Loading...
Memo CIP ~ ' -- ___~___.'._n ~..__~ .______~.__.'_~~___~,_~___~_'.____ ~ I ~ I CITY OF HOPKINS MEMORANDUM DA'rE: October 11 r 1990 TO: city ~il --, I ' FROM: Thomas armening, Community Development Director SUBJEC'l' ~ 1991-1995 elP -- ---...- ...-.- -.. - - ...-- - -- - - - -- - - - --- - - - --- - - - - - - --- - - - -- -- Backqroun~'!. On October 2, ~990 the City Council conducted a public hearing on the 1991-1995 Capital Improvements Plan. The city Council continued the hearing to the Councils 10/16/90 meeting. . On October 9, 1990 the city council reviewed the elP during its worksession. Questions and comments made during this review were as follows: 0 ~xcelsior.cAye~u~ ~~~MtiticatiQn ~roiect (ST-15) - A point was made that the project as proposed may be too aggressive to be undertaken in its entirety in 1992. Staff would concur that this might be the case. staff would suggest that the $25,000 allocation for 1991 for improvement planning purposes be kept in the exp. Consideration could be given to reducing the I expenditures in 1992 to $500,000 and spreading the remaining part ave,/:' 1993-1995. 0 ~int~nanc~stIicts - Oiscussion took place rega~ding the I use of maintenance districts for the prograroming of improvements. 0 F~9Rext~ own~t N~tifiqatiQn - COD$ents were made that consideration should be given in the f~ture towards providing for a more detailed approach of informing the citizens of the community on the projects proposed in the C,s<pital Improvements Plan. e ~et SW"E~'~ (~~~~Q) - Questions were raised and answered regarding the acquisition of a street sweeper in 1991. ;.'f. 0 .P.2:t,ice lt~lnL VebiQl~$ CCl'4-~O) - Questions were raised and answered regarding the proposed scheduling of police ~ ,~ administrative v~hicles. - .""--. 0 ~~~ - Questions were raised and answered regarding the overall use of MSA funds for City improvements projects~ ~~ilIII!Wl ..- .- ,....-,!""'....""""'..------~~- -~"~~~~-~-- -. .- During the Councils worksession, John Schedler outlined to the city Council the i.mpact the CIP as proposed would have on the city's various funding sources. Po~sible council ~otionQ The City council has several alternatives in terms of acting on the CIP. These include~ 1- Close public hearing and adopt elP as proposed. 2. Close public hearing and adopt CIP with modifications. 3. continue the pUblic hearing and discussion on the CIP until the City Council meeting of November 6. 4. Close the public hearing~ conti.nue discussion on this matter until the Council~s November 6, 1990 meeting. I I xcc J 1 i :] .J I ~j "j -) ",....i ,,~--' :..: ',- -'.I; , - .~,~ ;;'.;..- . -', ,. ~ --I ;.-~". ,- .. . _'. :.:;;,r~ ,,","c. " :"~~ If;;.:'-Y" ~'~ ~ .,.~.., ~.. , :<,,;"J . c _,_, ,;.. :"':/~'. ' .... -:.~;: i .~ ~. ] L".;,i;ti~'~""'''''''''''...''''~.''''b'' ..." ".,"-..~~. . ;.......~< . O"'it~ilIiIl"'~:'&'i~t