CR 98-123 Liquor Compliance Checks - PenaltiesJuly 17, 1998
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that Council consider penalty options for second -time offenders
of the liquor compliance checks conducted under the "Minnesota Join Together
Coalition" grant project.
Overview
Council Report 98 -123
LIQUOR COMPLIANCE CHECKS - PENALTIES
The Hopkins Police Department, with the help of the Hopkins Chemical Health
Commission, has implemented a program to perform liquor compliance checks at all
licensed Liquor establishments in the city of Hopkins. This project was funded by
the Minnesota Join Together Coalition Mini -Grant Program.
The focus of the project is to "determine the present level of liquor establishment
compliance in checking identification as required by law. By identifying locations
that are not in compliance, we will be able to assist establishments in correcting
the problem by providing them with information on proper identification procedures,
and if necessary take administrative or legal action if repeat violations occur."'
The program called for compliance checks to be conducted. All establishments
were pre - notified by an informational letter. 9 out of 24 establishments failed the
first compliance check, and sold alcohol to minors.
No criminal or administrative action resulted from these first -round violations.
Statistical information gathered during this part of the project was given to the
Hopkins City Council, the Hopkins School District and local news media.
Each establishment received a letter showing the results of the checks. Those who
committed violations received information and educational material to assist them
in avoiding future violations, and a copy of MSS 340A.503 covering the sale of
alcohol to minors and the associated criminal penalties. Establishments with no
violations received a congratulatory letter, supporting information and educational
material.
' HPD grant application
Council Report
1
Overview, cont'd
During a council worksession prior to the acceptance of the grant, penalty options
for violations committed during the grant compliance checks were discussed and
left open for future consideration.
At the July 7 meeting the Hopkins Chemical Health Commission passed a motion
to encourage the city to assess penalties for repeat violations made during the last
round of grant compliance checks.
Staff recommends the Council provide direction from the following alternatives:
ALTERNATIVES TO CONSIDER
Alternative #1: Adopt the recommendation of the Chemical Health Commission
to assess penalties for second -time violators during the final round of grant
compliance checks. This would involve pressing criminal charges and
administrative penalties outlined in Hopkins Administrative Policy 4 -B, Liquor Law
Violations,
Alternative #2: Use the results of the final round of grant compliance checks for
statistical purposes only, then in a joint meeting of the Council and Chemical
Health Commission, discuss administrative actions to be taken in the future for
liquor law violations,
Alternative #3: Use the results of the final round of grant compliance checks for
statistical purposes only, setting forth administrative provisions for future
compliance checks which would impose criminal and administrative sanctions.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:
• MINNESOTA JOIN - TOGETHER COALITION - MINI -GRANT APPLICATION 1997
• ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 4 -B, LIQUOR LAW VIOLATIONS
• LETTER BY CHIEF OF POLICE TO ALL LIQUOR LICENSEES ANNOUNCING COMPLIANCE CHECKS
• CONGRATULATORY LETTER TO NON - VIOLATORS
• NOTIFICATION LETTER TO VIOLATORS
• MEMO TO STEVE MIELKE AND HOPKINS CITY COUNCIL, LIQUOR COMPLIANCE CHECK RESULTS
• MEMO TO STEVE MIELKE AND HOPKINS CITY COUNCIL, LIQUOR COMPLIANCE CHECK GRANT
Heather M. Al x, • • ministrative Services Manager
Council Report
2
Policy 4-B
Liquor Law Violations
1. PURPOSE
1.01 It is the intent of this policy to inform the public and business community in the City of
Hopkins that henceforth all criminal violations of liquor laws and ordinances will result in
automatic administrative action. Nothing in this policy concerning the administrative
procedures that will be followed in the event of criminal violations of liquor laws and
ordinances shall detract from the Council's authority to impose sanctions for violations of
other criminal laws occurring on the premises of licensees or for complaints of
non - criminal conduct.
2. PROCEDURE
2.01 In the event of any reports by the Hopkins Police Department of violations of the laws of
the State of Minnesota or the ordinances of the City of Hopkins relating to alcoholic
beverages, the administration is directed to take the following action:
1. Notify the Council of the report.
2. Monitor the Criminal case resulting from the report.
3. If the criminal case is dismissed or results in an acquittal or if the administration
otherwise finds the evidence of the violation unreliable, the Council shall be so
informed. The Council, at that time, shall decide whether to dismiss the matter or
proceed.
