu , ZYZN €���
swotn[cimr .
a ��b�H
� . , �uQ_ � �g
i ¢ �z , �
�.� i – � Q 5 �
�' � a A
• � � ' / / / / � � .
� ,�,„ � a � 8
�
1 LIGHTING ANO UNOSCAPE PLAN �
����� g SC/.LE. 1' - 50'-0' . .
�_. LL'I
�
.
A • . �
� $�IIIIIIII
�������I�I
� � �i ` ���
���� F 4
{ 6 4 �' � p
id � �
� , HENN. COUNTY POACI 3 � � `� � � � e a �
.. .._.._.._..___.._.._..r._.. .._..__ •—.�.•—•—••—_—_—.._.._.._.._..—_—_—_r ----.— --_..--•--�_.�—_.._.. �
---•—•--------�-------�._..�_..__._.._. __�.� .._.._.._..—••—••—•.—••—•.�._.�..—••—.._.._..�._.._..�.___.._.._.._.._.. .. �
.. .
i � I� ! i
� ��' ! i
i ��� 0 � !
i �� i i
i �I � �
i j
� a I I �..� ..��� �
� �1� i �
i �� � !
I ExI5T1NG BUILOING N.I.L. �
I �� �
� �� �
1 �� j� �
� � � �i �
I E%ISTING BUILOING N.I.C. , � � ; �
. � „ '�--- � i � . . �
I •' __� i i I
� � I � � �
� I � � '' o.ia ; i t
� I
I � � ! � �
' •— , atm.cc e.t.r. ; I �
� ; I
� I I �— rxmr arc ; �
I J � � �� i �
1 � i �
I � d w � i
� � _'—'_'—'_'_'_'_'_'—'� I C \`.� —_ ! .—`—cxran«c om L � - � I
. � ! � `� �_ ur[ � � �j �.
� -�-_ � j `y
i ommr� a`_as a� %� i
� macie au�� } ��; � �' ; I � .
�u�
� � � vornwoiw 7 wosE au�u�p ukiw sss.a � a� °F f ► I �i'� � .
� i { � 1 { 1 . �c?-� /� e`°`a. ` I ; I / � .
I � � / � o � ' c�' ° � � / �� � � � �
� �--------------� � � �_y—� j%-� j 1 �- ; 1 / � �
� i � j� r ��` ,� v � ; , �•y� p 11
/ /� � �)
I I � ' V ��` ' /(�'' �' � � � ! -'� / f-
1 I � �u� J f � Q
�.� Q _ -�� � N
; �b . � �
; �f� . �� � Z
� , �.F.�«�
i ; %° � L
i j �z
,.,.� � a
�a
. � � .�PI•1� �
E L . . � F p �
e z z ���
� weo�xcrarc '
�..� ' fUS � Q � Q � ���g
..�' Q J I a d
� ¢ ,! g
! 5
�.� ! ' Q p �
I
' _
� � � / / a��
� �aax
� r
CIKJL�RW 0.u�
� 1 CIRLUlATION PLAN � VC 1
SC�.IE: t' - 50'-0' � .
�/f3/
�i 0 NUVI
�
� `
� '
� �_ ;--- R J ��0 �_-. o •-- 907 . I e' i x i' �- � s
y � �\ C Q � 908. B CONNECT 70 EXISTtN6 SAHITARY SEWEq����
�- �— ----"-`-- ---- E�LQS.AYI4H.B�2Q8&l@LESE S'iioS __�-�-7 NOTE: LOCATION OF EXISTING UTIUTIES
��� �ISTiNf�72' RCP SANITA S �--�- AND 5T08M SEWER AqE APPNOXIYATE
i . P ��
1 Y. 907 . 8 FIELD VERIFICATION 1S HEDUIREO
� .�--....._�.-�..�-�'. _'
� � � � � WET TAP CONNECT ON�
EX�STINO WATERIMIN
. I I � . _r.._��'- .. - -' c••- •r�-GKI FIl16 7EHMAIN .
� lil w 1�1 li1 �1 �1 t �1 � � r � � ���l�I R I�! A �cl�i l���17$ �ICIl� - �t�. E i. _--- = _-� �' 9oa:� �c i _
t _. _ . _ o _ _ 7����* _ �a I�i�i �iGl�€ ii � iE �s
1 ' - -- ---- '- •�- � -� 1 o � a %_� =�,:..�.::: • —
Q - o Q _ � � v � E%ISTIN6 06' -• • i }a � . � � O � � . � 1 ,...� .. .,... 1 PflOP�OSTORp EEWE{f•-"nv... _ 1
:1 G� ' ..• STOtiMSEWEp � ' � � 70 C �� J4.�-•.• .
'�' T � \ �.-0lTp(,•i� . ''"
.. � ° ) � � ,l L ' I � x �o . i � Qeoe.��`_`� J
�`. � n f. I � � a01.,1 LEGEND
:\�\ .-�-���. �.ii i , r-r---•�.��.- i � '1 v � � ---- �
/ 'j%� %/ ��: ! i� . �,� .,._.. �� .�.r .. ..� �. C� .. OGP-8 GAS.YENT
O t � �i '%' iii'� - ' ..i• \ 1
\ ` � . � / j ��/� �/'� / ��� �/i i ; :�� : .-�i.�;S! � � \\� (.r✓....:.. . ._�,
� - :��� �- /- // ��''%,:, , . N < + �:. ( ,:, r .
i % i ' 10 ` r� \ � C�. • • MW-E MOWTOHINO WELL
� ;.. j�-/.�/�// j%/ ; �./: ,. . ;,,;;; , P�� � . �� �� �:::: � t � �
�� �- , ��/ ,�/�; •i,i ���-,•;,;� � �' ..� �\� �.
� 1 .< . � ...�.\�\� . � � .
� \ � �i//. � ��/i��'/�/� � �/ f � I ---'90l--_� PROPOSEDCOHTOUR
� �. � � i� / %. �, ; � � `/ � ` Y � PROPOSEO 1.26' COPPEIi WATER SEqVICE
� \ � �\�\\\� , i /i%.i �.///,'.i,/• /' //�' -//��,'•� •:'/ � p 1 � . 910.6 PfiOPOSEDSPOTEIEVATtON
� •� �.,. / / � / / i � y n (6' OIP IF qECU1RE0 FOR FIqE PROTECTION ,
� ��. I- � CB !t 1 ��i. /�,'�' �/,%/%: i/�// %�.. '� �' : // ? ' � `
sT ME� r� � %�� � i%�� �j ..�i i;/, - _ � ��\ � �
\ \.. ' / /// //�///� /� �: /,�//�„/�/.�' � I n � �� ��\\�\ \ \ "\\ ���' I) . . °'- � PROPOSEO DRAfNA6E DIRECTION �.
� ' � � �//' � //�:i� / 90I.�
\ ��� \ , y ii� ,//;�/ // %/.�� \\�.. ��.,
\��` \ \�'\ � ;;;j/, j: j��. , � � � �� �i .�� /�/�/, %�, o < \•� .- 9�)B 7 J -- ��� I I 6RADING LIMITS
" PROPOSEO 6' PyC SANIT'AI(Y"Q--� -� t
• � / / /, . � '1 � - _ _ _.. . .� � ( I oaomn000a EROSION CONTROI
� � \ i / � ��� �� � / / / i"��; j.� � �:;. ` � o�• ° � E -_._ I � I � n00000
j // � / � � � � o IT 1 U � � 1 \ , . I I
� \ .\• \� ./�, �� %/ � � //�!/ / �i j �i::'i ° .) � \: �.\�` L J ��
� -�� ,.� /i../ ,�;,, ///� / � � ,,::: �.� ��� }j
� %"" i�;� � � - i/� ';!��j , f i ,\ �'; �� ;
\ \ \ / i / � � � i �i�.. %;;, ';, � � �. �
`� � \ j/ .i � %j' j',//% i '/:';,� � . QFF�CE \ � :\• ( II�I I
� � ' CB +�2 / �� .///,; ./ .., �; ' � �, � �•. � I � • STRUCTURES REQUTAING FOUNOATION EXCAVATION
� ST MH Y2 / . �jj/ ///j� / / / . �% � 910 STORACiE 010.0 �\\;\\� Mw I �
�.�.\ \� . ��/�� ��/ .� -'���� ��. ( . . \.\'��. A III
� � �' � \ � �\ % /� �' ����� j///i "•'%�. . ;' ' '! � %�: I � � BUS WASM DRAIN\ �' �•�• i , I � I� L OFfICE� STORAGE� MAINTENANCE BUILD�NO COMPIEX.
: � � \\ 1 �i�it. i��: � AND THApS Q_�r Z! _;,�_� � III) I 4. SUPPORTS fOR ABOYE GROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS.
� � .�:�� � � � �a 9 . � � ����. � -- - I
. \ Si MH x3 • I,-i ��.j� � � - 1 I .J. HOOF SUPPOti7S FOfl BUS SHED
�\ .� i. / ��'/i / I
4 \ ( ��
. .� %//, / � �- ;; : � �
\\ \ \ \\, / ij�����% ' '�� 9( • � X 07 .6 � �
\�\ . - ___- _ - . . �_ � _„a _ �� � VC N TUf 1 i ii� �
� ` � �` - � .. - < . Y � - � � - � �� ,�� I
� � , - \ �1 �•: �� ��. ��� �
\ \ \\\ ` \ CB x3 __'_� I \ Y PflOPOSED ORAVEI SUpFAQE
� ` \ ST MH Y4: � \ �- __, � FUEL TANKS �. � , 8U8 STORAdE ! / I ^ I !'� I I I �
��\ , ...� Q��...-, � _ , _ I,I� ,
, \� \ , aa�oE �� � . � _� --- ,.�, � ^ �'�--��,� \�� � � J i I I
..\ \ AflEA yyy_g . / 3 _ / /— � QP-D.(RE / � I I ../ atic- - Itg =N sp('= -
\\ \� � - - -' - - . . i X 91 1 . 0 TO ORAIN �� � I l' �i/ LAC ) '� ' � c �
\ QU w IUSE ON�SITE MATENIA� � ,~� �� I / ~ `�O � � �-� � I ( � I �
\\� '� SSRADINQ LtMITS � � aAANULAR BOFIROW) ��� ' ' MW-E / y �� I�� 6' CLASS b, �/� MIHUS-100X
� - ' C - _� O� AIELOCATEf . � ' /�/ /. �
-�� I p p � ! CRUSHED OUARRY STONE
� `~ �-- � �t � \\ g�s SNE 90J. � 9�� ` j OUTLET G VAHIABLE THICKNESS-
\\ \ \ ' BI � � \ _ ` / ___ f / Y� I�'£/� ��� GRANULAR LEVEIER
\ \ � X 9 t ;1. / � ' � _ � � � j /� SUBGNADE-E%ISTIHQ
\ 1 / �— � � ��/ � FILL MATERIAL (OVEp fiARBAGE
\ � C � ( � 1 ' '�_�'� �� = // VAHIABLE TMICKNESSI
�� � l� \ % �" --� � �
\ � ��. \ � � / i TYPICAL SECTION
\ � / �� �� �� / �` _� � ; Z 7 �� GRAVEL SURFACEO BUS STOHAGE AREA
ST CBMH x6 � ��/ G � EF�
_ ap �� ��� / � ' ,`
\ S T \x 5 -- -- -- ' _ /
\ fNO,�gSe� t ' X 909.0 ,� At �� � � ' i �1� � : l
\ c
\ � `•O /'
ST C�MH x7 V� ER pa py.1M� SE ��9�0 i l �C� I�I N
\ \\ P ` I � �0 12.� X 899�� I I I I I J
\ ST CBMH x8 - Si "��1— � �• y jp� � 1 I
y 91 I. I -_-- ,. fl �. i �� �� . 1 I I I W ���
� �— ��, � �= �" I I�I � E
. ��� \. , �, _��9;: .�,—� � hI 1� �� .
\\\\ �� --�� ,���' � l � `�-5�� � \ I' II � s
� � � �.-� . 1'� �'� _� 898.9 \ I I; I ( j —
/ •� ��l`✓ i\ /� q i- X I I I II � ' iw
� �- !, � ✓ , _ 1 jti � ,�� — ---�$- -- � � I � � SCALE a r�r
--- ---� �- ._ , , _, I I �
� ,�..� ,�= %-�- _ � � .
- .�i.t -�s�'-� -j 9 � �,�,- ) - � 9 (� � � p �
�'`'' 9,: � �� <<,�.5 %� //, �, \ � 1 .. soo , �� . , � � .
€ . � /. > > �i - �/ .. � �--- - .
� �
PREUMINARY JUNE 24, 1994
REVISIONS CERTIPICAT�ON I OWNER / OEVELOPER PROJECT NAME / SHEET TITLE
DATE eY AE��s�o�,S • SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. �
' � � � � � � UTILI7Y, GRADING, DRAINAGE,
CK'D ��� �� � � �� M EN(i1NEEpS • SUNYEYONS • PLANNEflS -
BY j;,.n., „� �y,� � w��t SOII TESTINO • ENYIpONMENTAI SEHVICES FRED HANUS
h��fw.� .1 �� _ hObCO WAYZATA BOULEVARD. suire,� . - AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN �
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 6b�05 '
� Iq. W.._, � (012) 6a6-7607 FAX: 6�l-9086 � ' - DATE: �