Memo Updating Comprehensive Plan
l ~
0 ~'lU ~ ~ (Q)
To: City Council and Zoning end Planning Commission
From: Nancy Anderson
Date: July 8, 1999
Subject Upda~ing the Comprehensive Plan
Attached are sections of the Comprehensive Plan that the Planning Commission has
reviewed. The Planning Commission made recommendations for the land use of
various parcels since the last time the Council reviewed the land use issues. These
recommendations will be discussed at the meeting. If you have any questions
regarding the material I please call me.
0
0
- -
~
I I
.
,
0 M [fE~ OJ rrJJt\~ []QJHi~~ ill3l1fOCJ
Hoisington Koegler Group lnc,
~rn
TO: Hopkins Planning Commission and Staff
DA TlE: May 13, 1999
S~JflECT: Comprehensive Plan
:FROM: Mark Koegler
The attached Comprehensive Plan draft contains the changes suggested by the Planning Commission
at the last meeting and other changes suggested by city staff. Please transfer the color Existing land
Use Map and Future Land Use Map to the new text. Additionally, a section on aviation has been
added to the land use chapter. Please review this material and see if you have any other suggested
changes.
Weare currently working on assembling the draft text and maps for the other plan sections. HKGi
is assembling material on parks, downtown Hopkins, and Excelsior Boulevard. City staff is
assembling material on storm water management, transportation, water supply and sanitary sewer.
0 All of this material should be complete and ready for your review within the next 45 to 60 days.
On Tuesday, May 11 t\ the City Council reviewed draft 1 of the Comprehensive Plan. Their
discussion focused primarily on land use issues and during the discussion, they suggested that a
number of issues be referred to the Planning Commission for subsequent review. The following is
a listing of those issues. Their locations are kcyed on the attached map.
li. Issue: Use of property north of 5th Street North, East of Robinwood Lane. This parcel is
currently used for new truck parking. Adjacent land uses include multi-family residential
immediately to the north and commercial (White Wolf, Hopkins House, etc.) across the street
to the south. The City Council discussed two possible uses for the property: high-density
residential as it is now shown on the plan or commercial. The high-density residential
designation is consistent with the contiguous parcel to the north. The possible commercial
designation was discussed due to the shallow depth of the lot.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
2. Issue: Existing single-family residential areas, Area 1 - East of 7th A venue South and both east
and west of 6th A venue South. Area 2 - Generally east of 12th A venue South, south of 1 st Street
South. In both of these areas, the City Council questioned whether the land use designation
should be low density residential or medium density residential. Low density residential would
0 promote the continuation of the existing single-family homes, some of which are in poor
condition. Medium density residential would allow townhomes in the area. Higher density
housing surrounds both of these areas.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
, I
~ .>
Planning Commission Memorandum I"~
May 13, 1999 ~. )
'--/
Page 2
Planning Commission Recommendation:
3. Issue: LRT station site, north of the new Supervalu building, The discussion regarding this area
focused on the potential use of at least part of the property for industrial possibly housing a future
expansion of Supervalu. Two options emerged, first, leave the entire parcel designated as a light
rail (or commuter rail) station site. The second option would be to show the property as
industrial with an asterisk or other graphic symbol to identify fact that a portion of the site is
anticipated to house a new light rail station.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
41.. Issue: Use of property in southern Hopkins abutting Smetana Drive, Paul Steiner owns a parcel
in southern Hopkins, approximately 3.5 acres of which is out of the wetlands and flood plain and
is buildable. The parcel is currently zoned R-fJ?-The City Council discussed two uses, either low
density residential, which would be compatible with Nine Mile Cove or Office, which would be
compatible with the office/industrial uses in Minnetonka immediately south of the site.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
(~-.
5. Issue: Use of property along the north side of reconstructed Excelsior Boulevard from the )
--/
rwoad tracks to just east of Tyler A venue. This area currently has a variety of commercial and
service uses along Excelsior Boulevard and industrial users including Edco and Citrus Systems
along the railroad tracks, The City Council discussion of this area paralleled the Planning
Commission's recent review of this area focusing on locations of future commercial, industrial
and/or business park uses, The issue that needs to be addressed is one of boundaries. Should
commercial uses be restricted to the western end of this area allowing the industrial uses to
eventually front on Excelsior Boulevard? Should the existing industrial areas be classified as
business park promoting a higher degree of improvements and enhanced aesthetics?
Planning Commission Recommendation:
6. Issue: Should a commercial use be allowed at the southeast corner of the intersection of 2nd
Street Northeast and BlaIce Road? The area adjacent to this parcel is identified as industrial and
currently contains a large refrigerated warehouse facility. The City Council would like the
Planning Commission to consider whether or not the commercial parcel should also be
designated industrial or should it retain its commercial designation?
Planning Commission Recommendation:
7. Issue: Land use designation of the parcel immediately east of TH 169 and north of 2nd Street 0
Northeast. This site is currently owned by Supervalu and is used for snow storage. The City
may have interest in acquiring the parcel in the future for the same use. Accordingly, should the
pm"cel be designated as industrial or should it be shown as public?
- j
I
Planning Commission Memorandum
() May 13, 1999
,~' Page 3
Planning Commission Recommendation:
After the Planning ~ommission has had a chance to review and discuss these issues, the Future
Land Use Plan map will be modified. The revised map will be forwarded to the City Council
at a future work session for additional review and comment. With the exception of the issues
noted above, the Future Land Use Plan is consistent with the amended version that was adopted
a few years ago by the City of Hopkins. Per the Planning Commission's past discussion and
general City Council concurrence, the Supervalu North Annex site will be labeled as Business
Park and the refrigerated warehouse building referenced in issue # 6 on the previous page is
shown as industrial.
0
0
I
; 1
()
,'----'"
:::-:-
~;;
(J
II r(~v1 fl BC;,)CC"
\. /)'\\.,9
.
m~ mrlK\' I f~oi~JX1Etll" ~~!J~~jl Gro~1]: hill. (~'
f-GO( ['~ '1)""-/ KJ.3 Nm'l1l1 TlllT<1! Sima!, .."Rtlt<: 100
!iOG [I 'lOOn 2000 3000 t!.OOlO GOOO ,<{5) ./Ju M1imlellpoli!!, MI'If 55110K ~)
~~~~~.....~
SCOlkl: 'j II ::: 20010" M<:uy 13, '1999
-
---
- i . j
o
__~M--r- ~~~ J ~
I "', , t'
, ./'"< ,:P'_,,, "'~""~
,,,:Y>' ~'t"
/.J"":~~ ',""'
, r" ~Jl' '
! ",,"_"<':"'j'~"" It" ~"
e"''''''''- '~
,/'" ," ~t'-, I. '-" .
""'~.,'.. "":.t-~~ "'....."
/, "', /~~""5?, ~l~l(l~_~, ~~ ' ''-.....~~:-"''-,''-
~'" ,/F~- '~' , ~"{\~~ ~~~'"'
lL. "-. <1;:",. i~: """ ~:, j ,.JJ) ..,ar'J;:'/-"
'~ "''''<''1):1 .' DJ //
~'~~~, ",<~ ',,~~..... ,"',L.JC,~ ~~"/
"'M "~')!['~'e',,1\0V~P~1 7
, "'", '-~~ !"~,. 1\ J((
,,,...,,.,,~~-~ ~J
, ..."",,, ,.,.,,/"'"""~' .'
...1 """.............;~~~~/ ~ I
!""'''''', ,....;.r' -"/1~' ·
, ".,~, ,,/ ' '
~".,.., ~ "'~. '".,.,~~." _= "~. ~.,'^-~,,_..~~_ , .~..~__"...~ " I "",.r)rr/J'" _' . ~""'-_..",,".._'''~ v__" "'".~ _,_..v. ....-' .'.Vum _~,.h..
o
CC n LeJl CO) ff ItIT CO) [CD lkfhffiiS)
~ ~J D4TlII'rl'l ";"'"11 rrm[, Jl- M Tlf41J (C'9J10 ,\\1 fW }[i)fJ 1l crI1 [tfI]
\ ~ \1J) lLu L ,~) ~_ \\,,? JJ \S:;! lU .Lw) V \~ ~[ J1 Cg,,-~ III
Draft 2 - l\&ay 179 1999
[l8]~
nWl[IJi'f'
L<8lJ 11,
o Hoisington I(oegler Group, Inc.
I
; I
<<' ]1 ,(j~ "']1 ~D~, ,r!? JD[ . ]L1''' , C)
\JrCOXTI\ n ([J)Jl Ie m~ ,....J1 ~y ([J)JL Ll.(Q)W) lcJlJmC
'fhe foHowing statements summ3lrize the goals oil the City of Hopldns which have guided the
preparation of dus Co~oreheilsive Phm (,Iud to which the City win refer in establishing spending
and action priolities,
JL Ir'w<IlJv:(\')(Cu: lllln~ rCi?i.lfiq'll~nTtu.n:TI1n wd~n]1T(ji((DICr(i\(D1<1lJcrJ[:s;o
HopkuOlS is prninll<lrHy a residcnHal communHy, and its people are its sl:reRlgth. 'fhe Cii.y
h~.s established neighborhoods with wcH-m3intaincd homes, mature vegetation, "mol
decades of personal cmnmitment However, the effects of time, physical deterioration,
changing tastes, madcet competition, 3[1.01, not least, the influence of traffic and nearby
businesses may erode the qmlllity of Ilhcse neighborhoods, and inevocably dUJlnge the
nature of l.he community popul<1ltion. A prdmmry gO:'ll of the City of Hopkins is to work
to protect these mesiden1ial areas.
Strong, weU-maintallllcd neighborhoods protect people's il!1lvestJ.nents in property and
foster a posHive economic development cUmate. Jmproved communication between
neighborhood areas and the City, schools and businesses witH enhance the entire
comnumity,
This goal is supported by an COfnprehcnsive Plan elements. C-'
J
/;0 l[mmpTl'i!lJ'ViE IQl<llJW!Olll@WWl. IF![ilJlli1J!!r.:nlmGo
It is nl.TC to discover a distinci.ive, pedestrian-scalie commerci(ll area set in the heart of
a smon suburban community, but Hopkins ]bas one. Downtown Hopkins and
Mainstreet give the city a strong central focus and sense of place or identity that .many
other communities find very diilficuH to recreate. M2IJor impmvcments have been
made Downtown in recent years through public-private cooperative efforts. 'fhese
efforts shoulid con1linue with more emphasis on the private sector and liess public
financing involvement.
Efforts shouldl be made to l"Ctain existing downtown businesses and aitraci: new
businesses to Mainstrcet. 'fhe CHy should continually monitor the downtown business
climate.
Both the Comprehensive Plian and Strategic Phm support dais goal.
