Loading...
CR 88-134 Waiver of Plat - City Hopkins --- . .. , (J . - .... .. o .. K . .- June 29, 1988 Council Report: 88-134 WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS - CITY OF HOPKINS Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: That the request for a Waiver of the Platting Requirements bv the _city of Hopkins to add additional area for the Darking facility be approved. Approval of this motion will allow the City to obtain title to four additional parking spaces. Qyeryiew. Norwest Bank has agreed to transfer to public ownership a 44'XJ7' parking area just east of the other land which the bank transferred with the parking ramp. In the original plan the City was to have an easement for publ ic parking on this property. With this additional land the City will have title to all the parking area that was owned . by the bank. stat~ explained that this parking area was originally proposed to be a parking easement to the city It was later decided that the City should own this area to ensure uniformity and control of all the parking at the ramp and bank site. The Commission had very little discussion on this matter. The Commission voted unanimously to approve the Waiver of the Plat to add a 44'x37' area to the parking ramp facility by Resolution 88-45. ~ssues to Conside~ 0 What is the impact of allowing this waiver? Supoorting pocuments. 0 Map o Resolution 0 Planning Report ..z i 0- '" / 1><.. . { >_ ~d ,h... ~ .r'..' ~.. ,,-,dt. ~~(_ Nancy s. derson . Community Development Analyst -- .-- It ".. . CRS8-l34 Page 2 pttailed Backaround. The subject parcel which the bank is proposing to transfer to the City consists of 4 parking spaces. The existing setbacks will not be affected. - What is the impact of allowing this waiver? The new lots created will not change any existing conditions except to make one lot smaller and the other larger. The ordinance requirenents are all met. The original land obtained by the City included all the parking spaces along the north side of the site except these four spaces on the east. It was felt by the steff and the bank that the City ahould have title to all the parkjnq to insure uniformity and control of all the parking at the ramp and the bank site. ,. The only obliga~ion of the City as a result of the trte an.fer will be ~o maintain this property, ia: snow removal, seal coa~. This should create no problem as athe City will be doing this work for the ramp and adjacent surface parking in this area. Alternatives. 1. Approve the Waiver of Plat. By grantinq the Waiver the City will obtain title to the subject area. ~: 2. Deny the Waiver. By denying the Waiver, the bank will .. reatin possession of four parking spaces. 3. Deny the Waiver but have the applicant subdivide the property. This alternative will have the same results as a Waiver, but add an additional cost. 4. Continue for further information. If the commission feels that more information is needed, the item should be continued. . , lIP , (J . - e '\. ., (l J'l- f( \ ,- June 20, 1988 Planning Report: WVR88-2 WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS - CITY OF HOPKINS .f.,roDosed Action. staff recommends the following motion: That the reauest for a Waiv~r of the Plattinq Reauirements bv the City of Hopkins to add add~tional ar@~ for the Darkinq faqilitv be approved. Approval of this motion will allow the City to obtain title to four additional parking spaces. . .." OVerview e..,. Horwest Bank has agreed to trasfer to public ownership a 44 'X37;':'.'3% parkinq area just east of the other land which the bank transferr8d.'):l;i',~~;~ wi'th the parking ramp e In the original plan the City vasto have' a~C;"{;;-~"~~ easeaent for public parkinq on this property. With this a<ldit:io~l.:,;'Bi:~ . .... ., .... . ,";z land the City will have title to all the parkinq area that was owned . ">.,':',:0 -- by 1:he bank. . . :'.)Nj ,,'C', . .,,,' .....- .~. "' )\, f: ::'_'.:;;'<:~ Issues tOConsider~ .:'.-'"\:'f;.;'" .... ...:,~f;*~ - What is the impact of allowinq this va! ver? c."., ."C''','<. ; . --:-:;::~..~~:'/ ._'C,:',,:,-.'. c -.. ,~. "', ,,~ . , ;'" ."..r,~ -"X,,:, ~~ SUDDortincr Docum~nts. ~'.. . ."~"'~'._:~'~:~~~ . . ...::J.;;~ - Hap ',';;"li;~; - Resolution ....},B ~~ ".-:,; - -- ~ - .. - -- ~" -,. , . . , .._ _ n ..~,.~ ,-'. ~ _.~ - - " - -,- -... ..,.~ . . ... -- ,.,. , -.. . -- . - - ... ""- -,' -',--, ~ '-. --- - .--..-,. ... . ~ - ~ e WVR:88-2 Page 2 Oet~iled Backg~Qund. The subject parcel which the bank is proposing to transfer to the City consists of 4 parking spaces. The existing setbacks will not be affected. - What is the impact of allowing this waiver? The new lots created will not change any existing conditions except to make one lot smaller and the other larger. The ordinance requirement.s are all met. The original land obtained by the city included all the parkin~ spaces along ~~e north side of the site except these four spaces on the east. It was felt by the staff and the bank that the city should have titl. to all the parking to insure uniformity and control of all the parking e at the ramp and the bank site. The only obliqation of the City as a ~esult of the transfer will be to maintain this property, ie: snow raoval, sea.l coat. This should create no problem as athe city will be doing this work for the ramp and adjacent surface parking in this area. Alternat.ives. 1. Approve the Waiver of Plat. By granting the Waiver the City will obtain title to the subject area. 2. Deny the Waiver. By denying the Waiver, the bank will reatin possession of four parking spaces. 3. Deny the Waiver but have the applicant subdivide the property. This alternative will have the same results as a Waiver, but add an additional cost. 4. Continue for further information. If the Commission feels that more information is needed, the item should be continued. , < , .' ,: . .-. . " . - - j .""") ?- . ~ - ~... 0 ~'A- . . . ~ " ~ , - , " . .01 If o1l"l'\. 1<",~ d'I ~'VO . ' .,t-\lIl',,, f( It''O .':n- ~: . '/ OL~. o.tV\ . : I 10 e..WALM 'O~: . . r ~,I . , , . 1 :I . : I , '- ~ , , < I - () . , -J : , JO''\ ")'1 ... I - . . .. ,-, ,-....." '-- . , I ~" ((\ o. :1 '" .' ~'. "" .;~ ..", ;.. '0'''' .,... l~.__ "I ~~'" '. #)~ .,'1 If 40 tI '0 :,1 ' ... ,~-;;\ :?\ q " '2 "".~:'~ : I : " . , '" CI' * . f - . , , , ., :r '. . o. N # : r---.:- -- ..' - , ',' 1) " " . , , ' ' ~ , , :,O,~ ft'" .' 0'" C .' ~t>.1.:', "I'''' .. q I( ."to O~."'lf, ..~, ""..... """ ~ \ \ ... . . " " . . .. . $ , , ',' e. 0 ",,, " . , II-' "-- * , . , "1\,\>1 ~ . ","\. "I'''' '.. X I( , ...:"l o.,.~ -.' , ., . , . , ,1<0 i - . It CITY OF HOPKINS RESOLUTION NO: 88-45 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND DENYING APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUIREMENTS WVR88-2 WHEREAS, an application for a Waiver of the Platting Requirements has been filed by the City of Hopkins to add additional area for the parking facility between 10th , 11th Avenues South and north of the Norwest Bank. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an applcation for a Waiver of the Platting Requirements was filed with the city of Hopkins on June 6, 1988. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on June 28, 1988. 3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notices, held a public hearing on June 28, 1988; all persons present at the __ hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. i 4. That the written comments and analysis of the '.,'" . City staff and the Planning Commission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to Waiver WVR88-2 1. That the new lots created meet the lot area for the B-2 district. 2. That the existing setbacks will not be affected by the new division line. Adopted this 5th day of July, 1988. Donald J. Hilbert, Mayor-- e ,-