CR 88-203 Engineer's Report - Campbell Addition
.
.
.
()
~~
~
.... '>
o .'
" t< \
october 25r 1983
council Report: 88-203
ENGINEERS REPORT
STREET RECONSTRUCTION - CAMPBELL ADDITION AREA
pro~osed Action.
staff recommends the following motion:
Resolutio 0 derin Public
Addition area~ be adopted.
Move that Resolution No: 88-91.
street 1m rovements
The original petitions were for an Engineer's Report. 'l'his ac:tic)l1',
will accept the Engineer's Report and will continue an assessable.
project by calling for a Public Hearing on December 6, 1988.
QYerview.
A petition has been received from the campbell Addition area for an ..
engineer's study conducted to identify advantages, disadvantages, and
relative costs of two alternatives to improving the streets in the
Campbell area.
A normal petition would be for an improvement. This petition is for
an engineer's study only. If a project is initiated as a result of'
this study and hearing, the Council could order the project
constructed, after public hearing, but it would take a 4/5 vote of the
council to order the project constructed.
primarY
o
o
Issues to consider.
Should the council proceed,with a Public Hearing?
What are the current conditions of the roadway and storm
drainage?
Should the council consider the petition for a study for
a two-inch overlay?
Timetable for improvements?
o
o
supporting Information.
o Typical petition
o Map showing location of petitioners property
o Resolution
.
ordon P. Anderson
Director of Engineering
~
.
.
.
CR:B8-203
Page 2
BaoJtqro\lnc3.
The homeowners have been concerned about the status of the streets in
their area. They have been discussing alternatives with City staff
for several months. After the city adopted the Roadway Improvelnent
Policy whereby the city shares 40% of the cost of a complete
reconstruction, there has been more acceptance of a possible project
in their area.
The petition, as presented, asks to have an engineering study
conducted to i.dentify advantages and disadvantages and relati.ve costs
of improving the streets in accordance with Hopkins Roadway
Improvement Policy 17-D section 3, ~oadways.
Present policy is for the City to install storm sewers where needed
out of the storm Sewer Fund. storm sewers are needed to control the
drainage and to protect the street surfaces and subqr~de. storm
sewers would be installed based on the forthcoming storm Water
Management Plan.
The street Reconstruction Policy calls for the property owners to pay
60% of the costs with the city paying 40%. This is for complete
restoration, which restoration will include the installation of
concrete curb and gutter.
~!lalvsis.
In response to the petition1 the council has the fOllowing primary
issues to consider:
How should the Council proceed if the petition is honored?
If the petition is honored, the Council, by resolution, should request
an Engineer's R.eport. This will set up the project for an assessable
proj ect. As the petition did not ask for the proj ect but only the
report, the Council could proceed under the provisions of the statute,
where, if there is less than 35% in frontage of the real property
abutting on the streets named in the petition as the location of the
improvements, the resolution adopting the project may be adopted only
by a vote of four-fifths of all members of the Council.
.
.
.
1
.!
I
I
CR:88-203
Page 3
What are the current conditions of the roadway and storm drainage?
The streets in the petition were constructed about 25-30 years ago.
The city has no record of the amount of base material or the type of
asphal t surface. constructed. The streets were constructed without
curbing. This type of construGtion allows surface water to infiltrate
into the base material, weakening the base and causing failure of the
asphalt surfact.
storm sewers exist only on Herman Terrace. All surface water drains
on the road surface or leaves the road toward the edges, eventually
softening the base. No curbing exists on the streets which would
control the storm waters. '
Timetable for improvements?
A hearing on the report to order the project constructed could be held
the first meeting in December. This would be t.oo late in 1988 to
construct a project of this size. The homeowners have been told that
if a project is ordered in, that it would not begin before early 1989
and would be completed and assessed in 1989. They are aqreeable to
this timetable.
Alternatives.
1. Accept the Engineer's Report and order a Public Hearing.
This action would be the next step that is necessary for
an assessment project. For the project to be ordered at
the public hearing, a 4/5 vote of the Council would be
required.
2. Do no accept the Enginee's Report and deny the petition
as presented. This action would return the petition to
the Hobby Acres homeowners for further action based on
the fact that the petition is not a standard petition.
staff recolmnends Alternatiave No.1, accepting the Engineer's Report
and call for a public hearing on December 6, 1988.
CITY OF HOPKINS
PETITION fOR LOCAL IMP~OVEMENT5
.
To the Counei I of the City o~ HopkIns:
We, the undersigned. being the owners of
abutting on the improvement hereby and
petltfoned for, do hereby ~.~f't.A .~1~
4-v-r' ~ ~~~~~rl ~nrl ~^n~rr~-t
rea I property
hereinafter
l."U 11lCI-"'-~
~0EST LruNC~rJEfI2-IN(~ ~TUbY Tt, ct'~lIAJ,t
EA'5(QiUT'I fF A 5-n2ttT {~'lPJ2t.~Vfo1fNT.JI2(Jt(l_T
along the fa I low i ng street. avenue. a I ley 0,' thoroughfare f n
the Fallowing location in the City of Hopkins:
fif?LAtA ~~ -rf5RKN!E-
.
. . ..ar" ."W ~'l.l"'i" ~..._~ t~~ .....-SUI.:"...-.... f?r-w......l. tit... -.....-YV
a.v ,.~. ..... .f tA- A.A. '.R1IIlC1'. ~.ti...ilW~.-.. f'1- .rJd
(~~ t. fit" ~ ~....Qg~d"""n,..a-wft:h Mhu:tec;"1::~ .sr~tl,~a~ ~'Q n I I ~
~}. :. I . Tl.~ _...~ ~ a 5"'8"" ; a- ire- .... fll ..4.1.1 U "~.4 \. i tlt\ 11_.-- L ~_
'1._...' _I.' j Jle PI i f 9Y #1:1.0 ~............"... l......._..-..-ts.
Assessable roadway Improvement proJects shall conform with
the procedur-a I requ f rements of M f nnesota Statute Chapter
429.
NA~ES OF PETITION~S
Mx.t- ~lk./ , it . ~~. .Ja~
~ 4 ~1.. I-J f!y tl'k'"\ 1..-\ R r r
33 7PIt:~1',1'~;- /~t ~
V../
~-J ~fl /J4?~f-'?%a-7t.-. $-1,t.
_:'-'~/.5 r/e~(/r 'klr.
/ ' 71 Ij ~,'
'. '. dl:./ 1/ f.,y3....
";'';'{
{~~--.i~ :L/~'''''-
.y J-t J
. .:n' ~
----,.....------------
.
.
CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 88-91
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 88-50 of the
Council adopted June 21, 1988, a report has been prepared by
Robert T. Toddie, City Engineer, TKDA, with reference to
improvement of Campbell Addition Area streets by the
reconstruction thereof with curb and gutter and asphalt
surface and the installation of storm sewers, thereon and
'.
this report was received by the Council on November 1, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, as follows:
1. The Council will consider the improvement of such
streets in accordance with the report and the assessment of
for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant
to M.S.A., Sacs. 429.011 to Sacs. 429.111, as amended, at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of $347,323; and
will further consider the market value before and after said
.
improvement, of the property affected thereby.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed
improvement on the 6th day of December, 1988, in the Council
Chambers of the City Hal~ at 7~30 o'clock p.m., and the
Clerk shall give published notice of such hearing and
improvement as required by law.
Adopted by the Council of the city of Hopkins,
Minnesota, this 1st day of November, 1988.
James A. Genellie
City Clerk
DONALD J. HILBERT,
Mayor
JERRE A. MILLER,
City Attorney
...:..'........
.....
.
. ~~. :.. ~-.--; ~ .", j.'. . . "."... ..'".' ~ '.' :..
.-...
I N lfljJ
f I
~
5TH 1'10.
OJ 209 215
III :!.I -.l 0'1
~ :::- ~
~ ;:;. .Q
~ I~
~
i5 N (;j
e
~
-0
m --
Q -i
-
-1
B
z
m
:0
en
g E
v.
""
,..
..'-'
i!!to.L - 11.' N I ~ ~ Els~
s :) :..;.':;:..
,sqe . J/2-~ . :$zo r 1.t ., 8,]<1
. - . --
CO. RD.
40
..., r1a VI "" ~ N ~
i1 ~ ~ in i & ~ ..
S .Ie ~
~. ~ '::".l ~ ~ ,~ ::z
,g, oS :.:! R1 ~
-oJ Cl VI .. c.li N
''N
3/4 320 J.U .!! UI
3/9 325 JJI
t1I Ul
~ ~
~
~ -'
Vi VI
$. ~
,~ !,;.I N
4/2
4
" .:.
. .
,