VII.1. Review of Concept Plan for Footprint Development
P&Z Report 2025-03
To: Planning and Zoning Commission Members
From: Ryan Krzos, City Planner
Date: March 25, 2025
Subject: Review of Concept Plan for Footprint Development
_____________________________________________________________________
REQUEST
Footprint Development requests Concept Plan review for a proposed two-phased
development along Mainstreet. The concept proposes an initial phase consisting of a
38-unit three-story multi-household apartment building at 501 Mainstreet with a surface
parking facility at 15 - 6th Avenue North. The second phase of the concept development
is a 33-unit three-story multi-household apartment building at 525 Mainstreet.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to review and provide initial comments
and feedback on the concept plans prior to a formal land use application. The
Commission is asked to specifically comment on the potential Planned Unit
Development form of approval. Recommendations and opinions expressed by the
Commission as part of a concept plan review are for guidance only and are not to be
considered binding.
ANALYSIS
Concept Overview
Address: 501 Mainstreet, 525 Mainstreet, and 15 - 6th Avenue N
Applicant/Owner: Footprint Development, Applicant / Hopkins HRA, Property Owner
BASE ZONE: RX-D EXISTING USE:
Undeveloped (former
fuel/service station, auto sales
lot, and residence)
BUILDING TYPES
ALLOWED:
General Building,
Row Building PROPOSED USE:
Household Living, 5+ units
(38 proposed units in phase 1
and 33 units in phase 2)
Standalone Surface Parking
will need to be authorized in a
PUD
BUILDING TYPE
SELECTED: General Building PERMITTED/CONDITIONAL: Permitted/PUD
SITE AREA 0.91 ac (39,405 sf) DENSITY: 78 units/ac
BUILDING SIZE: Three Stories COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION:
Downtown Center (20-100
units/ac)
Planning & Development
Background Timeline
Oct 2024 Request for Proposals (RFP) Issued
• For development sites:
o 501 Mainstreet, 525 Mainstreet and 15 - 6th Avenue North
o 102 - 10th Avenue North (Lot 800)
• Based on developer interest and a desire to put HRA-owned land into
productive use
Dec 2024 Proposals were accepted through December 20, 2024.
• One proposal was received from Footprint Development for the
Mainstreet and 15 - 6th Avenue North properties.
Jan 2025
Feb 2025
Reviewed by the City Council
• Closed-door meeting on January 14.
• Based on City feedback, the developer adjusted the site plan to add
additional parking,
• Again discussed at a February 4 closed-door City Council meeting.
The City Council elected to continue discussions and take next steps with the
developer through a Preliminary Development Agreement
Mar 2025 Preliminary Development Agreement Approved by City Council on March 4,
The developer hosted a neighborhood meeting on March 12, 2025, at Hopkins
City Hall.
• A copy of the meeting notes is included as an attachment.
Planning & Zoning Commission Concept Plan Review
Apr 2025 City Council will review Concept Plan
The project proforma will be reviewed by the City’s financial advisor and
environmental site assessments will be updated
Jun 2025 Staff and the City Attorney will negotiate the terms of a Purchase and
Development Agreement which will be brought to the HRA and City Council for
approval.
Later in
2025
Anticipated Development Plan submittal
The procedure includes a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning &
Zoning Commission for the rezoning and approval of Site Development Plans.
City Council makes final decision on the application
2026 If approved, construction would start
Development Policy Consistency
Development Code (Zoning)
A summary of applicable zoning requirements and a cursory evaluation against
determinable elements of the proposal is included here. The developer should
note the identified requirements and seek to address any deficiencies where
feasible.
Any remaining zoning code discrepancies may be addressed through the
Planned Unit Development process. In the Planned Unit Development process
the City expects to receive public benefits that meet or exceed flexibility granted
from the typical standards. A few of the zoning requirements, identified below,
are expected to be among deviations in the Planned Unit Development request.
Off-Street Parking
Off-Site Parking
Setbacks and
Impervious Cover
The concept as whole would not meet the underlying
vehicle parking requirements. The developer has
stated that the units would be generally marketed
toward prospects that are more inclined to a car-less
lifestyle. Additionally, the site is in an environment with
access to transit and other forms of transportation and
within proximity to amenities meeting daily needs. The
developer also proposed offering a car share amenity.
The first phase would be developed with a parking
ratio closer to the minimum requirements (27 stalls for
38 units proposed; 45 stalls is the required minimum).
The developer has indicated that the design of the
second phase may vary based on the performance of
the first.
The Development Code allows for credits and
reductions for provision of bike-share, car-share, and
for affordable units. Additionally, the amount of
required stalls may be reduce through alternative
compliance measures involving the preparation of a
travel demand management plan.
However, to meet the practical needs of residents and
guests the City may look to explore parking permits
within a nearby City facility and/or expanding on-street
parking where practical.
Residential parking is required to be on the site of the
building it serves. The City Council and staff
encouraged the developer to maximize the amount of
parking available to residents. As such, the 6th Avenue
N lot is proposed as surface parking. While this would
serve the immediate need, it also represents a “land
banking” opportunity. Should car ownership and
transportation characteristics change in the future,
redevelopment of the parking area could occur.
In general, the building is located close to the sidewalk
/street with the intention to create an edge for the
pedestrian realm and for a more urban presence. The
proposed building locations would conflict with street-
side setback requirements. The lessened setback also
allows for a maximization of the size of individual units
and the resulting walk-up style.
Additionally, the concept for 501 Mainstreet and
potentially the surface parking lot on 6th Avenue
exceed the allowable impervious coverage. It appears
the sites may cumulatively meet the 70% requirement,
which staff finds to be a reasonable approach.
Additionally, the developer explore semi-pervious
surfaces, such as porous pavers/pavement.
The developer is expected to detail how the flexibility offered by the Planned Unit
Development is offset with a higher quality design and/or meeting other City
goals. Items typically consider when evaluating the use of a Planned Unit
Development could include, but is not limited to:
• Public Art
• Natural resource protection and storm water management
• Pedestrian and bicycle facilities
• Enhanced sustainability or livability elements
• Energy conservation and renewable energy
• Enhanced Streetscape elements
• Enhanced transit facilities
• Enhanced landscaping and buffering
• Native and/or Salt-tolerant plantings
• Other suggestions from Planning & Zoning Commissioners
A significant aspect of the development expected to be offered by the developer
as an offset is certification through the Passive House Institute. Passive House
Certification sets rigorous energy efficiency standards and tied to specific
performance criteria. The developer is expected to provide greater detail related
to the sustainability considerations during the presentation.
Comprehensive Plan
A detailed list of the applicable goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
addressed by the concept is available here. In general, the concept is responsive
to the goals and policies related to compact urban development in downtown
Hopkins; encouragement of transit, biking and walking; building sustainability and
energy efficiency; and affordability and options in housing.
Inclusionary Housing Policy
The City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy would apply to the project. The policy
units to be constructed and offered at an affordable rent as moderate-income
units at levels based on one of two options. Either 10% of the units at 60% of the
Area Median Income; or 5% of units at 50% AMI. The development is expected
to comply with this requirement by providing units affordable at 60% of Area
Median Income.
Sustainable Building Policy
The City’s Sustainable Building Policy may be in place by the time formal land
use applications are submitted. Staff expects that the Passive House certification
likely would significantly satisfy much of the policy. However, the developer may
also have to address specific aspects of the universal provisions that may not
already be covered by the Passive House certification. Staff believes exceeding
the policies requirements may be viewed as an offset in the Planned Unit
Development.
Staff Comments
Staff distributed the concept plans for review and comment to other City departments,
including Engineering, Building Inspections, Fire, and Police. Below is a list of
comments the developer should consider in moving forward with developing plans for
the formal land use approval process.
• Prepare travel demand management plan as part of a request for relief from off-
street parking standards.
• Ensure that a 10-foot separation from existing buildings is provided for
emergency access, and light and air.
• Consider the use of semi-pervious surfaces.
• Re-evaluate the use of metal panels on street facades as minor cladding
element. Composite or Fiber Cement would be acceptable alternative.
• Proposed balconies conflict with design requirements.
• Utility equipment is expected to be located inside, unless if doing so conflicts with
the equipment’s function.
• A survey of existing trees on the site is required, which is to include identification
of significant and contributing trees.
• Explore ways to enhance landscaping around perimeter of surface parking areas.
• Develop plan for servicing of refuse and recycling containers.
• Consult with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for stormwater treatment
requirements and permitting.
• Consult with Hopkins Public Safety staff to explore ways to promote and support
resident safety.
• Work with City Staff and Metro Transit for possible enhancements to bus stops
adjacent to the site.
NEXT STEPS
The City Council will review the Concept Plan at the April 8, 2025, meeting.
6 STALLS
21 STALLS
Ma
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
501 Mainstreet Minutes
# of attendees: 14 + 3 staff
Questions
• Are they putting up more apartments here?
• Do you own those lots?
• Do you develop other properties?
• What company are you with?
*presentation at 5pm*
Questions
- How many charging stations?
- Are there buildings being torn down? There’s a building in between there.
- Is there a reason for the step-down garden units?
- How come your left building is crooked?
- Any elevators or handicap accessible units?
- Maybe you’ll share the slides with us?
- Do you have any pictures of what the property looks like now?
- Without elevators, with people furnishing units, concerns over moving in – will there
be furnished units?
- What other multifamily or other properties has footprint developed?
- In the buildings that you have, how many cars do people actually have? If you have
40 units, is that 40 cars?
- So once you’ve met the # of parking spaces, do you have means of limiting tenants
who don’t have vehicles?
o The City does have requirements for MF tenants parking?
- So, if your calculation is right, 50% have cars, you’ll be 14 cars short. Those cars are
going to cluster up 6th Ave.
- What would be the impact of the second building on sunlight and views to existing
building in between them?
- Have you done any parking or traffic impact studies or plans to do that?
- Are your buildings pet friendly?
- So you have a dog run, if you have dogs there, where are they going to toilet if you
don’t have any grass available?
- Do you have an estimate on rent?
- During construction itself, I live next door, do you have an idea on where to
accommodate construction and delivery vehicles?
- How’s leasing going at solstice?
- What is your renewal rate?
- What are the buildings that are housing this project? You’re surrounded by
apartments?
- What is your square footage on your units?
- What’s the foundation size?
- What is the heat and air conditioning? But only down to a certain temperature?
- To clarify, you’re talking just over 70 units between both phases of development?
- Three story, maybe four story, what would influence your decision?
- Are any of those lots public? Guests couldn’t park there overnight?
- So your first phase is mainstreet and 5th ave corner?
- Do you have an onsite manager and office in the building?
- In order to foster the eco-conscious goal of your property, are there any creative
solutions to encourage reduction in cars – work with metrotransit for passes?
- If you find that there a lot of vehicles in the first phase, so you’ll restudy for the
second phase, what would be the plan then?
- Do you anticipate housing demand continuing to grow? There’s been two really big
projects in the area.
- Is it a big draw, the air quality?
- What’s your background, what were you doing 5 years ago before you started a
development company?
- I’m just curious, with the corners you have going on there, you;ll have buildings on
two of your four corners, limiting view of 2 sides of your renters – will those units be
cheaper?
- Do you have controlled access?
- I missed the first part, is this all electric?
- So laundry?
- Sewer line has been updated – studies on where sewer is going in for the load?
- Got a name for the building?
- How many cards did you send out?