Loading...
IV.3. Ordinance 2024-1214 - Cargill Outlot Rezoning CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE 2024-1214 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PROPERTY AT 100 JACKSON AVE N (WITH PID 19-117-21-31-0069) FROM IX-S, EMPLOYMENT MIX SUBURBAN CENTER WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO RX-TOD, RESIDENTIAL-OFFICE MIX TOD CENTER WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the following described premises is hereby rezoned from IX-S, Employment Mix Suburban Center with a Planned Unit Development to RX-TOD, Residential- Office Mix Transit Oriented Development Center with a Planned Unit Development. 2. The property to be rezoned is legally described in Exhibit A. First Reading: September 3, 2024 Second Reading: September 10, 2024 Date of Publication: September 19, 2024 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: September 19, 2024 ________________________ ATTEST: Patrick Hanlon, Mayor __________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk Exhibit A Legal Description of Subject Parcel That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Excelsior Crossings 2nd Addition, embraced within the following described three parcels: (1) Lot 3, Block 1, Excelsior Crossings (2) Lots 1 and 10, Block 13, West Minneapolis Center, and the vacated North and South alley in said Block 13; and Lots 14 and 15, except the East 16 feet of Lots 14 and 15, Block 4, West Minneapolis Center, and that part of vacated First Street North, dedicated in West Minneapolis Center, lying between the Southerly extensions across it of the West line of the East 16.00 feet of Lot 14 and the West line of Lot 14 in Block 4, West Minneapolis Center and that part of the South Half of vacated First Street North, dedicated in the plat of West Minneapolis Center, lying easterly of the southerly extension of the west line of the East 16 feet of Lot 14, Block 4, said plat, and westerly of a line drawn from the southeast corner of Lot 13, said block, to the most northerly northwest corner of Parcel 34C, City of Hopkins Highway Right-of-Way Plat No. 1 (3) That part of vacated 1st Street North, dedicated in the plat of Excelsior Crossings, described as beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, said plat: thence on an assumed bearing of South 87 degrees 31 minutes 58 seconds East, along the north line of said Lot 4, a distance of 17.50 feet; thence North 43 degrees 53 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 15.57 feet to the west line of said 1st Street North: thence South 32 degrees 35 minutes 57 seconds West, along said west line of 1st Street North, a distance of 12.42 feet to the point of beginning. CITY OF HOPKINS City Council Report 2024-110 To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Mike Mornson, City Manager From: PeggySue Imihy, AICP – Special Projects and Initiatives Manger Date: September 10, 2024 Subject: Award Contract for Central Park Master Plan and Pavilion Feasibility Study _____________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDED ACTION MOTION TO AWARD CONTRACT WITH BOLTON AND MENK NOT TO EXCEED $291,724 FOR A CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN AND PAVILION FEASIBILITY STUDY. OVERVIEW Following the update made at the August 20, 2024, Council Meeting regarding the Park System Master Plan and Central Park Project, Staff seeks the awarding of a contract to Bolton and Menk and their subconsultants for the Central Park and Pavilion projects. As discussed at the August 20th meeting, this project would provide design and construction documents for the renovation of Central Park and a study to understand the feasibility of a future expansion of the Hopkins Pavilion. This also includes a significant evaluation of the soil conditions and potential contamination through the park from previous illegal dumping activities. This project would be done in partnership with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) who has offered to contribute both staff capacity and funding to the project. The total cost of the initial design and feasibility is $291,724 which will be paid with park dedication fees and a $50,000 contribution from NMCWD. The City currently has $526,100 in restricted park dedication funds which can be allocated to this project. Final Design and Construction will come before the City Council following this phase, likely in 2026. For project construction staff will be seeking all available grant and partnership opportunities through the County, State and other partners. SUPPORTING INFORMATION • Professional Services Agreement with Bolton and Menk Administration City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 1 of 9 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA This Agreement, made this 10th day of September 2024, by and between CITY OF HOPKINS, 1010 1st St S, Hopkins, MN 55343, hereinafter referred to as CLIENT, and BOLTON & MENK, INC., 12224 Nicollet Avenue, Burnsville, MN 55337, hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT. WITNESS, whereas the CLIENT requires professional services in conjunction with the CENTRAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY and whereas the CONSULTANT agrees to furnish the various professional services required by the CLIENT. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, it is agreed: SECTION I - CONSULTANT'S SERVICES A. The CONSULTANT agrees to perform the various Basic Services in connection with the proposed project as described in Exhibit I. B. Upon mutual agreement of the parties hereto, Additional Services may be authorized as described in Exhibit I or as described in Paragraph IV.B. SECTION II - THE CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. The CLIENT shall promptly compensate the CONSULTANT in accordance with Section III of this Agreement. B. The CLIENT shall place any and all information related to the project in its custody at the disposal of the CONSULTANT for its use. Such information shall include but shall not be limited boundary surveys, topographic surveys, preliminary sketch plan layouts, building plans, soil surveys, abstracts, deed descriptions, tile maps and layouts, aerial photos, utility agreements, environmental reviews, and zoning limitations. The CONSULTANT may rely upon the accuracy and sufficiency of all such information in performing services unless otherwise instructed, in writing, by CLIENT. This obligation shall not include information that is classified as private or confidential under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (MGDPA), unless access to such information is essential to the CONSULTANT’s scope of services, in which case the CLIENT shall establish in writing, and CONSULTANT shall comply with, any conditions governing access to and use of such private or confidential information. C. The CLIENT will guarantee access to and make all provisions for entry upon both public and private portions of the project and pertinent adjoining properties. D. The CLIENT will give prompt notice to the CONSULTANT whenever the CLIENT observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the proposed project. City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 2 of 9 E. The CLIENT shall designate a liaison person to act as the CLIENT'S representative with respect to services to be rendered under this Agreement. Said representative shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive instructions, receive information, interpret and define the CLIENT'S policies with respect to the project and CONSULTANT'S services. F. The CLIENT shall provide such legal, accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as may be required for completion of the consultant services described in this agreement. G. The CLIENT will obtain any and all regulatory permits required for the proper and legal execution of the project. H. The CLIENT will hire, when requested by the CONSULTANT, an independent test company to perform laboratory and material testing services, and soil investigation that can be justified for the proper design and construction of the project. The CONSULTANT shall assist the CLIENT in selecting a testing company. Payment for testing services shall be made directly to the testing company by the CLIENT and is not part of this Agreement. City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 3 of 9 SECTION III - COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES A. FEES. 1. The CLIENT will compensate the CONSULTANT in accordance with the following schedule of fees for the time spent in performance of Agreement services. Schedule of Fees Classification Hourly Rates Sr. Project Manager – Sr. Principal Engineer/Surveyor $155-280/Hour Sr. Project Manager – Principal Engineer/Surveyor $150-225/Hour Project Manager $135-195/Hour Project/Design Engineer /Planner/Surveyor/Landscape Architect $120-190/Hour Specialist (Nat. Resources; GIS; Traffic; Other) $90-150/Hour Senior Technician (Inc. Survey1) $110-180/Hour Technician (Inc. Survey1) $100-150/Hour Administrative/Corporate Specialists $90-125/Hour Structural/Electrical/Mechanical/Architect $120-$150/Hour GPS/Robotic Survey Equipment No Charge CAD/Computer Usage No Charge Routine Photo Copying/Reproduction No Charge Routine Office Supplies No Charge Field Supplies/Survey Stakes & Equipment No Charge Mileage No Charge 1No separate charges will be made for GPS or robotic total stations on Bolton & Menk, Inc. survey assignments; the cost of this equipment is included in the rates for Survey Technicians. 2. Total cost for the services itemized under Exhibit I, Tasks 1-7 (Basic Services) is estimated to be $269,031. Total cost for the services itemized under Exhibit I, Task 10 (Add Alternative Services) is estimated to be $22,693. Itemization of this cost is as shown in the attached DETAILED WORK PLAN and PROJECT FEES tables, attached hereto as Exhibit II. 3. In addition to the foregoing, CONSULTANT shall be reimbursed at cost plus an overhead fee (not-to-exceed 10%) for the following Direct Expenses when incurred in the performance of the work. a. CLIENT approved outside (facilities not owned by CONSULTANT) computer services. b. CLIENT approved outside professional and technical services. c. Outside reproduction and reprographic charges. d. Expendable field supplies and special field equipment rental. e. Other costs for such additional items and services that the CLIENT may require the CONSULTANT to provide to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. 4. Additional services as outlined in Section I.B will vary depending upon project conditions and will be billed on an hourly basis at the rate described in Section III.A.1. 5. The payment to the CONSULTANT will be made by the CLIENT upon billing at intervals not more often than monthly at the herein rates. Itemized invoices identifying all work completed shall be submitted to the CLIENT by CONSULTANT and paid in the same manner as other claims made to the CLIENT. City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 4 of 9 SECTION IV - GENERAL A. STANDARD OF CARE Professional services provided under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the Consultant's profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No warranty, express or implied, is made. B. CHANGE IN PROJECT SCOPE In the event the CLIENT changes or is required to change the scope of the project from that described in Section I and/or the applicable addendum, and such changes require Additional Services by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to additional compensation at the applicable hourly rates. The CONSULTANT shall give notice to the CLIENT of any Additional Services, prior to furnishing such additional services and the CLIENT must approve an Additional Services in writing. The CLIENT may request an estimate of additional cost from the CONSULTANT, and upon receipt of the request, the CONSULTANT shall furnish such, prior to authorization of the changed scope of work. C. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The CONSULTANT shall at times be deemed an independent contractor. The CONSULTANT is not to be deemed an employee or agent of the CLIENT and has no authority to make any binding commitments or obligations on behalf of the CLIENT except to the extent expressly provided herein. All services provided by the CONSUTANT pursuant to this agreement shall be provide on an independent contractor basis not as an employee of the CLIENT for any purpose including, but not limited to, income tax withholding, workers’ compensation, unemployment compensation, FICA taxes, liability for torts, and eligibility for employee benefits. D. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CLIENT and its officials, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability, and expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses of litigation) arising from, or based in the whole, or in any part, on any negligent act or omission by CONSULTANT’S employees, agents, or subconsultants. In no event shall CLIENT be liable to CONSULTANT for consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages. CLIENT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CONSULTANT and its employees and subconsultants from any loss, claim, liability, and expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses of litigation) arising from, or based in the whole, or in any part, on any negligent act or omission by CLIENT’S employees, agents, or consultants. In no event shall CONSULTANT be liable to CLIENT for consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a limitation on or waiver of any immunities or limitations on liability otherwise available to the CLIENT. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT'S services under this Agreement are being performed solely for the CLIENT'S benefit, and no other entity shall have any claim against the CONSULTANT because of this Agreement or the performance or nonperformance of services provided hereunder. The CLIENT agrees to include a provision in all City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 5 of 9 contracts with contractors and other entities involved in this project to carry out the intent of the paragraph. E. INSURANCE 1. The CONSULTANT agrees to maintain, at CONSULTANT’S expense a commercial general liability and excess umbrella general liability insurance policy or policies insuring CONSULTANT against claims for bodily injury, death or property damage arising out of CONSULTANT’S general business activities. The general liability coverage shall provide limits of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and not less than $2,000,000 general aggregate. Coverage shall include Premises and Operations Bodily Injury and Property Damage; Personal and Advertising Injury; Blanket Contractual Liability; Products and Completed Operations Liability. 2. The CONSULTANT also agrees to maintain, at CONSULTANT’S expense, a single limit or combined limit automobile liability insurance and excess umbrella liability policy or policies insuring owned, non-owned and hired vehicles used by CONSULTANT under this Agreement. The automobile liability coverages shall provide limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for property damage, $2,000,000 for bodily injuries, death and damages to any one person and $2,000,000 for total bodily injury, death and damage claims arising from one accident. 3. CLIENT shall be named Additional Insured for the above liability policies. 4. The CONSULTANT agrees to maintain, at the CONSULTANT'S expense, statutory worker's compensation coverage together with Coverage B, Employer’s Liability limits of not less than $500,000 for Bodily Injury by Disease per employee, $500,000.00 for Bodily Injury by Disease aggregate and $500,000 for Bodily Injury by Accident. 5. During the period of design and construction of the project, the CONSULTANT also agrees to maintain, at CONSULTANT’S expense, Professional Liability Insurance coverage insuring CONSULTANT against damages for legal liability arising from an error, omission or negligent act in the performance of professional services required by this agreement. The professional liability insurance coverage shall provide limits of not less than $2,000,000 per claim and an annual aggregate of not less than $2,000,000 on a claims-made basis. 6. Prior to commencement of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT will provide the CLIENT with certificates of insurance, showing evidence of required coverages. All policies of insurance shall contain a provision or endorsement that the coverage afforded will not be canceled or reduced in limits by endorsement for any reason except non-payment of premium, until at least 30 days’ prior written notice has been given to the CLIENT, and at least 10 days’ prior written notice in the case of non-payment of premium. F. OPINIONS OR ESTIMATES OF CONSTRUCTION COST Where provided by the CONSULTANT as part of Exhibit I or otherwise, opinions or estimates of construction cost will generally be based upon public construction cost information. Since the CONSULTANT has no control over the cost of labor, materials, competitive bidding process, weather conditions and other factors affecting the cost of construction, all cost estimates are opinions for general information of the CLIENT and the CONSULTANT does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of construction cost opinions or estimates. The CLIENT acknowledges that City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 6 of 9 costs for project financing should be based upon contracted construction costs with appropriate contingencies. G. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES It is agreed that the CONSULTANT and its representatives shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, schedules or procedures of construction selected by the contractor or the safety precautions or programs incident to the work of the contractor. H. USE OF ELECTRONIC/DIGITAL DATA Because of the potential instability of electronic/digital data and susceptibility to unauthorized changes, copies of documents that may be relied upon by CLIENT are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that are signed or sealed by CONSULTANT. Except for electronic/digital data which is specifically identified as a project deliverable by this AGREEMENT or except as otherwise explicitly provided in this AGREEMENT, all electronic/digital data developed by the CONSULTANT as part of the PROJECT is acknowledged to be an internal working document for the CONSULTANT’S purposes solely and any such information provided to the CLIENT shall be on an “AS IS” basis strictly for the convenience of the CLIENT without any warranties of any kind. As such, the CLIENT is advised and acknowledges that use of such information may require substantial modification and independent verification by the CLIENT (or its designees). Provision of electronic/digital data, whether required by this Agreement or provided as a convenience to the Client, does not include any license of software or other systems necessary to read, use or reproduce the information. It is the responsibility of the CLIENT to verify compatibility with its system and long-term stability of media. CLIENT shall indemnify and hold harmless CONSULTANT and its Subconsultants from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from third party use or any adaptation or distribution of electronic/digital data provided under this AGREEMENT, unless such third party use and adaptation or distribution is explicitly authorized by this AGREEMENT. I. DATA PRACTICES All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated, or used for any purposes in the course of the CONSULTANT’S performance of the Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 13.01, et seq. or any other applicable state statutes and state rules adopted to implement the Act, as well as state statutes and federal regulations on data privacy. The Consultant agrees to abide by these statutes, rules and regulations and as they may be amended. In the event the CONSULTANT receives a request to release data, it shall notify CLIENT as soon as practical. The CLIENT will give instructions concerning release of data to requesting party and CONSULTANT will be reimbursed as Additional Services by CLIENT for its reasonable expenses in complying with the request. City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 7 of 9 J. PERIOD OF AGREEMENT This Agreement will remain in effect for the longer of a period of two years or such other explicitly identified completion period, after which time the Agreement may be extended upon mutual agreement of both parties. K PAYMENTS If CLIENT fails to make any payment due CONSULTANT for services and expenses within 60 days after date of the CONSULTANT'S itemized invoice, a service charge of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is less, will be charged on any unpaid balance. In addition after giving seven days' written notice to CLIENT, CONSULTANT may, without waiving any claim or right against the CLIENT and without incurring liability whatsoever to the CLIENT, suspend services and withhold project deliverables due under this Agreement until CONSULTANT has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. L. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the CLIENT for any reason or for convenience by the CLIENT upon seven (7) days written notice. The CONSULTANT may only terminate for non- payment by CLIENT upon CLIENT’s failure to cure upon 30 days written notice. M. CONTINGENT FEE The CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT to solicit or secure this Contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from award or making of this Agreement. N. NON-DISCRIMINATION The provisions of any applicable law or ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination shall be considered part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. The CONSULTANT is an Equal Opportunity Employer and it is the policy of the CONSULTANT that all employees, persons seeking employment, subcontractors, subconsultants and vendors are treated without regard to their race, religion, sex, color, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status, public assistance status or any other characteristic protected by federal, state or local law. O. CONTROLLING LAW This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of Minnesota. City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 8 of 9 P. DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLIENT and CONSULTANT agree to negotiate all disputes between them in good faith for a period of 30 days from the date of notice of dispute prior to proceeding to formal dispute resolution or exercising their rights under law. Q. SURVIVAL All obligations, representations and provisions made in or given in Section IV of this Agreement will survive the completion of all services of the CONSULTANT under this Agreement or the termination of this Agreement for any reason. R. SEVERABILITY Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable under any law or regulation shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and binding upon CLIENT and CONSULTANT, who agree that the Agreement shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision. S. AUDIT DISCLOSURE The CONSULTANT must allow the CLIENT, or its duly authorized agents, and the state auditor or legislative auditor reasonable access to the CONSULTANT’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices that are pertinent to all services provided under this Agreement for a minimum of six years from the termination of this Agreement. [remainder of the page intentionally blank] City of Hopkins Standard Agreement (Modified from 2004 Standard Form) VER. 12/05/2017 Page 9 of 9 SECTION V - SIGNATURES THIS INSTRUMENT embodies the whole agreement of the parties, there being no promises, terms, conditions or obligation referring to the subject matter other than contained herein. This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly executed written instrument signed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed in their behalf. CLIENT: City of Hopkins, Minnesota CONSULTANT: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Mike Waltman, P.E., Burnsville Work Group Leader 9/10/2024 Date Date CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION Task 1 includes time and effort to align the project team around important project management objectives, such as communication protocols, critical milestones and delivery dates, and the final engagement plan, including preliminary identification of key stakeholders, community organizations, and partner agencies. 