:50 }LmmfPJrc<!])w~ rdl.(p.;t<eTL'fiilJlw5l\~nnJ1~ fcllJ1U<<TI/<IlJJ(' ilJlf0l9<!])ll<e3iCleffilll i!lol<dlu.R3\1:Jrni'dlR mr !.C(D1lflIJ1JITffi€e!t'(\;nmll :3l!t"I2;;\l\So
The City should continue to encomage the improvement of industriali and cOlllil1crciaJ
businesses to ensure that the limited amount of 11l0n-residcntiaJ land in Hoplidns C3Jil be
used to its fun potcntiaJl. A specific focus should be on mdevdopment of loropmties C)
aliong portions of Excelsior Boulevmrd.
Hopkins Comprehensive rlan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 1
,-
n -
. .1 j
0 ~. Bo!saerr. the image armdl ~frnarra~aerr oft' tllRe ~mIrnmunrmnty.
Hopkins retains many of the freestanding, small-town characteristics that were
developed over its IOO-year history, These features are a valuable asset, one that
many communities today are either trying to recapture or create. Over the past
decade, Hopkins has made a number of major improvements, all of which support a
stronger community image, These efforts should continue. The City should develop a
public relations strategy that might include a periodic sampling of resident and non-
resident perceptions about the community.
The Community Image and Land Use Plans address this goal.
5. IB1lllnRd! ~nvn~ nrmvonwemermt, ~omrrrrnfitmermt, ~mrlllPrrnrlle.
The best city plans have no benefit unless the local population is concerned about its
community and has leaders (elected and otherwise) with vision and wisdom. Hopkins
has the ingredients for successful community support as a result of its small-town
character, strong residential neighborhoods and Downtown civic focus. The City
should continue to emphasize the importance of youth and families. Efforts should be
undertaken to foster awareness of the importance of youth to the community and to
support families.
0 6. M~dnnt21nrm Jfns~21H frneaRtfrn. aDJlrll an a~~e]pltabne banann~e !between selJ.'wii~e \lj]lUlann1l:y 2lllllrll
plJ."Ojpledy tmr rrates.
Residents and business people have traditionally supported this aim. Demonstrating
responsibility in fiscal matters, while having obvious local benefits, would also aid the
City in its public relations with prospective residents and business owners. Continued
pursuit of new and expanded businesses and industries is the best way to meet this
goal. The City should continue to foster stability and growth of existing businesses
while encouraging targeted business to locate in Hopkins. An effort should also be
made to develop and implement new business financing programs for redevelopment
and rehabilitation.
All plan elements support this goal.
7. lImprrove CiUJ1ll1rmty :IlRtDams
In 1995, the City of Hopkins assembled a corridor study for Excelsior Boulevard
(County Road 3). Implementation of the planned upgrade of the roadway is well
underway and will continue into the early 2000s, The City should continue to improve
the link between Mainstreet and Excelsior Boulevard and efforts should be initiated to
improve Shady Dale Road. Along major routes, community entrances should be
0 marked with signage, special paving, landscaping, lighting and other improvements
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 2
------- -
; f
5 u:r(,lP;ll1lgu:nTl~n ~lV (C~n[illl~G3(;5~CQlITDIfD@ rt~DJUlnll u:n ~5n 1fnllIl"~gn U:5 CI
In order to properly frame a strategy for moving the community toward a desirable future, it is
important to understand its strengths and weakness, opportunities and threats. When the 1989
Comprehensive Plan was prepared, several methods were conducted to assemble a listing of
these trends and factors. Efforts included a community opinion survey; input from the
Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee, elected and appointed officials, and other members of
the public; discussions with members of the City Planning and Economic Development staff; and
a review of Census data. For the current plan update, the Planning Commission reviewed this
information, incorporated components of the Hoplans Strategic Plan an~ made appropriate
modifications. The community's strengths, weaYJlesses, opportunities and threats were
subsequently reviewed by the public during the preparation and review of the plan, The findings
are summarized below.
~1t]ferrn~lcEns @1f rr-rr@~rrdrrns
1. Sense of Community
Hoplans exudes a sense of community that is found in few Metropolitan Area
communities by virtue of its population size, geographic size, stable, cohesive residential
area, identifiable downtown retail and civic area, community celebration (notably the (-~
Raspberry Festival), and families that have lived in the city for decades. The school
. .-/
district is geographically focused on Hoplans, A sense of pride and identity exists. e
2. Identifiable Downtown
Downtown Hopkins is one of a small number of established central shopping districts in
Metropolitan Area communities, Although its strength in the retail market has declined,
it remains well known and identifiable on a small scale, and a focus of the community.
Several private and public improvements have occurred in recent years,
3. Employment Base
Hoplans has a relatively high number and diversity of jobs for a community of its size.
4. Location
Hoplans is strategically located relative to the City of Minneapolis and other western
suburbs,
5, Access
The City has excellent access via federal, state, and county roadways, freight railroads, C)
and the planned light-rail transit system.
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 3
1
0 6, Variety of Housing Types
Hopkins has a wide variety of housing for people in every stage of the life cycle and
income category.
7. Variety of Development Types
The Community is composed of several types of housing, retail and service businesses,
and industry, public parks, and private golf courses.
8. Attractive Residential Neighborhoods
There are a number of distinct and identifiable residential neighborhoods defined by
roadways, golf courses, parks and creeks.
9. Strong School District
The school district has a strong reputation and is a compelling reason to live in the city.
10. Good Municipal Service Delivery
(j Community opinion surveys have typically indicated a high level of satisfaction with the
delivery of municipal services such as snowplowing, parks, police, and fire protection,
and trash collection. Survey updates should occur on a regular basis.
11. Excellent Community Facilities
Hopkins offers an excellent array of public facilities from parks to special uses. The
City's collaboration with the school district and the City of Minnetonka in the Lindbergh
Center is an example of wise use of public resources. Another example is Shady Oak
Beach, which is also collaboration with the City of Minnetonka. The Art Center and the
Hopkins Pavilion are other examples of facilities that meet the needs of residents as wen
as Metropolitan Area residents and visitors.
12. Active Citizen Participation
Hopkins' government actively involves the people of the community. The City includes
citizen participation in the establishment of policy and the assembly of specific plans.
Examples include the assembly of the Excelsior Boulevard Corridor Study and the
assembly of the Hopkins Strategic Plan.
13. A Tradition of Community Celebrations
0 Hopkins gathers every year to celebrate the Raspberry Festival. This higWy successful
event fosters a sense of community pride and enhances the image of the community.
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 4
--~---
~w (,;i1l1P,~ml(?;~Si (Q)J[ Tf-J[{j))]plll}:llrcnSi ()'
'----"
L Aging lIousing Stock
Mos~ of the Hopkins housing stode was built prior to 1960 and some of]t plior to 1930.
The city has a significant number of smaJ1l, post-war houses that lack mllillY features and
amenities that f;;JmiHes arrno1 im:lividuah": des-in;; in the contemporary market. As these
sl:mctums continue to agc, their desil'abHHy may decrease more rapidly and owners l1ffiay
not be eager 1.0 rdnvesl. in them because their potential is Hmited by their size, floor plan,
and goTage and doset space.
2. Negative Effect upon Housing of mdustry, Business, and Traffic
]In some areas, the land use paUem subjects several residential neighborhoods to the
negative effects of adjacent industry and other bush.1l.esses, and, especially, traffic
associated with business <md high-density housing.
3. Downtown in Need of Coniirmed Improvement
][1.1 recermt years, downtown Hopkins has made great strides in re-establishing its sub-
regiona~ prominence as a commercial and entertainment center. lIn order to see continued
improvement, Downtown Hopldns win need to continue to promote a stable mixture of
re-u.ail and service businesses, offices, government offices, entertainment, and attached ()
housing, Some buildings still need physical improvement and OJ number of auto-oriented
uses need to be deaned up or removed.
4. M::nJor Roadway andlIndusl.rial Areas Divide the Residential Community
The community is divided by TH 169, Excelsior Boulevard (County Road! 3), and TH 7.
m addition, the industrial area along Excelsior Boulevard separates two major residential
neighborhoods from the rest of the community.
5, Ymage of the Community in the Minds of Non-Residents
Some non-residenl:s may have a negative image of Hopkins as a result of their limited but
unfavorable impression of the community as they drive along Excelsior BoulevOJ.rd or
Blake Road nOlth of Excelsior Boulev<1rd. Several high quality Hopldns residential
neighborhoods arc located in l:1hi.s area lmdl are sometimes assumed to be pmt of
Minnetonka,
6. Physical Appeanmce along Cert!'1in Major Traffic Corridors
As mentioned above, the image of ihe Excelsior Boulevard is negative because of its
deteriorated buildings, outdoor storage, lack of hmdscaping, overhead wires, intensive
business operations, and visual noi.se. Because it is the domhmnt image that many people 0
have of the community, this impression trukes away from dlle many positive aspects of the
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 5
=.,.,..".."..,""'""'~~,
I ;
0 community. At the present time, Excelsior Boulevard from Shady Oak Road to 11 th
A venue is being reconstructed. Over the next few years, the remainder of the roadway
will also be improved.
7. Tax Base Constraints
Because the city is nearly fully developed, there is little opportunity to expand the tax
base without redeveloping property. Recent project such as the Supervalu distribution
center demonstrate that redevelopment efforts can lead to increases in the community's
tax base,
(Q)ITDJPl@Jr't1:U1lffilRtRe~ ll@Ir JHItillIPJIDrrn~
1. Access to and from Minneapolis via Light-rail Transit
Historically, two light rail stations were planned to serve Hopkins. At the present time,
there is a great deal of regional debate on the future of light rail transit. Current options
under consideration include light rail and commuter rail, which would utilize existing
tracks on a shared basis. The rail line that passes through Hopkins rougWy parallel to
Excelsior Boulevard is still a candidate rail line, In order to preserve future options, the
Comprehensive Plan update will continue to accommodate a light rail station along
0 Excelsior Boulevard. If a light rail system is built in the future, this station would bring
many people into Hopkins daily and improve access not only from Hoplans to
Minneapolis but also from Minneapolis (and other locations) to Hopkins.
2, A Resurgent Downtown
Downtown Hopkins is clearly on its way back to economic health. It has accomplished
several changes in its economic structure, physical design, and administrative
organization and appears ready to take the next steps toward revitalization.
3. The Future of the Retired Landfill in Southwest Hoplans
This site could be used for public or private recreation andlor open space. However, it
may be many years before the contamination on the site is remediated to the degree that
the property could be accessed by the general public.
4, Improvement of the Excelsior Boulevard Corridor and Associated Industrial Areas
These locations have very good access and visibility along with numerous buildings and
sites, which are in need of improvement or redevelopment.
5. Capitalizing on Hopkins' Self-contained Small-town Image
0 This image is, perhaps, Hopkins' strongest long-term asset and opportunity as it is a
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 6
I
-- ------- "----~~
characteristic of which few other communities can boast. ()
1flhurR;z;TtV;@ f~(QJ IT-11([DIOJE~'lm1:3i
1. Housing Deterioration and Disinvestmen1.
A high percentage of Hopkins housing inl]ts are over 50 years old and many were built in
the same era, Thus, Onere is the possibility of many houses deteriorating at the SaIl\1C time.
