Memo CIP
~ ' -- ___~___.'._n ~..__~ .______~.__.'_~~___~,_~___~_'.____ ~
I
~ I
CITY OF HOPKINS
MEMORANDUM
DA'rE: October 11 r 1990
TO: city ~il
--,
I '
FROM: Thomas armening, Community Development Director
SUBJEC'l' ~ 1991-1995 elP
-- ---...- ...-.- -.. - - ...-- - -- - - - -- - - - --- - - - --- - - - - - - --- - - - -- --
Backqroun~'!.
On October 2, ~990 the City Council conducted a public hearing on
the 1991-1995 Capital Improvements Plan. The city Council
continued the hearing to the Councils 10/16/90 meeting.
. On October 9, 1990 the city council reviewed the elP during its
worksession. Questions and comments made during this review were
as follows:
0 ~xcelsior.cAye~u~ ~~~MtiticatiQn ~roiect (ST-15) - A point was
made that the project as proposed may be too aggressive to be
undertaken in its entirety in 1992. Staff would concur that
this might be the case. staff would suggest that the $25,000
allocation for 1991 for improvement planning purposes be kept
in the exp. Consideration could be given to reducing the I
expenditures in 1992 to $500,000 and spreading the remaining
part ave,/:' 1993-1995.
0 ~int~nanc~stIicts - Oiscussion took place rega~ding the I
use of maintenance districts for the prograroming of
improvements.
0 F~9Rext~ own~t N~tifiqatiQn - COD$ents were made that
consideration should be given in the f~ture towards providing
for a more detailed approach of informing the citizens of the
community on the projects proposed in the C,s<pital Improvements
Plan.
e ~et SW"E~'~ (~~~~Q) - Questions were raised and answered
regarding the acquisition of a street sweeper in 1991.
;.'f. 0 .P.2:t,ice lt~lnL VebiQl~$ CCl'4-~O) - Questions were raised and
answered regarding the proposed scheduling of police
~ ,~ administrative v~hicles.
- .""--.
0 ~~~ - Questions were raised and answered regarding the
overall use of MSA funds for City improvements projects~
~~ilIII!Wl ..- .- ,....-,!""'....""""'..------~~- -~"~~~~-~--
-. .-
During the Councils worksession, John Schedler outlined to the
city Council the i.mpact the CIP as proposed would have on the
city's various funding sources.
Po~sible council ~otionQ
The City council has several alternatives in terms of acting on
the CIP. These include~
1- Close public hearing and adopt elP as proposed.
2. Close public hearing and adopt CIP with modifications.
3. continue the pUblic hearing and discussion on the CIP until
the City Council meeting of November 6.
4. Close the public hearing~ conti.nue discussion on this matter
until the Council~s November 6, 1990 meeting.
I
I
xcc J
1
i
:]
.J
I
~j
"j
-)
",....i
,,~--' :..: ',- -'.I;
, - .~,~
;;'.;..-
. -', ,. ~ --I
;.-~". ,- ..
. _'. :.:;;,r~
,,","c. " :"~~
If;;.:'-Y"
~'~
~
.,.~.., ~.. ,
:<,,;"J .
c _,_, ,;..
:"':/~'. ' .... -:.~;:
i .~
~. ]
L".;,i;ti~'~""'''''''''''...''''~.''''b'' ..." ".,"-..~~. . ;.......~< . O"'it~ilIiIl"'~:'&'i~t