Memo- CSAH 73/5 Intersection Task Force/City Council Joint MeetingMemorandum
Public Works Department
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Steven J. Stadler, Public Works Director
Copy: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager
Date: October 20, 1999
Subject: CSAH 73/5 Intersection Task Force /City Council Joint Meeting
WORKSESSION JOINT MEETING AGENDA - Attached
BACKGROUND
On December 15, 1998 City Council adopted the recommendations of the Task Force.
In order to better prepare for discussions with Hennepin County, staff analyzed the
traffic carrying capacity of the preferred design and explored additional alternatives that
could be acceptable to the Task Force. On March 31, 1999 the Task Force met to
review the traffic data, potential impacts on design and discuss strategy for staff
discussions with Hennepin County and City of Minnetonka. The City of Minnetonka
agreed with most design elements of the preferred alternative. City of Hopkins and
Minnetonka staff then met with Hennepin County in late July to discuss the various
design elements of the preferred intersection design. There was agreement on some
elements and strong County opposition on others.
RECENT ACTIVITY
Staff and BIKO Associates prepared a concept intersection design based on the design
elements that were agreed to by all parties. (A list of the various design elements and
the Hennepin County responses is included in the attached September 22 Task.Force
meeting notes) This concept design drawing was presented and discussed at a
September 22 Task Force Meeting. Jim Grube, Hennepin County Transportation
Department Director also attended this meeting. The Task Force met again on October
6 and came up with several items which would be required in order for the City to
approve proceeding with the concept design presented at the September 22 meeting.
The Task Force will meet with the neighborhood on October 20 to present and discuss
the Task Force's work to -date. The results of this meeting will be shared with City
Council and staff at the worksession.
TASK FORCE - REQUIRED ITEMS IN ORDER TO APPROVE CURRENT DESIGN
Include plan for CSAH 5 traffic calming options in order to improve corridor
appearance and Tower vehicle speeds
Signal system must include decorative signal poles and mast arms (mast arm
lengths must be kept to a minimum, no street name signs mounted on mast -arms)
An agreement with Hennepin County ensuring no further road expansion plans for
an agreed upon period of time.
Design would include extending the raised center median past Manitoba Rd in order
to prevent cut - through traffic.
Color concept plans will be available at the worksession.
ATTACHMENTS
Meeting agenda
Concept plan presented at September 22 Task Force Meeting (Plan which
incorporates design elements approved by all parties)
September 22, 1999 Task Force Meeting notes
October 19 memo to Ed Anderson - information for use at neighborhood meeting
Original Task Force- recommended, City Council- approved intersection plan,
including design goals and design elements
AGENDA
October 26, 1999
6:30 — 7:30 PM, Raspberry Room B, Hopkins City Hall
73 & 5 TASK FORCE / CITY COUNCIL
JOINT MEETIN G
"To create a Hopkins response to issues surrounding the area of
Minnetonka Boulevard (Co.5) and Hopkins Crossroads (Co. 73)."
1. Status Report — Intersection design implications of Henn. Co.
and Minnetonka responses.
2. Discussion Topics:
a) Hopkins response and position relative to further
discussions.
b) Neighborhood reactions /response.
c) Next Steps?
- Neighborhood Discussions
- City to City Discussions
- Council Discussions
- Commissioner Discussions
Task Force Members:
Ed Anderson
Tom Hance
Jerry Lavin
Jeanne Searles
Ross Bartz
Fran Hesch
Chuck Redepenning
Herman Strauch
Staff:
Steve Mielke, City Manager
Steve Stadler, P.W. Director
Jiin Liddy, Police Captain
* *CONCEPT PLAN PRESENTED TO TASK FORCE ON SEPTEMBER 22 **
VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST CORNER.
HENNEPIN COUNTY DISCUSSION PLAN
-.0././..' J7f✓ 32
CSAH 5/73 INTERSECTION STUDY
City of Hopkins
I3iko Associates, Inc.
MEETING NOTES FROM:
CSAH 73/5 TASK FORCE MEETING - September 22, 1999
Attendees:
Task Force Members
Mayor Chuck Redepenning
Council Member Fran Hesch
Ed Anderson
Ross Bartz
City Staff
Steve Mielke, City Manager
Steve Stadler, P.W. Director
Jim Liddy, Police Captain
Tim Griffin, BIKO Associates — City Consultant
Hennepin County Staff
Jim Grube, P.E., Transportation Department Director
MEETING SUMMARY:
Steve Stadler reviewed the results of discussions with Hennepin County and City of
Minnetonka staff regarding the Task Force- approved intersection design. The various design
elements and neighborhood requests are listed below along with the Hennepin County
response and a staff comment.
Monument in the center of the intersection: Both county and Minnetonka staff are
opposed. This is non - negotiable with the County.
Landscaping and trees to give appearance of narrow lanes: No County opposition to
enhanced landscaping. Staff is looking into the ability to plant trees /shrubs on the wider
end sections of the center medians.
