IV.6. Resolution for Approval of West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 1) and Agreement to Continue Participation in the Development and Implementation of the Remain CITY OF HOPKINS
City Council Report 2025-040
To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Mike Mornson, City Manager
From: Eric Klingbeil, City Engineer
Date: March 18, 2025
Subject: Approval of West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan
_____________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDED ACTION
MOTION TO Approve Resolution 2025-017, Resolution for Approval of West Metro
Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan (Part 1) and Agreement to Continue
Participation in the Development and Implementation of the Remainder of the Plan
(Part II) and authorize staff to sign the attached Letter of Support.
OVERVIEW
The state of Minnesota’s Wellhead Protection Program, administered by the Minnesota
Department of Health (MDH), requires all public water suppliers to develop local
wellhead protection programs to protect groundwater sources of drinking water. The city
of Hopkins currently has a Wellhead Protection Plan approved by MDH in place, but
these plans need to be updated at least every 10 years, sometimes sooner with major
changes to the water supply system per the Wellhead Protection Rule (Minnesota
Rules parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590).
The City is currently updating their Wellhead Protection Plan, but this time in
conjunction with seven other communities in the West Metro that utilize the same water
supply aquifer. Participating communities include Hopkins, Bloomington, Chanhassen,
Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka, Richfield, and Saint Louis Park. This is part of a pilot
project with MDH and the Metropolitan Council to evaluate alternative drinking water
planning approaches to the current “city-by-city” approach. The pilot project offers the
opportunity to explore multiple benefits that a multi-community Wellhead Protection
Plan may provide. The West Metro was selected for this pilot project due to the interest
of local public water suppliers and the presence of many overlapping drinking water
supply management areas (DWSMAs) that extend into multiple jurisdictions.
The vision for this pilot project is to develop a coordinated and collaborative approach
to protect and safeguard sub-regional drinking water sources that reduces barriers and
improves local drinking water protection implementation in overlapping DWSMAs or
where DWSMAs extend into a neighboring city.
Part I of the Wellhead Protection Plan includes the delineation of a wellhead protection
area and DWSMA, along with vulnerability assessments for the water supply wells and
Engineering Department
water supply aquifer. This Part I plan has been approved by MDH, as it has been
determined to be in compliance with the Wellhead Protection Rule. The Part I plan was
completed at no cost to the City by Barr Engineering under contract with the
Metropolitan Council, who received a Clean Water Fund appropriation specifically for
this work.
The Wellhead Protection Plan will now continue into Part II of the plan, which includes
determining goals, objectives, and management strategies for potential sources of
contamination with the DWSMA. This Part II plan will also be a multi-community plan
with the same communities that participated in the Part I, with specific management
strategies for the City to complete within their jurisdiction.
The Part II plan will be written by MDH and Minnesota Rural Water Association staff,
with assistance from the Metropolitan Council, so there will be no funding needed from
Hopkins to complete this plan.
Due to the pilot nature of this project, there is not a hard deadline for the Part II to be
completed, but it is estimated to be approved by MDH in Winter-Spring 2026.
In order to ensure all governing bodies are on the same page, MDH is asking each
participating community to approve the Part I plan and agree to continue the Wellhead
Protection Plan process by completing and implementing a multi-community Part II
plan.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Resolution 2025-017
Hopkins Letter of Support
Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Pilot Project Vision Document
West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan Part I Summary
CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2025-017
RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF WEST METRO MULTI-COMMUNITY
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN (PART I) AND AGREEMENT TO CONTINUE
PARTICIPATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
REMAINDER OF THE PLAN (PART II)
WHEREAS,the city of Hopkins recognizes the importance of its groundwater supply as
a natural resource used for drinking water; and
WHEREAS,the city of Hopkins also recognizes the importance of protecting
groundwater and drinking water on a sub-regional scale, especially in areas like the
west Twin Cities metropolitan area where many communities utilize the same water
supply aquifer and have drinking water supply management areas previously approved
by the Minnesota Department of Health that overlap one another; and
WHEREAS,it is within the responsibility of the city of Hopkins as a public water
supplier, to consider the health, safety, and welfare of its customers; and
WHEREAS, the city has been presented the locations of the wellhead protection areas
and drinking water supply management area, as well as the vulnerability assessments
for the city’s wells, neighboring cities’ wells, and the sub-regional water supply aquifer.
This information encompasses Part I of the West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead
Protection Plan,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by City Council of the City of Hopkins
1. The city of Hopkins does hereby agree to take action to protect their wells and
the area within their jurisdiction of the drinking water supply management area
that has been approved by the Minnesota Department of Health.
2. The city of Hopkins does hereby approve the wellhead protection area, drinking
water supply management area, and vulnerability assessments for the city’s
wells and water supply aquifer.
3. The city of Hopkins does hereby agree to continue the wellhead protection
planning process by completing and implementing a multi-community Part II plan
with the other communities that participated in the Part I plan.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 18th day of March, 2025.
By:___________________________
Patrick Hanlon, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Amy Domeier, City Clerk
City of Hopkins
1010 First Street South Hopkins, MN 55343-3435 Phone: 952-548-6331 Fax: 952-935-1834
Web address: www.hopkinsmn.com
Partnering with the Community to Enhance the Quality of Life
Inspire Educate Involve Communicate
March 18, 2025
Ms. Trudi Witkowski
Minnesota Department of Health
Source Water Protection Unit
P.O. Box 64975
St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975
Dear Ms. Witkowski:
Re: Hopkins Approval of West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan, Part I
The city of Hopkins (the City) understands that Barr Engineering has successfully completed the West
Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan, Part I, which includes the:
1) wellhead protection area and drinking water supply management area delineations, and
2) vulnerability assessments of the wells and aquifer within the drinking water supply management
area.
The City also understands that the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has reviewed and
approved this Part I plan, finding that it meets the criteria in the Minnesota Wellhead Protection Rule
(Minnesota Rules parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590) where applicable for the multi-community nature of
the plan.
MDH has asked each participating community to approve the delineated multi-community drinking
water supply management area and Part I plan, as well as agree to continue participation in the
development and implementation of the Part II plan.
On March 18, 2025 the City passed the enclosed resolution that:
1) approves the wellhead protection areas and drinking water supply management area
delineations,
2) approves the vulnerability assessments of the wells and aquifer within the drinking water supply
management area, and
3) agrees to continue participation in the development and implementation of the multi-community
Part II plan.
City of Hopkins
1010 First Street South Hopkins, MN 55343-3435 Phone: 952-548-6331 Fax: 952-935-1834
Web address: www.hopkinsmn.com
Partnering with the Community to Enhance the Quality of Life
Inspire Educate Involve Communicate
The City looks forward to continuing to work on this project to develop a shared wellhead protection
plan with neighboring communities in the west metro.
Sincerely,
Eric Klingbeil, PE
City Engineer
City of Hopkins
Enclosure: Resolution 2025-017
cc: Sean Moilenen, Wellhead Protection Manager, Hopkins
Abby Shea, Planner, Minnesota Department of Health
Robyn Hoerr, Source Water Protection Specialist, Minnesota Rural Water Association
Jen Kader, Senior Planner, Metropolitan Council
1
Safe and reliable drinking water is a public health priority for Minnesota Department of Health
(MDH). Protection of drinking water resources under the State Wellhead Protection (WHP) Program
is implemented on a city-by-city basis. As a result, each city has different implementation actions of
their plan and a focus to protect their own drinking water source. The West Metro has many areas
where one city’s drinking water supply management area (DWSMA) area extends beyond that city’s
border; meaning a city may be dependent on the protection actions taken by their neighbor to
protect their drinking water supply source.
MDH, Metropolitan Council, and Public Water Systems (PWS) are evaluating alternative drinking
water planning approaches to the current “city-by-city” approach with a pilot project. This pilot
project offers the opportunity to explore multiple benefits that a multi-community WHP plan may
provide. MDH will use the approaches and lessons learned from this pilot to evaluate new plan
development and implementation options to consider during WHP Rule revisions.
Vision
Develop a coordinated and collaborative approach to protect and safeguard regional drinking water
sources that reduces barriers and improves local drinking water protection implementation in
overlapping DWSMAs or where DWSMAs extend into a neighboring city.
Stakeholder Benefits for collaborative wellhead protection
Benefits to Communities:
• Collaboration by cities to protect shared, regional aquifers.
• Use of updated regional groundwater model, at no cost to systems.
• Reduced time required for individual city WHP planning and implementation.
• Improved consistency in WHP implementation priorities based on same regional scale
groundwater model, vulnerability assessment, and delineation work.
• Coordinated and prioritized implementation activities on a sub-regional scale yielding more
consistent and protective outcomes.
• Improved local and State coordination and communication in managing drinking water
resources.
MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) PILOT PROJECT
2
• Increased amount of grant dollars available by collaboration on projects.
• Coordinated regional drinking water protection and understanding of how to protect
drinking water across multiple cities.
Benefits to Minnesota Department of Health:
• Reduced time for WHP review and reduced number of plans needing review.
• WHP implementation priorities based on same regional scale groundwater model,
vulnerability assessment, and delineation work.
• Improved local and State coordination and communication in managing drinking water
resources.
Benefits to Metropolitan Council:
• Furthers mission to help improve drinking water resources across the metropolitan area.
• Supports the work direction of the guiding committees, the Metropolitan Area Water
Supply Advisory Committee (MAWSAC) and its Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).
The proposed process will begin as:
1. MDH and Metropolitan Council, with the assistance of a consultant, update the regional
groundwater model using the latest available datasets. Communities are asked to be aware
and engaged during this phase of the project and share information for modeling, upon
request.
2. Updated model and delineations available for communities to use for future WHP planning
and implementation activities. Until regional delineation is completed, group members
implement their individual plans collaboratively.
3. Participating communities use updated model and delineation for WHP planning for their
community.
4. Communities in Pilot Group continue to work together to collaboratively manage WHP
areas and protect source water. During delineation phase, group members explore options
for governing ongoing plan development work and implementation for the regional
DWSMA.
5. MDH and Metropolitan Council agree to provide funds to hire a facilitator to assist
communities.
This approach is likely to occur in some key phases:
Subregional
DWSMA
delineation and
assessment
Pilot Group
Established
Collaborative
Management
Plan
Collaborative
Implementation
MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION (WHP) PILOT PROJECT
3
Funding and technical assistance will be provided by both MDH and Metropolitan
Council to support establishing the Pilot Group including:
• Facilitation of all meetings with external facilitation support.
• Hiring a consultant to work with communities to develop goals, implementation strategies,
and activities to protect drinking water in the DWSMA.
• Technical assistance from MDH and Metropolitan Council hydrologists and planners.
• MDH extensions on existing WHP plan for participating communities.
Participating communities will benefit from shared commitments and are asked to:
• Be committed and stay engaged in the process.
• Encourage community planners, city leaders, and neighbors to participate.
• Explain project to others.
• Attend meetings regularly.
• Share project updates as requested.
• Maintain open communication with MDH and Metropolitan Council.
• Continue to implement existing Wellhead Protection Plan while regional plan is being
developed.
• Commitment to completing a regional WHP plan that can be supported and implemented
by the communities.
• Formulate a form of governing body or operating principles as a group.
• Assist each other with funding/lobbying requests as needed.
• Meet regularly and follow a group-established workplan to push for continuous
improvement and source water protection.
For more information, contact Abby Shea (abby.shea@state.mn.us) or Jen Kader
(jen.kader@metc.state.mn.us).
1
West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan, Part 1
EXE CUTIVE SUMMARY
The communities of Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka,
Richfield, and Saint Louis Park partnered with the Minnesota Department of Health and the
Metropolitan Council to pilot a multi-community approach to wellhead protection planning.
The pilot project analyzed time of travel to 88 existing community supply wells and one planned
supply well (Table 1).
The wellhead protection area (WHPA) represents the area around the wells that contributes
water to the community supply wells within a 10-year time period. The drinking water supply
management area (DWSMA) fully envelops the WHPA and is defined by features on the surface
such as roads, property lines, public land survey system (PLSS) area boundaries, etc.
A new sub-regional groundwater flow model was developed from the existing Metro Model 3
regional groundwater model for the purposes of delineating the WHPA and DWSMA. This new
model incorporated the most up-to-date geology and pumping information and was built using
MODFLOW6, the most recent version of MODFLOW supported by the United States Geological
Survey.
The DWSMA area was determined through a combination of the sub-regional groundwater
model, fracture flow calculations, and overland flow. Then the vulnerability was determined
using a combination of the 40-acre PLSS quarter-quarter sections, water chemistry data, soils
data, and geology. Much of the DWSMA is of low or moderate vulnerability with a few areas of
high vulnerability (Figure 1). DWSMA vulnerability represents the sensitivity of the aquifer to
impacts from land use and water management within the area.
2
Table 1. Municipal Water Supply Well Details
City Unique
Number Local Well Name Use/
Status1
Casing
Depth
(feet)
Well Depth
(feet)
Date
Constructed/
Reconstructed
Well
Vulnerability* Aquifer
St. Louis Park 200542 St. Louis Park #4 A/Primary 410 503 1946 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
St. Louis Park 203678 St. Louis Park #8 A/Primary 314 507 1955 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
St. Louis Park 206442 St. Louis Park #10 A/Primary 316 500 1955 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
St. Louis Park 206439 St. Louis Park #11 A/Primary 880 1093 1960 Not Vulnerable Mt. Simon Sandstone
St. Louis Park 206456 St. Louis Park #12 A/Primary 900 1095 1965 Not Vulnerable Mt. Simon Sandstone
St. Louis Park 206424 St. Louis Park #13 A/Primary 891 1045 1964 Not Vulnerable Mt. Simon Sandstone
St. Louis Park 227965 St. Louis Park #14 A/Primary 389 485 1965 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
St. Louis Park 215447 St. Louis Park #15 A/Primary 402 503 1969 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone – St. Lawerence
St. Louis Park 203187 St. Louis Park #16 A/Primary 425 500 1973 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 204140 Minnetonka #10 A/Primary 305 505 1969 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 150356 Minnetonka #10a A/Primary 302 486 1981 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 208014 Minnetonka #11 A/Primary 282 498 1970 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 439797 Minnetonka #11a A/Primary 291 492 1988 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 203717 Minnetonka #12 A/Primary 332 535 1971 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 191939 Minnetonka #12a A/Primary 340 506 1985 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 205165 Minnetonka #13 A/Primary 292 475 1972 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 132263 Minnetonka #13a A/Primary 274 464 1978 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 204537 Minnetonka #14 A/Primary 367 555 1972 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 160021 Minnetonka #14a A/Primary 395 575 1978 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 208016 Minnetonka #15 A/Primary 235 450 1974 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 150351 Minnetonka #15a A/Primary 238 444 1978 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
WEST METRO MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN PART 1 SUMMARY
3
City Unique
Number Local Well Name Use/
Status1
Casing
Depth
(feet)
Well Depth
(feet)
Date
Constructed/
Reconstructed
Well
Vulnerability* Aquifer
Minnetonka 661401 Minnetonka #16a A/Primary 322 530 2001 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 661402 Minnetonka #16b A/Primary 303 519 2002 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 204470 Minnetonka #3 A/Primary 393 465 1963 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 171021 Minnetonka #3a A/Primary 254 468 1981 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 204054 Minnetonka #6 A/Primary 394 488 1967 Not Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Minnetonka 208012 Minnetonka #6a A/Primary 397 486 1967 Not Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 737048 Chanhassen #10 A/Primary 375 482 2006 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 760936 Chanhassen #12 A/Primary 270 441 2008 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 760937 Chanhassen #13 A/Primary 290 460 2008 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 775541 Chanhassen #14 A/Primary 280 472 2010 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 810696 Chanhassen #15 A/Primary 428 530 2015 Not Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone-
Chanhassen 220976 Chanhassen #2 A/Primary 246 471 1969 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 200195 Chanhassen #3 A/Primary 317 500 1973 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 180913 Chanhassen #4 A/Primary 289 478 1981 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien – Tunnel City Group
Chanhassen 541545 Chanhassen #7 A/Primary 330 490 1996 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 578953 Chanhassen #8 A/Primary 378 489 1999 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Chanhassen 709304 Chanhassen #9 A/Seasonal 373 482 2004 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Bloomington 222910 Bloomington #1 A/Primary 345 440 1973 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Bloomington 222911 Bloomington #2 A/Primary 315 392 1973 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Bloomington 222912 Bloomington #3 A/Primary 450 950 1974 Vulnerable Tunnel City Group - Mt. Simon Sandstone
Bloomington 133389 Bloomington #4 A/Primary 282 376 1978 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Bloomington 603079 Bloomington #5 A/Primary 307 405 2001 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Bloomington 603080 Bloomington #6 A/Primary 298 399 2001 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Richfield 206353 Richfield #1 A/Primary 343 437 1961 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
WEST METRO MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN PART 1 SUMMARY
4
City Unique
Number Local Well Name Use/
Status1
Casing
Depth
(feet)
Well Depth
(feet)
Date
Constructed/
Reconstructed
Well
Vulnerability* Aquifer
Richfield 206354 Richfield #2 A/Primary 343 435 1961 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Richfield 206361 Richfield #3 A/Primary 226 425 1962 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Richfield 206276 Richfield #4 A/Primary 208 405 1962 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Richfield 206280 Richfield #5 A/Primary 226 408 1963 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Richfield 206279 Richfield #6 A/Primary 225 422 1963 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Richfield 133362 Richfield #7 A/Primary 631 1066 1977 Not Vulnerable Wonewoc - Mt. Simon
Edina 208399 Edina #2 A/Primary 266 448 2007 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 240630 Edina #3 A/Seasonal 265 496 1949 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 200561 Edina #4 A/Primary 266 500 1950 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 206377 Edina #5 A/Seasonal 257 443 2002 Not Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 200564 Edina #6 A/Primary 316 503 1954 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 206474 Edina #7 A/Primary 350 547 1955 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 204884 Edina #8 A/Seasonal 232 472 1953 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 206588 Edina #9 A/Seasonal 1010 1130 1957 Not Vulnerable Mt. Simon Sandstone
Edina 206184 Edina #10 A/Primary 881 1001 1963 Not Vulnerable Mt. Simon Sandstone
Edina 206183 Edina #11 A/Primary 321 403 1963 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Edina 203614 Edina #12 A/Primary 955 1080 1964 Vulnerable Mt. Simon Sandstone
Edina 203613 Edina #13 A/Primary 429 495 1964 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Edina 207674 Edina #15 A/Primary 275 475 2002 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 203101 Edina #16 A/Seasonal 265 381 1967 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Edina 200914 Edina #17 A/Seasonal 373 461 1970 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Edina 200918 Edina #18 A/Seasonal 365 446 1973 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Edina 505626 Edina #19 A/Seasonal 440 521 1989 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Edina 686286 Edina #20 A/Seasonal 265 467 2008 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
WEST METRO MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN PART 1 SUMMARY
5
City Unique
Number Local Well Name Use/
Status1
Casing
Depth
(feet)
Well Depth
(feet)
Date
Constructed/
Reconstructed
Well
Vulnerability* Aquifer
Hopkins 204068 Hopkins #4 A/Primary 410 548 1954 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Hopkins 204570 Hopkins #5 A/Primary 382 495 1967 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Hopkins 112228 Hopkins #6 A/Primary 354 545 1977 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 205905 Eden Prairie #2 A/Primary 210 394 1971 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 112242 Eden Prairie #3 A/Primary 207 392 1978 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 147454 Eden Prairie #4 A/Primary 207 381 1982 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 147453 Eden Prairie #5 A/Primary 219 393 1981 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 147452 Eden Prairie #6 A/Primary 230 388 1981 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 424924 Eden Prairie #7 A/Primary 306 383 1987 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 424925 Eden Prairie #8 A/Primary 316 391 1987 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 424926 Eden Prairie #9 A/Primary 319 405 1987 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 424927 Eden Prairie #10 A/Primary 308 401 1987 Vulnerable Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 541542 Eden Prairie #11 A/Primary 232 408 1994 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 541541 Eden Prairie #12 A/Primary 215 385 1994 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 622703 Eden Prairie #13 A/Primary 210 410 1998 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 603068 Eden Prairie #14 A/Primary 241 418 2000 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 686256 Eden Prairie #15 A/Primary 243 420 2005 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
Eden Prairie 763769 Eden Prairie #16 A/Primary 278 405 2008 Vulnerable Prairie du Chien - Jordan Sandstone
*Well vulnerability was assessed based on a combination of 1) well construction details, especially conformance with standards required by the state well code, 2) the geologic
sensitivity of the aquifers, and 3) past monitoring results.
WEST METRO MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN PART 1 SUMMARY
6
Figure 1. West Metro Multi-Community Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA)
WEST METRO MULTI-COMMUNITY WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN PART 1 SUMMARY
7
Figure 2. West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA)