CR 91-184 Repairs Elmo Park Water Treatment FacilityAugust 14, 1991
Proposed Action.
Y 0
A,
/Y c
P K \ 1 �6 , Council Report: 91-184
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
WITH REPAIRS OF THE ELMO PARK WATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
Staff recommends the following action "Move to authorize staff to
proceed with the roof and wall repairs of the Elmo Park Water
Treatment Facility in accordance with the attached reports from Ins-Dec
Inc. at an estimated cost of $90,000.00".
The adoption of the above motion would authorize staff to prepare the
plans and specifications for this project, publish bid advertisements
for this project,, and to use Water division funds as the funding
mechanism for the project.
Overview.
Earlier this year the Water and Sewer Superintendent noticed water
leaking through the roof at the Elmo Park Water Treatment Facility.
The leaks gradually got worse which prompted staff to have Inspec Inc.
look at the roof to determine the necessary repairs. As can be seen
by the attached reports from Inspec, the roofing material is basically
not worth repairing and Inspec is recommending complete replacement of
the roof membrane.
During Inspec-s review of the roofing material they noticed severe
wall deterioration at this facility. Staff. subsequently instructed
Inspec Inc. to study the walls and determine what repairs were
necessary. Inspec recommendation for the walls included repair's
that must be made ' in conjunction with the roof repairs, and other wall
repairs that should be completed within two years.
Primary Issues to Consider.
0 How does this project affect the fund balance of the Water
Utility Fund?
01 What is the timing of this project?
0 How would this project impact the city's water supply
capabilities?
0 Could this project be delayed?
Supporting Information.
0 Analysis of Issues
0 Inspec Inc. Reports
Le"u§faf`1-,6n, Plublic Works Director
Council Report: 91 -184
Page 2
Analysis of Issues.
o How does this project affect the fund balance of the Water
Utility Fund.?
The funding of this project with water revenue should not
significantly impact the water reserve fund at this time. It was
anticipated the these repairs would be necessary in the near
future and they were therefore included in the CIP as a part of a
complete filtration plant renovation in 1994 and 1995. The large
repairs in 1994 and 1995 would have probably necessitated an
increase in'water rates prior to commencing the projects in order
to provide proper funding. The funding of these roof and wall
repairs earlier than anticipated may create a need to review and
possibly raise our water rates earlier than anticipated.
o What is the timing of this project?
If the project was approved as recommended the sequence of events,
would be as follows:
1. Preparation of plans and specifications, advertisement of
bids and award of contract.
2. Complete all roof repairs and wall repairs to the aeration
tower this fall.
3. Install a vapor barrier on the inside walls.of the
filtration plant this winter during low usage periods. The
.vapor barrier must be installed during low humidity
conditions and as such the plant must be completely shut
down
4. Complete the remaining exterior wall repairs next spring.
It's necessary that the inside vapor barrier be installed to
eliminate moisture from traveling through the block work
prior to completing the remaining wall repairs.
o How would this project impact the city's water supply
capabilities?
As mentioned above, the city would have to completely shut down
the filtration plant for approximately 2 -3 weeks this winter
while the vapor barrier was being installed. The city's other
filtration plant on County Road 3 unfortunately does not have
enough capacity to meet the city's water demand even during low
usage periods. Staff has therefore been in contact with
Minnetonka to work out arrangements to open connections between
the two cities water systems in order to meet Hopkins water
demand for this period.
e w
. Council Report: 91 -184
Page 3
o Could this project be delayed?
The leaks in the roof area are presently not affecting any of our
filtration procedures. However, if leaks developed above our
filtration areas and dripped into the treated water, the city
would be forced to shut down the plant to prevent any
contamination from occurring. Staff therefore feels that it is
necessary to perform these repairs under a planned program
instead of under emergency situations.
Recommendation.
Staff strongly feels that Council authorize this project as proposed
in order that it may be completed under a planned approach instead of
possibly under emergency situations. There will be furthermore
significant cost savings by doing it as proposed instead of being at
the mercy of a contractor during an emergency situation.