1.1 SCHEDULE OF WORK TASKS To communicate and track the schedule and task completion, the detailed project schedule will be reviewed with city staff to confirm all desired milestones, building off this proposed work plan. Within our scope of work, our Bolton & Menk project manager will actively maintain the schedule with updates shared routinely with the city’s project management team at recurring check-in meetings. The schedule will continue to be focused on project milestones and deliverable dates, and will identify the responsible party for each deliverable and required review/response periods. This schedule will be refined through discussion with staff based on the input from various agencies and stakeholder needs, public engagement, and the data collection required for project delivery. 1.2 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #1 This initial meeting will bring city staff and key project team members together to ensure everyone understands the project scope, schedule and deliverables. Discussion and review will include overall project goals, critical success factors, project schedule, engagement and work plan, data needs and availability, and communication protocols. The Bolton & Menk team will provide meeting agendas and summaries for all staff coordination meetings. Task 1 Meetings • City staff coordination meeting #1 Task 1 Deliverables • Updated engagement plan and schedule of work tasks TASK 2: DATA COLLECTION 2.1 TOPOGRAPHIC & BOUNDARY SURVEY Bolton & Menk will complete a topographic and boundary survey, on the city’s standard datum, for the project site, as defined on the enclosed project location and issues map. The survey will establish property boundary limits and topographic conditions needed for final design and plan documentation that meets city standards. 2.2 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND PHASE 1 ESA Braun Intertec will apply their existing knowledge of the site to inform the feasibility of an expansion to the Hopkins Pavilion and site renovation of Central Park. It is understood that the proposed pavilion expansion is assumed to be a slab-on-grade facility with one story above (using conventional foundations and steel framing), along with site improvements for Central Park to potentially include a new soccer field, new volleyball courts, additional pickleball courts, and new proposed shade structures. In response to the RFP scope of work, we have reviewed the statutory requirements for requiring an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and do not see a mandatory EAW being required for this project. While it is possible the city could require an EAW of itself, we do not anticipate the need for further evaluation of an EAW. Recognizing the underlying soil conditions that our team has familiarity with; however, we would recommend a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) be completed for the site coupled with necessary geotechnical field investigation. Braun Intertec’s exploration work on-site dates back to at least 1968. A 1968 report by Braun indicates environmental impacts from the landfill including ‘dump debris’, wood, glass, rubber, paper, tin, etc. In 2015 Braun’s most recent on-site environmental work took place in the northwest parking lot, SCOPE OF SERVICES CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 01 Exhibit I adjacent to the pickleball courts. During oversight of the excavations, Braun and Bolton & Menk staff observed debris such as concrete, asphalt, glass bottles, wood, rebar, coal, and miscellaneous garbage. Petroleum odors were also documented. Our team understands that in the mid-1960s, this landfill activity moved further south in Hopkins and ultimately a much larger landfill by surface area was created, though Central Park soils may be comprised of similar material. To identify and comprehensively document the history of the site, Braun Intertec will conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the site in accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) Practice E1527-21 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312. The purpose of the Phase I ESA will be to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the property. The Phase I ESA will include a government and historical records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, and data evaluation. The results of the Phase I ESA will be summarized in a written report, provided electronically, documenting information sources used, findings and conclusions, and the professional opinion of Braun Intertec regarding the impact of any potential environmental concerns in connection with the site. Appendices to the report will include copies of available historical information (e.g., fire insurance maps, aerial photographs, etc.). In addition the scope of the Phase I ESA, Braun Intertec will collect on-site soil boring information to bolster the understanding of the site. Three soil borings will be taken for the preliminary expansion considerations at the Pavilion. The purpose of this initial geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the preliminary design information for the Pavilion Expansion. Braun Intertec will also perform these six borings in Central Park (for a total of nine locations) to nominal depths of 15 to 25 feet below existing grade for the project. Braun will perform standard penetration tests at 2.5-foot vertical intervals to a depth of about 15 feet, and at 5-foot intervals at greater depths. An additional six locations will be used to assist in identifying the horizontal and vertical limits of the landfill. 2.3 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS We will review information from previous planning efforts that inform the current and future use of Central Park and the Pavilion, and provide a brief summary of how the following plans impact the plan for Central Park and the Pavilion: • City of Hopkins Park System Plan 2023 • Cultivate Hopkins 2040 Comprehensive Plan (as prepared by Bolton & Menk) • City of Hopkins Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Concept Plan (as prepared by Barr Engineering) • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Flood Study (as prepared by Barr Engineering) • ParkServe - Trust for Public Land 2.4 ONLINE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Early engagement of the public should include opportunities for input on proposed amenities, facilities, program, and priorities. An online survey allows people to engage and provide input at their convenience. We will work with staff to develop a survey tailored for Central Park and the Pavilion. It is anticipated that this online engagement will include a questionnaire and an INPUTiDTM map to allow respondents to provide place-based comments on a map of the park. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 02SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I 2.5 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #2 In addition to project updates and outlining of next steps, city staff coordination meeting #2 will include a review and discussion of the previous planning efforts summary to ensure the project team is aligned with city staff on key components of Central Park’s position within the larger system of parks, recreation, and community developments. This meeting will also be used to review findings from the site survey and geotechnical evaluation. 2.6 UPDATE MEMO #1 We will provide a project update memo to share project status and key findings from Task 2 Data Collection Task 2 Meetings • City staff coordination meeting #2 Task 2 Deliverables: • Topographic and boundary survey • Baseline geotechnical report • Summary of previous planning efforts • Online public engagement: questionnaire and INPUTiDTM map • Update Memo #1 TASK 3: CENTRAL PARK NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS 3.1 SITE TOUR To begin the assessment of the quality and condition of existing assets, the project team will visit the park and pavilion with key staff to deepen our knowledge and understanding of the site. Inventory and analysis will include assessment of the parks: • Baseball fields (2) • Tennis courts (4) on ISD 270 property • Picnic facilities (grills, tables) • Outdoor hockey rink/wiffleball enclosure • Open skating rink • Parking • Pickleball courts (5) • Shelters (2) • Playground • Restrooms/warming house • Soccer/football field • Softball field • Site connectivity and circulations (all modes) • Existing vegetation • Experiential and visual quality • Lighting • Habitat/ecological conditions • Current park maintenance practices 3.2 PRELIMINARY ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES DIAGRAM To summarize and begin synthesizing our findings from the site visit, we will develop a Preliminary Issues and Opportunities Diagram for Central Park. This deliverable will summarize/synthesize findings from all previous tasks to supplement the site tour information, including contextual information from previous planning efforts. This diagram will continue to be developed and evolve, layering findings from engagement and data collection tasks. 3.3 POP-UP EVENTS AND YOUTH- FOCUSED ENGAGEMENT SUPPORT We anticipate supporting pop-up and youth listening sessions conducted by city staff to get input from community members in the project area to understand how they use and would like to use Central Park. The Bolton & Menk Team will provide one set of engagement materials for use by the city for pop-up events and one set of materials for youth listening sessions to be conducted by the city. 3.4 PARTNER AGENCIES, COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, AND KEY STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS We will work with the city to host coordinated meetings with stakeholder groups and key partner agencies and organizations to gather information and give project updates. This is key to developing a plan that is informed and CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 03SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I supported by the community partners. We envision a revolving door style set of in-person meetings where feasible and schedules allow. Virtual meetings can also be facilitated should they be preferred by any group or individual. 