Narrow lanes: Hennepin County agreed with using minimum state aid standard lane
widths (11 and 13 ft) vs. the "desirable" lane widths (12 and 14 ft).
Intersection "table ": An intersection table is a slightly raised (about 2 ") intersection
pavement used for traffic calming. Hennepin County is opposed to this — it is non-
negotiable. An acceptable alternative is to construct a concrete pavement intersection
area with inlaid paver bricks to create a more - pronounced pedestrian crossing area and
contrasting intersection center area to give a non - standard appearance.
Bike /pedestrian paths: Off- street paths are acceptable and encouraged by Hennepin
County. Mr. Grube mentioned special county funding that may be available to offset the
costs of the pedestrian ways.
Concrete curbing throughout intersection area: This would be included in the intersection
design/construction. Some storm sewer construction would also be required in the curbed
areas.
• Place "no entry" signs at the neighborhood streets to eliminate cut - through traffic:
• Hennepin County is not opposed to this idea. They would like more detail on the type of
sign and exact placement on the County right -of -way.
Sign and enforce weight restrictions on the County roads. Hennepin County would not
allow this. It is not possible to restrict truck traffic on a County road that has been
improved with state aid funds.
Install traffic signals on posts, not arms or wires. Hennepin County staff initial response
was that signals must be on mast arms in order to be consistent with all other county
signalized intersections. This was a safety issue for the county and non - negotiable.
However, at the task force meeting Jim Grube mentioned that he would consider post
mounted signals at the corners and on the medians. City staff is attempting to clarify the
county position with Mr. Grube and will report at the next meeting. The city of Minnetonka
is opposed to signals without mast -arms.
Unique intersection signage. Hennepin County is not opposed to street signage that is
unique in both lettering style and location. The typical county signage would be
approximately 2'x10' green /white street signs mounted on the signal mast arms.
Unique signal pole /mast arm design. Hennepin County is not opposed to this. However,
if the poles and mast arms are special then the city would have to stock replacement
poles in case of knockdown. Standard poles and mast arms could be painted a dark,
non - obtrusive color as was done on Excelsior Boulevard.
Hennepin County staff insisted that the intersection improvements include dedicated left turn
lanes on CSAH 73. Without the left tum lanes the intersection would not meet the required
• level of service or qualify for state aid funding.
Mr. Griffin, BIKO Associates, presented the attached color drawing which depicts one
possible intersection concept based on design elements that are acceptable to both
Hennepin County and City of Minnetonka. Both cities could use Municipal State Aid funds for
the majority of design and construction costs. However, the State Aid Office will require that
a right turn lane be installed for westbound CSAH 5 to northbound CSAH 73 if the
intersection level of service falls below level "D" in the future. Attached is a hand -out
provided by Mr. Grube describing intersection levels of service.
Mr. Grube mentioned that a narrower intersection could be constructed if the improvements
were temporary. Temporary improvements would mean the same lane configuration but the
signal system components would be refurbished from county stock, the pavement would be
asphalt without special color or texture treatments and the medians would also be asphalt.
The members of the task force in attendance preferred the permanent improvements. The
preference was based on,the ability to construct a very unique looking intersection with the
permanent design.
There was some question regarding the required length of the tum lanes. City staff will
investigate and report to the task force at the October 6 meeting.
The next task force meeting was scheduled for October 6 at 10:00 a.m. The meeting
• adjourned at 1:30 p.m.
AMY
Memorandum
To: Ed Anderson, CSAH 73/5 Task Force Member
From: Steven J. Stadler Public Works Director
Date: October 19, 1999
Subject: Information for Neighborhood Meeting
Public Works Department
P
I've provided two original color copies (I applied "white -out" to correct lane markings
and configuration) of the proposed intersection concept design. They are the same
drawings that were handed out to task force members at the last meeting. I've also
provided 10 copies of black/white versions for handouts, if you desire.
I've followed up with Jim Grube, Hennepin County Transportation Department Director
on a few issues. The issues and his responses are shown below.
Use of decorative light poles and mast arms. Jim Grube does not want to allow the
use of decorative signal components. They are in the middle of trying to get the
City of Minneapolis to standardize their County road systems (about 300
intersections) and he feels allowing this exception would be detrimental to their
efforts with Minneapolis. So, we'll have to fight for non - standard, decorative
components. I enclosed a copy of a couple examples of decorative poles and mast
arms. The county would allow standard signal poles painted a subdued color
(black, brown, green).
County agreement to no further improvements. Jim Grube agreed to provide a 10-
year commitment to no further road expansion projects, i.e., additional lanes,
widening, turn lanes, etc. The County would still be able to do overlays, shoulder
improvements and other maintenance work Keep in mind that the County
commitment on the installation of an additional right turn lane for westbound CSAH
5 to northbound CSAH 73 is to defer installation to when /if the intersection level of
service falls to an unacceptable level.