Prescrving Hopkins' housing stock and Hs neighborhoods shmdd be a prime consideration
of the City.
2, fudustriaR Obsolescence
A few of Hopkins' industrial plants arc aging and/iOr have physical site constraints l.hat
limit expansion ;;1.001 modlcmization,
3. Downtown Economic and Physical Decline
Although it appears that DowntiOwn Hopkins is on a steady improvement treKlld, the threat
reffi<1ins that businesses might not prosper and buildings could dcteriol"<:J.te.
4. Loss of Families
The threat of widespread physical decline in the housing stock CGupled w:iJh the small C)
size and lack Gf certain amenities in many local hGuses ciOuld lead tQ fewer families in
HGpkins and more singles Oil' childless couples.
5. Rising Local Tax Rate
Hopkins has few oppORtunities to easily increase its lax base, and rising costs in IQcal,
cQunu.y, and schaol district gQvcmments could increase lacal tax rates and propeTlty taxes.
6. DeteriGratian of Public J!nfrastmcture
Hopkins is over 100 years af age, and mosi of its sll"eets and sewer and waier Hnes were
constructed many decades ago. Deteliiorcatian of these facilities is, Ums, a threat
C)
Hopki.ns Comprehensive Plan - Dn!.ft 2 (5/99)
Page 7
-- - - ---- - - - -----
c) Alf1l21n yons @li]F(QlIINllLllaltn @ll1l9 :IT1I (ill illlseilll (Q1 Ii trll~9 f!mmrrll IEmm p n 0 YIlli1lteIITi tl
This section describes and analyzes the major demographic and employment trends in Roplans,
which may influence municipal policy. Table 1 presents data regarding historic and future
counts.
1f21fulle 11
IfDo]l]iRRatnoll119 IBImJlseR1.olldls mrecdl. IEnml]IDnOYJillM~lITl11: Trends
-
A vell"~ge PeJrsorrns!
1leall" ]l'oPIDlllallnmn R-!om;eholldls HmlSelhlGTId Em~lloymerrnt
1940 4,100
1950 7,595
1960 11,370 3,245 3.50
1970 13,428 3,583 3.75
1980 15,556 7,061 2,17 19,100
1990 16,529 7,973 2.07 12,252
2000 16,800 8,200 2,05 12,400
C) 2010 17,200 8,300 2.07 13,750
2020 17,800 8,300 2.14 14,200
Sources: u.s. Census Bureau, Metropolitan Council
"1-
Notes to Table 1:
0 Much of the population growth that occurred prior to 1950 was a result of annexations of
developed or developing property to the City.
(') The number of housing units is increasing in Hopkins but the population is declining as a
result of a shrinkage in the average number of persons per household. This decline has
been occurring since approximately at least 1970 and is judged to be the result of the
departure of children from families residing in detached housing units ( the "empty-
nester" syndrome), a national trend toward later marriage and smaller families, and an
increase in the proportion of attached housing units in the total housing stock. This
change was forecast as far back as 1965 in Hopkins and is being experienced by many
older communities. By 2010 and 2020, the Metropolitan Council projects a small
increase in household size.
0 0 The slow but steady increase in the number of jobs in Hopkins reflects the redevelopment
of certain properties, some of which has been assisted by the City, and a general increase
in intensity of non-residential land use, including office developments,
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 8
-------
(" -"
JF\:DI]1mn~D.~ncrDITll Ct1laL"21C~eIc'"fistncg .- ]913ill) 2',Iilldl ]~MND l)
The following is a tabular summary of the major population characteristics of the City of
Ropldns for both 1980 and 1990 as compiled by the D.S, Census Bureau:
1I'21blle 2
1L~t]crD 2llllldl Jl9~@ Cnn2lTr~e11:eIT'fi~~]es
-
CTIn~n-~c~ell'lis~fics Jl~~~ Jl~~@
Number of Persons 15,336 16,534"
Persons by Gender
Female 55% 45%
Male 54% 46%
Number of Families 3,765 3,827
Number of Households 7,061 7,973
Number of Persons by Age (''j
-,/
0-9 10% 11%
10-19 12% 8%
20-29 28% 28%
30-44 17% 24%
45-59 18% 10%
60+ 19% 19%
Persons by Race
White 98% 95%
Non-White 2% 5%
Households by Person
1 Person
Female Householder 23% 25%
Male Householder 12% 14%
2 or More Persons
Married Couple Family 41% 35%
Other Family
Female Householder 10% 10%
Male Householder 2% 3%
Non-Family Household ('i
Female Householder 6% 6%
Male Householder 5% 7% "--/
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 9
1
r-) CrrnlJlE."adeIr'nSafi~~ n9~MD :il.~~[D
\"'--,~ .I'
Households with Persons under Age 18
Married Couple Family 69% 62%
Other Family
Female Householder 26% 31%
Male Householder 4% 6%
Non-Family 1% 1%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau
JID ijl ITD 1illll a 1ft Ol]ffi ([ijll111. \C! 1lTIBn (ilJ Il1lB aID! <ill JIDrc\Errlln \C ~ii <rY ID!S
The major conclusion and predictions about the population structure in Hopkins are set forth
below:
1. The average household size and average number of persons per housing unit in Hopluns
has been dropping over the past 30 years and is less than the comparable figures for the
Metropolitan Area.
0 2. The average household size and the' total population of the City will continue to decline
slightly, then population will rise slightly.
3. The percentage of adults over the age of 65 will increase steadily through the turn of the
century and accelerate sharply after 2010, when the first Baby Boomers reach that age,
and peale just after 2025.
4. The percentage of adults under the age of 30 in Hopkins will remain relatively steady.
5. There will be an increase in the number and percentage of non-traditional (two parents,
children) households.
6. The percentage of women in the work force will continue to increase, as will the number
and percentage of two-wage earner households.
Points #5 and #6 will place greater strains on the school system, the social service
delivery system, and on businesses such as daycare.
7. The number and percentage of adults with post-secondary education degrees will
increase in Hopluns.
8. The number and percentage of minority-group households will increase in Hopkins.
0 9. The regional market demand for low-cost, low-skill workers will outstrip the supply.
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 10
10. There win be an increasing need for vv'orkers to update and change their job sldH and (')
education throughout their careers.
W(Q)]li)111IJl1Tll1:llCillJOt ~lrlllml ] IT:Jl1Ol]i!)]lCOlYHJG\(i';ID1'U: ITomlJl.(?;0
0 'Vhat should be the response of the city to the expected demand for much morc specialized
housing, social serrvices, (ljad trml1!.lrjlor~nHon for the elderly after the Year 2000, a phenomenon
which may peak and decline Him lhe school construction wave that occurred in the 19505 and
19605?
n As one of its goals, should the City attempt to retain and/or increase the percentage of
families in the community? YJ so, what should be its approach to Hils goal?
<l Al'e the City's land use plan and policies adequate to aHow h to respond to the changing
nature of the post-industrial market? 'lVin the community have a high quality and diversity
of jobs and a low rate of unemployment '!
/-- i
\,~
(\
, )
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 11
~~ ~~~~_~n.n~_ ._=,,"<._
. f 1
.'
0 IL:IDIDlall1IJ t3Je 2lfmcrll }D)~wen@lPlIITffil1;;Iffia
IL2lIITlcdllOse 2ll1llrll ID~wen@tp)mm~rm~ II~~TillIe~
OV~IrallR Patl:tl:~m.
The land use pattern of Hopkins has evolved over the last century and is now well
established. Redevelopment is ongoing in some sectors, especially in the Downtown
and industrial areas. Examples include the recent construction of downtown
attractions such as the movie theaters and the Center for the Arts. Recent industrial
redevelopment includes the former Hennepin County Public W orIes garage, which is
now the home of a new SuperValu distribution center. Only a few undeveloped
parcels of land presently exist. Underdevelopment of sites and more particularly,
inappropriate use of land are the major issues now confronting the community.
JF.~sfi1il~rrntl:fi2.ln N~figlhtll:D~Irlln~~cls
Perhaps Hopkins' greatest asset is its neighborhoods of single-family homes, which
accommodate a mixture of young singles, young families, mature families, and elderly
couples and singles. These neighborhoods give Hopkins its character and
cohesiveness, However, acceptance of some of the smaller, post-war homes may
0 wane as time goes by and long-time residents move out. Protecting these
neighborhoods from inappropriate development and the effects of aging and evolution
as well as preserving a strong social fabric will continue to be major challenges for the
community, In the future, redevelopment may threaten existing single-family homes,
The City needs to consider means to restrict the loss of single-family housing.
Jl}mlVlIIlu:~wJlJllHIoJPlkfilllS
The Downtown has changed over the years from an important and vibrant retail center
to one that serves local convenience needs and certain specialty market niches. The
dynamics of consumer marketing and the transportation network have caused such
shifts in many older central shopping areas. Downtown Hopkins still, however,
possesses a special character. The character of the area can be used to help reposition
it to respond to contemporary market challenges and opportunities but not without the
combination of private and public efforts,
There has been considerable public investment and interest in Downtown in the recent
past, and that trend is continuing. Without question, Downtown Hopkins is one of a
half dozen or so recognizable central community shopping areas in the Metropolitan
Area. It is an asset worth protecting, The community recognizes the importance of
the Downtown and has a strong positive emotional response to the location.
0
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 12
i .
.
.
,
, .
. -
,
,
. -
..
,
.
.
.
.
-
IIoptiDs OnurdK.uaiw PIaD - Daft 2 (5199)
P8F 13
l
0 ITrmclUllsltlrn21n armd! COllll1llrIffilfrrcnall Arreas
Roplans has long been an important center of employment and commerce in the
western suburbs as a result of its streetcar, highway, and railroad service, Industrial
development and redevelopment continue to be important to the community for
purposes of tax base and employment. The City has invested staff time and financial
resources to leverage private investment and is committed to an ongoing effort of
business recruitment and development.
Nat11ll.ll"all Prrotednorm Arreas
There are two locations of special natural significance in Hopkins: Nine-Mile Creek
and Minnehaha Creek. Each is protected by the rules and regulations of a Watershed
District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. In addition, the City of
Hoplans has approved zoning regulations to complement the efforts of those non-
municipal agencies. The Nine-Mile Creek basin in southeast Hopkins is being
protected for purposes of flood protection, wildlife protection, agriculture, natural
beauty, and passive recreation. The Minnehaha Creek basin does not include
agriculture but does include active recreation such as canoeing,
Other natural areas include Meadowbrook and Oak Ridge golf courses, Central Park,
and the Blake School athletic fields.
0 IHI i!ll1ill~il:IDg 2llTIl@ ~e~llcdl ell1l1tu2Jlll N!ell glln fuJi!ll rrlln([D([DtrllII~~1ille~
0 Through the course of the City's growth, several small neighborhoods were
created, each with a distinct character. A number of neighborhoods today are
separated from one another by non-residential uses, roads, etc. Is the integrity and
attractiveness of the residential neighborhoods being adequately maintained? Is
the single-family character of these neighborhoods being sufficiently protected?
0 Should Downtown growth be allowed to encroach into adjacent residential
neighborhoods if it makes for a stronger central business district? Are there some
locations where such encroachment would be acceptable?
0 Are housing maintenance regulations properly enforced?
0 Should commercial development be allowed along Highway 7?
0 Should or can the City increase its financial role in maintaining housing quality?
0 Are single-family homes adequately protected from redevelopment pressures?
0 Making the zoning ordinance flexible enough to allow homeowners on small lots
0 to initiate improvements providing such improvements are not detrimental to the
surrounding neighborhood,
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 14
----
II>>@~wnn~(ij)wnn IIsm.nes l)
0 Should the area included in the Downtown be enlarged?
0 How should downtown fringe areas be redeveloped?
0 Is there a commitment by the City to continue to utilize public resources where
warranted in order to support appropriate redevelopment efforts?
0 Can additional attached housing be allowed in limited locations on the perimeter
of Downtown Hopldns while protecting the integrity of nearby single-family
housing?
IInnQ)lur.s1'1liY alrmcrll ]]1ffiSnruess IISSl111eS
0 What should be the role of the City in protecting housing, which abuts or views
industrial or commercial development?
t:I Along Excelsior Boulevard
D Around the Downtown
D Near industrial areas south of Excelsior Boulevard C)
D Near industrial areas northeast of Excelsior Boulevard and Highway 169.
0 What should be the role of the City in promoting commercial and/or industrial
development and redevelopment, especially along Excelsior Boulevard, east of TH
1697
'.
0 How can the City improve the appearance of its existing industrial areas,
especially along Excelsior Boulevard?
0 Is there a need to increase the amount of industrial land? If so, are there any such
locations that would not have a negative impact on nearby housing quality?
0 How can the City talce advantage of a possible future light rail transit station?
(Q)veJI'alnn C(ij)mmIffi1l1!1lll1lii~y S[lI"1J1le~l!1lJI're JIs81llleS
0 How will the community maintain its family-oriented, small-town single-family-
housing character and image as the bulk of the housing that forms this character
ages and/or becomes less attractive in the market?
()
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 15
,
0 0 How will the City adequately protect the character of existing single-family
neighborhoods?
([J)ttlffieIi IL~llJl.@ 1IJ~~ II~~tIlle~
0 Should the closed landfill site in southwestern Hoplans be used as a public park?
(j
0
_/
Hopldns Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 16
--. --.
1L21II1lilll1IJg~ 2lIill(1j1 JDleveEGJ'Jl]IililleIillll lFll21Iill 0
Hopldns' planned land use pattern is illustrated on the Future Land Use Plan. Because Hopkins is
a fuBy developed community, this plan includes only minor changes from the present
development pattern. Planned changes are outlined below.
The principal emphasis of the Land Use plan is not to malce wholesale changes in the pattern of
development but, rather, to achieve better quality site planning and use the land in a way that
reflects its very limited availability and good access. The policies identified on the following
pages support that position.
1. Existing single-family and two-family housing on the fr'll"nrrngl2!) ~ff rll~'WIDltl~'WIDl between First
Street North and Excelsior Boulevard will be maintained as single-family and two-family
housing. The only exception is the small area of single-family housing lying east of 12th
A venue South and south of First Street South. This area is designated as high density
residential on the Future Land Use Plan. If higher density housing is developed in this area, it
should be owner occupied units,
2. The commercial property along both sides of Shmlly O~nt m.~~a:ll should be redeveloped,
Shady Oak Road north of Excelsior Boulevard contains a mix of restaurant, retail and service
commercial businesses that have inadequate parldng and access. Redevelopment of this area
should be done concurrent with planned roadway improvements and will require the (J
cooperation of the cities of Hopkins and Minnetonka since the common municipal line
meanders through the area. Redevelopment of this area may even require "trading" land
between the two cities in order to create parcels that can accommodate appropriate uses.
This area should be considered as a gateway to downtown Hopldns and accordingly, should
have design elements that echo the improvements along Mainstreet.
3. The fr'(\)Jrmer nanlldlmn sntle smlltlTIn of SeventTIll Street is designated as open space. If the land
becomes suitable for public access, the site could be designated as a future parle.
4. A portion of the inrllllnstdd sfite west of{ Iffiighway Jl(1D!1]) and north of Third Street South is
planned for use as a major LRT or commuter rail station and parking area.
5, The D.lillru1UlstlllnaTI paJrndrrng llok:s located north of Second Street Northeast on either side of Tyler
Avenue should be redeveloped into single family housing. The land lying west of Tyler
should be developed into traditional single-family neighborhood lots. The parcel east of Tyler
might be developed with smaller lots accommodating single-family detached uses,
6. The tlll'.lddng site east ~[ :maRm Rill'21a south of Minnehaha Creek is expected to continue as
an industrial use. The property at the comer of Blake Road and 2nd Street Northeast that is
contiguous to the industrial property may support a commercial use.
C_)
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 17
. .. .
..,. . ~
.
I
. ,
. . ,
. ,
. .
. ' .
.
.'
,
,
.
. ..
.
. ' ' .
.
. .
.
,
.
IDsert l'utbal. , .~wt u. Plan
.
",
.
.
,
I , , ,
.
}
.
.
"
,
, .
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
BopkiDs CompftlbeIIIiw Plan - Dr8ft 2 (5199)
PIp 18.
. . :
.. ,
.
7. The SlDnJl1J~rl>V 21liun N<<Dll'~rlll AJimml:'m: ~liD,lD should be redeveloped as a business park accommodating C"\
a nlixllU"e of office, office showroom and light industrial uses. The area should be developed j
consistent with the City's business park zoning criteria and performance standards.
8. The 2lrca !(J\<<DIT'\!,Rll <<Dfc' El>\cr::eflsH<<Dll' TIl,(1])Dnrr~V,'3Jll'crn (ll1fl)1@ 0illlS~ i!J)J1 1tUnce Jr2tnTIll'<<Dilllcr1l llW21cr::J!w should be
redeveloped to include cOJrnrJJercial lJses alone Excelsior Boulevard and industriill uses along
the railroad tracks. When Excelsior Bmdevard is reconstmcted between the r<J)Hll"08I.d tracks
and B13lke Road, a det21Jled redlcvdopment plan for this area should be prepared,
]R(.((l;sncc]lcr,;mll1:ni8.l,n 1\1" l?;)l~JlTt1tD((])rdm@(Q)rrn. JP((])TIfi.cdj(i')C',
(J The City win work to protect the integrity and long-tenn viability' of its low-density
rcsidentiaJI. neighborhoods and shi.ve to reduce the potenti<l1 negative effect of nearby
cOillJlli1ercial or industrial hmd development through zoning, site plan reviews, and code
enforcement.
() The infiHing of vacant parcels and Um rehabilitation of existing developed hmd win be in
accordance with uses specified in the Comprehensive Phl1ll,
() Incompatible land uses win be improved or mmoved where possible and the hmd reused in
confmmance with the Comprehensive Plan.
0 The City win work to assnre a 8trong and wdl-maintaincd neighborhoods hl order to foster ()
an over;:nll positive economic development climate in Hopkins,
n The City win work to provide an over<J11 mixture ofresidentialland use in the City.
() The City win work to correct n.he dispropmi.iomll amount of muHiple family land uses within
the City.
() The City will work to provide a balance of land uses within the City.
0 The City win seek to provide housing opportunities for people in aU segments of the life
cycle.
n The City win prOi:ect the visual integrity of the Highway 7 corridor through Hoplons by noi:
allowing new commercial uses along the roadway.
() The City win exanline the existing Zoning Code in order to determine if more flexibility is
required for provisions regulating residential properties.
] D)((Jl IYVTln tl:(Ol\;WllTl ] P; (ill]] ik;fl eSi
n On a limi~eo1 basis, the Ci1y win conHn.ue ~o leverage private investmen1 in the redevelopmen1 (,
of 1he Downtown thJcough judicious use of 1ax ilt1lcremenl financing revenues llilld loc;ll capital . )
'-~
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 19
~~._~-
- ,
0 improvement funds.
0 The City will work with Downtown landowners and merchants to improve parldng, access,
appearance, and the l~nd use pattern.
0 The Downtown will be kept in a compact arrangement in order to increase its commercial
function and also to protect adjacent residential areas. Expansion of the commercial area will
generally be limited to areas that do not displace single family housing,
0 The City will continue to offer its commercial structure and sign rehabilitation loan program
targeted to downtown Hopldns as long as it financially feasible to do so and the need is there,
0 On a limited basis, the City will allow the conversion of older single-family homes in
Downtown Hopkins as noted in the Plan to attached, owner occupied housing (townhouses,
condominiums, etc.,)
IIIDltdtnn~trry 2lrrnrll IffiIDlSnIl1le~~ lP'@nilde~
0 The City will continue to actively promote the development and redevelopment of its
industrial areas through marketing and public relations efforts, land use planning, and careful
financial incentives, including tax increment financing,
0 0 The City will strive to leverage its valuable locational assets and create industrial areas,
which have attractive building and grounds, no visible outdoor storage, high floor-area ratios,
and high levels of employment, especially employment in the professional and technical job
areas,
0 The City will attempt to improve the appearances of all businesses in the Excelsior
Boulevard area through public-private landscaping and fencing partnerships and local code
enforcement,
0 The City will carefully study the implications for commercial redevelopment of the planned
reconstruction, widening, and realignment of Shady Dale Road. The objective will be to
create new commercial sites which are appealing to the contemporary commercial market,
which have good access, parldng, and service docldng, and which can be well landscaped.
0 The City will participate in the redevelopment of deteriorated and/or obsolescent industrial
and commercial areas when public financing is detennined to be feasible and necessary,
0 Industrial zoning will be expanded only where and when it would not have a detrimental
effect on a nearby residential neighborhood.
0 The City will set and enforce high standards for all non-residential design. New business site
0 plans will be carefully reviewed for building orientation, parking placement, access, traffic
impact, landscaping, screening of storage, and general architectural appearance,
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 20
-----.--.----
The City will assist owners of new businesses with the process of obtaining funding such as 0
0
Small Business Administration loans and tax increment financing when detennined
necessary and appropriate.
0 When commercial property abuts residential property (especially across a street), extensive
landscaping, fencing and lor berming should! be used to protect the housing.
C([]J Iffi1lItIffi1illrrnn fry S frn.""l1] ~~l1]IT'e Ir@ TIii ~ii es
0 The City will work to unite the core of the City with those neighborhoods that are separated
by highways or non-residential development. Approaches will include bicycle and
pedestrian paths or lanes and bridges.
0 The City will protect the long-term viability of its greatest asset--its residential
neighborhoods--through zomng, land use planning, rehabilitation assistance, traffic
engineering, parks improvements, and replacement and infilling with compatible housing
styles.
C(J)~nlleJl" IL21Il1ldllJse P@lliidies
0 The closed landfill in southwestern Hopkins will be maintained as open space. If it is to be (~\
used as a park in the future, local residents will be actively involved in its programming and v)
design.
<I
(~ "-
~)
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 21
.
0 ~@n&11n<> A~~~~~ TIDInrDll:te~1tn@illl
State legislation enacted in 1978 requires local comprehensive plans to address solar access
protection, The law requires that communities make efforts to ensure that direct sunlight access
to solar panels is not subjected to shading from nearby trees, buildings or other structures. In the
1980s, energy prices and potential fuel shortages focused attention on both passive and active
solar collection systems. Since that time, however, lower energy prices have diminished interest
in active solar energy collection systems. While solar energy issues are seldom discussed during
subdivision reviews today, it is possible that conditions will change in the future. Accordingly,
the City of Hopldns will take the following measures to ensure protection of solar access where
appropriate:
1. Examine the existing Subdivision Ordinance to ensure that it adequately includes solar
energy protection measures.
2. The City will assist homeowners in finding information pertaining to design criteria for solar
access.
3. Consistent with State Statutes, the city will consider variances in circumstances where
hardships are imposed because of the inability of structures to obtain direct sunlight for solar
0 energy systems because of existing zoning and subdivision ordinance provisions.
i
0
Hopkjns Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 22
------------ --~~,~--
,
A " ,10 (J
.~ \ \Y1l1itHCIl (1]) rm
There "n1'e no aviation fadHtics in the City of HOlpJdus, however, the City is within the region's
general airspace that nr.;eds to be protected from potenti:'lJ obs1:ructions to airc navigation. The
dosest airqport facHities to the City of HopJdms is flying Cloud Ailpmt in Eden Pnlrrie and the
MlhmeapoHs/St. Paul Intermatiomnl Airport near Bloomington.
The CHy of Hopkins has a responsibility io protecli- airspace as a p;:nrt of the Comprehensive Plan,
Under MlnIiesoia Statues 360, Hac Statc reguJa~cs the height of structures as they are defined ::Inol
enforced under Aeronautics Rules and Regulations ~mOO,1200 Criteria for Determining Air
Navigation Obs1:ructions. Subparagraph 4(B) st<l.tes:
"objects more ;,han ?-OO feet above the ground or more than 200 feet above the established
airport elevation, whichever gives the higher elevation, within three nautical miles of the
nearest runway of an airport, and increasing in the proportion of the 100 feet for each
additional nautical mile of distance from the airport but not exceeding 500 feet above
ground", is a general obsiruction.
Notification to MWDO'f Aeronautics is required when ,my object as defined above would affect
general airspace,
N@117ffil<<:€2T,((i,(fJll&: Any sponsor who proposes any construction or alteration that would exceed a ,c-\
\ .
height of 200 feet above ground level at the site, or any construction or alteration of greater ,...j
height than an imaginary surface extending upward and outward at a slope of 1 00: 1 from the
nearest point of the nearesi runway of a public airport shall notify the Commissioner at least
30 days in advance.
Loc31 reporting is in addition to any Federal permitting/review process (FAA Fmm 7460-8)
involving a sponsor/proposal.
^- vir::lI.1i:n(QlJ[Il Jp([JJurrcy
It is the policy of the City of Hopkins to:
1. Notify MnlDOT Aeronautics of any structuU"e 200 feet above the ground that could affect
airspace.
2. Work with the Metropolitan AirpOliS Commission in locating needed (ljrpOlt navigational
facHili-lies.
3. Xnclude both Federal and State safety standards when planning the design of any object
related 10 or affecting transportation facilities.
():
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 23
.....'~~~
.
0 IHI ((1J 1J1lS11ITIllfJ1;
A:rm2nYSit~ (l])1f IBlo1illsnrrng S1t@~nf:
Cu.nnerm1 IHlommnnng CormsMReJratllm:lls
The housing stock of the City of Hopldns is described by the following data from the 1990 U.S.
Census of Housing and by the subsequent text.
'1I'~r(]n~ :3
11I~lJ]s:fillTlg CrrllaJlZ1den':fis(rJi~s
CTInmmdelinsu:nc5 I1Io!l]TIdrms Mdro Area
Total Units 8,572 988,735
Occupied Units 7.973 935,516
Vacancy Rate 7.0% 5.4%
Owner Occupied 32,7% 65.0%
Renter Occupied 60.3% 29.6%
0 Single Family Units 3,063 (35.7%) 647,697 (65.5%)
In Buildings with 5+ Units 4,957 (57.8%) 242,752 (24.6%)
Condominiums 1,106 (12.9%) 49,093 (4.9%)
Year Structure Built
Median Year Built 1968 1966
Decade Most Built 1970-1979 1980-1990
Built in 1939 or Earlier 808 (9,4%) 202,998 (20.5%)
Housing Values and Rent
Owner Oce. Units-Avg. Value $103,422 $102,822
Median Home Value $86,100 $88,300
Average Rent $533 $494
Median Rent $520 $479
Source: u.s. Census Bureau
rr-TI.i!DlillSnrmg ~ti!Dd[
Overall, the housing stock in Hoplans is in good condition and there is no section of the
() community that has a noticeable concentration of physically deteriorated units. Although the
"- ," older units located between Downtown and Highway 7 do tend to have more defects and
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 24
econQmic obsolescence than. the newer units, there is apparent pride in Dwnership Df these single- 0
family structures, and they are gencrmly wen maintained.
A great number Df rent,d apariments and tDwnhonJses have been built since the 1950's in
HDpldnD, and proper maintenance af these units is a cancern Df the City, The City daes have
standnrds fDr the maintenance Df rental hausing that gD beYDnd the Building CDde, The
provisiorCJ.D Df the cDde require peliDdic im;pcci.iDns Df rentm units and repair Df identified
deficiencies.
lriDnl\DTIR'iD
One af the unusual facts abaut the HDpkilms hausing stDck is the high percentaBc Df rcnter-
Dccupied units cDmpared tD Dwner-Dccupied units. AccDrding tD data from the MetropDlitan
CDuncil from 1996, 65% Df the hDusing in HDpkins was renter-occupied and 35% Df the units
were Dwner-Dccupied.
][-J[lj])llTI;]liTIl\[:; Affi1(mTl"[!l~lriJ)ilnnj1,y
The medi<m hDme value in HDpkins in 1990 waD slightly above the mctropDEtnn area mean. The
median rent was also slightly above the mediaR1 rent ClOSt. Purchase by first-time buyers Df
housing in HDpkim; frequently DCCurS because Df the numerous sman, older hQmes in Central
HDpkins and mDdest ranch-style homes ill the East End NeighbDrhDDd. Parts Df the Inted(lchcn
NeighborhDad, Park Valley and the Peaceful Valley l\TeighbDrhoods arc (1)1510 affDrdable. ()
Intcrlachen, Park VaHey, and Peaceful VaHey also offer opportunities for move-up buyers.
Much more expensive hDmes are available in the Bcllgrove and KnDUwDDd NeighborhDods. The
relatively large number of rental apmtments and tDwnhouses also offer choices far hDusehalds
WhD dD nDt wish to or cannat affDrd tD purchase hDmes.
The City Df Hopkins Dwns and mainl<1ins 36 dwelling units rented tD low-incDme hauseholds.
They are in two buildings near DowntDwn (76 units in one building, 10 in the Dther).
A smml percentage of lDW incame individuals in Hopldns receive rent assistance through the
Federal ~ectiDn 8 Rent Assistance Program administered by the MetropDlitan HDusing and
RedevelDpment Authority. This program, however, dDes nDt meet the need for housing
affDrdabHity in Hopldns Dr elsewhere as leveRs of funding have been redm;ed annuaUy
throughaut the past two decades.
lo/1[:mrcr;:(E;U, mZ(C~n:n((]lII]~(j;; (L((]I fI.rm~ ]H[((]ITliJRdnns' ][-][mTICIiJ!I1E S'U,([D:trr~
Despite the aging of much af HOjpldn5' hDusing stock and the shDrtage in Dlder units Df SDme
contempDrary convenienceG, hm]se!> generally seB relatively quiddy in HDpkins and rental
vacancy rates are very lDW, ][n 1999, lDC<lJ apmtment uni.t managers repDrted vacancy rates Df
approximately .5%. HDwever, there is a growing concern that the size and design of many JPDst-
VV m: hDuses may cDmbine with the physical deteriDration tD produce a dDwnward spiral Df
cDndiHDns, values and m2lrket response.
(~I
'---'
Hopki.ns Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 25
------ - -------~------_...._..,--_..,'---- -~- ~-- . ,~.....--"^'- ~-- ~-~
--.---------,.-.---------.-.--...----------
. , ,
0 Presently, Hopkins' convenient location and the numerous job opportunities and social/cultural
amenities of the western suburbs seem to be keeping the housing market strong. The City must
take efforts to protect its housing stock from influences such as excessive traffic or incompatible
land uses which could threaten neighborhoods.
~esiidell1ltii21.R Relffi21.\l]mlt2l.tRCill1l ]L02JIDl. 2lllllrll <Grrall1lt IPrr~grram
In response to the need to promote private reinvestment in the aging housing stock, the City has
been administering a program of grants and loans to owner-occupants with lower incomes. For
the past 25 years, this program has assisted in the improvement of over 200 housing units in all
parts of the City. The program is funded by the City's share of County administered Community
Development Block Grant funds.
[Dewellojp)mennt SWlll1l(!ibmrlls
The Hopkins Zoning Ordinance includes five districts that allow detached housing on parcels
ranging in minimum size from 6,000 to 40,000 square feet. Five other districts allow attached
housing including duplexes, four-unit buildings, townhouses, and apartments at densities ranging
from 3,500 to 1,000 square feet of lot area per unit (12 to 43 dwelling units per net acre). The R-
4 and R-5 districts allow for very urban uses with minimal amounts of open area.
IHJ:ounsiin:ng COJl'!lStrndiionn
0 Since 1980, 1,354 new housing units have been built in Hopkins as the City has become nearly
fully developed in its residential areas, and only a modest number of new units have been created
through land redevelopment. The focus of the community is now on housing maintenance. In a
few areas, new construction on infilllots will continue to occur.
lExjp)ededlHIousnrmg Marrket 1frrerrnrlls
In 1992, the City of Hopkins completed a detailed housing analysis. Many of the projections
found in that report are still valid today, Factors still likely to effect the housing market in
Hopkins include:
Rental Market
0 Increases in the older population group (over 75 years old) as well as single-parent families
with lower incomes will create a demand for lower cost rental units and a greater demand for
services.
First-time Home Buyers
0 An expected decrease in fIrst-time homebuyers may cause housing prices to fall based on
supply and demand,
0
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 26
----~-
Move-up Market (' ,
U
0 Continued increases in the middle age group may result in continued demand for move-up
housing. However, the significant decrease in the quantity of first-time homebuyers may
cause problems for those trying to sell their homes to move up.
a If it becomes difficult to sell existing housing, middle age owners may find it necessary to
remodel their existing homes rather than acquire new housing.
Young Seniors Market
0 This group tends to use a variety of housing options such as existing single-family homes,
condominiums, and rental housing.
Older Seniors Market
0 The older seniors, over 75 years old, will grow significantly in the next 10 to 20 years. This
group, whether remaining in single-family homes or moving into other forms of housing will
demand additional services such as personal care, home maintenance and transportation.
0 A significant percentage of the older seniors population has low incomes.
IHI(filt!Il~nnng IIssunes (~)
The following housing issues were identified from observations and from discussions with City
staff and community representatives.
0 What will need to be done to maintain overall housing quality Hopkins?
0 What should be the role of the City in helping to maintain the quality of housing in Hopkins?
0 Should additional renter-occupied housing be discouraged in Hoplans?
0 Should the City reduce the allowable densities of multiple-family residential development?
0 How can the City preserve its single-family housing stock?
IHI([D1illsfirrng IFll21Iffi
The objectives of the Hopkins Housing Plan are as foHows:
1. Preserve the quality of the community's residential neighborhoods.
2. Participate in the development of affordable housing for the elderly so that people who (J
have lived in the community for decades can remain and also to make single-family
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 27
, .
0 houses available for young families,
3, Participate in programs to provide the City's fair share of housing for the economically
disadvantaged.
4. Preserve the supply of existing single-family homes.
N engllnborrllnoo[]l1PJie~l2rr'V.attn~Nm
0 The City regards the preservation and protection of its existing residential neighborhoods as
its most important task. Therefore, the City will work to protect the integrity and long-term
viability of its neighborhoods and strive to reduce the potential negative impacts of nearby
commercial or industrial land development through zoning, site plan reviews, and code
enforcement.
0 The City will strictly enforce its municipal regulations pertaining to housing and yard
maintenance so as to protect residential property.
0 The City will support housing maintenance through continued administration of applicable
programs.
0 The City will continue to enforce its maintenance code for multiple-family housing.
0 0 To protect residential areas adjacent to downtown Hopkins, the Downtown will be kept in a
compact arrangement.
0 The infilling of vacant parcels in and near residential neighborhoods and the rehabilitation of
existing developed land will be in accordance with uses specified in the Comprehensive Plan.
0 Land uses that are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and incompatible
with housing will be improved or removed where possible and the land reused in
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
0 The City will enforce high standards for all multiple-family residential development.
Included will be the aspects of building massing, parking location, access, traffic impact,
landscaping, exterior architectural design, fencing, trash handing, and parking ratios.
0 Both stability and growth of neighborhoods are keys to the success of any economic
development efforts of a city. Neighborhoods provide employees for existing and potential
businesses, a market for the retail sector, and create an image of the community, which is a
reflection upon the local business. Neighborhoods are also a reflection upon a community's
social and economic standards of living and overall quality of life, which in turn impacts
economic growth.
0
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 28
,
------------
-- - -~--- -,~---- - ---- ----~ "-L""__"~_
. .,
]l-][ml(Bllrii\1:3 m.ccrlle'V0rri!llR>>IITm~f(]IJt (j
.
There is a limited number of locations in the community where it may be appropriate to aBow
1u!.d encourage hom;iug redevelopment. In these locations, the City h<JiS indicated its land nse
intentions through the Lond Use Phm and the Zoning Ordinlmce mlld Map. The City win aHow
the private Tm.arket to respond to those 10c2Il controls and will, on a case-by-case basis, consider
financi~J pmi:idpatioICll in housing redlcvdopment projects when that is the mdy mealtJis of
achieving needed and dlemonstrable public benefii.s consistent with this Comprehensive IPlan.
]tITmnSnlfi\fg mOJ!e tcf(j\(p) ]l1rr<dt~wrry
Hopkilr]S win monitor the number of ddedy households in the Cily and will gauge the okmand
for elderly rental and dderly owner-occupied housing units by monthJly cost through surveys
conducted by the Hopkins Housing and Redevelopment Authority. When it is determined tbat
ii.here is a significant housing market ill!. Hopkins ~nd the immediate surrounding connmmity of
ddedy households tho1 is not Hkely to be propedy serNed by the private sector, the Hopkins
f,-JIP~ wiH consider establishing a process to meet that demand. TIle BJR.A win check the
avaiIobihty of outside and Iocall flmd:.; with which to assist a pl.ivate devdoper in IeveragRng
private financine for such a project Prospective sites for new housing for the eldedy should
have transit service nem"by 3u.d be within waJking distance of convenience shopping.
J3[mDsfiUlI['; F02sfislk'BIHlllCiB
Cl The City win participate in the rent assistance program of HennepiJ.ll County and the Twin C)
CHies Metropolitan Housing AUthOliiy and advertise those programs locally.
0 The City will consider using such tools ilS revenue bonds, tax incremeni financing, and
Conummity Development Block Gnmts (along with other public funding sources as may be
available) to provide its "fillr share" of rentru. housing for low-income households, especiaUy
the dderly. The City win enter into such pariIl1I.erships to improve the quality of such housing
and/or ensure that rents remain perpetually within low-income target limits. The City win
not jeopardize the quaJity of existing housing and neighborhoods through the siting of
subsidized housing,
lVJ[((l;~:rc(QJ]pJ({))Jlfin::+1um TLfiw81.1bJlltr; CC(!JJmmrCfOlliJUOlnll:i(({i;i) A(r,u: (JUCA)
The Metropolitan Livable Communi des Act (LCA) was adopted by the State Legislature to
address housine affordability issues facing the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Hopkins chose to
p~l1ticipate in l:he LCA, which makes the City eligible for financial assistance programs not open
to cormnunitics who choose not to particip2lJe.
As ill pmt of the LCA program, dm Metropolitan Council established a set of housing benchmarks
and noted the current index of the community. The following applies to the City of Hopkins:
()
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 29
- . .
0 1l'~lbn~ tQ.
LeA IffierrncEnmaR"nCS
iC~teg@[."l iCn1y lIrmrlle~r ~eJmchmaIr'n<[
Affordability
Ownership Sl% 60-77%
Rental 45% 37-41 %
Life-Cycle
Type (non-sf detached) 72% 37-41 %
Owner/Renter Mix 35/65% (64-67)/33-36)%
Density
Single-family Detached 3.2/acre 1.S-2.9/acre
Multifamily IS/acre 14 - 15/acre
Source: Metropolitan Council
As Table 3 shows, Hopkins has already met the goals of the Livable Communities Act.
0 Hopkins' housing stock is more diverse, more affordable and developed at a higher density than
other communities of similar location and stage of development. As a fully developed city,
Hopkins realizes that the mix of its housing stock cannot be altered significantly. Therefore, the
City is committed to preserving the existing housing stock and enhancing it when appropriate
with new or redeveloped propertie,s which meet the needs of Hopkins' residents,
JI-:IImRsnrrng PIr'im:fijp'TIes
As a part of the LCA program, Hopldns adopted the following principles:
0 A balanced housing supply, with housing available to all income levels.
0 The accommodation of all racial and ethnic groups in the purchase, sale, rental and location
of housing within the community.
0 A variety of housing types for people in all stages of the housing life-cycle.
0 A community of well-maintained housing and neighborhoods, including ownership and
rental housing.
0 Housing development that respects the natural environment of the community while striving
to accommodate the need for a variety of housing types and costs,
C)
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 30
.
(l The availability of a fuB range of sCIlvRces and facilities for it& residents, and the (~ :>
improveI'J.1ent of access to and Hnllmgc between housing illnd employment
JT-)l([])l!TI.9llllnr; Gm'ln~
][n pmticipating in. the LeA program, the City of Hopki!Jls has agreed to the goals identified in
Table 4. AdditionaHy, the City of Hopkim; has adopted action steps reliated to the overall gom of
asm.uing strong 3!nd wen maintained neighborhoods as part of the Strategic Plan for Economic
DeveliopmeuJ I]ud the 199?, Housing All.illysis. The foHowing am activities ideriltificd in iLhor;c
documents that arc perHnetH today.
n VV ork withil1 the provisiom; of the Housing Special Service Distdct l.,egislation to continue
improving properties in the Vif esibrooke aren,
n Continue and/or expmld existing housing programs.
() Examine and improve housing maintemmcc codes and acHvely enforce these codes.
n Utilize the resources of the City's Cornmunity Relations Coordinator to improve the
perception ofthe City's muliti-family housing.
n Facilitate development that will help meet "special housing needs" such as lumdicappcd
units, three-bedroom units, housing for empty-nesters and high markci. valiue housing. ()
'-_0'
n Maintain and improve public infn'l.sirnciure in neighborhoods.
() Monitor the effectiveness of the Tmth in Housing Ordinmlce to ensure that it is helping 1.0
maintain and upgrade residential housing stock,
(, Encourage the llse of existing rent<11 rehabilitation and singh~-family housing Imm prognl.1llS
available throu~h the MillJJ.nesota Housing JPillancc Agency (MHlFA).
() Continue 10 investigate possible sources of funds for the local rental rehabilitation loan
program.
() Continue to offer fIrst-time home buyer mori.gage funds through MHlf1A.
() Continue to offer the Residential nehabiHtation Loan/Grant Program and promote the
progrlli1J1 extensively.
n Continue to locaHy administer the .section (3 Rental Assistance Program.
(, Kdentify those properties that should be demolished and detemnne the proper approach to
ensming their removaL C)
Hopkins Comprehensive JPliUn - Draa 2 (5/99)
Page 31
__________________ ____n_____ ~~=~"_~'~_u
"' ,
0 0 Aggressively enforce the Nuisance Abatement Ordinance/Housing Code in regard to
dilapidated housing units.
In order to meet these goals over the next decade, the City of Hopkins will utilize a variety of
assistance programs. Programs are detailed in the Implementation Section of the Comprehensive
Plan.
0
I
0
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 2 (5/99)
Page 32
~ ,
JF21Irn~S9 (Q)lPlelID S}p)21CC<e 2l1l1lidl1rrc21nnS
()
JIJt1lb4~mtulctiOIrn
Hoplans is a fully developed community with an established park and open space system. From
small parks like the Park Valley Playground to community parks like Central Park, public
facilities offer diverse activities for residents of all ages. Since there is very little vacant land left
in Hoplans, any existing park expansions or new park sites will result from redevelopment
activities. It is not likely that redevelopment activities will result in any significant expansion of
the existing park system.
Since park expansion and new parle construction is not the focus of Hoplans' future park
planning efforts, the emphasis will be placed on maintaining and enhancing the existing system,
Part of the enhancement of the existing system will focus on expanding existing trail
connections. Hopkins is a regional hub of recreational trails. In the future, it may be possible to
expand local trails to provide better links to regional trails as well as to connect local park
facilities and local points of interest.
Palrk, OJpelIIl Space armm 1'lr21ill PoRides
l. Continue to provide a park and recreation system that satisfies the needs of a diverse
C) population.
2, Provide a park and recreation system that supports community identity and serves as a
gathering space for community and neighborhood events.
3. Provide local links to the regional trail system.
4. Establish a trail system that interconnects the city and offers an alternative means of
transportation.
5. Emphasize maintenance and enhancement of existing parks.
6. Continue to collaborate with the City of Minnetonka, the Hopkins School District, Hennepin
Parks and other agencies to provide recreational opportunities for Roplans residents.
7. Utilize the park system to protect natural resources,
CTI21ssiifrrc21tnorm System
Hoplans has a variety of parks that are components of the overall park system. In order to
examine existing parks and to project future parle needs, a uniform classification system is used
in this plan. The following categories have been established:
()
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 1
___wo
.
Classification: Nej(r;TIj1]1}iiDJE'l(1\ilJJll]:R~ }P)~dl: ()
Description: Neighborhood p~rks arc the basic unit of the park system and serve as the
recreational focus of neighborhoods. l'>Jcishborhood parks emphasize infonnal active and
pass]v\,; recreation.
Location Criteria.: % to Yl mjKc distance Rud Iminterruptred by non-residenl.ial roads and ol.her
1 . ~r .
p lYSlC8 omTlers.
Size Criteria: UsuaUy between:; and 10 acres.
Clossifico.tion: s(dJ\lQl{)\nnJ~)~TL'r!:
Dcscripfion: Combining p<1rlm with school sites can fulfill the space requirements for other
classes of parks such <l.S neighborhood, COHUl1Uruty, sports complex and special use.
Locafion Criteria.: De1.ermine!:" by location of school district propcx1y.
Size Criteria: V miaMe
Classification: cCiI])llKllJm1\TIlll\1di~,y Ji?,~Tl'Rl:
Descripiion: Serves 21. brander pU1110se Uwn neighborhood parks. Focus is on meeting
community-based recreational needs as weH as preserving mrique open, space.
Location Criteria: Dctefr.rllned by the quantity and usability of the site.
Size Criteria: U 5mllly between 20 <md 50 acres.
Classijicafion: Spmcu;!J cC([JimCf\l~])lImh
Description: Consolidates heavily prosrmnmed athletic fields and associated facilities to larger
and fewer sites. r---- )
Location Criteria: May either be free5wnding or located in community-wide facilities. ~~_.
Size Criteria: Dctemrincd by demand, usually a minimum of 10 acres.
Classification: i'Jr>>cd:'rl1n USlC Pm'F~ ~nc:] J:!iJ;;~TCe!1l'd([J)Tl1\ J8'.?Hdlli!Ues
Description: Special Use park and recreation facilities may be privately or publicly owned.
Pl.ivatc [adIitics can offer either indoor or outdoor recreation opportunities, usu<llly on a
membership ore fee basis.
Location Criteria: V <:lriable, depends on specific use.
Size Criferia: V mrlable I
Classification: N[,1\D]llI(',~n J~;,eS(QlVllT,oiC~ A]i'C~S
Description: JLmlds set 3side for preservation of signific<mt natmal resources, l"CmlUmt
hmdseapes, open spl1ieG ~Tlld vim~~I aesi:helics.
Location Criteria: Depends on resource aV(ljlabili1.y and opportunity.
Size Criteria: V miablc
Classification: J!~fl!t1lr.t.'Ilj\o 'J[']\'~ftrr cCiDJr[u1lcr.ltflmJlG
Descripfion: L(1Jxl nscdi to effectively tic p;:rrk system components together to form a continuous
pm.k environment and to eonneGI: to points of interest outside of community boundaries.
Location Criteria: Depends on resonrcc <md avnHability and opportunity.
SiziC Criteria: V miabIc
C~ ')
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - DrafL 1 (6/99)
Paec ?
--~_.~~,~~,~""
~
c) JF2Ldn~ty JIll1lveJrntmry
Local recreational facilities are provided by a number of sources, Public parks are perhaps the
most obvious of these sources, however, parks and recreational opportunities provided by other
entities need to be considered in assessing the total park and recreation system, Other entities
providing parle and recreational opportunities in the Hopkins area include adjacent communities,
schools and private facilities.
Scllnoolls
Name: Ensclffihowerr Eliementa:rv School/Community Cen1l:err
Size: 22.6 acres
Type: School-Park
Facilities: Tennis Courts
Ball Fields
Play Area
Open Field
Soccer
Football Field
Name: AUce Smith Eiemenrorv School
Size: 9.7 acres
C) Type: School-Park
Facilities: Ball Field
Play Area
Open Field
Name: Katherine CUJr:ren Elemenmr:v Sdnooll
Size: 6,6 acres
Type: School-Park
Facilities Play Area
Basketball
Name: Eialte Schoon
Size: 52.6 acres
Type: Special Use Facility
Facilities: Ball Fields
Soccer
Ice Arena
Track and Field
Open Field
Tennis Courts
Note: Blake School is a private school facility. As such, its facilities are generally not
available for public use and therefore, should not be included in examining the
(~ total supply of public recreation areas in Hopkins.
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 3
"
()
JI'][lQ1rcpFr:h~[; JrJ~),-,Jlm
I\{amc: IDjn~hi~TI"p;ntT('r~
Size: ),.11. acres
Type: Ndr;hborhood P~rk
Facilities: BaB Field
Open Field
Name: )1] TIJtT,'j(Jl c~ )?>rTlJd~
1"" . 7.0 <Jcres
wlze.
Type: Ncir;hborhood Park
Facilities: Teilllis Courts
B(1sketb~ n
Play Area
Restrooms
Ban Fields
Horseshoes
Picnic Shelter
Open Field
:Namc: .rr:::cnll:}i.'2lll J:>>;m)r-,r~ ,r-,
(<~~ )
"'. n.9 acres
u,lze:
Type: Community P<Jrk
Facilities: Hockey FlIcna
Ball f1icJ.ds (Ligh!:cd)
Soccer Fields
Play Aren
Picnic Axe<1
:Name: .OIl>J:~.:mr(CVmC rPl)Cn.~
Gize: 1.5 acres
Type: Neighborhood Park
Facilities: Undeveloped
Name: p([JlWn~.([])'VVTCil J:I);7~ll.'r~
",. .5 acms
01ZC:
Type: Neighborhood Park
Facilities: V\! alkways
Seating NCCr1S
Downtown GatheRing Space
Name: )3:ll)iJ(j(([]) ]:?$lh']!~
Size: 1.0 acres (,
~ !
-~-_/
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Pa3c 4
-- - --....--....-...---.-,..-. -. _.~--"'-~~---~-
- -- -- -----
.. \
tI ,
Type: Neighborhood Park
C) Facilities: Play Area
Basketball
Name: Hall'lley HOQkins JPark
Size: 3.0 acres
Type: Neighborhood Park
Facilities: Open Field
Ball Field
Hockey Rink
Note: Harley Hopldns Park is on the city's south border. Alder Park, which is an Edina
neighborhood park, is immediately across the street. Alder park contains a play
area and other neighborhood park facilities.
Name: IHInaw~(h~ Oaks
Size: 2.0 acres
Type: Natural Resource Area
Facilities: Undeveloped
Note: Hiawatha Oales was acquired by local residents and deeded to the City in order to
protect mature trees on the property"
Name: lBImtolJ] Park
Size: 3.5 acres
() Type: Neighborhood Park
Facilities: Ball Field
Open Field
Picnic Area
Play Area
Name: ITIDlteJrDad!enParrB~
Size: 2.4 acres
Type: Neighborhood Park
Facilities: Play Area
Restrooms
Ball Field
Basketball
Name: Rf~e[zoiclFneicl
Size: 10,0 acres
Type: Sports Complex
Facilities: Ball Fields
Play Area
Picnic Shelter
Name: Oakes IF'm:"Rr
() Size: 5.7 acres
Roplans Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 5
o.
------- -
., I 0
Type: Neighborhood Park C.)
Facilities: Ball Fields
Hockey Rink
Sledding Hill
Play Area
Picnic Shelter
Restrooms
Tennis
Name: l?nrr~~ V ~Riey IP'~nyp.:rouncl
Size: 1.2 acres
Type: Neighborhood Park
Facilities: Play Area
Picnic Shelter
Basketball
Open Field
Name: phndy OaE~ Reach
Size: 12 acres
Type: Community Parle
Facilities: Swimming Beach
Play Area
Trails (--)
Canoe Launch
Fishing '. ..
Note: Shady Oak Beach is a facility that is jointly run by the cities of Hopkins and
Minnetonlca. The facility is administered by a joint park and recreation board.
The park is located in Minnetonka near the Hopkins border.
Name: Shady 021[r N21tut"e Arcll
Size: 3.3 acres
Type: Special Use Facility
Facilities: Picnic Tables
Off-road Parl'"Jng
Note: This park site consists of a drainage pond area adjacent to Shady Oak Road. Most
of the site is occupied by the open water pond and associated wetland vegetation.
Name: VaUev Padr
Size: 14.5 acres
Type: Community Park
Facilities: Archery Range
Family Garden Plots
Trails
V olleybaH
Picnic Shelter
Basketball (")
"__ /J
.' Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 6
, ., .
,
Play Area
Ci Hockey Rink
Soccer
Ball Fields
Restrooms
Open Field
Otll1eIT" lP'aIT"K aIrndl JRecIT"ea11:noIOl JFadHtnes
Name: MeadovvbIT"ooTII\: Golf CouE'se
Type: Sp~cial Use Facility
Facilities: Golf Course
Note: Meadowbrook Golf Course is operated by the Minneapolis Park Board. A portion
of the course is located in the city of HopY-Jns,
Name: Oak Rndi~e Goll[ iCmuse
Type: Special Use Facility
Facilities: Golf Course
Note: Oak Ridge is a private golf course located in the northern portion of Hopkins.
Name: Minnell]aha iCIT"eeH;;: Preserve
Type: Special Use Facility
Facilities: Undeveloped
0 Note: The Minnehaha Creek Preserve area is land owned by the City of Hopkins and
used for outdoor public works storage. The site could be used as a park in the
future if the public works storage is relocated to another site.
Name: Minnehaha iCIT"ee!!: iCorddoli"
Type: Special Use Facility
Facilities: Undeveloped
Note: This area includes land owned by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
immediately abutting Minnehaha Creek.
1P-'21rrll{: System NeeiU5
A common tool for analyzing a local park system is the application of a population ratio
standard, This standard is expressed as a number of acres of park land per one thousand people
and is used to provide a general guideline for the assessment of existing and future park needs.