4. If the criminal case results in a conviction or payment of the court cost or if the
administration otherwise finds the evidence reliable, the City Manager shall meet with
the licensee and invite the licensee to sign a conditional admission and waiver of
hearing that includes a proposed sanction.
5. If the conditional admission is signed, it shall be presented to the Council for approval
or other action.
6. If the conditional admission is not signed, the licensee shall be provided notice of a
suspension/revocation hearing and the matter shall be set down on the Council agenda
for hearing.
7. The hearing will be in accord with the Administrative Procedure Act. Minn. Stat.
14.57 to 14.70. The hearing shall be recorded, the City Manager shall present the
evidence establishing the violation, and the licensee shall have the right to
cross- examine witnesses, present evidence, and make a statement to the Council. The
council will issue written findings on whether a violation occurred.
Legislative Policy Manual -- Chapter 4-B Page 1
1) Commission of a
felony related to the
licensed activity.
10 - 25 consecutive
days of suspension
Revocation
N/A
2) Sale of alcoholic
beverages while
license is under
suspension.
10 - 25 consecutive
days of suspension
Revocation
N/A
3 ) Sale of alcoholic
beverages to under age
person.
0 - 5 consecutive
days of suspension.
6 - 15 consecutive
days of suspension.
Revocation
4) Sale of alcoholic
beverage to
intoxicated person
0 - 5 consecutive
days of suspension..
6 -15 consecutive
days of suspension.
16 consecutive days
of suspension to
Revocation.
5) Sale of alcoholic
beverages after hours,
0 - 2 consecutive
days of suspensiop.
3 - 9 consecutive
days of suspension.
10 consecrative days
of suspension to
Revocation.
6) Illegal gambling on
premises.
0 - 3 consecutive
days of suspension.
4 - 9 consecutive
days of suspension.
10 consecutive days
of suspension to
Revocation.
7) Permit person to leave
premises with
alcoholic beverage.
0 - 2 consecutive
days of suspension..
3 - 5 consecutive
days of suspension.
6 -10 consecutive
days of suspension to
Revocation.
) Violations of City
Ordinances pertaining
to fire or building or
health codes.
0 - 5 consecutive
days of suspension.
6 - 15 consecutive
days of suspension.
16 consecutive days
of suspension to
}}Revocation.
1
3. PRESUMPTIVE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION'S
3.01 The following list of presumptive penalties be assessed as deemed necessary:
e o f Violation 1st Violation 2nd Violatit n 3rd Violation
102 Computation of time. For the purpose of determining the number of occurrences of
violations, the council shall consider a violation as a second occurrence if it occurred
within 18 calendar months of the first violation; and shall: consider a violation as a third
occurrence if it occurred within 30 calendar months of the second violation.
3.03 Other penalties. Nothing in this section shall restrict or limit the authority of the council
to suspend up to 60 days, revoke the license, assess a civil fine not to exceed $2,000, to
impose conditions or take any adverse action in accordance with law, provided that the
license holder has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing.
Established: 515187
Revised: 2/7/89
Minnesota Join Together Coalition - Mini Grant Application 1997
Applicant/Organization Name: Hopkins Police Department
Contact Person:
Connie Kurtz
Address: 1010 1s Street South
City: Hopkins State: MN Zip: 55343
Daytime Phone: (612) 939 -1385 Evening Phone: (612) 931 -9777
Amount Requested: $1580.00
What geographic area will your project impact? Area to be affected by the project will be the city of
Hopkins, which is 4 square miles, population 16, 532 and the Hopkins School District, which serves four
communities and has a student enrollment of 8,038 students.
1. Describe your project in detail:
The Hopkins Police Department, with the help of the Hopkins Chemical Health Commission will develop
and implement a program designed to perform liquor checks at all licensed liquor establishments in the
city of Hopkins (On -sale — 17; Off -sale — 10). Components of the program will include: the develppment of
a step -by -step procedure for performing the liquor compliance check, recruitment of reliable community
youth participants who will be used to perform the compliance check, and responsible adults who will
assist the police department in administering the compliance checks and the project. Results of the
compliance checks will be forwarded to the Hopkins City Council, the Hopkins School District and Hopkins
Business and Civic Association. Statistical results of the compliance checks will be made public via the
official city newspaper. In addition, locations that have failed the compliance check will be furnished with
information to correct the problem, prior to a follow-up compliance check.
2. How does your project support MJT's policy priorities?
The city of Hopkins formed the Chemical Health Commission in 1988 in response to community concern
regarding youth access and use of alcohol, tobacco and drugs. The Chemical Health Commission is
comprised of concerned parents, students, business owners, residents, school and city officials who are
dedicated . to promoting a safe and healthy community.
The Hopkins Police Department and Chemical Health Commission are committed to reducing youth
access to alcohol. The Chemical Health Commission is in support of currently proposed legislation to
reduce underage use of alcohol (SF316/HF761).
3. How will your project reduce youth access to alcohol in your community?
The focus of the project will be to determine the present level of liquor establishment compliance in
checking identification as required by law. By identifying locations that are not in compliance, we will be
able to assist these liquor establishments in corr 'ng the problem by providing them with information on
proper identification procedures, and if necessary aKe administrative or legal action if repeat violations
OCCUr.
Liquor establishments who consistently comply with checking identification of all potential underage
purchasers will reduce youth access to alcohol.
In addition, media coverage will help reinforce the message that Hopkins will not tolerat underage
drinking.
4. What oth r organizations, agencies, and individuals will participate in your proj ct?
Susan Hilal — Hopkins Police Reserve Officer
See attached list.
5. If your project includes youth, how will they be involved in your project?
Youth will participate in performing the liquor compliance checks. Also, the youth representative from the
Chemical Health Commission will participate in the administration of the project.
The Chemical Health Commission and the Hopkins School District, with assistance from Hennepin County
Community Health, are exploring the possibility of conducting a focus group discussion with school district
students regarding youth access to alcohol and alcohol use. Results of the focus group can help support
the findings of the compliance checks.
6. Describe your plan to use the media to promote your project or results?
Prior to the start of the compliance checks an informational article regarding compliance with state liquor
laws, current trend of youth access to a cohol and abuse would be published in th official city newspaper.
, sc� Chs a ee . _,..4._ ,
Upon completion of the project, results will be forwarded to the Hopkins City Coun , Hopkins School
District and Hopkins Business and Civic Association. A follow-up article reporting the statistical results of
the compliance check project including interviews/statements from the above mentioned groups would be •
published in the official city newspaper. .-i a v
7. What other projects have your grouplorganization carried out in the last three years that
indicate we can expect you to be successful with this one?
1995 Hopkins Police worked with the Hopkins Jaycees to improve their liquor sales procedures to
reduce youth access to alcohol during the annual Raspberry Festival. Since procedures were
instituted, there has been a noticeable decrease in alcohol related problems during this vent.
1996 Hopkins Police Department conducted one -time liquor compliance checks in response to
complaints of underage youth purchases.
1996 Hopkins Police Department participated in a Minnesota Department of Health tobacco compliance
project. Participation in this project resulted in the development and passage of a city ordinance
regulating the sale of tobacco in October 1997 (Ordinance # 97 -805.)
1997 Chemical Health Commission sponsored a community -wide program "Walking the Talk ", a program
for parents about alcohol, tobacco and other drug use and nonuse.
1997 A Town Meeting was held in June 1997 regarding youth access to alcohol and tobacco.
8. Provid a tim lin f r y ur project, listing the major step you will take to compl to it, who
re ponsible for carrying it out, and wh n.
Step Person /Group Responsible for Date /Completion
1. Develop Compliance Check & Training Procedures /Connie Kurtz February 1998
2. Recruit & train youth & adult participants /C. Kurtz & Chem Hlth Comm March 1998
April 1998
April -May 1998
3. Media Coverage - article(s) in newspaper /C. Kurtz & Chem Hlth Comm
4. Conduct Compliance Checks/C. Kurtz & Hopkins Police
Compliance checks to coincide with School District Spring Break,
Prom and end of school year
Compile & report results to City Council, School District, HBCA & media June -July 1998
Item
Follow -up compliance checks if necessary April -June 1998
9. Provide a budget for your project. Be specific about how you will spend the money you are
requ sting. Do not list "miscellaneous" or "supplies" or other general categories as it ms.
Budg t for liquor purchases
Staff time for training youth
Staff time for performing compliance checks & follow -up checks
Postage, envelopes, paper/brochure for mailings, gasoline, and
refreshments after compliance checks
Total $1580.00
10. Is additional funding required to complete your project? NO
Key collaborators will be contributing their time as needed for the project In addition, Connie Kurtz of the
Hopkins Police Department will be providing in -kind support in the amount of $1200.
