Memo- Social Service Funding-Feedback on Proposed Dept FundingMemorandum
Office of the City Manager
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager
Date: September 4, 1998
Subject: Social Service Funding— Feedback on Proposed Department
Funding
At the August Work Session, the City Council directed the staff to review a method of
allocating funds to social service organizations, based upon department budgeting
requests. In light of that discussion, the department heads have reviewed various
pieces of information and are ready to provide feedback to the Council.
• Should the Council choose to determine funding based upon department
review and prioritization followed by a request for funding, the departments
indicated that it was both feasible to allocate funds in that manner, and
additionally, that several of those organizations that have received funding in
the past, would receive department requests for funding this year.
• Some of the areas in which the city has funded in the past, have not been
identified as department programs or goals, and therefore, would not be
requested for funding. Others may be appropriate to suggest to other
organizations to fund.
• The department heads thought it appropriate to suggest to the Council that it
may be appropriate to provide greater notice to the organizations by providing
partial or full funding for 1999, and weaning the organizations off city funding
after 1999.
A policy would need to be developed on how to handle requests for funding,
since the requests usually go initially to the Council instead of to
departments.
Based upon these comments, I would offer the following comments concerning each
individual request.
• Child's Play Theatre Company
Child's Play's request has been for general operating support. It may be
more appropriate to request that either the operations board from the Hopkins
Center for the Arts or the joint Recreation board develop a programming
Page 2
option for the community, with Child's Play Theatre Company being a
potential contractor for that service. The City of Minnetonka also provides
funding to Child's Play Theatre Company, and they may also wish to divert
the general operating support to a more focused city program approach with
funding of that specific program.
• West Wind Concert Band of Hopkins
The primary purpose of this support is for community promotions. There
does not appear to be a specific program within the city budget for that effort,
but it is a legitimate use of community funds. It was suggested by the Council
that in lieu of a direct payment by the city to the band, that a donation of time
at the Center for the Arts may be of greater or equal value.
• Hopkins Area Arts Association
HAAA's funding has also been for general operating support. There is no
department who is specifically in charge of funding arts promotion and
community arts interaction, other than the Hopkins Center for the Arts. This
funding request may be best funneled in their direction to determine whether
or not the Hopkins Center for the Arts wishes to include such an item in their
budget.
• Sojourner Intervention Project
The Police Department indicated that this is an important component of their
ability to deal with domestic violence. They expressed support and a desire
to include this funding in their budget request.
• Senior Community Services
Staff wishes to further investigate this funding request, but it may be
appropriate to include at the Hopkins Activity Center, funding for a specific
targeted program as part of their budgeting process. Additional information is
needed before the staff can fully advise on this issue.
• West Suburban Mediation Center
Many departments expressed a desire to see this service provided within the
City of Hopkins. It seemed most appropriate to provide this funding through
the Police Department, since the majority of referrals come from the PD.
• Vail Place
Vail Place does provide some specific programs for the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority at Dow Towers. The HRA may wish to include this
item in their budget request for a specified program on a contract basis.
• Teens Alone Inc.
The Police Department indicated that there were a variety of sources
available to provide services similarly to Teens Alone. They likely would not
Page 3
request funding for this organization, as long as those other resources are
available.
• Family Resource Center
The housing personnel, as well as the Police Department, utilize and refer
individuals to the Resource Center on a regular basis. Staff would
recommend continued support of the Family Resource Center, based upon
those needs. The specific department to which the request would lie, may fall
primarily in the area of housing, although other areas would also be looked
at.
In general, many of those service organizations to which the city has funded the
organization, have provided services deemed important by the departments. Should
the Council wish to continue directing this process towards the departments, we would
consider altering our budget requests to include contracting for various services. It was
stated to the department heads that the funding would switch from the current funding
source, to the departments' fund, to not take away from existing resources.
Please contact me if you have additional questions concerning this item prior to the
work session.
Mayorccsocialservice
1998
BUDGET OPTION
SERVICE ORGANIZATION FUNDING
FROM HOPKINS CITY BUDGETS
�un ding has been proposed from the City's General Fund levy.
Mayor- Council Budget
Child's Play Theatre Company $
Westwind Concert Band of Hopkin
H.A.A. Association
Total Mayor- Council $
Health & Welfare Dept:
Sojourner Intervention Project, In$
Replacement of Suburban Allianc
Senior Community Services
West Suburban Mediation Ctr.
Vail Place
Teens Alone, Inc
Family Resource Center
Total Health & Welfare
Total General Fund
Percentage Increase Over
Prior Year
123- servorg
$
Proposed Requested Adopted Actual Actual Actual
1998 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
1,500 $ 3,000* $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500
800 800 800 800 800 800
1,000- 2,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,159
3,300 $ 5,800 3,300 $ 3,300 $ 3T300 $ 3.459
2,100 $
0
10,200
2,750
1 ,500
2, 000
6,300
6,200 12,100 $ 12,100 $ 11,800 $ 11,800
0 0 4,650 4,650 3,650
11,150 10,200 11,150 10,900 10,900
2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750 2,750
1,500 1,250 1,250 1,200 1,200
2,000 2,000 2,000 2000 2,000
7,500 6,300 6,300
34,600 $ 41,100
$ 37,900 $
23.7 % -12.9%
4.6%
5,000 5,000
34,600 $ 40200 $ 38,300 $ 37,300
46,900 37,900 $ 43,500 $ 41 ,600 $ 40,759
2.1% 18.8%