Memo- Hennepin Cty Public Works PropertyMemorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Copy: Steve Mielke, City Manager
From: kJim Kerrigan, Planning & Economic Development Director
Date: July 25, 1997
Subject: Hennepin County Public Works Property
JK07257A
PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION
II. OVERVIEW
PLANNING &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The purpose of this discussion is to review a revised plan that has been
submitted by SuperValu for redevelopment of both the Hennepin County Public
Works site and adjacent property. Based on the discussion, the Council needs
to decide how they wish to deal with this proposal and whether staff should
begin preparing a preliminary development agreement.
At the May 13 work session, SuperValu provided an overview of the
warehouse /office project they are interested in constructing on the Hennepin
County Public Works property. SuperValu has stated that they need to complete
this expansion in order to make their operation more efficient and meet
increased market demands.
Based on this discussion, the Council expressed an interest in working with
SuperValu to facilitate their project, but only if there were assurances that such a
project would ensure the future redevelopment of the 28 -acre SuperValu north
annex property. The Council concluded their discussion by requesting that staff
send a letter to SuperValu reiterating the need for the north annex property to
be part of the "deal" (see attached letter). The revised plan that has now been
submitted by SuperValu is in response to the Letter.
III. PRIMARY ISSUES TO CONSIDER
1. SuperValu Site Plan
The revised redevelopment plan that has been submitted to staff by SuperValu,
involves, in the short -term, construction of a warehouse building on the
Memo to Honorable Mayor and City Council, July 25, 1997 - Page 2
JK07257A.
Hennepin County property and, in the Tong -term, vacation of their north annex
operation with the moving of all their operations south of Excelsior Boulevard.
The specifics of this project would involve the following:
• Demolition of SuperValu's older building located just east of Washington
Street, which presently is occupied by their truck maintenance facility. Within
this area they would expand their existing freezer operation. In this area they
would also construct some additional off - street parking.
• Acquisition and removal of the industrial property located at the southwest
corner of Excelsior Boulevard and Highway 169 (building truss property).
Although SuperValu has not finalized how this property would be utilized,
discussions have indicated they would probably construct additional
warehousing space at a future date.
• Construction of an approximately 700,000 square -foot warehouse and 30,000
to 60,000 square -foot office on the Hennepin County Public Works property.
This building could be moved somewhat to the north with acquisition of the
property in this area.
• Construction of an approximately 90,000 square -foot addition to the
perishable warehouse building on the former Country Club warehouse
property. SuperValu would lease the property from the present owner.
• Vacation of the following streets:
• Sixth Avenue South from Fifth Street South, north to Third Street South
• Third Street southwest from Washington to its connection with Sixth
Avenue South
• Washington Street west of the SuperValu dry goods warehouse operation
• Construction of the following roadways:
• Just west of Highway 169 south from Excelsior Boulevard to Second
Avenue South
• Extension of Milwaukee west of Highway 169
• SuperValu would agree to vacate the north annex property four years after
completion of construction on the Hennepin County property. This property
would then be placed on the market for sale, with the City having either an
option or first right of refusal.
Memo to Honorable Mayor and City Council, July 25, 1997 - Page 3
JK07257A
• Construction to be phased, with the first building erected on the Hennepin
County property.
2. Issues to Consider
In reviewing the SuperValu proposal, the Council should consider the following
issues:
• The project as proposed, when fully constructed, would probably generate
more property taxes than most of the other projects that were previously
considered for this site as part of the RFP process.
• If SuperValu cannot accommodate their future growth needs in Hopkins, they
may be forced to look at relocating all or a portion of their operation out of
Hopkins. If the Hopkins operation were closed, the result would be a loss of
1,230 jobs for the City, of which 133 are filled by Hopkins residents.
• The Park Valley neighborhood appears to be supportive of SuperValu
locating on this property. In the past, SuperValu has done a good job of
buffering their development from residential properties and dealing with traffic
issues and concerns.
• SuperValu has stated that with the new addition they would be able to
accommodate all truck traffic on -site. This would remove the long line of
trucks that are usually on Milwaukee Street each day waiting to be loaded.
• In a meeting with Hennepin County, they stated they would be willing to work
with the City on an option agreement to try and facilitate the SuperValu
project. The specific terms of the option agreement would need to be
negotiated.
• Availability of the 28 -acre north annex property would allow for a
redevelopment project to take place at a future date in somewhat the same
scale that has been envisioned previously by the Council for the County
Public Works property. Tax increment or some other type of public
assistance may be necessary to actually facilitate redevelopment on the north
annex property.
• The project would facilitate the removal of some older, blighted buildings.
• The specifics of financing both the public and private improvements have not
yet been addressed. SuperValu has stated it may be necessary to utilize tax
increment to assist with project implementation.
Memo to Honorable Mayor and City Council, July 25, 1997 - Page 4
• The specific size of the buiding within the different places of construction need
to be more clearly defined. This would be done by Super Valu once a
preliminary development agreement was approved.
JK07257A
3. Traffic Issues
Benshoof and Associates has reviewed the project from a traffic perspective.
(Attached is a letter detailing their comments.) Although they see a number of
issues that will need to be addressed, their feeling is that there is nothing that
should prevent the project from moving forward to the next step if the Council so
desires.
4. Future Actions
If the Council is willing to try to facilitate the SuperValu project, the next steps
would involve the following:
• Prepare a preliminary development agreement detailing the basic parameters
of the project. Such an agreement does not obligate the HRA to undertake
the project, but does allow completion of certain actions in order to determine
the appropriateness of entering a development agreement. Consideration of
such a document could be on the August 5 HRA agenda. It is proposed this
agreement would require SuperValu to complete the following:
• Detail the scope of project (Le. building sizes, street improvements,
landscaping, etc.)
• Payment of $5,000 administrative fee, with agreement to provide
reimbursement for City costs related to the project
• Timetable for completing various improvements
• Budget and source of funding for public and private improvements
• Review the project with the Zoning and Planning Commission on a
concept basis allowing for neighborhood input.
• Undertake negotiations with owners of property adjacent to the County site
concerning acquisition or leasing.
Besides the above, City staff would undertake negotiations on an option
agreement with Hennepin County.
If the Council does not wish to proceed with the SuperValu proposal, the
following options would be available for the redevelopment of the County Public
Works property:
Memo to Honorable Mayor and City Council, July 25, 1997 - Page 5
• Allow the County to sell the property through its bid process. They would
probably undertake this process in late 1997 or early in 1998. Staff feels that,
based on discussion with developers, there will be substantial interest in the
site for construction of a 'high quality" development. Under this option, it is
important that the City have the necessary land -use controls in place (i.e.,
business park zoning).
• Work with a developer on a specific project which meets Council objectives
for this property, besides the developers that responded to staff as part of the
RFP process. Proposals for redevelopment of the County property have
recently been submitted by Stan Koch and Sons Trucking, Inc.
IV. CONCLUSION
Based on the discussion staff has had with SuperValu, they seem very
committed in moving forward with their proposed project. They have stated that
they clearly need to undertake this construction in order for their Hopkins
operation to meet customer demands. If they are unable to build the facility in
Hopkins, it will be constructed on other property that they presently have under
option.
If the Council wishes to pursue the SuperValu proposal, there needs to be a
decision at some time in the not too distant future so that negotiations can be
completed with the County prior to when they would need to undertake a public
marketing of the public works site.
V. ATTACHMENTS
JK07257A
• SuperValu's revised site plan
• Letter from SuperValu
• Letter from Stan Koch
• Letter to Gary Zimmerman dated 5/16/97
• Memo from Benshoof and Associates
• Project timetable prepared by City staff
May 16, 1997
City of gCopk,ins Office of the .Mayor
1010 First Street South Jfopkins, fk4.9V 55343 -7573 • phone: 612 -935 -8474 • 'Fax 612 -935 -1834
Mr. Gary Zimmerman
SuperValu Stores Inc.
101 Jefferson Avenue South
Hopkins, MN 55343
Re SuperValu Proposal, Hennepin County Public Works Property,
City of Hopkins
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
On May 13, 1997 the Hopkins City Council held a work session to review and
discuss the SuperValu proposal to construct a warehouse /office facility on the
current 42 acre Hennepin County public works property in Hopkins. I am writing
to inform you that there was a strong consensus on the Council that the proposal
in its current form is unacceptable. Following the presentation by the SuperValu
staff, the Council reviewed the proposal and determined that a key to winning
support from the Hopkins City Council rested on the redevelopment of the 28
acre north annex property.
As a bit of background, the City's comprehensive plan proposes a business park
for the 42 acre Hennepin County property. The business park zoning district,
which is being considered by the City, would house primarily office showroom
uses with a smaller percentage of warehousing uses. We found great developer
interest in the Hennepin County property for this type of development. We have
also found that the property could allow for a significant influx of employees and
development investment beyond a warehousing project such as SuperValu is
proposing. When SuperValu re- entered the picture by indicating its renewed
interest in the Hennepin County property, the Council indicated a willingness to
consider that proposal, predicated on an ability to place a business park on the
28 acre north annex property. SuperValu has now taken the position that the 28
acre parcel is needed for flexibility within the long term plans for SuperValu, and
therefore, if the Council is to achieve its goal of building a business park in the
community, it is left with only the Hennepin County property as its option.
The Council has indicated a willingness to work with SuperValu on the Hennepin
County property so that SuperValu can achieve its goals, but is looking for
SuperValu to help the City to achieve its goal by making the 28 acre parcel
available for redevelopment within a reasonable time period.
.1n Employes
May 16, 1997
Page 2
We understand the needs of SuperValu to be flexible and to keep its options
open for its future growth, and that the 28 acre parcel represents that flexibility.
If there is a possibility of redeveloping the 28 acres and meeting the needs of
SuperValu at the same time, we would be to that suggestion.
The Council has stated that they need to receive your response on whether
SuperValu is willing to reconsider its proposal by no later than July 1, 1997.
This time constraint is necessary in order to allow the Council time to look at
other development options for the county property if we are unable to come to
terms with SuperValu.
I would enjoy meeting with you to discuss this issue further, and to look for
mutually beneficial answers to the needs of both the city and SuperValu.
Sincerely,
C-0
Charles D. Redepenning
Mayor
Copy: Members of the City Council
Steven C. Mielke, City Manager
Jim Kerrigan, Economic Development Director
Lloyd Johnson, SuperValu
Debra Carlson, SuperValu
Jerry Steiner, City Attorney
John Vector, SuperValu
Reuben Johnson, SuperValu
Joe DeWitt, SuperValu
ziimnermansupervalu
r) I
col i
...a
r)
§
9
w
O
9
1 I
;10,
in
NORTHERN REGION
101 JEFFERSON AVENUE SOUTH
HOPKINS, MN. 55343
a ca" "
P„< 07 u 97
u.0 r . T OO'
EP �- E!)�" MEU3�
ARCHITECTURE t ENGINEERING
65„ R� ««lo DRWG x $OTQ ,00. mEx PRAxec �,. ���.
lEP XO NE: (6 7T) 914-59 tT /S. 0 - FAX (61 T 9 -58
7EtEPNE: (9 -AX (6) 9.-5850
�,.t�Ra
,.. P PRELIMINARY �r
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
41:4 Ion . Irons mar.
aa, N
CONCEPT SITE PLAN
SUPERVALU REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
ACTIVITIES
PRELIMINARY APPROVALS
- Council work session, revised concept plan
- SuperValu submits application for Z & P concept review
- Council authorizes preparation of preliminary development
agreement
Z & P concept review
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
- Council approval
City undertake negotiations with County
- Execution and SuperValu payment of initial $5,000 fee to
cover City costs and agreement to reimburse for additional
City costs as incurred
- Application by City to MNDOT /county /railroad for access /crossing
- SuperValu undertakes negotiation for purchase /lease agreement
- Land use review, preparation of design standards
- SuperValu meeting with neighborhood
- SuperValu elevations prepared for Phase 1, refine timetable
and minimum improvements for various construction phases.
Prepare project budget detailing source of funds.
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
- Council approval
- City executes option agreement with Hennepin County- -
SuperValu reimburses City for option payment
- Execution and SuperValu payment of initial $5,000 fee to
cover City costs and agreement to reimburse for additional
City costs as incurred
- SuperValu executes necessary purchase option /lease
agreements
- Approval by MNDOT /county /railroad of access /crossing
- CUP, street vacation approval, comprehensive plan revision
- Approval of building plan Phase I and project financing
- Assign option agreement to SuperValu
ESTIMATED
COMPLETION DATES
August 12, 1997
August 13, 1997
August 19, 1997
August 26, 1997
September 2, 1997
September 5, 1997
September 5, 1997
September 5, 1997
September 5, 1997
September 30, 1997
September 30, 1997
October 30, 1997
January 5, 1998
January 8, 1997
January 8, 1998
February 28, 1998
February 28, 1998
February 28, 1998
May 1998
June 1998
John Vegter Vice President
Logistics
S PERIALU
Northern Region
PO Box 1451
Minneapolis, MN 55440
612 932 4372
March 3, 1997
James D. Kerrigan
City of Hopkins
Planning & Economic Development Director
1010 First Street South
Hopkins, MN 55343
Re: SUPERVALU Long Range Facility Planning Schedule
Dear Jim,
The following is a proposed schedule of events if SUPERVALU were successful in
purchasing the Hennepin County Public Works property. These dates are tentative and
subject to change, however, they are our best projections todate of how the project might
come together. If you have any questions please call me at 932 -4372.
Obtain control of site August, 1997
Begin site and facility design January, 1998
Bid construction work July, 1998
Begin construction October, 1998
Place North Annex Property on market for sale January, 1999
Complete construction June, 1999
Start-up DC operations in new facility July, 1999
Phase out North Annex operations August 4 October, 1999
North Annex vacated November, 1999
Sincerely,
John Vegter
cc: Deb Carlson
Lloyd Johnson
Mike Daly
Joe DeWit
STANI1a)Ch & SONS
TRUCKING, INC.
5871 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 • (612) 593 -1300
US WATS 800 -445 -0079 MN WATS 800 - 228 -0176
June 26, 1997
Honorable Mayor Charles Redepenning
RE/ COUNTY PROPERTY
This letter will attempt to give you and the City Council a brief
overlay of our proposal for the purchase of the 43 acres of land,
known as the County Shop Property.
As we have discussed previously, we would be willing to pay the
price of $4,300,000.00 and we in turn, would give back to the city
approximately 15 to 18 acres.
Our other proposal that we would like for you to consider is that
if we can have all of the 43 acres in order for us to bring more of
our operation to Hopkins, we would do the following:
#1. We would pay $4,300,000.00 for the property and we would
use all 43 acres for our operation and bring with approximately 400
jobs.
#2. We would in turn make a donation of $1,000,000.00 to the
City of Hopkins to be used as the City Council sees fit with no
strings attached other, than we would be able to use the pl-cimises
for basically the same purpose as it is now being used.
We would appreciate if you would advise me if this type of an offer
would be of interest to the City.
Needless to say, we are very interested in moving to the Hopkins
area and would look forward to working with the City Council as
well as being a good neighbor in your community.
4
Sinc r ly yours,
Stan Koc
Koch
TRUCKING, INC.
5871 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 • (612) 593 -1300
CARRIER PROFILE
CORPORATE OFFICERS: Dave Koch - President
OPERATION & DISPATCH: Pat Pettey - E. V. P.
SALES & MARKETING :
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
CONTRACT RIGHTS:
PRIMARY TRAFFIC LANES:
TYPE OF TRAFFIC HANDLED:
WAREHOUSE CAPABILITY:
EQUIPMENT:
John Tidquist - Vice President
Jim O'Brien - Director National Accounts
Corporate Office :
Shop
Fax
Toll -Free
(612) 593.-11300
(612) 623 -3220
(612) 593 -1314
(800) 445 -0079
To operate as a contract hauler to transport
general commodities (except classes A & B
explosives) between all points in the 48
contiguous United States and the District of
Columbia.
Central States, Southeast, Southwest and West
United States.
Truck Loads on a drop trailer or live load basis with
stop -off. Capability to handle LTL orders.
150,000 square feet of storage space available for
general commodities or food product.
BANK REFERENCE: National City Bank - Minneapolis, MN
Trailers:
1200 53' x 102" Air Ride Vans
Tractors:
400 Company Drivers
TRAILERS SPO'i"i ON DEMAND EQUIPMENT POOLS AT MINNEAPOLIS. MN..
CHICAGO IL, AND LOS ANGELES, CA., ARDMORE, OK., MCALLEN, TX.,
EL PASO, TX., STAUNTON, VA., AND FINDLAY, OH.