Option for street name signage. Jim confirmed that he is still open to alternatives
for street name signage. The signage would not have to be the standard
green/white large placards attached to the signal mast arms:
Traffic calming techniques to lower speeds on CSAH 5 east of intersection. I did
not speak with Jim Grube on this issue. However, I should have some sketches at
•
the October 26 Council worksession to show some possibilities. Of course, County
acceptance of traffic calming, unless it is really passive, could be another challenge.
Project schedule. The County currently has an intersection improvement project
funded in their Capital Improvement Plan for the year 2001. The cities could "
support this timeframe, as well.
1 hope this information is helpful to you as you meet with the neighborhood. Please
give me a call at 939 -1338 (fax 939 -1381) if you'd like anything else.
b'r
NEI
gare
•
I
•;
•
•1
■
f
IIPj
8 t i
gait ‘jaiiI 'W a 0 Adi
7 iiitiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii I
it r r, Ir A *��► ill - fif
`ail ,- M M . ', AM AMP W • 11111V -
•
DESIGN GOALS
The planning and design process developed f or this study included a high level of community
participation activities. Prior to the initiation of this study, City of Hopkins residents,, officials,
and staff formed the 73 & 5 Task Force. Some of the Task Force .members represent the
neighborhoods that would be directly impacted by intersection 'improvements.
In addition to ,conducting research on area traffic volumes, area road improvements, accident
occurrences, and approaches to traffic calming, the Task Force developed goals to guide this
study of the intersection and possible approaches to preserving livability and neighborhood
character, while attempting to meet both regional and local transportation needs.
Design goals developed by the Task Force are outlined below:
Eliminate neighborhood cut through traffic
Improve safety for pedestrians _
• Improve aesthetics of the intersection
Improve accessibility and safety and Level of Service for all transportation modes by:
decreasing traffic volumes
- providing for safer intersection movements
- decreasing . speed
Eliminate confusion at the intersection
Reduce frequency and severity of accidents
Improve neighborhood access to roads
Support regional transportation needs
Minimize costs to the City
Minimize property acquisitions and impacts on adjacent properties
•
CSAH 5/73 Intersection Study
Page 4
RECOMMENDED CSAH 5/73 INTERSECTION DESIGN
' DESIGN ELEMENTS, •
The 73 & 5 Task Force's recommended intersection'design plari is illustrated on the following
page. It is referred to as the Kansas City Style Boulevard Intersection and includes the following
elements:
Intersection Design and Geometrics:
A monument (approximately 10 feet in diameter' at the base) in the middle of the
intersection;
An intersection speed table (approximately 1.5 inches to 2 inches high);
The existing lane configuration is maintained with two approach lanes on all intersection
legs;
An 11 foot-wide inside approach lane for exclusive left -turns and an 16 foot -wide outside
approach lane for through movements and right - turns;
A raised, planted median (minimum 12 feet wide) on all four legs of the intersection that
does not contain a left -turn storage bay';
Left -turn radii to accommodate 40 -foot Wheel Base (WB) vehicles and minimum 30 foot -
wide radii on all corners of the intersection; and
• Traffic signals for through and right -turn movements mounted on decorative posts installed
at the corners intersection, and traffic signals for the exclusive left -turns mounted on the four
faces of the monument.
Landscape Design Elements:
• Extensive landscaping (wildflowers and large field stones) along all four legs of the
intersection to reflect design elements that already exist;
Minimum 10 foot -wide pedestrian and bicycle circulation paths along the west side of the
north leg of the intersection, the east side of the south leg, the north side of the west leg,
and the south side of the east leg;
A plaza on the northwest corner of the intersection; and ,
• Textured, colored pavers defining the pedestrian crosswalks and the intersection speed table.
Initial Requests
Attached to this report is a listing of department requests for the year 2000 budget. The initial requests
were approximately $250,000 over our established limit for the 2000 budget. Departments were than
requested to postpone projects, eliminate programs or reduce needs for the year 2000. After this process
we are at a current request of the maximum established budget for the year 2000. This includes a small
contingency amount for the unresolved salary and benefits agreement for the year 2000. After the
contracts are settled we may need to return to the departments and ask for further cuts. Attached you'll
fmd a list of items departments cut out of their 2000 program budgets.
The new program budgeting has been established. Attached is a listing of programs with affiliated
revenues. We are requesting departments to provide each program's activities and objectives.
PUBLIC WORKS
The public works department shows an increase over last years' budget of 5.8 %. Included in this
increase is $105,000 for the fire station roof maintenance and exhaust system. Without this capital item
public works would actually have decreased its' budget needs in the year 2000. Some of the decrease is
derived from moving approximately $30,000 of street cleaning costs to the Storm Sewer fund. One
reason we clean the streets is to ensure the storm drainage system is clear of debris. The Storm Sewer
fee increase has enabled us to cover this cost. There was also an increase in charges to the utility funds
for street maintenance and public works administration. Public works has always had program budgets
established therefore they have historical information on their programs.
FIRE
The fire department shows a 3.9% increase over last years' budget. Included in this is the request for a
repeator at a cost of $25,000. The direct salaries in this department went down due to a reallocation of
time spent on specific programs. At the same time medical calls have increased along with the costs
associated with them. This may be associated with the turn over in the police department. The programs
for the fire department include emergency medical, fire prevention and fire suppression.
FINANCE
The finance department shows an increase over last years' budget of 16.5 %. This increase includes
reclassifying the finance clerks at cost of approximately $10,000. The other significant change is an
increase in the equipment allocation for finance of $2,500. The programs for the finance department
include benefit administration, budget, cash management, debt management, general accounting,
payroll, risk management, tax increment fmancing administration and utility billing. Debt management,
TIF administration and utility billing are reimbursed entirely from other funds.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
The administrative services department shows an increase over last years' budget of 26 %. This increase
is directly associated with the information technology position established in 1999. The programs for
administrative services include administration, legislation, agenda, personnel, information services,
capital improvement planning and wellness.
CITY OF HOPKINS
CATEGORY
EXPENDITURES
Unallocated expenditures
City Council
Administrative Services
Finance
Legal Services
Community Services
Police
Fire
Emergency Preparedness
Public Works
Recreation
Community Development
TOTAL
REVENUE
Unallocated Revenues
City Council
Administrative Services
Legal Services
Finance
Community Services
Police
Fire
Emergency Preparedness
Public Works
Recreation
Community Development
TOTAL
NET COST (RETURN)
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Budget
1999
$ 169,045
110,510
261,519
110,862
119,010
690,125
2,770,317
565,995
9,210
1,720,961
488,988
142,122
7,158,664
6,391,911
Proposed
Budget
2000
$ 122,341
97,846
329,696
129,151
121,020
705,339
2,865,667
588,079
9,292
1,821,124
492,772
136,396
7,418,723
6,641,923
FUND 101
Percent
Change
- 27.63%
41.46%
26.07%
16.50%
L69%
2.20%
3.44%
3.90%
0.89%
5.82%
0.77%
-4.03%
3.63%
3.91%
-
90,000 100,000 11.11%
5,000 3,600 - 28.00%
286,115 293,750 2.67%
274,338 279,350 1.83%
57,300 57,800 0.87%
4,000 4,500 12.50%
35,000 20,800 - 40.57%
11,000 13,000 18.18%
4,000 4,000
7,158,664 7,418,723 3.63%
$ $
•
PERMANENT STAFFING
City Council
Administrative Services 5.00
Legal Services 4.65
Finance
Community Services 3.95
Police 10.30
Fi re 37.50
Public Works 0.90
Recreation 27.74
Community Development 9.96
TOTAL 2.00
102.00
Many part-time, seasonal and temporary positions
CITY OF HOPKINS FUND 101
PROGRAMS
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Proposed Proposed Proposed
Direct Expenditure Indirect
Revenue Budget Support
CATEGORY Budget 2000 Budget
Unallocated expenditures
City Council
Health and Welfare
Administration
Legislation
Agenda
Personnel
Information Services
Capital Improvement Plan
Wellness
Benefit Administration
Budget
Cash Management
Debt Management
General Accounting
Payroll
Risk Management
T.I.F. Administration
Utility Billing
Legal
City Hall Cleaning
City Hall Maintenance
Activity Center Community Use
Senior Activities
Teen Programs
Activity Center Maintenance
Receptionist
Assessing Information
Homestead Information
Property Valuation
Special Assessments
Charter & Council Administration
Licensing
Purchasing
Records Management
Elections
Building Code Inspections
Fire Inspections
Heating and Plumbing Inspections
Housing Inspections
Restaurant/Hotel Inspections
Miscellaeous Inspections
$ $ 122,341 (122,341)
90,996 (90,996)
6,850 (6,850)
134,437 (134,437)
15,807 (15,807)
50,339 (50,339)
27,283 (27,283)
71,628 (71,628)
25,985 (25,985)
4,217 (4,217)
15,515 (15,515)
17,697 (17,697)
7,656 (7,656)
3,600 48,998 (45,398)
33,870 (33,870)
5,415 (5,415)
100,000 121,020 (21,020)
6,198 (6,198)
159,835 (159,835)
10,000 52,748 (42,748)
3,000 101,383 (98,383)
6,900 (6,900)
69,641 (69,641)
43,295 (43,295)
200 86,397 (86,197)
100 32,594 (32,494)
85,060 (85,060)
19,981 (19,981)
16,100 (16,100)
7,000 8,532 (1,532)
9,440 (9,440)
200 7,954 (7,754)
29,672 (29,672)
85,875 109,351 (23,476)
28,625 34,221 (5,596)
57,250 68,807 (11,557)
28,625 45,738 (17,113)
28,625 33,976 (5,351)
57,250 74,221 (16,971)
CITY OF HOPIKINS
CATEGORY
PROGRAMS
FUND 101
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Proposed Proposed Proposed
Direct Expenditure Indirect
Revenue Budget Support
Budget 2000 Budget
Patrol Operations
Property Room Management
Heat Team
Police Reserves
Investigations
Metro Drug Task Force
Pawn Shop Management
Police Outreach
Chemical Health Commission
Police Counter Act
Public Safety Answering Point
Reception & Records Checking
Systems & Records Management
Emergency Medical Service
Fire Prevention
Fire Suppression
Emergency Preparedness
Public Works Building Maintenance
Equipment Services
Public Works Administration
Engineering Services
Streets and Alleys
Street Cleaning
Snow and Ice Removal
Seal Coat Zone
Sidewalk Repair
Traffic Signs and Signals
Street Lighting
Parks
Tree Service
Adult Recreation
Youth Recreation
Various Recreation Programs
Shady Oak Beach
Committee Liason
Zoning Acitivities & Enforcement
Sign or Fence Permits
Miscellaneous Planning
Community Development Activity
144,500 1,635,711 (1,491,211)
28,090 (28,090)
57,357 (57,357)
24,654 (24,654)
96,100 306,347 (210,247)
75,091 (75,091)
17,800 22,693 (4,893)
3,800 78,855 (75,055)
8,048 (8,048)
32,134 (32,134)
9,000 256,462 (247,462)
4,400 92,912 (88,512)
3,750 247,313 (243,563)
6,300 71,106 (64,806)
7,800 84,954 (77,154)
42,700 432,019 (389,319)
4,500 9,292 (4,792)
2,250 (2,250)
100 29,991 (29,891)
1,800 98,263 (96,463)
16,500 239,708 (223,208)
37,682 (37,682)
144,148 (144,148)
158,053 (158,053)
34,041 (34,041)
116,050 (116,050)
300 154,584 (154,284)
1,800 507,684 (505,884)
1,300 132,637 (131,337)
42,975 (42,975)
64,975 (64,975)
84,840 (84,840)
69,310 (69,310)
9,430 (9,430)
3,000 61,789 (58,789)
1,000 13,148 (12,148)
23,340 (23,340)
28,689 (28,689)
TOTAL $ 776,800 $ 7,418,723 (6,641,923)
TOTAL $240,760
ACTUAL CUTS FOR THE 2000 BUDGET
Amount Explanation
101 -41100 -665 $3,000 Yearly allocation for Open House
101 - 41100 -636 $1,640 Only 3 Council Members for National Conference
101- 41200 -582 $2,000 Expert and professional
101 -41200 -665 $2,000 Miscellaneous
101- 41400 -588 $2,000 Legal civil action suits
101- 41500 -584 $6,000 New phone service
101 - 41500 -544 $1,000 Structual supplies
101 - 41550 -503 $3,167 Part -time help for Activity center
101- 41620 -503 $3,500 Part -time or intern for records management
101 -41640 -583 $2,000 Contractual services for health inspections
101 - 41640 -637 $1,000 Meals and lodging
101 - 41640 -750 $6,500 Two drafting tables and chairs
101 -42700 -500 $60,805 New Information Technician Position for police
101 -42800 -503 $3,600 Part -time salaries
101 - 42800 -542 $1,000 General supplies
101 - 42800 -636 $1,230 Conference fees
101- 42800 - 612 $4,800 Lease of 4x4 truck
101 - 42800 -740 $5,000 Rebuild command center
101- 42860 -790 $7,000 ID badge maker
101 - 43100 -563 $1,000 Maintenance and repair for public works bldg.
101 - 43100 -750 $1,500 Six conference room chairs for public works
101- 43200 -790 $4,000 Floor scrubber for equipment services
101- 43300 -582 $1,000 Expert and professional for public works admin.