3.5 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #3 City staff coordination meeting #3 will be used to review findings from the pop-up engagement meetings, youth engagement, and stakeholder meetings from Subtask 3.4. We will also use this time to discuss objectives for and status of the ongoing ecological and natural resources investigations being conducted by the project team. 3.6 IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE ECOLOGY AND WILDLIFE HABITAT Our team will identify preliminary opportunities to reduce maintenance requirements, improve ecology, and create wildlife habitat. We will look for opportunities to reduce impervious surfaces, minimize turf, improve ecological habitat, and protect existing trees. Opportunities identified during this task will then be detailed during concept and design development. 3.7 DETERMINE BMPS TO MEET NMCWD REQUIREMENTS Nine Mile Creek Watershed District rules require stormwater management be included as part of site redesign to minimize or reduce the impacts of redevelopment on downstream waterbodies. The amount of stormwater management required will be based on the proposed work at the park (site disturbance and impervious surfaces). Our team will consider those permit triggers to estimate pollutant reduction and stormwater rate control requirements for the site based on the conceptual plan for Central Park and the Pavilion. Actual best management practice (BMP) design and sizing will be closely integrated with concept development and will likely be impacted by the underlying condition of the site. 3.8 DETERMINE WATER QUALITY BMPS THAT ARE "ABOVE AND BEYOND" OPPORTUNITIES Alongside determination of the stormwater management requirements, we will help identify stormwater practices considered "above and beyond" the requirements that could be eligible for funding from project partners or other granting organizations. For this task, we will help quantify thresholds for BMPs that would exceed NMCWD requirements that may be eligible for funding. Based on discussions with NMCWD staff, those BMPs of most interest and alignment with organizational goals will be considered as preliminary designs are developed in Task 4. 3.9 DETERMINE FEASIBILITY AND BENEFITS OF FLOODWATER STORAGE IN CENTRAL PARK The Barr/BMI design team will develop creative flood management concepts that align our unique understanding of the hydrology of the site with critical recreational components. Prior to concept development, we will work with the City of Hopkins to develop design criteria, such as acceptable frequency and duration of floodwater impacts, to ensure the design concepts are aligned with intended park usage. The feasibility analysis will include modeling of two flood management concepts ranging in size to help determine the magnitude of flood management necessary to improve adjacent and downstream flood issues. Management of flood water in Central Park may have a significant impact on the character of the park due to infrastructure elevations and topography. As such, it will be necessary to discuss results and gauge cost implications with partner organizations, including consideration of potential grant funding sources. This subtask includes: • Refinements to existing conditions XP-SWMM model based on up-to-date data from Hopkins • Develop and model flood storage concepts with project team • Prepare cost estimate for preferred flood storage concept • Prepare summary of results, including feasibility considerations, benefits, and costs 3.10 DETERMINE FEASIBILITY OF INTEGRATING NINE MILE CREEK HEADWATERS The location of Central Park is unique in its proximity to Nine Mile Creek at its source, or headwaters. This fact is unknown to many, making this a remarkable opportunity to showcase the water resource itself and to create a distinctive placemaking feature that speaks to visitors about their relationship to water quality and habitat in their urban watershed. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 04SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I During the park concept development phase, our team will consider opportunities to manage the water in a way that: • Makes the resource visible and accessible • Provides educational or engagement opportunities • Creates a unique user experience not seen within the Hopkins park system The feasibility analysis will include preparing sketches of potential headwaters concepts and identifying preferred options for water source (e.g., surface drainage or re-routing of storm pipes from upstream neighborhoods). The magnitude of this feature is likely to be impacted by the underlying condition of the site, and so may change in scale within the two proposed concept plans as described in Task 4. 3.11 NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS SUMMARY The Bolton & Menk team will prepare a needs assessment and analysis summary detailing the work done to date, including a summary of key findings from engagement activities, feasibility studies, and the identification of issues and opportunities. This report will include any recommended program, amenity, and facility updates to the existing Central Park Concept Plans from the 2023 Hopkins Park System Plan and the NMCWD. 3.12 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #4 City staff coordination meeting #4 will focus on the review of the Needs Assessment and Analysis Report, findings from the Community Co-Design Meeting #2 and next steps of concept development. 3.13 UPDATE MEMO #2 We will provide a project update memo to share project status and key findings from the needs assessment and analysis tasks Task 3 Meetings • Site tour • Partner agency, community organization, and key stakeholder meetings (up to 10) • Staff coordination meetings (2) Task 3 Deliverables • Preliminary issues and opportunities diagram • Engagement materials for city use for pop-up events and youth engagement • Needs assessment and analysis summary • Update Memo #2 TASK 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN With a full understanding and confirmation of desired amenities, facilities, programs, site conditions, constraints, opportunities, and feasibility of stormwater and ecological improvements our team will be ready to move into preliminary concept design. 4.1 PRELIMINARY DRAFT CONCEPTS We will produce two alternative concepts that respond to two likely scenarios for Central Park that emerge from our feasibility findings in Task 3. We will also develop planning-level cost estimates for each concept. Graphics will include plan drawings, sections, and output from 3D study models, as needed to illustrate the design intent at the conceptual level. 4.2 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #5 City staff coordination meeting #5 will focus on getting feedback on the draft concept alternatives to make refinements for a joint Park Board / City Council workshop, in addition to general project updates and actions for next steps. 4.3 PARK BOARD MEETING #1 The Bolton & Menk team will provide the Park Board with an overall project update including schedule, process, and findings from previous tasks, including public engagement, needs assessment and analysis, and feasibility studies. Preliminary draft concepts will also be presented for comment and input from Park Board members ahead of a joint workshop with City Council. 4.4 PARK BOARD / CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP The Bolton & Menk Team will develop presentation materials for a joint workshop with City Council and the Park Board to get feedback from both groups on the preliminary draft concepts before they are distributed for public comment. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 05SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I 4.5 ONLINE ENGAGEMENT Preliminary draft concepts will be shared on the INPUTiDTM online engagement tool to get public feedback on the two concepts. Respondents will be able to provide targeted feedback on specific elements of each design to help inform the preferred concept. 4.6 REFINE PRELIMINARY DRAFT CONCEPTS Based on comments from city staff and partner organizations and the Park Board we will make final revisions to the two concepts plans and update the preliminary cost estimates. These two final conceptual plans and cost estimates will be included in the final park plan report to document the process and findings that will inform the development of a preferred preliminary concept and cost estimate. 4.7 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #6 City staff coordination meeting #6 will be used to review the final preliminary concepts and gather feedback on a single preferred concept. This meeting will also be used to provide project updates and prepare for next steps. 4.8 DEVELOP PREFERRED PRELIMINARY CONCEPT AND COST ESTIMATE Upon careful consideration of the input received on the two conceptual alternatives, our team will work with city staff to determine a preferred concept. This direction will be the basis of design for moving into final design. At the completion of this step, the city will have enough information to determine how far the budget will go and what can be included in final design. The deliverables for this step will consist of a preliminary engineering report and 30% cost estimate. 4.9 UPDATE MEMO #3 We will provide a third update memo to share project status and key findings from the preliminary concept design phase. Task 4 Meetings • Staff coordination meetings (2) • Park Board Meeting • Pop-up meetings (2) Task 4 Deliverables • Preliminary draft concepts and cost estimates (2) • Online engagement • Refined preliminary draft concepts • Preferred preliminary concept and cost estimate • Update Memo #3 TASK 5: CENTRAL PARK PLAN FINAL REPORT A final park plan report will be developed to document the planning effort for Central Park. This document will include a summary of input collected throughout the process, the two conceptual design alternatives, the refined, preferred alternative concept with cost estimate, and a memorandum summarizing public input not incorporated into the final conceptual design and justification for its exclusion. 5.1 DRAFT CENTRAL PARK PLAN REPORT A draft report will be prepared and distributed for city staff review. 5.2 CITY STAFF COORDINATION MEETING #7 City staff coordination meeting #7 will focus on any revisions to the draft plan required by staff in preparation for distribution of the draft plan to the Community Co-Designers. 5.3 FINAL CENTRAL PARK PLAN REPORT Working with city staff to incorporate feedback from the community co- designers on the draft report, we will finalize the Central Park Plan for Park Board approval. 5.4 PARK BOARD MEETING #2 Bolton & Menk will present the final Central Park Plan to the Hopkins Park CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 06SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I Board. As the Hopkins Park Board is not an approving body, the goal for this meeting would be for the Park Board to recommend the plan for approval by City Council. 5.5 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Following the Park Board meeting, Bolton & Menk will present the Central Park Plan to the Hopkins City Council for approval. This milestone will mark the end of Phase I; Planning and Preliminary Design for the project, ushering in final design. Task 5 Meetings • Staff coordination meeting • Park Board meeting • City Council meeting Task 5 Deliverables • Draft Central Park Plan Report • Final Central Park Plan Report TASK 6: PAVILION FEASIBILITY STUDY 6.1 PROJECT KICKOFF Our team will meet with staff and project representatives to outline project goals and objectives and define the expectations for the project. We will review in detail the overall proposed project workplan with your team and revise as necessary. Our team will collect and review any existing or new data that is pertinent to the project understanding, as well as tour existing facilities with city staff to better understand current community resources for the Pavilion. Lastly, we will discuss communication expectations that will be necessary day-to-day, as well as touchpoints with appropriate community leadership. 6.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE ANALYSIS The JLG team will assess the existing conditions of both the Pavilion and site. Our team consists of Erik Olson and Tom Betti who designed the last major addition and renovation to the Pavilion, giving us the experience and expertise to deliver a report that not only looks at the condition of the facility but also at the opportunities that exist for the future vision of the Pavilion 6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS We will utilize the skills and tools of Ballard*King to lead the market analysis portion of the data collection task of the work. The first step in the market analysis process will be working with your team to identify appropriate primary and secondary service areas. From these definitions, Ballard*King will be able to complete a full demographics analysis and alternative market analysis, exploring data associated with current market trends related to community access to indoor recreation opportunities. 6.4 SYNTHESIS AND SOLUTIONS DESIGN CONCEPTS Conceptual facility and site planning, based upon information gathered from the engagement process and market analysis, is an important step in developing community support and exploring potential facility options. Conceptual planning will illustrate potential approaches — creating options for recreation and art facilities, existing and potential future programs, accessible parking, etc., an provide additional information for development of facility operations and cost estimates. We will begin by holding a two- or three-day design charrette, and efficient and intensive workshop with project stakeholders and the community. Held online or on-site in Hopkins, the charrette will allow us to distill ideas within a relatively brief time. The following outlines the charrette process which would be refined with your input. Stakeholders and/or the public may be integrated into the charrette at your discretion. Should a virtual charrette be preferred, we suggest extending the timeline to three days. Day 1: Our team hosts a morning workshop session with project representatives and invited participants to discuss project goals and input received from community engagement activities. This is an opportunity to talk about the big picture — the vision of what community facilities could be and how they could impact the community. We then develop preliminary CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 07SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I facility and site options for review and discussion with key staff and stakeholders later that afternoon. Day 2: Based on feedback from the previous day, our team will revise the preliminary concept options and hold another workshop discussion to discuss revised options and gather more feedback. Day 3: Our team will again revise the concept options and hold a final workshop discussion. A public openhouse may be held, if desired, to present the result of the charrette to the community. After the charrette, the concept options developed during the charrette workshop will be further refined by the design team. Rough budget estimates for each will be prepared to assist the city and team in evaluating the options and selecting a preferred approach. 6.5 ZONING/REGULATORY REVIEW As design concepts are developed, the JLG team will vet the various options against the zoning and regulatory codes that are in place. The goal of this review process is to ensure that any concepts developed can meet the zoning regulations that are in effect and identify any variances that may be required. If so assess the chance of approval. We will engage the local zoning authorities in this process. 6.6 COST ESTIMATION/FUNDING ANALYSIS The design team will lean heavily on the construction manager to explore and vet the proposed conceptual solutions for the project and develop comprehensive project estimates for the proposed solution(s). Considering all things from construction, site work, furniture costs, design and legal fees, the comprehensive project estimates will serve as the targets for the city to budget and plan for a project in the long-term. During this phase, the entire team will work closely with the city and their financial team to brainstorm and discuss potential project funding mechanisms as the city looks to make a project a reality. 6.7 FINANCIAL/OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Utilizing the outcomes of the design concept exercise, Ballard*King will support the city in development of a proposed operational plan for the project. The plan will incorporate all items pertaining to a new facility including, operational hours, staffing, and service offerings. The plan will consider all necessary standards associated with the proposed facility. A final Pro Forma will be produced, highlighting operational expenditures and revenue and exploring potential pricing strategies. The JLG team will also support the city in identifying potential project partnerships and analyze opportunity/risk with various options, target desired program amenities and offerings, as well as pricing and operational strategies for a new facility. 6.8 REPORT AND PRESENTATIONS Our team will assemble all data, analysis, and recommendations in a comprehensive, user-friendly report. The report will document the study process — including a summary of the process and strategies for public involvement — as well as address market, operational costs, and potential project costs. The report can be used as a decision-making tool in moving the project forward. Prior to issuing the draft report, our team will prepare a preliminary copy for review and discussion with City staff and project representatives. This review allows for critical feedback and makes certain that the draft report responds to the study objectives as outlined at the project kick-off. After incorporating revisions extending from the draft report presentations, our team will submit and present the final study report to the City of Hopkins leadership. TASK 7: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & MEETINGS 7.1 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SURVEYS AND ENGAGEMENT SUMMARIES Online surveys will be distributed to gather specific input at strategic points in the project development process. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 08SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I Following each phase of engagement, an infographic-style report will be created summarizing that phase’s purpose, promotional tactics employed, feedback opportunities provided, number of comments received, key themes heard and how it will inform the next steps of the project process. This can be shared with the public at the end of each phase to close the feedback loop, providing transparency and building community trust throughout the process. 7.2 COMMUNITY POP-UP ENGAGEMENT MATERIALS To assist the city in outreach we will provide one round of materials for pop up engagement events featuring fun, attractive, and engaging activities. 7.3 PARTNER AGENCIES, COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS, AND KEY STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS We will coordinate and schedule meetings and offer presentations when necessary to the following groups: City of Minnetonka, Three Rivers Park District, Hopkins School District 270, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, local sports associations, and interest groups such as Access Hopkins, Active Kids Association of Sport, Hopkins High School Hockey and Soccer teams, Hopkins Youth Hockey Association, Hopkins Youth Lacrosse Association, Hopkins Rugby, Turf Tots, Tonka United Soccer Association, and other core groups as identified through the engagement process. While the community wide engagement plan unfolds, other unorganized key interest groups such as students or bicyclists may also be identified where a focus group could be organized. Bolton & Menk, and/or Barr Engineering, will plan to facilitate and attend two meetings with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) for purposes of confirming anticipated approvals of regulatory requirements and gauging potential for cost-participation on certain elements of the project. Should a Nine Mile Creek Headwaters or flood mitigation solution be realized, these meetings will be crucial to garnering NMCWD support for direct funding and/or support for other funding programs. We anticipate up to 10 agency, community, and other stakeholder engagement meetings. 7.4 YOUTH-FOCUSED ENGAGEMENT We will work with city staff to provide materials for youth-focused engagement to be conducted by the city, such as a “Design Your Own Playground” challenge where students have an opportunity to share what their dream park vision is. 7.5 CITY OFFICIALS MEETINGS + UPDATE MEMOS The Bolton & Menk team will prepare presentation materials for two Park Board meetings, one City Council meeting, and one joint Park Board/City Council workshop. We will also provide 3 update memos throughout the process to help keep council and park board members informed on project progress. TASK 10: ADD ALTERNATIVES The scope included as our team’s baseline services generally represents our proposed scope of work intended to meet the requirements of the RFP, including innovative community engagement measures to achieve the high- quality performance desired by the city. The following add alternatives are recommended additions to the recommended additions to the scope that we have separated out in the event it eases ‘apples to apples’ comparison of our baseline scope/fee to that of competing proposals. Each of the following add alternatives are proposed ala carte for city determination regarding their inclusion. 10.1 GEOTECHNICAL SOIL INVESTIGATION - ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING AND OVERSIGHT As part of our team’s baseline services, Braun Intertec will collect soil borings at the Pavilion site and Central Park. The baseline data collected will help guide foundation considerations in terms of soil strength properties and highlight limits of what may generally be classified as ‘garbage’ or regulated fill. However, the baseline scope does not go so far as to quantify and qualify the specific regulated chemical constituents of the soil that will be needed if historic landfill soils are to be remediated to some degree. This add alternative task seeks to identify more specifically the soil constituents the city will be faced with, which can help quantify the costs associated with encountering or disposing of such material, and in turn better inform project scoping decisions and strategies to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the site soils. CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 09SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit 1 Soil Screening Soil samples from the soil borings will be visually and manually classified in the field by an environmental technician using ASTM D2488 “Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual- Manual Procedures).” Field personnel will examine soil samples for unusual staining, odors, and other apparent signs of contamination. In addition, the soil samples will be screened for the presence of organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID). The PID will be equipped with a 10.6-electron-volt lamp and calibrated to an isobutylene standard. The PID will be used to perform a headspace method of field analysis as recommended by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and in accordance with Braun Intertec Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Soil Sampling, Analytical Testing, & Reporting Soil samples will be collected from the soil borings for laboratory analysis in accordance with Braun Intertec SOPs. Soil samples will be collected from depth intervals in the unsaturated zone where indications of contamination are observed in the field. If no indications of contamination are observed, the soil samples will be collected from depths most likely to be impacted based on the potential contaminant source. The budget for this task assumes that up to 12 soil samples will be submitted to Pace Analytical Servies (Pace) of Minneapolis and analyzed for a combination of the following parameters: • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260 • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270 • Diesel range organics (DRO) using the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Method • Eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals using EPA Methods 6010 and 7471 Braun will also conduct six vapor probes with VOC and Methane analysis on the site soils, recognizing historic landfill uses. Upon completion of the on-site work and receipt of laboratory analytical results, a report will be prepared detailing the methods, results, and conclusions/recommendations. SCOPE OF WORK NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSAL, BUT AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST AS PART OF FUTURE PROPOSAL GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS: RESPONSE ACTION PLAN AND ESTABLISH DETAILED LIMITS OF REGULATED SOILS A response action plan (RAP) or other soil remediation steps following receipt of analytical soil testing results are not included in our proposed scope of services at this time, but can be developed and submitted for consideration by the city once the site layout and soil specifics are better delineated. GRANT APPLICATIONS & ADMINISTRATION This project can be scoped through the park planning phase to include improvements attractive for partnerships with and grants from other agencies. Example funding sources include: • Potential funding from project partners; The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has authorized up to $50,000 for feasibility analysis of stormwater and flood management improvements as part of the Hopkins Central Park Plan development; depending on the partnership agreement, we anticipate this funding could cover the bulk of our teammate Barr Engineering’s efforts during our Phase I preliminary design; depending on outcomes of preliminary design, additional funding may be available through project partnerships for final design and construction • We recommend the city pursue funding from Hennepin County through the MN Brownfields Gap Financing Program for the environmental analysis of the borings; the program may fund up to $15,000 toward efforts identified in this proposal • MnDNR Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Program; this program funds publicly-owned capital improvements, including the engineering and construction of flood storage structures and other related activities • MPCA Climate Resiliency grants; the 2023 legislature invested $100 million to fund climate change adaptation and resiliency, including funding CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 10SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I to implement climate resilient projects such as flood storage in Central Park • Hennepin County also has a variety of funding sources related to community parks, community development, and site cleanup that may be appropriate resources following our preliminary design efforts • MN Legislative Funding (Bonding Bill); we understand the city does not intend to pursue these funds at this time, but it may be beneficial to revisit this idea should the project scope expand to large scale regulated remediation of historic regional landfill remnants • MnDNR Outdoor Recreation Grant Program; this funding at a 1:1 match can be used to fund a variety of park improvements for cities; with limited strings tied to the funding and recognizing the goals of this project, we anticipate Hopkins’ Central Park will be a good candidate to apply for this money; the Bolton & Menk team has been successful in securing and implementing projects with this funding routinely • Depending on the investigations completed and results of analytical soil testing, the site may be eligible for funding sources related to landfill and/ or petroleum cleanup; the Bolton & Menk team, with partners in Braun Intertec and Barr Engineering, are best positioned to identify and navigate these opportunities in response to a wide variety of possible outcomes CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 11SCOPE OF SERVICES Exhibit I TASK Phase I Planning + Preliminary Design S O N D J F M A M J J A S Task One: Project Initiation 1.1 Schedule of Work Tasks 1.2 City Staff Coordination Meeting #1 (Engagement 7.1) Task Two: Data Collection 2.1 Topographic + Boundary Survey 2.2 Geotechnical Evaluation 2.3 Review of Previous Planning Efforts 2.4 Online Public Engagement (Engagement 7.1) 2.5 City Staff Coordination Meeting #2 2.6 Update Memo #1 (Engagement 7.5) Task Three: Central Park Needs Assessment + Analysis 3.1 Site Tour 3.2 Preliminary Issues + Opportunities Diagram 3.3 Pop-Ups + Youth Engagement Support (Engagement 7.2 + 7.4) 3.4 Partner Agencies, Community Organizations + Key Stakeholder Meetings (Engagement 7.3) 3.5 City Staff Coordination Meeting #3 3.6 Identify Opportunities To Improve Ecology + Wildlife Habitat 3.7 Determine BMPs to Meet NMCWD Requirements 3.8 Determine BMP Opportunities That Are "Above And Beyond" 3.9 Determine Feasibility + Benefits Of Floodwater Storage In Central Park 3.10 Determine Feasibility Of Integrating NMC Headwaters 3.11 Needs Assessement + Analysis Summary 3.12 City Staff Coordination Meeting #4 3.13 Update Memo #2 (Engagement 7.5) SEE NEXT PAGE TASK 1 TASK 2 TASK 3 TASK 4 City Staff Coordination Meeting Public Engagement Meeting Update Memo Key Project Deliverable PROJECT TIMELINE CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINS 12PROjECt tImElInE Exhibit 1 TASK S O N D J F M A Task Four: Preliminary Concept Design 4.1 Preliminary Draft Concepts 4.2 City Staff Coordinaton Meeting #5 4.3 Park Board Meeting #1 (Engagement 7.5) 4.4 Park Board / City Council Workshop (Engagement 7.5) 4.5 Online Engagement (Engagement 7.2) 4.6 Refine Preliminary Draft Concept 4.7 City Staff Coordinaton Meeting #6 (Engagement 7.8) 4.8 Develop Preferred Preliminary Concept + Cost Estimate 4.9 Update Memo #3 Task Five: Central Park Plan Final Report 5.1 Draft Central Park Plan Report 5.2 City Staff Coordination Meeting #7 5.3 Final Central Park Plan Report 5.4 Park Board Meeting #2 (Engagement 7.8) 5.5 City Council Meeting (Engagement 7.8) Task Six: Pavilion Expansion Feasibility Study 6.1 Project Kick Off 6.2 Existing Conditions / Site Analysis 6.3 Market Analysis 6.4 Community Engagement 6.5 Design Concepts 6.6 Zoning / Regulatory Review 6.7 Cost Estimate / Funding Analysis 6.8 Financial / Operations Analysis 6.9 Draft Report 6.10 Final Report + Presentations Phase I Planning + Preliminary Design TASK 4 TASK 6 TASK 6 TASK 5 City Staff Coordination Meeting Public Engagement Meeting Update Memo Key Project Deliverable CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN & PAVILION EXPANSION FEASIBILITY STUDY | CITY OF HOPKINSPROjECt tImElInE 13 Exhibit I The Bolton & Menk team will provide the Phase 1 scope of services as described for an hourly based, not-to-exceed fee of $269,031. Add-alternative tasks are estimated to be $22,693, which relates to analytical soil testing. Please find our detailed cost proposal, containing hours and rates for key staff, below. We will bill work following our standard hourly billing rates and will not exceed our estimate without prior authorization from the city. The estimated fee includes labor, general business, and other normal and customary expenses associated with operating a professional business. Unless otherwise noted, the fees include vehicle and personal expenses, mileage, telephone, survey stakes, and routine expendable supplies; no separate charges will be made for these activities and materials. Expenses beyond the agreed scope of services and nonroutine expenses, such as large quantities of prints, extra report copies, outsourced graphics and photographic reproductions, document recording fees, outside professional and technical assistance, and other items of this general nature will be invoiced separately. Client: City of Hopkins Braun  Intertec JLG  Architects Ballard*Kin g Project: Central Park Improvements & Pavilion Expansion Feasibility Task No.Work Task Description Principal‐in‐ChargeProject ManagerSenior Landscape ArchitectLandscape DesignerPrincipal Landscape ArchitectSite Civil EngineerLandscape DesignerSenior Urban Planner & Engagement AdvisorCommunity LiaisonProject Communication SpecialistSurvey ManagerSurvey TechnicianSurvey Crew ChiefClericalSenior Landscape Architect/Barr Project ManagerSenior Landscape Architect/DesignerPrincipal EngineerSenior Engineer (Civil, Water Resources, Environmental)Water Resources EngineerTotal  Hours  (BMI &  Barr Key  Staff)Braun IntertecJLG ArchitectsBallard*KingTotal  Cost 1.0 Project Initiation 2 5 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 22 ‐$           ‐$              ‐$            $3,878 2.0 Data Collection 2 6 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 12 24 88 0 2 1 1 0 0 147 20,330$     ‐$              ‐$            $46,487 3.0 Central Park Needs Assessment & Analysis 4 27 10 23 1 24 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 14 39 110 112 418 ‐$           ‐$              ‐$            $65,415 4.0 Preliminary Concept Design 13 24 34 32 0 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 56 10 50 0 293 ‐$           ‐$              ‐$            $45,879 5.0 Central Park Plan Final Report 5 11 6 16 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 1 4 0 58 ‐$           ‐$              ‐$            $8,915 6.0 Pavilion Expansion Feasibility 7 8 2 1 0 000000000 6 3 2 1 232 ‐$           39,400$      21,500$     $66,392 7.0 Community Engagement & Meetings 16 37 8 6 0 0 21 14 32 70 0 0 0 0 6 3 2 0 0 215 ‐$           ‐$              ‐$            $32,065 $269,031 Total Hours 71 164 235 308 49 222 79 15 33 70 12 24 88 38 164 227 73 343 138 2353 20,330$     39,400$      21,500$      Average Hourly Rate $211 $162 $161 $122 $220 $159 $125 $176 $128 $138 $201 $141 $189 $106 $160 $150 $210 $165 $140 Subtotal $14,981 $26,568 $37,835 $37,576 $10,780 $35,298 $9,875 $2,640 $4,224 $9,660 $2,412 $3,384 $16,632 $4,028 $26,240 $34,050 $15,330 $56,595 $19,320 20,330$     39,400$      21,500$      10.0 Optional, Add Alternatives 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,525$     ‐$              ‐$            $22,693 $291,724 Detailed Cost Estimate Total, Hourly Not‐to‐Exceed Fee (Phase 1 + Add Alternative) Subtotal: Phase 1 (Planning + Preliminary Design) Bolton & Menk, Inc.Barr Project Name City of XXX, Minnesota Section X ‐ Page X FEES 14 Exhibit II AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com August 1, 2024 Revised Proposal QTB200689 Mike Waltman, PE Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337 Re: Revised Proposal for a Geotechnical Evaluation and Phase I ESA Hopkins Central Park and Pavilion Expansion 11000 Excelsior Boulevard Hopkins, Minnesota Dear Mr. Waltman: Braun Intertec Corporation appreciates the opportunity to submit this revised proposal to complete a geotechnical evaluation and Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the Hopkins Central Park and Pavilion Expansion project in Hopkins, Minnesota. Project Information We understand the City of Hopkins is looking at the feasibility of an expansion to the Hopkins Pavilion and site renovation of Central Park. The proposed Pavilion Expansion is assumed to be a slab-on-grade facility with one story above (using conventional foundations and steel framing) along with site improvements for Central Park to include a new soccer field, new volleyball courts, additional pickleball courts, and new proposed shade structures. Previous Experience, Geotechnical and Environmental Information We have completed previous projects in the area with Bolton & Menk, Inc. (BMI), in collaboration with City of Hopkins dating back to 1968. Recently, we completed a pavement evaluation in 2014 for BMI as well and an environmental screening report in 2015 for the Central Park parking lot on the northwest corner of the park for BMI. Our work with City of Hopkins and BMI has helped us understand the current site conditions and construction challenges associated with the proposed work. We understand Central Park was built on an old landfill between 1962 and 1964. Our exploration work from 1968 indicated environmental impacts from the landfill including ‘dump debris’, wood, glass, rubber, paper, tin, etc. Our 2015 environmental work took place in the Central Park parking lot in the northwest corner of the site, where we performed screening and sampling to typify soil removed for the project for offsite disposal. During our oversight of the excavations, we observed excavated debris that we identified as concrete, asphalt, glass bottles, wood, rebar, coal and miscellaneous garbage. Petroleum odors were also noted. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 2 Base RFP Scope – Geotechnical & Environmental Scope Our base scope will utilize previous pavement borings for the new proposed pavement work and will also incorporate 9 new soil borings for the preliminary Pavilion Expansion and Central Park site improvements. Geotechnical Scope of Services We propose the following tasks to help achieve the stated purpose. If we encounter unfavorable or unforeseen conditions during the completion of our tasks that lead us to recommend an expanded scope of services, we will contact you to discuss the conditions before resuming our services. Purpose The purpose of our geotechnical evaluation will be to characterize subsurface geologic conditions at selected exploration locations, evaluate their impact on the project, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the design and construction of pavements, central park site improvements and preliminary design information for the Pavilion Expansion. Site Access Based on aerial photographs, it appears that the site will require an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) drill rig equipped with hollow stem auger. We assume there will be no cause for delays in accessing the exploration locations. We are not including tree clearing, debris or obstruction removal, grading of navigable paths, or snow plowing. Depending on access requirements, ground conditions or potential utility conflicts, our field crew may alter the exploration locations from those proposed to facilitate accessibility. Our drilling activities may also impact the vegetation and may rut the surface to access boring locations. Restoration of vegetation and turf is not part of our scope of services. Staking We will stake prospective subsurface exploration locations and obtain surface elevations at those locations using GPS (Global Positioning System) technology. For purposes of linking the GPS data to an appropriate reference, we request that you provide CAD files indicating location/elevation references appropriate for this project, or give us contact information for the consultant that might have such information. Utility Clearance Prior to drilling or excavating, we will contact Gopher State One Call and arrange for notification of the appropriate utility vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities. You, or your authorized representative, are responsible to notify us before we begin our work of the presence and location of any underground objects or private utilities that are not the responsibility of public agencies. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 3 In addition, our fees include a budget to retain a private locate company to mark private utilities that are not the responsibility of public agencies. Upon our request, the property owner must also be available to assist the private locate company in determining the presence of any underground objects or the location of utilities. We will not be liable for any damages resulting from unidentified or misidentified underground objects or utilities. Further, we reserve the right to stop work if underground objects or utilities are suspected or known to exist, but locations cannot be accurately determined. Soil Borings We propose to drill nine (9) standard penetration test (SPT) borings to nominal depths of 15 to 25 feet below existing grade for the project. We will perform standard penetration tests at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to a depth of about 15 feet, and at 5-foot intervals at greater depths. For areas of pavement construction, we intend to utilize previous boring information collected in 2014. Figure 1 depicts our proposed boring locations for the Pavilion Expansion and Central Park site improvements. Figure 1. Proposed Boring Locations Figure collected through City of Hopkins ‘Parks Concept Boards’ dated May 15, 2023. Proposed Boring Locations Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 4 If the intended boring depths do not extend through unsuitable material, we will extend the borings at least 5 feet into suitable material at greater depths. The additional information will help evaluate such issues as excavation depth, consolidation settlement, and foundation alternatives, among others. If we identify a need for deeper (or additional) borings, we will contact you prior to increasing our total estimated drilled footage and submit a Change Order summarizing the anticipated additional effort and the associated cost, for your review and authorization. Groundwater Measurements If the borings encounter groundwater during or immediately after drilling of each boring, we will record the observed depth on the boring logs. MDH Sealing Record We are planning the deepest borings to be at least 15 feet and less than 25 feet. Therefore, the Minnesota Statutes require us to complete a Sealing Record after our completion of the borings. Our proposal includes the fees for the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Sealing Record. In the event we extend our borings to a depth of 25 feet or greater, the MDH requires us to complete and submit a Sealing Notification Form for the project. The submission of the Sealing Notification Form will require a signature from the property owner (or agent). If we extend our borings to a depth of 25 feet or greater, we will forward on to you a copy of the form for signature and increase our total fees by $100. Borehole Abandonment We will backfill our exploration locations immediately after completing the drilling at each location. Minnesota Statutes require sealing temporary borings that are 15 feet deep or deeper. Based on our proposed subsurface characterization depths, we will seal 75 linear feet of borehole with grout. Our lump sum fee includes those fees associated with the sealing. Sealing boreholes with grout will prevent us from disposing of auger boring cuttings in the completed boreholes. Unless you direct us otherwise, we intend to thin-spread the cuttings around the boreholes. Over time, subsidence of borehole backfill may occur, requiring releveling of surface grades or replacing bituminous or concrete patches. We are not assuming responsibility for re-leveling or re-patching after we complete our fieldwork. Sample Review and Laboratory Testing We will return recovered samples to our laboratory, where a geotechnical engineer will visually classify and log them. To help classify the materials encountered and estimate the engineering properties necessary to our analyses, we have budgeted to perform the following laboratory tests. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 5 Table 1. Laboratory Tests Test Name ASTM Test Method Purpose Moisture content D2216 Soil classification, moisture condition, and engineering properties Percent passing #200 sieve D1140 Soil classification, and evaluate frost susceptibility Organic content D2974 Evaluate suitability of soils for reuse We will determine the actual laboratory testing for the project depending on the encountered subsurface conditions. If we identify a laboratory testing program that exceeds the budget included in this proposal but provides additional value to the project, we will request authorization for the additional fees through a Change Order. Engineering Analyses We will use data obtained from the subsurface exploration and laboratory tests to evaluate the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions, and to perform engineering analyses related to structure and pavement design and performance. Report We will prepare a report including:  A sketch showing the exploration locations.  Logs of the borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of our groundwater measurements and laboratory tests.  A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions.  Discussion identifying the subsurface conditions that will impact design and construction.  Discussion regarding the reuse of on-site materials during construction.  Recommendations for preparing structure and pavement subgrades, and the selection, placement and compaction of fill.  Preliminary recommendations for design and construction of the proposed pavilion addition. We will only submit an electronic copy of our report to you unless you request otherwise. At your request, we can also send the report to additional project team members. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 6 Schedule We anticipate performing our work according to the following schedule.  Drill Rig Mobilization – Scheduled for September 16th and 17th, provided we receive written authorization by no later than August 26th, 2024.  Field Exploration – 2 days on site to complete the soil borings.  Classification and Laboratory Testing – Within 1 week after completion of field exploration.  Preliminary Results – Within 1 week after completion of field exploration.  Draft Report Submittal – Within about 3 weeks after completion of field exploration.  Final Report Submittal – Within 5 days of receiving comments on the draft report and depending on the complexity of the comments. If we cannot complete our proposed scope of services according to this schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, we may need to revise this proposal prior to completing the remaining tasks. Environmental Scope of Services Environmental Task 1 – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Braun Intertec will conduct a Phase I ESA of the Site in accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) Practice E1527-21 and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 312, which is the recognized industry standard defining good commercial and customary practice for conducting all appropriate inquiry (AAI) into the previous ownership and uses of the Site consistent with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The intent of this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability. The purpose of the Phase I ESA will be to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. The Phase I ESA will include a government and historical records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, and data evaluation. The results of the Phase I ESA will be summarized in a written report. So that they may be identified within the report, the user must supply the names of all parties intending to rely on the executed service and subsequent report. Additional reliance may be obtained at the discretion of Braun Intertec. In order to satisfy the requirements of AAI, the user bears specific responsibilities for satisfying certain components of the environmental inquiry. The E1527-21 Practice provides a User Questionnaire which outlines the information that the user must provide (if available) to the Environmental Professional. The User Questionnaire, attached to this proposal, should be completed and returned to Braun Intertec so that the information can be included in the report. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 7 The results of the Phase I ESA will be summarized in a written report documenting information sources used, findings and conclusions, and the professional opinion of Braun Intertec regarding the impact of any potential environmental concerns in connection with the Site. Appendices to the report will include copies of available historical information (e.g., fire insurance maps, aerial photographs, etc.). A draft copy of the Phase I ESA will be issued electronically for review and comment. Upon receipt of comments, Braun Intertec will issue the final Phase I ESA report. Only an electronic copy of the Phase I ESA report will be submitted to you unless you request otherwise. Optional Alternative Scope – Environmental Services As noted in our base scope section, we understand that Central Park was previously a landfill site. Given the site history, we have provided an optional services to perform environmental work to identify specific environmental concerns regarding the existing in-place material. Environmental Task 2 – Environmental Oversight of Geotechnical Soil Borings Soil Screening Soil samples from the soil borings will be visually and manually classified in the field by an environmental technician using ASTM D2488 “Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual- Manual Procedures).” Field personnel will examine soil samples for unusual staining, odors, and other apparent signs of contamination. In addition, the soil samples will be screened for the presence of organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID). The PID will be equipped with a 10.6-electron-volt lamp and calibrated to an isobutylene standard. The PID will be used to perform a headspace method of field analysis as recommended by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and in accordance with Braun Intertec Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Soil Sampling and Analytical Testing Soil samples will be collected from the soil borings for laboratory analysis in accordance with Braun Intertec SOPs. Soil samples will be collected from depth intervals in the unsaturated zone where indications of contamination are observed in the field. If no indications of contamination are observed, the soil samples will be collected from depths most likely to be impacted based on the potential contaminant source. The budget for this task assumes that up to 12 soil samples will be submitted to Pace Analytical Servies (Pace) of Minneapolis, Minnesota and analyzed for a combination of the following parameters:  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using EPA Method 8270.  Diesel range organics (DRO) using the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Method.  Eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals using EPA Methods 6010 and 7471. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 8 Reporting Verbal results of the environmental monitoring will be provided to you as they become available. Upon completion of the on-Site work and receipt of laboratory analytical results, a report will be prepared detailing the methods, results, and conclusions/recommendations. A draft copy of the report will be forwarded to you prior to report finalization. Only an electronic copy of the Braun Intertec environmental monitoring report will be submitted to you unless you request otherwise. Environmental Task 3 – Environmental Cleanup Grant Application Assistance Braun Intertec will assist Bolton & Menk, Inc. in determining which environmental cleanup grants may be available for this project. The grant sources that will be explored will include DEED, Met Council, and Hennepin County. Environmental Task 4 – Soil Vapor Assessment Objective of Soil Vapor Assessment The objective of the soil vapor assessment is to evaluate the Site for potential soil vapor intrusion risks to the existing and proposed structures at the Site. The proposed soil vapor assessment includes six soil vapor samples to be collected from the vicinity of those existing and proposed structures. Soil Vapor Sampling and Analytical Testing Six soil vapor probes will be advanced on the Site using a hydraulically-driven push-probe rig to a depth of 5 feet bgs and then retracted to a depth of 3 feet bgs. New, inert tubing will be attached to the top of the downhole sampler and the sampling point and tubing will be purged with a hand pump to remove two volumes of air prior to sample collection. Following purging, organic vapor concentrations will be screened with a PID and the value recorded. The soil vapor samples will then be collected using laboratory-supplied negative pressure air-sample collection canisters (6-liter or 1-liter canisters) equipped with 200 milliliter per minute (mL/min) flow restrictors in accordance with the MPCA guidelines and in accordance will Braun Intertec SOPs. Following sample collection, the temporary sampling point will be removed from the borehole and the borehole will be sealed in accordance with MDH guidelines. The soil vapor samples will be submitted to Pace National of Mount Juliet, Tennessee and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method TO 15. Reporting Verbal results of the soil vapor sampling will be provided to you as they become available. Upon completion of the on-Site work and receipt of laboratory analytical results, the methods, results, and conclusions/recommendations will be included in the report also documenting the environmental oversight of the geotechnical soil borings detailed above. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 9 Fees We will furnish the services described in this proposal for a lump sum fee of $20,330. Table 2 provides a breakdown of the proposed fees for the base RFP scope. If the optional scope is selected, we will furnish the services described in this proposal for a lump sum fee of $21,525. Table 3 provides costs for the optional scope. Table 2. Proposed Fee Breakdown Service Fee Geotechnical Scope Staking and Utility Coordination $1,570 Subcontracted – Private Utility Locator 300 Drilling 8,865 Laboratory Testing 1,750 Engineering & Reporting $4,860 Geotechnical Subtotal $17,345 Environmental Scope Task 1 – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment $2,985 Environmental Subtotal $2,985 Project Total $20,330 Table 3. Proposed Fee Breakdown for Optional Scope Add Service Fee Environmental Scope Task 2 – Environmental Oversight of Geotechnical Soil Borings $12,995 Task 3 – Environmental Cleanup Grant Application Assistance 1,080 Task 4 – Soil Vapor Assessment 7,450 Optional Environmental Scope Total $21,525 Our work may extend over several invoicing periods. As such, we will submit partial progress invoices for work we perform during each invoicing period. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 10 General Remarks We will be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further and clarify the various scope components. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. Please sign and return a copy to us in its entirety. We based the proposed fee on the scope of services described and the assumptions that you will authorize our services within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. Bolton & Menk, Inc. Revised Proposal QTB200689 August 1, 2024 Page 11 Our services will be provided under the terms of the Subconsultant Master Agreement for Professional Services dated January 1, 2021. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project further, please Zach Semlak at 651.788.5071 (zsemlak@braunintertec.com) for geotechnical related questions or Jeff Arndt at 952.995.2433 (jarndt@braunintertec.com), for environmental related questions. Sincerely, BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Zachary T. Semlak Staff Engineer Jeffrey A. Arndt, PG Project Scientist Imants Pone Manager, Senior Scientist Joshua L. Kirk, PE Director, Senior Engineer Attachment: ASTM Practice E1527-21 User Questionnaire The revised proposal is accepted, and you are authorized to proceed. Authorizer’s Firm Authorizer’s Signature Authorizer’s Name (please print or type) Authorizer’s Title Date AA/EOE Braun Intertec Corporation 11001 Hampshire Avenue S Minneapolis, MN 55438 Phone: 952.995.2000 Fax: 952.995.2020 Web: braunintertec.com ASTM Practice E1527-21 User Questionnaire Site: Hopkins Central Park and Pavilion Expansion 11000 Excelsior Boulevard Hopkins, Minnesota Name: Date: Company: In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002 (the “Brownfields Amendment”), the User must conduct the following inquiries. The User should provide the following information to the environmental professional. Failure to conduct these inquiries could result in a determination that “all appropriate inquiries” is not complete. (1)Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the property. The types of title reports that may disclose environmental liens include Preliminary Title Reports, Title Commitments, Condition of Title, and Title Abstracts. Chain-of-title reports will not normally disclose environmental liens. Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any environmental cleanup liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? (2)Activity and use limitations (AULs) that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property. The types of title reports that may disclose AULs include Preliminary Title Reports, Title Commitments, Condition of Title, and Title Abstracts. Chain-of-title reports will not normally disclose AULs. Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? (3)Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP. Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? Bolton & Menk, Inc. Proposal QTB200689 July 31, 2024 Page 2 (4)Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated. Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? (5)Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property. Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example, (a)Do you know the past uses of the property? If so, please explain. (b)Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? If so, please explain. (c)Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? If so, please explain. (d)Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? If so, please explain. (6)The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? If so, please explain.