For the Hopkins Comprehensive Plan, a standard. of 7 acres of municipal park land per 1000
people has been used as a benchmark for .planning purposes. This standard is consistent with a
range of standards offered by the National Park and Recreation Association. Additionally, the
overall standard has been broken down into the following components:
Neighborhood Park - 2 acres per 1000 people
Community Park/Sports Complex -5 acres per 1000 people
(l
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 7
- ------------
, " -
Standards have not been dircc!ly applied to the other dassificatiOIls used in this IJlml including (~)
school-parks, natural resonrcc 31"CnS, trails, or pdvate park and recreation facilities,
l\Tcighborhood Rnd communhy pm-lc needs can be s~Jisficd in combination with the development
of school facilities provided i.hai. facilities m..c available to both groups. Trail corridors am very
site specific and <l.l'C not included III OVC!"U acreage calculations because ilicy serve as links
between vmions components of the rmrk system. Private facHities are also not ineluded in the
overaH standard because in many cases, they do not have the same longevity enjoyed by public
park Il1ses.
Application of these standm..c1Is yields the fonowing results:
!15;;~~m(jmQ.Tl]l>:i(])lfJ:T:u1ll>:U11.I,'((') Ncc<<n... ?,Irtn:JJl or'<rlIJ:1l~~.b~.flml\ Jt((io([];~.~)
Ex.isiing Std. Applied
Component Acreage Standard to 2000 Pop. Net 1000
Park System 8/..6 ac 7ac/100O 117.6 ae "Jr
<.:;:.J <Ie>
Neighborhood Pnrk 28.? ac 2acl1 000 33.6 ae <5.4 ac>
Communiiy Park 54.4 ac Sac/lOOO 34 ae < 29.6 ac>
School - Park -------------------------------- N 01. AppEcable--------------------------------------------
Natural Resource Arca---------------------- I\T ot A pplicabIe-------------------------------------------- (j
Pli vate P Brks-------------....-----..--......-..........- Not Applicablc---......--..---..-..........---..---------------------
!.1SS.~STQil\C]~: 9ft: KU1\\inl~j"~(Bcjrl.-7,~1t@ (J~([>>jr]]~TI:['Jt~ml\ }r/"?,~m2
Existing Stet Applied
Comnoncnt Acrca1!Q. Sumdarcl to 2010 PoP...:.. Net 2010
Park System 82.6 ac 7ac/1OOO 110.4 ac <37,3 He>'
Neighborhood Park 28.7. ac 7,ac!lOOO 34.4 ac <6.2 ac>
Community Park 54.4 ac 3aellOOO 86.0 ae <31.6 ae>
School - Pm"Ie -------------------------------- N 0'1. App Ii cablc---------------------------------------------
Natural Resource 1\rle~>-----------------~---N ot Applicable---------------------------------------------
firi vale Parks--------------------------------- I"J at Applicabl c---------------------------------------------
()
'----_.r'
Hopl'J.ns Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Pazc 3
'"~, .,M"""'''''''''' .. ~~"~u__,..,, 0 ~
10, .'
Assessm.en~ of IB'uhllIre Neeru- 2020 (PoQui21tioE1l. L. 7.800)
C) Existing Std. Applied
Component Acreage Standard to 2020 Poo. Net 2020
Park System 82.6 ac 7 ac/1000 124.6 ac <42 ac>
Neighborhood Park 28.2 ac 2acll 000 35.6 ac <7.4 ac>
Community Park 54.4 ac 5acll 000 89 ac <34.6 ac>
School - Park --------------------------------N ot Applicable---------------------------------------------
Natural Resource Area---------------------- N ot Applicable---------------------------------------------
Private Parks--------------------------------- Not Applicable---------------------------------------------
Neighborrhood Parks
Standard: 2 acres per 1000 people
Comments: Neighborhood parks are recreational facilities that are intended to serve populations
residing within a '12 mile radius of the site. These facilities typically contain open space areas,
which accommodate uses such as field games, court games, play equipment and other uses,
Although five acres is generally recognized as a minimum size for neighborhood parks, smaller
0 tracts of land can be used due to natural conditions or in areas where larger land parcels are not
available.
Existing Supolv/Need: Hopkins currently has ten sites that are categorized as neighborhood
parks ranging in size from .5 acres to 5.7 acres. Application of the recommended standard for
neighborhood parks results in a deficiency of 5.4 and 7.4 acres in 2000 and 2020 respectively.
The standards indicate the need for additional neighborhood park areas, however, closer
examination of Hopkins reveals that the City probably does not need to add park areas to serve
existing and future needs. Hopldns contains three public school sites that accommodate
neighborhood park needs. These sites along with Alder Park in Edina provide convenient access
for all residents. Almost every home in Hopkins is located within '12 mile of an existing
neighborhood park. The only exception is the extreme northern portion of the community lying
north of the Dale Ridge Golf Course. This area is completely developed precluding the potential
of adding an additional neighborhood parle. If the golf course is ever redeveloped in the future,
an additional park site could be acquired at that time.
Community Parks
Standard: 5 acres per 1000 people
Comments: Community parks are recreational facilities that serve as focal points of community
recreational systems, As such, they typically provide facilities that appeal to a broad spectrum of
users. Activities may include athletic complexes, archery, fishing, nature study, hHdng,
C) picnic1dng and other uses. Community parks commonly contain facilities that are designed to .
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 9
-,.l
appcaJI to both active Elud passive users within onc park site. The location of communil.y parks is r-'
usuaUy established based on topography and other natura][ featm"cs aud on accessibility via thc Cj)
local road ll1ctwork.
Existing StlQ.ply/Nced: I".Jtopkins cun'cnlly has [our sites that are classified as community parks.
They indude Ceni.nd Park, M(i.ctzold Field, Shady Oak Beach and Valley Parle. Ccntr(ll Pade and
Mactwk] Field consisi: prcdorninntcly of athletic field areas, Both of thesr: sitr:s (lXr, used
intensively for aduh and YOHih spori.::; programs. AdditionaUy, Central Park is the home of the
Hopkins Pavilion that acconnllodates indoor ice hockey and indoor soccer. V 3lley Park, contains
passive and natural arc(!s in (JckUtion to acliive pursuits such as volleyball, basketbaU !"Iud archery.
Shady Oak Beacb, a facility run jointly wilh the City of IVlinnetonka, is an area tha1,
ncco&n1odatcs swimmine and fishing. Jxn. 1998/1999, the facility was totally reconstructed with
ne\"I\' buildings, a new parkjn~ lot, and land <lnd waler miented play areas.
Applic<ltion of the standard for community pm"ks calls for an additional 29.6 to 34.6 acres of land
from 2000 to ?,O?,O. Because of the developed nature of the community, adding community park
land win be difficuH. However, two future oppmtunitics cxiSL The southern portion of Hopkins
cont<Jins (l. hmdfiJJ ::;ite that has been closed for a long peliod of time. At the present time the site
1135 not been c1em:ed by State agencies [or any type of use. As a result, the property is fully
fenced and it contains a mcthm.1Jc collection system. At some point in the future, the propelty
may become available for public use, Vvhen tiils occurs, the site could be developed ;:w a
community parle. The second fiJtnre opportunity involves the Minnehaha Creek Preserve Area
that is owned by thf; City of Hopkins. If it becomes unnecess;:lxy to continue to use tllls property ('
as a public works she, it could be incorporated as a new community parle. \,,)
1lTl'mfUlc
Hopldns is a hub for the regional trail network. At the present time, the City is the location of
the junction of two Ie~s of the Southwcsi. Hennepin LRT TraiL These tr(Jil segments foHow 27
miles of abandoned rmilroadl beds stretching from Hopkins to Victoria and from Hopkins to
Chanh<lsr>en. The trail ir> ten fcct widc and is surfaced with comrmctcd crushed Hmcsi.one.
Grades aliong the trail arc generally 5% or less which malees them ideal for biking, walking, and
nmninr;. Hennepin Jr<Jrks operates the trail for spxing, smmner and faU usage. Currently,: the
park and ride lot along Excelsior Boulevard at 8th Streeij: is used as a trailhead. Plans arc
cUlTcnHy being formulated to mlocmc the trailhead to the cast nero: the old railroad depot site.
]Tn the fl~turC, addii:iomd rcgiona~ trml segments are planned east of TH 169. Plans caU for the
insi.aHali:ion of a re~ional iraillinc nmninr; nori.h (llong the east side of TH 169 through the City of
SL Louis Park 8ud then connecting to trails in the City of Minncapolis, It may also be possible
to extend the trail ;:IIloU8 ExccliGior J3',ol1lcv<Jrd as a 10C:ll trail to the SL Louis Park border. Other
local 1.r8jl13 wiB !1llso be addc(1 <CIS rend recous1mci.ion projects occur in the future. Examples
include Excelsior Boulevard, portions of which arc now under consuuction and Shady O;:llc
Roact
C~)
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft li (6/99)
Page 10
--.-.- ----. ~----
- -~
n '- "
}Park lRecommem:liations
II Based on the analysis information presented in the Park System Needs section, input from the
~-_./ public and the Hopkins Park Board and considering the direction provided by the policies that
are contained in the plan, the fonowing recommendations are offered:
l. Develop the landfill site andlor the Minnehaha Creek Preserve area as community parks.
Both of these sites have the potential to serve as community park areas, If the landfill
becomes available for public use, it could accommodate needed soccer fields and other active
facilities. Should the Preserve area become available. it could be used for a combination of
both passive and active pursuits. The area adjacent to the creek could be used passively for
trails and natural habitat, Other areas of the site could accommodate active facilities such as
soccer fields, The City should prepare master plans for both of these potential park sites in
order to identify appropriate uses.
2. Work with other governmental units to install a trail and pedestrian bridge over Excelsior
Boulevard to provide a direct link between segments of the Southwest Hennepin LRT trail.
3. Work to establish a series of local trails that connect to the regional trails. Incorporate trails
as part of all major road improvement projects such as Shady Dale Road and Excelsior
Boulevard. Examine higher volume local roadways for potential off-street trail installation,
4. Upgrade and improve all park buildings to ensure ADA accessibility.
5, Coordinate improvements for the Shady Dale Nature Area in conjunction with the pending
0
, roadway improvements. Examine the feasibility of installing a trail around all or portions of
the pond area.
6. Pave hockey rink areas for summer use.
7, Preserve open space along major roadway cOlTidors. Add landscaping along the Excelsior
Boulevard corridor on city owned land along the south side of the roadway.
()
Hopkins Comprehensive Plan - Draft 1 (6/99)
Page 11
,. ~[iI
co
Q) l~y'
~~ \~~jJ=~8
Q)t5
~.C i '
01;)
co.-
ol::Cl
~ co-o
ol::Q)
i ~ ~ Q)ol::
C en
C....
.- Q)
--- -- :215
---
~~
~.
~
~
.~ G
G
\
1
\
\
\