Loading...
CR 96-83 Street Improvements - 95-16May 1, 1996 Assessment Hearing 1996 Residential Street Improvements Project 95 -16 Council Report 96 -83 Proposed Action. Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council adopt Resolution 96 -35, Resolution for Adoption of the Assessment Roll, Proiect 95 -16, Burnes Drive and Sweet Briar Lane Reconstruction. Overview. At its April 16 meeting Council opened a public hearing concerning special assessments for street reconstruction on Burnes Drive and Sweet Briar Lane. Council heard assessment appeals but took no final action concerning them or the final adoption of the assessment roll. Council chose to continue the hearing and instructed staff to reinform property owners of the deferred assessment program and its procedures. Revised public hearing notices were mailed as well as a deferred assessment policy flier. Three appeals concerning this assessment have been submitted to date. Appeals must be submitted no later than the hearing date. Primary Issues to Consider. O Hearing procedures O Project costs and assessment rates O Appeal procedures and action on appeals Q Adoption of assessment roll Supnortina Information. O Hearing notice O Affidavit of mailing and mailing list O Bid tabulation O Project costs worksheet o Assessment roll O Location map O Appeals O Resolution 96 -35 J! s Gessele Engineering Superintendent Analysis. O Hearing procedures Staff recommends the following procedure in carrying out the assessment hearing: 1) Staff summary discussion of project costs, assessment rates, and the assessment appeal procedure. 2) Staff summarizes individual appeals and notes recommended Council action. 3) Public hearing is opened and property owners can make their case before Council. 4) Hearing is closed and Council acts on individual appeals. 5) Council adopts assessment roll by resolution. O Project costs and assessment rates The total amount to be assessed in both projects was derived from the low bidder tabulation and the revised Estimated Project Costs worksheet. The bid tabulation is organized according to schedules that reflect their funding sources. The worksheet then organizes the various improvement components to which contingency engineering, and admin. /legal costs are applied. Refer to these two sheets for detail. Once the residential 70% share of street reconstruction was determined, that amount was divided by the established total assessable footage in each project. In the case of the Burnes /Sweet Briar project an adjusted front footage was derived in which lot areas vs. total street length were used as determining factors. Maximum footages of 125 feet and minimum footages of 75 feet were applied. • Appeal procedures and action on appeals Property owners are given the opportunity to approach Council with their appeals during the public hearing. Standard appeal forms have been available at City Hall and need to be submitted no later than the hearing date. Staff will make recommendations on all appeals. Council had heard appeals at the opening of the hearing at the April 16 meeting and had taken preliminary action on them. When it became apparent that Council wished to continue the hearing, it rescinded its action and kept open final action on appeals submitted to that date as well as on future appeals. The following are appeals concerning Project 95 -16: 1. Address: 326 Sweet Briar Lane Assessed Amount $2,474.25 Appeal for senior citizen deferment by reason of limited income. • Recommendation: Grant appeal on basis that petitioner meets all qualifications for a senior citizen deferral. 2. Address: 331 Burnes Drive Assessed Amount $3,587.00 Appeal for cancellation of assessment by virtue that street's age precludes reconstruction. An overlay is recommended by the owner. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that pavement condition surveys and age of street indicate reconstruction is the most cost effective project to undertake. 3. Address: 323 Burnes Drive Assessed Amount $4,123.75 Appeal for cancellation /revision of assessment on basis that assessment at this time is unfair to new owners and that former owners should pay. Recommendation: Deny appeal on basis that City cannot know when real estate transactions will take place and that the City places assessments against land parcels and not individuals. 0 Adoption of the assessment roll Staff recommends passage of Resolution 96 -35 for adoption of the assessment roll. CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING REVISED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of Hopkins, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 7, 1996, to reconvene a public hearing and to hear all persons concerning the adoption of the assessment roll for Public Improvement Projects 95 -16, 95 -17 and 95 -17A and to adopt the assessment roll as presented or amended. This hearing is scheduled pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 and continues a hearing opened on April 16, 1996. The assessment roll as herein described is on file in the office of the City Clerk. AREA TO BE ASSESSED: Sweet Briar Lane and Burnes Drive (Project 95 -16). Total Amount to be Assessed is $79,260.72 AREA TO BE ASSESSED: 7th Avenue South from 7th to 8th Street South; 8th Avenue South from 6th to 7th Street South (Project 95 -17). Total Amount to be Assessed is $95,327.21 AREA TO BE ASSESSED: Alley east of 6th Ave. South, between 7th /8th Streets South (Project 95 -17A). Total Amount to be Assessed is $31,113.95 All persons who wish to be heard, or to object with reference to this matter may present their cases at this hearing, either orally or in writing. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of any assessment adopted unless a written objection signed by the property owner is filed with the Assessment Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Even though appeals are due by the hearing date on May 7, 1996, the City Clerk strongly recommends that appeals be submitted to the Assessment Clerk's office by May 1, 1996. Appeal forms will be available at the assessment hearing or at the Assessment Clerk's office at the Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to MSA Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City of Hopkins within thirty (30) • days after the adoption of the assessment and by filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor and City Clerk. Under provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 the City may, at its discretion, defer the payment of assessments for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The procedures to apply for such deferment are available from the Assessment Clerk. Deferment applications should be submitted to the Assessment Clerk by May 1, 1996. The following information shall also apply: 1. The property owner shall have the right to prepay the entire assessment. Your assessment may be paid without interest from May 7, 1996 to June 6, 1996, to the Assessment Clerk at City Hall, 1010 1st Street South, Hopkins Minnesota. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the Assessment Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made by November 27, 1996 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 2. Partial prepayment of the assessment in excess of 25 percent of the total assessment has been authorized by ordinance. A partial prepayment can only be made prior to November 27, 1996 with interest accrued to the payment date, except that no interest shall be charged if such partial payment is made by June 6, 1996. 3. In the case where accrued interest applies, the rate of interest to be accrued, if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period, is proposed to be 8 percent commencing on the date of adoption by the City Council. Assessments shall be payable in annual installments over a period of 10 years. 4. The amount to be specially assessed against your property is shown on the statement of assessment sent to you by mail. This is an important hearing because this is your last opportunity to be heard on the matter of this assessment which affects your property. If you have any questions regarding this assessment, please call the Engineering Department or the Assessment Clerk at 935 -8474. as A. Genellie, City Clerk ty of Hopkins, Minnesota April 22, 1996 Sincerely, ames Gessele Engineering Supt. JG /rr C I T Y O F H O P K I M S Dear Hopkins Property Owner: The City Council at its April 16 meeting took action to continue the hearing concerning special assessments for an improvement project affecting your property to May 7. Because the hearing is being continued, your right to appeal your assessment is extended to the May 7 Council meeting. Assuming the assessment roll is adopted on May 7th, the period of time in which you can pay your special assessment without interest is now revised to May 7 -June 6 The Council wishes senior citizens to be aware that they may be eligible to use the City's deferred payment of assessment program. The program is available to owners 65 years of age or older whose annual income does not exceed $21,000. It is also available to citizens permanently or totally disabled regardless of age. The person seeking a deferment must supply income verification annually by submitting a federal income tax form, or written verification from the Social Security Agency, or a copy of the latest Social Security check. In the case of disability, verification must be submitted in the form of a physicians statement. Verification needs to be supplied before the closing of the assessment hearing on May 7. The deferment period is limited to 10 years and must be renewed annually. Deferred assessments accrue simple interest during the deferment period at a rate equal to the interest rate established for your special assessment. Please note the revisions to the attached hearing notice as shown in bold type. Please call me or Robin Robertson, Assessing Clerk, at 935 -8474 should you have any questions or would like to appeal your assessment. 1010 First Street South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Phone: 612-935-8474 Fax: 612 An Equal Opportunity Employer • AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNCIL OF HOPRINS James A. Genellie, being first duly sworn, deposed and says: I am a United States citizen, over 21 years of age, and the City Clerk of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota. On April 22, 1996, acting on behalf of the said city, I deposited in the United States Post Office at the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, copies of the attached notice of hearing on proposed assessments, Street Reconstruction, Project 95 -16, enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon fully prepaid, addressed to the following persons at the addresses appearing on the attached copy of the mailing list. There is delivery service by United States mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed. n 4 - 2 9 a 4: Signa Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of April, 1996. Notary Public JAMES T. GESSELE NOTARY IUIIIC MINNESOTA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 31, 2000 Project 95 -16 Street 24- 117 -22 14 0056 J ^SEPH C SPELTZ NN L SPELTZ BURNES DR KINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0059 WALLACE G LINDAHL ETHEL LINDAHL 318 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0062 DONALD M FLARE CHRISTINE M HENKELS 331 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0075 GREGORY AANENSON MARY P AANENSON 338 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0078 JOSHUA D KUTZLER 320 SWEET BRIAR LA F ^DKINS, MN 55343 IP-117-22 14 0081 LAWRENCE V FLARE VIRGINIA FLAKE 302 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0084 DONALD E MINNICK HELEN MINNICK 337 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0087 JOHN H RUDDY DANA L RUDDY 319 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 =22 14 0090 COLIN MACKENZIE 301 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0057 BERNARD N BENSON PATSY A BENSON 334 BURNES DR. HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0060 HAROLD E SCHEPPER ESTHER SCHEPPER 310 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0063 CHARLES GERDTS NANCY GERDTS 323 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0076 STEVEN D LENTO CAROL J LEHTO 332 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0079 MICHAEL P CAMPBELL KIMBERLY A CAMPBELL 314 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0082 KEITH S LINDQUIST MARY LINDQUIST 349 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0085 DONALD W DAVIS MARY DAVIS. 