Memo Special Assessments Fire Protection Systems•
•
DATE: April 17, 1992
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jim Gessele, Engineering Superintendent
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Special Assessments
Mainstreet Service Utilities, Fire Protection
Systems, Private Improvements 5th to llth Avenues
At Council's April 7 session a public hearing held over from
the previous meeting was convened. This concerned special
assessments for service utilities and private improvements
in conjunction with Mainstreet reconstruction. Council
acted upon the appeal from the property owner at 919
Mainstreet by cancelling the assessment for a new sanitary
sewer service by reason that the owner already had an
adequate service to the street. Council also reaffirmed the
authority of Section 705 of the City Code whereby the owner
in a future connection to the new service would need to pay
a fee equal to the cost of service.
In,another appeal concerning 913 -915 Mainstreet Council
deferred action pending a resolution on staff level. The
attached letter from RLK Associates outlines discussions
held with the owner, Mr. Jim Hance. Although staff and Mr.
Hance now agree as to events surrounding the replacement of
the subject sanitary sewer service, Mr. Hance feels his
appeal should stand and wishes to address Council again.
Staff still stands by its recommendation for denial of the
appeal on the basis that the existing service pipe was in
need of replacement by reason of its cracked and extremely
corroded condition.
JG /rr
CITY OF HOPKINS
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING
Amended Date
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of
Hopkins, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the
Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota
at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 17, 1992, to hear all persons
concerning the adoption of the assessment roll for Public
Improvement Project 90 -04B and to adopt the assessment roll
as presented or amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. The assessment roll as
herein described is on file in the office of the Assessment
Clerk. The total amount to be assessed is $128,935.43.
AREA TO BE ASSESSED: Mainstreet from 5th Avenue to
llth Avenue - Water and Sanitary Sewer Services, Fire
Protection Systems, Other Certain Private Improvements
All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with
reference to this matter may present their cases at this
hearing, either orally or in writing. No appeal may be
taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a
written objection signed by the property owner is filed with
the Assessment Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Even
though appeals are due by the hearing date on March 17,
1992, the Assessment Clerk strongly recommends that appeals
be submitted to her office by March 9, 1992. Appeal forms
will, be available at the assessment hearing or at the
Assessment Clerk's office at the Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st
Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court
pursuant to MSA Section 429.081 by serving notice of the
appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Hopkins
within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment
roll and by filing such notice with the district court
within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor and City
Clerk. The City Council is to adopt the final assessment
roll at its April 7, 1992 meeting.
Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193
to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the
payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a
person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments. The procedures for applying
for such deferment are available from the Assessment Clerk.
Deferment applications should be submitted to the Assessment
Clerk by March 9, 1992.
•
The following information shall also apply:
1. The property owner shall have the right to prepay
the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without
interest from April 7, 1992 to May 7, 1992, to the Clerk at
City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota. You
may at any time thereafter, pay to the Clerk the entire
amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the
succeeding year.
2. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of
25 percent of the total assessment has been authorized by
ordinance, and can be paid within 30 days following the
adoption of the assessment roll (April 7, 1992 to May 7,
1992) .
3. The rate of interest to be accrued, if the
assessment is not prepaid within the required time period,
is proposed to be 8 percent commencing on the date of
adoption by the City Council.
4. Such assessment shall be payable over a period of
fifteen years.
5. The amount to be specially assessed against your
property is shown on the statement of assessment sent to you
by mail.
This is an important hearing because this is your last
opportunity to be heard on the matter of this assessment
which affects your property. If you have any questions
regarding this assessment, please call the Engineering
Department or the Assessment Clerk at 935 -8474.
mo d: es A. Genellie, City Clerk
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
Publish in Hopkins Sailor, Hopkins, Minnesota
February 26 and March 4, 1992
•
(address of property owner)
k, n_s
ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM
PROJECT NO.
Address of Assessed Parcel 91 J9 ) 3 -YNA
5 e. 1,u e, - R 4
What assessment does this concern
Property Identification Number:
Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing?
(signature)
Yes ( ) No
Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the
council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This
form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no
later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing.
Your request will become part of the public hearing record.
I request that the City Council consider (check one):
a .( *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of
permanent disability)
b. () *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age)
c. Cancellation of assessment t-'d ?l
d. () Revision of assessment
Reason for the request:
iLl asv
c {J r tc r) Of in A v11 .) i cam
* You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of
assessment and provide the city verification of your income
or disability.
-Tarr/6?-5 //- II an a
(print name)
(date)
telephone
Zip ,c-5".34-
(RIK 922 Mainstreet
Hopkins, Mn.
55343
1111SOCIATES (612) 933 -0972
LTD. fax: (612) 933 -1153 1
April 13, 1992
Mr. Lee Gustafson
City of Hopkins
1010 First Street South
Hopkins, MN 55343
Dear Mr. Gustafson:
A meeting was held between RLK Associates and Jim Hance subsequent to the April 7 City Council
meeting. This meeting was called to discuss the discrepancies in the information supplied to the council.
In MR. Hance's opinion, these discrepancies made it appear as if he were not telling the truth.
One problem which has surfaced during the discussions between RLK Associates and Mr. Hance is the
use of industry catch phrases. These descriptions were used by our firm in the original meetings with
Mr. Hance, and he had no way of understanding exactly what was being said. Furthermore, these catch
phrases were not explained to him in enough detail or to his satisfaction.
During the course of our April 9 meeting with Mr. Hance, we reviewed the string of occurrences which
led us to this point. Documented below is a chronological outline of these events as agreed upon by both
parties:
In June of 1991, Jim Hirz and Jim Hance met at his building at 913 Mainstreet. Many items regarding
the Mainstreet project were discussed, and a Pre- assessment Inventory was completed. At that point a
visual inspection was made of the water service, and it was found to be lead. Jim Hirz informed Mr.
Hance that all lead water services were to be replaced as part of a council mandate, to which Mr Hance
was agreeable. Jim Hirz told Mr. Hance that he had knowledge of the condition of his sewer service,
but would get back to him at a later date regarding this.
On August 5, 1991, Jim Hirz meets Mr. Hance at the Hance Hardware store to discuss the action steps
on Mr. Hance's sewer service. Mr Hance asked Jim Hirz about the condition of the pipe. Jim told him
that there was no televised inspection available for his service, and reminded Mr. Hance that in their
earlier meeting Mr. Hance had said that there had been no trouble with the service previously (Mr. Hance
has no recollection of being told there was no TV tape). Based upon this information, Mr. Hance elected
not to replace his service, and signed a utility service waiver form.
On August 10, 1991, the contractor made repairs to the sewer service at JAKs Antiques at 914
Mainstreet. During excavation for this repair it became necessary to cut the sewer service to Mr.
Hance's property in order to get the trench box in the ground. This process had been completed several
times before, and in all instances the service was repaired at the full expense of the contractor. However,
the riser pipe to Mr. Hance's property showed visual cracking, and when cut it was discovered that the
walls of the service were extremely corroded. Jim Hirz looked at the pipe and told the contractor that
it would probably need to be replaced. Jim then tried to contact Mr. Hance. When no answer was
received at the Hance home, Jim called the hardware store and left a message for Mr. Hance. The
contractor was instructed to make the necessary repairs, and the trench was backfilled at the end of the
day.
Civil Engineering • Transportation • Infrastructure Redevelopment
• Landscape Architecture • Construction Management
•
Mr. Lee Gustafson
April 13, 1992
Page 2
In March of 1992, Mr. Hance contacted Jim Hirz after receiving his assessment notice. Jim explains the
situation to him. Mr. Hance expresses his dissatisfaction at the handling of this item.
On April 6, 1992, Jim Hirz and Mr. Hance meet at the RLK Associates offices. Mr. Hance indicates
that he is very unhappy about the situation and would like to appeal the assessment. Jim directs him to
Robin at the City, where an assessment appeal form is filed.
On April 7, a letter is drafted to Lee Gustafson by RLK explaining the situation. In this letter it is stated
erroneously that a sewer tape does exist. for this property, when in fact there is none. This letter is
presented to council at the meeting.
Mr. Hance is very concerned amour the handling of this situation. He feel; that he lost his right to be
involved in the decision - making process. He is furthermore very unhappy about the waiver form he was
asked to sign, which, after further review, he feels was very one -sided on behalf of the City.
Mr. Hance has furthermore expressed very serious doubts about the condition of the sewer pipe.
Although he was not present, and he does trust the professional judgement of RLK Associates, he would
have preferred to have made the judgement on the condition of the pipe himself.
Finally, Mr. Hance has concerns about how he feels he was treated at the April 7 City Council meeting.
Mr. Hance will address these issues himself at the next meeting. However, it is important to note that
Mr. Hance has been very open and fair in all his dealings with RLK Associates. He has cooperated with
all our requests and shown a genuine interest in and support of the Mainstreet project.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this issue please feel free to call.
Charles R. Poppler
I have rxierved this document and agree with the contents as stated above.
Jim H� nce
April 6, 1992
Mr. Lee Gustafson
City of Hopkins
1010 First Street South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
Dear Lee:
Sincerely,
ames . Hirz
Senior Engineering Technician
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to call.
ba.
• Civil Engineering • Transportation • Infrastructure Redevelopment
• Landscape Architecture • Construction Management
RIK 922 Mainstreet
Hopkins, Mn.
55343
(612) 933 -0972
SSOCIATES LTD. fax: (612) 933 -1153
This letter is in response to the assessment appeal by Mr. James Hance. Mr. Hance
approached RLK Associates regarding this appeal on April 6, 1992.
Prior to beginning the project, I met with Mr. Hance to discuss his services. At that point I
informed him that I had seen a televised report of his sanitary line, and that the pipe looked to
be in decent shape. I told him that his water service was lead pipe and would have to be
replaced. He was agreeable to this, and the proper paperwork was executed.
During construction it became necessary to cut Mr. Hance's sanitary service in order to get a
trench box in the ground. As a result of this cut is was discovered that the walls of the pipe
were corroded and thin, and a determination was made by our firm that the pipe was
unserviceable and needed to be replaced. A call was placed for Mr. Hance at his home. When
no one answered the phone, a call was placed to the Hance Hardware store, and a message was
left, with a gentleman who answered the telephone, informing Mr. Hance that the line was bad
and would have to be replaced.
At this point in time the repair was made to the sewer at Mr. Hance's building, which is
located at 913 Mainstreet. The trench was backfilled and compacted when all repairs were
complete.
Mr. Hance contacted me after assessment notices had been issued on the utility portion of
Segment Three. He said that he thought I had indicated that his sanitary service did not need to
be replaced. I explained that when the service was uncovered that an unsatisfactory condition
was found to have existed. I further explained that attempts to contact him at the time of the
repair were unsuccessful. He indicated that he was not happy about the situation, and left it at
that. I informed Jim Gessele that an appeal on the assessment may be forthcoming.
Given the information, it is the contention of RLK Associates that all actions by our firm and
the contractor were within the mandates of the City Council order to replace all bad services.
It is an unfortunate circumstance that Mr. Hance apparently was not given the telephone
message; but the fact remains that a new service was needed and a new service was installed.
Asses Roll
Project 90 -04: Mainstreet (Segment #3)
Address lot Bieck Pin late lot Private Water Sewer Arrant.
Footage kaprovment Santee Service Total
M.1ntreet Pt A 1 24- 117 -22 43 0154 9-3 199.35 997.93 0.00 0.00 997.93
501 Mainsheet Audttar Sub. 24.117- 2242 0009 8.3 139.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 000
517 14a54uheet Auditor Sub 24. 117 -22 42 0008 8-3 5000 329284 0.00 3506 00 6798 84
525 Mainsheet 9-11 64 24-117 -22 42 0166 B-3 85.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
M.hrtreet Abandon R/R 24.117 -2243 0003 8-3 38.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
600 Mainsheet 1- 10.40 -42 2 34.117.2243 0032 - 8.3 274.86 959.50 0.00 0.00 959 50
Mainsheet 18 10.12 65 24- 117 -22 42 0169 13-3 26.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
611 Mainsheet 10 65 24.117 -22 42 0030 9-3 117.11 000 0.00 000 0.00
Mainsheet Pt 11 65 24- 117 -22 42 0031 B-3 6.30 0.00 0 00 0 00 000
Malnatrcet 1811 65 24.117 -2242 0032 B-3 43.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 000
621 Mainsheet 12 65 24- 117 -22 42 0033 9-3 50.00 000 - 000 0 00 000
701 Mainsheet 8.7 66 24- 117.22 42 0049 8-3 90 00 000 0.00 000 000
704 M41tuahcct 6 3 24- 117.2243 0057 63 4500 000 0.00 0.00 000
706 Mainsheet 5 3 24. 117.2243 0066 9-3 45.00 0.00 0.00 3506 350600
709 34a66.t.eet 9 66 24- 117.22 42 0060 B 3 45.00 000 000 003 000
710 Mainsheet 71 4 3 24- 117.22 43 0054 8-3 22 50 000 0.00 000 000
712 Mawtrcet Pt 4 3 24- 117.22 43 0065 13-3 22.50 000 1405 00 3506 00 4911 00
714 Mauutreet 3 3 24-117-22 43 0053 B 3 4500 0.00 0 -00 3506 00 1506 00
715 Mahuhce 10 GO 24 117.22 42 0021 B 3 45 00 000 000 0 810 000
717 Mainsheet 7< 11 66 24. 117.22 42 0052 B 3 25 00 2804 86 0 3506 00 6110 06
720 Marruhcct 2 3 24. 117.22 43 0062 B 3 45 00 3976 01 1405 00 000 5381 01
Marrutrcct Pt 11 66 24- 117.22 42 0063 13-3 20 00 971 50 000 000 971 50
723 Matrt.trcct 12 66 24 117.22 42 0054 B 3 SO 11 000 000 000 000
724 Matnatrect 1 3 24- 117.2243 0021 B-3 4986 000 000 000 000
801 Mainsheet 8 67 24-117-2242 0066 8-3 45,00 219 51 1405 00 000 1624 51
802 Mainsheet 6 4 24-117-22 43 0100 8-3 45 00 000 0 00 0 00 000
804 Matnatrect 5 • 24- 117 -22 43 0099 B 3 45 00 0.00 0,00 3506 00 3506 00
805 Mahutraet 9 67 24. 117.22 42 0067 B-3 4500 000 000 3506 00 350E 00
809 34.huhect Pt 10 67 24.117.22 42 0068 8-3 22 50 000 0 00 3506 00 3506 00
810 Mainsheet 4 4 24.117 -22 43 0098 B-3 45 00 000 1405 00 3506 00 4911.00
811 M.Wtrcet Pt 10 67 24- 117 -2242 0069 B3 2250 000 140500 350600 491100
814 Mainsheet 3 4 24. 117 -22 43 0097 8-3 4500 1169.50 1405 00 3506 00 6080.50
815 Mawt.ect 11 67 24- 117.2242 0070 8.3 45.00 000 000 350600 350600
817 Mainsheet 12 67 24- 117 -22 42 0071 8-3 45 GO 235200 000 3506 00 5858 00
818 Mawheet 2 4 24- 117.2243 0096 B-3 45.00 306000 000 350600 656600
921 1441n.heet 13 67 24- 117.22 42 0072 13-3 50.11 2641.95 000 3506 00 6147.95
824 Maortreet 1 4 24- 117.22 43 0095 8-3 49 86 14850 0 00 0.00 148 50
901 Mauutreet 10 68 24- 117 -22 31 0014 B-3 45 00 0.00 000 0 00, 000
902 M.uutreet 6 5 24- 117.22 34 0015 13-3 45.00 000 000 0.00 000
903 1448oMe et Pt 11 68 24- 117.22 31 0015 8.3 25.88 0.00 0.00 3506 00 3506 00
905 Mainsheet Pt 11812 68 24. 117 -22 31 0016 B-9 38 12 000 1405.00 0.00 1405 00
906 Mainsheet 5 5 24- 117.22 34 0014 8-3 45 00 0.00 0.00 000 000
910 MaWhect 4 5 24. 117 -22 34 0013 8-3 45.00 2597.00 000 0.00 2597.00
911 Mainsheet Pt 12 68 24- 117 -22 31 0017 B-3 26 00 000 0.00 0 O 00
913 •.6uttect 13 68 24.117.22 31 0018 13-3 44.50 474.86 - 1405.00 3506 00 5385 86
914 Mahutrest Pt 3 5 24.117 -22 34 0012 8-3 28 GO 4056.88 0.00 3506 00 7562 88
916 M.nuhect Pt 283 5 24.117.22 34 0011 9-3 4000 213.54 1405 00 3506 00 5124 54
917 Mainsheet Pt 13-15 68 24.117.22 31 0137 B-3 22.82 000 0.00 3506 00 3506 00
918 M.w8eet • Pt 2 5 24-117-22 34 0010 8-3 22.00 000 000 0.00 0 00
921 Mainsheet Pt 148115 68 24.117 -2231 0138 8-3 28.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00
922 Mainsheet 1 5 24. 117.22 34 0009 9-3 38.44 99.00 000 0.00 99 00
923 Mainsheet Pt 15 68 24.117 -22 31 0021 9-3 38.56 000 0.00 3506.00 3506.00
1001 Mainsheet 10 69 24- 117.2231 0031 B-3 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 00
1002 Mahstmt 6 6 24- 117 -22 34 0041 9-3 45.00 1267.43 000 000 1267 43
1006 Mateteeet 5 6 24.117 -2234 0040 B-3 45.00 168 95 1405 00 0.00 157395
1007 M.huheet 11 69 24.117 -22 31 0032 8-3 45.00 000 000 000 000
1009 Mainsheet 12 69 24.117 -22 31 0033 B-3 45.00 440.50 1405.00 350600 5351.50
1010 Mainsheet 4 6 24.117.22 34 0039 B-3 45.00 000 000 000 000
1014 Ma1n.tr80 4 Pt 3 6 24 . 117 -22 34 0125 B-3 39 50 0 00 000 3506 00 3506 00
1016 Mauutrect Pt 283 6 24 -117 -2234 0124 8-3 28.00 000 000 000 000
1022 Mainsheet 1,71 2 6 24.117 -22 34 0118 8-3 60 94 483 67 0.00 0.03 483 67
1023 Mainsheet 13 -15 69 , 24.117 -22 31 0034 13-3 133.20 446 50 0.00 0.00 446 SO
3188 99 128935 43
6
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 92 -30
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 90 -04B
MAINSTREET SERVICE UTILITIES AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as
required by law, the City Council has met and heard and
passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for
the construction of water and sanitary sewer services, fire
protection systems, and other certain private improvements,
as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 90-
04B, Mainstreet, and has amended such proposed assessment as
it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby
accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against
the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein
included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against
it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual
installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first
of the installments to be payable on or after the first
Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate
of 8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this
assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be
added interest on the entire assessment from April 21, 1992
until December 31, 1993. To each subsequent installment
when due shall be added interest from one year on all unpaid
installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the
Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of
the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds
by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as
provided for the assessments herein made, upon any
properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon
any properties abutting on the improvement but not made,
upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not
herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions
relating to such properties make such assessment feasible.
•
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits
nonabutting properties which may be served by the
improvement when one or more later extensions or
improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed,
therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the
Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section
420.051, to reimburse the City by adding any portion of the
cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later
extension or improvements.
5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified
duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be
extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 21st
day of April, 1992.
ATTEST:
III James A. Genellie, City Clerk
BY
Nelson W. Berg, Mayor
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SS.
COUNCIL OF HOPKINS
James A. Genellie, being first duly sworn, deposed and says:
I am a United States citizen, over 21 years of age, and the
City Clerk of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota.
On February 26, 1992, acting on behalf of the said city, I
deposited in the United States post office at the City of
Hopkins, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of hearing
on proposed assessments, Mainstreet Utility Improvements,
Project 90 -04B, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage
thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at
the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing
list.
There is delivery service by United States mail between the
place of mailing and the places so addressed.
Subscribed and sworn to efore me this 26th day of February,
1
JAMES T. GESSELE
NOTARY PUBLIC — MINNESOTA
'cc- HENNEPIN COUNTY
r My commission expires 3.19 -
Signature
Notary Public
m
List:January 28, 1992 90 -041g3
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0154
he Luther Co Ltd Prtshp
353 Wayzata Blvd #204
pls, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0009
Sinclair Marketing Inc
550 E. So Temple
PO Box 30825
Salt Lake City, UT 84130
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0008
517 Partnership
4010 W 65th St #216
Edina, MN 55435
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0166
Conoco Inc
%Conoco Tax Dept
PO Box 1267
Ponca City, OK 74603
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0003
Eugene J. Maxwell
4 37 21st Ave No
)pkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0032
Hagen Properties
Hopkins Village Apartments
33 10th Ave So #100
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0169
Hansord Agency Inc.
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0030
The Luther Co.
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0031
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
lb nneapolis, MN 55416
IN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0032
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0033
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0049
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22'43 0057
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0056
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0050
The Luther Co
5353 Wayzata Blvd #204
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0054
Bob & Gren Kanduth
9601 Crestwood Terrace
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0055
Bob & Gren Kanduth
9601 Crestwood Terrace
Eden Prairie, MN 55347
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0053
Carlson & Carlson
11910 Lake St Ext
Minnetonka, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0051
Vic's Red Door Tavern
Dwight K. Yerxa
715 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0052
Hopkins HRA
1010 First St So
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0052
Frank & Esther Koss
11321 Frair Lane
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0053
Hopkins HRA
1010 First Street So
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0054
Hopkins HRA
1010 First Street So
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0051
Frank & Esther Koss
11321 Friar Lane
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0066
Maurice Rischall
United Surplus Stores Inc
785 53rd Ave N.E.
Fridley, MN 55421
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0100
Excel Properties Ltd Prtshp
16955 Viadel Campo Suite 120
San Diego, CA 92127
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0099
Harold E. Stiele
& Jerry F. Stiele
6 18th Ave No
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0067
Tipar Investments
2520 Larpentuer
St. Paul, MN 55113
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0068
Hopkins Best Steak
Tommy Mihas
809 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0098
Hayne -Hyung J.&
Y.S. Cho
14720 Crestview Lane
Minnetonka, MN 55345
List:January 28, 1992 90 -041g3
PIN #: 24-117-22 42 0069
Il ale W. Lommen
275 5 Pionneer Trail
ien Prairie, MN 55344
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0097
Mainstreet Bar & Grill
Marc E. Maslow
814 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0070
Lommen Partnership
17275 Pioneer Trail
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0071
Pete Batinich
4725 Kingsview Ln N
Plymouth, MN 55446
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0096
Buds Music Center
Redgren Properties
2 0 Mainstreet
pkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 42 0072
Todd Johnson
& David Swanson
13520 North St
Minnetonka, MN 55345
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 43 0095
Redgren Properties
820 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0014
Mainstreet Antique Mall
of Hopkins
901 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0015
Hopkins HRA
1010 1st St So
kips, MN 55343
_N #: 24- 117 -22 31 0015
W.M.K Holding Co
5801 Oliver Ave S
Minneapolis, MN 55419
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0016
Albert Pike Lodge #237
907 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343 •
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0014
Olson Building Partnership
10001 Wayzata Blvd Suite 100
Minnetonka, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0013
Glenn F. &
Sandra Wong
7100 N Willow Lane
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0017
Carl Nygren Trust
c/o The Bank of Wayzata
900 E Wayzata Blvd
Wayzata, MN 55391
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0018
Patricia A. Hance
233 Campbell Drive
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0012
Hopkins HRA
1010 1st St So
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0011
Mashek Tailors & Cleaners
Gerald J. Mashek
916 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0137
D.H. Perkl /R.H. Mason
14201 Excelsior Blvd
Minnetonka, MN 55345
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0010
Stiele & Stiele
Partnership
6 18th Ave No
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0138
Paul E. Mosby
921 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0009
Stiele & Stiele
Partnership
6 18th Ave N
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0021
Bess Ebenstien Adm
3029 France Ave #410
Minneapolis, MN 55416
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0031
Merriam Park Pro Bldg
10 North 10th Ave.
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0041
J.L. Kakach
7000 Eden Prairie Rd
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0040
David F. Johnson
17310 State Hwy 101 West
Wayzata, MN 55391
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0032
Merriam Park Co
10 North 10th Ave.
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0039
Tub & Shower Inc
912 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0124
Jack Yees Restaurant
Sam Cheung Lau
1016 Mainstreet
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0033
TCF Bank Savings FSB
Attn: Diane Christen 001 -03 -L
801 ,Marquette Ave
Minneapolis, MN 55402
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0125
Donald Hagen & Herbert Mason
c/o Mason Properties
1589 Hwy 7 Suite #203
Hopkins, MN 55343
List:January 28, 1992 90 -041g3
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 34 0118
Donald H. Perkl
33 10th Ave So Suite 100
Hopkins, MN 55343
PIN #: 24- 117 -22 31 0034
D.H. Perkl /R.H. Mason
14201 Excelsior Blvd
Minnetonka, MN 55343
.......... ' _ ' '''''''''
pt 2
""7
ti
... 0 *?9z 1 ------ _.. .
1
aft 1 f� , A
.- . � . ......
. . ....
C1ENi4
2
••••••••••
gur
9 '0Z1a
OL -6- b any
S
JA\
• • • • • • • ••
•
•
•
•
iA d HL
311d N101
Nqik
H1 j z� •a
(69)
C I T Y O F H O P K I N S
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 1, 1992
TO: Lee Gustafson
FROM: Jim Gessele J TG
SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT POLICY CONCERNING UTILITY SERVICES
MAINSTREET RECONSTRUCTION
I have outlined the discussion we held April 21 with RLK
Associates concerning the assessment of service replacements on
the final phase of Mainstreet reconstruction. I have also
detailed the consultant engineer's pre- and postconstruction
communication procedures to be employed.
Water Services
A. 11th to 13th Avenues south side
All services replaced at City cost regardless of condition
because storm sewer construction dictates service
replacement; financed by TIF funds.
B. 13th Avenue to Shady Oak Road south side
1. Curb box location ok:
o If existing copper service, cut and reconnect at
City cost.
o If existing lead or galvanized service, replace
service and assess to owner.
2. Curb box needs to be relocated:
o If existing copper service, relocate box and
replace service at City cost based on savings per
contractor's bid prices.
o If existing lead or galvanized service, relocate
box and replace service at City's cost based on:
(1) City' current assessment policy;
Lee Gustafson
May 1, 1992
Page 2
(2) Cost savings to City (contractor's bid price
for a new servcie, which includes a curb box,
is less than the component prices for a curb
box relocate and service replacement.
C. llth Avenue to Shady Oak Road north side
1. Curb box location ok:
o If existing copper service, make copper to copper
reconnect at City cost.
o If existing lead or galvanized service, replace
service and assess to owner.
2. Curb box needs to be relocated:
o If existing copper service, relocate box and
replace service at City cost based on savings per
contractor's bid price.
o If existing lead or galvanized service, relocate
box and replace service at City's cost based on:
(1) City' current assessment policy;
(2). Cost savings to City (contractor's bid price
for a new servcie, which includes a curb box,
is less than the component prices for a curb
box relocate and service replacement.
Sanitary Sewer Services
A. llth to 13th Avenues south side
All services replaced at City cost regardless of condition
because storm sewer construction dictates service
replacement; financed by TIF funds.
B. llth to 13th Avenues north side
13th to 15th Avenues north and south side
All services replaced at City cost regardless of condition
because sanitary sewer reconstruction dictates service
replacement; financed by sanitary utility fund.
C. 15th Avenue to Shady Oak Road north and south side
If video inspection or construction trenching reveals
service to'be in disrepair, the service will be replaced and
assessed to the owner.
Lee Gustafson
May 1, 1992
Page 3
Communication Procedures With Prouerty Owners
A. Use of video to determine condition of sanitary service
where possible.
B. RLK contacts owners and informs them of video results
E /JG05012E
o If video shows bad service it will be replaced at
owner's cost. If video results are positive, owner is
informed that construction trenching and pipe
inspection may reveal service is in disrepair and the
service will nevertheless be replaced at owner's cost.
o If no video available, owner will be informed that
construction trenching and pipe inspection could
indicate bad service and it will be replaced at owners
cost.
C. RLK will contact all property owners concerning waiver.
o Explain terms of waiver.
o Seek signatures - waiver form placed on file.
o If no signature RLK will witness such on the waiver
form and it will become City record.
D. Field Inspection
o Photos
o Service pipe samples taken and address notation.
o Make attempts to contact owner and share field
evidence.
o Follow -up letter from RLK regardless of success at
verbal communication.
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 93 -102
ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 90 -04B
MAINSTREET SERVICE UTILITIES AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS
11TH AVENUE TO SHADY OAK ROAD
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by
law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all
objections to the proposed assessment for the construction of
water and sanitary sewer services, fire protection systems, and
other certain private improvements, as described in the files of
the City Clerk as Project 90 -04B, Mainstreet, and has amended
such proposed assessment as it deems just,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, as amended, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and
shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named
therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found
to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual
installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of
the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in
January, 1994, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on
the entire assessment from October 5, 1993 until December 31,
1994. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council
to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of
this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying
additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the
assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the
improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting on the
improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when
changed conditions relating to such properties make such
assessment feasible.
4. To the extent that this improvement benefits nonabutting
properties which may be served by the improvement when one or
more later extensions or improvements are made, but which are not
herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the