Loading...
CR 96-125 Feasibility Report 1st St N ImprovementsAugust 1, 1996 Proposed Action. Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council adopt Resolution No. 96 -64 ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report - 1s Street North Improvements and authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Bolton and Menk, Inc. for preparation of Feasibility Report. This action is the first step in the process of improving 1s Street North from 5th Avenue to 17 Avenue. The city has not received a petition to improve this street. Overview. This busy street has been scheduled for improvement for many years. The original schedule called for reconstruction in 1990 -92. However, Mainstreet reconstruction delayed this project. A seal coat was applied in 1993 but several areas of the street are now rapidly deteriorating. Primary Issues to Consider • Why order a feasibility report? • How was Bolton and Menk selected? • Preliminary design concept • Project budget • Proposed project schedule Supporting Information. • Proposed Resolution 6 -64 • BR1tpn and Menlr. jgrop� sal ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT 1 STREET NORTH IMPROVEMENTS Steven I Stadler, Director of Public Works Council Report 96 -125 WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 96 -64 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE 1ST STREET NORTH IMPROVEMENTS 1st Street North from 5th Avenue to 17th Avenue is in need of rehabilitation; and City staff. is requesting that this Municipal State Aid street be upgraded under the current assessment policy even though no petition for the upgrade has been submitted; and the first step in the assessment procedure is the ordering of a feasibility report. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, that the proposed improvements be referred to the Public Works Director for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, this 6th day of August 1996. ATTEST: James A Genellie, City Clerk BY Charles D. Redepenning, Mayor 1 Council Report 96 -125 Page 2 Analysis of Issues • Why order a feasibility report? Preparing a feasibility report is a mandatory procedure that a city must comply with in the assessment process. In this case, the feasibility report would serve to meet this requirement and it would also provide Council with detailed information to help determine whether the project should proceed past the feasibility report stage. The report will provide a proposed street layout, an opinion of probable costs, funding sources, a preliminary assessment roll and other information. • How was Bolton and Menk, Inc. selected? Staff received letter proposals from three engineering consultant fines - Bolton and Menk, Inc., MSA Consulting Engineers, and OSM & Associates, Inc. Stuff reviewed each proposal including: project team members, past city street project experience, and understanding of project needs. Staff believes Bolton and Menk, Inc. (BMI) is best suited to this project. The city has had good experience with BMI on both residential projects (Oakridge South Improvements) and a Municipal State Aid project (T.H. 7 North Frontage Road at 12 Avenue) This project encompasses both of these elements. • Preliminary Design Concept The preliminary plan is to reconstruct three blocks of 1s Street North, from 10 Avenue to 12 Avenue and from 14 to 15 Avenues. These areas have deteriorated to the point that reconstruction is required and the measured subgrade strengths are low. The other blocks, with the exception of the 600 block, will benefit sufficiently from an asphalt overlay. The 600 block was reconstructed just a few years ago and is in excellent condition. The existing street is predominantly 30 feet wide with the exception of from 7th to 10 Avenues where it's 36 feet wide. The plan is to widen to 36' from 10 to 11 Avenue and to 32 feet from 11` to 12 Avenue. The feasibility study will investigate widening the other blocks to 32 feet to allow the city the Council Report 96 -125 Page 3 option of allowing parking on one side of the street. This would involve milling the existing asphalt and removing and replacing the existing curb. The project will include 6' wide concrete sidewalks on both sides of the street. Currently, sidewalks are located sporadically throughout the corridor. Pedestrian paths are worn into the grass boulevard in several areas. For the most part, there is ample room for sidewalk as long as the street isn't widened beyond 32 feet. • Project budget The draft 1997 -2001 CIP currently shows the project with an estimated cost of $220,000. This could increase to $290,000 if existing curb were replaced in order to widen the street to 32 feet. The project would be paid for through Municipal State Aid funds and special assessment. • Proposed project schedule August 8: September 17: October 15: November: Jan 21, 1997: February 13: February 18: March 18: April 15: May - June: August - Sept: Initial public information meeting on proposed CIP 1997 street improvements Accept feasibility study and order public hearing Public Hearing & authorize final plans Public Input meeting Complete plans, approve plans, order bids Open Bids Order Assessment Hearing Assessment Hearing and adopt assessment roll Award bid Start construction Complete construction MANKATO, MN BOL.TCor M_NK, iNC_ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors July 26, 1996 Mr. Steve Stadler Public Works Director 1010 1st. Street Hopkins, MN 55343 -7573 RE: City Project No. ST -8 Reconstruction of First Street North Hopkins, Minnesota Dear Mr. Stadler: 1515 East Highway 13 • Burnsville, MN 55337 -6857 Phone (612) 890 -0509 • FAX (612) 890 -8065 We are pleased to submit the following proposal for the Reconstruction of First Street North Feasibility Study, City Project No. ST -8, . The proposed improvement is described as follows: 1. Mill and overlay the following street sections: ✓ 5th Ave. to 10th Ave; ✓ 12th Ave. to 14th Ave; and ✓ 15th Ave. to 17th Ave. 2. Reconstruct the following street sections: ✓ 10th Ave. to 11th Ave: 11.0 m (36') width; ✓ 11th Ave to 12th Ave: 9.6 m (32') width; and ✓ 14th Ave. to 15 Ave: 9.6 m (32') width. In accordance with the CIP plan, this project will use Municipal State Aid funds and Special Assessment funds to finance the $217,500 estimated construction costs. In keeping with MnDOT Technical Memorandum No. 94 -35 ES -07, dated October 4, 1994, the Feasibility Study will be completed in metric units. The tasks, listed below, follow the format you outlined at our meeting on July 16, 1996: Task 1: Project Meeting This task will include a meeting with you and city staff to review the project scope and gain a better understanding of the issues involved for this project. FAIRMONT, MN 1 SLEEPY EYE, MN BURNSVILLE, MN AMES, IA LIBERTY, MO An Equal Opportunity Employer Task 2: Data Collection This task will include collecting existing data (furnished by the City) relating to the project and adjacent areas. This would include sanitary sewer tapes, boundary surveys, topographic surveys, soil surveys, utility maps and as builts, parking lot lighting plans, traffic studies, aerial photos and all other pertinent information as it may relate to the proposed improvements. Task 3: Watermain and Sanitary Sewer This task will include a discussion with City staff of the condition of the existing underlying watermain and sanitary sewer. A review of the utility maps indicate that the water and sanitary sewer mains run perpendicular to the proposed project centerline along the intersecting avenues and may have minimal impact to the project. As indicated by the Sanitary Master Plan, a section of the sewer collector system running along 1 lth Avenue, through the intersection of 1st Street North, is indicated as an area of future improvement. Discussions with City staff will determine whether any segment of the existing watermain and /or sanitary sewer systems needs to be upgraded, replaced or extended at this time; or, as in the case of the 11th Avenue sanitary sewer, may be postponed for a future project. Task 4: Storm Sewer Capacity This task will include a review of the existing storm sewer system to meet the 5 -year minimum design criteria for MnDOT State Aid projects (based upon revised storm sewer design criteria, March 22, 1996). The existing system lies mainly at the intersections and runs perpendicular with the proposed project centerline. The analysis will include the catchbasin leads, that part of the system within the 1st Street right -of -way and the leg of pipe immediately down stream. It is anticipated that city staff would provide existing drainage areas upstream of the proposed improvement. Task 5: Intersection Evaluation This task will include review of the pavement condition at each intersection and make recommendations as to whether reconstruction, overlay or do nothing is appropriate at this time. Issues to take into account include the pavement condition, location of the intersection with the proposed reconstruction segments of the project, condition of the underlying utilities and future improvements planned for the intersecting avenues. Task 6: Street Layout This task will include developing a layout of the proposed street for those sections scheduled for reconstruction. This includes impacts to existing trees and roadway geometries Also included here will be a review of the sidewalk layout and boulevard impacts. The layout will be based on existing plans (as- builts, etc.) and available aerial photos. Field topography however, is the preferred data base for this task, and is recommended. BMI can provide an estimated cost for this service if existing data is not available to complete this task. Task 7: Review Meeting This task will include a meeting with City staff to review the results of tasks 3, 4, 5, and 6 and to review alternates. Task 8: Cost Estimate This task will include completing the Engineer's Opinion of Cost for the proposed improvements. Task 9: Right -of -way and Easement Requirements This task will review the right -of -way and easement requirements for the proposed improvements, if any. These limits need to be shown on State Aid construction plans in order to be eligible for State Aid reimbursements. Task 10: Permits This task will review the need for permits including MPCA and MDOH. Task 11: Project Schedule This task will establish a project schedule including the public input phase, design phase and the construction phase. Task 12• Financing and Assessments This task will identify the funding sources and complete a preliminary assessment roll based upon the City's assessment policy and the engineers opinion of probable costs. City staff will furnish the parcel numbers, owners and front footage for each of the adjacent parcels. 3 Task 13: Parking Lot Lighting This task will review the existing lighting system adjacent to the Maetzold Field parking lot between 12th Avenue and 14th Avenue. The purpose is to determine the feasibility of providing additional lighting to service the parking lot and to explore the possibilities of relocating the overhead line underground. Task 14: Existing Traffic Study This task will review the existing traffic study by Benshoof and Associates relating to the proposed turn lane on eastbound 1st Street North at 11th Avenue: Recommendations of the traffic report will be incorporated into the street geometric layout of Task 6. Task 15: Draft Report This task will complete a draft report including existing conditions, proposed improvements, costs and funding and exhibits and present it to City staff for review and discussions. Task 16: Final Report This task will complete the final report incorporating staff comments where appropriate. In addition, comments received from the neighborhood meeting will be addressed if appropriate. Task 17: Neighborhood Meeting and Public Hearing This task will include two (2) meetings including one neighborhood meeting to discuss the proposed improvements and one presentation of the feasibility report to the City Council. Bolton and Menk is proposing to complete the above tasks at our hourly rates in accordance with the attached 1996 Schedule of Fees with a not -to- exceed total cost of $7,900.00. Thank you for providing this opportunity to offer our services to you. We look forward to a favorable outcome and to working with you in the near future. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. J! Ronald A. Roetzel, P. . 4 i