101 -43400 -501 $2,200 Overtime for streets and alleys
101 - 43400 -503 $4,600 Part -time for streets and alleys
101 - 43400 -567 $2,000 Maintenance and repair - streets and alleys
101 - 43400 -790 $8,700 Tack oil emulsion applicator
101 - 43450 -501 $2,000 Street cleaning overtime
101 - 43450 -xxx $21,568 Portion of street cleaning to be funded from Storm
101 - 43500 -xxx $26,183 Moved salaries back to Refuse Fund where original
101 -43600 -547 $8,000 Street materials and supplies for seal coating
101 -43600 -607 $7,000 Seal coating
101 -43650 -616 $5,000 Construction costs for sidewalks
101 - 43700 -501 $3,000 Overtime for traffic signs and signals
101 - 43700 -547 $1,000 Street materials & supplies for traffic signs & signal
101 -43950 -563 $1,000 Maintenance & repair for tree equipment
101 -45100 -509 $2,000 Part -time salaries for ice rink
101 - 46100 -5XX $19,267 Moved salaries back to ED Fund where originally
10146100 -582 $2,500 Expert and professional for community development
Revenues
State Aid
Federal Grants
Licenses
Charges for services
Concessions
Donations
Total Revenues
Expenditures
Salaries, Wages and Benefits
Salaries and Wages
Fringe Benefits
Materials, Supplies and Services
Professional & Technical Services
Utilities and Maintenance
Operations
City Support Services
Supplies and Materials
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture and Equipment
Other Equipment
Equipment Allocation
Total Expenditures
Reimbursed Expenditures
Net Total Expenditures
Indirectly Funded Amount
PUBLIC WORKS BUDGET
Revenues and Expenditures
Projected
Actual Actual Actual Actual
1996 1997 1998 1999
$ 14,010 $ 14,010 $ 18,508 $
33,286
5,745
10,203
617
1,169
15,796
9,368
316,824
105,105
11,243
234,236
617
1,169
15,796
3,265
71,007
1,591
5,451
1,100
24,793
Budget
1999
16,651 $ 15,000 $ 15,000
17,000
3,000
35,000
856,104 907,253 940,011 958,521 957,480
237,517 233,833 240,611 292,355 288,508
21,791 56,187 32,140 30,700
305,690 304,484 293,162 328,400
66,637 81,577 89,987 92,200
19,425 8,678 44,294 37,107
225,431 165,910 192,101 # 209,825
5,800 563 -
42,843 18,234 19,595 8,932 9,100
117,250 128,710 128,710
1,819,040 1,798,857 1,934,303 2,040,202 2,082,030
(231,591) (280,584) (315,118) (421,169) (436,305)
1,587,449 1,518,273 1,619,185 1,619,033 1,645,725
1,571,653 1,502,477 1,548,178 1,594,240 1,610,725
Budget
2000
1,000
5,800
Percent
Change
93.33%
21,800 - 37.71%
972,792 1.60%
283,949 - 1.58%
32,100
335,050
90,250
38,375
214,370
1,800
25,000
139,122
2,132,808
(477,717)
1,655,091
1,633,291
4.56%
2.02%
- 2.11%
3.42%
2.17%
174.73%
8.09%
2.44%
9.49%
0.57%
1.40%
DEPT 43000 PUBLIC WORKS
CATEGORY
EXPENDITURES
Public Works Building Maintenance
Equipment Services
Enterprise Administration
Engineering
Streets and Alleys
Street Cleaning
Snow and Ice Removal
Seal Coat Zone
Sidewalk Repair
Traffic Signs and Signals
Street Lighting
Parks
Tree Service
TOTAL
REVENUE
Public Works Building Maintenance
Equipment Services
Enterprise Administration
Engineering
Streets and Alleys
Street Cleaning
Snow and Ice Removal
Seal Coat Zone
Sidewalk Repair
Traffic Signs and Signals
Street Lighting
Parks
Tree Service
TOTAL
NET COST (RETURN)
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Approved
Budget
1999
91,701
264,523
55,297
146,382
181,879
31,935
106,560
143,861
481,505
122,711
1,645,725
- $ 2,250
19,371 29,991 54.82%
98,263 7.16%
239,708 - 9.38%
37,682 - 31.86%
144,148 -1.53%
158,053 - 13.10%
34,041 6.59%
116,050 8.91%
154,584 7A5%
507,684 5.44%
132,637 8.09%
100
500 1,800 260.00%
23,000 16,500 - 28.26%
300
1,500 1,800
10,000 1,300
35,000 21,800
1,610,725 $ 1,633,291
FUND 101
Proposed
Budget Percent
2000 Change
1,655,091 0.57%
20.00%
- 87.00%
- 3731%
1.40%
1,
PERMANENT STAFFING
Proposed
Budget Budget
CATEGORY 1999 2000
Public Works Building Maintenance 1.500
Equipment Services 2.600
Enterprise Administration 1.350
Engineering 1.970
Streets and Alleys 2.671
Street Cleaning 0.200
Snow and Ice Removal 2.035
Seal Coat Zone 1.556
Sidewalk Repair 0.080
Traffic Signs and Signals 0.640
Street Lighting 0.600
Pa rk 6.590
Tree Service 1.960
TOTAL 25.750 23.752
MUNICIPAL BUILDING BUDGET SUMMARY
Revenues and Expenditures
Projected
Actual Actual Actual Actual
1996 1997 1998 1999
Revenues
Miscellaneous $ e $ $ $ $ m $
Expenditures
Salaries, Wages and Benefits
Salaries and Wages
Fringe Benefits
72,829 78,628 78,140 82,284 80,163 82,030 233%
23,446 19,421 20,927 25,175 25,186 25,391 0.81%
Materials, Supplies and Services
Professional & Technical Services 11,404 7,324 4,592 3,432 1,500 3,875 158.33%
Utilities and Maintenance 94,311 120,242 121,563 128,645 116,000 110,100 -5.09%
Operations 575 (112,518) 323 200 600 500 46.67%
City Support Services 3,251 2,047 2,371 4,243 6,138 6,139 0.02%
Supplies and Materials 10,785 11,843 11,265 7,473 12,300 12,500 L63%
Capital Outlay
Buildings & Structures 105,000
Furniture and Equipment 1,592 10,000 10,000 -
Equipment Allocation 624 624 624 498 - 20.19%
Total Expenditures 218,193 126,987 239,805 262,077 252,511 346,033 37.04%
Reimbursed Expenditures (100,000) (100,500) (122,100) (180,600) (177,275) (180,000) L54%
Net Total Expenditures 118,193 26,487 117,705 81,477 75,236 166,033 120.68%
Indirectly Funded Amount 118,193 26,487 117,705 81,477 75,236 166,033 120.68%
The Municipal Building Department is made up of two programs. They are Cleaning and Maintenance.
Budget Budget Percent
1999 2000 Change
o
DEPT 41500 MUNICIPAL BUILDING FUND 101
EXPENDITURES
Cleaning
Maintenance
REVENUE
CATEGORY
TOTAL
TOTAL
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
$
Proposed
Budget Budget Percent
1999 2000 Change
$ 6,198
159,835
75,236 166,033 120.68%
NET COST (RETURN) $ 75,236 $ 166,033 120.68%
Cleaning
Maintenance
TOTAL
PERMANENT STAFFING
1.30
0.70
2.00
FIRE BUDGET
Revenues and Expenditures
Projected
Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Percent
1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000 Change
Revenues
Licenses, Fire $ 1,275 $ 1,240 $ 1,725 $ 1,348 $ 1,300 $ 1,300
State Aid 52,670 50,900 53,048 54,000 54,000 55,000 1.85%
Current Service 1,645 6,867 1,135 1,271 2,000 1,500 - 25,00%
Total Revenues 55,590 59,007 55,908 56,619 57,300 57,800 0.87%
Expenditures
Salaries, Wages and Benefits
Salaries and Wages 170,595 164,587 169,591 183,111 179,876 173,317 -3,65%
Fringe Benefits 96,807 96,907 104,928 106,022 103,489 102,813 -0,65%
Materials, Supplies and Services
Professional & Technical Services 9,983 3,152 5,882 3,569 4,000 5,000 25,00%
Utilities and Maintenance 26,473 26,677 33,512 23,645 23,173 25,500 10.04%
Operations 23,785 25,977 34,223 29,553 27,715 27,950 0.85%
City Support Services 11,876 6,559 14,743 46,075 46,066 46,067 0.00%
Supplies and Materials 48,501 46,134 35,360 37,307 # 48,751 54,800 12A1%
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture and Equipment 546 6,990
Other Equipment 9,668 10,706 2,300 2,300 25,000 986.96%
Equipment Allocation 120,000 130,625 130,625 127,632 -2.29%
Total Expenditures 397,688 381,245 525,229 562,208 565,995 588,079 3.90%
The Fire Department is made up of three programs. They are Emergency Medical Services, Fire Prevention and Fire Suppression
Indirectly Funded Amount (342,098) (322,238) (469,321) (505,588) (508,695) (530,279) 424%
DEPT 42800 FIRE
REVENUE
Licenses, Fire
State Aid
Current Service
CATEGORY
EXPENDITURES
Emergency Medical Services
Fire Prevention
Fire Suppression
TOTAL
TOTAL
NET COST (RETURN)
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Budget
1999
565,995
1,300
54,000
2,000
Proposed
Budget
2000
$ 71,106
432,019
84,954
588,079
1,300
55,000
1,500
57,300 57,800
508,695 $ 530,279
FUND 101
Percent
Change
190%
1.85%
®25.00%
0.87%
4.24%
Emergency Medical Services
Fire Prevention
Fire Suppression
TOTAL
PERMANENT STAFFING
I
DEPT 42860 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUND 101
CATEGORY
REVENUE
Civil Defense Reimbursement
NET COST (RETURN)
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Projected
Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Percent
1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000 Change
EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Employee Benefits $ 3,600 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 3,600 $ 3,600 $ 3,600
Materials, Supplies and Services 5,220 4,609 3,893 4,613 5,610 5,692 1.46%
Capital Outlay
TOTAL 8,820 6,109 5,393 8,213 9,210 9,292 0.89%
4,500 4,000 4,000 4,773 4,000 4,500 12.50%
$ 4,320 $ 2,109 $ 1,393 $ 3,440 $ 5,210 $ 4,792 -8.02%
Emergency Manager
Emergency Coordinator
TOTAL
Item Requested
PERMANENT STAFFING
0.20
0.20
0.10 0.10
0.20
0.10
0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
SIGNIFICANT EXPENDITURES
2000 CAPITAL OUTLAY DETAIL
Badge maker $ 7,000
0.20
Dept. Manager Adopted
Proposed Proposed Budget
0.20
0.10 0.10
0.20
0.10
Revenues
Miscellaneous
Capital Outlay
Furniture and Equipment
Total Expenditures
Reimbursed Expenditures
Net Total Expenditures
Indirectly Funded Amount
FINANCE BUDGET SUMMARY
Revenues and Expenditures
The Finance depai lucent is made up of nine programs. They are Benefit Administration, Budgeting, Cash Management,
Debt Management, General Accounting, Payroll, Risk Management, Tax Increment Financing Reporting, and Utility Billing.
Projected
Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Percent
1996 1997 1998 1999 1999 2000 Change
$ 19,742 $ 15,541 $ 17,837 $ 2,641 $ 5,000 $ 3,600 28,00%
Expenditures
Salaries, Wages and Benefits
Salaries and Wages 154,827 167,553 170,745 176,927 170,005 183,330 7.84%
Fringe Benefits 39,830 39,713 48,881 48,038 47,584 48,695 2,33%
Materials, Supplies and Services
Professional & Technical Services 3,303 4,733 10,725 1,453 4,150 3,245 -21,81%
Utilities and Maintenance 2,285 9,980 8,715 11,455 11,300 12,216 8A 1%
Operations 7,035 6,834 8,426 9,385 9,830 9,884 0,55%
City Support Services 1,407 8,066 8,172 8,199 0,32%
Supplies and Materials 4,613 7,391 3,714 6,139 5,000 5,080 1.60%
3,314 15,500 16,500 16,501 18,479 11.99%
213,300 239,518 266,706 277,962 272,542 289,128 6,09%
(115,050) (121,000) (121,275) (153,960) (160,180) (159,977) -0A3%
98,250 118,518 145,431 124,002 112,362 129,151 14,94%
78,508 102,977 127,594 121,361 107,362 125,551 16,94%
DEPT 41300 FINANCE FUND 101
CATEGORY
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Proposed
Budget Budget Percent
1999 2000 Change
EXPENDITURES
Benefit Administration $ 15,515
Budget 17,697
Cash Management 7,656
Debt Management -
General Accounting 48,999
Payroll 33,870
Risk Management 5,415
T.I.F. Administration
Utility Billing
TOTAL
REVENUE
Charges for Services
TOTAL
NET COST (RETURN)
112,362 129,152 14.94%
5,000 3,600 -28.00%
5,000 3,600 -28.00%
107,362 $ 125,552 16.94%
Benefit Administration
Budget
Cash Management
Debt Management
General Accounting
Payroll
Risk Management
T.I.F. Administration
Utility Billing
TOTAL
PERMANENT STAFFING
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.10
1.15
0.70
0.10
0.10
0.95
3.95
Revenues
Miscellaneous
Expenditures
Salaries, Wages and Benefits
Salaries and Wages
Fringe Benefits
Materials, Supplies and Services
Professional & Technical Services
Utilities and Maintenance
Operations
City Support Services
Supplies and Materials
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture and Equipment
Equipment Allocation
Total Expenditures
Reimbursed Expenditures
Net Total Expenditures
Indirectly Funded Amount
$
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES BUDGET
Revenues and Expenditures
Projected
Actual Actual Actual Actual
1996 1997 1998 1999
$
159,633 183,659
36,560 43,413
5,127 650
1,641 706
17,189 19,904
7,290 6,535
4,133 5,299
231,573 260,166
(19,550) (20,000)
212,023 240,166
212,023 240,166
$
198,671 205,347
50,562 54,272
3,761
1,335
21,618
7,162
5,753 6,670 6,670
3,500 4,284 4,286
$ 105 $
21,256
1,425
17,053
7,707
4,591 #
Budget
1999
5,016
1,428
23,189
7,799
6,548
292,362 322,604 309,237
(22,125) (46,260) (47,718)
270,237 276,344 261,519
$
Budget
2000
Percent
Change
198,316 262,942 32.59%
55,985 74,867 33.73%
2,725 - 45.68%
1,825 27.81%
26,905 16.02%
8,211 5.28%
5,685 - 13.18%
500 - 92.50%
5,748 34.12%
389,408 25.93%
(59,712) 25.14%
329,696 26.07%
270,237 276,239 261,519 329,696 26.07%
The Administrative Services Department is made up of seven programs. They are Administration, Legislation, Agenda, Personnel,
Information Services, Capital Improvement Plan and Wellness.
DEPT 41200 CITY ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Proposed
Budget Budget Percent
CATEGORY 1999 2000 Change
EXPENDITURES 37
15,807
Administration $ 134,437
1
Agenda ,239
2 ,28
Personnel 2
Information Services 25,985
Capital Improvement Plan
Wellness 4,285
6 26.07%
TOTAL 261,519 329,696
TOTAL
NET COST (RETURN)
FUND 101
261,519 $ 329,696 26.07%
Administration
Legislation
Agenda
Personnel
Information Services
Capital Improvement Plan
Wellness
PERMANENT STAFFING
TOTAL
1.80
0.20
0.75
0.45
1.15
0.25
0.05
4.65