CR 90-150 CSAH No. 3 Improvements
.
.
'.
1 Y
o
Consent Agenda
(;
.,..
July 11, 1990
o P K \ ';lo
Council Report; 90-150
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SIGNATURES
C.S.A.H. NO. 3 CORRIDOR IMPROVID1ENT
STUDY AGREEMENT
iZ~Q.Q~,Action.
st~ff recommends approval of the following motion: Move_to ado.pt
~tioD No-,- 90~8~~solutj,on gu.'f.hQrizing tllli Mayo~ alld ~
H~:OclCt~r. of Ho~ins to, sign a coopera.btve fl1nd1ng. agr.:eement ">lith
~~e~in County for qo~n~y Road 13 corridor imQrovernent ~tu~~~
Ove1-"_V .i~y .
The city Council at its last meeting agreed in principle to a
cooperati ve funding agreement with Hennepin County for a Phase II
corridor study or County Road #3. The final agreement has been drawn
up and examined by staff and the City Attorney.
~'l.
o Is the agreement acceptable to the City?
c
St.aff finds the agreement totally in keeping with terms as
agreed upon in meetings with Hennepin County officials. The
City Attorney has examined the document and finds it in order.
What is the C~unty!s participation in this study?
Hennepin County Agrees to reimburse the City 50% of the costs
incurred in this study up to a maximum of $15,000.
lu.p~timq -IfA:.o~t.Q1t!!.-
o Agreement No. PW 3B-02~90
o Resolution No. 90-81
~~
._~ -- r - ~ . ~
James Geaselei Eng neering
Supervisor
PiIlIW'~II~
.
.
;.
.:;~.' .. .,
~~..~~1\l!a r..ri!'!ilJt..~'<IIIIIIiII'"-'lII!f....,__ l1li
,.~ J!IIIiIi
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: 90-81
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR MlD CITY MANAGER
SIGNATURES TO C.S.A.H. NO, 3 CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENT STUDY AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the city Council at its :t'egular meeting of July 10,
1990, adopted i.n principle to enter into a
cooperative funding agreement with Hennepin County
for a County Road #3 corridor study between T.H.
1.69 and Blake Road, and
WHERF.AS, the final agreement, Agreement No. P~l 38-01-90, has
been received and reviewed by the City and found to
be in order.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city
of Hopkins, Minnesota:
The Mayor and the City Man&ger of Hopkins are
hereby designated and authorized to place their
signatures upon this cooperative agreement.
Nelson W. Berg, Mayor
ATTES:l~ :
James A. Genellie, City Clerk
~,
..
.
e.
_.."...c,."',....,,,'.'.>,:....,
- - ~ -.
'., ..~
-.':,'''', ,
;_--~ ',X -~.
':l.'"
I:',;::::.' "
~:i1..'+.",
'" -,~, :':' ~', J".
i".-- ,
.~:' "--
~~:{~::_!.;.,.:-,...;- .
;~~dE'
Agreement No. PW 38-01-90
County Project No. 9028
County state Aid Highway No, 3
City of Hopkins
County of Hennepin
AGReEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION
IN A CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT STUDY
A~REEMENT, Made and entered into this _ day of _, 19 ____. by
and between the County of Hennepin. a body politic and corporate under the laws of the
State of ~innesota1 hereinafter referred to as the .County" and the City of Hopkins, a
body politic and corporate under the laws of the state of Minnesota. hereinafter
referred to as the .City..
WITNESSETH:
WH~REAS, The County and the City have been negotiating to bring about the
improve~ent of that portion of County state Aid Highway No. 3 between TH 169 and CSAH
20 (Slake Road).
WHEREAS,The City has expressed its willingness to employ the services of
Consultant Engineers to study and develop a design proposal fer improvements to said
cQfridor;.and
WHI.tREAS~The County is agreeable to the use of Consultant Engineers for such
purpose's; ~nd
NOWTHFREFORE, IT IS HERESY AGREED:
WHEREAS, It is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto
under the provisions of M.S. SEC. 162.17, Subd. 1 and SEC. 471.59.
I
The City shall enter into a contract with the consultant engineering firm
Benshoof and Associetes, Inc. of Eden Prairie, Minnesots1 for the purpose of preparing
a CSAH 3 Corridor Stocty Report which will result in a concept layout for improveaents
to the corridor. The services to'be provided by the co~sultant shell be in accordance
with those ~utlined in a f4ay 11. 1990 letter from Benshoof and Associate~1 Inc. to Mr.