331 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0088 PAUL JOHNSON CAROLE JOHNSON 313 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0095 EDWARD E GLYNN MYRTLE GLYNN 315 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24-117-22 14 0058 BERNARD C LARSON 326 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0061 WILLIAM P ROLFE PEGGY ROLFE 302 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0074 DAVID W CONKEY COQUI A CONREY 344 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0077 MILDRED L WINGE 326 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0080 RICHARD A HOLTE BEVERLY HOLTE 308 SWEET BRIAR LA HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0083 MARY A GOULD 343 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 140086 WILLIAM WALTERS MARY ROSE WALTERS. 325 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0089 ERNEST R SEVERSON CLARICE SEVERSON 307 SWEET BRIAR LN HOPKINS, MN 55343 24- 117 -22 14 0097 ARTHUR E JOHNSON EDNA JOHNSON 307 BURNES DR HOPKINS, MN 55343 BID TABULATION PROJECT: OWNER OPENING DATE: ENGINEER SWEET BRIAR LANE AND BURNES DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION: SCHEDULE 1.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER 3 COMMON EXCAVATION 4 SUBGRADE CORRECTION 5 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 6 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 7 2331 TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 8 2331 TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE 9 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 10 BIT. D/W RESTORATION (2" THICK) 11 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONTROL JOINT 12 CONC. CURB & GUTTER, D412 13 CONC. CURB & GUTTER, B -618 14 CONC. D/W RESTORATION (6" THICK) 15 CONC. SIDEWALK RESTORATION 16 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER 17 TRIANGULAR VALLEY GUTTER SECTION 18 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 19 ADJUST EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE 20 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING 21 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 22 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) 23 BOULEVARD SODDING 24 SUBGRADE PROCTOR 25 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE 158006LB.XLS PAGE 1 1996 RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS (158- 006 -20) CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA MARCH 15, 1996 MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS SY LF CY SY RDSTA TN TN TN GAL SY LF LF LF SY SY SF EA EA EA EA 1000G CY SY EA EA 4670 0.48 110 1.5 934 7.5 460 1 13.3 88 1890 7.35 520 23.9 400 24 220 1 235 13 400 3 2650 5.85 140 7.2 140 30.5 20 22.5 200 4.2 4 660 1 165 3 140 6 300 133 10 185 11.28 2050 1.76 3 77 14 33 2,241.60 165 7,005.00 460 1,170.40 13,891.50 12,428.00 9,600.00 220 3,055.00 1,200.00 15,502.50 1,008.00 4,270.00 450 840 2,640.00 165 420 1,800.00 1,330.00 2,086.80 3,608.00 231 462 26 CLASS 5 GRADATION 27 CLASS 5 PROCTOR 28 CLASS 5 DENSITY - INPLACE 29 BITUMINOUS EXTRACTION 30 BITUMINOUS GRADATION 31 BITUMINOUS AIR VOIDS 32 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY 33 CONCRETE AIR ENTRAINMENT 34 CONCRETE SLUMP TEST 35 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (SET OF 3) SCREDTJT R 3.0 STREET CONSTRICTION 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 3 MILL EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE SY 4 SUBGRADE CORRECTION SY 5 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDSTA 6 2331 TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 7 CONC. CURB & GUTTER, B-618 LF 8 ADJUST EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE EA 9 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING EA 10 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 1000E 158006LB.XLS EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 7TH AVENUE SOUTH & 8TH AVENUE SOUTH MILL & OVERLAY: PAGE 2 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 55 77 33 55 55 110 38.5 55 55 121 55 77 132 220 220 440 154 220 220 484 T SCHEDULE 1.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 88,471.80 SCHEDULE 2.0 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR 1 REPAIR EXIST. 8" VCP SAN. SEWER LF 290 26.4 7,656.00 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE EA 5 110 550 3 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL TN 80 17.6 1,408.00 4 REM. & REP. EXISTING SAN. SEWER SERV. LF 160 13.2 2,112.00 5 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA 16 33 528 T SCHEDULE 2.0 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR -TOTAL 12,254.00 720 0.48 345.6 400 1.5 600 7370 0.48 3,537.60 740 1 740 19.4 88 1,707.20 910 24 21,840.00 400 7.2 2,880.00 6 140 840 5 300 1,500.00 194 10 1,940.00 11 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) 12 BOULEVARD SODDING 13 SUBGRADE PROCTOR 14 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE 15 BITUMINOUS EXTRACTION 16 BITUMINOUS GRADATION 17 BITUMINOUS AIR VOIDS 18 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY 19 CONCRETE AIR ENTRAINMENT 20 CONCRETE SLUMP TEST 21 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (SET OF 3) CY SY EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA T SCHEDULE 3.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 38,005.10 SCHEDUL 4 0 SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1 F & I NEENAH R -1733 CASTING EA 1 275 275 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE EA 2 110 220 3 8" PVC, SDR 35, 0 -8 DEEP LF 100 16.5 1,650.00 4 8" PVC, SDR35, 8-10' DEEP LF 64 18.7 1,196.80 5 INSIDE DROP CONNECTION EA 1 220 220 6 INSIDE DROP EXTRA DEPTH, > 2' VF 3.4 55 187 7 INSULATION SF 500 2.2 1,100.00 8 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL TN 50 17,6 880 9 SUBGRADE PROCTOR EA 1 77 77 10 SUBGRADE DENSITY, INPLACE EA 4 33 132 SCHEDULE 4.0 SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 5,937.80 7771 AVENUE SOUTH & 8TH AVENUE SOUTH RECONSTRUCTION: SCHEDULE 5 0 STREET CONSTRUCTION 1 CLEARING (4" - 24" DIAMETER) EA 2 GRUBBING (4" - 24" DIAMETER) EA 3 REMOVE & RELOCATE 2" DIA. TREES EA 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 158006LB.XLS PAGE 3 20 160 3 10 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 6 6 6 4900 11.28 1.76 77 33 55 55 110 38.5 55 55 121 225.6 281.6 231 330 165 165 330 115.5 55 55 121 110 660 55 330 200 1,200.00 0.48 2,352.00 5 REMOVE CONC. CURB & GUTTER LF 6 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 7 SUBGRADE CORRECTION SY 8 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDSTA 9 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 10 2331 TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 11 2331 TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 12 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 13 BIT. D/W RESTORATION (2" THICK) SY 14 CONC. CURB & GUTTER, B-618 LF 15 CONC. D/W RESTORATION (6" THICK) SY 16 CONCRETE SIDEWALK RESTORATION SY 17 CONCRETE D/W APRON (6" THICK) SY 18 ADJUST EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE EA 19 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING EA 20 RECONSTRUCT EXISTING MANHOLE EA 21 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 1000G 22 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY 23 BOULEVARD SODDING SY 24 SUBGRADE PROCTOR EA 25 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA 26 CLASS 5 GRADATION EA 27 CLASS 5 PROCTOR EA 28 CLASS 5 DENSITY - INPLACE EA 29 BITUMINOUS EXTRACTION EA 30 BITUMINOUS GRADATION EA 31 BITUMINOUS AIR VOIDS EA 32 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY EA 33 CONCRETE AIR ENTRAINMENT EA 34 CONCRETE SLUMP TEST EA 35 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (SET OF 3) EA SCHEDULE 5.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 158006LB.XLS PAGE 4 2240 1.5 3,360.00 1428 7.5 10,710.00 490 1 490 12.6 88 1,108.80 2200 7.35 16,170.00 600 23.9 14,340.00 465 24 11,160.00 280 1 280 70 13 910 2580 6.4 16,512.00 50 30.5 1,525.00 64 22.5 1,440.00 180 30.5 5,490.00 3 140 420 10 300 3,000.00 4 650 2,600.00 126 20 2,520.00 170 11.28 1,917.60 1970 1.76 3,467.20 3 77 231 2 33 66 2 55 110 1 77 77 4 33 132 4 55 220 4 55 220 4 110 440 4 38.5 154 5 55 275 5 55 275 5 121 605 104,767.60 SCHED II.F. 6.0 ANITARY SE R EPAIR 1 REPAIR EXIST. 8" VCP SANITARY SEWER 2 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE 3 REM. & REPL. EXIST. SAN. SEWER SERV. 4 INSULATION 5 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL 6 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE LF EA LF SF TN EA T SCHEDULE 6.0 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR -TOTAL 15,555.00 SCRRDTII,E 7.0 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 2 1,100.00 2,200.00 2 REMOVE EXISTING 4" WATERMAIN LF 665 5.5 3,657.50 3 REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE EA 2 110 220 4 REMOVE EXISTING SERVICE PIPE LF ' 530 3.3 1,749.00 5 REMOVE EXISTING CURB STOP EA 16 44 704 6 REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT WNALVE EA 1 220 220 7 RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT EA 1 880 880 8 6" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 LF 710 27.5 19,525.00 9 HYDRANT WNALVE EA 2 2,200.00 4,400.00 10 6" GATE VALVE EA 2 825 1,650.00 11 FITTINGS LBS 800 2 1,600.00 12 1" SERVICE CONNECTION EA 16 220 3,520.00 13 1" SERVICE PIPE LF 530 10 5,300.00 14 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL TN 190 17.6 3,344.00 15 DISINFECTION TESTING LS 1 385 385 16 SUBGRADE PROCTOR TEST EA 2 77 154 17 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA 12 33 396 T SCHEDULE 7.0 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS-TOTAL 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE 2 F & I NEENAH R- 3067 -V CASTING 3 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CL III 158006LB.XLS 205 41 8,405.00 2 110 220 340 13.2 4,488.00 400 2.2 880 70 17.6 1,232.00 10 33 330 1 1 6 550 330 27.5 49,904.50 550 330 165 4 2' x 3' CATCH BASIN WITH CASTING 5 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL TN 6 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA T SCHEDULE 8.0 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS -TOTAL SOUTH MEADOWS ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS: SCHEDULE 9 0 ALLEY CONSTRUCTION 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 710 0.48 340.8 2 MILL EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE SY 520 0.48 249.6 3 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 990 7.65 7,573.50 4 SUBGRADE CORRECTION SY 55 1 55 5 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDSTA 6.7 88 589.6 6 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) CY 990 12 11,880.00 7 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5 TN 310 7.35 2,278.50 8 2331, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 160 24 3,840.00 9 BIT. D/W RESTORATION (2" THICK) SY 80 30.5 2,440.00 10 CONC. D/W RESTORATION (6" THICK) SY 20 30.5 610 11 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 1120 1 1,120.00 12 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY 35 11.28 394.8 13 BOULEVARD SODDING SY 350 1.76 616 14 SEED MIXTURE NO. 600 AC 0.2 1,320.00 264 15 SUBGRADE PROCTOR EA 1 77 77 16 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA 10 33 330 17 CLASS 5 GRADATION EA 1 55 55 18 CLASS 5 PROCTOR EA 1 77 77 19 CLASS 5 DENSITY - INPLACE EA 2 33 66 20 BITUMINOUS EXTRACTION EA 2 55 110 21 BITUMINOUS GRADATION EA 2 55 110 22 BITUMINOUS AIR VOIDS EA 2 121 242 23 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY EA 2 38.5 77 SCHEDULE 9.0 ALLEY CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 158006LB.XLS PAGE 6 8 2 880 17.6 33 880 140.8 66 2,131.80 33,395.80 CITY PARK SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: SCHEDULE 10.0 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 600 0.48 288 2 MILL EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE SY 360 0.48 172.8 3 SUBGRADE CORRECTION SY 40 1 40 4 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDSTA 2 88 176 5 AGGREGATE BASE,CLASS 5 TN 300 7.35 2,205.00 6 2331, TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 90 23.9 2,151.00 7 2331, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 115 24 2,760.00 8 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 60 1 60 9 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 780 1 780 10 REMOVE/REINSTALL EXIST. CAR STOPS EA 38 50 1,900.00 11 PAVEMENT STRIPING, 4" EQUIV. WIDTH LF 700 0.18 126 12 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY 20 11.28 225.6 13 BOULEVARD SODDING SY 100 1.76 176 14 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA 5 33 165 15 CLASS 5 GRADATION EA 1 55 55 16 CLASS 5 PROCTOR EA 1 77 77 17 CLASS 5 DENSITY - INPLACE EA 3 33 99 18 BITUMINOUS EXTRACTION EA 2 55 110 19 BITUMINOUS GRADATION EA 2 55 110 20 BITUMINOUS AIR VOIDS EA 2 121 242 21 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY EA 2 38.5 77 T SCHEDULE 10.0 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS - TOTAL 8T11 STREET SOUTH RECONSTRUCTION.• $CHF.DU!Y.11 0 STREET CONSTRUCTION 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 2 COMMON EXCAVATION 3 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 4 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 5 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV) SY CY CY RDSTA CY 158006LB.XLS PAGE 7 2450 400 3260 7.8 3260 11,995.40 0.48 1,176.00 7.5 3,000.00 7.65 24,939.00 88 686.4 12 39,120.00 6 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5 TN 7 2331 TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 8 2331 TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 9 BIT. MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 10 CONC. CURB & GUTTER, B -618 LF 11 CONC. D/W RESTORATION (6" THICK) SY 12 CONC. D/W APRON (6" THICK) SY 13 ADJUST EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE EA 14 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING EA 15 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SY 16 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL 1000G 17 PERFORATED 4" DIAMETER DRAINTILE LF 18 SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) CY 19 BOULEVARD SODDING SY 20 SUBGRADE DENSITY - INPLACE EA 21 CLASS 5 GRADATION EA 22 CLASS 5 PROCTOR EA 23 CLASS 5 DENSITY - INPLACE EA 24 BITUMINOUS EXTRACTION EA 25 BITUMINOUS GRADATION EA 26 BITUMINOUS AIR VOIDS EA 27 BITUMINOUS CORE DENSITY EA 28 CONCRETE AIR ENTRAINMENT EA 29 CONCRETE SLUMP TEST EA 30 CONCRETE CYLINDERS (SET OF 3) EA T SCHEDULE 11.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL SCHEDUT F 17, 0 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 1 REMOVE 18" CMP CULVERT 2 15" RCP STORM SEWER, CL III 3 18" RCP STORM SEWER, CL III 4 24" RCP STORM SEWER, CL III 5 30" RCP STORM SEWER, CL III 6 2' x 3' CATCH BASIN W /CASTING LF LF LF LF LF EA 1180 7.35 8,673.00 300 23.9 7,170.00 250 24 6,000.00 124 1 124 1520 6.4 9,728.00 70 30.5 2,135.00 30 33 990 4 140 560 1 300 300 3300 1 3,300.00 80 10 800 1500 7 10,500.00 100 11.28 1,128.00 1150 1.76 2,024.00 8 33 264 1 55 55 1 77 77 3 33 99 2 55 110 2 55 110 2 110 220 2 38.5 77 3 55 165 3 55 165 3 121 363 158006LB.XLS PAGE 8 124,058.40 250 5.5 1375.00 224 24.2 5,420.80 364 27 9,828.00 353 35.2 12,425.60 85 52 4,420.00 5 880 4,400.00 7 48" DIAMETER STD. Mil (0-8' DEEP) EA 9 72" DIAMETER MANHOLE (0-8' DEEP) EA 8 72" DIAMETER Mil EXTRA DEPTH ( >8') VF 10 18" RC APRON W/TRASH GUARD EA 11 30" RC APRON W/TRASH GUARD EA 12 RIP RAP, CLASS III CY 13 WOOD FIBER BLANKET SY 14 DITCH GRADING CY 15 CB SEDIMENT BARRIER DURING CONST. EA 16 SEEDING, MIXTURE NO. 600 AC 17 GRANULAR FOUNDATION MATERIAL TN 18 SUBGRADE PROCTOR EA 19 SUBGRADE DENSITY, INPLACE EA 7 1,155.00 8,085.00 1 2,640.00 2,640.00 0.74 330 244.2 4 880 3,520.00 3 1,540.00 4,620.00 36 44 1,584.00 600 2.75 1,650.00 1100 7.5 8,250.00 13 300 3,900.00 0.25 1,320.00 330 450 17.6 7,920.00 2 77 154 8 33 264 SCHEDULE 12.0 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 81,030.60 MISCELLANEOUS WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT SCHEDMR,E 13 0 WATERMA IN REPLACEMENT 1 REM. & REPL. EXISTING CURB BOX EA 18 165 2,970.00 2 REM. & REPL. EXIST. WM SERVICE PIPE LF 500 10 5,000.00 3 REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN VALVE EA 4 110 440 4 6" GATE VALVE EA 6 825 4,950.00 5 SUBGRADE DENSITY, INPLACE EA 14 33 462 T SCHEDULE 13.0 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT -TOTAL 13,822.00 158006LB.XLS PAGE 9 BID SUMMARY SWEET BRIAR LAKE & BURNES DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 1.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL SCHEDULE 2.0 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR -TOTAL 7TH AVENUE SOUTH & 8TH AVENUE SOUTH MILL & OVERLAY SCHEDULE 3.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL SCHEDULE 4.0 SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 7TH AVENUE SOUTH & 8TH AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 5.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 104,767.60 SCHEDULE 6.0 SANITARY SEWER REPAIR -TOTAL 15,555.00 SCHEDULE 7.0 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS -TOTAL 49,904.50 SCHEDULE 8.0 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS -TOTAL 2,131.80 SOUTH MEADOWS ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE 9.0 ALLEY CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 33,395.80 CITY PARK SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS SCHEDULE 10.0 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS -TOTAL 11,995.40 8TH STREET SOUTH RECONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 11.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 124,058.40 SCHEDULE 12.0 STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION -TOTAL 81,030.60 MISCELLANEOUS WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE 13.0 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT -TOTAL 13,822.00 TOTAL BID AMOUNT 158006LB.XLS PAGE 10 88,471.80 12,254.00 38,005.10 5,937.80 581,329.80 Construction bid Pavement control joint Total Subtotal Estimated Project Costs Revised April 11, 1996 Street Reconstruction Proiect 95 -16 (70% Resident /30% City) $ 88,471.80 (1,200.00) 87,271.80 Construction contingency @ 5% 4,363.59 Engineering @ 15% of engineering total 15,717.75 Legal /Admin. @ 7% of const. 5,876.46 $113,229.60 70% share assessed $ 79,255.17 30% City share $ 33,974.43 Street Reconstruction Proiect 95 -17 (70% Resident /30% City) Construction bid $104,767.60 Construction contingency @ 5% 5,238.38 Engineering @ 18$ of engineering total 18,861.30 Legal /Admin. @ 7% of const. 7,314.45 Total $136,181.73 70% share assessed $ 95,327.17 30% City share $ 40,854.56 South Meadows Alley Proiect 95 -17A (80% Resident /20% City) Const. bid $ 33,395.80 Engineering @ 6% of total engineering 5,496.64 Total $ 38,892.44 80% share assessed $ 31,113.95 20% City share $ 7,778.49 Bid Summary % of Total Contract Element Cost Contract *Burnes & Sweet Briar Reconstruction $ 88,471.80 15% *7th /8th Ave. So. Reconstruction 104,767.60 18% *South Meadows Alley 33,395.80 6% 7th /8th Ave. So. Overlay 38,005.10 6% Sanitary Sewer Repair 33,746.80 6% Water Main Improvements 63,726.50 11% Storm Sewer Improvements 83,162.40 14% City Park (parking lot) 11,995.40 2% 8th Street South Reconstruction 124,058.40 21% Total *Contract elements to be assessed Enaineerina Costs Feasibility $ 9,203.00 Design 37,574.00 Construction 50,660.00 Public Information 2,348.00 5% contingency 5,000.00 Total $104,785.00 $581,329.80 100% O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 U7 In U) U) U) U) U) 0 U) U) U5 U5 U) U) U) U) U) CO U) n n n n n h n n n n n n n n n N N N N r r r r C d V U)1000 LO U) 0 M 000 U) U) U) 1000 U) 0 CO N N M CO N- C4 E T) y ' (00000000000000000 n OD n V M COnNU U) > N Ih 000000Con00000000rNOn466oi6n ,_, Dnnnnnmm�nnnnn Q • E .. « o 0 0 0 o o O r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M o n 0 0 V O M O O V C d y OD 000000t` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 COOOnnNOM 6 O 0 to CO U) U) U) U) U) U) 0 0o U) U) U) U) U) U1 U) V 0 0 0 0 0 N M U) M O E C ; 0 +-' - O n n n n n n 0 0 n n n n n n n V 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 tl 0 N 0 0 N _ � ° r r r r rrr r N N Wa 0o V V N V V V C0M V NC V V V N rnC00000ODM1000 ONNNN V NNNN N NN V U) NT CO CD V V rU) CO O : w M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N V M M M N N CO U) V U) 0)1 !c O O O O O O O 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OO O O O O 6 00 o g m a •o a ✓ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N n CD CO r n CO O U) n V V V 7Zi V ;C.C. V V V V V M N M U) M n M M M N V V V V T N CD U) n U1 to T T r s _F" MNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN V OMMMNNM V V V 64El9Ef}SS69- E9E4E9- Ff d9Creee69E96949EAb9EAEREf .6969 - Ae t 0 c)0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N c4-c4 N N N N N N N_N.N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M CO M M M M M M M M CO M CO M M M M EA ER Ef} EA tf} EH fA Efl 69 03 fR EA E9 CID Ef} fA EAT 69 fR fA ff} 69 fA Eft ER fA CA- 4 O O O O O O O M O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 U) U) CO N N CO 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 n V M CO n 0 0 0 ! IC U) 0 U) U) U5 O U) n tO U) U) U5 U 6 n V 66u)un0 O n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n N r r 0 CO n O N N N r r r r r r r r r r-- n n ° r- CO m a C o m a C oo O o o ma n o0 0 00 0 0 o)� 1 n r 1.i I ic co o cCOc C oc C oM 0) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 00000000000000000000000000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn T r r r T r r r r r T r ..... r r ....... r 444444444444444444444444444 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C • C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C M C C O M M C C C U M M W M C O M C C O M --1-1-1-1-1-4-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1--1-1-10) O) O) 0 0 0 0) N 0) 0 CI) 0) C m N CII CD C5 C Q) Q) m C6 CC) CC) CC) m . > > > > t > > > > / C 6. L >_ L L L L L L L >_ L C L L t_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mwwwwww 00 N N N N N N CU 0 0 CI) CU CD l CD CD C D CD CU lU 0 C D CD CD 0 CU CD CD 0 0 0 C C C C C C C C C C U N N N N N U U N N CU lU N 0 N 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 == 7= 7 CO COCOcn C U cgU)COCOcnCOCO V MNCOO V ODNMMnr100Mnr0 V COODONrM M M M M CM M M CM M M CM M M M M M O M M M M M CM M C M M O M r NCMV'U)CDI.00MOrNM V W WN.WMOrNM Vtp COh r r r r. ...... N N N N N N N N 0 (4) M, (8) (5) 4 2 al 4 16 15 - 1 2 3 (57) 2 S RN 2 4 5 6 7 2 5 1 6 7 1- •�: 3 Met 2 41.11. 6 :I: 7 8 (58) 83 6 RECONSTRUCTION 5 ROAD 11 7 10 I XHOoOT A 24 23 ( 22 8 21 COMIC MODE HPO1:47.5 x1 .. :... .... .:: 1 2 3 = h- 4 l0 ST H`4 NO, 7 2 4 BaS ROAD CITY OF HOPKINS 1996 RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS LOCATION MAP 0 200 • Address of Assessed Parcel What assessment does this concern Property Identification Number: Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? (_) Yes (" ) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of �� permanent disability) b. (V) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. () Cancellation of assessment d. () Revision of assessment Reason for the request: ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 9S j2. * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. (print name) r 1/944 III; 1r re✓ci G.0 / J � �o (signature) (date) '3a 6 b,1.Pr ±` e_4/ c2 2--)t, (address of property owner) j (6J ) 7.8.2_ 0671.5 telephone Zip 5:5 4Z 3 Application For Deferral of Special Assessment I hereby make application for deferral of special assessment this 9th day of April , 1996 for the following assessment: Project 95 - 16 Street Improvement Project I understand that this deferral can only be granted if my annual income does not exceed the sum of $21,000 (subject to annual adjustment by the Consumer Price Index), that I am 65 years of age or older, or that I am permanently or totally disabled (regardless of age). I also understand that I must supply verification of my income in the form of my latest Federal Income Tax form, or written income verification from the Social Security Agency, or a copy of my last Social Security check. In the case of disability I must submit verification in. the form of a physicians statement In all cases verification must be submitted at least before the closing of the assessment hearing. - Furthermore, I understand that the deferment period is limited to 10 years, that I must renew the deferment annually no later that September 30 of each year, and that deferred assessments accrue simple interest during the deferment period .at a rate. established for payment of assessments at the time the assessment.roll•was adopted. [1; (dre,d. L.(1 i e. :�j.�C�,�r.� G � (print name)b (signature) (address of property owner) �_.l�✓fA/ 07.,/ CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA SuWribed and .sworn to before me this day of _ 19 Y Council Action: Notary Public Deferral granted Deferral denied Date: (64R) telephone Zip 4Z o TERRY G. OBERMAIER NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA', 'HENNEPIN COUNTY _ etl, m91;1000.` ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. oti -I(„ Address of Assessed Parcel 3. 13urit,eS "Dr i vim, • . What assessment does this concern Rer.oe.i -61 rue- Property Identification Number: - _t_LL - L sz a i Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? (y.1) Yes ( No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .( ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. ( ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (I) Cancellation of assessment d. ( Revision of assessment Reason for the request: , c, / S ye.4 r © +her- 6f r ee+S ' r .i t4r,phel acid ;+:00i1_ /vo A-14 f l en •eaN Ca A44 h [ 'eN d0NQ- 0 '-' et &fr p:nh4ji l y An N@cJ4 0.d /01 "de pia re, /V •Jot'�ce O N pr,11 U * You will need to fill out apeciai form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. D•r FAL<e. (print name) ; $31 Piva-A,''S 1)r. (address of property owner) 9/1 s /s�. (signature) (date) ((atL ) 3S - telephone ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 9 5 -1 L Address of Assessed Parcel 3 a 3 6ci r n e s 0 r v What assessment does this concern Property Identification Number: q _ f l - a- n to.) 41e e.e t ¢n 1Lit O O L 3 Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? (_) Yes (X) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one) - a .(_) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. (_) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (i) Cancellation of assessment d. (V) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: t Ju3t b cLc. cjht t h , b ha ir I ytQr x.90 ) 11- 9y 2 P i,Jt ha K nown, -I- an th i h :6 propo,sC uJ cs Or) 4 eira 0, board w._ i d or h d th :.,..5 00-:nc.r p'-° pay C r i t, -I- 6 t ot Bel l-A t. We. 1;v $ d * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. Nancy_ Ch4r /e (print name) Gird is (signature) y - - 96 (date) 30,3 23 r fl t Drive_ ( 4- ) 9 PP-0 4 yt ei (address of property owner) telephone Zip %.. C (.i r { J r) 9 o n 10+•h• t ue /V . co r ICye_Q e ha a 4-o pG_y p 4 n 4 t le +h G } We. use d • o r o n l c nemon + hs 2t a_ cc S e4 ' j 50O. Of n cW L&J _ + f +h ;s houses 1 Xp« - e Lk-S e_ i -+ ; r, g it 4o q Ocv`rlcr ! ;ve Il c re.. nc UJe r � pq ;d i^or Xpec_t (-4 .5 ±0 CouS h c+p ' t Port. c_.Jc m oJc ct +o pay cor c nac,J s re_ e ri e_ uJ� h (o be o to r CI r e_ 4 hom e.. rl . � $ in t ern cc re_ . 1 h e- 0 r 4 R b o ••- + $ b y e_ c. r s castrestrus 6 t i tS 10 c U. i s � 4 n e c.. 3 t r e_ e _ 1- d n" c&__3 y O ct I a, 3 . 1 'S. H o cA:r :.cnre-QS on 4b te_ • .1. * rvl4K e-S n'lt b erry t t r t1Je purcha.SEd Ono +ht h01-, he.rco. t r\ I{op K; rrS, G.Jc air P '43,00 ;r, rc p per +y i- aXcs o-1 ur <S f r e 2 4- n a e: d e d c re_ p / a c_ l n0 Oe ror c c. c._ 6c 4s h 1 h ;s h 0 Le sv._ . (.Jhy ct ° do ; t +n e, n 7 C.(0LI de.-- nn a d e i f Cc.c✓ r• t.7 to b 1 e m/ o u expe.nse., - -r - In :s e ex .J e S CL b i -I- -!- c r 4 Q S 'f c- I f nn. y ran O ca. + h. P µ+ yvu r3 ! F in n m y Shoes h oc d - t .- I the_ s 4"'I e . w a I do n+ Know Of r--nvOne. lA_Iho h�-g' Oou j u st Ia 5 Y� rxro Lt. hd -fv -F t .0 .s h down +hct - L c; i e_ -f- i 1 he +- nuts -F be. ec s oiu + :o r� 7� t e r` r ea sona pe- op ie. rt nccncia(1 + h;S wo'- -td w ipe LA. .5 0 am"!', ASSESSMENT HEARING APPEAL FORM PROJECT NO. 95 Address of Assessed Parcel 3(5 Eun Drzi(c What assessment does this concern /994 Snzeer Ifrirsairgaeurs Property Identification Number: 2 4 -/ r ? 2 2 / 4 O n 9 5 Do you wish to address the City Council at the hearing? (_) Yes (X) No Please complete this form if you intend to appeal to the council to defer, revise or cancel your assessment. This form must be completed and filed with the City Clerk no later than the close of the City Council assessment hearing. Your request will become part of the public hearing record. I request that the City Council consider (check one): a .(_ ) *Deferral of assessment (retired by virtue of permanent disability) b. (_ ) *Senior Citizen deferment (over 65 years of age) c. (_) Cancellation of assessment d. (X) Revision of assessment Reason for the request: T 4 yao.lFrr.T riEar is sr., troy Crot -STG c-er VrAi ii r TAW. Oiricata.rm,.1 of 4 Fbtnuc. n4Ar44s Ac4cscr Ai a rims ir.fr FA'rr»a. Fax Ar.asctricz rr nF,fiAaui4Lraanisr- is FLAW SD. 7 p/caJecr Was To Do lairs usucrg op 24A^ *C _4iJa ci sig.c • 7744ntaFncs LOT FRO,irACC • Couc SHOW.* 6G 0160 As tao,s. PtBA4 c see- A1TaGKGp G67TC2 FOR mote ov ray 4a4vm it * You will need to fill out a special form for deferral of assessment and provide the city verification of your income or disability. C1 u42D E. CL'pJ ) (print name) Sue/Jets DelVe (address of property owner) 7CoLis MA/ 03 a /99G. (da (/a /Z ) 9Stt3 -4.8 19 telephone Zip SS5 3 • 0 Attention: City Council Members Subject: Revision of Assessment City of Hopkins 1010 First Street South Hopkins MN 55343 Ref: (1) Project 95 -16 (2) Proposed Assessment Roll (3) Mr. Gessele's letter of April 22, 1996 (4) Assessment Hearing Appeal Form (Attached) The purpose of this letter is to provide more detail regarding my reasons for Request for Revision of Assessment stated briefly on the attached Appeal Form. Fundamentally ,it is my opinion that, using acreage as the determining factor for modification of actual front footage for calculation of assessment amount is not valid. My reasons are as follows: (1) Benefits accrue to a property owner with any street improvement solely because of front footage, not because of the size of their yard. Quite simply, it has to do with length of road bed and length of curb. I would presume that most , if not all, projects of this type use front footage or, secondarily, number of property owners as criterion for setting assessment amounts. Using acreage should be reserved for ascertainment of total property value and consequently total real estate taxes. To use it for street improvements would appear to be an anomaly and quite inequitable. (2) This method results in diminishment of (assessable) front footage for a number of property owners and thus a subsidizing of a portion of their assessment by owners having less front footage. The argument was presented to me that using a method other than acreage would not be "fair" to the owners having smaller lots. This carries with it an assumption that the size of an owners lot is somehow linked to his ability to pay his share. Obviously, this premise is totally without merit. (3) In the case of my property, there are ten owners on the Proposed Assessment Roll having anywhere between 15% to 44% more Front Footage than I do and their proposed assessments are 22% to 39% less than my proposed assessment. One owner has 159% more frontage than I do and we both have the same proposed assessment. One can only conclude that the using acreage as the criterion has serious inequities. (4) In view of the above, I am urging that the City Council authorize recalculating the Assessment Roll using actual Lot Front Footage as Assessable Footage. If this is done, 14 owners would remain the same; 5 would increase; and 8 would decrease. One of those increasing would be a "double lot" having a 220.54 Front Footage which will show a significant increase. Directly across the street, roughly the same size parcel is divided into two lots and consequently two assessments that would be roughly equal to the new calculation for the "double lot ". This lot is a special case and was obviously being subsidized under the acreage formula. If this owner is to subsidized, the city should do it; not the property owners. Thank you for your consideration of this appeal. Pik) .24 -in-22 14 oo' 3/S Burwas 2>c.,or Edward Glynn CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 96 -35 ADOPTION OF THE ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 95 -16 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as, required by law, the City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the reconstruction of streets and installation of utilities on Burnes Drive and Sweet Briar Lane as described in the files of the City Clerk as Project 95 -16, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, as may be amended and a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the first of the installments to be payable on or after the first Monday in January, 1997, and shall bear interest at the rate of 8 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from May 7, 1996 until December 31, 1997. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest from one year on all unpaid installments. 3. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council to reimburse itself in the future for the portion of the cost of this improvement paid for from municipal funds by levying additional assessments, on notice and hearing as provided for the assessments herein made, upon any properties abutting on the improvement but not made, upon any properties abutting the improvement but not herein assessed for the improvement, when changed conditions relating to such properties make such assessment feasible. 4. To the extent that this improvement benefits non - abutting properties which may be served by the improvement when one or more later extensions or ATTEST: improvements are made, but which are not herein assessed, therefore, it is hereby declared to be the intention of the Council, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 420.051, to reimburse the city by adding any portion of the cost so paid to the assessments levied for any of such later extension or improvements. 5. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of the assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins this 7th day of May, 1996. James A. Genellie, City Clerk BY Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor