The URL can be used to link to this page

CR 06-07 Accept Feasibility Rpt, Order Public Hearing, 2006 Street Imp Project 05-10 CITY OF January 3, 2006 m Council Report 2006-007 HOPKINS ACCEPT FEASIBILITY REPORT ORDER PUBLIC HEARING 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 05-10 Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: "Move that Council adopt Resolution 2006-002, Resolution Orderinq Public Improvement Hearinq. 2004 Street and Utilitv Improvements. City Proiect 03-10. This action continues an assessable project for street upgrading. Overview. At its September 20, 2005 meeting, the Hopkins City Council authorized Bolten and Menk, Inc. to prepare a feasibility study concerning street improvements on 1st Street South from 1ih Avenue South to 19th Avenue South, 18th and 19th Avenues S. south of Mainstreet, and 20th Avenue South north of Excelsior Boulevard. The report is complete and is now submitted to Council for review and further action. A summary of issues is provided here, but staff will provide a detailed summary of the report at the scheduled Council meeting. Primary Issues to Consider. . Scope of improvements . Public input . Costs and assessments . Project budget . Schedule . Staff recommendation Supportinq Information. . Feasibility report . Resolution 2003-101 Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: N/A Y/N Yes N/A Source: CIP Council Report 2006-007 Page 2 ~nalvsis of Issues . Scope of Improvements Proposed street improvements include complete reconstruction of the project area with asphalt pavement and concrete curb and gutter. Proposed water main upgrades are limited to the voluntary water service replacement program that was instituted in last yeats street improvement project. This project shared the cost of replacing water service from the water main to the right of way line between the resident and City. The City would pay 1!3 of the pipe and installation costs. Proposed sanitary sewer improvements include minor reconstruction of manhole tops to match street grades and 2 main line spot repairs on 20'h Avenue south. Proposed storm sewer upgrades include moving catch basins into the cub line and adding additional catch basins where needed to improve drainage. . Public Input A public information meeting was held on December 19, 2005, and a resident survey questionnaire was sent in the mail. Responses and feedback gathered through the returned questionnaires have generally been against the project due to cost. At the public meeting, city staff explained the project in greater detail including cub and gutter and the assessment policy. While not enthusiastic with the project, the residents were much more understanding of the need for the project after the meeting. Based on this response, we do not anticipate heave opposition to the project. The input received from the meeting and the questionnaires will continue to be used and addressed throughout the final design process should the project be approved. . Costs and Assessments The total estimated project cost is $894,338. This includes a 10% contingency and engineering! administration costs at 25%. Of this amount, approximately $372,000 is subject to the special assessment process based on the staff recommendation to implement a cap assessment rate of $60.23 per foot and $4,818.40 per unit. A detail of costs is included in Appendix A the feasibility report. The City's standard assessment policy provides for abutting property owners to be assessed 70% of actual street reconstruction costs. The cap is based on 120% of the average of the three previous similar projects. The per unit cap is based on the $60.23 per foot cap multiplied by an average 80 foot lot in the unit assessment area. Project Budget The CIP estimated budget for the proposed project is $825,000. Council Report 2006-007 Page 3 . Schedule Sept 20, 2005 Dec 19, 2005 Jan 3, 2006 Feb 7,2006 Mar 21, 2006 May 2, 2006 Jun 6, 2006 Jun 6, 2006 Jun 26, 2006 October 2006 Staff recommendation Order Feasibility Study Neighborhood Meeting Approve Feasibility Study, Order Public Hearing Public hearing, order project, and final design Approve plans & Specifications, Authorize Bidding Accept bids, Order Assessment Hearing Assessment Hearing Award construction Contract Begin construction Complete construction Staff recommends accepting the feasibility report and ordering a public hearing for February 7, 2006. CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2006-002 RESOLUTION ORDERING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT 05-10 WHEREAS, the City Council authorized and directed the City Engineer to prepare a report with reference to the aforesaid improvement, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has caused to be prepared the aforesaid report for improvements on First Street South from 1 ih Avenue South to 19sth Avenue South, 18th and 19th Avenues South south of Mainstreet, and 20th Avenue South north of Excelsior Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of $894,338.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on Tuesday, the 7th day of February, 2006 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 1010 First Street South at 7:30 P.M and the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of said hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 3rd day of January 2006. By Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT # 05-10 December, 2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOLTON & IVIENK, INC. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 12224 Nicollet Avenue. Burnsville, MN 55337-1649 Phone (952) 890-0509 0 FAX (952) 890-8065 December 29, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hopkins 1010 1st Street South Hopkins, MN 55343-7573 Re: 2006 Street and Utility Improvements City Project No. 05-10 BMI Project No. Tl6.21739 Council Members: In accordance with your request, the following Preliminary Engineering Report has been prepared for the improvements of the following streets: · 18th Avenue South, from Mainstreet to the cui de sac . 19th Avenue South, from Mainstreet to the cui de sac · 20th Avenue South, north of Excelsior Boulevard . 1st Street South, from 17th Avenue South to 19th Avenue South As a part of the study for this area, the various public utilities have been reviewed regarding their capacity and structural integrity. Necessary utility improvements have then been recommended where appropriate. The total estimated project cost is $837,825.00. During the process of studying the existing conditions within the project areas, meetings were held and input was received from area residents, Public Works personnel and the City's Engineering staff. We would like to acknowledge the cooperation and information received and thank all parties for their support in helping us better understand the problems and concerns within the project areas. Sarah Rippke, Project Engineer, and I will attend the January 3, 2006 Council meeting for the purpose of presenting this report and responding to any questions or concerns that you may have. Respectfully submitted: BOLTON AND MENK, INC. ~G<<-l.-- A-- 7H~~ Marcus A. Thomas, P.E. Associate Engineer MANKATO, MN . FAIRMONT, MN . SLEEPY EYE, MN . BURNSVILLE. MN . WILLMAR, MN . CHASKA, MN . AMES, IA www.bolton-menk.com An Equal Opportunity Employer I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CERTIFICATION SHEET I hereby certifY that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. '---141cvr ~ It 7l.CM-<"-<.- Marcus A. Thomas Date: I z-Iu/or Lic. No. 26499 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TITLE SHEET CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................2 Streets................ .............................................................................................. .......... 2 w atermain. ................................................................................................................4 Sanitary Sewer. . ..... ............... ............ ........................ ................................................ 4 Storm Sewer ........ ......................................................................................................5 PROPOSED IMPROYEMENTS..........................................................................................6 Bituminous Streets........................................................................................... ......... 6 Watermain. ................................................. ............................................................... 7 Sanitary Sewer ..........................................................................................................8 Storm Sewer ..............................................................................................................9 Sidewalks ................................................................................................................ 10 Driveway Aprons .................................................................................................... 10 Lawn Sprinkler Systems .........................................................................................10 Street Signing and Striping .....................................................................................10 Turf Restoration ...................................................................................................... 10 Lighting................................................................................................................... 10 QUESTIONNAIRES .......................................................................................................... 10 ESTIMATED COSTS ........................................................................................................ 11 ASSESSMENT RATES .....................................................................................................14 RIGHT-OF-W A Y/EASEMENTS/PERMITS ....................................................................15 PROJECT SCHEDULE......................................................................................................16 FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION.................................................................... 16 APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATE TABLES APPENDIX B - FIGURES APPENDIX C - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX D - GEOTECHNICAL EY ALUATlON REPORT APPENDIX E - QUESTlONNAIRE/MEETING MINUTES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 05-10 HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 1. INTRODUCTION This report examines the proposed street and utility improvements including watermain, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, street reconstruction, and the associated boulevard restoration along the following streets: · 18th Avenue South, from Mainstreet to the cui de sac o 19th Avenue South, from Mainstreet to the cui de sac . 20th Avenue South, north of Excelsior Boulevard . 1 st Street South, from 17th Avenue South to 19th Avenue South Specifically the project involves: 1. Replacement and improvement of storm sewer pipe and inlets and additions of new inlets and structures 2. Spot replacement and improvement of sanitary sewer pipe 3. Concrete curb and gutter construction 4. Bituminous street removal and reconstruction 5. Turfrestoration in all areas of construction 2. BACKGROUND This report was ordered by the City Council on September 20, 2005. Council Resolution No. 2005-91 was passed requesting that a study be completed analyzing the potential improvements of the streets noted above. The improvements being considered include reconstruction of the bituminous street, construction of concrete curb, and utility improvements. The project location is shown in Figure 1. A neighborhood meeting was held for the pmposes of informing the affected property owners about the improvements being considered and receiving their comments about problems and concerns to be addressed. Also, a questionnaire was distributed, giving the adjacent property owners the opportunity to provide their input on various project related concerns including water and sewer services and drainage. A copy of the questionnaire and meeting minutes are included in the Appendix. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T16.21523 Page 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project areas include single family, multi-family, and commercial properties. The neighborhoods are fully developed and well established with mature trees along many ofthe boulevards. 1.1. Streets The bituminous streets within the project area are aged and exhibit wear and distress to different degrees due to traffic loadings. This is evident on the surface by transverse and longitudinal cracking, alligator and block cracking, the exposure of pavement aggregates, and scaling. There is also evidence of pavement edge deterioration due to lack of curb and gutter along the corridors. Without curb and gutter, storm water runs along the pavement/grass edge, weakening it through erosion and freeze-thaw cycles. There is evidence of previous maintenance including overlays, seal coating, and patching. Subgrade soil strength testing and core sampling was completed by Braun Intertec in November 2005 within all of the project areas. A summary of the existing street conditions is listed in Table I. A copy of the geotechnical evaluation report is included in the Appendix. Hopkins' pavement management system utilizes a pavement condition index (pCI) rating of o to 100. This rating is based on surficial pavement observations. The indices correspond to the condition of the pavement as follows: 0-10 = failed pavement; 10-25 = very poor; 25-40 = poor; 40-55 = fair; 55-70 = good; 70-85 = very good; and 85-100 = excellent. This rating system assists in prioritizing roadway improvements and projecting costs for use in the City's pavement management and capital improvements plan. Actual levels of improvements are determined by completing a comprehensive geotechnical evaluation (included in this report) and a preliminary engineering report. The existing PCI values are listed in Table 1. The majority of the existing subgrade soils were found to be fine- to medium-grained silty sand with small amounts of gravel. This type of subgrade material has an approximate Hveem R-value of 30. Hveem R-values give a quantitative value to subgrade strength and assist in pavement section design. A value of 30 is indication of soils suitable for pavement support without significant sub grade corrections. 18'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac The street is flat to minor rolling in nature with longitudinal grades of I % to 2%. The northernmost segment of the street off of Mainstreet (approximately 130 LF) is delineated with concrete curb and gutter (B618). The southernmost segment of the street (the cui de sac) is delineated with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. The remainder of the corridor has no existing curb. There are no existing sidewalks along the street. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The existing street layout is shown in Figures 3and 4. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. Tl6.21523 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 19'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac The street is flat in nature with longitudinal grades averaging less than I %. The northernmost segment ofthe street off of Mainstreet (approximately 170 LF) is delineated with concrete curb and gutter (B618). The southernmost segment of the street (the cui de sac) is delineated with surmountable concrete curb and gutter. The remainder of the corridor has no existing curb. There are no existing sidewalks along the street. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The existing street layout is shown in Figures 5 and 6. 2dh Avenue South: north of Excelsior Boulevard The street is flat to minor sloping in nature with longitudinal grades of 0.5% to 2.5%. At the south end of the block, there is about 120' of concrete curb and gutter (B618) along the west side and about 15' of bituminous curb along the east side. There is no curb along the remainder of the corridor. There are no existing sidewalks along the street. Parking is allowed on both sides ofthe street. The existing street layout is shown in Figure 7. )" Street South: 17'h Avenue South to 19'h Avenue South The street is flat to minor sloping in nature with longitudinal grades of I % to 3%. There is no curb and gutter along this corridor. There are no existing sidewalks along the street. Parking is allowed on both sides of the street. The existing street layout is shown in Figure 8. Summa Fill, silty sand, fine- to medium-grained, little avel, dark brown, moist Fill, silty sand, fine- to medium-grained, with a trace of gravel, dark brown, moist Fill, silty sand, fme- to medium-grained, dark brown, moist Fill, silty sand, fine- to medium-grained, with a trace of gravel, dark brown to brown, to moist Note: There is no apparent aggregate base below the existing bituminous pavement. 18th Avenue South 27.0'-36.5' 2.5"-3.5" 34-52 19th Avenue South 25.0'-46.0' 5" 9-20 20th A venue South 30.5'-34.5' 4.5" 21 1" Street South 26.5'-29.5' 3"_6" 17-32 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T16.21523 Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.2 Watermain Research of the available as-built information and a meeting with the water/sewer department staff helped define the existing alignment and conditions of the watermain as well as gain an understanding of what improvements are necessary within the project areas. All of the watermain in the project area is 6" cast iron pipe. Service lines within these areas are typically 3/4" or 1" and their materials may be copper or steel. Overall, each service line exposed as a part of this improvement project should be inspected and considered for replacement based on its material type, age, and condition. Further discussion of water service replacements is included in section 4. The existing watermain systems are illustrated in Figures 3-8. 18'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac The watermain presently serving 18th Avenue South consists of 6" cast iron pipe which runs along the west side of the street. The 6" line is looped to the 16" watermain along Excelsior Boulevard and the 12" watermain along Mainstreet. Currently two hydrants extend from the watermain along this segment: one at Excelsior Boulevard and one at 1 st Street South. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the existing watermain. 19'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac The watermain presently serving 19th Avenue South consists of 6" cast iron pipe which runs along the west side of the street. The 6" line is looped to the 16" watermain along Excelsior Boulevard and the 12" watermain along Mainstreet. Currently two hydrants extend from the watermain along this segment: one at Excelsior Boulevard and one at 151 Street South. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the existing watermain. 2dh Avenue South: north of Excelsior Boulevard The existing watermain along 20th Avenue South consists of 6" cast iron pipe which runs along the west side of the street and is fed from the 16" line along Excelsior Boulevard. The watermain dead-ends at a hydrant at the north end of this block. Figure 7 illustrates the existing watermain. r' Street South: 17'h Avenue South to 19'h Avenue South There is no existing watermain running along 1 st Street South. 3.3 Sanitary Sewer The existing condition of the sanitary sewer system was determined from as-built information, sewer videotapes, the City's Sanitary Sewer Utility Master Plan, as well as discussions with staff from the water/sewer department. Sewer pipes within the project area consist of8" vitrified clay pipes. Recent television logs ofthe system indicate the majority of the sewer lines within the project are in adequate condition. Staff from the sewer department has indicated that there have been very few service calls for this area over the last ten years. The service lines within the area 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. TI6.2I523 Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I are 4"- 6" vitrified clay, ductile iron or concrete pipe. The existing sanitary sewer systems are illustrated in Figures 3-8. 18h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac The sanitary sewer presently serving 18th Avenue South consists of 8" vitrified clay pipe, which flows south. The sanitary sewer video logs revealed the presence of roots in several of the joints. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the existing sanitary sewer system. 19'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac The sanitary sewer presently serving 19th Avenue South consists of 8" vitrified clay pipe, which flows south. Televised recordings of the existing pipe revealed the presence of roots in several of the joints. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the existing sanitary sewer system. 2dh Avenue South: north of Excelsior Boulevard The sanitary sewer presently serving 20th Avenue South consists of 8" vitrified clay pipe, which flows south. The sanitary sewer video logs revealed the presence of roots in the joints. The sewer log also indicates a broken pipe at two locations. Grease build-up was also noted in the televising report. Figure 7 illustrates the existing sanitary sewer system. 1st Street South: 17th Avenue South to 19'h Avenue South There is no sanitary sewer along this segment of I st Street South. 3.4 Storm Sewer' The existing condition of the storm sewer system was determined from as-built information and discussions with City staff. The assessment of the existing storm sewerrevealed few problems. However, modifications and extensions of the existing system are recommended later in this report to compliment proposed street improvements. The existing storm sewer systems are illustrated in Figures 3-8. 18h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac Storm sewer along 18th Avenue South consists of two catch basins mid-block between the cui de sac and 1 st Street South. Runoff collected from these catch basins flows north through a 12" concrete pipe along the west side of 18th Avenue South to the system of catch basins at the intersection of 1st Street South and 18th Avenue South. Also, two catch basins are located at the south end of the cui de sac. Runoff collected from these catch basins flows south through a 12" concrete pipe to the storm sewer system along Excelsior Boulevard. Figure 3 and 4 illustrate the existing storm sewer system. 19th Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac Storm sewer on 19th Avenue South consists of two catch basins located at the south end of the cuI de sac. The runoff collected from these catch basins flows south through a IS" concrete pipe to Excelsior Boulevard. Also, there are two catch basins located at the 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. Tl6.21523 Page 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I intersection of 19th Avenue South and 1 st Street South; these structures are discussed under the 151 Street South storm sewer. Figure 5 and 6 illustrate the existing storm sewer system. 2dh Avenue South: north of Excelsior Boulevard Currently there are two catch basins at the south end of 20th Avenue South. The runoff collected in the structure on the west side flows through a 12" pipe into the structure on the east side of 20th Avenue South and then flows southeast into a catch basin on Excelsior Blvd. Figure 7 illustrates the existing storm sewer system. ]'t Street South: 17'h Avenue South to 19th Avenue South Storm sewer along 151 Street South includes two catch basins located at the intersection of 19th Avenue South. The two catch basins are located on the north side ofthe road; runoff is collected in the west structure and flows through a 12" concrete pipe to the east. From the east structure runoff continues to flow east to 18th Avenue South through a 12" concrete pipe along the north boulevard of the street. The 18th Avenue South intersection includes four catch basins. Runoff collected at this intersection continues to flow east through the 12" concrete pipe along the north boulevard and discharges into a catch basin at 17th Avenue South. Figure 8 illustrates the existing storm sewer system. 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Bituminous Streets 18th Avenue South, 19th Avenue South, 20th Avenue South and l5t Street South are scheduled for improvements in accordance with the City of Hopkins proposed Capital Improvement Plan. Table 2 describes the proposed street improvements. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed street section for all streets within the project limits. In general, the results of the soils and pavement testing indicate that the street sections within the project area are underlain with fill containing silty sand, fine- to medium-grained and little gravel. The conditions of the streets have reached a point where maintenance procedures such as seal coating or milling and overlaying are no longer cost effective. Therefore, reconstruction of the streets is recommended. The recommended pavement section is 11.5 inches thick and includes 3.5" of bituminous pavement and 8" of aggregate base. Local soft, unstable and/or areas containing organic material within the sub grade will be excavated and replaced with stable material as they are encountered during construction. Concrete curb and gutter is strongly recommended to be constructed along all streets within the project area. The curb and gutter will improve overland drainage along the corridors and will help support the bituminous pavement edges along the streets. These benefits can ultimately reduce the need for future maintenance and extend the overall life ofthe streets. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI ProjectNo. T16.21523 Page 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reconstruction along 18th and 19th Avenues South is proposed to tenninate adjacent to the newer street sections at the cui de sacs and just south of Mainstreet. The new horizontal alignments will approximate the existing alignments and the street widths will be setto a consistent 28' (face of curb to face of curb), which is the current average street width. In general, the new streets are expected to be about six inches lower then the existing streets. This will facilitate the construction of the curb and gutter and will maintain drainage along the boulevards. Figures 9-14 illustrate the proposed street improvements. Table 2 Prooosed Street Imorovements ~,' ',,'~i~;~~tr~i~'~;~ii~:l~:~;~~~~~,:: t~::::~~tr .'~,~:~,:Z:~:~~{:,:~:~;~ :1~;:';~;~?~~:::~~Ar;;) ;~;;;~~t~~~s~~~:':~ 18th Avenue South Reconstruction 3.5" 8" 28' 19th Avenue South . Reconstruction 3.5" 8" 28' 20th Avenue South 3.5" 8" 28' Reconstruction 1" Street South Reconstruction 3.5" 8" 28' 4.2 Watermain The main water lines currently serving the project areas have been deemed adequate. Due to the relative age of the existing water service lines, it is recommended that any service lines exposed as a part of these street and utility improvements be individually evaluated and considered for replacement. Any exposed lead service pipes would be required to be replaced by the Minnesota Department of Health. The City may also want to consider a cost-sharing approach to water service replacements within this project area. Because overlying proposed road improvements are expected to last a minimum of twenty years, it is possible that unimproved water services could break within that time period, resulting in more expensive replacement and restoration costs for the homeowner and a patch area within the City street. In an effort to ensure the longevity of the street improvements, the City staff has proposed to use the service program that was used in the "Presidential" area in 2005. The program offered to pay 1/3 of the cost of installing a new service from the main to and including the curb stop as a part of the improvement project. The remaining 2/3 of the cost would be paid by the homeowner. This is included in this report for consideration by the City Council as it is not a City policy. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No.T16.21523 Page 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 18'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac No watermain improvements are being recommended along 18th Avenue South. 19'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac No watermain improvements are being recommended along 18th Avenue South. 2dh Avenue South: north of Excelsior Boulevard No watermain improvements are being recommended along 18th Avenue South. r' Street South: 17th Avenue South to 19'h Avenue South No watermain improvements are being recommended along this segment of 1 st Street South. 4.3 Sanitary Sewer The information used to evaluate the sanitary sewer's existing conditions included televised recordings of the sewers, as built information, manhole reports, and discussions with the City staff. The majority of the sanitary sewer in the project area is deemed adequate. The televised recordings for the sewers showed several locations where roots have entered pipe joints. It is recommended that the City clean the lines of all roots, mineral deposits and grease. This work is not being considered as a part of this project, as it is routine maintenance. Due to the relative age of the existing service lines, it is recommended that any service lines exposed as a part of these street and utility improvements be individually evaluated and considered for replacement. Any repair or replacement of existing sanitary service lines would be 100% assessable to the corresponding property owner. Some of the existing sanitary sewer manhole castings may have a smaller diameter. If any of these are encountered during construction they will be replaced with larger castings to improve safety and accessibility for maintenance workers when entering the structures. 18'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac No sanitary sewer improvements are being recommended along these segments of 18th Avenue South. 19'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cui de sac No sanitary sewer improvements are being recommended along these segments of 19th Avenue South. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMIProjectNo. T16.21523 Page 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2dh Avenue South: north orExcelsior Boulevard Recommended sanitary sewer improvements along 20th Avenue South include spot repair at two locations, approximately 5 feet in length each, with PVC sanitary pipe. Figure 13 illustrates the proposed sanitary sewer spot repairs. ]" Street South: I1h Avenue South to 19'h Avenue South No sanitary sewer runs along 1 sl Street South. 4.4 Storm Sewer In general, the existing storm sewer system throughout the project is satisfactory. However, there are some minor improvements, which are summarized below. In addition to the following improvements, it is recommended that drain tile be stubbed out of every catch basin, in both directions, and extended along the curb line for 100 to 150 feet. This will facilitate subsurface drainage along the street corridors. The proposed storm sewer is illustrated in figures 9-14. 1 tf' Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cuI de sac Recommended storm sewer improvements include the addition of two catch basins mid block between Mainstreet and 1 st Street South to improve surface drainage. Also recommended is the replacement of the existing two catching basins located mid block between 1 st Street South and the cuI de sac to better match into the new curb and gutter. Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the proposed storm sewer system. 19'h Avenue South: Mainstreet to the cuI de sac Recommended storm sewer improvements include the addition of two catch basins mid block between Mainstreet and 1 st Street South and two catch basins between 1 st Street South and the cui de sac to better improve drainage. Figures 11 and 12 illustrate the proposed storm sewer system. 2dh Avenue South: north or Excelsior Boulevard Recommended storm sewer improvements include the addition of two catch basins mid block to improve surface drainage. Figure 13 illustrates the proposed storm sewer system. 1" Street South: I1h Avenue South to 19'h Avenue South Recommended storm sewer improvements include the replacement of all storm catch basins and lead pipes at the 18th and 19th Avenue South intersections to match into the new curb and gutter at these intersections. In addition to replacing the existing storm sewer structures two catch basins and three storm manholes will be added at the intersection of 18th Avenue South to match into the existing storm sewer pipes. Also, one storm manhole will be added at the intersection of 19th Avenue South to match in with the existing storm sewer pipe. Figure 14 illustrates the proposed storm sewer system. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMIProjectNo. Tl6.21523 Page 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.5 Sidewalks Any existing private walks within project limits will be replaced in-kind as necessary to match existing walks to the new street grades. No new sidewalks are proposed. 4.6 Drivewav Aprons Any existing driveway aprons within project limits will be replaced with new concrete aprons to match the existing driveways to the new street grades. 4.7 Lawn Sprinkler Svstems There may be existing lawn sprinkler systems along the roadways scheduled for reconstruction. The adjacent property owners will need to assist in locating and identifying the types of sprinkler systems that are in place. The contractor will be required to make every effort to preserve the inplace systems during construction. 4.8 Street Signing and Striping The existing street signing, including stop signs and street name signs, will be removed and reinstalled by the contractor as necessary to facilitate the project construction. No striping is proposed as a part of the project improvements. 4.9 Turf Restoration The existing trees will be protected from the construction as much as possible. In the event tree removal is necessary due to street grade changes or othelWise, the City will consider adding trees to the neighborhood during the fall tree replacement program. The areas disturbed by the construction will be re-graded to match the new street grades and restored with boulevard type sod. Boulevards will be re-graded as necessary to facilitate drainage. 4. 10 Lililiting No additional lighting is proposed for this project. 5. OUESTlONNAIRES Residents within the project area received questionnaires, a sample of which is included in Appendix D. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. Tl6.21523 Page 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6. ESTIMATED COSTS Estimated construction costs presented below include a 10 percent contingency factor. Overhead costs, estimated at 25 percent, include legal, engineering, administrative and fiscal costs. Final costs and assessments will be determined by using low-bid construction costs of the proposed work. Proposed construction costs for the 2006 Street and Utility Improvements (including bituminous street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, and turf restoration) are itemized in the tables located in Appendix A and are summarized below. These cost estimates are based upon public construction cost information. Since the consultant has no control over the cost oflabor, materials, competitive bidding process, weather conditions and other factors affecting the cost of construction, all cost estimates are opinions for general information of the client and no warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy of construction cost estimates is made. It is recommended that costs for project financing should be based upon actual, competitive bid prices with reasonable contingencies. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T16.2l523 Page 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS I" Street South _17'. Avenue South to 18'. Avenue South Subtotal $ 51,840.00 Contingencies (10%) $ 5,184.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ ]4,256.00 Total Project Costs $ 71,280.00 1" Street South _18'. Avenue South to 19'. Avenue South Subtotal $ 55,890.00 Contingencies (] 0%) $ 5,589.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ 15,370.00 Total Proj ect Costs $ 76,849.00 18'. Avenue South _1" Street South to the cuI de sac Subtotal $ 72,040.00 Contingencies (]O%) $ 7,204.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ 19,811.00 Total Project Costs $ 99,055.00 18'. Avenue South - I" Street South to Mainstreet Subtotal $ 68,813.00 Contingencies (10%) $ 6,881.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ ] 8,924.00 Total Project Costs $ 94,618.00 19th A venue South - I" Street South to the cuI de sac Subtotal $ 86,178.00 Contingencies (] 0%) $ 8,618.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ 23,699.00 Tota] Project Costs $ 118,495.00 19th A venue South - 1" Street South to Mainstreet Subtotal $ 63,163.00 Contingencies (10%) $ 6,316.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ ]7,370.00 Tota] Project Costs $ 86,849.00 20th Avenue South Subtotal $ ]06,943.00 Contingencies (10%) $ 10,694.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ 29,409.00 Tota] Project Costs $ 147,046.00 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMIProjectNo. T15.20896 Page 12 I I ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Storm Sewer $ ]02,960.00 I Subtotal $ 10,296.00 Contingencies (10%) $ 28,3 ]4.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ 141,570.00 I Tota] Project Costs Sanitary Sewer I Subtotal $ ],500.00 Contingencies (10%) $ 150.00 Engineering and Administration (25%) $ 413.00 I Tota] Project Costs $ 2,063.00 SUBTOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 609,327.00 CONTINGENCIES (10%) $ 60,932.00 I ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION (25%) $ 167,566.00 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 837,825.00 I I I I I I I I I I I 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T15.20896 Page 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7. ASSESSMENT RATES The proposed street improvements are eligible for assessments according to the City of Hopkins assessment policy. The following table provides the estimated assessment rates for the properties included in the assessment roll. Figure 16 illustrates those properties included in the assessment roll. Per City policy, street improvements along 18th, 19th and 20'h Avenues South will be assessed to the adjacent properties along these avenues. Street improvements along 1" Street South will be assessed to those properties along 17th, 18'h and 19'h Avenues between Excelsior Boulevard and the alley, as shown in Figure 16. According to the City's Assessment Policy, 70% of the project's street costs are assessed to the benefiting properties. However, an assessment cap exists in the policy based on assessment rates established on past similar projects. An assessment cap of$60.23 per foot has been established and will be applied to this construction project. The assessment cap is not applicable to the commercial properties along Mainstreet. Storm sewer, watermain and sanitary sewer improvements are paid for 100% by their respective utility funds. Total assessments are $351,417.03. PROPERTIES ASSESSABLE 70% BENEFITTING COST PER COST PER COSTS ASSESSMENT FOOTAGE! FOOT/ FOOT/ UNIT #UNlTS UNIT W/CAP ADJUSTMENT 1" Street South, 17th Avenue South to $71,280.00 $49,896.00 1917.56 ft $26.02/ft N/A 18th Avenue South 18m A venue South between 1 st Street $15,053.35 7 units $2,] 50.48/ N/A South and the cuI de unit sac (Eastside) ]8m Avenue South between 1 st Street South and Mainstreet (Eastside) and 17th $34,841.56 1339.03 ft $26.02/ft N/A Avenue South, Mainstreet to Exce]sior Boulevard (W estside) 1" Street South, 18th Avenue South to $76,849.00 $53,794.30 1927.48 ft $27.91/ft N/A 19th Avenue South 18th Avenue South between 1" Street $]5,880.79 7 units $2,268.68/ N/A South and the cuI de unit sac (W estside) 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T15.20896 Page 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROPERTIES ASSESSABLE 70% BENEFITTING COST PER COST PER COSTS ASSESSMENT FOOTAGE/ FOOT/ FOOT/UNIT #UNlTS UNIT W/CAP ADJUSTMENT 19m A venue South between 1" Street $16,424.48 7 units $2,346.35/ N/A South and the cuI de unit sac (Eastside) 18th Avenue South between 1" Street South and Mainstreet (Westside) and 19th $21,490.70 770 ft $27.91/ft N/A A venue South, 1" Street South to Mainstreet (Eastside) 18th Avenue South, $4,952.75/ 1" Street South to the $99,055.00 $69,338.50 ]4 units unit $4,818.40/unit cuI de sac 18th Avenue South, $60.23/ft 1" Street South to $94,618.00 $66,232.60 863 ft $76.75/ft Mainstreet 19th A venue South, $5,529.77/ 1 st Street South to the $118,495.00 $82,946.50 15 units $4,818.40/unit cuI de sac unit 19th A venue South, 1 st Street South to $86,849.00 $60,794.30 830.39 ft $73.21/ft $60.23/ft Mainstreet 20th A venue South, north of Excelsior $]47,046.00 $102,932.20 1337 ft $76.99/ft $60.23/ft Bou]evard A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix C of this report. 8. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS/PERMITS The proposed improvements will be limited to the existing street rights-of-way along 18th Avenue South, 19th Avenue South, 20th Avenue South and 1st Street South, from 17th Avenue S. to 19th Avenue S. Temporary construction easements may be needed for work outside the street right-of-way such as driveway apron replacement, grading and turf restoration. Permits will be required from the Minnesota Department of Health for watermain construction, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for grading 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T15.20896 Page 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I and storm sewer construction, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for sanitary sewer construction and grading (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit). 9. PROJECT SCHEDULE If this Preliminary Engineering Report is accepted by the City Council, the following schedule is proposed: Present Preliminary Engineering Report & Order Public Improvement Hearing.......... .... ............ ............ ............... ... ..January 3, 2006 Conduct Public Improvement Hearing and Order Plans & Specifications. .... .. . ... .. ... . .February 7,2006 Approve Plans & Specifications and Advertise for Bids....... ....... ..................... ...March 21, 2006 Accept Bids/Order Assessment Hearing.. ...... ........... .... ........ ...... ............... ..... May 2,2006 Conduct Public Assessment Hearing/Adopt Assessment Roll................................ ..June 6, 2006 Award Bid.. ...... .............................. ..................... ......... ..................... .... June 6, 2006 Construction......................................................................... mid-June - September, 2006 10. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION From an engineering standpoint, this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary and can best be accomplished by letting competitive bids for the work. It is recommended that the work be done under one contract in order to complete the work in an orderly and efficient manner. The City, its financial consultant, and the persons assessed will have to detennine the economic feasibility of the proposed improvements. 2005 Street and Utility Improvements, City of Hopkins BMI Project No. T15.20896 Page 16 ~ , , , , , ., , , , , , Ayy\1NDIX- A COsrr \1Srrll'\A rr\1 1: ABLES - - I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2000 STREET AND UTlUTY IMPROVEMENTS ,"""'" CITY OF HOPKINS. MN I BMI PROJECT NO. T18.2173. CITY PROJECT NO. 05-10 SCHEDUl.S .A~ 1st STREET SOUTH . 17th AVENUE SOUTH TO 18th AVENUE SOUTH I STREET IMPROVEMENTS 'ASSESSABlE' SUBTOTAL $51 840.00 10% CONTINGENCIes 164.00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $14256.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDUl.S ~A. $71,280.00 I SCHEDUl.S "S~ 1sl STREET SOUTH - 18th AVENUE SOUTH TO 19th AVENUE SOUTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS IASSESSABLE' SUBTOTAL $55 690.00 I 10% CONTINGENCIES $5 589.00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $15370.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEOUl.S "S. $76,849.00 SCHEOUl.S ~C" 18th AVENUE SOUTH .1st STREET SOUTH TO THE CUL DE SAC I STREET IMPROVEMENTS 'ASSESSABLE' SUBTOTAL $72 040 00 10% CONTINGENCies $7 204 00 25% ENGINEERING ANDADMrNI$TRATION $19811.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE ~C" $99,055.00 I SCHEDULE .0- 18th AVENUE SOUTH .1at STREET ~H TO MAlNSTREET STREET IMPROVEMENTS fASSES$AB SUBTOTAL $68 813.00 I 10% CONTINGENCIES $6 881.00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $18924.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE V $94,618.00 SCHEDULE ~E" 19th AVENUE SOUTH .'~"~TREET ~ TO THE CUL DE SAC I STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSAB SUBTOTAL $86 17800 10% CONTINGENCIES $8 818.00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION 23899.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE we- $118495.00 I SCHEDULE "F" 19th AVENUE SOUTH .1~,~TREET ~ TO MAlNSTREET STREET IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSABLE SUBTOTAL $63 163.00 I 10% CONTINGENCIES $6 318.00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION 1737000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE wpo $86,849.00 SCHEDULE ~G~ 20th AVENUE SOUTH. NORTH OF EXCSLSIOR BOULEVARD I STREET IMPROVEMENTS .ASSESSABLEI SUBTOTAL $106 943 00 10% CONTINGENCIES $10894 00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION 29 409.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE ~G. $147,048.00 I SCHEDULE ~W STORM SewER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL 102960.00 10% CONTINGENCIES $1029600 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $2831400 I TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE .... $141,570.00 SCHEDULE "I. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SUBTOTAL 1 500.00 I 10% CONTINGENCIES $150.00 25% ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION $41300 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST SCHEDULE ~l. $2,063.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST 837,825.00 I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 12/2912005 SCHEDULE ~A" 1st STREET SOUTH . 17th AVENUE S. TO 18th AVENUE S. STREET IMPROVEMENTS :{~~~' :~~li\~~~t~l~~~~~~1}{{~~~~,:",~~.;~?t;~~;\}~l1'tf$.i~~ fR'itfi~It.i; T~11~~~ ~.~~.~ ~~~.t~~~;:~,B~~~1{~~~\@1 I~~()~;~ ~tr.EM ~;i~~~if~'~'~~~}~it1*:/~1i~~~ :';'>~, \~:~'fi;:::,'A~~H$:~U 8tf~W B.tD'~~)(!:Y. ~ U~_n:~' ;{rip~~~:~:~ t~;.\rS~;~.:r.8r~~~~.~~~f?~ 'W*~i ~~~~~'1~:~~~h~?!t~;;~t~(?1:t;~~~tr:~1!:,':;'}::\:H~~f;~:i1"~;f,;~;~~~'~:i1~NJ~*~ "~~J~ ~~~{~;~t, ';~~';i,~~'~;,.~~_:~~~-A~SI~:0n;1; , MOBILIZATION I LS SJOOOOO 3000.00 2 ROOT CUTTING 3 TREE $20000 $60000 3 REMOve BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 900 so YO $200 1 800 00 . REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DRIVEWAYS 75 SOVO ..SO $337.50 5 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMEI'IT DRIVEWAYS AND WAlK " SOVO $7.50 15.00 , SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FUlL DEPTH 100 UN FT 5300 S3OO00 7 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH " lINFT ..SO $45.00 , SUBGRAOE EXCAVATION ev as CUVO $15.00 $1275.00 , COMMON EXCAVATION CV 'SO CUYO $16.00 $7200.00 " TOPSOIL BORROW CV '" CUYO $2000 $2 200.00 " SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CV as CUYO $1600 $1530.00 12 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 STREETS CV 245 cuvO $26.00 $6370,00 13 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE.3' DRIVeWAYS V4 INCL. AGG BASE 35 SOYD $23.00 $805.00 .. BITUMINOUS WEAR COURse.STREETS V4 75 TON $40,00 $3 000,00 15 BITUMINOUS NQI'4-WEAR COURSE-STREETS LV) '05 70N $38-00 $3 990.00 ,. BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT '00 GAL 52.SO $25000 " CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE 560 UNFT $950 $5320,00 " 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRiVeWAY APRONS INet AGG BASE so savo $3600 $1900.00 " ... PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN 700 LF $10.00 $7000.00 '" TRAFFIC CONTROl , LS $1425.00 $1425.00 " SILT FENCE TYPE PREAS$EMBlED 75 lINFT $2 so 187.50 22 INLET PROTECTION - Fit. TER AGGREGATE 6 EACH S2OO00 51200_00 23 LAWN TYPE $00 580 savo 53 so 51030.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 12f291200S SCHEDULE "B" 1st STREET SOUTH .18th AVENUE S. TO 19th AVENUE S. STREET IMPROVEMENTS ~'~'.-~~':'.~~. :?:k'~'1~\~.'-;FP~.~~~;':~1J.i'SJi..QII]1.. -- -'W ~*~;~.~\!;r~"':\-;.,..,,;;r,..~{~.'.t:::./~\;!.f.t-..I--.-f._' 'i,$;'~L.I...,.1t~;;:""..:\"tf... (.(tt.,r.,,;,.;:.;r.'. ':.~.:K~t~~.' ,.,r-E~_,I i}~~' 't~_~~~-:;4:f.~:;':~~fR~~~~~~ ]..!t?!'f~:~:Z ;!m~~~~+.{~~ "+";-"~~::~: -- 1J~~~~IMAT,ED.~1..4~~::"i'~"'~:' UNrrr}!,;!~ '{NO,t} 1-r:rEM:"II'.:'~~~fW~j~~$: '~:.:~r::~~9:,f'~!~~~::~\~.5;" ';i[J} W..\I.~B'D~:-:.\:t: ~UNrr:"; :;~\PRJCE';J. ''J!.-;:il~_t:'h ;,!:,~::r{r.' :~~:;: ,~~,!'.'.~~~~,~>>~':h*)~~~,;.(~'~~~}J;.kft2~"\;#J~":~; _ "",;;;; .;,J:QUANTify'.~'i'i 'J: ,~,-~:~~:' ::~_:i3;..,.~i.: , .rrt,'...':"f. >A;..'.'_', ..,-,;:'....~"'I~"'~ ~.>J,.<\lN"yf!...'. ".^' '.' .... '. ""." '. ...,~.f~.1: ~'.'" ',. '.' ~ ''''....''''-....~,.... -.". . ;". ,-'''f-:.' ':\..,'.,.....f....~, 'Yu;",L" '.'" h.!. ..}-~,:,.-..:. r'.';.-;-'>~- ;;t~(o~~t:....." /.<', ~,,:,.,i!..~,..'~l'";.., ,::'.I':'~ - ".,;,,;;~..."'" ..<.!," ""',: ~ ';' . "'-",,,>,,.:;:;,\! ~;.\."i?~::'Tj';/'l~t:~!:~~_~\t~}:>~"1 "<~lh;..,.I'J""""';:;.f:tj'1."O . "'-""~"."f'-""_"'''' or,,.,.. , .,., .....,. ."., ".., ..' ~!t-'...lr-~'J~~OTAL<l~:' ':'it. {~>;,.1~~B'):l~:tJ;~~~f'~ >).):'17:.'f:..-;~..;~';.."j:,~~',,~.:{~-~,.~;: , MOBILIZATION I LS 00000 2 ROOTCUTTlNG 3 TREE $200_00 3 REMOVE BlTUMltKlUS PAVEMENT '030 so YO $2_00 , REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ORIVEWAYS '00 SOVO SO , REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT ORIVEWAVS ANO WALK 30 so YO $7.50 . SAWING B1TUMltKlUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH " L1NFT $3.00 , SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FUll DEPTH 30 LINFT .SO . SUBGRAOEEXCAVAnON EY '00 CUVO $15.00 . COMMON EXCAVATION cv EY '" CUVO $16,00 " TOPSOIL BORROW CY '30 CUVO $20,00 " SELECT GRANULAR BORROW cv '00 CUvo $1800 12 AGGREGATE BASE ClASS 5 STREETS cv 2.' CUVD 26_00 13 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE-3' DRIVEWAYS V< INCl_ AGG BASE SO SOYD $23.00 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE.STREETS Y' 60 >ON 000 " BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR couRSE.STREETS lV3 '" TON $3800 ,. BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT " GAL $2_SO " CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE .., llNFT $9_50 ,. 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT ORI~WAY APRONS INCl AGG BASE 60 so YO 3800 " 4. PERFORATEOPlPE DRAIN soo LF 10_00 20 TRAFFIC CONTROl , L' $1425.00 " SILT FENCE TYPE PREASSEMBlED SO llNFT $2 SO 22 IN..ET PROTECTION - FILTER AGGREGATE , EACH $200.00 23 LAWN TYPE SOD 690 so YO $3.SO 00000 .00 $2 060_00 SO 00 $22500 $225,00 $135.00 $1500.00 S8640,00 $2600,00 $1800.00 $7410.00 1150.00 3200_00 S4180.00 115_00 $5795_00 3040_00 $5000_00 1425.00 $125_00 00 $2415.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS. MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 1212912005 SCHEDULE ~C~ 18th AVENUE SOUTH -1st STREET S. TO THE CUL DE SAC STREET IMPROVEMENTS i~~~l ~ft~~;;"~ "',;~:;,~~;~;~it~(:~F2~~!1~s~~t1rc' '"i-, S~?~.y./.;.;j '. "ESTIMATED~'. ....f1:.:tBID~~.~!t ciu~~h:-"_\ ':.,'i, ~~ '-,-,' UNIT UNIT ,- PRICE, .'.~):.:>.,; ::J;~~*J~~~i~l~ 1 MOBILIZATION 2 ROOT CUTTING 3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 4 REMove BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DRIVEWAYS 5 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH 6 5UBGRADEEXCAVATION 1 COMMON EXCAVATION 8 TOPSOIL BORROW 9 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW 10 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 STREETS 11 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE.)" DRIVEWAYS V4 INCL AGG BASE 12 BITUMINOUS WEARCOURse-5TREETS LV4 13 BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE-STREETS LV) 14 BITUMINOUS MATERiAl FOR TACK COAT 15 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE 16 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING 17 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX 18 CONCRETE CURB 8. GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE 19 f)" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY APRONS INCL. AGG BASE 20 SALVAGE SPRINKLER HEAD 21 INSTAlL SPRINKLER HEAD 22 4' PERFORA TEO PIPE DRAIN 23 TRAFFIC CONTROL 24 SILT FENCE TYPE PREASSEMBLEO 25 INlET PROTECTION" FILTER AGGREGATE 26 LAWN TYPE SOD , LS $3000.00 $3000.00 3 TREE $200.00 $600.00 1410 SOYD $200 $2820.00 17' SaYD "50 $787,50 '" LlNFT $300 $55500 '" CUYO $1500 $202500 no CUYD $1600 $11 360,00 17' euyo S2O.00 $3 400.00 '" eUYQ $18.00 $2430.00 '" GUYO S26.00 $10660.00 " sa YO $23.00 $1955.00 >2" TON $40.00 $4 600,00 '"' TON $3600 $6080.00 " GAL $2.50 $162.50 1 EAOi $600.00 $600.00 , EACH S3OO00 S3OO00 1 EACH $20000 S2OO00 9<0 lINFT $9.50 $893000 90 saYQ $38.00 $3420.00 2 EACH S6500 $13000 2 EACH $175.00 $350.00 250 LF $10.00 $2 500.00 , LS $1430.00 $1430.00 " lINFT $250 S181.50 2 EACH $20000 $400.00 '" so YO $350 957.50 fN 01 EV 01 CV 01 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 12129/2005 SCHEDULE "0" 18th AVENUE -1st STREET SOUTH TO MAlNSTREET STREET IMPROVEMENTS '.,.:':)~~>~rr.: il:A-",~~'i(;^,\'.1-;.:.o'Xt,.'\,~1:';.-'7&3,~~, ':.:;~r-:'t~ ,~'d( m"'l<-t.~ ~ - ~" ,...rr. EM....: ~",.!{~1:!~I,.~t~f~!!ljt~:'t"ii '<'1~' :1.:ii.;Lll~~l~,~-t}. 4",~(( """ >11,.;:.1, ~ fit'". 1~'~it:"~''v::.:t<li.4'r!. '~.l~t ~;.:k{~ '.~ ,~~,,{jri~''''-: ~,p" '~'i J.'~r' , NO \ fTEM.If,?:,~..t;:~~1<"'<.../;~l';)",'~~';r;;~~fl.)) f!b:t',~, .'l, tv' 'r'tL'-":~ .,.',.,.,.,.,.,':.,:....:..,.,,' ~...L..".'~.',:.'~ ~;.~ 1 ~/.!d~:":.1o~ ...~:~ _'} ~~ ,.>o;..tL "" J ,>,In', ...:. ;t t~ 'j. . !",' ';-<' .\ 'f- (. , _, A:" :);,,', f. ,~,:,~"~rl-:"~">;~'r:...<->l;"i"ilf,,Q-;,;,~,~l'~'{,: .wt,' . :' f.,..:.r;:::"1;t(....".lll't.::>:e~~..'\~;.;0'-:, r""J,,".~'1 .~:''''",:', "".,r.. ' .,." ~, ! il;~~~ l~~~ f.!1t~tl ~i~R1~~!{~1~'~;~~ ~. 1 MOBILIZATION , LS $3000.00 $3000,00 , ROOT CUTTING 3 TREE $200.00 $600,00 3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT "'" SaYD $2.00 $3060.00 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DRIVEWAYS '" SaYD $4.50 $945,00 , REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAYS AND WALK 20 SaYD $150 $150.00 6 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FUlL DEPTH '''' lINFT $3.00 $690.00 7 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FUlL DEPTH , UNFT $4.50 $22.50 6 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION EV >2, CUYD $15.00 $1800.00 9 COMMON EXCAVATION CV EV 640 CUYD $16.00 $10240.00 " TOPSOIL BORROW CV '" CUYD $20.00 $3100.00 " SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CV '20 CUYD $18,00 $2160.00 >2 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 STREETS CV 370 CUYD $26.00 $9620.00 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE.3" DRNEWAYS LV4 INCl, AGG BASE '" sa YO $23.00 $253000 >4 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE.STREETS LV4 "5 TON $40.00 $4200.00 " BITUMINOUS NON. WEAR COURSE-STREETS LV3 '50 TON $38,00 $5700,00 " BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT. 60 GAL $2.50 $150,00 " RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE , EACH $600.00 $600 00 " ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING , EACH $300,00 $300,00 " ADJUST GATE VALVe BOX , EACH $200.00 $200,00 20 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE 060 LINFT $950 $817000 " 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY APRONS INCl, AGG BASE '" SaYD 38.00 $4 180.00 22 SALVAGE SPRINKLER HEAD , EACH 56500 $130.00 23 INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD , EACH $175.00 350.00 24 4" PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN '50 LF $10.00 $2500.00 25 TRAFFIC CONTROL , LS $1430.00 143000 26 SILT FENCE TYPE PREASSEMBLED 75 L1NFT $2.50 $187,50 27 INLET PROTECTION. FILTER AGGREGATE , EACH $200.00 $400.00 26 LAWN TYPE SOD 685 SQYD $3.50 $2397.50 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO.116.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 12/2912005 SCHEDULE RE" 19th AVENUE SOUTH -1st STREET S. TO THE CUL DE SAC STREET IMPROVEMENTS f...-,,>,~,~ r"'ff~";':&''''''''-''':[:'',(;'l-j: ,'loi;. 'M"'!'~ ~~:;;~:n.f~:~~/:'~!~_S:1. ''f~:'" ,rTE, ~~.,!. .i~' ',_ -,..,r, ~.;f,~'~,~{~ ;yi f7'o;;'l~i~> ~~4t;:/ '.~: '!J:;-: .' '>'iJi~2;t< ',' TOTAL~'.~~~'~;i_ . 1'.:~~!:}~:~4 .' ~.'. . ,:~J{~~~~~~:~ift;~:'1~;H~1{~;~;~~~1; .. '~,? ,. ~:"J;;:F.:t~~""J /i!,. ~)\""'~'. """, ;, ............':l..o$,..,... -;;J .."':- ...'.....'WW..C,...,..,' ';~; . -y.~.~.,~::. ,~<:-g:} {r~~ :;~:{./O'\'..\{O:-t:'.-:.!;t~~ ,: ~'ESTIMATED,\;' );y~i).ttB1DJ:~.T.~;: ...'-', QUANTITY -,'_ ......""/..~;:.\::.:,.(i;~/l'~ .~~\. ';t~ }~,~"'~(~~~~ ,!t,~,~"j.e... '4'.l(UNrr"t;:~ '~U.N~ {\ .{8 PRlceti; i,\, '~~" .<t\:.:~~:..:'. .,' r '/ " _..i- ~ ".i:~_< , MQBIUZA no~ 1 lS $300000 2 ROOT CUTTING 3 TREE S20000 3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT "" SQVD $2,00 . REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ORNEWAYS 230 SQVD "50 5 REMOvE CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAVS AND WALK " SOYD $7.SO 6 $AWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FUll DEPTH '50 U~FT $3,00 7 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FUll DEPTH " lINFT "50 . SUBGRADE EXCAVATION EV ,,, CUVD S15,00 9 COMMON EXCAVATION CV EV 750 CUVD S16,00 " TOPSOil BORROW CV '80 CUVD $2000 " SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CV ,,, CUVD S18.OO 12 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 STREETS C<J 530 CUVD $26.00 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE-)" DRIVEWAYS lV4 INet AGG BASE ,,, SOVD $23.00 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE-STREETS v. ,,, TON $40.00 " BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE-5TREETS V3 ,,, TON $3800 " BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 80 GAL $2,SO " ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING 2 EACH $300,00 " ADJUST GATE VAlVE BOX , EACH $200.00 " CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE 1000 lINFT $950 20 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAV APRONS INCl AGG BASE '90 'avo $3800 " SAlVAGE SPRINKLER HEAD 3 EACH $65.00 22 INSTAll SPRINKlER HEAD 3 EACH $17500 23 4" PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN 250 IF $10,00 " TRAfFIC CONTROl , lS $1430,00 25 SilT fENCE TYPE PflEASSEMBlED " lINfT $2.SO 26 INLET PROTECTION. FILTER AGGREGATE . EACH $200.00 27 LAWN TYPE SOD ." SOYD $350 $3000,00 $60000 $329000 S1035,00 56250 S135O,00 S292SO $210000 12000,00 53 600.00 2521loo 13780.00 $264500 S58OO.OO 7410,00 $200.00 600 00 $200,00 S95OO,00 S722O,00 519500 S525 00 S250000 5143000 18750 00 $2835.00 - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8M] PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 1212912005 SCHEDULE MF" 19th AVENUE SOUTH .1s1 STREET SOUTH TO MAlNSTREET STREET IMPROVEMENTS l':%\"h; ~f~<i[~~'i-4':b i,';j)t" , if,l~U~Mt~ti?~;1~4~~~jl~':;I,. ~n:EM:. ;i~'\}""~\~Ji{~~t!.1;.i~l ~J4~ft1:1~~;~',Vi;',~.~a:~~tj;;:;~r;~..t.;~ti;..~ )~~l;r pD"E!t, ;i~~r~~f.:~:,'(;<}:3:~..f;.~(iilii~{~~'{~'~:~'j;)-:.<~ ;'.;/1, il.'"".:..J\..... )'~~lf:~' ,~S-..~~~t4~' 1':..... ;';.:,..i;J!{f~''1P;.,;~(!.f~!{'/~;r?1.Jt. :\?~~~. ..:t;'; i~L'fA-:... ~':':i:':!'\~d~r-~r-'~;., 7"'i:.&~~>:"...;.).~~:vitj:S~;~,..~.~,j,..~~)t''''~'''>i1'i},;'':4:_ ~'\:,,' ....':>_",' '.~:;;.::'.$>,,<til~, JI'J{J'!t/j '/;~i,~r~rn ...... ESTIMAT. ED~:';.\ ~:i."{i;~'.,,:':~:n~"'UN-iT~": . ,-., ~ ~'r,..'~1: ...;.r....".~!. s>"" . , '.:.;';;':::;':BID'"t'~,{,j,\.. "UNITJi ~,;~PRICE , ",' QUANTriv,~~;'<( '~lf~~'.'t{~ Y~$'lj::'i. <\& \1:-: ~:,~~.:'i.;f;':ii'i;;Lk ~~~~?(J.r~ rx~:~;_2t;r~_~' '.~l\>!'l:(""iiW;';f';i"';; l'it.:.;,',;,' ~~' ,~,.~~~~~~.~;:t:~<:'\:A' '.. '. ,,'(,.",1. 'J-~. 't.~"~ :.:r: \~7;1:'O:rA1.:~L,"",,,?;~~, }';:fJ. '!i2J'" ~""";.~J~~.J("-.'~';:.,, ;itt~~,P.~:r:!~!tM~'fl~~\f~~.~: , MOBILllA TION , LS $3000.00 $3000.00 2 ROOT CUTTING 3 TREE $200.00 $600.00 3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1210 SOYD $2,00 $2420.00 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DRIVEWAYS " SOYD $4" $382.SO , REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AlK AND DRNEWAY " SQYD 7." $300.00 6 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH "" LINFl $3,00 $300.00 7 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FUlL DEPTH 35 LINFT ",. $157.50 . SUBGRADE EXCAVATION EV "' CUYD $15,00 $172500 9 COMMON EXCAVATION CV EV 620 CUYD $16,00 $9920,00 >0 TOPSOIL BORROW cv '" CUYD $20.00 S3 000.00 " SELECT GRAN\AAR BORROW C '" CUYD $18.00 $1070.00 " AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 STREETS cv 350 CUYD $1800 $9100.00 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE-3" DRIVEWAYS V4 INCl AGG BASE 45 saVD $23.00 $1035.00 " BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE-STREETS V4 >0' 70" $4000 $4 000.00 OS BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE-sn~EETS V3 '" TON $38.00 $5320.00 ,. BITUMINOUS MATERIAl FOR TAO< COAT 56 GAl $2,SO $140.00 17 RECONSTRUCT MANHOlE , EACH """00 """00 " ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING , EAO< $30000 S300 00 " ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX , EACH $200 00 $200.00 20 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SURMOUNTABLE 800 lIN Fl $950 $7600.00 21 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY APRONS lNCl AGG BASE 85 sa YO 00 $3230,00 22 SAt VAGE SPRINKLER HEAD 2 EACH $85,00 $130,00 23 INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAO 2 EACH $175,00 S350 00 24 4" PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN 250 LF 10.00 $1 500,00 25 TRAFFIC CONTROL , LS $1430,00 $143000 26 SILT FENCE TYPE PREASSEMBlED 75 lINFT $2,SO $187.50 27 INlET PROTECTION. FILTER AGGREGATE 2 EAO< S2OO00 $400.00 26 LAWN TYPE SOD 790 SQYD $3." $1765,00 I I I I I I 2 I 3 . , . , . I , 10 " 12 13 " I 15 " " " " 20 I 21 22 23 " 25 25 I 27 21 " I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. 116.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 12/2912005 SCHEDULE "G" 20th AVENUE SOUTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS .i""~'~,:, 5ti,;ft1l'''t1.';: -~~:f1t.q,,1~;~;~}.f..~h'~~~~~~'~~~~'~~; "'~1~1:;. ~ITEM.~ J:~tft.~ .3f<~',n~~i':3f.~~~~~~-~j,,:~~~!~?;I.,.'ji~~~~~~~};: ~ ';"'~~{(. .HrEM. ~tt. W..11kf:."r..1.~tr'...:r..".r' <...:ti:,"..~'t,';.'t)~.:-,.::rr.'4I'"A"'i~ rN..O';>~';\:').\.""":~1;:p.,;,,~~..,JWJ~r.i'*.i~\t.1<'~~i~;~'}Al~~i>,''fi: ;';r*;;:~;':4-:~.J..~.) ., . '. "'.<;:-~_'h_"-", :,~',';~ '.'" " ...'~~,,~..-,.<:~.., _.-l~i .,-::~ '-,_ - ",,~:. .. '.:':~'''' fb':di: .'.'. ,,~i~::;;.:" :"~~_ESTIMATEo-'j;' ~~tg~~;~~;~/ .;.~ 'W'6,} .~;.;r,:ti:..r1.;;:~ ;f~~~t~: Al ~'t:.(';.I;i;':'-:t.: ~f.i~y~ :I~ :~~r.~~~l U~rrt&\ ~"XW'~~~(V:~1J;r;~?1?:',:.\ffJt :rl:JNrr.:-i;1!r!tJj6~t:: ~~~jriri',~(;)T ~~:~~"~"t~!i ,.,tt;~t:;.t: 'mPRiCE)"!. :;;'j:~~Y~;:!?~~~f:<I;{.1~h~t"I;~ MOBILIZATION ROOT CUTTING REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT RrvEWAYS REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT DRIVEWAYS AND WALK SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT F\JLL DEPTH SUBGRADE EXCAVATION COMMON EXCAVATION TOPSOIL BORROW SELECT GRANUlAR BORROW AGGREGATE BASE ClASS ~ STREETS BITUMINOUS WEARCOURSE.3" DRIVEWAYS LV4 INCL. AGG BASE BITUMINOUS WEARCOURSE.STREETS LV4 BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE-5TREETS V3 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT RECONSTRUCTMAN~E ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX CONCRETE CURB & GlJITER SURMOUNTABLE 6.CONCRETEPAVEMENT ORIVEWAVAPRQNS INCl AGGBASE SALVAGE SPRINKLER HEAO INSTALL SPRINKLER HEAD 4" PERFORATED PIPE DRAIN TRAFFIC CONTROL SILT FENCE TYPE PFlEASSEM8LEO INlET PROTECTION. FILTER AGGREGATE LAWN TYPE SOD I LS $3000,00 $3000.00 3 TREE $200,00 $600.00 >5, LINFT $5,00 $750,00 2500 sa YO $2,00 $500000 225 SO'D "50 $1012.50 " SOVD $7.50 $75,00 230 L1NFT $3.00 $69000 " UN FT "50 $45.00 EV 20' CUVD $1500 $3075.00 cv EV 1075 CUYO $16.00 $17 200.00 cv 200 CUYD $20.00 $5200.00 cv 205 CUYD $18.00 $3690.00 cv 500 CUYD $26.00 15600.00 '" '0\'0 $23.00 $2645.00 '" TON $4000 $6800.00 2" TON $38,00 912Q,OO '00 GAL $250 $250.00 , EACH $50000 $50000 3 EACH $300 00 $900.00 I EACH $200,00 0000 "00 llNFT $950 $13300.00 '" SOYD $3600 750.00 3 EACH '00 $195.00 3 EACH $175.00 525.00 .50 LF $10.00 $4 500.00 I LS $1430.00 $1430.00 75 UNFT $2.50 187.50 , EACH $200.00 $1 000.00 1315 SOYD $3.50 $4602.50 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T18.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 05-10 SCHEDULE "H" STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ,,#'<t" ,"~'~~ "$;.}~, ""'1'I\V,"'MI<,",l1.>&i, '':1'',;.r~''i'1:'' l~,;r,",'''''''':'; rrr'EM ,,-.~~::;,!\,. )t~~~~:~~~:::'~~~~49,:;;i,,;:;:~!,'.L<~:~';;i; 'r;:. E~TIMAtEO / iiNO;jI;,~ JTEM '/ .';'\.' .::'~f~,)~,'~1'~\~~!~~}~",'~~Y~,;+'{';' ~'!:;~1:r,(;~H:i.A..' :n~~~tt'~' ~;"~.r)'f,~!i .:(~f;;":1tt~':;;';~R;\~i;:';;!.i'.<?5(t~'~{f);":':;':~~:,;'/:~QUAN~TriY) :~'';:~:~~~ -~l~.~~~~ ~fi!-t'~,~~-::'~~~f:ibl~~t~.,.~tl,'~Pe':'I~~ @-~"'-":-";;"~~i .'. ' 1 lr RC PIPE SEWER Cl V DESIGN 3006 STORM 1610 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE 5 3 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE 2 4 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE OES 50.1 19 5 CATCH BA$lN CASTU-IGASSEM8lY 19 6 CONSTRUCT STORM MANHOlE 4 7 STORM MANHOlE CASTING ASSEMBLY 4 ."."'"'~" ''''.''',''1 t<,'<':'.';\~j .;ro,o ~,.(,...,~_ ',,:~?i~t.(~: :,.1UNrf-j~!i" " ,.,,~~ ,i;- .' - - -t -'. : UNrr,,~. thPRICE i' . ;'~'!');.S:\;" :.-ti/~~?t~~ t-#i~*,":, it.t..~~~~ij, IF S36 EACH S200 EACH S500 EACH $1,300. EACH S5OO. EACH S I 700 EACH S500 00 1212912005 ,.,.>>l':~'B'~""" $~,"',!i~i2::}A(f~~;l':: ""'~TOTAi;"'-(;;\'~ ~.\jj~i ,- 1<.7"}.~~ ti~;':'4,~'~iiw.:1fl.!i 57960,00 1000.00 100000 $24100.00 9500.00 S6800,00 S2ooo.oo I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 05.10 12129/2005 SCHEDULE ''I'' SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ~~!,fii"~i l~~,~ '~3.i,\liw.k\ir...;;~~~t,~'~, ;l'1~"'~ii*fr: ,:~;~~i:~;k~,~: %~":;,'~,'t: !"~:~~F :,~!~ii'~~'?~,:~~#:';~~~,l~',',. ',"fT.~M. 1!1i;"r"",,~'t~" ":Vf;':'1~:.~:.t>:E~l!.iiV~, A:{~,' ~ ';'~,.:"~ST, ,I~, JE',D :~~ ~~":":":,' ,~~,UNrr,)~ii r':"';,f!l.t:,":!"I, ',','...;t<Jt.~',' ~r:~O{'~; ~.!TE'1~h '~'~:',t{,i.I,~. iW'i:{~; .1ri 4fi-!; tc;.' .J,~~~.~~?:i};ti::~UN.rTlj; :kt.PRI~~~, ,>!~r;t,~f~~r9!~'r.1Y;~;~ \r:'f~~~'.I;~.Ij/t~<<?&11. ~~~,y;~~~t~i~~<{~k~;~~~i:1~ i~~UANTITY '~;j. ~~1:~~:f :~r;J~;r':.~d.~,~~'t~~r:'),.;<~l.f;::~j;;,A MOBILIZATION a- SANITARY PVC SPOT REPAIR 1 LS 10 LF $50000 $100,00 50000 1000.00 \ \ \ ~ , , , , , , , , " , , AyY\1NDIX-ll ~lGlJRES .. r j' Ji" f \ . II I -c- I ~~~ECT ~~ l L. ) r"~ 1,1 I 'I , \,\0 \ L~, j,~ t, J'rr'.J( j're =J' ,; JIr :. ,~ c- J '1 --- - . ~ . ] l[ ~ ~ I [ ;,~ '~\l,~ ~, ~ MAINSliREET !"~ I" '> /. ;;J I I L.;::a. _ ___ \..-.J I L.,J \._ .J ~ D ""'"'--''---'" --..I V . ~ - ~! ~I "/=F19r;FPe=r,'~'.' I H \ v!;~ II I ~ _...J Y la " J ': ) 'f 1/ I / -EL~ =--= ., Ii ,J t 5 ~ _I- - ] I I J J =--0 -~ - . j ,L..,;, . ,\....J " S2 _ .:=;.G;; J Ii 1,1__ ~ \., ':I) -- [if) - .' L_ I 'r- - ~ 'I' J ;:~ I~,- ~U -~ ~,,1 S,r- -ST S' ~'. I~ if) :z - ' - I if W ~ ill' . J (] ~. I : z~ - <(~" ~ ~ ~ 'll-l~ /",L -;7- - W I - -L-- I "I r >- I- !>! ' I J <( ~ ${~- ,,; ":.. -~ - ~:j -c 1 ~-c' ' ~ 'Il ~... lv" I -.::.~ ====-='--=--:;\ \ ( J - -" ) ~ ./) '( ;;::i: .... ] ",] 'r;~~SI~R ~~VD' J[ '~1i F (, I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROPOSED ~ ....~ " I II JI ~ 11 ~-~ I . I, ., I, ~ , 01 r , I NOT TO SCAI..[ !j\BOL TON & MENK. INC. Consulllng EngIneers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRt.4QNT, MN SLEEPY EYE. UN WILLMAR, I.lN BURNSVlLLE, MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA H:\HOPK\T1621739\F'EAS\21739Ioc.dwo 12-29-2005 3:57 nm CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 ~ ....... (X:. \, '\ , \, \jp..RI'f..5 -- r PROP05'f..O 5\.lRt-/lO\.l1'l1p..6L'f.. C\.lR6 ,"0 cun'" ~ 't \ 2~ \ \ ~ ....... (X:. ,.5" al",.",O\)5 _"'" couRS< ",y;(UR< 1p..CI< COp..1 ," anU""'OU' "0"-- couRS< .,,(\UR< en Cv..55 5 p..GGR'f..Gp..1'f.. 6,b$'f.. 5\.l6GRf>..O'f.. PR'f..pp..Rf>..1101'1 (1I'ICIO'f..l'llp..L) (SU"""",E CoR""'''O"' IS "E"'''') - r ~: s. "\S1~ ST. s. 1'(?\CAL 5(C1\Q}\ \9-ffi~\lL S. 2,01\1 ",\If... l , , , , , , , "\ 5.1\LA\J(.- S. C\T'< Of r\Op\<.\NS 2006 SlREE1 & \J1\1Jl'i \\.\PRO\!Et.\EN1S T'<P\CJ\l SfC1\ON fIG\.lRt. 2 , , , , . 130....'1'01'1 s. ""eNI<. ,NO' ~ consultIng EngIneers lit $Ul"leYors _ ~"" ElEo \,Ill 'Il\~' \,Ill WJ'll'i'10. \,Ill fNlt\>I()ll1'. \,Ill ,:~'".. w,fS '" BURl'lSllu.E. \,Ill C"",,'" M" . , , ~ "'" "" "'" co "" L-J ~ - ~- Jt ~ -0 , - - - 6,- -1- INP 6" ICIP ( ( 8" CP INP 12" RCP 1-1- - - - I 15" RCP I "'" a a "'" I g ~ "'" ~ "'" ~ w "'" ~ LlJ I I \ - NP , , I " V "'" =:J-=a1 ~~ ,---, a OJ 50.0'1 a I . I U) -1 ~ o -.\ "'" -.\ ~ N l1' n ~ '" ~ ~ LEGEND -)- SANITARY SEWER D- O SANITARY MANHOLE 0 -))- STORM SEWER 0 STORM MANHOLE ~ STORM CATCH BASIN -1- WATERMAIN IU) /-1 :;;0 ." ,v ~I FIGURE 3 fTl -1 - U) o 1-'-'- - 'C ~ jo =i JHt: CITY OF HOPKINS STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS 18TH AVENUE SOUTH I 1 ( I ..... fV-( -n- /JI >> / --- INP INP 12" RCP I [ P,2~1 I ~ J f- 2006 NC. MN >> NP RCP ~ - --~ INP 12" RCP- l>' 1 2 tN 1 r=-- I I HYDRANT GATE VALVE EX RIGHT-OF-WAY EX BITUMINOUS EX CONCRETE EX CONCRETE CURB 1\BOL TON & MENK. ConsultIng EngIneers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAJRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WllLMAR. BURNSVllLE. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA AV~~~E I~JUi!H --~ t --- INP 12'~ RCP \_ ((- ~I 1>>_ \: INP 6" CIP -( (- -( ( INP 8" CP r- - , ( LT- - n RCP 2 ( INP 8TH 4 0 50 - . . FEET 12-29-2005 1:29 pm 1 J 50 ~ SCALE H:\HOPK\ T16217J9\FEAS' ( - *=Ji' _,-"U,,~,J 1- -~~( (~ cr- , ,,( N _ ":"~1f .~ -:l i- ~ \ \ I J~ ! 50,0 l+ I \ -J 0- ~\ Z_ (j) --1 AJ r'l r'l --1 -0 ~ '" '" Ul ~ ,,,, ;Ilf) I ':': I "'" " ,--, ~ N '" ,.---, ~ HYDRANT GATE VALVE EX RIGHT -OF-WAY EX BITUMINOUS EX CONCRETE EX CONCRETE CURB LEGEND -)- SANITARY SEWER D- O SANITARY MANHOLE QS> -))- STORM SEWER 0 STORM MANHOLE ~ STORM CATCH BASIN % [ -1- WATERMAIN --' (j) -I ,(j) ;-1 AJ fIl ~ (.f) o C =1 ::r: ~ I-J ~ , v '" J ]0 "'c Z -0 "', '" 1 Z -0 1" N, ~I ::0 FIGURE 4 CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS 18TH AVENUE SOUTH NC MN l ,r;;.:oJi ~C?- - i,-- I- t" ( INP 1- _ v----( -'- - ( __] INP 12" RCP CP ( - n~] >> (~-=-- ~- -', \ INP 12:' RCP I INP IS" RCP - I , ,I . : I ~I I '" '" ~ =:J =r:q ~ ~ N ~ ~ l 50,0 0 I \ \ o l': ?:i o c '" '" z , N\ ^ ." (") MENK & Surveyors MN FAlRMONT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WIUMAR, BURNSVlUE, MN CHASKA. MN AMES. lA It\BOL TON & Consulting Engineers MANKATO. 50 SCALE FEET H:\HOPK\ T16217J9\FEAS~21739EXC' .dwQ 12-29-2005 :29 pm -0 r-- .:0 o ..... N Jr o ~ Lfu ~: 8TH AVENUE S9UTH lJ-1 ~lL~1J -~- J -f "- - I /.,:j INP 16" CIP I I I 9 . ,( N (INP 8" CP ( (=:t' - " 1 I I - ~- - e-~ - >> - - ~ i-~rtr---- 1 f\ I I 50 I I - j--- ~ P- O "'" '" L-.J ~ -e ~ 6" 'CiP (- INP 8 "'" '" CD "'" o o INP 2" RCP 'If:--~ INP 12" RCP '-1 )> :A l/tN 1 x- I ~- FIGURE 5 - ( ~ r= 50,0 CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS 19TH AVENUE SOUTH ~ c III ! f ~ r'l X ) >p- ~ RCP x \- -++ \~~ INP 6" CIP -.lJ. - -I ( NP 8" CP ( ~ ~ ,,:~ ::; I U'J -1 ~4 I [U'J I l:;d I ;6,8~'i=i~ fTl j l~ ~ ,Jg .-1 I ~ 2" RCP l'l "'" LirJ Ii Xj _ xJ -1 ( u NP x INP -6" Clpl ~x -1 1..1~ N ( ( INP 8" CP :....0. r ---- r;-J o o.J "'" I 6 I JA~ENUE SOUTH l ) NC MN U I 1j\E30L TON & MENK Consulting Engineers &: Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAIRMONT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN W1UMAR, eURNSVlLLE. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA 1 ( - ~[\( 11\- ) I 1~11l r--l1~1 N ~ '" u> "'" LJ~ CURB HYDRANT . VALVE RIGHT -OF -WAY BITUMINOUS ::;ONCRETE ::;ONCRETE If: ( ~T~_ ( "'" '" GATE EX EX EX EX 1 II II ) I ~ jUU I ~ I -6- o I~ m 0..( o ITl LEGEND SANITARY SEWER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN WATER MAIN \ f" 2= =I~ 1) . -( - ( CD rf -- - flCl '" '" 50 FEET :29 om I ~ \U -)- o -))- o ~ -1- ---< 2-29-2005 o NP 6 -I' -(- INP 8' 5" RCP ~ '" u> SCALE H;\HOPK\ T16217J9\FEAS\217J9EXC1.dwCl RCP 50 "'" '" o ~ II 1\ ~ ~ LEGEND ->- SANITARY SEWER -6 HYDRANT 0 SANITARY MANHOLE 0 GATE VALVE ->>- STORM SEWER ----- EX RIGHT -OF-WAY 0 STORM MANHOLE EX BITUMINOUS ~ STORM CATCH BASIN EX CONCRETE -1- WATERMAIN EX CONCRETE CURB r ~ U1 x \ '- _ ,A '-- -- I ____I o 5: )> Z fJ) --\ ::;0 [Tl ~ \ I I \ J ~ -X--...J- ~ -;:1;0 1 I ~ -l' tn OJ - ~,.= ~ - - =2 -J> "'" ~J> J> " J> ;0 -' ;:: '" 2 -' U1 J> "N J>, ~U1 ;::-' ",0 ~~ U1 ,- " '" -' :;, 2 Z GJ ~ r r ) U4 I i 1:-- ~ri iD x - ~rvu-, INP 6" CIP -I II It~ L_1 8~' CP 0 ~ (- < J ,--- -- : -i- - - I -- i \ I ~ n AVENUE SOUTH ~)('- m 9TH 1 x --I < ( INP a -Jfr .~. ~ rf.l F-0 -.J '" CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS 19TH AVENUE SOUTH FlGURE 6 ( I [fJ) r;l . -1 I ~ I ~i6,8::>- I :::0 ,~~ III l-L ~ ~ v C =-l I CP INP 6" CIP -~ - -1- ( - NP 8 11-\ \ I -- , NC. "N = L!r-J I , -'_ --Jl '" 1:::"--( ~(- - - " ~ < . - - INP 1\\E3C>L TON & MENK Consulting Engineers Be Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WILlMAR, BURNSVlllE. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. lA 50 SCALE FEET H:\HOPK\ T16217J9\FEAS\217J9EXC1.dwa 12-29-2005 1:06 pm o ~a~ 50 LEGEND -) - SANITARY SEWER -6- HYDRANT o SANITARY MANHOLE i8l GATE VALVE -))- STORM SEWER _n__ EX, RIGHT-OF-WAY o STORM MANHOLE EX. BITUMINOUS ~ STORM CATCH BASIN EX. CONCRETE _1_ WATERMAIN EX. CONCRETE CURB "" "" I~II~ I LLJ SOUTH [1 ~ u }j _. ~ 1- - 1 - tIt- 1 - u . 1 INP_5" F'P ~~./ 1=f=1 I -/ S I~IX < (, ( ( 0 I INP 8" CP .j>. ~ =---=If- t~ 3- ~"----Tl I ~ I g ~ x I z : I == CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS 20TH AVENUE SOUTH FIGURE 7 ~ ~ w lJJ 20TH AVENUE 8- = t x ; 1-1 t I -1- - m -(- ( p-(- ( 0 - =I-l~ "" ~ I -~~- , ---- --* INP 5" CIP -I- I, ( . .( .( INP 15" RCP . ,~. INP 8" CP ( - ~ ~ i-- \ -]- +- I ~ I lJ' NC. "N LJ LJ ~ 11 \ I \ rTJ X n rTJ I (J) o 'l\BOL TON & MENK. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRMONT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WlliltAR. BURNSVlu..E. t.lN CHASKA, MN AMES. /A I ~ I N "" N '" n I ~ I 50 SCALE FEET H:\HOPK\ T1621 7 39\FEAS\217 39EXC 1.dw_g _ 12-29-2005 1:06 pm o IfI 5" RCP 50 NP \ I \ OJ o C I rTJ ~ ::::0 o R NP 30 5 f :>,} LEGEND ->- SANITARY SEWER -6- HYDRANT 0 SANITARY MANHOLE 0 GATE VALVE ->>- STORM SEWER ----- EX RIGHT -OF-WAY 0 STORM MANHOLE EX BITUMINOUS ~ STORM CATCH BASIN EX CONCRETE -1- WATER MAIN EX CONCRETE CURB ~ 1l""o '6'- --" '.J ----1 I o )> < fTl Z C fTl ;, ~ "- ~ I ===.[] u --ouL --=) )-" INP 15" RC - INP - r- #102 [ ~ ST STREET", rOUT - - --- no >> >> ~ ~r 0 0 tD n -~-=l -II - n- ~ #10 n E 1 ST STRE~SOUTiH LJ~ - l=--~ .. , , ) -1- ~ I I ...:::::.....~ --"~ cD' fS 1- ----1, '(0 I ~ ~I \ _ill ------ Z. -__e -c: =1'91- x (J) o - c x ----1 v =l1t 1 "- u '" U') "- ~ "- u '" N "- V ~ _ --"I-~J E:0 -=-f' \ II ] #38 > ~ '--- "- u '" ~~ "- ~ , 7?-"J'?J <(-'\, \ f--- ~~2) v "- U <Xl "- Z V II 'I ~< ^ ^ - I N "- z I '--"'- '"' r. + I I #100 , r o o tD - J ~- "-. I I (J) FIGURE 8 >-- ,'1" "- ~ ~ I'o.~ P "- ~ CITY OF HOPKINS STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING CONDITIONS 1ST STREET SOUTH 2006 NC. "N v 1t\130L TON & MENK, Consulting Engineers & Surveyors MANKATQ, MN FAlRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WILLMAR. BURNSVlLl.E, MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA 50 FEET :29 om o 2-29-2005 SCALE 621739\FEAS\217J9EXC1.dw, 50 H:\HOPK\ T ~ '" -- "' ~ '" -~ -(- ~ -JJ, "- r I - -- -< - < - - - (-- e- T < ~- - ~ ... -- - -:) - ,,- ~- v J - ~_....~~'~-~'~----~ - rr'-:-" <- ~} ~ 9TH~ A~ENU SOUT~) [ ~\I -n'/ :5'-200. \,- ;<i I I I I: \~ ,?)., \\ ~ : ~ ~ I I ~ " I ~ I ).- .-----, "; J:- ~ ~ : il I "" . 0 .. f--~ n{ I' r- cO '" -- ~ J III ' I i: I L : 1:1. I ~ I r ~ I U; I: ~ 1=--1 28;0' .F-... r- ~ ~ r-- J I: ) (1)1 -'~. , i----ir- ~l!:;' Xl ] -fr ~.. .' Irrl c- . . rrll . , 1--4 ~' .1 ~ I . t--- / . (I) I: ,lOI ==' ~ rr~ L: c; I' '" I t' II ~ -,.. o o E 1 ~ I g ,J ~~ PROPOSED -)- SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED C & G 0 SANITARY MANHOLE I I BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT -)>- STORM SEWER 0 STORM MANHOLE ~ BITUMINOUS PATCH ~ STORM CATCH BASIN I" :':" :'.', '1 CONC. PAVEMENT .~ .... t '" '. ... ". -1- WATERMAIN . STORM MANHOLE 0 HYDRANT . STORM CATCH BASIN 0 GATE VALVE 12" STORM SEWER -))- 0 CURB BOX -)- SANITARY SEWER EX RIGHT -OF -WAY l ~ ~ i "" I ~ <'iJ ~ ~ EXISTING lJ ~ - I \ - -::...= -_-- ~~"';-P'~~----:.-i;"'--~"';'.7"'- -, - \ L- v v ; w_ AVENUEllSOlUTH -~ y - ~~~7"" 8TH 1 ~~ l_~_~_~______~- __u - 1 ----'I (-- ^ - -=-_~_i , "k n- " , I t , I I Ul I I I -~ " - ~ .~- '--,.=.,'-] ,^ ( .^ - - - " --- , ----------'~ ~" - .*---~- ---- ~ , -- - - - ---~ '.,'~"n":I Ii ~------- 'Ff 1 ~ _ _ 1 r - - I-I o. I I ~ I ~ ~ -M- 1 r 1 - = '" '" =:J r---- , = o 9 FlGURE :::> o CITY OF HOPKINS STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 18TH AVENUE SOUTH ~ = o --J r 1 "':1 '" ~ -, "" ~ , ,- .r---L-, = N '" n I~ = l '" r 2006 NC "" Ij\BOL TON & MENK, Consulting EngIneers &. Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRMONT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WILLMAR. BURNSVlUE. MN CHASKA, MN AMES, 1.60 50 SCALE FEET H:\HOPK\ T1621739\FEAS~217J9PR01.dwQ 12-29-2005 1:29 pm o 50 "" '" '" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~<_ ~'- ~~ I-:< v I -~ < -=-_~ ) v v .v I ~ - - -:r-~ - 1 - ~ , ~-~-'--~~l'l'~ I p<:A- ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ - - -I~ :_\\ " -?~o- - -1-9JHr ~VEN.U E-I-ScDUIH- ~-lt - - I \ I '0- \\ I l' I ,'I I~I Il)..~ I' , ~ ----.., I::' I I - ----" ~ i:R I ,II :::;t;:o . =:;- .,_ ~Uo- '~ IJ :: I ~ I ~ I ~ I n u; . 111 i :' 5 II I ~~I' --> I ,\, U) 28;0' -F~ - ~rl,.-j J ~ ' ::'-t-~ g IV-4 1 I .~ :;0 l-r-)' m I:' -1- m , I~. , :1 ~ - I , U) I . :1 '1- CD ---, ~i' ~d--c_ = J I I ---:-I en I g I: : I I ::t L-J ~ I ~ J I ';i L l-r- JI _ I: : I ~ L-, Nr-' ~ '------C:J .-J j I ib, I, II 18TH AVEN;UE ,l5~_~-~_~J ~_ I IIIi'll -. - - >>, It ) --- ~ .U-....,I't- X , tJ - 4Jr---=.- :--, \ / /~ --...... "U J ~J."-~~ ~. ~ >> h~' ~ ~ '" = _ ....~..,,~ '-'~ ~c..>'. . ~i - ......... -~- .._._.__.;.....;---..,;;,.""~..-. __.~-_-=;....lLkJ &..LlIm______ . .~. -, ---.--.-.--- ,~-=---- >9- ---- I -.::-.--', ,'-. - \ I - "". ^ ~ -'I- -if- V __ -L - VV --+, ~. ''(~- ~ " 0 -' > ~--~~ 't)> -?' ~. ~~ ";"""'/~'~~'''''7 ~f- ~(--, - - rr - l I Ij~o. - r I ~ ~I i f- III/)., I ." I I I '0 I t ." . I I S L r 1. I - I I ~ -' :=J 1J3 0. I Ii PROPOSED - PROPOSED C & G I I BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT rA BITUMINOUS PATCH I'" ' . I CONC. PAVEMENT . .". ". .:.... .:4 .....\ .' '.~ . STORM MANHOLE .12" STORM CATCH BASIN ->>- STORM SEWER ->- SANITARY SEWER Q > ;0 -<. g s: '" I '" y)> z <: = ,;; Z ~_ :J'd - -~,. (j) \ --\ -\ AJ) L- fTl) I ~-M+ ~-:::~ --\ ell 1 ~ V' \ n. =-- -~ - \ I- - -c ~- ~ ~..."( 1'_ 1 _ 313~:J_NQ':J -- - I ^ '" ') EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN WATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE CURB BOX EX RIGHT -OF -WAY ~ ~ -r-I" - - ~ ->- o ->>- o ~ -1- -6 o @ +7-- , -;+-- j--- \ \ I \ I ':= I ,-f'L-, N 10 -, -, ~ (,..l '" v v o CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 18TH AVENUE SOUTH FIGURE NC. MN 1t\E30L TON & MENK ConsultIng EngIneers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRMONT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WILLMAR, BURNSVlLLE. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA 50 SCALE FEET H:\HOPK~T16217J9~F"EAS\21739PROI.dw(J 12-29-2005 1;29~m ::::J o o 50 ~ ~ ~ EXISTING PROPOSED ) - SANITARY SEWER - PROPOSED C & G 0 SANITARY MANHOLE I I BITUMINOUS -) STORM SEWER PAVEMENT -- 0 STORM MANHOLE ~ BITUMINOUS PATCH ~ STORM CATCH BASIN I".'" ' -I CONC. PAVEMENT . '". 'k ,".. . ".. ~.. <I .' . .: -I - WATERMAIN . STORM MANHOLE -6 HYDRANT -12" STORM CATCH BASIN 0 GATE VALVE -))- STORM SEWER 0 CURB BOX -)- SANITARY SEWER EX RIGHT -OF -WAY \ \ \ \ "'" U L-irJ ;: ~! -- + -- ~ ,- . -=- -~I; - I".~:':tt>:.....l")' ~. X X .li':o:::..i~~. _ ~ . ,___-_-_-~~-J-_ _~~.>:"'_=_=-.-..., _ --~-~--,=.- - -7 ~ _ _ _ IT _ -.... ",","(Sj.- ( ( ) II ' f.' ~ \ l'h - - I ---I -I 1'1 -'""C?;. \ \ , 11 \ I Iii:" '--->0 1.1)., : !r (I) ~ I::> I 111\ j-1 - >1)' '= 4t-_ I ~I h l.N - II (1).- cO o r I ~ )1 tll. ~-L ,I I ~ :--fTl ,fTl ,. rl ~I 28:0' ~ I [ - ----;>oj I (I) J kr CITY I .INS STREET & IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSI ITIONS 19TH A' OUTH x x . FlGURE MN SCALE FEET H;\HOPK\T1621739\fEAS\21739PRQ1.dwQ 12-29-2005 1:29 pm "'" "" o '= o 19TH ~VEN IS'oUTH - --- -'I -I -- 1- j - f- - ---,~,--~ ..--- v - .V - - - - --- --<<. --- - r.. ~!..'~-"""_'~~_.--'C_q--tr~""'---'- - -~JI-- l:: - ijl -." -- ". ~ "'" Cf) '= i ~ I '------', I ':':: ~ N I I N I __ ~I_J~ I I I ~~ I U __ I --t---+- -;--~ . - . ~ - ,-- ~]_~f5--,; -) t- --~-~---rr I lJJ- -' '" o '= o -..) 2006 ~ ~ NC. r Ij\BOL TON & MENK. ConsultIng Engineers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRt.40NT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WIUMAR. BURNSVlUf. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA ;---~ r-~ - l IV '" "" Iv ,------, '= '" 0< 50 r ~ '=;;l:: '" U' - - 50 0 - \ ,.---_=-+-=._____ =_ '4VU~-- - - - "+ d~ l' --~ -' · _ _ ~_ _., , _~L~ - ~ ---(1" .. ' . .- ~~_.......,.. I \ I G "'~~, ->--4 - ~ ,:J I ~ I!l ~ = Ll-J ~ I' .\ + - -11L - --=1lJ:- - " . Ix_-x x i;i) ..., ~-7.----~~~--._-_._' -T"-:'-:.-;-- - I T - / - T ~ - -~,----- cr-=- ~: - (< kt-t - _I~I!-'. ~'-2C?- ., o. \ !~ r-;;, \ I r ~ I ~~ -1 J> " J> ;u ~ 50 f'l Z ~ <.I> J> ~N ;u ~<.I> 50 " ~~ !: ir "1 f'l X = "" o ~ = o .~ " J> -<< \~ =z -J> Cll" ""J> N G - ~ ~, ~ EXISTING PROPOSED - SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED C & G ~) SANITARY MANHOLE I I BITUMINOUS ~ STORM SEWER PAVEMENT :) STORM MANHOLE ~ BITUMINOUS PATCH [iJ STORM CATCH BASIN I,',." . 'I CONC. PAVEMENT :...;....i,..:":. . .. " .- WATER MAIN . STORM MANHOLE {')- HYDRANT -12" STORM CATCH BASIN ;::9 GATE VALVE -))- STORM SEWER (9 CURB BOX -)- SANITARY SEWER EX RIGHT -OF -WAY 2 FIGURE CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 19TH AVENUE SOUTH NC MN ~ 1 :lol, - -.x:- N cu o .,., I .,., AVENUE SOUTH ~ ~Ir - =-.- - - - "'=--=--":'" - -:,-..::. - - - - ~- - -.j...-- r I!\BOLTON & MENK Consulting Engineers &. Surveyors MANKATQ, MN FArRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WILLMAR, 8URNSVlLlE. MN CHASKA, MN AMES. IA 50 0 50 ~ . ~ SCALE FEET H:\HOPK\ T162t 739\FEAS\21739PRQ1.dwq 12-29-2005 1:29 pm Kl .. ~~~ r "'" N -..j " ~ ~-i x 9T~ f = LM cO 1 ~ = o -..j L C & G CONC PAVEMENT STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER SPOT REPAIR "'" o N - -U -+1- u_ A ----- N"k" -----l' ---' J = .. o ~ ~ - I \ -N':;..": ......l.l::n...=-_ _ _ _ _ __ -rL~~=--J -If --------l'l---~~----- II -- '-'~:"-""'-'-' IN -, -~h ." I ." ", I -)- -r - (.{ -l ) ~ o ,-" -=-1 V' I I ;I N 1 _J "" N "" ~ -r ~ -- l n~ ~ I fT1 "U ~ ;;0 ~- l~ , -r- ~ \ \ I \ \ 1Il 3 PROPOSED PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PATCH CD If-- ---j o r--~.:o 8 ( C ~0~ C -f _ I" _:..._tr___=_ JTl ......~ .--t~-I_ I < ~. I < )> ,,( < :;;0 , 1,~ o ~7~- \6', Ul. \ (fl "U o --j ;;0 fT1 "U ~ ;;0 -ll~ o " SOUTH i- -- v ?__ _ _ ~ -----..-,r - -'=____a-. - - - r---.;..,..,....--...........~~.",... - - ---=- - -, - - -~...:- "'( '" FIGURE CITY OF HOPKINS 2006 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 20TH AVENUE SOUTH NC MN I I ~ I'...'. ',..., 'I ' ,'.. ,"., .:. .. ..,.. . . -12" -))- -m- WATERMAIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE CURB BOX EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING -,- -f'>- o o I = L ~~ llJ _ _,,~_~~_~ff0VENUE ~,-' ~E30L TON & MENK. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN FAlRMONT. MN SLEEPY EYE. MN WILLMAR, BURNSVlllE. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. lA 50 . FEET pm :29 o 2-29-2005 SANITARY SEWER SANITARY MANHOLE STORM SEWER STORM MANHOLE STORM CATCH BASIN -)- o -))- o ~ ~ < I '-----" JTl X () JTl I If) o :;;0 50 SCALE H;\HOPK\ T1 6217 J9\FEAS\2 \ 139PRO 1.dwg ~ f rJ PROPOSED -)- SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED C & G 0 SANITARY MANHOLE r J BITUMINOUS -))- STORM SEWER PAVEMENT 0 STORM MANHOLE ~ BITUMINOUS PATCH ~ STORM CATCH BASIN I'... '. I CONC. PAVEMENT ::~'':.'::\'~~ :,~' ~I~ WATERMAIN . STORM MANHOLE 6- HYDRANT -12" STORM CATCH BASIN 0 GATE VALVE -))- STORM SEWER 0 CURB BOX -)- SANITARY SEWER EX RIGHT -OF-WAY EXISTING c I I [:23 T~ L II , 11->> --I!l t' I I I I ,. I l't I I I, II ,55 LJ I II --" ~ t t~l)iii , ::-W"=- ' -;;;. ~--=-= - - - - ...:. -;;;;.~~ ." ~_~_m_~_m_m _. - '''~~,UZ I ( If- -l1"":": I ~ + -+ - ---, fie <<~ . LL Ii' I'l : n ~ r~ _~ I(J) II~ ~ --j II I ---= - - I ~:Jt"'N~_- ~-~ - ~= - ~ ' , , ~ ' I ~ , ~II I I -- /:------n~f-',.,.- _1 :r ' (J) o e =i ~:, _,' I 0. . "'" - it: -~~r I,~ II I XII ,1 I' if- I I, Ii ~ ~ '1 c >> ) ,27 I Il ~~ ~J -~ -1 t:.. 1 5T 5TR~~ ,-SOU:rf1 , i l\:~ -~~~____~~,--_._-=I__- ~, + -dj ----~)>--4l ~ r ~. ^ ^ I J #38 #39 I I I ~ _./ .., -~ 11->> I I, :fF- " t ~ x I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , ~ --" co --j I ~r -Pl Z1 e+ I'l ~v NTS -x #/.0 J J 02 . o j ., I I 41 ,._dl I I I , I , 1 r- ~ , Ii I 4- FIGURE CITY OF HOPKINS STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1ST STREET SOUTH 2006 NC. MN ~ r: !j\E30L TON & MENK, Consulting EngIneers & Surveyors MANKATO. MN F'A1Rt.40NT. MN SlEEPY EYE. MN WIUMAR. BURNSVlli..E. MN CHASKA. MN AMES. IA ~, 50 SCALE FEET 1 12-29-2005 t:29 pm o 50 H:\HOPK\T1621739 f LEGEND LINEAL FOOT ASS SSMENT --________: ,',:a UNIT ASSESSMEN G ~.... t l r- 7 \ .... ~ 1,;J~1J T; ).811 _l~~:.~t___~ --- "/ 8 (~Ll; :.0 !:~~ J- :\; ------------ I>- rj. NO "'JCO ~ ( 0 Lll8 o ~ I ct~ ___f______________ __ ~DOC NO 2871697 - I CITY Of~ HOPKINS STREET & lJTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSE[) PROPERTIES SCHOOL DIS T NO 270 401 40 co o ___t:O cO U) ~16 ~15 ~co 0J ~ \::::- LJO LJO' ~60 OCO Zill co u'J" O~ ON BLVD 40 17 LJO \'2 .58.1'f. N co OfV"') ill lO ~~ 13 ~O I 4 0 fO ro 40 (0 ~ ~ 15 ~ gj 13 '35.28 ~ _ ~ ~ 70 14JI~zl 1~19 ~18 15 [; ;- (IILl)- 40 I~O 60 40 40 ----- 18'LJ5"E ~~ o z u o o 13~. -J ? <.3) 6' El : 3- ~~,-f~ ~~ ~:~~f~~ :~_ 13 8. ~ @:SJ: g~ F i 0"') ! 60.J?__ -- D6(-- r\0 Q 1"'- L,r, ~ I) 1 o (; 1 t~ 5 16E 7 8 OT 100 o ill 58.LJ 5 o o olN ::! 1.1)' t:: ~ 0.2 59.58 D I I I I I I I I I I I I I ill 0"1 2006 EXCELSIOR S89025'5LJ"W 305.5 f~L,AT 16) ~~~q,E~!~9PKINS 521.86 -;'CITY OF MINNETON~A r:;~ DOC N~ 2863gl1 150 ~ NC. MENK, & Surveyors 319119' H CSA~-j NO ~~ 200 - ------- - - 0 ) i8 gg ~I~ BOLTON & I f \ Consulting Engineers OC NO 168233 NOT TO SCALE H:\HOPK\T1621739\FEAS\ossesment.dwg 12-29-2005 1 :06 pm I I I I I 5 FIGURE WILLMAR, MN IA SLEEPY EYE, MN CHASKA, MN AMES. MN FAIRMONT, MN BURNSVILLE. MN MANKATO. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX C PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T16,21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 05-10 18th AVENUE SOUTH -1st STREET S. TO THE CUL DE SAC WESTSIDE EASTSIDE 19th AVENUE SOUTH -1st STREET S. TO THE CUL DE SAC $7,221,43 $7,103,23 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 WESTSIDE EASTSIDE 18th AVENUE SOUTH -1st STREET S. TO MAlNSTREET $5,529.77 $7,876,12 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 WESTSIDE EASTSIDE 19th AVENUE SOUTH -1st STREET S. TO MAlNSTREET $104,66 $102,77 $60,23 $60,23 WESTSIDE EASTSIDE 17th AVENUE SOUTH - MAlNSTREET TO EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD WESTSIDE $73,21 $101,12 $60,23 $60,23 $26,02 NIA 20th AVENUE SOUTH - NORTH OF EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD $76,99 $60,23 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 05-10 I I I ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP TOTAL ASSESSMENT RATE 1st STREET SOUTH RATE FRONT FOOTAGE RATE -1st STREET S. TO THE CUL DE SAC 18th AVENUE SOUTH I $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $67,457,60 $4,818,40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4.818,40 $4,818,40 $4,818,40 $4,818,40 $4,818,40 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 $4,818,40 $4,818,40 $4,818.40 $7,103,23 $7,103,23 $7,103.23 $7,103,23 $7,103.23 $7,103,23 $7,103.23 $7,221.43 $7,221.43 $7,221.43 $7,221.43 $7,221,43 $7,221.43 $7,221.43 $2,150,48 $2,150,48 $2,150,48 $2,150.48 $2,150.48 $2,150.48 S2,150,48 $2,268,68 $2,268,68 $2,268.68 $2,268,68 $2,268,68 $2,268.68 $2,268.68 S4,952,75 $4,952,75 $4,952.75 $4,952,75 S4,952,75 $4,952,75 $4,952,75 $4,952.75 $4,952,75 $4,952.75 $4,952,75 $4,952,75 $4,952,75 $4,952,75 UNIT I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 14 ZIP ~ 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 STATE MN !!lli MN MN MN MN MN !!lli MN MN MN MN MN MN CITY HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS MAILING ADDRESS 135 18TH AVE S 131 18TH AVE S 125 18TH AVES 11718THAVES 113 18TH AVE S 107 18TH AVE S 101 18TH AVE S 100 18THAVES 106 18TH AVES 112 18TH AVES 118 18TH AVE S 124 18TH AVE S 13018THAVES 136 18TH AVE S OWNER NAME2 LINDA K FREDERICKSON KATHY LINDBERG MARIANNE MULVANY KATHERINE A KRAGTORP ARLENE J GULLICKSON JEANNE L SCHULZ JENNIFER M JANIKULA DOROTHY M PEARSON OWNER NAMEl DONNA MAE NELSON GORDON J GULLICKSON JADE M SCHULZ KEITH RZIMMERMANN MARTHA A LUBBERS JEAN H KAEDING BRIAN S FREDERICKSON MARK EDSTROM FREDRICK C MULVANY WADE A KRAGTORP VINCENT P COLEMAN ANDREW D JANIKULA LLOYD S PEARSON RAMONA LEWIS PROPERTY ADDRESS 135 18TH AVE S 131 18THAVES 125 18TH AVES 117 18TH AVE S 113 t8TH AVE S 107 18TH AVE S 101 18TH AVE S 100 18TH AVE S 106 18TH AVE S 112 18TH AVE S 118 18TH AVE S 124 18TH AVE S 130 18TH AVES 136 18TH AVE S PIO# 23-117-22-44<lD55 23-117-22-44<lD56 23-117-22-44<lD57 23-117-22-44<lD58 23-117-22-44<lD59 23-117-22-44<lD60 23-117-22-44<lD61 23-117-22-44<lD62 23-117-22-44<lD63 23-117-22-44<lD64 23-1 17-22-44<lD65 23-117-22-44<lD66 23-117-22-44<lD67 23-117-22-44-0068 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS. MN 8MI PROJECT NO. T16,21739 CITY PROJECT NO, 05-10 I I I TOTAL I ASSESSMENT I ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT RATE CAP RATE $5.119.55 $4,517.25 $4,517.25 54.517.25 $4,517.25 55,541.16 $4,517.25 54,517.25 $4,517.25 $4,517.25 52,686.25 53,914.25 553.399,21, 560,23 560,23 560,23 560,23 ~ 560.23 560,23 560,23 $60,23 560,23 NlA NIA $104,66 5104,66 SI04,66 $104,66 SI04,66 5102,77 5102,77 Si02.77 5102,77 5102,77 576,75 576,75 1st STREET SOUTH RATE $27,91 $27,91 $27,91 $27,91 $27,91 $26,02 $26,02 $26.02 $26.02 $26,02 . $0,00 $0,00 FRONT FRONT FOOTAGE I FOOTAGE RATE -1st STREET S. TO MAlNSTREET 16th AVENUE SOUTH I $76,75 $76,75 $76,75 $76,75 $76,75 $76.75 $76,75 $76,75 $76,75 $76.75 576.75 $76,75 85 75 75 75 75 92 72. 75 75 75 35 .?l. 863 ZIP 55343 55343 55387 55343 55343 55343 55422 55343 55343 55343 40232-5370 55343 STATE MN MN MN MN MN MN MN ~ MN MN KY MN CITY HOPKINS HOPKINS WACoNiA HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKrnS ROBBINSDALE HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS LOtJISVI1.1.E HOPKmS MAILING ADDRESS 1418THAYE S 20 18TH AVE S 10580 UfTI.E AVE 32 t8THAVES 3818THAVES 3518TIlAVES 581942NDAVE N 23 J8rMAVE S 1718THAVES 11 18TH AVES PO BOX 35370 1800 MAlNSTREET OWNER NAME2 SIIIRI.EY A KNUTSON DEBBIE PLACEK-PETERSON C/O CRAIG MC CUllUM JOVSCHWARTZ JUDYLGRACK LORETIAMSWANSON KAREN J DOBBE MICHELLE L RANSA V AGE KFC TAX UNIT YQ67004 OWNERNAME1 LANCE W PREsrON GREGG L PETERSON DAVID MC CUll.UM ANDREW SIllRTS JODY M GRACK RICHARD E SWANSON JAMES R HAGER JOlIN P SLA TIERY MICHAEL A DOBBE ANDREW P RANSA V AGE KFC NATIONAL MGMT CO DAVID PErnT PROPERTY ADDRESS 141STHAVES 20 18TH AVE S 2618rHAVES 3218THAVES 3818111AVES 3518THAVES 2918THAVES 2318THAVES 1718THAVES tlI81HAVES 1728 MAINSTREET 1800 MAlNSTREET PID# 23-117-2244-0024 23-117-22-44.0025 23-117-2244-0026 23-117-22-44-0027 23-117-2244-0028 23-1 ]7-22-44-0043 23,117,22-44-0044 23-117,2244-0045 23-117-22-44-0046 23-117-22-44-0047 23-117-22-44-0034 23-117-22-44-0023 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2006 STREET AND UTlUTY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO, T16,21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 05.10 I I I ."'LI.,........nu... ....VUI.. - I~I FRONT 1st STREE1 TOTAL ASSESSMENT PID# PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER NAMEI OWNERNAME2 MAll.ING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP UNIT FOOTAGE SOUTH ASSESSMENT RATE CAP ASSESSMENT RATE RATE RATE 23-117-22-44-0004 100 19TI1AVES DANIELl NICHOLS SHARON L NICHOLS 100 19TI1 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 1 15,529,77 10.00 15,529.77 $4,818,40 $4,818.40 23-1l7-22-44-ooo5 110 19TI1AVES MAGDALENE D SCHUG lIO 19T11 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 1 15,529,77 10,00 15,529,77 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 23-1l7-22-44-OO06 11419THAVES TIlOMAS E DULAC 11419TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 , $5,529,77 $0.00 15,529,77 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 23-1l7-22-44-0007 12219TI1AVES ROBERT SNYDER SR 17240 CARRANGA DR SAN DIEGO CA 92127 1 15,529,77 $0,00 $5,529,77 14,818,40 $4,818.40 23.117-22-44-0008 126 19TI1 AVES NORMA I RODER 12619TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5,529,77 $0.00 $5,529,77 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 23-117-22-44-0009 12819TI1AYES ROBIN LYNN BURNS 12819TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 15,529,77 $0,00 $5,529,77 14,8'8.40 $4,818.40 23-117-22-44-0010 130 19TI1AVE S ISAAC CASIMIR EV ANGEI.INE CASIMIR 130 19TI1 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5.529,77 $0,00 15,529,77 $4,818.40 S4,818.40 3-117-22-44-0069 135 19TI1AVE S lAMES R STANLEY LAVONNE D STANLEY 13519TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 55.529.77 12.346.35 $7,876,12 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 23-117-22-44-0070 13319TI1AVES DOROTIIY M BREN 133 19TI1AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5.529,77 12,346.35 $7,876,12 $4,818.40 $4,818,40 23-117-22-44-0071 12519TI1AYES ROBERT A SJEBERS CAROL J STR.AND-$IEBERS 12519TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5,529.77 12,346.35 $7,876,12 14,818,40 $4,818.40 23-117-22-44-0072 12319TI1AVES AARON E NIELSEN 12319TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 15,529,77 12,346.35 $7,876,12 $4,818.40 $4,818.40 3-117-22-44-0073 1I519THAVES FLORENCE K OUINN lI519TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5,529.77 $2,346.35 $7.876,12 $4,8t8.40 $4,818.40 23-117-22-44-0074 107 19TI1 AVE S LARRY A HEIMERL 10719TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 15,529,77 12,346.35 $7,876,12 $4,818.40 $4,818,40 23-117-22-44-0075 101 19TI1AVE S DAVID L PEDERSON MARY E PEDERSON 10119TI1AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5,529,77 $2,346.35 $7.876.12 14,8t8,40 $4.818.40 23-117-22-44-0087 11819TI1AVES LEROY A BAER JOAN C BAER lI8 19TI1 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 1 $5,529,77 $0,00 $5,529,77 $4,818.40 $4,818,40 15 $72,276.00 STREET SOUTH TO THE CUL DE SAC UTH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2006 STREET AND UTIUTY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN 8MI PROJECT NO, T16,21739 CITY PROJECT NO, 05-10 ,-. tE lJ r~ VI " , . FRONT FRONT 1st STREET TOTAL ASSESSMENT PID# PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER NAMEI OWNER NAME2 MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP FOOTAGE FOOTAGE SOUTH ASSESSMENT RATE CAP ASSESSMENT RATE RATE RATE 23-117-22-44-0002 40191HAVES RONALD A PETERSON JANET C PETERSON 4019TI1AVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 50 $73.21 $0.00 $73,21 $60,23 $3,01l.50 23-117-2244-0003 4419THAVES ROBYN M GARDNER 4419TI1AVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 47 $73.21 $0.00 $73,21 $60,23 $2,830.81 23-117-2244-0029 3919THAVES JAMES E GOEMAN KIMBERL V A GOEMAN 3919TI1AVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 75 $73.21 $27,91 $1Ot.12 $60,23 $4,517.25 23-117-2244-0030 2719TI1AVES GLADYS M MATIHE1SEN 2719TI1AVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 75 $73.21 $27.91 $101.12 $60,23 $4,517.25 23-117-22-44-0031 23191HAVES CAROL A LARSON 2319TI1AVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 75 $73,21 $27.91 .$101.12 $60.23 $4,517.25 23-117-2244-0032 15 191HAVE S THERESA L ALECKSON 1519TI1AVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 75 $73.21 $27.91 $10t.12 $60,23 $4,517.25 23-117~22-44.0033 1119TIIAVES HENRY KASPAR W1NNIFRED C KASPAR 1119THAVES HOPKJNS MN 55343 85 $73,21 $27,91 $1Ot.12 $60.23 $5,119.55 23-117-22-44-0139 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OAKS OF MAJNSTREET TOWNHOMES 1349 S ROBERT WSTPAUL MN 55118 159.35 $73,21 $0,00 $73.21 $60,23 59,597.65 23-111-22-44-0152 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED OAKS OF MAINSTREET TOWNHOl\.1ES 1349 S ROBERT WSTPAUL MN 55118 189.04 $73.21 $0.00 $73,21 $60,23 $1l,385.88 83039 550,014.39 1st STREET SOUTH TO MAlNSTREET 19th AVENUE SOUTH -, :17; 117 ." '17 17. '" ;I7J 1!7, .-; 17 17. == . PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO. T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO, 05.10 I I I 20th AVENUE SOUTH - NORTH OF EXCELSIOR BLVD FRONT TOTAL ASSESSMENT PID# PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER NAME! OWNER NAME2 MAILING ADDRESS C!TY STATE ZIP ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FOOTAGE RATE RATE CAP 23-117-22-44-0011 145 20TH AVE S GILBERT TWEED 14520THAVES HOPKINS MN 55343 ?~;J-;/'.'i.A;;;~$!l $76,99 $60.23 $4,818.40 23-117-22-44-0012 13720TH AVE S PAULBKUYPER SARA Y KUYPER 137 20TH AVES HOPKINS MN 55343 70 $76,99 $60.23 $4,216.10 23-117-22-44-0013 13120THAVES JAMES G ROMPORTL LAURlNDA M ROMPORTL 13120THAVES HOPKINS MN 55343 70 $76.99 $60,23 $4,216.10 23-117-22-44-0014 109 20TH AVE S JEFFREY T DULAC 109 20TH AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 75 $76,99 $60.23 $4,5t7.25 23-117-22~16 111 SHADY OAK RD TUTIlE HOPKINS HOLDING LLC 6055 MCKINLEY PL EXCElSIOR MN 55331-6110 185 $76,99 N/A $t4,243.1S 23-117-22-44~76 11520THAVES RANDY S KIENITZ PAM I KIENITZ 115 20TH AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 70 $76,99 $60,23 $4,216.10 23-117-22-44~77 12120THAVES BARBARA E FARBER 12120THAVES HOPKINS MN 55343 70 $76,99 $60,23 $4,2t6.10 23-117-22-44~78 123 20TH AVE S DONALD E OlSEN MAUREEN OlSEN 16407 TEMPLE DR MINNETONKA MN 55345 70 $76,99 $60,23 $4,2t6.10 23-117-22-44~79 122-12420THAVE S STEVE B GR01TING KAREN GR01TING 18040 SHAVERS LA WAYZATA MN 55391-2738 65 $76,99 $60,23 S3,914.95 23-117-22-44~80 12820THAVES DEREK MANN 128 20TH AVE S HOPKINS MN 55344 73 $76.99 $60,23 $4,396.79 23-117-22-44~81 140 20TH AVE S MARILYN A JOHNSON 140 20TH AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 125 $76,99 $60,23 $7,528.75 23-117-22-44~83 29-10720TH AVE S HOPKINS HOUSING AUTHORITY & REDEV AUTH 1010 ISTSTS HOPKINS MN 55343 192 $76.99 $60,23 $11,564.16 23-117-22-44~84 10420TH AVE S DONALD G MUEHLBERG 10420111 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 64,7 $76,99 $60,23 $3,896.88 23-117-22-44~85 10220111 AVE S SALLY K 111RONE 102 20111 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 64,7 $76.99 $60,23 S3,896,88 23-117-22-44-0086 4020111 AVE S DAVID LEE WYAIT 4020111 AVE S HOPKINS MN 55343 62,6 $76.99 $60.23 $3,770.40 1337 $83.628.11 I I I I I I Approximated front footage '_~~~I~~~JJ};-51/#, I I I I I I I I I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 2006 STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF HOPKINS, MN BMI PROJECT NO, T16.21739 CITY PROJECT NO. 05.10 I I I 17th AVENUE SOUTH. MAlNSTREET TO EXCELSIOR BLVD I ASSESSMENT $1,951.50 $1,951.50 $1,951.50 $1,951.50 $2,393.84 $2,081.60 $2,081.60 $2,081.60 $2,081.60 $2,081.60 $2,081.60 $1,952.28 $24,641.72 ASSESSMENT RATE $26.02 $26.02 $26,02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 $26.02 FRONT FOOTAGE 75 75 75 75 92 80 80 80 80 80 80 75,03 947,03 ZIP 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55343 55318 55343 STATE MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN CITY HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS HOPKINS CHASKA HOPKINS MAILING ADDRESS 14 17TH AVE S 201711lAVES 26 17111 AVE S 3217THAVES 38 17TH AVE S 10217THAVES 10817THAVES 11417THAVES 120 17TH AVES 12617THAVES 212 CHESlNUT ST 13617THAVES OWNER NAME2 BETH J STONE MARY R STODOLA RUTH M SCHLIEP OWNER NAME I MANUEL SOTELO MICHAEL R STONE BETH A BOLSTAD ANDREW D BOHACH R A STODOLA MELVIN P SCHLIEP SHELLY A ROBERTSON JAMES H GELO llIllAN H GILBERTSON SCOTI D BURT GARY E DUNN GAYLE J ROBBINS PROPERTY ADDRESS 1417THAVES 2017THAVES 2617THAVES 3217THAVES 3817THAVES 10217THAVES 10817THAVES 114 17TH AVE S 120 17TH AVE S 12617THAVES 13017111 AVE S 3617111AVES PID# 23-117-22-44-0038 23-117-22-44-0039 23-117-22-44-0040 23-117-22-44-0041 23-117-22-44-0042 23-117-22-44-0048 23-117-22-44-0049 23-117-22-44-0050 23-117-22-44-0051 23-117-22-44-0052 23-117-22-44-0053 23-117-22-44-0054 1 I I I I I I ,I 1 I I ,I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX D GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A Geotechnical Evaluation Report Geotechnical Evaluation Hopkins Street Borings Hopkins, Minnesota Prepared for City of Hopkins Professional Certification: I hereby certity that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly LJ'It..~\\\\ll~,'i!i~/li...ional Engineer under the laws .~~".... ~~~~ ofthe State':~~""unnes(j[",O)>'~ i!r:J~./' "'If;? ~ " :.-.~ ~'"~.~~ -= :,Ci'lhl,.,'P.;)r}ld1 "I"!":r" :, t":~ I~' - Fa ;::-"'" _ "IJ'~': :;: l":~'> !<i:l: Christo~l!j>~. Keb11li9E it!:! .~ 'i'.......~ /'.((}~. StaffEngihAeJS~<:'~1l "'.c.90Il'........ ~.. ~ .)"," <:...~~t' ~~ License NumblJi;'J,;~'r.lfil'~o':< November] I, 200~ Project BL-05-03808 Braun Intertec Corporation BRAUN INTERTEC Broun Intel1ec Corporation I rOOt Hcrnpsnrre AV~)I\\JC> 5 Mmneopolr$, MN 55438 PhOf1~ 952.995.2000 fo', 957..9952020 Vv'eb' brolJninrenec.com November II, 2005 Project BL-05-0380S John Bradford, PE City of Hopkins 10 10 ] st South Hopkins, MN 55343 Re: Geotechnical Evaluation Hopkins Street Borings Hopkins, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bradford: We have completed the geotechnical evaluation for the proposed street and utility improvements in Hopkins, Minnesota. Our evaluation was completed in general accordance with our proposal for Geotechnical Evaluation dated on September 22, 2005. Please refer to the attached report for a detailed summary of our results and recommendations, We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If we can provide additional assistance or observation and testing services during construction, please call Chris Kehl at 952.995.2386 or Greg Bialon at 952.995.2380. Sincerely, BRAUN ]NTERTEC CORPORATION ~~~ Christopher R. Kehl, PE Staff Engineer ~r ~ G~yQ~~ Associate - Senior Engineer Attachment: Geotechnical Evaluation Report c: Marcus Thomas; Bolton & Menk georpt street borings n '/' _".I .._ ,.._u.._....~1 ~_I"':".'A ~:_~~ lOl;'7 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table of Contents Description Page A. Introduction............. ......... ....... .......' ...................".....'.............. ......,...,.......................... ...... I A. J. Purpose ................................................."...........,...........................,...,'.................. I A.2. Scope.......................................................................,.............................................. I A.3. Information Provided............................................................................................. ] Ao4. Locations and Elevations..................................,.................................................... 2 A.5. Site Description........................................................,..,..........................................2 B. Results ...... .................. ...... ............... ............. .......................................... ........ ..................... 2 B.]. Logs ............................................................................,.......................................... 2 B.2. Soils,....... ..........,.. ......... ............. ......... ................................. ....... .....' ,............. ....... 3 B.2,a. Pavement Section..................,......................................,...........................3 B.2.b. Fi II........... ......... ....... ...... .......... ................ ............ ............................. ........ 3 B.2.c. Granular soils ........................................................................................... 3 B.3. Groundwater ..................................................,.......................................................3 8.4. Laboratory Testing.........,................................................................,...................... 4 C. Analyses and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 4 C.]. Proposed Improvements......................................................................................... 4 C.2. Utilities................................................................................................................... 4 C.3. Pavements .................................................................,................,........................... 5 C.3.a. Subgrade Preparation ...................,..,........................................................ 5 C.3.b. Proofro II. ........ ...... ......... ................,..... ........ ....... ......,..... ...... ,...... ............. 6 C.3 .c. Design Sections ............. ....................,........... ...... .............. ........... ............. 6 D. Construction .,..................,..,.....................................,....,................,.................................... 6 D.I, Excavation ....."..............................................,....................................................... 6 D.2. Observations ..............................................................,......,....................................7 D.3. Testing ................................................................................................................... 7 Do4. Cold Weather Construction ................................................................................... 7 E. Procedures.. ............. ......... ........... ........... ........... .... ................... ,..................... ..................... 7 E.]. Drilling and Sampling.,.............................................................,............................7 E.2. Soil Classification .........,........................................................................................ 8 E.3. Groundwater Observations .................................................................................... 8 F. General Conditions ..........................................,................,.................................................8 F.I. Basis of Recommendations ..................................,.................."............................. 8 F.2. Review of Design...................................................................................................9 F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations......... ....... ...,........... .............. ........ ,............. .......... ......... 9 FA. Use of Report............:....................................................................... .....................9 F.5. Level of Care .........................................................................................................9 Appendix Boring Location Sketch Log of Boring Sheets ST-l to ST-7 Descriptive Terminology 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 A. Introduction A.l. Purpose The purpose of this geotechnical evaluation was to assist in evaluating the subgrade suitability for support of the proposed street and utility improvements. A.2. Scope The following scope of services was established in our proposal dated September 22, 2005. Our scope of services was limited to: . coordinating the locating of underground utilities near the boring locations. . conducting seven penetration test borings to nominal depths of about 15 feet below existing grade (actually drilled to about 20 feet). . classifying the samples and preparing boring logs. . perfonning a limited laboratory testing program. . ana]yzingthe results of the field and laboratory tests, . fonnulating recommendations for earthwork and suitability of the subgrade soils for the proposed pavement and utility construction. . submitting a geotechnical evaluation report containing logs of the borings, our analysis of the field and laboratory tests, and our geotechnical recommendations. A.3. Information Provided We were provided with no documents relating to this project. We did discus the project with Marcus Thomas of Bolton & Menk who related the following infonnation. . Utilities to be installed consisted of city water, sanitary sewer, and stonn sewer . Pavement to be designed for traffic consisting of automobiles, delivery vehicles, and weekly sanitation pick up 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November 11,2005 Page 2 A.4. Locations and Elevations The seven boring locations were selected and marked by Bolton & Menk and were located in the field by taping off of exiting structures with a fiberglass tape. The approximate locations of the borings are plotted on the attached Soil Boring Location sketch. The borings were placed in front of the following street addresses. . ST -] at 115 20th Avenue South ST-2 at 27 19th Avenue South ST-3 at 118 ]9th Avenue South ST-4 on ]st Street South between 18th Avenue South and 19th Avenue South ST-5 on 1st Street South between 17th Avenue South and 18th Avenue South ST-6 at 1]2 18th Avenue South ST-7at32 ] 8th Avenue South . . . . . . The surface elevations at the boring locations are to be detennined Bolton & Menk's surveyors. Elevations were not available at the time of this report. A.5. Site Description The borings were located in the existing street in a residential area. This area is roughly bound by ] 7th Avenue South on the east, 2nd Street South on the south, 20th A venue South on the west, and Main Street on the north. B. Results B.l. Logs Log of Boring sheets indicating the depths and identifications of the various soil strata, penetration resistances, laboratory test data and groundwater observations are attached. The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the penetration test samples and auger cuttings, The depths shown as changes between the strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions and the depths of the changes vary between the borings. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November] I, 2005 Page 3 Geologic origins presented for each stratum on the Log of Boring sheets are based on the soil types, blows per foot, and available common knowledge of the depositional history ofthe site. Because of the complex glacial and post-glacial depositional environments, geologic origins can be difficult to ascertain. A detailed investigation of the geologic history of the site has not been performed, B.2. Soils B,2,a. Pavement Section Bituminous pavement ranging from about 2 1/2 to 6 inches thick was encountered at the boring locations. An aggregate base was not observed below the pavement. The granular base material generally consisted of a fine to medium grained silty sand, which was dark brown in color with small amounts of gravel, and is likely a recycled or pit run material. B,2.b. Fill Fill was encountered in the borings ranging from 2 to 9 feet below the surface. The fill generally consisted of poorly graded sand with silt and silty sand. A majority of this material can be reused as structural fill, provided debris and organic materials are removed and the fill is properly moisture conditioned so compaction can be achieved. B.2,c. Granular soils Granular glacial soils consisting of poorly graded sand, poorly graded sand with silt, and silty sand were encountered below the fill. The penetration resistances in the sandy soils ranged from 5 blows per foot (BPF) to 50 blows for 3 inches, indicating relative densities ofloose to very dense. Most of the penetration resistances ranged from II to 30 BPF, indicating a medium dense relative density. Many of the higher blow counts were due to gravel and cobbles encountered while drilling. B.3. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in the soil borings except ST-2 and ST-5. Water was observed at a depth of about 13 to 19 1/2 feet while drilling, Immediately after the auger was withdrawn, groundwater was not observed to cave-ins ranging in depth from about 4 to I] feet. Based on these observations, it appears that groundwater is approximately 13 to 19 1/2 feet below grade. Seasonal and annual fluctuations of the groundwater level should be expected due to seasonal and annual weather variations. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November] 1, 2005 Page 4 B.4, Laboratory Testing Select samples were tested for moisture content and sieve analysis. The test results are in the right-hand margin of the attached boring logs next to the sample tested. Moisture contents ranged from about 3 to 10 percent in the sandy soils. These moistures indicate that the soils are near or below the optimum moisture contents. Two test were performed which measured the percentage of fines passing the number 200 sieve, these tests aid in the classification of the soils. C. Analyses and Recommendations C.l. Proposed Improvements We understand the utility reconstruction will include city water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer, We understand a study of traffic loadings was not completed, It is our understanding these streets are to remain dead end streets and that loadings will consist of automobiles, delivery vehicles, and weekly sanitation pick up. C.2. Utilities The natural soils that were encountered by the soil borings are generally considered non-corrosive to metallic conduits. For utilities supported in the fill, we recommend specifying non-corrosive materials or providing corrosion protection unless additional tests are preformed to demonstrate the soils are not corrosive. The on-site sandy soils and a majority of the previously placed fill soils are judged to be directly suitable for utility support. ]fsome of the utilities terminate in soft soils (blow counts less than 4) or perched water, some surface compaction or crushed rock may be required to provide a stable subgrade for pipe support. Based on the soil boring, some groundwater, either perched or the regional water table could be encountered during the construction of deep utilities. Because the onsite soils are primarily granular, it is our opinion that sump pumps may not be able to control groundwater levels, Depending on the final depth of utilities well points may be required to keep utility excavations free of water. We recommend a contingency be provided in the case that dewatering would be required, The utility trench backfill placed in paved areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor density to within 3 feet of sub grade and ]00 percent within the upper 3 feet. We recommend the moisture contents of clean sand engineered fill soils be within 3 percentage points of optimum to within 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November] ], 2005 Page 5 feet of subgrade, and not exceeding one percentage point over optimum in the upper 3 feet. To be consistent with the pavement design, the fill placed should be granular in nature, consisting of SP, SP- SM, or SM with less than 20 percent fines. If soils not meeting our recommendation are used for fill, we recommend moistures be no less than] percent below or more than 3 percent above optimum moisture. C.3. Pavements C.3.a. Subgrade Preparation The optimum method for subgrade preparation would involve the removal ofthe existing pavement, vegetation and topsoil, and the resulting subgrade be scarified to 1 1/2 feet, to no more than ] percent over optimum and recompacted to a minimum of 100 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density. Where fill is required, we recommend that it consist of mineral soil similar to the native sandy soils, The pavement subgrade should then be brought back to grade with engineered fill. This will result in existing fill being left in place in the road subgrade. There is always risk of an unknown amount settlement in fill without records ofit's placement. However, based on the borings and considering the proposed roads follow the layout of the existing roads, it is our opinion the risk offuture settlement of the fill soils by leaving them in place is probably not significant compared to the cost of a total excavation. This is risk that must be assumed by the owner. Depths of recommended corrections are listed in Table]. Table 1. Recommended Excavation Depths for Pavement Correction Elevation of Apparent Groundwater*/ Feet 12.9 Borin!!: ST-I ST.2 ST-3 ST-4 ST-5 ST-6 ST-7 Apparent Pavement Thickness/Inches 41/2 5 5 6 3 21/2 4 Apparent Fill Denth/Feet 4 6 7 2 4 6 9 ]804 ]7.9 ]8 19.6 It should be noted that excavation depths will vary between boring locations. The actual depths should be determined in the field at the time of construction. We recommend the pavement section be stripped to the underlying natural soils or to the loose silty sand fill. Organic soils in the upper three feet should be removed prior to the placement of engineered fill. The excavation should be oversized at least I foot beyond the outside edge of the toe of the roadway embankment for each foot offill placed below the bottom of the toe of the roadway embankment. The exposed soils should be then surfaced compacted with 5 passes of a 4-foot minimum diameter vibratory smooth drum roller. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November 11,2005 Page 6 The engineered fill placed in paved areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor density to within 3 feet of sub grade and ]00 percent within the upper 3 feet. We recommend the moisture contents of the engineered fill soils within 3 percentage points below optimum to within 3 feet of subgrade, and not exceeding one percentage point over optimum in the upper 3 feet. To be consistent with the pavement design, the fill placed should be granular in nature, consisting of SP, SP-SM, or SM with no more than 20 percent fines. If soils not meeting this recommendation are used for fill, we recommend moisture contents not be less than] percent below or more than 3 percent over optimum moisture. C.3,b. Proofroll As a final check prior to placement of the aggregate base, we recommend the entire paved area be proof rolled. This precautionary measure will assist in detecting localized soft spots. Any soft spots noted during the proof rolling process may require additional subcuts. A qualified geotechnical engineer should observe the proof rolling process to make a final evaluation of the subgrade. C.3.c. Design Sections Based on the borings, it appears the subgrade soils will consist mainly of silty sand soils. We would assume the roads to be used mainly by automobiles, with occasional use by trucks for sanitation, moving and deliveries. For pavement design, we recommend an assumed Hveem stabilometer R-value of30 be used. We recommend a pavement section of2 layers of bituminous totaling 3 1/2 inches and 8 inches of aggregate in these road areas. We recommend specifying Class 5 aggregate base mee~ing the requirements of Mn/DOT (Minnesota Department of Transportation) Specification (Standard SjieJiibations for Construction, Article) 3138. We recommend a bituminous section meeting the requirements of Mn/DOT Specification 2360. We recommend the crushed aggregate base be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. We recommend the bituminous mixtures be compacted to a minimum of95 percent of their Marshall densities. D. Construction D.I. Excavation It is our opinion the soils encountered by the borings can be excavated with a backhoe or front-end loader. The borings indicated the sand and silt soils in the sidewalls of the excavations would be Type C soils, under Depaltment of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November II, 2005 Page 7 D.2. Observations We recommend that all excavation and footing subgrade be observed by a geotechnical engineer to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered by the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. Oversize of excavations below footing grades should be checked. These observations should be conducted prior to placing backfills, fills or forms for footings, D.3. Testing We recommend density tests of backfills and fills placed beneath footings. Samples of proposed backfill and fill materials should be submitted to our testing laboratory at least three days prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and determination of their optimum moisture contents and maximum dry densities. We recommend at least 1 density test for every ]00 cubic yards offill placed beneath the road with at least one test for every 2 feet offill placed. We recommend at least I test for every 250 feet of utility line placed and with at least 1 test for every 2 feet of fill placed. D.4. Cold Weather Construction ]f site grading and construction is anticipated during cold weather, we recommend that good winter construction practices be observed. All snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading. No fill should be placed on soils, which have frozen or contain frozen material. No frozen soils should be used as fill, E. Procedures E.l. Drilling and Sampling We performed the penetration test borings on October 4, 2005, with a truck-mounted core-and-auger drill equipped with 3 1/4-inch inside-diameter hollow-stem auger, Sampling for the borings was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1586, "Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils." We advanced the boreholes with the hollow-stem auger to the desired test depths. A ]40-pound hammer falling 30 inches was then used to drive the standard 2-inch split-barrel sampler a total penetration of I 1/2 feet below the tip of the hollow-stem auger, The blows for the last foot of penetration were 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November 11, 2005 Page 8 recorded and are an index of soil strength characteristics. Samples were taken at 2 1/2-foot vertical intervals to the termination depth ofthe boring. A representative portion of each sample was then sealed in a glass jar. E.2. Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedure)." A summary of the ASTM classification system is attached. The samples were then returned to our laboratory for review of the field classifications by a soils engineer. Representative samples will remain in our Minneapolis office for a period of 60 days to be available for your examination. E.3. Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottoms of the borings, the holes were probed through the hollow-stem auger to check for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after withdrawal of the auger, the holes were again probed and the depths to water or cave-ins were noted. The borings were then backfilled and patched with a cold patch. F. General Conditions F.l, Basis of Recommendations The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the soil borings performed at the locations indicated on the attached sketch, Often, variations occur between these borings, the nature and extent of which do not become evident until additional exploration or construction is conducted. A reevaluation ofthe recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional construction costs, and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perf 01111 the observation and testing program for the site preparation phase of this project. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings, and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 City of Hopkins Project BL-05-03838 November] 1, 2005 Page 9 F.2. Review of Design This report is based on the design of the roads and utilities as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the designs and specifications. With the review, we will evaluate whether any changes in design have affected the validity of the recommendations, and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. F.3. Groundwater Fluctuations We made water-level observations in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. These data were interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short, and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. F.4. Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of City of Hopkins and their design team to use to design the proposed utility improvements and street reconstruction and prepare construction documents. ]n the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analyses and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. F.5. Level of Care In performing its services, Braun Intertec used that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of its profession currently practicing in the same locality. No warranty, express or implied, is made. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) .. i 4""";" I lnatreet 0ST-1 Q) ~ ~ l~~ ,~<> o denotes location of soil borings BRAUN lNJERIEC II III ~ ~ ~ 0ST-2 L 0ST-4- 0ST-7 III J i - 0ST-3 0ST-6 ~ II IL 0ST-5 '" '" . J;'~1,,~ "<. 2ildSlS'~;;;~,'~ Soli Boring Approximate Location Sketch Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota t North Irrr DATE' SHEET DRAWN BY: CRK 10/22/05 1 APP'O BY: CRK OF JOB NO. BL-05--03BOB 1 DW<l, NO, FIGURE NO. SCALE 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 BRAUN'. INTERTEC LOG OF BORIN( Braun Project BL-05-03808 BORING: ST-l GEOTECHNICAL EV ALVA TION LOCATION: See attached sketch, Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota DRILLER: B, Oldenburg I METHOD: 3 114" HSA AUlohammer DATE: 10/3/05 SCALE: 1"=4t Depth MC Tests or Notes feet ASTM Description of Materials BPF WL 0.0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % 0.4 Bituminous Benchmark: Surface 0,7 FILL I'\FILL: Siltv Sand fine-orained little Gravel dark brown moist. elevations were not 1.2 FILL \FILL: Poorlv Graded Sand fine- to medium-Qrained brown moisr. required for this project. ,.. FILL FILL: Clayey Sand, fine- to medium-grained, little Gravel, dark - brown1 moist. 6 9 '- 4,0 SP .....::: POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with a trace 0 c- ':"' Gravel, light brown, dry to moist, medium dense to dense, - II 3 -;;; ...... (Glacial Outwash) ,.. ,',:::., - g .. 'fJ ....... ';: - .... 34 Only Gravel recovered. e "" - . .. "" ::.:' ~ .... ..... 0 - ,.... - .~ ...... ..... ;; i-- ....... - 28 ~ e ":X'.;: 11 C- ..... - ....... - .... ..e ....... ~ f... - 14 'Sl- ~ Waterbearing at 12 1/2 feet. An open tri"angle in the i c- o,. - water level (WL) column C- .. - indicates the depth at '0 ":,', " ,. which groundwater was '~- .. - 40' observed while drilling. ~ "':",:: Reddish brown at 15 feet. : ~ - - > Large gravel in cuttings at l6to 20 feet. · Higher blow count :g ..... - likely due to Gravel. 0 ,. ~ ~ .::)::~': t:l - - ~ ~ ~ - ..:.',:: :","., -20,5 .... - 16 .... '::,:':', - END OF BORING. - Water observed at 12.9 feet while drilling, - ~ 0 ~- Water not observed to cave-in depth of6,9 feet immediately after ~ withdrawing the auger. 0 ~- - S- Boring immediately backfilled, - <:> g ",- " '" ;;:- - <:> ~- 0 g- - -' u tn- - '" '" ?5- - ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BRAUN'" INTERTEC LOG OF BORING Braun Project BL-05-03808 BORING: ST-2 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION LOCATION: See attached sketch, Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota DRILLER: B. Oldenburg I METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Antohammor DATE: 10/3/05 I SCALE: 111=4' Depth feel ASTM Description of Materials BPI' WL Me Tests or Notes 0,0 Symbol (ASTM D2488 or D2487) % 0,4 m Bituminous - FILL FILL: SIlty Sand, fine- to medium-grained,with a trace of Gravel, _ dark brown, moist. - - 2 8 - - - - - - 3 -;; 6,0 c SP POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, ,51 "':", ,;L light brown, dry to moist, medium dense to very dense. - ~ (Glacial Outwash) 13 ...... :8- ,. ~ .... .... , . ~- ':::.:. - ..... ,51 ~- ....... - 18 ] ',' v - -.:'.:: - ~ ~- 59' Only gravel recovered, v v ::'.:"::. .c - - · Higher blow count ~ ., 14,0 .. likely due to Gravel 0 SM SILTY SAND, fine-grained, with Sandy Silt layers, light brown, c 'g- moist, medium dense. _ 20 I- (Glacial Till) ~- :~ - - 0 ~ v Q- v v 19,0 (I) SM SIL TV SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, reddish brown, 20,0 wet, very dense. I 50" .. 30 blows for a 6-inch \ (Glacial Till) set, then 50 blows for 6 - END OF BORING. inches. - Water not observed while drilling, - ~ 0 ti- Water not observed to cave-in depth of8.4 feet immediately after ~ 0 withdrawing the auger, " s- - b- Boring immediately backfilled, - co ~- - ;:i 01 .,- - co ~- - M 0 co_ - 3 ~- - ;l 5- - ;:i 01 --..-----... .. -...-. 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BRAUN'" INTERTEC Braun Project BL-05-03808 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota BORING: LOG OF BORINC LOCATION: See attached sketch. ST-3 I METHOD: 31/4" HSAAutohammer DATE: DRILLER: B, Oldenburg Depth feet ASTM 0.0 Symbol 0.4 FILL - - - - - -;A. s .~ 7.0 .;: e :15- .. ~ ~- .2 ~i- ]1- ~ <2 -I- " " .c t .21- g .~- ~ ~- :~'- ~ CL " " VJ 19.0 SP '. : SM -20,5 - . '" ~- ~ " s- 5- o L ;1 " ;::- o " ll- M " 8- ... " ~ ,..- " 5'" ~ Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) Bituminous ~ FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with a trace of Gravel, _ ~ dark brown to brown, dry to moist. - .... . POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-grained, with Gravel, light brown, dry, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) - '.,", ..... .....:. ...... ...... No gravel at 15 feet. .,'.,.; ':,~: :. ..... :....... ,';:., ...... SIL TV SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, waterbearing, loose, - ;', {Glacial Till' END OF BORING. Water observed at 18.4 reet while drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 4 feet immediately after - withdrawing the auger, Boring immediately backfilled, - 10/3/05 I SCALE: 1" =4' BPF WL Me % Tests or Notes 4 4 - - - 4 '- 16 - 27 - - 29 - - - 20 - - - Yl. 8 - - - - - - - - - 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 BRAUN'. I NTE RTEC Braun Project BL-05-03808 GEOTECHNICAL EV ALVA TION Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota BORING: LOG OF BORING LOCATION: See attached sketch. ST-4 DRILLER: B, Oldenburg Depth feel ASTM 0,0 Symbol 0.5 FILL 2,0 SP- SM ~ .2 ... .~ or> ~ .. o c ,2 ... ! 6.0 o '0 c l .~ 'c o II Q o o ~ 19,0 20.5 :8 ti ~ II b .., z '" ~ " a: .., 18 S .., g t) in < " s ~ '" SP- SM SM ,:':":', .": . ".". METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) Bituminous FILL: Silty Sand, fine-grained, little Gravel, dark brown, moist. POORL V GRADED SAND with SILT, fine- to medium-grained, 6 with Gravel, tan, dry to moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) POORL V GRADED SAND with SILT, fine-grained, Witll a trace of Gravel, light brown, dry to moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) With Gravel at 12 to J 9 feet. :'; SIL TV SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, dark brown, waterbearing. medium dense. Glacial Till END OF BORING, Water observed at 17,9 feet while drilling, Water not observed to cave-in depth of I 0.7 feet immediately afte withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled. 10/3/05 SCALE: )"=4' BPF WL MC p200 Tests or Notes % % 6 5 26 27 26 26 26 4 5 '5l- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BRAUN'. INTERTEC Braun Project BL-05-03808 GEOTECHNICAL EV ALVA TION Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota 4.0 SP ", ~ g ;;! 'S: ~ .0 .0 ~ .... o c ,2 ;;! ~ o '0 c .~ ... .~ 'C u ~ u Q u u </} 19.0 SM 20.5 ~ o ~ ~ b o Z => ~ '" ., o ~ ~ o 9 i.! '" < '" ?j < '" '" LOG OF BORIN( BORING: ST-5 LOCATION: See attached sketch, METHOD: ) 1/4" HSA AUlohammer DATE: DRILLER: B, Oldenburg Depth feet ASTM 0,0 Symbol 0.3 FILL Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) Bituminous FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, with a trace of Gravel, dark brown to brown, dry to moist. "',:":..' ....... ',,: ',.: ~ :: ....... .... POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel, light brown, dry to moist, medium dense to dense. (Glacial Outwash) ..... ...... ,', ':.:.,. ,', :::\: ...... ::.:.~::.:::.~ ...... '..,'.:: .:: ~:. '::. ;"':',. ,.'::.. ,",,','. ',"::. ;....::.. ". :~ . , " SIL TV SAND, fine- to medium-grained, with Gravel, brown, moist~ medium dense. END OF BORING. Water not observed while drilling, Water not observed to cave-in depth of 4.9 feet immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled. 10/3/05 BPF WL MC % 13 21 34 26 18 50' 22 SCALE: 1"=4' Tests or Notes 4 4 · 50 blows for 3 inches. Higher blow count likely due to Gravel. Only gravel recovered. Hard drilling 16 to 20 feet. All teeth broke off auger. I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BRAUN" I NTE RTEC Braun Project BL-05-03808 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota DRILLER: B, Oldenburg Depth feet ASTM 0.0 Symbol 0.2 FILL ~ 5 "i 'S; e ~ ~ .... o c o .~ ~ 6,0 SM '. 2 g 'g ~ " .fi H Q II en 19.0 SM 20.5 M . ti '^ ~ is q 5 ~ <Xl c: " '" II 8 ~ u 0; " <Xl Z ;:0 ~ BORING: LOG OF BO RINC LOCATION: See attached sketch. ST-6 METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Au,ohammer DATE: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) Bituminous FILL: Silty Sand, tine- to medium-grained, little Gravel, dark brown, moist. Trace of roots at 5 feet. SILTY SAND, tine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, light brown, moist, medium dense to dense. (Glacial Till) '. " SILTY SAND, tine- to medium-grained, with a trace of Gravel, brown, waterbearing, loose. Glacial Till END OF BORING, Water observed at 18 feet wbile drilling. Water not observed to cave-in depth of 6 feel immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled. 10/3/05 BPF WL MC % 10 7 6 22 24 34 50' 7 SCALE: 1"=4' Tests or Notes No recovery. · 50 blows for 6 inches, Higher blow count likely due to Gravel. Only gravel recovered. Sl. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BRAUN'" I NTE RTEC Braun Project BL-05-03808 GEOTECHNICAL EV ALVA TION Hopkins Road Borings Hopkins, Minnesota BORING: LOG OF DORIN( LOCATION: See attached sketch, ST-7 DRILLER: B, Oldenburg Depth feet ASTM 0.0 Symbol 0,3 FILL 1.4 FILL ~ = ,2 ;;; .S: ~ ~ o g .~ J! 9,0 SP ,...',' METHOD: 3 1/4" HSA Autohammer DATE: Description of Materials (ASTM D2488 or D2487) 12.0 Bituminous FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to coarse-grained, little Gravel, brown, dry to moist. FILL: Silty Sand, fine- to medium-grained, little Gravel, brown, moist. .::".:::.::': ':::.:~:~:':::: POORLY GRADED SAND, medium- to coarse-grained, with Grave!, brown, dry to moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) " .. . ., SP ,. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-grained, light brown, moist, >:{.: .... medium dense, ....... (Glacial Outwash) 14,0 '.,'.:: SP <:~:: ::. POORLY GRADED SAND, fine- to coarse-grained, with Gravel, ...... light brown, moist, medium dense. '....: (Glacial Outwash) ....... ." 'C '::':::'.~': ~ u , . Q '.... u .,.....:; u 19,0 .. en ..... SP .' POORLY GRADED SAND, fine-grained, with a trace of Gravel, .::;. 20.5 light brown, waterbearing, loose. . .. Glacial Outwash ~ 9- ~ ~ b " ;i => ;2 " ., " " Iii: 8 " S " ;;; < " 7- " ;2 " END OF BORING, Water observed at 19.6 feet while drilling, Water not observed 10 cave-in depth of II feel immediately after withdrawing the auger. Boring immediately backfilled. 10/3/05 SCALE: 111=4' BPI' WL MC p200 Tests or Notes % % 4 2 10 3 18 15 14 5 5 15 Sl. I Descriptive Terminology Rev. 101 I. ~iL I !!!!!'l'"'''''' Partlc1e Size Identification Boulders ............................., over 12~ Cobbles ...............................3-1012" Gravel Coarse. ..................."..... 3f4-lo 3- Fine ................................. No.4 to 314" Sand Coarse .............._............. No. 4 10 No. 10 Medium ........................... No. 1010 No. 40 Fine ................................. No. 40 to No. 200 Slit ........................... .,_ ....... <No. 200. PI < 4 or below "A" line Clay..................................... < No. 200. PI~ 4 ar on or above -AM line Standard 0 2487 - 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Soils Classification Group Symbol <!NV GP GM GC SW SP SM SC CL ML OL OL CH MH OH OH PT Criteria for AssIgning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a Group Name b Well-graded gravel" Poorly graded gravel II Silt raveldt~ Cia e veldr, Well-graded sand h Poorly graded sand h Silty sand 'ph Cia e sand 19h Lean da k'", Siltk I III Organic day k I m n Organic silt k I m 0 Fatela kl", Elastic sittkI tit Organic day m p Organic sill k I II' q Peat I CII~4and1s.Cos. 3c C <4andfor1 >C >3c Gravels. with Fines Fines elassif as ML or MH Morelhan 12% fines 0 FinesclassifyasCLorCH Clean Sands C" ~ 6 and 1 S. Co s.J C Less than 5% fines I ell < 6 andfor 1 :> C >3 c Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH Morelhan 12%1 FinesdassifyasCL erCH Inorganic PI:> 7 and plots on orabo"'e~A"linel PI < 4 Of plots below ~A"linel Uquid limit- o...en dried Li uid limit - not dried PI plots on or above "A" line Inorganic PI plots below "A" line liquid limit. oven dried l' uid limit * not dried Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor Gravels More than 50% of coarse fraction retained on NO.4 sieve Sands 50% or more of coarse fraction passes No.4 sieve Clean Gravels less than 5% fines II c .,0 :g~ U)._ Q) 'CS~ ~ l!:!.0 .i!~8 '1""'" ~~~ ~- o~ E I Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ..............................,..Oto 4 BPF Loose.....................................,..5 to 10 BPF Medlumdense................,.........11 t030BPF Dense ....................................... 31 to 50 BPF Verydense................................over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Soils Verjsoft...............,...........,........Oto 1 BPF Soft ........................................ 2 to 3 BPF Rather soft ................................4 to 5 BPF Medium .....................................6 to 8 BPF Rathorsllff ................................910 12 BPF Stirf ............................."..."..., 13 to 16 BPF Verystiff ,........................".........17to30BPF Hard ...................................,....o...er30 BPF I ~ ~= =u o~. wg;[i -g !.'w .5 e8 eo", Q> 5 ' ~o~ U:#: o '" Highly Organlo Soils Slits and Clays liquid limit less than 50 I Organic <: 0.75 Silts and clays liquid limit 50 or more I Organic < 0.75 a. Bascd on lhe malenal passing Ihtl 3-1n (75mml sieve. b. If field sampl(l eonlaKlOO eobbm Of boulders. Of both. add "with CObbles Of bouldef$ or both-lo group name. c. CII =: 0110/0'0 Cc"~~ OWX060 d. If soil eontalfls ~15% sand. add "with sand~ to group name, e. Gravels wilih 5 to 12% lines requlre dual symbols: GW-GM weH.graded grave{ with silt GW-GC weII-graded gravel wllh Clay GP.GM poorly graded gravel wilh sllt Gp.GC poorly graded graV$1 with cl;iy r. II litlos classify as Cl.Ml. use dual symbol GC.GM or SC...$M. g, If lines are organic,. adO "wil!\ organic lines" to group name. h. If soil oontains ~ 15% gr<Wel. acid "'wllh graver 10 grOlJf) name i. SandswiUt 5to 12% lines require dualsymbots: $W-SM well-graded sand with slit SW.sc well-gradod sand with clay SP-$M poorly graded sand with sin SP.SC poorly graded sand with clay j. If A1lefberg limits plot in halched' area. soil is a CL.Ml. sllly day. k. If $011 contains 1510 29% plus No. .200. add "with sanel" Of"'with graver whichever ispre<lominant. t. If $011 contains ~ 30% plus No. 200. predomiNinlly sand. acid .sanely" to group name. m. If soil contalns'~ 30% plus No. 200 prodominantly gravel. add "9'<Iveily'" to group name n PI ~4andplotsonorabove.A"1in(t. o. PI < 4 or plalS below .A'lIne, p. PI plots on or above .A.line. q PI plots below .A* line. 60 I Drilling Noles Standard penetration test borings were ad...anced by 30" or 6[;'. 10 holfow-stem augers unless noted otherwise, Jelling water was used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "sr (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2" 00 split-tube sampler. ex. cept where noted. Power auger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diameter continuous- flight. solid.stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in-- (erred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore. somewhat approximate, Power augar borings are designated by the prefix~B." Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1." or 3;,1" diam- eter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could be manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are Indicated by the prefix "H." BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration test. also known as "N- value. The sampler was set 6" into undisturbed soil betowthe hollow-stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6" increments and added to get BPF. Where they differed significanlly. they are reported in the following form: 2/12 fer the second and third 6~ increments. respeclively. WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil underweight ofhammer and rods alone; driving not required. WR: WR Indicates the sampler penelrated soil under weight of rods alone; hammer weight and driving not required. I I I I I 50 ~ 40 e;. ~ 30 '0 .5 ~ 20 '0 "" '" .. 1i: 10 7 4 ., L 00 10 16 20 30 I I MH rOH TW indicates thin-walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Note: All tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. MH or OH I 40 50 60 70 60 90 100 110 Liquid Limil (LL) Laboratory Tests DC Organic content. % S Percent of saturation, % SG Speciticgravily C Cohesion. psf o Anglo of internal friction qu UneonfinecJ compressive strength, psf aD Pocket oenetrometer strenalh. tsf I DO WD MC LL PL PI P2000 Oryden'lly. per Wet density, pcf Natural moisture content. % Uqiuid limit. % Plastic limit, % Plasticity index, % % passing 200 sieve I BRAUI INTFRTF I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX E QUESTIONNAIRE/MEETING MINUTES I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF HOPKINS PUBLIC WORKS-ENGINEERING DIVISION 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Mailed: November 28, 2005 Due: December 9, 2005 Reference our September 21, 2005 letter: Street improvements are proposed for your street in 2006, Your comments, concerns wiD assist us in determining the scope of improvements. 1, STORM SEWER, STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND SURFACE EROSION _I have observed street ponding after a significant rain. It is located at: _Areas of erosion along the boulevard are observed at: 2, SANITARY SEWER _We have not experience any problems with our sanitary sewer service, _We have experienced problems with our sanitary sewer service, Please contact us, 3, GENERAL COMMENTS I QUESTIONS Please offer any additional information you would like to be considered as a part of these improvements: The following information is optional and will remain confidential but is needed in the event we have a question on any of your responses: Name: Address: Phone No,: PLEASE FOLD TmS FORM IN HALF, SECURE AT OPEN END WITH TAPE, AND MAIL (NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED). THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Neighborhood Meeting 2006 Street & Utility Improvements City of Hopkins, MN BMI Project No, T16,21739 December 19, 2005 City staff present: Steve Stadler, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer, John Bradford, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Bolton & Menk, Inc. staff present: Marcus Thomas, P.E., Sarah Rippke. E.I.T, Attendance: approximately 24 residents I Introductions II Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) III Feasibility Report 1, Proposed Improvements 2, Estimated Costs IV Water Service Program V Assessment Po]icy/ Assessment Rates VI Project Schedule / Construction Process VII Questions Other items of discussion: I - Drainage at sideyard of35 18th Avenue South. Backyard is low -front yard is low too, owner has built up a concrete lip at garage door to prevent water from draining into garage. 2 - Pine trees on 20th Avenue South, screen Subway Parking Lot, owner requests they stay or be replaced 3 - Two "home" daycares within project area (19th & 20th Avenues South) concerned with access during construction. 4 - Some residents have two existing driveways will they be able to keep both driveways? (118 19th Avenue South) I