VII.1. Presentation: End-of-Trip Facilities Plan and Multimodal Transportation Update
CITY OF HOPKINS
Memorandum
To: Planning and Zoning Commission Members
From: Kurt Howard, Planner
Date: February 25, 2025
Subject: End-of-Trip Facilities Plan and Multimodal Transportation Update
_____________________________________________________________________
PURPOSE
The purpose of this item is to present information to and seek feedback from the
Planning and Zoning Commission on the recently completed End-of-Trip Facilities Plan.
Staff will also present updates on additional multimodal transportation initiatives that are
currently underway or under consideration.
INFORMATION
With the help $15,000 grant awarded to the City of Hopkins by Hennepin County’s
Active Living Program, the City contracted with Toole Design to complete an End-of-Trip
Facilities Plan. The Plan is proposed to serve as a guiding document to help implement
strategic improvements over time for the provision of high-quality end-of-trip facilities,
such as bike racks and secure storage lockers, that meet the needs of an emerging
diversity of active transportation modes. The Plan considers all modes of active
transportation, including all types of bicycles (e.g. traditional, electric assist, cargo,
adaptive, recumbent etc.), personal and shared mobility scooters, skateboards, roller
blades, and any other physically active way that community members may travel to and
within Hopkins. The Plan’s recommendations are informed by an evaluation of existing
end-of-trip facilities, a review of best practices, and two community engagement events
which sought to understand the community’s needs, opportunities, and barriers that
end-of-trip facilities present to the use of active modes of transportation.
In addition to the End-of-Trip Facilities Plan, staff will also present updates on a number
of additional multimodal transportation initiatives that are currently underway or under
consideration.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
• Draft Hopkins End-of-Trip Facilities Plan
Planning & Economic
Development
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES
PLAN
2024
End-of-Trip Facility
Definitions
The following definitions related to end-of-trip facilities are provided
for the purpose of this plan; therefore, terms may vary when
reviewing other sources.
Micromobility –A small, low-speed, human-or electric-powered
transportation device, including bicycles, scooters, electric-assist
bicycles, electric scooters, and other small, lightweight, wheeled
conveyances.
End-of-Trip Facilities (EOTF) –Spaces that provide support
amenities for active transportation use. They are often located in
commercial buildings, offices, public transit hubs, and other public
areas.
2
End-of-Trip Facility
Definitions
Active Transportation – Any self-propelled, human-powered mode of transportation, such as walking, running,
skateboarding, scootering or bicycling.
Bicycle Facilities – A general term denoting provision to accommodate or encourage bicycling, including
bikeways, bicycle boulevards, bicycle detection, in addition to parking and storage facilities.
First- and Last-Mile Connections – A general term for facilities designed to help people access transit stops and
stations, particularly to and from their residence.
3
Introduction
Micromobility as a commuting option is increasing in popularity, especially as the
number of trails and bike paths in Hopkins and the surrounding region increases. Non -
car transportation modes help lower greenhouse gas impacts from the transportation
sector, contributes to a more sustainable community, and facilitates integrating physical
activity in daily routines. However, commuters may find it difficult to store their bikes, fix
a flat tire, or freshen up once they get where they are going. The Hopkins End-of-Trip
Facilities Plan was completed thanks to funding from Hennepin County's 2023 Active
Living Technical Assistance Program, provided through the Minnesota Department of
Health's Statewide Health Improvement Partnership (SHIP).
By providing comprehensive facilities that address these needs, the City of Hopkins can
make micromobility a more comfortable and convenient transportation option. These
facilities should be provided at private and publicly accessible buildings, parks, and
other destinations, as well as wherever vehicle parking is required. They should also be
considered in roadway, streetscape, and transit projects. Planning micromobility parking
for new and existing retrofit scenarios can make it possible to provide well-designed,
convenient, secure, and accessible parking in a cost-effective manner.
This end-of-trip facilities plan identifies the types of facilities that encourage
micromobility travel in the community. The plan will further address considerations for
accommodating a wide range of micromobility devices – which differ in physical
dimensions and operating characteristics.
4
What’s in this plan?
1.0 Introduction
Summary of the purpose and need of planning & designing for end-of-trip facilities.
2.0 Existing Conditions
Overview of the existing parking environment in Downtown Hopkins, including
inventory of existing parking assets, and major trip generator destinations
3.0 Engagement
Overview and summaries of online / in-person community engagement efforts.
4.0 End-of-Trip Facility Best Practice Design Considerations
Types of end-of-trip facilities, along with differentiating characteristics, appropriate use
cases, and how to best implement them.
