Memo Entertainment Complex Project
, \
CITY OF HOPKINS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 27, 1993
TO: Honorable Mayor and city council
FROM:~{Jim Kerrigan, Director, Planning & Economic Development
SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX PROJECT
------------------------------
Purpose of Report
In conjunction with the proposed Entertainment Complex Project
for the Suburban Chevrolet site city staff has been discussing
with Copeland-Mithun, Child's Play Theatre and Minnetonka Dance
Theater issues that will need to be identified within the various
agreements that will be executed in order to facilitate this
project.
The purpose of scheduling this item on the June 1 agenda is to
discuss these various agreements and their proposed terms and
timelines established and provide direction to the staff as to
how the Council desires to proceed with this project. The
development agreement as currently drafted contains an aggressive
schedule as related to moving on the project. Staff is
interested in how the Council feels about the timelines. At this
meeting the Council is not being asked to specifically undertake
any action on this item.
As you are aware, at the most recent meeting with the city
Council on this project a variety of major issues as relates to
the performing arts facility were discussed. These included the
following topics:
0 Potential size of the facility
0 Cost consideration
0 Ownership - public versus private
Based on this discussion there was a general understanding as
relates to the following:
0 Child's Play Theatre would need a facility of between
17,000 and 18,000 square feet. If Minnetonka Dance
Company is to be accommodated an additional
.
Honorable Mayor and city council
May 27, 1993
Page 2
approximately 4,000 square feet would need to be added
to the facility. The general consensUs from the
Council seemed to be that staff should continue at this
time to look at a large enough facility that would
accommodate both Child's Play Theatre and Minnetonka
Dance Company.
0 The public cost to build a performing arts facility
would range between approximately $1.6 million for a
17,000 square foot facility to $1.9 million for a
22,000 square foot facility if it was publicly owned.
Under private ownership the range would be between
approximately $2.4 million and $2.9 million. The
Council in its discussion felt that the project should
continue to be pursued even though costs are higher
than originally anticipated.
0 The facility could be either publicly or privately
owned. However, there appears to be a strong cost
benefit in having the facility publicly owned. Because
of property tax payments, developer profits, and the
cost for a developer to borrow money, private ownership
could increase the overall project cost by at least $1
million. As a result of the recent Council discussion
there seems to be a consensus that public ownership may
be the most appropriate effort to pursue.
Proposed Agreements
Based on the assumption that the performing arts facility would
be publicly owned, the following two agreements would need to be
executed prior to proceeding any further with the project.
0 Development agreement between the Hopkins HRA and
Copeland-Mithun
0 Agreement to lease between the Hopkins HRA and Child's
Play Theatre.
The timetable as detailed for completing the various tasks is
very aggressive and may have to be revised as the process
proceeds. However, staff feel tasks need to be completed in an
expedient manner if this project is to be completed by the fall
of 1994.
Development Agreement - Copeland-Mithun
Based on this assumption the Performing Arts Center would be
publicly owned, the development agreement with Copeland-Mithun
would detail the requirements they would have to meet in
conjunction with construction of the restaurant/movie theater
.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 27, 1993
Page 3
portion of the entertainment project. The main points that are
being considered for this agreement include the following:
0 within 14 days of execution of the agreement both
parties would begin to negotiate an acceptable
agreement whereby Copeland-Mithun would provide
architectural services for the performing arts portion
of the project. The development agreement would detail
basic parameters on how the fee for this service would
be established and an understanding that if an
acceptable contract could not be worked out with
Copeland the HRA would have the ability to solicit
proposals and a new contract with another firm for
providing such services.
0 within 45 days of the date of the agreement the
developer would be required to provide the following:
- A preliminary site plan
- A preliminary project pro-forma
- An application for concept review
- A preliminary project time table
- Preliminary letters of commitment from prospective
tenants
0 Within 60 days the developer would be required to
provide design schematic plans of the project.
0 within 90 days from the date of execution the developer
would be required to submit the following:
- Application for conditional use permit and
subdivision of the property
- Letters of commitment from tenants for at least 50
percent of the project space
- Final financial pro-forma
0 Within 180 days from the date of the agreement the
developer will be required to provide the following:
- Final financing commitment
- Binding letters of commitment for 100% of the
space
- Submission of construction plans
. .
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 27, 1993
Page 4
0 Closing on purchase of the property would be completed
at such time as the following was completed:
- Submission of all of the information as required
by the development agreement as detailed above
- All necessary approvals by the city and other
governmental agencies had been received
- Developer had secured a Letter of Credit. This
Letter of Credit would be based on the cost the
HRA would experience for the portion of property
that would be utilized by the developer for
construction of the restaurant/movie theater
facility proposed project.
- At the time of closing the developer would take
ownership of that portion of the Suburban
Chevrolet properties which would be used for the
theater/restaurant project. The HRA or City would
take ownership of the portion of the property to
be used for the performing arts facility.
- The developer would be required to enter into an
assessment agreement for a minimum market value
for the completed project.
The Council/HRA needs to be aware of the following as relates to
the proposed agreement with Copeland-Mithun:
0 The option agreement with the owners of Suburban
Chevrolet require that there be a closing by no later
than March 15. Based on the schedule for completing
the various tasks within the agreement this should be
attainable provided the development agreement is
executed sometime within the reasonably near future.
0 The current draft of the development agreement does not
make performance under the agreement contingent upon
the performing arts facility proceeding. If the
agreement was executed and the developer met all of the
conditions of the agreement, even if a decision was
made by the HRA to not proceed with the performing arts
facility, there would still be an obligation for the
City/HRA to provide Copeland-Mithun with land for their
portion of the overall project.
Development Agreement - Child's Play Theatre
Based on the premise that the performing arts facility would be
publicly owned, an agreement is also proposed to be executed with
.
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 27, 1993
Page 5
Child's Play Theatre. This agreement basically states that if
various requirements were met by both parties, the City/HRA would
agree to execute a lease with child's Play Theatre Company (CPTC)
for use of the performing arts facility. This agreement to lease
document would basically detail the following:
0 Within 14 days from execution of the agreement the HRA
would undertake the process of hiring a project manager
and an architect.
0 Within 60 days from the date of the agreement the
Authority would furnish to CPTC schematic design
drawings for the performing arts facility. They shall
then have the ability to review these documents and
provide their comments. The sole discretion on
revising the plans at this stage shall be with the HRA.
If agreement cannot be resolved between CPTC and the
Authority as relates to the design of the facility the
agreement to lease could be terminated at this time.
It would probably be appropriate at this time to
determine, based on cost and design considerations,
whether or not as part of the detailed design/
construction planning preparation stage to include
space in the proposed facility for Minnetonka Dance
Theater.
0 Within 180 days from the date of the agreement the
Authority will furnish CPTC with construction plans for
the performing arts facility. CPTC again will have the
ability to review these documents to provide their
comments. However, it will be the sole discretion of
the HRA as to whether and how the plans are revised
based on these comments and either party shall have the
ability to terminate the agreement.
0 A threshold for cost of construction of this facility
shall be established in this agreement. Based on all
construction and soft costs (architectural,
engineering, environmental, legal, etc.) this
is being
discussed at the following limits:
- 17,000 square feet $1,630,000
- 18,000 square feet $1,680,000
- 21,000 square feet $1,860,000
- 22,000 square feet $1,920,000
If based upon bids received it is determined that the
cost of the facility, exclusive of any financial
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 27, 1993
Page 6
participation by CPTC or other tenants, would exceed
these limits the Authority will have the ability to
terminate the agreement to lease with CPTC.
0 The Authority shall have the ability to terminate the
agreement with CPTC if there are events of default
existing as relates to the agreement with Copeland-
Mithun that prevent them from proceeding with their
project or the City/HRA has not closed on the purchase
of the Suburban Chevrolet property by March 15.
- If there are events of default taking place by
either party
0 within 90 days of the date of the agreement CPTC will
have to secure $200,000 in pledges for the leasehold
improvements which will be undertaken within 180 days
from the date of the agreement. They will be required
to have secured the total $350,000 to complete all of
their leasehold improvements at the time of closing.
Provided there was no default by either party as relates to the
agreement to lease and all of the required information is
provided and determined acceptable by both parties in accordance
with the agreement, the HRA would be obligated to enter into a
lease agreement with Child's Play Theatre. Presently the terms
of this lease agreement which are being discussed include the
following:
0 Would be a master lease with CPTC. They would be the
main tenant of the facility. They would be responsible
for doing any subleasing to other tenants. This would
include leasing to Minnetonka Dance Theater should they
be a tenant in the facility. CPTC would receive a
certain percentage of the proceeds received from
subleasing.
0 Term of lease would be for 20 years with a potential to
renegotiate for an additional five year option in the
18th year.
0 The facility would be leased to Child's Play Theatre
for $1. Child's Play Theatre would be responsible for
paying all operating and maintenance costs exclusive of
property taxes and debt financing.
0 The capital reserve fund would be established to
provide funding for major capital and improvement
items. CPTC would contribute to this fund on an annual
basis and also a portion of the funds potentially
received from subleasing of the facility would be
~
Honorable Mayor and City Council
May 27, 1993
Page 7
placed into this account. The City/HRA would maintain
control of disbursement of funds from the account.
0 CPTC and the City would meet on an annual basis to
schedule community usage of the facility. It would be
understood that the City would have use of the facility
at certain times.
Future Action
Based on the input from the Council it is assumed that the staff
will continue to work with Copeland-Mithun and Child's Play
Theatre to finalize various agreements necessary to facilitate
the entertainment complex project. As part of the overall
discussion at the June 1 meeting the Council is asked to provide
direction to staff as relates to how they wish staff to proceed
with Council/HRA action on these agreements from a timing
standpoint. Any schedule for reviewing the various agreements
will be dependent upon the following:
0 Agreement by the appropriate parties as relates to the
various terms of the agreement.
0 The amount of public input and review that the Council
will request be undertaken.
In consideration of the above, staff can attempt to try and bring
one or both of the agreements to the Council in June or wait
until July.
JK05263E