11. How will you follow up your project? What do you anticipate will occur after your project is
complete?
Project follow -up will consist of conducting a seminar for all liquor license holders designed to educate
owners and managers regarding their responsibilities as far as the liquor laws are concerned, changes to
liquor laws or city ordinance, in addition to making sure proper identification procedures are understood
and followed.
Also, work toward developing city policy mandating annual corn fiance checks a d administrative
penalties for non - compliance. - PsOn1N POLICY
Conduct a focus study with community youth regarding their views on underage drinking, youth access to
alcohol and possibl solutions to this problem. ,4 Gk.-P .1tt 1
4 - bo-t- , --f-- , --A- O - ape 4 4,4 .
Cost
$ 300.00
330.00
750.00
200.00
12. In what ways can you/your organization participate in the Minnesota Join Togeth r Coalition?
The Chemical Health Commission will continue to support Minnesota Join Together Coalition's efforts in
reducing youth access to alcohol. Th _ Commission is currently a member of the Star of the North
Coalition and Community Prevention Coalition. The Commission is in support of proposed legislation to
reduce underage use of alcohol. As mentioned above the Commission will seek to encourage th city to
adopt a policy mandating annual compliance checks and administrative penalties. The Commission was
successful in developing an ordinance regulating tobacco sales which was passed in October 1997.
13. By submitting this application, the organizations and individuals involved in this project agree
to comply with all reporting requirements as requested by MJT, to provide documentation of
project activities, data on any compliance checks conducted, and copies of any media
cov rage.
Agreed ��4_ Date: I --i'J /� /9q/7
(Signed by co per;
Dear Liquor Licenseholder /owner:
The Hopkins Police Department and the Hopkins Chemical Health Commission are working together to reduce
youth access to alcohol. Underage drinking is on the rise. Access to alcohol comes from a variety of sources:
a parent, other adults, friends and commercial sources bars, liquor and convenience stores, and home
delivery. Everyone has a responsibility to Make sure that no one under the legal drinking age of 21 obtains
alcohol illegally.
It is difficult to control social providers of alcohol to those under the legal age. However, in light of recent
tragedies, lawmakers in Minnesota and across the country are working to improve legislation to make social
providers of alcohol accountable for their actions.
In the following months, the Hopkins Police Department will be conducting liquor compliance checks at all on
and off sale establishments in town in an effort to reduce if not eliminate illegal sale of alcohol.
As a commercial supplier of alcohol, you too have a responsibility to reduce youth access to alcohol. State
S aws already in place governing sale of alcohol must be obeyed every time you make a sale. It only takes a
few seconds to ask the buyer for identification. In Minnesota, the only forms of identification acceptable to
purchase or consume alcohol are
Minnesota State Statute 340k503 subd. 6...
"a valid driver's license or identification card issued by Minnesota,
another state, or a province of Canada, and including a photograph and
date of birth of the licensed person;
a valid military identification card issued by the United States Department
of Defense; or
in th case of a foreign national, from a nation other than Canada, by a
valid passport"
It takes a whole community to tackle this problem. We are asking for your cooperation in reducing youth
access to alcohol. Please take the time to ask for proper identification as listed above. If you are not sure if
the identification is legal, calf the Hopkins Police Department and an officer will check it out for you
Don't take a chance -- when in doubt, refuse the sale. You might be saving a life and your business.
Sincpgely,
...a. 4. 04444"-)
Earl L. Johnson
Chief of Police
May 26, 1 998
Dear Liquor Licenseholder:
CONGRATULATIONS! The Hopkins Police Department recently conducted
liquor compliance checks on all liquor establishments in the city of Hopkins. 1 am
pleased to inform you that your business passed.
It is important to remember that as a commercial supplier of alcohol, you have a
responsibility to do your part in reducing underage access to alcohol. Remind
your employees to be sure to always ask for proper identification before a sale is
made. If they are unsure of the person's age ask for identification. If unsure any
identification is legal, call the Hopkins Police immediately. An officer will be
dispatched to check it out for you. Don't take a chance - when in doubt, refuse
the sale.
If you have any questions or need information about liquor laws and
responsibilities, please contact Connie Kurtz at 939 -1385.
Keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
a.02 cst,
Earl L. Johnson
Chief of Police
May 26, 1998
Dear Liquor Licenseholder:
The Hopkins Police Department recently conducted liquor compliance checks on all
liquor establishments in Hopkins. Unfortunately, your establishment did not pass the
compliance check.
I would like to take this opportunity to remind you that as a commercial supplier of
alcohol, you have a responsibility to do your part in reducing underage access to
alcohol. It is important for all employees to be properly informed of the legal
responsibilities involved in the sale of alcohol. The Hopkins Police Department makes
the following recommendations:
Management should issue a clear directive to all employees that
your business will not sell alcoholic beverages to anyone under 21.
Consider a policy that requires your employees to request proper
picture identification of anyone purchasing alcoholic beverages
who appears to be age 30 or younger.
Make sure your employees understand that failure to obey liquor
laws and city ordinances regarding liquor sales could result in criminal
penalties, not only to the employee but the business owner as well
• Go over acceptable forms of identification with all employees. Be sure cover
this information with all new employees and periodically have a
refresher session with existing employees.
Enclosed is information on Minnesota alcoholic beverage laws you should know and
obey, as well as information on acceptable forms of identification.
If you have any questions or if, the Hopkins Police Department can be of any assistance,
please call.
.11 rely,
odi-wrov,)
Earl L Johnson
Chief of Police
Minnesota's New Driver's Licenses and Identification Cards
(Information for law enforcement and reteillers)
i 3- 456 -789
123- 4:5
�. DRI
Over 21 Standard Driver's License
TA OTORIZED BICYCLE
R. OR'S PERMIT
4-01-43
M `
23-466-7 8 090
456-7 t0
IIHIESOTA DR;1V
I 23 : :�:NA I STREET
Y 1 . O W < unaacacrsti
Over 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit
Over 21 Identification Card
-4 6-789-000
23. 456 - 789 -000
NNESOTA DR V R
'!!I TEST
Instruction Permit
Under 21 Standard Driver's License
Legal age in lower left corner
MINN SOT A !MOTORIZED BICYCLE
OPERATOR'S R'S ERMIT
UNDER 21
MA
1 11.111 TT
Y !TOWN
l ar APR-09-
Under 21 Motorized Bicycle Permit
Legal age in lower left corner
'NEATA IDENTIFICATION,CARD
NOT A DRIVER'S OcENS ..,<
JR5 2:
Under 21 Identification Card (Black B Card)
Legal age in lower left corner
Card
Color matches license or identificat
on card, except
Over 21 Standard Driver's License
Under 21 Standard Driver's License
• Back of Standard Driver's License
O A digital image of the cardholder is fused with heat into
the card's plastic.
O A colored border around the digital image prevents
replacement and reveals tampering attempts.
Q Each card has the size, shape, and flexibility of a
standard credit card.
O The driver's license number appears five times and the
date of birth four times on the license. All must match
for validation.
A bar code and a magnetically encoded stripe contain
identification data.
O Coded information, including restrictions and
endorsements, is now specific to each cardholder.
__.. Holographic ov rlay
• Type of Iic nse
• Red masthead &
image border
Digital ima a on right
M
1 - 4 789 OO
1;2 3. 456- g
S R T ,
SECURITY FEATURES
13
13
here,
when appropriate
Printed license number
Embossed license number
& information
Holographic overlay
Black masthead &
image border
Digital image on left
�.. ._.....- Magnetically encoded stripe
(contains full name, date of birth &
license number)
Printed license number, nam
birth date
Cardholder specific information
Bar code
(contains license number)
❑ A holographic overlay on the front of the card includes
the word "Minnesota" and a picture of a loon. This
prevents photocopying and fraudulent reproduction.
O "Under 21" versions feature the digital image of the
cardholder on the left front and the cardholder's 21st
birth date in the lo wer left. "Over 21" versions feature
the digital image on the right.
Senior Citizen Public Transit Reduced Fare
= Limited Mobility = Medical Alert
= Requires B Gard
Minnesota Statutes 1997., Table of Chapters
Table of contents for Chapter 340A
340A.503 Persons under 21; illegal acts.
Subdivision 1. Consumption. (a) It is unlawful for
any:
(1) retail intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor
licensee, municipal liquor store, or bottle club permit holder
under section 340A.414, to permit any person under the age of 21
years to drink alcoholic beverages on the licensed premises or
within the municipal liquor store; or
(2) person under the age of 21 years to consume any
alcoholic beverages. If proven by a preponderance of the
evidence, it is an affirmative defense to a violation of this
clause that the defendant consumed the alcoholic beverage in the
household of the defendant's parent or guardian and with the
consent of the parent or guardian.
