Loading...
Memo Council Worksession - Strategic Economic Plan ,,', :..',..,', , ..-, '. C I T Y o F HOP KIN S M E M 0 RAN DU M DATE: July 16, 1992 , TO: Honorable~nd city Council FROM: Tom Harmenih' , c~mmun~ ty Development Director SUBJECT: COUNCIL WORKSESSION - STRATEGIC PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT --------------------------------- Purpose of Discussion' The City Council is, scheduled to meet at 6:30 p.m., prior to the regular City Council meeting on July 21, to discuss the draft plan of the Strategic Plan for Economic Development for the City . of Hopkins. Currently, the Strategic Planning Task Force is undertaking a process of receiving public input on the proposed plan. The discussion during the Council worksession is intended to provide an opportunity for the Council, as individuals and a group, to provide comments on the recommended goals and actions steps in the strategic Plan. Attached is a copy of the Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan for Economic Development. The Mayor and Councilmember Anderson will be reviewing on an issue by issue basis the goals and action steps in the action plan. As only an hour is being allotted for this discussion, your review of the plan prior to the City Council meeting will be 'very beneficial. As the City Council reviews the draft plan, it is suggested that the Council keep the following thoughts in mind as a means to assist in developing questions and comments on the plan. These questions include: 0 Do you agree with the mission statement and the overall goals in each of the five issue areas? 6 Do you agreeandjor have any comments on any of the action steps identified to accomplish the goals for . each of the five areas? 0 How do you feel the pla~ affects business and industry as well as the residential constituents in Hopkins? ~. -- . 0 ~ Honorable Mayor and City Council . July 16, 1992 Page 2 0 Are there any economic development issues which are not included in the plan that should be addressed? 0 How do you feel about the expenditure of public dollars to implement the action steps in the plan? I have attached a copy of the schedule which has been developed which illustrates the process to be used to provide for the eventual adoption of the strategic Plan. Hopefully this schedule will give the Council a sense as to how their comments on Tuesday night will fit into the overall adoption process. . Attachment TH07152G . . . -->- - - r' ~ TIME FRAME FOR PUBLIC INPUT PROCESS AND REMAINING RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE STRATEGIC PLANNING TASK FORCE:. Time frame UP to formal Council approval: June 25 strategic Planning Committee Meeting . June 29 - July 10 Schedule meetings for public input process July 13 - Aug.17 Hold public input meetings July 16 Joint Business Council/HCP meeting , July 20 Live cable TV call in show . 'July 21 Council work-session at 6:30 p.m. (before regularly scheduled Council meeting) July 22 Neighborhood meeting - "The Avenues" . July 23 Meeting with neighborhood presidents and possibly 1 or 2 representatives from, each of the neighborhoods. July 27 Hold general public information meeting at City Hall. Staff and one or two Task Force members to moderate this meeting. July 28 Zoning & Planning Commission meets to review plan and comment. (before regularly scheduled Z & P meeting) August 10 Senior Citizen meeting August 24 Strategic Planning Committee meets to discuss and review public comments. Finalize entire Strategic Planning document. August 25 - Sep. 3 Final revisions are made to plan September 1 city Council meets to review plan and comment. This will be a work-session prior to the meeting. '. ' September 8 Joint Council/Task Force work-session. Review changes made to plan by Task Force~ Detailed discussion on prioritization of action steps in _0, io . ' " relation to budget concerns, timing considerations, etc. October 6 council approves .final plan and authorizes staff to begin implementation. October 14 . strategic Planning Committee closure meeting. Review methods of critiquing and evaluating plan. Discuss outcome of overall strategic Planning pro~ess. . '. I I I ! ~-{.... . -~------:'"~"" . ! . CITY OF HOPKINS STRATEGIC PLAN FOR - . ECON.OMICDEVELOPMENT ) , . . . Prepared by Strategic Planning Task Force 'June, 1992 . ...... .... ..-........~.,~. .' .. f >, . PRFll~~!~ARY 1 'f, I -=., ~ , a b'=.f IV. L. J ;' '~ . I ... r ~ . " .. '" ' or ;..": , - . - Examine other existing facilities centrally located which may be able to house an information center , , 6. Advocate the growth and stability of community service type organizations, such as a "family resource center", and civic service organizations, such as local clubs, through informational and cooperative support when necessary. 7. Prepare a program for implementation of a pedestrian walkway and bikeway system throughout all of the city. Incorporate with present plans for HCRRA property. 8. Improve appearance of entry points to City through signage, landscaping, infrastructure, maintenance, etc. 9. ~aintain adequate buffer zones between new commercial development projects and residential properties. 10. Closely examine impacts on city wide image when considering reductions in services which affect the image of the community i.e., city wide clean-up programs, etc. . 11. Examine qevelopment, of codes which closely regulate the maintenance of commercial. properties in the city. 12. Encourage destination type businesses or ,uses which appeal 'to consumers interested in the arts, family types of uses and entertainment. ,. Page 11 ~"' - -- - . -----.-- ,.' .~ ;;"" .. ....,~ . 4. Undertake analysis of natural corridors to determine the potential 'for an improvement project which will link County Road 3 and Mainstreet. IV. Issue - Mainstreet 0 Goal No. 1 - Provide an atmosphere which will foster the retention, of existing business along Mainstreet Hopkins and attract new businesses. ' Action steps: 1. Improve the efforts to market the City's existing programs to attract/retain businesses. These programs include: the Commercial Rehabilitation and Sign Grant Program, New Business, Incentive program, Realtors Incentive Program and the Leasing Guide. Regularly assess the benefit/~mpact of this action step. 2. Explore new incentive programs to attract/retain businesses in the C.B.D. 3. continue to promote Mainstreet Hopkins through trade . show attendance, festivals, and special events such as , Farmers Market, Parades, Heritage Days and other promotional opportunities. 4. Maintain an inventory of vacant buildings along Mainstreetto provide to Realtors and potential lessors. 5. Encourage destination type businesses or uses which appeal to consumers interested in the arts, family types of uses and entertainment to locate in the C.B.D. 0 Goal No. 2 - Complete physical improvements to Mainstreet and natural corridors connecting Mainstreet to County Road 3. Action steps: 1. Analyze the effectiveness of the Mainstreet Improvement Project. 2. Undertake analysis of natural corridors to determine the potential for an improvement project which will link County Rd. 3 and Mainstreet. . Goal No. 3 - Develop and implement'new financing programs in 0 order to offer new alternatives for financing redevelopment or rehabilitation projects along Mainstreet. Page 9 --- . '1-. , -~ . Action steps: 1. Work with local banks to establish financial incentives in cooperation with existing City programs to support rehabilitation or redevelopment opportunities along Mainstreet. ' 2. Work with the "bank consortium" to assist in securing financing for redevelopment projects along Mainstreet Hopkins. The purpose of this "bank consortium" is to:, - Reduce the risk o'f individual banks - Provide an easier method of financing for some projects v. Issue - City wide Image 0 Goal No. 1 - Develop and maintain positive appearance of the City of Hopkins. Action steps: 1. continue city's ongoing effort to maintain and improve . all public infrastructure. 2. Maintain and improve upon communication between City and School District to develop a team approach toward marketing and improving the community's image. 3. ' Encourage local organizations to continue, and improve upon the quality of events and attractions, i.e. Mainstreet Days, Heritage Days, Winterfest, Raspberry Days, etc. 4. Explore implementing programs to encourage the aesthetic improvement of private property such as a landscaping award programs, and painting programs for single family properties, together with financial incentives/for undertaking landscaping improvements. - continue carrying out the recently approved "Hopkins Community Image Award" program, which gives awards for general property appearance in residential and commercial areas of the city. 5. Develop an information center in the Hopkins. - Analyze the potential of utilizing the depot as an information center, either in its current . location, or another location in the city. Page 10 .. .. f .~ .~ .~ 8. continue City's ongoing effort to maintain and improve public infrastructure in neighborhoods. 9~ Closely examine impacts on neighborhoods when considering reductions in city services which affect residential areas, L e. snow removal, garbage service, park maintenance, code enforcement, etc. III. Issue - County Road 3 o Goal No. 1 - Improve/enhance function and appearance of existing commercial, industrial, and pUblic/semi-public land uses, including visual improvements such as landscaping, screening, and tree planting. Action steps: 1. Reconvene County Road 3 Task Force insuring that entire corridor is consistently represented. Purpose of County Road 3 Task Force is to: - Represent property owners in corridor - Provide a forum for communication with .. business /propertyowners ' " . - Work with governmental agencies - Prepare long and short term recommendations for improvements - Assist in implementation of actions outlined in Strategic Plan - Undertake surveys, informational meetings, ahd other communication efforts regarding needs and desires of adjacent property owners 2. Undertake land use study for County Road 3 East between 5th Ave. and Blake Rd. in cooperation with upgrading of the roadway by Hennepin County. 3. Review and amend, as necessary, the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance to insure consistency with strategic Plan, and County Road 3 Task Force recommendations. 4. Undertake communication efforts with representatives from Hennepin County, HCRRA and City, to review strategic Plan and County Road 3 Task Force recommendations, Benshoof traffic study, and Land Use study. 5. Undertake steps to implement landscaping improvements 4It on pUblic property between Hwy. 169 & 11th Ave. Page 7 , """l)' o Goal No. 2 - Foster the development/redevelopment of '4It property along County Road 3, including consideration for a business park or major retail involving large scale single users on the R.L. Johnson property. Action steps: 1. utilize financial incentive programs for this area to encourage private reinvestment and location of new businesses on County Rd. 3. Incorporate a landscaping and signage improvement assistance program. 2. Communicate with existing business/property owners regarding: o potential improvement project(s) o development/redevelopment 3. Undertake an analysis to determine the appropriateness of locating a business park or major retail involving large scale single uses on the R.L. Johnson property and its impact on the community. 4. Work with developers concerning the undertaking ofa project on the R.L. Johnson property, as determined appropriate, including a Request For Proposals, if 4It necessary. Tie this to incentives and possibly zoning flexibility. Include property owner in process. o Goal No. 3 - Improve vehicular and pedestrian movement along , County Road 3 and enhance the link between County Road 3 and Mainstreet. Action steps: 1. Develop a program to complete a pedestrian walkway and bikeway system. Incorporate with County plans to upgrade roadway and proposed County Path System for HCRRA property. 2. Work with Hennepin County to implement a. County Rd. 3 Improvement Project as part of their 5 year Capital Improvement Plan, and begin planning for a major improvement project to this corridor, also taking into consideration the possibility and needs associated with LRT. 3. Undertake study of possibly reusing depot and incorporating the city Park with County Rd. 3 improvements. ~ Page 8 .,-- " .A__ . 2. Undertake,a "business retention and expansion" survey process to identify needs of existing businesses. 3. Work with local banks, Department of Trade & Economic Development, and SBA to increase awareness of existing programs which support business expansion. 4. Expand the "leasing guide" program, which ,provides Realtors and prospective retailers a list of available properties in the retail core, to include commercial/industrial properties in other sections of the city. 5. Expand, as much as is determined appropriate, "the City's existing programs to retain (recruit) businesses such as the Commercial Rehabilitation Loan Program and Sign Grant Program, to include other commercial/industrial areas in the City of Hopkins. 6. Encourage projects which will help to provide the full range of support services to employees and local businesses. 7. Continue to work on development of a grocery store in . Hopkins~ 8. Establish landscaping programs for all commercial/industrial area~ of the City. 9. Work with Super Valu warehouse to encourage and accommodate them in their expansion needs. 10. Work with Hennepin County on redevelopment of Hennepin ,County Public Works site. 0 Goal No. 2 - Induce targeted business and industry to locate, in Hopkins. Action steps: 1- Recruit businesses which have a relationship to the existing grocery industry. ' 2. Facilitate a project involving a large scale general merchandise store on an appropriate site which is deemed compatible with the existing residential and business community. . 3. Insure that responsible parties maintain an understanding of changes in the metropolitan, national, and world markets, and take advantage of opportunities presented. Page 5 ~ '-!fy 4. Provide incentives to create jobs for highly . skilled/technical employees. 5. Encourage projects which will help to provide the full range of support services to employees and local businesses, i.e. daycare, laundry, dry cleaners, restaurants, banking, transportation, parking, etc. II. Issue - Neighborhoods 0 Goal No. 1 - To assure strong and well maintained neighborhoods in order to foster an overall positive economic development climate in Hopkins. Action steps: 1. Develop a neighborhood outreach program and establish a Neighborhood Advisory Council (NAC) made up of representatives from every neighborhood association. - Periodic meetings between city and Neighborhood Associations to identify issues, concerns, etc. - Organize meetings between Business Community and Neighborhood Associations. . 2. Monitor'effectiveness of "Truth in Housing" ordinance to insure it is helping to maintain and upgrade residential housing stock. 3. Facilitate development which will help to meet ~'special housing needs," and encourage owner occupied housing. 4. Examine vacant properties which are currently zoned and guided for mUlti-family housing. Determine if changes need to .be made based on: - Current housing market - Land use issues - Need for owner occupied housing vs non owner occupied - Goals and objectives of strategic Plan 5. Examine and improve, as necessary, present guidelines for buffer areas between new commercial development projects and residential properties. 6. continue/expand existing housing programs pursuant to the City of Hopkins Housing Plan. , 7. Examine and ,improve housing maintenance codes and . aggressively enforce these codes. Page 6 . '::"'). -. 1. Business Retention/Recruitment 2. Neighborhoods 3. County Road 3 4. Mainstreet 5. City-Wide Image The Task Force then followed the strategic Planning process through these 5 priorities. They identified the major vision, barriers to achieving that vision, strategies to overcome those barriers, and a series of action steps to accomplish the strategies. These action steps make up the real focal point of the strategic Plan. . < , . Page 3 . " '.""J EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . During the Fall of 1991 the City of Hopkins initiated a strategic Planning process to identify and address economic development issues facing the city. This process involved the establishment of a Task Force utilizing representatives from the business, residential, and governmental sectors. This Task Force utilized the classic strategic planning approach of undertaking an environmental scan, identification of the City's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The Task Force also developed a Mission statement relating to the city's economic development efforts. This Mission statement reads as follows: To improve the economic viability of the community, in order to provide an enhanced quality of life for all participants, while maintaining a recognition of the social consequences of actions taken, as identified by the Hopkins Economic Development Strategic Plan. Lastly, the Task Force identified economic 'development issues facing the city and, using a nominal group technique, prioritized these issues. The top five economic development issues identified by the strat,gic Planning Task Force were as follows: 0 Business retention and recruitment . / 0 Neighborhoods 0 County Road 3 0 Mainstreet, 0 City wide image Upon identification of the five top economic development issues facing the city, the TaskForce developed five year goals and action plans to address these issues. A summary of these goals and action steps, by issue, are as follows: I. Issue - Business Retention/Recruitment 0 Goal No. 1 - Foster the stability and growth of existing businesses. Action steps: 1- Insure adequate training opportunities are available and easily accessible for employees of local businesses through marketing and development of locally available . training programs. Page 4 . ," '.. . INTRODUCTION During August of 1991, the City Council formally, initiated the . strategic planning process for economic development for the City of Hopkins. Hopkins is one of the only cities in Minnesota to undertake the strategic planning process specifically for economic development. It was with this in mind that Hopkins set out to prove the benefit of the strategic planning process, and how it can serve to have a positive effect on the City'S economic development policies. In August of 1991, staff and the City Council began to educate themselves on the process of strategic planning. since this process proved to be relatively new,as it relates to economic development, it became a matter of starting from the very beginning with a simple definition of strategic planning, which is as follows: r "The process by which an organization envisions its future and develops the necessary procedures and operations to achieve that future.'" There are three key aspects of this definition: ",. 0 "Envisioning" involves a belief that aspects of the future can be influenced and changed by what we do now. 0 strategic planning focuses on the process of planning rather than on the plan that is produced. 0 strategic planning is never completed. with this definition of strategic planning in mind, it became evident to the City Council that there were many reasons why the City of Hopkins should develop a strategic plan for economic development. A few of these reasons " are as follows: 0 ,Provide focus and direction for the City. 0 Provide information on the purpose and direction of the City to the general public relative to economic development. 0 Provide the general public with more of an opportunity to help shape the City'S economic development programs and policies. 0 Make the City proactive rather than reactive to economic development. . The City Council formally approved the initiation of a strategic planning process for economic development with the understanding that from this process would come a clear definition of the mission of the City regarding its economic development policy. In cooperation with this "Mission statement," the process was to involve the development . . .....~.,,- of a two year action plan, and a five year economic development goal . and implementation plan. The Council formally appointed Mayor Nelson Berg to assume the position of Chairman of the strategic Planning Task Force. The total number of members of the strategic Planning Task Force, aside from, staff and facilitator, was 11. A great deal of determination went into the selection of members to serve on the Task Force. It was evident to the Council that the makeup of the strategic Planning Task Force would provide either for the success or. .failure of the strategic planning process. It was also felt that the Task Force should be made up of persons representing a cross section of the community. With this in mind, the following people were chosen to represent the fOllowing respective groups as members of the strategic Planning Task Force: 0 Mayor Nelson Berg - City council 0 Councilmember Bob Anderson - City Council 0 Ms. Betty Folliard - Neighborhoods 0 Ms. Fran Hesch - Neighborhoods 0 " Mr. Dan Johnson - Neighborhoods 0 Mr. Gerald Bleser - Neighborhoods ,0 Dr. Harry smith -Business community 0 Mr. Bill Weiler - Business Community 0 Mr. Wendell Maddox - Business Community 0 Mr. Larry Dowell - Twinwest Chamber e 0 Ms. Pat Reuter - Zoning, and Planning These 11 members, facilitator Jim Brimeyer, and City staff members Tom Harmening, Paul Steinman, and Jim Kerrigan formally began the strategic planning process for economic development for the city of Hopkins on Saturday, November 23, 1991. The Task Force began by identifying all the issues facing the City of Hopkins of any significance relative to economic development. Once this was completed, the Task Force proceeded to identify "stakeholders," who are in some form or another, involved in this process of strategic planning. The Task Force proceeded with conducting an analysis of local resources and the City's competitive position in economic development. This is called an "environmental scan," and enabled the Task Force to more clearly understand the city's assets and liabilities for growth. The strategic Planning Task Force then undertook a "SWOT" analysis, which ~s a technique used to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) facing the City of Hopkins. A draft Mission statement was developed during this initial meeting of the Task Force. The Mission Statement was revised at each successive meeting of the Strategic Planning Task Force. These successive meetings consisted of prioritizing the issues (approximately 50 of them) identified at the first meeting into 15 major issues. Of these e" 15 major issues, the top 5 were selected to be focused upon by the Task Force. They are as follows: Page 2