5.0 Branding and Wayfinding
Review existing active transportation branding & wayfinding and best practice
recommendations for branding and wayfinding of end-of-trip facilities.
6.0 Recommendations
Facility, policy, and program recommendations tailored to Downtown Hopkins
identified during the review of the existing parking environment, best practices,
community engagement, and deploying the guidelines.
5
Introduction
Forms and Benefits
INCLUSIVE PARKING
A successful end-of-trip facility
plan will need to go beyond
providing parking for standard
bicycles. This guide provides
parking solutions for all types of
micromobility devices to serve a
variety of users.
What are some forms of micromobility
devices?
Micromobility devices can vary considerably depending on their size, type, and the needs of people who use them. This in turns allow a wide range of users – regardless of age or ability – to travel without a vehicle. By providing parking for all micromobility devices, active transportation can be possible for citizens in Hopkins and visitors alike.
6
Introduction
Forms and Benefits
Why invest in end-of-trip facilities?
The development of end-of-trip facilities also encourages and supports active
transportation uses for multiple purposes. This leads to benefits for
employers, schools, businesses, and other organizations.
▪Improve public health. Commuting with active transportation to work
potentially improves employee mental and physical health, leading to
lowered healthcare costs for employers.
▪Reduce parking costs. Parking for micromobility devices accommodates
more commuters using less space, leading to lower costs per vehicle.
▪Increase productivity. Reducing time lost to traffic congestion increases
productivity for employers.
▪Advance sustainability and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By
increasing access to active transportation opportunities, Hopkins can
demonstrate a commitment to creating a healthier environment for the
community and employees alike.
▪Support local infrastructure. Promotes the use of active transportation
to Downtown Hopkins businesses and services, and to transit, such as
the future Green Line LRT stations.
7
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES PLAN
EXISTING CONDITIONS
8
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Method
The project team produced a baseline micromobility
parking inventory in Downtown Hopkins.
The baseline inventory used fieldwork to identify the
location of micromobility parking to document
geospatial locations and the number of micromobility
parking spaces available at each location.
9
Total Parking Spaces
Available
There are approximately 110
micromobility parking racks
within the public right-of-way
or within parking structures in
the Downtown Hopkins area
surveyed. Including the
capacity of each rack type,
this equates to 220
micromobility parking spaces
available.
10
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES PLAN
ENGAGEMENT
11
Introduction
Community Engagement
Method
To ensure the success of the plan meeting the needs of
the City of Hopkins, the project team engaged
community members.
To reach community members, the project team used a
mix of in-person and online engagement during the
summer and fall of 2024. In-person engagement
consisted of two (2) pop-up events in the City of
Hopkins. The project team summarized key takeaways
from these events in an engagement summary memo.
12
Hopkins Farmers Market
Pop-Up Event Summary
Event Date: Saturday, August 31, 2024 (8 AM – 12 PM)
How many people attended: 100+ visitors to the Farmers Market. Our table had at least 20
interactions
Summary of common themes:
•Consider bike corrals (in-street micromobility parking facilities)
•Shady Oaks LRT Station- blank slate so good to hear EOTF is being considered
•Bear Cave Brewing has good bike parking and storage
•Add more bike parking to Mainstreet
•High-quality secure bike parking is requested at LRT stations
•Consider adding a high-capacity, access-controlled micromobility parking facility at
Tonka Cycle & Ski
•Consider app-based access to link transit and secure micromobility parking
•Consider retroreflective markings to assist with navigation on micromobility devices
•Account for access, functionality, and proper space to park a micromobility device
13
11 St S Railroad Bridge
Pop-Up Event Summary
Event Date: Friday, September 20, 2024 (3 PM – 5 PM)
How many people attended: Lots of pedestrian, bike, and vehicle traffic. Our
table had at least 10 interactions.
Summary of common themes:
•In general, add more micromobility parking and support for end-of-trip
facilities
•Consider using decorative rack elements for branding/wayfinding component.
Minnehaha Ave cited as a good example
•Add more bike rack elements
•Pair EOTF with e-bike charging stations
•Consider EOTF with proposed new development and retro fit development
scenarios
•Access-controlled facilities would be a great idea, especially for ebikes
14
Online Survey
Summary
Event Date: Online survey open from August to October 2024
Summary of common themes:
•A moderate variety of micromobility devices are used in
Downtown Hopkins. Respondents are mostly using conventional
bikes and e-bikes, with a few cargo bikes and e-scooters in the
mix.
•There seems to be a wide variety of end-of-trip facility users.
The frequency of visits that respondents indicated is evenly
distributed between multiple times a week and just once a month.
•More often than not, respondents indicated there are challenges
that prevent greater use of micromobility to get downtown.
Those related to EOTF include:
o Inadequate supply of facilities
o Inadequate distribution of facilities
o A couple instances where the facilities supplied don't meet
the needs of the micro-mobility device being used
•Most people are willing to park farther away for high-quality
facilities. In particular, respondents are willing to travel for:
o Enhanced security
▪Bike room/shelters
▪Security/surveillance
▪Restrooms
▪Water supply
•Reasons for coming downtown are primarily commercial in nature
•Maintaining line of sight to micro-mobility device is a common driver
for the end-of-trip facilities that respondents choose to use.
•The most common locations where respondents said more end-of-trip
facilities are needed are Driskill's grocery store, 8th & Mainstreet,
and LRT stations.
•Only 12% of respondents said they never have to lock their micro-
mobility device to something other than a bike rack, and over half said
they need to do so frequently
•Increasing the overall supply of bike racks and providing bike
parking for special events are the most common things identified as
not currently working well.15
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES PLAN
BEST PRACTICES
16
The following identifies different end-of-trip
facilities, along with characteristics, appropriate
use cases, and how to best implement them.
▪Lock-up // Parking Facilities
▪Clean-up // Showering and Changing Facilities
▪Tune-up // Repair Facilities
End-of-Trip
Best Practice Guidance
17
Lock Up /// Parking Facilities
Provide secure micromobility parking at convenient locations
18
Introduction
Dedicated parking facilities for active transportation modes are essential to end-of-trip facilities design. This section will explain
various features and types of parking facilities, along with important considerations for implementing the right type of parking
elements. Refer to Appendix A.2 Micromobility Parking Guidelines for additional information.
Benefits of Micromobility Parking
Parking plays an important role in supporting active transportation
programs. Commuters must have convenient places to park or store
their devices during or after commutes. Developing parking strategies for
a micromobility program that effectively and efficiently meets all
commuter needs can further encourage micromobility commuting. Such
programs will think about locations, racks, and storage needs, use
cases, cost specifications, and ordinances, all of which should
ultimately benefit the Hopkins community.
Types of Facilities
There are two main types of parking facilities prominent in existing end-
of-trip facilities: short-term and long-term parking. This section will offer
design guidance, appropriate use cases, and implementation
considerations for both forms of parking.
Example short term parking (left) and access-controlled, long-term parking (right)
19
Short-Term Parking
Short term parking should be designed to meet the needs
of people visiting but not staying. This is typically for
commuters and visitors who will be at their destination for
2-6 hours. These facilities should also be visible and easy
to use, enhancing the user experience even for a short
period of time.
Example of a in-street corral Example of inverted-U style rack
20
Short-Term Parking
Design Considerations
The following are elements to consider when designing short-term
parking facilities:
Element Considerations
Location •Place facility near the entrance it is serving. 50’ or
less is a good benchmark
•Survey commuters for desired parking locations
Security •All racks must be sturdy and well-anchored
•Placing facility in areas with visibility and public
lighting improves security by deterring theft and
vandalism
•Consider designs with protection against weather
elements to encourage year-round use
Quantity •There may be ordinances governing bike parking
quantity
•APBP’s full Bicycle Parking Guidelines is a resource
for determining needed capacity
•Parking demand will develop as quality parking
appears
Implementation Guidance
On-street parking facilities can be a solution if space is limited or to increase the
availability of short-term parking spaces. Place corrals along high-volume travel corridors,
ideally at street corners for increased visibility and access or corridors with existing or
planned bikeways. Corrals commonly replace an auto parking stall and should be 18-20
feet long by 8-10 feet wide, with a minimum 2.5-foot buffer from the curb. Coordinate with
local businesses to determine the most convenient and beneficial placement. On-street
parking should include the following elements:
Element Considerations
Racks
Racks mounted on rails are preferred to surface-mounted racks on asphalt
which can be more easily removed and are at higher risk for theft. Angle racks
where possible to increase the buffer between bicycles and vehicular traffic.
Racks can be oriented parallel to the curb to accommodate cargo bicycles and
attachments.
Delineation
Include a visual and/or physical separation around the parking area to be easily
identified by bicyclists and motorists. Use a combination of bright paint, flex or
delineator posts, rubber curbs, bollards, or other visual solutions
Signage Place signs along the travel route and at the parking area to indicate available
bicycle parking.
21
Long-Term Parking
Long-Term parking facilities are typically designed for
commuters, residents, and other users who need parking
for more than 2 hours. By providing additional security and
protection against weather elements, these facilities make
parking for longer hours more feasible and attractive. They
are ideal for addressing micromobility needs at
workplaces, residences, transit facilities, amongst other
locations.
Example of a long-term parking facility Example of a bicycle cage
22
Long-Term Parking
Design Considerations
The following are elements to consider when designing long-term parking facilities:
Element Considerations
Location •Appropriate placement varies with context.
•Physical security is more important than public visibility.
•Coordinate with destinations served by the facility to establish
signage for guiding users.
Security •Placing facility in a well-lit area improves security by deterring
theft and vandalism
•Control access to the facility with locks, keys, smart cards, and
other technologies.
•Long-term bike parking facilities can be used by an individual
locking up their device by itself or by groups that agree to share a
given facility to lock multiple devices.
Density •Demand for parking density may be at odds with designs that
prioritize security.
•APBP Essentials of Bike provides guidance for choosing high-
density racks.
Element Considerations
Variety in
devices
•Long-term parking facilities should
anticipate the presence of a variety of
bicycles and accessories, including—
depending on context—recumbents, trailers,
children’s bikes, long-tails, e-bikes, cargo
bikes, adaptive bikes, scooters, skateboards,
and others.
•Consider outlets for e-bike battery charging.
Access •Facility should be placed no lower than the
first level below grade.
•If the facility must be installed upstairs,
consider providing ramps, elevators or
stairways with a bicycle channel. Age and
ability of commuters should also be
considered.
23
Additional Considerations
E-Bikes, Adaptive Bikes, Cargo Bikes, and Scooters
Providing parking for non-standard bikes is becoming more
common as the types of bikes evolve and modernize to meet
different demands. This will look like adding charging ports in
spaces for e-bikes, and inclusive parking for adaptive bikes
and bicyclists with disabilities, as well as cargo bikes.
When designing for non-standard bikes, account for
accessibility concerns such as step-free access, non-slip
surfaces, accessible signages and doors, amongst other
factors.
When designing for e-bikes, consider the weight of the bike,
compounded security risks, and access to charging stations.
Parking at Special Events
At festivals, concerts, fairs, and other large events, the City should partner with organizers to provide temporary
micromobility parking. This can ease traffic congestion and parking issues traditionally associated with commuting
to these events.
Some important considerations:
•Locate parking at highly visible, easy to access points while also avoiding walking traffic or crowded areas.
•Place parking within barriers with a controlled entrance and exit to deter excessive traffic, theft, and vandalism.
Accommodating Shared Micromobility
Shared micromobility refers to a network of
shared vehicles that are spread across a
community to be accessed by all people. The
following are considerations for integrating
shared micromobility networks into the parking
system:
•Coordinate with the network operator on a
parking management plan.
•Deter users from parking outside of parking
facilities or permitted areas.
•Designate parking locations so users
properly park micromobility devices.
24
Clean Up /// Shower & Changing Facilities
Offer showers and changing facilities for micromobility users
25
Introduction
For micromobility users, changing and shower facilities can make commuting by active transportation a
more realistic and attractive option. These facilities can be adapted to work in conjunction with parking
facilities and provide an appropriate level of service for various use cases. This section details different
components of these end-of-trip facilities and provides some design considerations.
Benefits of Clean Up Facilities
Providing changing rooms and shower facilities can
encourage people to ride longer distances to work,
businesses, and other locations. These facilities may
also have the potential to serve non-commuters, such
as people who walk, roll, or use trails.
Types of Facilities
This section will mainly expand on two types of
facilities: personal lockers, and changing and
showering facilities.
26
Personal Lockers
Personal lockers provide commuters with a secure space to store riding
gears, a change of clothes, and other supplies. These facilities can exist
alongside changing and showering facilities but can also be located near
parking facilities to encourage use.
Element Considerations
Location •Place facility near parking facilities, or in a dedicated
building nearby.
•Facility can potentially be used by recreational users
such as joggers and walkers.
Security •Regularly monitor lockers to maintain cleanliness.
•Include strong locking mechanisms to ensure safety.
Size •Consider a variety of locker sizes to accommodate
different user needs.
•Provide at least one locker per long-term parking
space.
Design Guidelines
27
Changing & Showering Facilities
Shower facilities can be integral to accommodate employees
who commute or recreational facility users such as cyclists
and joggers. While more resource-intensive and costly when
compared to standalone locker facilities, they can be helpful
for employers and other professional institutions to support
active transportation.
Element Considerations
Location •Place facility near parking facilities or in
proximity to the destinations they serve.
Security •Regularly monitor changing and shower
facilities to maintain cleanliness.
•Include strong locking mechanisms to
ensure facilities are secure and lockable.
Availability •Provide at least one shower for the first
five long-term parking spaces on-site and
an additional shower per 10 subsequent
spaces.
Design Guidelines
Implementation Considerations
The City can require or encourage these facilities through
regulations and partnerships. This can also be done as part of
a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program.
A room with white cabinets and shelves
Description automatically generated
28
Tune Up /// Repair Facilities
Provide basic maintenance tools for micromobility users
29
Introduction and Considerations
Tire punctures or loose bolts make it challenging or impossible to operate a micromobility device
safely. Repair stations, tools, or even vending machines can allow users to do minor maintenance or
repairs to continue their travel with minimal interruptions.
Category Feature
Bicycle maintenance Bicycle pumps
Tire repair kits
Hanger arms to lift bicycles off
the ground
Additional bicycle repair tools
Features available at repair facilities include, but are not
limited to:
Element Considerations
Location •Place repair station near parking
facilities in highly visible and well-
lit location.
Security •Use durable materials, such as
galvanized or stainless steel to
help repair stations withstand
wear and tear.
•Include strong mechanism to
ensure safety.
Size •Provide cover so users can work
on their equipment during
inclement weather.
Design Guidelines
30
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES PLAN
BRANDING AND WAYFINDING
31
Background
Purpose of branding and wayfinding for end-of-
trip facilities
▪Provide confidence in navigating routes and
finding destinations
▪Promotes safety and comfort of using bicycle
and pedestrian infrastructure and facilities
▪Gives users the confidence to extend their trip
distance
▪Reduces confusion at junctions
▪Makes end-of-trip facilities and destinations
more accessible for all members of the
community
32
Best Practices
Summary of National and State Guidance
Color
The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) uses “assigned”
colors that covey specific meanings to roadway users, such as red (stop).
Standard colors prohibited for use on wayfinding signs include red, orange,
yellow, purple, fluorescent yellow-green.
Visibility and Visual Accessibility
Standards for lettering on signs ensures that the intended users are able to
see and process the information on signs easily, typically at a distance and
while in movement. To ensure this visibility, the Standard Highway Signs
book, a supplement to the MUTCD, sets the sign design standards for
lettering size and spacing.
Signs must meet character and font size requirements consistent with their
intended user (bicycles, pedestrians, or drivers), and travel speeds. There
must be a high level of contrast between letters and background.
Placement
The MUTCD instructs that signs should be placed 2 feet laterally from the
edge of the roadway but allows for the engineer’s judgment of safety, while
the Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) requires a clear
pedestrian access route, and the ability of people with disabilities to navigate
spaces with mobility devices.
Spectrum of MUTCD Compliance for Wayfinding Signs
ADA Clearance Guidelines
33
Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
General branding and wayfinding
▪Hopkins has an existing sign family for vehicular
scale wayfinding downtown that incorporates
city logo and colors
▪Existing wayfinding and other streetscape
features embody the historic design elements
Wayfinding should connect:
▪EOTF
▪SW LRT stations
▪Local and regional trails
▪Important Hopkins destinations (downtown, The
Artery, Shady Oak Lake Beach)
34
Wayfinding Principles
Refer to Appendix A.3 Branding and Wayfinding Guidelines for additional information.
Keep it Simple
Information should be clear, legible, and simple enough to be understood by a wide audience.
Be Consistent
Signs and markings should have common styles, fonts, colors, icons, materials, and placement.
Design for Inexperience
Wayfinding systems should be designed for new or infrequent users.
Be Inclusive
Signs that consider the needs of people with vision disabilities, or people with limited English
proficiency.
Consider End of Trip
The branding and wayfinding system should be designed to guide users through the end of their
trip.
35
Goals/Objectives
Objectives
▪Enhance trail connections and points of
entry along paths
▪Guide people to end-of-trip facilities and
destinations
▪Clearly define and identify end-of-trip
facility locations
▪Design for all users and various modes of
travel
▪Employ diverse wayfinding strategies
▪Create coordinated and consistent sign
family
The goal of the EOTF Wayfinding
Guidelines is to establish a
wayfinding system that guides
users through the end of their trip
and enhances the experience of
people traveling to and through
Hopkins.