Ja~' Gesseie uf the City of Hopkins. A copy of said letter (marked Exhib1t .A~) is
attaChed hereto and by this reference made 8 part hereof,
-1-
d:~
-
- ~~
-
_.~~........
.
Agreement No. PW 38-01-90
II
The City shali enter into a separate contract with the engineering firm Schoell
and Madson, Inc. of Minnetonka, Minnesota for the purpose of preparing a corridor base
map and supplying same to the City's consultant, Benshoof and Associates, Inc. The
services to be provided by the engineering firm shall be in accordance with those
outlined in a May 25, 1990 letter from Schoell and Madson, Inc. to Mr. James Gessele
of the City of Hopkins. A copy of said letter (marked Exhibit HBR) is attached hereto
and by this reference made a part hereof.
III
The City shall be responsible to ensure that all work and services provided under this
agreement are in accordance with any and all applicable laws. regulations and
guidelines related to location, design, safety and environment.
IV
The City or its aaents shall be responsible for the collection of any and all data
~ required to co~plete said CSAH 3 Corridor study Report.
V
All plans. designs, reports and specifications prepared in accordance herewith shall
be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer or land
surveyor. as applicable, registered in the state of Minnesota, and said plans,
designs, reports and specifications shall be cartif1ed by him as required by law.
VI
The City or its agents shall confer with the County or its ag~nts as oftsn as is
necess~ry in ~eg~rd to the work to be completed in accordance with this agreement,
When requested by the County, the City or its agents shall also assist the County in
"oy conferenc~s with interested parties.
VII
At the request of the Cou~ty. the City or its agents shall furnish the County with any
~orking copies of sny plans. designs or reports at any time during the study process,
.~
,b,..
".' ':,..' .'
,".\
;~~
,."
""L~:i
VIII
:J
A:,
The County retains the right to review and comment on the preliminary plans.
':::'\~
,....
."
~..~n
~:...-.
:-~:",; '.
,;-,.:,'"
~2,-
~
,.......,',$
..:~..:.:..:~j!~:;~~
~WF:...
~u_~~
1.~,1~..~IiB'~~~~
~~.~l:
J,
jJI:I J It!.. L~JlIII...J.!I.1L!IIi IlIIlIIIIiIlIllif- ~
AK . . b..;.~.u'.~lli~~
.
Agreement No. PW 38-01-90
designs or reports of the City or its agents at any time. The City hereby agrees to
incorporate all comments offered by the County or its agents into the final documents
prepared under the terms of this agreement.
IX
The City shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work of its agents and
shall ensure that all necessary revisions Dr corrections resulting from errors and
omissions on the part of the City or its agents are promptly made without additional
compe~sation by the County. Acceptance of the work by the County shall in no way
rel1~ve the City or its agents of the responsibility for subsequent corrections of any
such errors or omissions and also the clarification of any ambiguities.
X
Upon completton of the corridor study, the City shall furnish the County with one
(1) copy of the corridor base Map and five (5) complete copies of the CSAH 3 Corridor
Study Report prepared by its agents.
..
XI
The County shall reimburse the City for a portion of the costs of the herein
agreed to corridor study. Said County reimbursement shall be fifty (50) percent of
the costs incurred by the City up to a maximum of Fifteen Thousand Dollars and No
Cents ($15~OOO.OO).
~};;.~:,:: .
-3~
~
The City may submit monthly invoices to the County for reimbursement. Said
invoices shall include a copy of any invoices subm'ftted to the City by its agents for
work perfcrmed in Iccordence with this agreement. The amount remitted to the City by
'the CQ~nty shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the amount invoiced'the City by its
agents.
In~oices will be checked by He~nepin county and payments will b~ Made in full,
without retB1nag~.
'i.
:.:-.",.-,-".
XIX
All records kept, by the City and the County with respect to this project shall be
subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto.
.;....'~.,:c:::_ .
.',~i:/:'_ __ .
~~~
_f1~IJ~~"""\I -"IT 'SYWll_i11 _r~~T ............-..----
.
Agreement No. PW 38-01-90
XIII
It is further agreed that each party to this agreement or their agents shell not
be responsible or liable to the other or to any other person whomsoever for any
claims, damages, actions, or causes of actions of any kind or character arising out of
or by reason t,r the performance of any work or part hereof by the other as provided
herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sale cost and expense any
action or proceedtng commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever
character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as
provided herein.
.
XIV
It is further agreed that any and ail employees of the City and all other persons
engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided
herein to be performed by the City or its agents shal1 not be considered emplay~es of
the County. and that any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Worker's
Compensation Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the state of Minnesota on
b9h~lf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third
parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so
engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered here1n shall in no way
be the obligation or responsibility of the County.
Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the
County 1n the performance of any work or services required nr provided for herein to
be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City or its
agents. and that any and all claims that mayor might arise under the Worketts
Co~pensaticn Act or the Unemployment Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on
behalf nf sai~ emp10yees ~hile so ~ngaged and any and all claims made 'by any third
parties as a con~eGuence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so
engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way
be the obligation ~r responsibility of the City or its agents.
-4-
~
XV
The provis1ons of M. S. 181.59 end of any applicable local ordinance rel@ting to
c;,v11 rights and d1scrim1nat1on and th, affirmative action policy statement of
Hennep1n County shall be considered 6 part of this agreement as though fully set forth
herein.
_,IIIlW ~__ '__ _.._-
.
Agreement No. PW 38-01~90
!N TESTIMONY WHEREOF, ihe parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed
by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above
wr1tteno
CliY OF HOPKINS
(Ssel)
By:
Mayor
Date:
And:
Manage r
Date:
.
ATTEST:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
By:
Clerk of the ~ounl:Y Board
Date:
Upon proper execution, this agr!~ment
W111C\.egel1Y v~lid and bind/in, g,
V\ I.
\ j~
8y: .. ....1:." ~
Assis n Coun y Attorne ~
Date: . ,-/0- Olt)
------="_____-L.:,,....,_~....
Approve~ &3 to eX0cut1ijn
".'."
,~
" "
~jl,_;..<^_. !.
~t: . .
ay~ '
ASsi stant-counli,t7ruc;rneyo -~~._~.
Date:
~~::?,\C';.',>
::..;"",;'." .
r~;'~-~';" .;
~~r~):,
By: ChEJ1 rman of 1 ts County Board
Date:
And:
Assocrate -County Administrator---
and CQunty Engineer
Date:
RtCOM~ENOtD FOR APPROVAL
By ~rremr;~oepert.menrofl5U6Tic WorkS
Date: .
~_F;l~U.....__ _--..
... --
.w
,-
--...,.""
BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CONSULTANTS
7901 Fl VING CLOUD DRIVE. SUITE 119/ EDEN PRAiRIE, MINNESOTA 553<< I (612)9<-4-7500 I FAX (612) 9<<-9322
.
,.,',.,'..'..
~.::~:.~_.~ .. .'
,';'"
..'
;.....~'
~S-.
~/
HaY 11. 1990
Hro Jame9 Gessele
CIty or Hopkfns
1010 First St. s.
HopkIns. MN 55343
RE: Propo~al For CSAH 3 Corridor Study
'Jaar dfm:
-- ....-
Thfg fs to present our proposal to prepare the CSAH 3
Corridor. Study Jofntly For the Cfty of HopkIns and Hennepin
County. The ~tudy locatfon (s CSAH 3 between T.H. 169 and
CSAH 20 (B 1 ske Road). The pr f nc f pa I pur'pose or the si:udy f!ll
to~ develop a.recommended concept layout for fmprovements
to the corr~dor which fs acceptable to both the City and
other t nvo 1 ved agenc f e$S and wh f ch COY f d be f mp J emented at
$Qn~'Future date aFter typfcsl engIneering Fessfbf.ftv
stud' es, det:a' , f ng cons-eruet f on des t 911 end cost:.:
Exhfbft A pres~lts the proposed Scope of Services. fneludlng
B: description or WOt"K Task51 5cheduJe~ and Cost Estfmste.
Key aspects or the Scope of Servfces 'ncludet
The ~O scale baze map wf?tbe prepared by others and
reproducfble$ provided to us.
The a 1 ternat f ve$ to be eve I uated (1::wo east or 'the
railroad trsck~ and three !n the vfcfnity or T.Hu 169)
aro based upon C:ty d!rectfon gafned r~ our' fnttfal
o've! use ion CJr the corr f dor f n November 1989..
..
?,;H. p~.k hour trsf'Ff c rori!!'cests wi I t be prepared 'or
the alt~rnatfves in t.he vicfnftv of T~H. 169 onJy.
The e.tfma~ed schedule For 3~rvlees wfl1 be twelve
weeks From retee f pt of th~ base 1'nI!!iP~ 'to deve I oprnent and
r~vl.w of prslfmlnary r~c~~ndetfons wfth project
,part:fcipants.
The estImated costs of our services are $23.000 wheeh
we would consider a maximum not to exceed unleS8 ..
:!Jpoclf're euthorf:zatfon were receIved.
.,"'-
,-_~:-I~.;
'r :.:./:~
.',-:;
Agreement No" PW 35-01-90 ' >~
Exh; hi t uA"; Sheet 1 of7...tW\;I!j
iIliiri~ I .L~AOIIW1l _~ ~iSIlIlIfl _~JIIIiIi~.I!ilE.LI M:._J.1 JJ!1IIIIv.: -l&, JI JL!lIl
llII
-'lllIIJ
'-WHtiIilllJiI BII'mlIiIIIi1~1IiI~~.i
.
Hr. vames Gessele
-2-
May 1 I, 1 990
As we understand It, the .Clty of Hopkfns wfll be the lead
agency and our contract wfll be with the CIty. Costs wflt
be fnvofced on en hourly bas's at the Following rates:
Prfnc1pal - $70.00, Professlona! - $50000, Technicfsn _
$35000, and Secretary $21.50. Dfrect expenses wfll be
bf ).fed at cost. Invoices wi i i be submitted monthly.
IF these arrangements are acceptable, plesse sign one copy
below and return to me. We Jook Forward to assIsting the
CIty and County on 'this project. '
Sf I1.cUe t y~
'BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATESf INC.
CITY OF HOPKINS
~? ,...-; ~""--,J
,~...../~7/v~
Mitch Won5on~ Prfncfpal
P-1Y
Name
1. "....___
Date
.
AtT4enment: Exhfbft A
-----------:
.
.w
, .
BENSHOOF & ASSOCiATES, 'NCe
TRANSPORTATION AND I__^,!,!D USE CONSULTANTS
790t FLYING CLOUD DRIVE, SUITE 119' EDEN PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA 55344/ (612) 947590 I FAX (612)94+9322
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR CSAH 3
CORRIDOR STUDY
WORK TASKS
1) ~~round~and Oata Col1ectfoD - ThIs task wIll 'nelude
the Following:
. A JoInt meetfng wfth stafFs of the Cfty, HennepIn
County, Mn/DOT. the Soo Lfne and Super Vaiu to apprise
them or the study and under~tand key iS3ues and
,_ ,.concerns
.
. Data collection includIng LRT projectfons, applfcable
de~tgn criterfa. base mapsJ future land use
proJections. existIng ~raFFfc volumes. and Forecests OT
Super Vaiu traFFfc (expected to be prepared by Super
Valu cOMsultants)
. Supptementsl trerrtc counts. It 19 expected that
counts at two locations south or CSAH 3 well be
required to assIst fn the traFFic Forecasts.
. Development of evaluatfon crfterfa and revIew wIth Cfty
and County s~aFF.
2J Joft'fai eveJust,f9o of Je-F-Fer5on Ave. (T .Ji<<_ j6~=t rBfftl:i)
Ra f' J road Cr,g3s f nQ - th f 5 task ents f I 5 eve i uet f on of the
reas;biltty or th'~ railroad cro9~'n9 ~a meet Super Vaiu
needs and provfde eFFectfve traFFic operettons tn the
ShOi"t term j n order to respOnd to the Super Va I u request.
It Is not expected that thE results of thi$ "short t~rmn
enaly~!~ wIll signfFfcantly ~Freet the necess8~ ~cope of
servIces on thIs project. The task wilt Focus on
fnter!!8ctfon operatfons and potentIal weevfng conFlIcts"
,.
3} Eve I vat f on of s,r;t1gn e~5t of the' ra! i r:".Qad,,,:tr:flcJ1a - t;h, e
task will en'ta I J eve 1 ue't t on of 'mPacts of the two bels f c
alterr~tfYe8 eaat of the treck~: t) 8 F've Jane roedwftv
wtth center t~-way leFt turn Jane or 2) a Four Jane
dfvided roadway wIth turn Isnes. The reJatfonehlp ~
these alternatIves wfth the sectfon fn the vfclnlty of
T~H. 169 wfll be accounted ror~ The preFerred desfgn and
'focatlon {north and/or south of the exfstlng roadway}
wi.1 be 'dentf'Ffed end reviewed wIth Ctty and County
stSI'f''F, .
Agreemen't No.' PW 38-01-90
Exhibit IIA". Sheet 3 of -,
.
4) Prepsrat'oo 9F ~ooce~~ Layout f~_~~~~lQn east of
rallroa~ tracks - based on Input From Cfty and County
staFFs? a 50 scale concept layout of the preFerred
alternative wlil be prepared~ The de~fgn of the west end
or this segment wfl' be fnterFaced wfth the analysf~ from
the tasks below.
5) f,;;va I uation of the sect f.Qn f n the vJJ;tof1:Y~ or _ T. H. 169. _
this task w1l1 Focus on the three alternatIves identiFied
In our previous analysts of the corrIdor as shown on
Figure A-I. The task wIll Involve:
. Preparation or year 2010 P.M. peak hour Forecasts at
the Following CSAH 3 Intersectfons (dependent upon the
alternatIve): Jackson Ave., Milwaukee Street. St~
--Loufs Street, T.H. 169 ramps. 5th Ave. South.
. Analysfsand evaJuatton or such aspects as trarFfc
operatfons? area accessibfl~ty, abIlIty to resolve
current dfF~{culties, and accepted desfgn standards.
.
.. Revfew wIth CIty and County 9taFFs~
, 6) er-eD!'3c~1: f on of Con~eQt Layout fqr C0fn91 ete Corr-h:for,-
besed upon f nput From Tasks 4 snd 5. a 50 sea! e concept
layout of the preFerred stternetfve For the complete
corrfdor.wfJJ be prepared.
7) Rev , 6...., of preFerr!:d e I terna;tJ y~ J:t L1:h , nvoJ_veg soene J,a -
th f 5 task w f I I enta f 1 a rev f ew of the concepl::w f th the
partfcfpant!S identified fn Task l. Based upon fnput9
modfFfcatfons to the concept wItt be made as approprfate.
8) a~~t and E~~eota~~ - thf~ task will include
preparation of B repOrt documenting our 8~IY$tsw
Ffndfngs~ recommendatIons. and the prererred alternatIve
and pre5entat1on to the Hopkfns Cfty Council~ ~or budg.t
purpOseSg. ft. 15 estfmated that 20 copVes of' the report
wIll-be prepared. Copfes of the preTerred alte~netfYe at
a 50 scaie wtit ~l50 be provfded.
Agreement No. PW 38-01~90
Exhibit uA~J Sheet 4 of 7
'c.
.
.,.
"
~"
f\.
:~':!::-
~r:i
~',
1~"
~t~':,i
~_;;'- OJ
~~::r
!y:,>-~'
~\",:'.
~L,
fo"---.;":':- <
;;.,-
':--'.
~~;:."- '.
UNOW
>-
I-
-0
Z"t
-0
UI};
ct:-...J
0>-
u.. <
Za:
Ul-'
W 0\
->%'0
'....0-
<t--
<t- .
WZ:<J:
a:: n:::a .
;:). iIJ ..J }-
en- <(
-...J:>tL.
t.a..<wo
IX
o
Q
- ..J
O=C
Q:VJ
8'i
Cf'ti
0.
:I:
Cl(
en
u
~
~~
~ ~ iPIi
-!5 I
~ 8 ~
iiz .,1
g <I II;
.,.t)...... H:'?
.~ ~
greem~nt No. P";l3
~'th H..o$ f "file c:h.,j.~+' 1:,
. -',0 ,'1'-.~
.;':~;-r . _: ~ ~, .;,....;~ ;..~:. '~.'( ..~: .:t'I,;; .~~' 1/..,;" ;.1:;:A~~ t:";:;t; ',;i: :3'-:~...~~;:. \~. ,: ~ .)~:~;. .:.:~V.;:~';r~~ ~t':-~ ~ ~ :, ~ \:,~"t.. .: ~'''::, ~ \{~ ~:',~. :"\ ~ 'l>~Y~i~~ :J~; ~;: ,..','. .\~:~:l .". ~ ,:J~ . : : ~\~ .j"~; / .'.~.:::~ ~'..:~~/~.<~~"~)':. ~.:: / ?~>~:'~'...l,~r\' -J';~; ,I :./,:,.""":"~:.'-I . ~.; \.':~.,\
NOS)fJV~ Z
\I
Wi
l'"l
lLJ
>
-
....
~ ~USUJ
a:
w _,
1<- ~""'.." ,.
...l..~
-4;.~~., li
~~'""~~~}~?;i
~
....
1-
i
~
....I
~
--
~^']l::
30HN
NQS>lJVI'
~
II
INU~
VI
N
'OSlnvr
~.
II,
Uti
;..
-.-.~
.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The 5p~crFfc project schedule .$ dependent upon when the
ba~e map writ be provfded to' us., We estimate that
approxfmately twelve weeks wfl} be needed From ~ecefpt or
the bS3e map to revfew of the concept with project
par.t f c f pants. Dependent upon reF r nements resu It i ng f'rom
t~f~ meeting. the Final report will requfre two to Four
weeks. Assuming that the base maps 'Were available by du~y
1~ 'J990, thfs schedule wfll result fn presentatIon to the
Cfty Councff In late October. 1990.
PROJECT COST
Ta~l& A-I provfdes an estfmate of personnel hours by work
ta~k. The estimated total project cost For our servfces fs
$23.000, whfch we would consIder a maximum not to exceed
unJess specIFic authorfzatfo~ were receIved.
.
I
J
j
Agreement No.. PW 38..01...90.
EXhibit !I A" ~. Sheet 6 01..7,
~-:
,.'...'.'.",,
". .
""-'.-' ".
~
Agreement No. PW 38.01-90
Exhibit "AI1 t .Sh~et 1 of 7
.
j
~---...
~~!!
-......
BCHCnSLL. &. MADSON, INC.
ENGINEERS" SURVEYORS.. PLANNERS
SOIL TeSTING
1~ WA't2ATA I3Cll..IL.SVAFIO .. ~ 1v'N~-el4B2
[6121546-7601 .. FAX iS12! e:ws.~
May 25, 1990
Mr. James Gessele
City of Hopk.ins
1010 First Street South
Hopkins, MN 55343
'... -
Subject :
County Road No. 3
Corridor Study Base Map
Dear Jim:
We have reviewed the area to be mapped. where the data needs to be
. obtained fr'om and how it can be tied to the state plane coordinate system.
We would obtain mylar positives from Horizons, Inc. at a scale of 1- .
SOt on 24- x 36~ sheets. The project will take about 4 sheets with all of
them having some overlap. The orientation will be parallel with Excelsior
Boulevard and not north.
.,;,'...'.',.,.
.1-
We would show all property and right~of-way lines in the defined area in
relation to the topography. The revised parking and entrance at Blake School
with be shown a~d any other obvious changes that are recognizable on the
ground will be changed on the topog.
Our estimated cost for this work which includes the providing of the
'mylar by Horizcms, rnc~ is $7.525.00.
We appreciate the opportunHy to furnish this proposal and look forward
to working with you O~ this project. let me know when you are ready to
proce&d so that we can direet Horizons to begin their work. We can begin,
within a few days aft~r ~uthorization, ind I would anticipate about 1 month
to complete the project.
A9~ement No.. p,w 38-01...90, .
Exhibit uSn, Sheet 1 of 6
~nve At.""f"IO.N .. <iiQUAL~ ~
- ~
SCHOELL & MADSON. INc..
.
Mr. James Gessele
-2-
May 25, 1990
r enclose our work tasks and hour estimate, and a copy of our agreement
with Horizons, Inc.
Very truly ~ours,
SCHOEll & MADSON, INC./
~,j)~
Theodore D. Kemna
TDKl cj
--,
encl.
:',.
.
.
aCHOELL & MACSON~ INe..
~JlRK TASKS AND fERSON~H~UR ESTIMATE
Field location and coordination
2 person crew
. .
Compute coordinate control
Draft property lines
Research and supervision
Printing, and costs
- .-.
40 nrs. @ $79.00
16 hrs. @ $42.00
32 hrs. @ $42.00
8 hrs. @ $68.00
Horizons, Inc.
Schoel'! & Madson, Inc. Total
TOTAL CONTRACT
$3,160.QO
672.00
Ip344.00
544.00
255.00
$5,975.00
1,550.00
$7,525.QO
Agreement N()~
Exhibit elS1\ ~