STANIL &SONS
TRUCKING, INC.
5871 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 • (612) 593 -1300
US WATS 800 -445 -0079 MN WATS 800-228-0176
STAN KOCH & SONS TEZTJ G ,
(K- S- `=' - - )
The company started in the mid 1950's as a manufactures representative of chain, cable,
rope, twine and other related products. Stan Koch started and managed this business and
included his son's into the business as the company expanded nationwide.
The company entered into the transportation industry in the mid 1970's as a common
carrier. The main purpose at that time was to handle their own product outbound from
Cosmos, MN and return with exempt commodities.
In 1980 the Koch family saw an opportunity after deregulation of trucking to expand the
truck operation. Since that time, the company has continued to grow and remains
committed to service and reliability to our customers.
We have the latest technology for E.D.I. for our customers. We are a financially strong
company for continuing growth.
Our equipment has satellite tracking. All of our drivers are company drivers. Our fleet
age is about two (2) years old. All of our trailers are 53' air ride. We try to maintain
one of the newest and cleanest fleets nationwide.
Our success and growth has been developed from great customer support. We thank our
customers for their help and continued support as we look to the future.
STAN IS 1 ch & SONS
TRUCKING, INC.
5871 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 • (612) 593 -1300
US WATS 800 -445 -0079 MN WATS 800 - 228 -0176
HISTORY
STAN KOCH & SONS TRUCKING,
(K - S -T-S- )
The company started in the mid 1950's as a manufactures representative of chain, cable,
rope, twine and other related products. Stan Koch started and managed this business and
included his son's into the business as the company expanded nationwide.
The company entered into the transportation industry in the mid 1970's as a common
carrier. The main purpose at that time was to handle their own product outbound from
Cosmos, MN and return with exempt commodities.
In 1980 the Koch family saw an opportunity after deregulation of trucking to expand the
truck operation. Since that time, the company has continued to grow and remains
committed to service and reliability to our customers.
We have the latest technology for E.D.I. for our customers. We are afinancially strong
company for continuing growth.
Our equipment has satellite tracking. All of our drivers are company drivers. Our f fleet
age is about two (2) years old. All of our trailers are 53' air ride. We try to maintain
one of the newest and cleanest, fleets nationwide.
Our success and growth has been developed from great customer support. We thank our
customers for their help and continued support as we look to the future.
a"-- •
0 11-
O
O 1 =01
ki)
z
W
0
0
0
0
z
0
a
a
Pim
INC
�f1
•
Flom
Pim
C
T
0,
0
CY
N
m
A
0
m
CO)
n �
4
X
A
z
a
;3 A alviv7
A
lg Z ‘171
GO ; • imm
Z D Z
61 1.0
0 V � � Q Q Q eso
� W Q .
‘m) I:
O
is ;A Ism
C
O
Z 40 I•
N
V N
pia
F
W
tin
W
'O O IC
r-- . -
o F-
N N.-. 0
0
N
00
O w w
. 0 Q ,U
et z W
cn 2 cn
• • •
0
O
f
0
1-
_ ' ' 1-
p N •
O
co
z
a
J
lq? BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS
7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDINA, MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9858 / FAX (612) 832 -9564
August 8, 1997
MEMORANDUM
PURPOSE
INITIAL REVIEW
DR
TO: Deborah Carlson, Supervalu, Inc.
Jim Kerrigan, City of opkins
FROM: James A. Benshoo and Peter A. Hultgren P4
REFER TO FILE: 97 -61
RE: Review of Traffic Feasibility for Preliminary Supervalu Development Plan
Supervalu, Inc. is planning to construct new office and warehouse facilities in Hopkins.
The proposed new facilities would be located west of Highway 169 and south of Excelsior
Boulevard (County Road 3). Supervalu intends to eliminate operations at its current north
annex site, located east of Highway 169 and north of Excelsior Boulevard, within four
years after occupancy of these new facilities. The present facilities east of Highway 169
and south of Excelsior Boulevard will remain in place.
City of Hopkins staff requested that we conduct a comprehensive overview of the
preliminary development plan to determine whether it is feasible from a traffic standpoint
and to identify all pertinent traffic issues. This memorandum provides our overview
comments and identifies those traffic issues that need to be analyzed further in order to
develop effective solutions.
Our initial review of the development plan identified four topics which we determined
were important to address:
a. Impacts on surrounding residential neighborhoods.
b. Impacts on street intersections.
c. Impacts on transit and trails.
d. Accessibility for Supervalu.
Ms. Carlson and Mr. Kerrigan
Our review focuses on these four topics and identifies the basic traffic implications for
each. In the conclusions portion of this memorandum we identify traffic issues that need
further investigation during the next step in planning for this development.
IMPACTS ON SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
There are three residential neighborhoods which could potentially be affected by the
current Supervalu development plans. These three neighborhoods are the Park Valley
neighborhood located south of 5th Street and west of Highway 169, the Harley Hopkins
neighborhood located east of Monroe Avenue and south of Excelsior Boulevard, and the
Edina neighborhood located south of 3rd Street and east of Highway 169. Comments on
the impacts for each neighborhood follow.
Park Valley Neighborhood
-2- August 8, 1997
This neighborhood is situated immediately south of the Supervalu site. The current
Supervalu site plan would improve neighborhood access to /from the north by way of the
proposed road that fronts the west side of Highway 169 between the east end of 5th Street
and Excelsior Boulevard. The awkward "T "- intersection of 5th Avenue/Railroad
Boulevard /3rd Street would be eliminated.
The current plan would eliminate the existing truck route through 5th and 6th Avenues to
Excelsior Boulevard. This would impact truck trips to or from the Cornerstone Business
Park. Another issue is that a "dead end" situation would be created for trucks at the
existing intersection of 5th Street S. and 6th Avenue S. Trucks approaching this
intersection from the west on 5th Street would be unable to proceed in any direction
because 6th Avenue to the north would be closed and trucks are prohibited from using 5th
Street to the east. Two alternatives for resolving this issue are: a) require all trucks to
and from the Cornerstone Business Park to use 1 lth Avenue or b) allow trucks to use 5th
Street east to the new west frontage road and 2nd Avenue.
Supervalu truck traffic would be limited to 1 lth Avenue, 5th Avenue, and the west
frontage road. There would be no Supervalu truck traffic on any neighborhood streets,
including 5th Street.
Traffic volumes likely would increase on 5th Street S., particularly east of 6th Avenue S.
Two reasons for this expected increase are:
a) Some trips between the Highway 169/Excelsior Boulevard interchange and the
Westbrook area will use 5th Street S. and the new west frontage road because 6th
Avenue will be closed south of Excelsior Boulevard and because this route will
seem more attractive to some motorists than using 1 lth Avenue.
Ms. Carlson and Mr. Kerrigan
b) The plan shows that 5th Street S. would be a straight westerly extension of the
new west frontage road. Under the current concept, 2nd Avenue S. would "T"
into the 5th Street S./West Frontage Road route.
One option to reduce the traffic increases due to the second above factor would be to
realign the intersection of 5th Street S., West Frontage Road, and 2nd Avenue S. so that
the West Frontage Road is continuous with 2nd Avenue S.
Harley Hopkins Neighborhood
This neighborhood is located immediately east of the existing Supervalu south annex. We
foresee no increase in Supervalu truck and employee traffic through the neighborhood
resulting from the current Supervalu plan. Potential exists for some increase in Milwaukee
Street traffic through the Monroe Avenue intersection. This increase would result from
Park Valley and Supervalu employee traffic using Milwaukee Street and the west frontage
road to bypass the two traffic signals on Excelsior Boulevard at the Highway 169 east and
west ramp intersections.
Edina Neighborhood
IMPACTS ON STREET INTERSECTIONS
1 lth Avenue and Excelsior Boulevard
-3- August 8, 1997
This neighborhood is located immediately south of the present Supervalu south annex.
The Supervalu plan would improve neighborhood access to /from the north via 3rd Street
under Highway 169 and the new south leg of the west ramp intersection. This is a shorter,
more direct route than the current 5th Avenue access to Excelsior Boulevard.
The Supervalu plan would confine truck and employee traffic to Milwaukee Street and the
area west of Highway 169. Supervalu truck traffic would be diverted from the current
Washington Avenue /3rd Street intersection area to Milwaukee Street and its westward
extension. Neighborhood residents would benefit from this diversion when traveling
to /from the west on 3rd Street. We foresee no increase in through traffic in this
neighborhood as a consequence of the current Supervalu plan.
There are six intersections along Excelsior Boulevard which could potentially be affected
by the current Supervalu development plans. Comments on the impacts for each
intersection follow.
The plan could cause some increase in traffic at this intersection due to the elimination of
the 5th Avenue /6th Avenue connection to Excelsior Boulevard for the Cornerstone
Business Park and the Westbrook neighborhood located along 11th Avenue south of 6th
Street. However, there could be a reduction in traffic as a portion of existing traffic
Ms. Carlson and Mr. Kerrigan
Highway 169 West Ramp and Excelsior Boulevard
between 1 l th Avenue and Excelsior Boulevard to /from the east would be diverted to the
west ramp intersection via 5th Street. Further study is needed to determine the net effect
of these two diversions on intersection volumes and performance.
5th Avenue and Excelsior Boulevard
-4- August 8, 1997
The plan would divert existing traffic to /from the south either to the west ramp
intersection or the 11th Avenue intersection. New Supervalu traffic to /from the south,
especially truck traffic to /from the Supervalu loading docks, would be added to this
intersection. Further study is needed to determine the specific effects.
There would be significant increases in traffic and changes in traffic patterns resulting from
the construction of the south leg of this intersection. Traffic to /from the south would be
added as a result of Supervalu traffic generation and the diversion of neighborhood trips
and other traffic.
There are constraints placed on the geometry of this intersection in the current plan. Two
points of concern pertain to the westbound left turn lane and stacking distance south of
the intersection.
For the westbound left turn lane on Excelsior Boulevard, about 290 feet are available
between the current westbound stop line at this intersection and the bridge pier on the
west edge of the Highway 169 overpass. Subtracting out a typical left turn lane taper of
120 feet leaves only 170 feet for deceleration and stacking. This distance is quite short.
Currently, there is about 170 feet of separation between the south pavement edge of
Excelsior Boulevard and the pair of railroad tracks paralleling Excelsior Boulevard. The
proposed separation between these tracks and the north pavement edge of the Milwaukee
Street extension would be about 70 feet. Three vehicle stacking issues pertain to these
separation distances:
a) For northbound traffic between Excelsior Boulevard and the railroad tracks,
sufficient stacking distance must be provided so that vehicles in the end of queues
do not extend onto the railroad tracks while waiting at the west ramp signal.
b) For southbound traffic between Excelsior Boulevard and the railroad tracks,
sufficient stacking distance must be provided so that vehicles in the end of queues
do not block Excelsior Boulevard while waiting for a crossing train.
c) For southbound traffic between the railroad tracks and Milwaukee Street,
sufficient stacking distance must be provided so that vehicles in the end of queues
do not extend onto the railroad tracks while waiting to enter the Milwaukee Street
intersection.
Ms. Carlson and Mr. Kerrigan 5 August 8, 1997
Milwaukee Street and Excelsior Boulevard
Whether sufficient stacking space would be available for the three queues needs to be
determined. To resolve these issues, traffic forecasts will need to be determined to
account for the diversion of 5th Avenue traffic and Supervalu trip generation.
Highway 169 East Ramp and Excelsior Boulevard
We do not foresee that the proposed Supervalu plan would have any major impact on this
intersection.
Currently, this intersection provides access only between Milwaukee Street and Excelsior
Boulevard to /from the east. This situation hinders access for the Supervalu development
and forces more traffic to use the west ramp intersection on Excelsior Boulevard.
Traffic volumes on Milwaukee Street likely would increase because some motorists
traveling to and from the east on Excelsior Boulevard would use this route in order to
avoid the traffic signals at the west and east ramp intersections on Excelsior Boulevard.
This traffic increase applies to both Supervalu trips to /from the area west of Highway 169
and other trips to /from the south which use 5th Street and the west frontage road. This
increase could cause capacity or safety difficulties at the intersection of Excelsior
Boulevard and Milwaukee Street.
Currently, some westbound Excelsior Boulevard traffic uses Milwaukee Street to bypass
railroad gates in the down position when a train crosses Excelsior Boulevard. Westbound
traffic bypassing the gates will at times use the eastbound lanes on Excelsior Boulevard to
turn left to Milwaukee Street, creating an unsafe condition. This difficult situation would
continue under the current development plans.
St. Louis Street and Excelsior Boulevard
The current plan would not alter the existing intersection. Limitations due to the current
partial access will become more serious when redevelopment plans are prepared for the
north annex site.
IMPACT ON TRANSIT AND TRAILS
The County trail system and Metro Transit have plans for the depot site located east of
Highway 169 and south of Excelsior Boulevard. The County would like to establish the
depot as a trail head for trails to the south and west. Metro Transit would like to establish
a bus transit hub at the depot site. Both uses require improved parking and public
facilities, and could operate in tandem with each other. Metro Transit plans to provide
parking east and west of the depot. Parking would extend westward under Highway 169.
Ms. Carlson and Mr. Kerrigan
Metro Transit would desire to have full access for this parking lot and bus operations at
the west ramp intersection on Excelsior Boulevard, but such access probably is not
feasible due to the high volumes expected to use the West Frontage Road and the close
spacing with the railroad tracks.
A trail crossing of the west frontage road would need to be established at an intersection
crosswalk location either on the south leg of the west ramp intersection or on the north leg
of the west frontage road/Milwaukee Street extension intersection.
ACCESSIBILITY FOR SUPERVALU
-6- August 8, 1997
The Supervalu plan would provide a high degree of mobility between Supervalu facilities
on either side of Highway 169. Effective access opportunities are provided for trucks and
employees.
Truck traffic
For Supervalu operations west of Highway 169, truck traffic would be concentrated at the
5th Avenue/Excelsior Boulevard intersection. For Supervalu operations east of Highway
169, truck traffic would be concentrated at the west ramp intersection and the Milwaukee
Street intersection. Truck traffic between Supervalu buildings within the development
would be confined to the internal roads on the site and on Milwaukee Street and its
extension under Highway 169, thus keeping such internal truck movements off Excelsior
Boulevard and out of the surrounding neighborhoods.
The Supervalu plan would provide a large truck trailer parking area near the loading
docks. This area would be accessible directly from 5th Avenue and the Milwaukee Street
extension. Sufficient area would be provided so that all Supervalu truck staging
operations would occur on -site, thus avoiding any truck staging operations on Milwaukee
Street or any other public street.
Employee traffic
Employee traffic would be concentrated at the west ramp intersection, the Milwaukee
Street intersection, along the west frontage road to the employee lot, and along
Milwaukee Street. We expect that employee traffic will not affect neighborhoods.
CONCLUSIONS
The current Supervalu plan is compatible with the improvement plans for Excelsior
Boulevard that have been approved for initial construction. Supervalu's plan retains
flexibility for future improvements on Excelsior Boulevard, including the ability to
Ms. Carlson and Mr. Kerrigan
-7- August 8, 1997
construct a four leg Jackson Avenue/Excelsior Boulevard intersection and possibly to
connect Milwaukee Street with this intersection.
Based on this initial comprehensive traffic review of Supervalu's plans, we conclude that
the proposed concept is promising and merits further consideration. We have identified
the following issues that require further examination:
• The west frontage road intersections with Excelsior Boulevard and Milwaukee Street.
— Provision of a westbound left turn lane at the west ramp intersection.
— The overall level of service at the west ramp intersection.
- The adequacy of stacking space for southbound and northbound traffic
between Excelsior Boulevard and Milwaukee Street.
- The type of traffic control and the resulting level of service at the west frontage
road and Milwaukee Street intersection.
- The feasibility to accommodate transit access on the west frontage road south
of Excelsior Boulevard.
• The Milwaukee Street and Excelsior Boulevard intersection.
- The increased difficulties in the current plan due to increased left turns from the
east on Excelsior Boulevard to Milwaukee Street and increased right turns from
Milwaukee Street to the east on Excelsior Boulevard.
— The increased needs for full access between Milwaukee Street and Excelsior
Boulevard.
• Traffic effects on 5th Street and 2nd Avenue.
— Needs to preserve adequate truck access for the Cornerstone Business Park,
including the possibility of allowing truck traffic on 5th Street between 6th
Avenue and the west frontage road, and on 2nd Avenue south of 5th Street.
- The geometric layout of the west frontage road /2nd Avenue /5th Street
intersection.