(b) An offense under paragraph (a), clause (2), may be
prosecuted either in the jurisdiction where consumption occurs
or the jurisdiction where evidence of consumption is observed.
(c) As used in this subdivision, "consume" includes the
ingestion of an alcoholic beverage and the physical condition of
having ingested an alcoholic beverage.
Subd. 2. Purchasing. It is unlawful for any person:
(1) to sell, barter, furnish, or give alcoholic beverages r' S5 m l'
to a person under 21 years of age; `l
(2) under the age of 21 years to purchase or attempt to
purchase any alcoholic beverage unless under the supervision of
a responsible person over the age of 21 for training, education,
or research purposes. Prior notification of the licensing
authority is required unless the supervised alcohol purchase
attempt is for professional research conducted by post - secondary
educational institutions or state, county, or local health
departments; or
(3) to induce a person under the age of 21 years to
purchase or procure any alcoholic beverage, or to lend or
knowingly permit the use of the person's driver's license,
permit, Minnesota identification card, or other form of
identification by a person under the age of 21 years for the
purpose of purchasing or attempting to purchase an alcoholic
beverage.
If proven by a preponderance of the evidence, it shall be
an affirmative defense to a violation of clause (1) that the
defendant is the parent or guardian of the person under 21 years
of age and that the defendant gave or furnished the alcoholic
beverage to that person solely for consumption in the
defendant's household.
Subd. 3. Possession. It is unlawful for a person
under the age of 21 years to possess any alcoholic beverage with
the intent to consume it at a place other than the household of
the person's parent or guardian. Possession at a place other
than the household of the parent or guardian creates a
rebuttable presumption of intent to consume it at a place other
than the household of the parent or guardian. This presumption
may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence.
Subd. 4. Entering licensed premises. (a) It is
unlawful for a person under the age of 21 years to enter an
establishment licensed for the sale of alcoholic beverages or
any municipal liquor store for the purpose of purchasing or
having served or delivered any alcoholic beverage.
(b) Notwithstanding section 340A.509, no ordinance enacted
by a statutory or home rule charter city may prohibit a person
18, 19, or 20 years old from entering an establishment licensed
under this chapter to:
(1) perform work for the establishment, including the
serving of alcoholic beverages, unless otherwise prohibited by
section 340A.412, subdivision 10;
(2) consume meals; and
(3) attend social functions that are held in a portion of
the establishment where liquor is not sold.
Subd. 5. Misrepresentation of age. It is unlawful
for a person under the age of 21 years to claim to be 21 years
.old or older for the purpose of purchasing alcoholic beverages.
Subd. 6. Proof of age; defense. (a) Proof of age for
purchasing or consuming alcoholic beverages may be established
only by one of the following:
(1) a valid driver's license or identification card issued
by Minnesota, another state, or a province of Canada, and
including the photograph and date of birth'of the licensed
person;
(2) a valid military identification card issued by the
United States Department of Defense; or
(3) in the case of a foreign national, from a nation other
than Canada, by a valid passport.
(b) In a prosecution under subdivision 2, clause (1), it is
a defense for the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the
evidence that the defendant reasonably and in good faith relied
upon representations of proof of age authorized in paragraph (a)
in selling, bartering, furnishing, or giving the alcoholic
beverage.
Subd. 7. Repealed, 1989 c 351 s 19
HIST: 1985 c 305 art 7 s 3; 1986 c 330 s 6; 1986 c 444; 1987 c
152 art 1 s 1; 1989 c 301 s 13,14; 1990 c 602 art 5 s 2 -4; 1991
c 68 s 1; 1991 . c 249 s 20; 1993 c 347 s 21; 1993 c 350 s 13;
1994 c 615 s 21; 1995 c 185 s 7; 1995 c 186 s 67; 1996 c 323 s
4; 1996 c 442 s 24; 1Sp1997 c 2 s 57
Copyright 1997 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.
Minnesota Statutes 1997, Table of Chapters
Table of contents for Chapter 340A
340A.502 Sales to obviously intoxicated persons.
No person may sell, give, furnish, or in any way procure
for another alcoholic beverages for the use of an obviously
intoxicated person.
HIST: 1985 c 305 art 7 s 2; 1987 c 152 art 1 s 1
q jro SS 01
Copyright 1997 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota.