Loading...
Memo Parking Ramp SecurityIII. CONCLUSION CITY OF HOPKINS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 8, 1996 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council OM: Paul T. Steinman, Community Development Specialist SUBJECT: February 13 Council Work Session -- Parking Ramp Security I. PURPOSE OF MEMO The purpose of this memo is to outline for the Council various issues that staff has researched regarding increasing ramp security. The Council asked that staff begin to explore this issue, due to the cinema project being undertaken and the anticipated increase in usage of the parking ramp due to this project. II. PRIMARY ISSUES TO CONSIDER o Will there be a ramp security issue with the new development? Staff discussed this matter with Police Captain Jim Liddy. His feeling is that Hopkins is not perceived to be a major crime area and additionally he stated there likely would be no significant increase in crime due to expanded evening use of the ramp. He feels that crimes will be related more to property damage and not bodily harm to ramp users. o What are the ramp security alternatives? Staff foresees a variety of alternatives available to increase the level of ramp security. These issues are as follows: • Increasing police patrol in the ramp • Increasing technical monitoring /surveillance devices • Installing additional interior lighting and /or other physical upgrades Attached to this memo is information associated with upgrading the technical monitoring /surveillance abilities in the parking ramp. In addition, Community Development and Police Department staff will be available at the work session to discuss the other issues. January 29, 1996 PARING VEDI ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING RESTORATION 1129 WASHINGTON AVE SO., MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55415 612/333 -4670 ARCHITECTURE James D. Kerrigan Director of Planning / Econ Dvlpnrt. City of Hopkins 1010 First Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: City of Hopkins Parking Facility Security System Addition Dear Mr. Kerrigan, This letter is in response to the meeting that took place on January 16, 1996 between Mr. Kerrigan, Mr. Steinman and Mr. Vedi at which time, Vedi Associates' (VA) letter of June 6, 1995 was discussed regarding the City of Hopkins Parking Facility. It was established to proceed with the Parking Facility Security System Addition in phases. The following three phases were discussed. PHASE ONE: Install 911 telephones at each stair tower. The location was mutually agreed upon at the grade level stair towers. The phones shall be directly communicable with the 911 operator by lifting the phone handle. No dial system shall be involved. Estimated Budget Cost Estimate of Phase One: Hard Cost (4 Phones) $ 5,000.00 Soft Cost $ 840.00 PHASE TWO: In addition to 911 telephones, install 22 call stations with two way speakers connected to the City of Hopkins designated control station by pressing the "help" button at the speaker (call station). Communication can be established between the person at the call station and the operator at the security station. Help can be dispatched from the security station to the designated call station. All call stations will be numbered in conjunction with the response station numbers at the security station. Estimated Budget Cost Estimate of Phase Two: Hard Cost of 22 call stations @ $350 / each $ 7,700.00 Soft Cost $ 940.00 VA January 29, 1996 VEDI ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING RESTORATION 1129 WASHINGTON AVE SO, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55415 612/333 -4670 ARCHITECTURE James D. Kerrigan Director of Planning / Econ Dvlpmt. City of Hopkins 1010 First Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 RE: City of Hopkins Parking Facility Security System Addition Dear Mr. Kerrigan, This letter is in response to the meeting that took place on January 16, 1996 between Mr. Kerrigan, Mr. Steinman and Mr. Vedi at which time, Vedi Associates' (VA) letter of June 6, 1995 was discussed regarding the City of Hopkins Parking Facility. It was established to proceed with the Parking Facility Security System Addition in phases. The following three phases were discussed. PHASE ONE: Install 911 telephones at each stair tower. The location was mutually agreed upon at the grade level stair towers. The phones shall be directly comnnmicable with the 911 operator by lifting the phone handle. No dial system shall be involved. Estimated Budget Cost Estimate of Phase One: Hard Cost (4 Phones) $ 5,000.00 Soft Cost $ 840.00 PHASE TWO: In addition to 911 telephones, install 22 call stations with two way speakers connected to the City of Hopkins designated control station by pressing the "help" button at the speaker (call station). Communication can be established between the person at the call station and the operator at the security station. Help can be dispatched from the security station to the designated call station. All call stations will be numbered in conjunction with the response station numbers at the security station. Estimated Budget Cost Estimate of Phase Two: Hard Cost of 22 call stations @ $350 / each $ 7,700.00 Soft Cost $ 940.00 Security System Addition City of Hopkins January 29, 1996 Page -2- PHASE THREE: In addition to Phases One and Two, install 23 cameras over looking the 22 call stations and one extra camera at the exit near the future cashier's booth. These cameras will over see the area where the call came from. Those cameras will be monitored, operated and focused from the security station. Budget Cost Estimate for Phase Three: Hard Cost 23 Cameras $1600 / camera $36,800.00 Monitor Screens and Console $ 5,000.00 Soft Cost $ 6,200.00 The budget cost estimates indicated here are preliminary costs of the probable construction cost based upon work completed in February 1996. This cost shall be updated at the time of construction. The cost involved to connect the wiring from the Parking Facility to the City Hall is not included here. Also, please add to the estimate approximately 8% for Construction Contingency Unknowns. Mr. Kerrigan, as discussed in the above referenced meeting, this is a very tight budget based upon costs of recent Parking Facility Security Projects. Please review and advise if VA can be of any further assistance. Thank you for the opportunity to assist the City of Hopkins. v S. Vedi, AIA President 1 FA