CR 92-206 Assessment Roll - Purchase Mark Z Jones
'\
('
":
\ "{ y 0
'~6tober 13, 1992
-
o P \"
K
council Report 92-206
ASSESSMENT ROLL - PURCHASE OF MARK Z. JONES PROPERTY
proposed Action.
Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to approve
Resolution No. 92-89 adoptinq an assessment roll for the acquisition of the
Mark Z. Jones property and direct staff to continue to work wi ththe
Minnehaha Oaks Association on details pertaining to a loan arranqement with
the.Association.
Approval of this motion will provide sufficient direction to staff to work
out details relating to a direct loan to the Association in lieu of a
direct assessment to four property owners as originally agreed upon in a
Special Assessment Agreement between the city of Hopkins and the property
owners.
Overview.
Last March the City council approved the acquisition of the Mark Z. Jones
property with the understanding that property owners would agree to be
assessed for the full cost of the acquisition. Thus far, four property
owners have signed a special Assessment. Agreement. This results in the
four homeowners being responsible ona pro rata basis for $175,000' of the
acquisition price which remains outstanding.
411euring the course of the last several months discussions have taken place
between city staff and the Association on the concept of providing a direct
loan to the' Association in the amount of $175,000 with the understanding
that the four homeowners would be assessed directly in the event the
Association did not make its annual payment. From these discussions, City
staff and the Association have sketched out conceptual ideas as to how the
loan mechanism may work. As a result, staff has recommended that as a part
of approving the assessment roll, the Council direct staff to continue to
work with the Association on the loan concept. If it was determined in
November that the loan mechanism was not appropriate, the city could carry
through with the direct assessment to the four homeowners. Conversely, if
it was determined by the Council that the loan approach was acceptable, the
Council could cancel the assessment and implement a direct loan to the
Association.
Primary Issues to Consider.
o What is the amount of assessment to each property owner and
related terms?
o What are the details pertaining to the proposed loan arrangement?
o What are some of the consequences of each method direct
assessment to homeowner versus direct loan to Association?
o What would be the process for implementing the loan arrangement?
.
,-
Documents
Analysis of issues
Alternatives
Resolution No 92-89
Director
"
CR92-206
Page 2
-.
primary Issues to consider.
o What is the proposed assessment to each property owner and the related
terms? ·
Based upon the special assessment agreement entered into between the
four property owners and the City of Hopkins, each property owner
would be assessed a pro rata share of the remaining principal balance
of $175,000, or $43,750 per property. This assessment would be spread
over 15 years at 8% interest.
o What are the detailspertaininq to the proposed loan arrangement?
Al though staff is not yet in a position of recommending to the city
Council undertaking the loan arrangement, staff does feel that the
concept has sufficient merit to investigate it further.
The basic principles of the loan proposal are as follows:
o $175,000 loan from the city of Hopkins to the Minnehaha Oaks
Association.
.
o
Terms - 8% per annum for 15 years (declining interest - similar
to a home mortgage). Ini tial commencement of the loan to be
determined - perhaps November 1, 1992. First payment date yet to
be determined - perhaps September 1,1993.
o 15 equal payments of approximately $20,500 per year to the city,
al though the first year payment may be adjusted (assumes no
prepayments). Total principal and interest paid after the entire
term - approximately $306,000.
o prepayments would be allowed - perhaps some minimum amount would
be established.
o Security provisions in the event of non-payment by the
Association, the City would assess the four homeowners, or any
members that agree to be assessed, for a pro rata share of the
yearly payment which was not paid. Each property owner would
also be liable for a pro rata share of the entire principal and
interest amount of the loan, which equals approximately $76,000
to $77,000 per property owner. This liability would decline
yearly as payments were made by the Association or through the
assessments to the homeowners.
o
Contributions by assessed property owners to the Association for
the Association's yearly payment to the City would be credited
against the assessed homeowner's share of the principal and
interest amount for the entire loan period. The Association
would need to identify for the City which assessed member
provided the contribution.
.
.
.0'
.
CR92-206
Page 3
o Necessary agreements - it would appear two separate agreements
would need to be entered into. These agreements would be as
follows:
Loan agreement between the
specifics of this document
aforementioned provisions.
City
would
and Association.
basically contain
The
the
-
Assessment agreement between the
property owners. The contents of
include:
city
this
andindi vidual
document would
* Make reference to the aforementioned agreement.
* Property owners would consent to annual assessment
in the event of default by Association.
* Property owners would waive all rights to appeal
assessment, etc.
* Document would be recorded against properties
involved.
What are some of the consequences of each method - direct assessment
versus direct loan?
Direct Assessrnent.to Property Owners
~ Does not allow assessed homeowners to make partial payments.
It is likely that an existing homeowner would be required by a
new buyer to payoff the entire assessment at time of sale of
property.
Creates difficulties in terms of how the Association
allocate donations or grants it might receive to the
homeowners to assist them in paying for their assessment.
would
four
Direct Loan to the Association
Allows the Association to make prepayments on the loan.
Allows the four homeowners to make donations to the Association
for the Association's annual payment.
It is still likely that if a homeowner desired to sell his home,
the homeowner would need to payoff the entire assessment amount
that the property may be liable for.
Resolve questions regarding how the Association provides funds to
the homeowners.
.
.
.
CR92-206
Page 4
By and large, the benefits of utilizing the loan arrangement instead
of the direct special assessment are primarily in favor of the
Association and homeowner. The City is basically providing an
alternate method to allow for the $175,000 to be repaid in perhaps a
more efficient and useful manner and at the same time provide the City
with the necessary security provisions. The loan method will require
additional bookkeeping on the city's part regarding prepayments which
might be made, etc. However, this should not be overly burdensome.
o
What would be the process for implementing the loan arrangement?
staff has recommended that the City council adopt the assessment roll.
By law a 30 day periOd must pass before the assessment roll is sent to
the County to allow for the property owners to payoff the assessment.
This means that within the next 30 days the City will need to
determine whether or not it wishes to implement the loan arrangement.
If, for whatever reason, the loan arrangement does not appear viable,
the special assessment will be certified to the County after the 30
day period. If, however, the loan arrangement does appear viable the
City Council would be asked to approve execution of the two
agreements. The City Council would also be asked to cancel the
special assessment. The last date on which the city Council would
need to make the determination as to whether the loan arrangement
would or would not work is November 17, 1992. As a result, if the
Council should adopt staff's recommendation, staff will return either
at the next City Council meeting or November 17 with a final
recommendation regarding this matter.
Alternatives
o continue matter for further information. If the Council desires
to reserve its right of direct special assessment, the Council
would need to at least adopt the assessment roll in order to
allow for a 30 day prepayment period on the part of the
homeowners which will in turn allow the city to submit the
assessment roll to the County by the deadline of November 30.
.
.
e
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: 92-89
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS FOR
PURCHASE OF MARK Z. JONES PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Oaks Association, a non-prOf it corporation,
and property owners who owned and occupied single family
homes located along Hiawatha Avenue within the City of
Hopkins requested the city of Hopkins acquire certain
undeveloped property lying adjacent to and west of Hiawatha
Avenue, and
WHEREAS, the undeveloped property was owned by Mark Z. Jones and
consists of heavily forested trees which the Minnehaha Oaks
Association and property owners desired to be preserved for
passive park and nature area purposes for them and the'
community as a whole, and
WHEREAS,
the city of Hopkins agreed to acquire the property and the
property owners agreed to reimburse acquisition costs
incurred by the city, and
WHEREAS, the city of Hopkins, Minnehaha Oaks Association and four
property owners entered into a Special Assessment Agreement
dated 4/15/92, attached as Exhibit B, which sets forth the
terms under which the affected property owners would be
assessed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City council of the City of
Hopkins as follows:
1. Such proposed assessments, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof and hereby
accepted shall constitute the special assessments
against the lands therein named. As indicated in the
special Assessment Agreement, attached as Exhibit B,
each of the affected property owners agree that each of
the properties to be assessed will be improved and
benefited by the acquisition.
2.
Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual
installments extending over the period of 15 years' at
8% interest, the first installments to be paid with the
real estate taxes due and payable in 1993. To the
first installments shall be added interest on the
entire respective assessment from November 1, 1992
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO: 92-89
Page 2
until December 31, 1993. To each subsequent
installment, when due shall be added interest for one
year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may at any time
after the adoption of the assessments and by November
27, 1992 pay the whole of the assessments against any
parcel to the ci ty Manager, and no interest shall be
charged if the entire assessment is paid by November
19, 1992. Also, the owner of the property may at
anytime thereafter, except between November 15 and
December 31 of each year, pay to the City Manager, the
entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified
duplicate or duplicates of these assessments to the
Hennepin County Audi tor to be extended on the proper
tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be
collected and paid over the same manner as other
municipal taxes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 20th day of
October, 1992.
Nelson W. Berg, Mayor
ATTEST:
James A. Genellie, city Clerk
~
.
.
.
Exhibit A
1. Property Acquisition: 413 Hiawatha Avenue
P.I.D. #19-117-21 12 0019
Legal Description: Tract A Registered Land Survey No. 825
Total Cost: $43,750 at 8% Interest Over 15 Years
2. Property Acquisition: 435 Hiawatha Avenue
P.I.D. #19-117-21 12 0015
Legal Description: Tract A Registered Land Survey No. 362
Total Cost: $43,750 at 8% Interest Over 15 Years
3.
Property Acquisition: 511 Hiawatha Avenue
P.I.D. #19-117-21 12 0005
Legal Description: That part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 lying
SWly of creek S of a line running E at right angles from the
W line of Lot 1 at a pt dis 10 ft N from the most Sly cor
thereof and N of a line runningE at right angles from the W
line of Lot 2 at a pt dis 90 ft from the NW cor thereof
Block 1 Minnehaha Oaks
Total Cost: $43,750 at 8% Interest Over 15 Years
4. Property Acquisition: 505 Hiawatha Avenue
P.I.D. #19-117-21 12 0006
Legal Description: That part of Lots 2, 3 and 4 lying S of
a line running E at right angles from the W line of Lot 2 at
a pt dis 90 ft S from the NW cor thereof and N of a line
running E at right angles from the W line of Lot 3 at a pt
dis 50 ft S from the NW cor thereof Lots 2, 3 and 4 Block 1
Minnehaha Oaks
Total Cost: $43,750 at 8% Interest Over 15 years
/' .
.:---
/
i
...
"",
.
.
'-'-
/
I
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
This
is
15+h
day
made
on
the
Agreement
of
Apt"'; I
,
1992 by and among the City of Hopkins, a
municipal corporation ("City"), Minnehaha Oaks Association, a
nonprofit corporation ("Association") and
, (collectively referred to as "Homeowners"):
RECITALS:
1. City is a municipal corporation created by Charter
and possessing all of the powers of a municipality.
2. Association is a nonprofit corporation formed for
the
purchase
of
promotion,
acquisition, preservation,
maintenance and management of shade trees and urban forest
.and urban forest areas.
3. Homeowners
occupy certain single family
own
and
residences located on Hiawatha Avenue within the City.
4. The Association.. and Homeowners have requested the
City to acquire certain undeveloped property lying adjacent
to and west of Hiawatha Avenue. The land is owned by Mark Z.
Jones, II ("Owner") and consists of heavily forested trees
which the Association and Homeowners desire be preserved for
passive park and nature area purposes for them and the
community as a whole.
5. The Owner has elected to convey said land to. the
City for the sum and upon the terms hereinafter described.
6. The Homeowners have agreed to reimburse acquisition
costs incurred by the City in the sum and upon the terms
hereinafter set forth.
-1-.
(
" ./
',/'
. property
7.
The City has determined the market value of the
,
i
I
!
by appraisal to be in the sum of One Hundred
Ninety-two Thousand Dollars ($192,000.00).
;
NOW,
THEREFORE,
in
consideration
of the mutual
benefits, the terms cif this Agreement accord to all parties,
it is agreed as follows:
1. The City shall acquire the land from the Owner for
the
sum
of
Two
Hundred Eighty-five Thousand Dollars'
($285,000.00) payable in cash upon the receipt of which good
and marketable title shall be conveyed to the City.
2. The Owner has separately agreed to make a
charitable contribution in the sum of One Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($100,000.00) to assist in the acquisition of said
.
land.
3.
In consideration for the action of the City in
acquiring by purchase for the sum of Two Hundred'Eighty-five
Thousand
Dollars
($285,000.00),
the
premises
legally
~
described on Exhibit A and in fulfillment of the request by
the Association for such acquisition, each of the Homeowners
as
parties
to
this
Agreement do hereby jointly and
individually agree to pay the sum of $185,000.00 of said
purchase price and no other costs or charges to the City in
the following manner:
a) Remi ttance of $ I () Ie 0 0 as a donation in reimbursement
of such acquisition by the City;
b)
$ J 7.S- Ol)O by assessment against and a lien upon the
real ~state owned' by each of the parties to this
Agreement and legally described on Exhibit B.
.
-2-
-
Each of the parcels described on Exhibit B shall be
assessed in equal proportion regardless of Lot size or
location on Hiawatha Avenue.
i
4. The assessment shall be for a term of 15 years,
bear interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum and
shall be certified to the Hennepin County Auditor by November
,3D, 1992 for inclusion on the 1993 real estate tax statement
of each such parcel.
Payment terms and prepayment terms
shall be as provided in Minnesota Statute 429 as follows:
a. The Homeowner of a property so assessed, may, at any
time prior to certification of the assessment or the
first installment thereof to the County Auditor, pay
the 'whole of the assessment with interest accrued to
the date of payment. No interest shall be charged if
the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the
adoption of the assessment.
.
b. The Homeowner may prepay the whole of said assessment
any time prior to November 15 of any year with interest
to December 31 of the payment year.
5. Each of the parties to this Agreement jointly and
individually in order to -induce the City to acquire the
property described on Exhibit A and implement the assessment
procedure do and hereby agree to expressly waive objection to
any irregularity with regard to the acquisition of the real
estate by the City which shall include but not be limited to
the following:
a) Waiver of right to a notice of assessment except and to
the extent notice of such assessment is provided for in
'this Agreement;
. ~..
.
b) Waiver of objection to such assessment by the parties
to be assessed:
c) Waiver of rights to appeal such assessment herein
agreed to:
-3-
Waiver of right to
provided for in
including but not
assessment.
object to the assessment levy
this Agreement upon any ground
limited to excessiveness of such
;
6. Each of the undersigned Homeowners for themselves,
their heirs and assigns hereby agree that the acquisition of
the prope~ty by the City is feasible, necessary and proper
for the prvtection and benefit of the community, health,
safety ,
welfare
and
betterment and that each of the
properties to be assessed hereunder shall be improved and
benefited by such acquisition.
7. It is the intent and aim of the City to maintain
and enhance the property as a nature area and manage the site
for passive use and enjoyment of the community with due
4It regard for preservation of trees in a natural setting.
8. Each Homeowner shall execute and deliver to City
the Consent of Assessment form attached as ExhibitC.
9. Association and Homeowners shall execute and
deliver this Agreement to the City on or before March 24,
1992 accompanied by the remittance set forth in Paragraph 3
a) for approval and execution by the City as soon as possible
thereafter.
The aforementioned date may be extended by
mutual consent of all parties.
10. The provisions of this Agreement shall govern over
any other contrary, term, condition or provision contained in
any prior agreement or understanding among the parties.
.
11. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of all parties hereto, their successors,
-4-
representatives and assigns iocludingwithout limitation, any
purchaser of anyone or more of the properties to be assessed
and described on Exhibit B.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this
Agreement to be executed 00 the date first written,8bove.
CITY OF ,HOPKINS ~
By r/..J~ ~ ~---r
Its~ . U
MINNEHAHA OAKS ASSOCIATION
By
~.~
. .~/:' .;triA. ""--
Its
.
HOMEOWNERS:
Bernardine Nelson
Bonnie Gilbert
Ronald Gi1bert
Lisa Benson
Neal Benson
Trina Munnings
~
-
~
Jeffrey Jordan
?1#
L/JUiUu 7YJc '
~Neff. ... ..
, . ~t. /}2CfIjZ
Larry MCUf~, ,
-5-
Marilyn Runquist
;
Douglas Runquist
Betty Carroll
Norma Glasgow
John Glasgow
Patricia Isaak
Vernon Isaak
Malora Carlson
.
Joey Ca~:Q ~
EdwaM-trom
, ,_~.~ ,-1~t-r-i
Irene,I,bsen . ' n f). .
~~
Kenneth Ibsen
Nancy Carroll
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument
this J 5lA day of Apr: I
the M~o,...
municipal corporation under
of the City.
was acknowledged before me
, 1992, by Nt.I.5."" 'O~ '
of the City of pk1ns, a
the laws of Minnesota, on behalf
.
(J2-r. ,-~-c 0-. .~
Not~rf~l~C /
-6-
Patricia J. Gisborne '
NOTARY PUBUC - MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My CQII1ltIIulon explM 0-1-93
.
.
.
/
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
,J
Strom
"
Irene-Ibsen
, Kenneth Ibsen
John Carroll,
Th~ foregoing A instrument
this 15 day of f<"':J
the JI\"T~r
municipal corporation under the
of ,the ,City.
, ,
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
, ) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The
,was . acknowled~edbefore me
, 1992, by. Nt~I'\'Bc~
of the City of Hop ins, a
laws of Minnesota, on behalf
, ,
. ' ..
.f7~jJ~
Notary Pub~ic ,~
Patricia ]; Gisborne
NOTARY PUBUC . MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY '
My commission eXpIres 0.1-93
this
the
Association,
Minnesota, on
foregoing instrument, was ~Cknowledged before,me
day of , 1992, by
of the Minnehaha Oaks
a nonprofit corporation under the laws of
behalf of Minnehaha Oaks,Assocfation.
,Notary Public
-6-
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
;
Th~ foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this I'i' <lay of mo.r-c. h. . 1992, by L o...r toy In '- J.J e (-' r:
the ,4-' r<. s ,dR_-..\..1- of the Minnehaha Oaks
Association, a nonprofit corporation under the laws of
Minnesota, on behalf of Minnehaha Oaks Association. '
S~~NNNI/\l\N"-\^,"lII .
~@, JOHN \'i, TE5BENKAMP I
~ .' NOTARY P~BLiC.M1NNESOTA
~ HENNE'P!t~ COUNTY
~ My CommiE'si!Jn Expires Nov, S, 1997
'-~VIJ\MN>./V\NWIN\NVv=
g~ W.. I~
Not ry Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was
this day of
Nelson.
acknowledged before me
. 1992 by Bernardine
.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
.. The foregoing
this day of
and Ronald Gilbert.
instrument was acknowledged before me
. 1992 by Bonnie Gilbert
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument
this day of
Neal Benson.
was acknowledged' before me
, 1992 by Lisa Benson and
.
Notary Public
-7-
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing
this day of
and Jeffrey Jordan.
instrument was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Trina Munnings
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) S5
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The~t foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this /8- day of md..f'G.k. , 1992 by Marie McNeff and
Larry McNeff.
IIM1J'-"WV...v.Mi'oAMrAV.MAN'JVv,^^"M/'.z
~~")., JO~!,iw.TEseE~lKAMP $ ~ n --r-~
~\~ r.OT.t..,,{ PUBliC-MINNESOTA ~ ~ W { ~
~ HENNfP!N COUNTY, ~ N. ota P, ublic .
~ My Commission 8:pires Nov. 6 1997~
",^"^,v.r~A/IN\N',^"^,,,,,JV"V:N\I\lV :.
4It STATE OF MINNESOTA}
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument
this day of
, ana Douglas Runquist.
was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Marilyn Runquist
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing
this day of
instrument was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Betty Carroll.
Notary Public
.
-8-
.
.
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) S5
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing
this day, of
and Vernon Isaak.
instrument was acknow1edged before me
,', 1992 by Patricia Isaak
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) S5
COUNTYO'F HENNEPIN)
The forego{ng instrument was acknowledged before me
this /'1 day of Pf;'; 1 ,,199,2 ,by Ma1.ora Carlson
and JOey Carlson.
~:=1!F N~k;,julf1.lJ4Jcf~ityA()
My t;Qmmlsslon expires 3-5-94'
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ,
) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing
this day,of
instrument was acknow~edged before me
, 1992 by Edward Strom.
Notary Pub1.i.c
'STATE OF MINNESOTA)'
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing
this day of
Kenneth Ibsen.
instrument was acknowledged before roe
, 1992 by Irene 'Ibsen and
Notary Public
-9-
, '
.
:.
j
J
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) S5
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
;
The foregoing instrument was
this day of
and John Glasgow.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) S5
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The "foregoing
this day of
and Vernon Isaak.
acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Norma Glasgow
Notary Public
instrument was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Patricia Isaak
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing
.this day of
and Joey Carlson.
Notary Public
instrument was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Malara Carlson
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) S5
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
Notary Public
this
Th~ foregoing instrument
I g't day of fno.,..(.. h
was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Edward Strom.
lIlN'Wll'NV\IIII.IVVttVlM"V/,.NVt,NI/II"...NVV1MlI
I@;:r~, JOHN W. TEB8Ei"lKP,MP ,
:.~ ' NOTA~Y P~BUC.M!NNESOT..\
H::NNi::?!N COUNTY
My Commission Expires Nev. 5, 1997
w .
Ok Lu.
No1tary Public
--~
/
-9-
.
.
The ~oregoing instrumenl:
this i S' day of nto. f"" h. ,
Kenneth Ibsen.
.NVV.NI,IY"",II/Vl/v'M'VIN\IIN\IIIVtIA/'MlIr
Iw~ JOHN W. TE88ENKAMP I
,. NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My Commission Expires Nov. 6..1997
w .
'STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) 55
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
was
acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Irene Ibsen and
~~ tu. T~
Nota Public
this
The foregoing
day of
instrument was acknowledged before me
, 1992 by Nancy Carroll.
Notary Public
-10-
EXHIBIT A
All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of Section 19, Township 117, Range 21, West of the
Fifth Principal Meridian, lying South of the State Highway
"':"''Number 7 , except the one hundred foot right-of -way of the
Great Northern Railway Company across said land, and except
that part thereof described as follows: Commencing at the
Southwest corner of said Quarter Quarter, thence North along'
the West line thereof to the Easterly right-of-way line of
the' present right-of-way of the Great Northern Railway,
thence Northeasterly along said Easterly right-of-way line to
the Southerly line of Trunk Highway #7 as built and operated
across said Quarter Quarter, thence Easterly along said
Southerly line 609.23 more or less to a point midway between
the intersections of said Southerly line with the East line
of said Quarter Quarter and the Easterly right-of-way line of
the Great Northern Railway; thence 1n a direct 11ne to a
point in the South line of said Quarter Quarter which 1s 810
feet distant measured West on said South line from the
Southeast corner thereof, thence West along said South 11ne
to point of beginning, and except that part embraced within
the plat of Ramsgate, and situate in Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
.
.
'.'
.
.
EXHIBIT B
1. Bernardine
Minnesota:
Nelson, 402 Hiawatha' Avenue, Hopkins,
That part of Lot 8 lying southwest of road as opened by
Document No. 347404, Lot 8, Block 1, Minnehaha Oaks
2. Bonnie and Ronald Gilbert, ~06 Hiawatha Avenue, Hopkins,
Minnesota:
That part of Lots 7 and 9 lying southeasterly of a line
running parallel with the northwesterly line of Lot 9 from a
point in the northeasterly line thereof distant 43 3/10 feet
southeasterly from most northerly corner thereof Block 1,
Minnehaha Oaks'
3. Lisa Benson and Nea+ Benson, 409 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minnesota:
Tract B Registered Land Surveyor #825
4. Trina Munnings and Jeffrey Jordan, 410 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minnesota:
That part of Lot 10 lying southeasterly of a line running
parallel with northwesterly line of Lot 10 and extension from
a point in the northeasterly line distant 88 feet
southeasterly from must northerly corner of Lot 10 and that
part of Lot 9 lying northwesterly of 8,11ne running parallel
with the northwesterly line of Lot 9 from a point in the
northeasterly line distant 43 3/10 feet southeasterly from
most northerly corner thereof and that part of Lot 7 lying
northwosterly of a line running parallel 'with the
northwesterly line of Lot 7 from a point in the southwesterly
line distant 43 3/10 feet southeasterly from most westerly
corner thereof and southwesterly of road as opened by
Document No. 347404 Block 1, Minnehaha Oaks
5. Marie McNeff and Larry McNeff, 413 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minnesota:
Tract A Registered Land Survey No. #825
6. Marilyn Runquist and Douglas Runquist, 418 Hiawatha
Avenue, Hopkins, Minnesota:
That part of
parallel with
a point in
southeasterly
Minnehaha Oaks
Lot 10 lying ~orthwesterly of 8 line running
northwesterly line of Lot 10 and extension from
the northeasterly line distant 88 feet
from most northerly corner of Lot 10, Block 1,
7. Betty Carroll, 425 Hiawatha Avenue, Hopkins, Minnesota:
~
Tract B Registered Land Survey #362
8. Norma, Glasgow and John Glasgow, 426 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minnesota:
Lot 11, Block 1, Minnehaha Oaks
9. patricia Isaak and Vernon Isaak, 434 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minn~sota:
.
Lot 12, Block 1, Minnehaha Oaks
10. Malara Carlson and Joey Carlson, 435 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minnesota:
Tract A Registered Land Su~ey #362
11. Edward Strom, 505 Hiawatha Avenue, Hopkins, Minnesota:
That part of Lots 2, 3 and 4 lying south of the line running
east at right angles from the west line of Lot 2 at a point
distant 90 feet south from the northwest corner thereof and
north of a line running east at right angles from the west
line of Lot 3 at a point distant 50 feet south from the
northwest corner thereof Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Minnehaha
Oaks
12. Irene Ibsen and Kenneth Ibsen, 511 Hiawatha Avenue,
Hopkins, Minnesota:
.
That Part of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 lying southwesterly of creek
south of a line running east at right angles from the west
line of Lot 1 at a point distant 10 feet north from the most
southerly corner thereof and north of a line running east at
right angles from the west line of Lot 2 at a point distant
90 feet south from the northwest c~rner thereof Block 1,
Minnehaha Oaks
41' 13. Nancy Carroll, 517 Hiawatha Avenue, Hopkins, Minnesota:
.
.
That
and
west
most
Oaks.
part of Lots 1, 2, and 3 lying southwesterly of creek
north of a line running east at right angles from the
line of Lot 1 at a point distant 10 feet north from the
southerly corner thereof except road Block 1, Minnehaha
/
. .
EXHtBIT C
WAIVER, BY PROPERTY OWNERS
r
, hereinafter called ~~e
he/she is' the owner. ,of
Minnesota-- more particularly
said property owner hereby' requests the City of Hopkins to make
. the arrangements necessary to:
Property owner hereby waives any right to notice or objection to
said improvement as provided in Chapter' 429 of the, Minnesota
statues and any other provisions of municipal for state law
providing for notice or objections. property owner understands
that for the foresaid work he/she will be assessed for all costs
. ~
JJlC"~e- .
.
witnesg c~r hands to this agree~ent t~at we have read ~~d
underst~~~is. agreement and consent thereto this '/7 ,
of /..-'l4?--1..G4. , / rt?4. · '
fully
day
~~ Y/J~
. . . - .-- n erty owner
'fj/CVu-U {J. P7c~
Prop y Owner
WITTNESSETH
~ 1i~v(JE7~
Witness
,.~~~~-'
Witness ~ ,
.
.
.
.
EXHtsIr c
WAr" .:...:., BY PROPE:?.TY m,jNZ?.5
=s:, ,e Cf 1'1,"J /0 'r ~ ,(! 4 j;) <f;o t7, her a i.--:af":;ar c:l.lled t=e
prop:r1:. oWIl.er'A s-ca-:es that he/she is the .owner. .of
/..f:] ~ - />~,).ik'? t/'~ E;opkins, ,Minnesota-- more partic.llarly
descrJ..bed as:
, . .
Said property owner hereby requests the city of Hopkins to make
.:'the arrangeme.?lts necessary to:
.
Property owner hereby waives any right'to notice or objection to
said b1prove!!lent as provided in c."1apter' 429 of the, Minnesota
stat"".les and any other provisions of mu..-licipal for state law
providing for notice or objections. Property owner underst~ds
that for the foresaid work he/she will be assessed fer all ccsts
i.::C''':== ad .
Wi~:le.ss C~=
~a~ds t= ~~~s a~ae=e=~ t~a~ ~a have
ag=ee:ent ~~d consent t~ere~o ~is
, lee? :P.. .
. '
day
--=..~., .,......
----.1.
=:a=- ar:c.
/1
under
of
'.
:.&" e a~~
---'--:-- - -:- ~ , propert:y Owner
.' ,
;1/0 I~ EO G ~
, Property Ow"Iler
WITTNESSETH
:'-~TZ;it, ff ;J; (1M
Wit."1ess T if V
I '
i
.......-.-..
Wit:less
.
.
.
.-
~
EXHIBIT C
w~ BY PROPERTY Q1ff41E?.s
f<~ + ~~ J~ , herei.:1af-=ar called t..~e
propercy, owner, s't:a-ces that he/she is the 'owner. .ot
6~/J-/~~~A'~ ~opkins, .ML~esota-- more parti~~larly
desc=i.bed as:
. '.
, . -
Said property, owner hereby' requests the City of Hopkins to make
..' .+~'tb.e a..-rangements nace.ss~~ to:
Property owner hereby waives any right to notice or objection to
said i.:nprove!D.ent as provided in c.."lapter' 429 of the. Minnesota
statues and any other provisions of mu..~icipal for state law,
providing for notice or obj ections. P=o:;Jerty ow-ne= unc.ersta=.ds
that for the foresaid work he/she will be assessed ~or all cos~s
i..~C"~=c. .
Wit~ess C~=. ha~ds t= t~~s ag==~=e~~ t=a~ we have
u.~derstand ~s agreement and ccnsent~~ere~o ~is
of a t~ , I Ii f 2- .
I<~L
~~
==.ac. ar:c.
/f
day
--=....., 1 1~.,p
.. ---.1
'.
J-1~
propert:y Owner
~~,
Property O'W"!ler
~
,//
.,1 /1
'.
.
.
~
'~-~
~~'
r----"
EXHIBIT C
WAr"1=-, BY PROP:::aTY OY-/""N:E?.s
:tJJ l<y:z yJ SJ;.6;ff... , her=ina=~a= called. t...":.e
proper:cy owner, s"t:a:t:es that he/ she is the 'owner"" of
...<0&- H(,3(V~.7k;, r E;opkins, Minnesota-- more partic.ilarly
desc:ibed as:
said property owner hereby"requests the city of Hopkins to make
,:"the arrange:ments necessary to:
Property'owner hereby waives any right to notice or objection to
said i::nprove1ent as provided in c...~apter. 429 of the. Minnesota
statues and any ctherprovisiens of mu...,icipal fer state law
providing for notice or cbj ec-:ions. Proper-=y owner underst2nds
that fer the fcresaid worl<: he/She will J::e assessed for all cos~s
L~c=:.d .
Wi~=ess C~= ca~~s t: ~~~s a~~=e=e~~ t~a~ ~e have
understa.~d this agre~ent and consent ~era~o ~~is
of lV.r~ I , I't't 'L
~=.=..c. a::c.
/7' 77;
:':::2.1..7
day
/a-t .
Z~ 'fti<
~
cr- ,".
propert:y
Owner
Propercy Ow"ner
--....'.
Witn