36
Recommended Wayfinding
Sign Types
▪Route ID: trail or street name identification signage
▪End of Trip Facility ID: landmark and/or signage that communicates the type of facility and location
▪Gateway: signage, marking, or feature that indicates the entry point to Hopkins, neighborhoods (such as
downtown), or other area of significance
▪Symbols: Cyclist/Pedestrian symbols to indicate target users and facility type symbols
▪Decision Signs: points users in the direction of nearby destinations and end of trip facilities.
▪System or Area Map: at trailheads, complex intersections, stations, and areas of co-located end of trip
facilities
▪Mile Marker: can be integrated into other signs, such as Route ID, along routes/trails.
▪Instructional: signage that communicates how to use a facility, contact information, the benefits of
bicycling, or other signage that encourages use by being highly noticeable, appealing, or approachable, etc.
▪Regulatory: behavioral instructions, restrictions for use, hours of operations, etc.
37
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES PLAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
38
Recommendations Objective
▪To assist City of Hopkins staff with steps to
implement and prepare cost estimates for
implementation of recommendations from the
end-of-trip facilities plan.
▪Identify micromobility parking facility types and
corresponding cost opinions for parking
facilities at recommended locations, informed
by the standards presented in the Plan.
▪Present policy and program recommendations
for improving the active transportation
approach.
39
Recommendations Overview
Recommendations
When planning for end-of-trip facilities, consider the following recommendations to support active
transportation. This section provides a broad range of recommendations to improve access, ease of use, safety,
and support for active transportation users. These micromobility end-of-trip facility recommendations have
been prepared to help the City of Hopkins apply a consistent approach to accommodating existing and growing
micromobility needs in Downtown Hopkins.
Facility Types
With a wide range of active transportation users traveling to and from Downtown Hopkins each day, the
proposed micromobility facility types and locations are according to site’s characteristics. Four key
micromobility facility types were developed for Downtown Hopkins to meet the range of needs of active
transportation users.
40
Recommendation:
Active Commuter Hub
Active Commuter Hubs provide a one-stop shop for
long-term micromobility commuters. Active
Commuter Hubs are distributed to provide
convenient, secure, and well-appointed facilities for
people who will be on-site for several hours or more.
Active Commuter Hubs may be located within
parking structures, free-standing structures, or in
buildings that have exterior access.
Recommended Location: Municipal Parking Ramp
41
Active Commuter Hub
Facility Details/Checklist
Intended Users •Active transportation commuters
Length of Stay •Short-Term (2-6 hours)
•Long-Term (6+ hours)
•Overnight
Priority
Amenities:
•Personal lockers to accommodate at least 25% of total parking
supply (unless located within building with additional
shower/locker facilities)
•At least 5% of total parking supply spaced extra wide (to
accommodate bikes at least 8.5 feet long)
•Bike repair station
•Intermittent and signed outlets for e-bike charging
•High-visibility, exterior branded signage
•Clear on-site wayfinding to/from enclosure, especially when
shared with motor vehicles
•On-site educational signage and resources
Security
Features:
•Secure rack styles
•Access-controlled
•Conspicuous closed-circuit video signage
•Extra bright lighting
•Enclosed within durable, tamper-proof exterior materials
Intended Users •Active transportation commuters
Optional
Amenities:
•Bench
•Parts vending machine
•On-site showers
Location
Features
•Exterior access provided
•Located on the ground floor
42
Active Commuter Hub
Cost Opinion
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NOTES
Locker 2 EA $460 $920 1 unit accommodates 3
lockers.
Inverted U-Rack 1 EA $500 $500 1 unit accommodates 2
spaces.
Two-Tier with Assist 12 EA $3,000 $36,000 1 unit accommodates 4
spaces.
Repair / Pump Station 1 EA $2,000 $2,000
Bench 1 EA $600 $600
Prefabricated Facility 1 EA $86,780 $86,780
Approx. 20’ x 24’. Includes
door lock hardware and card
reader
Security Camera 2 EA $250 $500
SUBTOTAL = $127,300
5% MOBILIZATION = $ 6,365
20% DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING =$ 25,460
30% CONTINGENCY =$ 38,190
TOTAL = $197,315 (2024 dollars)
▪Assumes an approximate 20’ x 24’
facility
▪Accommodates 50 parking spaces
43
Recommendation:
Mobility Rooms
Mobility Rooms provide secure, long-term micromobility
parking for specific building populations. These locations
can be access-restricted to people who use a specific
building on a regular, long-term basis. These locations
may be co-located with end-of-trip amenities.
Recommended Locations: Center for the Arts, City
Hall/Police Department, Residential Developments
44
Mobility Rooms
Facility Details/Checklist
Intended Users •Active transportation users within specific buildings
Length of Stay •Short-Term (2-6 hours)
•Long-Term (6+ hours)
•Overnight
Location
Features
•Located on ground floor; If ground floor is not possible, locate
wheel channels along the side of the stairway, wayfinding to
elevators and bike room must be provided.
Security
Features:
•Secure rack styles
•Pre-approved and location-restricted badge access
•Conspicuous closed-circuit video
Priority
Amenities:
•Personal lockers to accommodate at least 10% of total parking
supply (unless located within building with additional locker
facilities or a housing building)
•Bike repair station
•Intermittent and signed outlets for e-bike charging
•On-site educational signage and resources
•Access to showers/lockers within building
Optional
Amenities:
•Bench
•Bike parts vending machine
45
Mobility Rooms
Cost Opinion
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NOTES
Locker 1 EA $460 $460 1 unit accommodates 3
lockers
Two-Tier with Assist 3 EA $3,000 $9,000 1 unit accommodates 4
spaces.
Repair / Pump Station 1 EA $2,000 $2,000
Security Camera 1 EA $250 $250
SUBTOTAL = $11,710
5% MOBILIZATION = $ 586
20% DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING =$ 2,342
30% CONTINGENCY =$ 3,513
TOTAL = $18,151 (2024 dollars)
▪Assumes an approximate 8’ x 14’
facility
▪Accommodates 12 parking spaces
46
Recommendation:
Mobility Nodes
Mobility Nodes provide a concentrated supply of
bike/micromobility parking within high-foot traffic areas and close
to Downtown Hopkins activity centers. These locations are highly
convenient for a large range of users, mostly rely on foot traffic to
self-enforce security, and may be co-located with weather-resistant
end-of-trip amenities. These locations are well-suited within close
proximity of other transportation facilities, such as shuttle/transit
stops and designed shared micromobility parking areas. Mobility
nodes may serve just one building or a cluster of buildings if
primary entrances to the buildings are proximate.
Recommended Locations: Activity Center, METRO Green Line LRT
Stations (3), Transit Stations, the Artery Corridor, Downtown Park
47
Mobility Nodes
Facility Details/Checklist
Intended Users •All
Length of Stay •Short-Term (2-6 hours)
Location
Features
•Located within high foot traffic areas
•Located within 200 feet of major activity/destination centers
•Ideally co-located with other mobility amenities, such as
shuttle/transit stops and bikeshare stations
Security
Features:
•Secure rack styles
•Lockers (Smart)
•Natural surveillance within high-foot traffic areas
Priority
Amenities:
•Weather protection via shelter or building overhang for 25% of
total parking supply (for Nodes with greater than 40 spaces)
•Bike repair station
•Free-standing or shelter-mounted educational resources
Optional
Amenities:
•Weather protection via shelter or building overhang (for Nodes
with less than 40 spaces)
48
Mobility Nodes
Cost Opinion
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NOTES
Shelter 1 EA $9,000 $9,000
Approx. 7’ x 13’ prefab
structure. 1 unit
accommodates 8 spaces
Inverted U-Rack 8 EA $250 $2,000 1 unit accommodates 2
spaces.
Repair / Pump Station 1 EA $2,000 $2,000
SUBTOTAL = $13,000
5% MOBILIZATION = $ 650
20% DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING =$ 2,600
30% CONTINGENCY =$ 3,900
TOTAL = $20,150 (2024 dollars)
▪Assumes an approximate 7’ x 13’
facility
▪Accommodates 8 parking spaces
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NOTES
Locker (Smart)1 EA $8,000 $8,000
Approx. 5’ x 7’ locker
assembly
1 unit accommodates 1
space.
Repair / Pump Station 1 EA $2,000 $2,000
SUBTOTAL = $10,000
5% MOBILIZATION = $ 500
20% DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING =$ 2,000
30% CONTINGENCY =$ 3,000
TOTAL = $15,500 (2024 dollars)
▪Assumes an approximate 5’ x 7’
facility
▪Accommodates 1 parking spaces
1
2
49
Recommendation:
Visitor Spaces
Visitor Spaces provide a place within 50 feet of all major
building entrances for a person to secure their personal
micromobility device. Visitor spaces include parking
locations within the public right-of-way. Partner with local
businesses to repurpose on-street parking with a bike
corral. If multiple public entrances serve the same building,
visitor spaces should be distributed and provided across
entrances.
Recommended Locations: Downtown Core, Downtown
Park, Mainstreet
50
Visitor Spaces
Facility Details/Checklist
Intended Users •All
Length of Stay •Short-Term (2-6 hours)
Location
Features
•Located within 50 feet of all major building
entrances
Security
Features:
•Secure rack styles
51
Visitor Spaces
Cost Opinion
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NOTES
Inverted U-Rack 1 EA $250 $250 1 unit accommodates 2
spaces.
SUBTOTAL = $250
5% MOBILIZATION = $13
20% DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING =$50
30% CONTINGENCY =$75
TOTAL = $388 (2024 dollars)
▪Assumes minimum 72” x 24” footprint
▪Accommodates 2 parking spaces
DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT NOTES
Corral 1 EA $3,000 $3,000 1 unit accommodates 14
spaces.
SUBTOTAL = $3,000
5% MOBILIZATION = $150
20% DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING =$600
30% CONTINGENCY =$900
TOTAL = $4,650 (2024 dollars)
▪Assumes minimum 18’ x 8’ footprint
▪Accommodates 14 parking spaces
1
2
52
DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE ASSUMPTIONS/NOTES
Locker EA $460 1 unit = 3 lockers.
Inverted U-Rack EA $250 1 unit accommodates 2 spaces.
Corral EA $3,000 1 unit accommodates 14 spaces.
Locker (Smart)EA $8,000 1 unit accommodates 1 spaces.
Two-tier with Assist EA $3,000 1 unit accommodates 4 spaces.
Repair / Pump Station EA $2,000
Bench EA $600
Shelter EA $9,000
Security Camera EA $200
Standard Items and Unit Costs
General Assumptions and Exclusions:
1.Unit prices are based on 2024 vendor unit costs, using the most recent available data from this time period.
2.Unit prices are not assumed to include shipping, site preparation, assembly, or installation. It is recommended to reference manufacturers specifications for all
site preparation, assembly, and installation techniques.
3.The opinion does not include environmental permitting, easement, or property acquisition.
4.The opinion does not include construction administration and inspection services.
5.The opinion does not include public outreach, funding planning, or client management services.
6.It is recommended that products are galvanized finish to protect from the elements.
The opinions of probable construction cost presented in this document were developed by identifying pay items and establishin g quantities based on assumptions for
facility size. Additional pay items have been assigned approximate lump sum prices based on a percentage of the anticipated c onstruction cost. Preliminary cost
opinions include a 30% contingency to cover items that are undefined or are typically unknown prior to final design. Unit cos ts are based on 2024 dollars and were
assigned based on historical cost data from common vendors. This cost opinion does not include permitting, inspection, or construction management; escalation; or
the cost for ongoing maintenance. This cost opinion is provided for the Client’s information, and is based on the design professional’s recent experience, adjusted for
factors known at the time of preparation. Toole Design Group, LLC has no control over the cost of labor and material, competitive bidding, or market conditions; and
makes no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy of the opinion as compared to actual bids or cost to the Client.
53
Policy and Program
Recommendations
Recommendations
The recommendations draw upon the needs identified during the
review of existing conditions, best practice review, and public
engagement. They are designed to work together to make using
active transportation a comfortable, enjoyable, and safe
experience. Recommendations aim to:
▪Encourage or require new construction and redevelopment to
include micromobility parking.
▪Require proportionate micromobility parking to vehicle parking
present in new developments.
▪To “jump start” the availability of parking at existing
destinations, many cities have allocated funds to purchase
bulk quantities of micromobility racks and then sell them at
cost to existing businesses and property owners.
54
Policy and Program
Recommendations
•Update zoning to offer parking credits for employers who have
or proposed to have changing, showers, or locker facilities.
•Develop incentives for existing businesses. Area businesses
that pro-actively install changing facilities can be given
recognition by each community or even supported through a
city grant program that provides small matching grants to
businesses that are considering adding changing facilities.
•Collaborate with Access Hopkins to implement future end-of-
trip facilities.
•Update the micromobility parking inventory every two years.
•Adopting a policy that requires events which draw over 100
participants to provide micromobility parking.
55
END-OF-TRIP FACILITIES PLAN
APPENDIX
56
Appendix
This section provides additional resources and
information related to the work of this end-of-trip
facilities plan.
A.1 – Community Engagement Survey Results
A.2 – Micromobility Parking Guidelines
A.3 – Branding and Wayfinding Guidelines
57