The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda HOPKINS CITY COUNCIL FINAL AGENDA . June 4,2002 8:15 p.m. THIS FINAL AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL THE START OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Schedule: 8:00 pm - HRA Meeting 8: 15 pm - City Council Meeting Work Session at conclusion of City Council meeting I. CALL TO ORDER II. OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENTS/CONCERNS (Public must fill out a Speaker Request Form. Three minute limit for each person) III. REPORTS - COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS 1. Chemical Health Commission 2. Zoning and Planning Commission IV. CONSENT AGENDA . 1. Minutes of May 21, 2002 City Council meeting 2. Minutes of May 28 City Council Work Session 3. Ratify prior month's disbursements 4. Appointments to Boards and Commissions (Memo) 5. Annual Farmers Market agreement; (CR2002-1 03) - Anderson 6. Temporary 3.2 beer license for Jaycees Raspberry Festival; (CR2002-98) - Obermaier 7. Approve MnDOT maintenance agreement, Excelsior Boulevard; (CR2002-1 02)- Stadler 8. Approve Hovander easement; (CR2002-1 01 ) - Bot 9, Moved to New Business #1 a 10, Reorder bids for Central Park storm sewer improvements; (CR2002-1 00) - Bot Vote: Brausen Jensen - Rowan - Johnson Maxwell V. OLD BUSINESS 1. Discussion of sidewalk deletion request from Peter Keller; (Memo) - Stadler Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson Maxwell . QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? CALL THE RAZZLE LINE - 939-1421 (The Razzle Line is the City of Hopkins voice message system) VI. NEW BUSINESS . 1 a. Schedule public hearing for July 2 and consider modification of redevelopment plan for Redevelopment Project #1; (CR2002-99) - Kerrigan Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson Maxwell - 1 b. Variance front yard setback, 101 Interlachen Road; (CR2002-90) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen - Rowan - Johnson Maxwell 1. First reading, rezone Regency development to PUD; (CR2002-91) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson Maxwell 2. CUP Regency development; (CR2002-92) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen - Rowan Johnson Maxwell 3. Preliminary/final plat Regency development; (CR2002-93) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson - Maxwell - 4. First reading, rezone Marketplace Lofts to PUD;: (CR2002-94) - Anderson . Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson Maxwell - - 5. CUP Marketplace Lofts; (CR2002-95) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson Maxwell 6. Preliminary/final plat Marketplace Lofts; (CR2002-96) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen Rowan Johnson - Maxwell - 7. Approve transfer of Lots 46 and 47 to the Hopkins HRA (Marketplace Lofts project; (CR2002-80) - Kerrigan Vote: Brausen - Jensen Rowan - Johnson Maxwell 8. First reading vacation of alley, Cornerstone Group; (CR2002-97) - Anderson Vote: Brausen Jensen - Rowan - Johnson Maxwell 9. Moved to #1b. . VII. ADJOURNMENT QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? CALL THE RAZZLE LINE - 939-1421 (The Razzle Line is the City of Hopkins voice message system) t . . A regular meeting of the Hopkins City Council was held on May 21, 2002, in the Council Chambers of the Hopkins City Hall. Present were Mayor Maxwell and Council Members Brausen, Jensen, Johnson, and Rowan. Also, present were staff members Mielke, Genellie, Stadler, Kerrigan, Bot, Anderson, Yager, and City Attorney Jerre Miller. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Maxwell called the meeting to order at 7:33 p,m. II. OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENTS AND CONCERNS Peter Keller, 200 11 th Ave N, appeared before the Council regarding the sidewalk that is proposed for his side of 2nd Street North. He presented the Council with signatures of 19 people who opposed the sidewalk. Mayor Maxwell encouraged him to meet with Steve Stadler. Don Roesner, 618 W. Park Valley Drive, spoke about the new gift and tobacco shop. The store has a temporary sign that says Tobacco and gifts. He wanted to know whether this was appropriate. This issue was referred to the City Council. . Tina Jensen, 241 13th Avenue North, read a letter to the Council. The letter concerned a dispute about a Shoestring Players production and whether it violated the lease the Arts Center had with Stages Theatre. She said she understood that a third party would be consulted for an opinion on the legal issues involved. She said she would like to be a party to those discussions. III. REPORTS - COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS 1 . Park Board Mark Kuhl, Chair of the Park Board, reported that the Board reviewed the Solheim Cup agreement and the plans for improvements in Downtown Park. The Board discussed ideas for a dog park in south Hopkins where dogs could run without leashes. Mr. Kuhl also discussed that he and another Board member are completing their second terms at a point where they are just becoming comfortable with their roles. He mentioned that the Park Board members are also members of the joint recreation committee with Minnetonka and the Minnetonka Park Board members serve for eight years. . May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 t 2. Human Rights Commission . Pat Olsen, co-chair of the HRC, gave an update on the Fiesta de Mexico that is occurring on June 1 and the Heritage Celebration scheduled for July 20, She also said that the Commission needs new members. IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes of May 7, 2002 City Council meeting 2. Approve design, order bids, 2002 a[[ey projects;(CR2002-81 ) 3. Approve construction agreement for Co Rd 73/Hwy 7 improvement project; (CR2002-82) 4. Approve final payment for 2001 sealcoat project; (CR2002-84) 5, Approve final payment for 2001 sidewalk project; (CR2002-85) 6. General and liability 'Insurance renewal; (CR2002-64) 7. HCA, Inc, loan approval; (CR2002-89) Regarding item #2, Council Member Rowan said that he did flot see a dollar amount for contingency. Steve Bot replied that with smaller projects the City adds the contingency after the bids have corne in, Also smaller projects have less chance for unforeseen problems, Regarding item #3, severa! Council Members said that they noticed a discrepancy . between the costs indicated in the report and those that are stated in the agreement. Mr. Stadler replied that the cost estimates in the report were correct, They included additional costs that were not in the agreement. Council Member Rowan had a question concerning Section III of the agreement, It appeared that the Minnetonka enqineer can ask for a change and that the City of Hopkins is responsible for the cost of any delay in approving the change. He wondered what would happen if the City of Hopkins did not agree with the change. Mr. Bot said that that result was not the intent of the language in this section and that he would be looking at amending the language. Council Member Rowan moved and Council Member Brausen seconded a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously, . May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 --- . V. OLD BUSINESS 1 . Second reading, vehicle storage ordinance; (CR2002-78) Ms. Anderson said that the only change since the first reading was to add additional language to Section 550.03, Subd. 5 to allow lots that exceed the 30 percent coverage or average width to replace or repair the existing driveway with a new one of the same dimensions. Council Member Rowan said that the ordinance allowed an accessory building and a garage. Could someone have two accessory buildings if they did not have a garage? Ms. Anderson said that was correct. A garage is defined as an accessory building. Mr. Roesner asked if the improved surface for parking must be next to the garage. Ms, Anderson said that this was correct. Council Member Brausen moved and Council Member Johnson seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 2002-873 making amendments to the zoning ordinance for second reading and order it published. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. . 2. Second reading, miscellaneous zoning ordinance changes, (CR2002-79) Ms, Anderson said that the ordinance was revised since the first reading. It defined open and closed porches. The Council discussed the porch issue and decided the definitions and the setbacks needed to be reviewed by the Zoning and Planning Commission, Mayor Maxwell moved and Council Member Rowan seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 2002-874, making amendments to the zoning ordinance, but without sections 515,07 Closed Porch, 515.07 Open Porch and 520,09, for second reading and order it published. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. VI. NEW BUSINESS 1 , Approve revised plans Metro Transit Park & Ride; (CR2002-88) Metro Transit began using the existing park-n-ride lot at 8th Avenue South and Excelsior Blvd as a transit hub in April 2001, City Council approved a transit hub . construction plan in February 2001. This construction plan required the use of City and HCRRA property. The original schedule was to use an interim plan until permanent construction was completed in the fall of 2001. However, due to environmental and legal reasons Metropolitan Council wasn't able to secure a lease May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting Min utes Pag€ 3 ---- agreement for the HCRRA property. The construction plan has been modified to . eliminate the need for HCRRt>-, property, A lease agreement has been drafted and reviewed by the City Attorney. The lease is a 7 -year renewable lease allowing Metropolitan Council use of city property and requiring that the Metropolitan Council maintain the facility. George Serumgard, Metropolitan Transit, and Stuart Krahn, Bonestroo & Associates, presented the new pian to the CounciL Coullcil Member Johnson asked whether there would be bike racks at the site. Mr. Serumgard said that Hennepin Parks would be providing bike lockers, Mayor Maxwell asked whether parking could be expanded in the future. He was told that it could be. He also had questions regarding servicing the toilets and security on the site. Mr. Krahn said that the design of the toilets allowed for servicing, Mr. Serumgard said that Transit superintendents and Transit police would provide security, The Hopkins police department wiil only be involved if a crime occurs at the site. He said that there have been very few incidents at the currem site, Council Member Johnson moved and Council Member Jensen seconded a motion to approve revised transit hub/park-n-ride facility plans and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign a lease agreement between the City of Hopkins and Metropolitan Council for a transit hub/park-n-ride facility. A poll of the vote was as . follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. 2. Off sale liquor license application for Mac's Liquor Inc. at 8554 Excelsior Boulevard; (CR2002-77) David, Sue, and Carrie McCarville have applied for an off sale liquor license to operate all off sale store at 8554 Excelsior Boulevard. The store will be managed by Carrie. Mayor Maxwell as ked if there might be time to notify the Interlachen Park neighborhood about this proposal. Council Members Jensen, Brausen, and Rowan said that they did not think that a liquor store in this location would affect any neighborhood. Council Member Brausen said that he would like to see a discussion in the future concerning the locations of liquor and tobacco stores. Council Member Jensen moved and Council lVIember Johnson seconded a motion to approve an off sale liquor license for Mac's Liquor, incorporated, dba Mac's Liquor at 8554 Excelsior Boulevard with the condition that a certificate of insurance showing liquor liability is received and that, prior to opening, Carrie McCarville . completes formal training in the duties and responsibilities associated with the operation of a liquor license. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 .- . Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, abstain, The motion carried. 3. Approve engineering agreement, 2003 street improvement project, (CR2002- 86) The 2002-2006 CIP identifies street improvements for the year 2003 along 2nd Street North (5th Avenue North to 6th Avenue North) and 5th Avenue (3rd Street South to Highway 7). The first step in proceeding with a 2003 project is ordering a feasibility report, Staff has selected a qualified consultant to prepare the feasibility study/preliminary engineering report for the project and requests City Council approval to proceed. The cost of the report, preliminary engineering, and geotechnical evaluation is $14,920. Mr. Mielke asked about the current weight restrictions on 5th if state aid funds were used to reconstruct the street. Mr. Stadler replied that jf state aid funds are used the City would be unable to restrict traffic. Council Member Jensen suggested that a neighborhood meeting be held as soon as possible to inform the residents of this proposal. Mr. Bot said that a neighborhood meeting was in the schedule after some preliminary design work was completed, It was decided to notify the neighborhood now of the proposed project and inform them that a neighborhood meeting will be . held once preliminary design work is completed. Council Member Rowan moved and Council Member Johnson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2002-47, Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Feasibility Report For Year 2003 Street Improvements. A poll of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. 4, Approve engineering services agreement, Shady Oak Pond drainage improvements, (CR2002-83) Shady Oak Pond currently does not have an outlet and as a result the surrounding street and residential properties flood if the pond is not pumped out when it gets near flood levels. In the 1997 Hopkins Flood Response Action Plan adopted by the Hopkins City Council, the Shady Oak Pond area was identified as Area No.1 and is the last remaining project area in the action plan. The first step in proceeding with the Shady Oak Pond Storm Sewer Improvement Project is ordering a feasibility report, Staff has selected a qualified consultant to undertake preliminary engineering and compiling the report and requests City Council approval to proceed. The cost of the report, project survey, research, and agency coordination . work is $28,095, Project design and construction oversight services would be negotiated separately after the report phase and Council's ordering of the improvement project. It is anticipated that this work will ultimately be constructed at approximately the same time as the Shady Oak Road reconstruction project and May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 ----- other planned area roadway reconstructions. Mayor Maxwell asked whether it . would be better to wait for the County to reconstruct Shady Oak, Mr. Stadler said that since most of the inflow comes from Hopkins neighborhoods, the City would be responsible for coming up with a solution. Council Member Brausen moved and Council Member Rowan seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2002-44, Resolution Ordering the Preparation of a Feasibility Report For the Shady Oak Pond Storm Sewer Improvement Project. A polt of the vote was as follows: Council Member Brausen, aye; Council Member Jensen, aye; Council Member Rowan, aye; Council Member Johnson, aye; Mayor Maxwell, aye. The motion carried unanimously. Vii. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Council Member Jensen moved and Council Member Johnson seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent at 9:00 p.rn. Respectively Submitted, Jim Genellie, Assistant City Manager . COUNCIL MEMBERS - ATTEST: Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor . May 21, 2002 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 , May 28, 2002 Page 1 . MINUTES CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - May 28, 2002 A work session of the Hopkins City Council was held at 6:35 p.m. on May 28, 2002, at the City Hall. Council members present were Mayor Maxwell and Council members Brausen, Johnson and Rowan. City personnel present were City Manager Mielke, Public Works Director Stadler, PImming & Economic Development Director Kerrigan, Asst. City Engineer Bot, Housing Coordinator Kersten Elverum, Police Chief Reid and Finance Director Yager. Also present were Sid lImlan of Ehlers & Associates, Kim Vohs, John Everett, Steve Cramer and Jonathan Farmer. Community Involvement Programs Housing Coordinator Elverum said Hopkins has received a request from Community Involvement Programs (ClP) to pass a resolution supporting their receipt of funds through the Hennepin County Affordable Housing Incentive Fund program to purchase a duplex at 1301/1303 Oxford Street. The resolution is needed for CIP to receive the funds, but is not required for ClP to purchase the property ami operate it as supportive housing. . Mr. Cramer said such housing is given a "high priority" rating in the county-wide consolidated plan. Mr. Farmer said there are t\\'o possible problem areas: old zoning codes for group homes do not apply as supportive housing is a concept that emerged in the past 10 years. Tenants have leases and pay rent, but receive support services from elP; this type of housing is much more like rentals than" group homes." The second area is public perception of mental illness. The city would need to assure the puhlic. Mr. Everett said CIP already has a home in Hopkins with 2 older women residents. ClP runs 20 homes and 2 apartment buildings, with 70 tenants total. They have had a contract with Hennepin County since the 1980's. As to police concerns, they have a 24 hour staff on call. Ms. Elverum said the staff concerns are the "not in my back yard" attitude and police call load. Chief Reid said elP is a very reputable company, but his staff is at maximum load right now, especially since he is down 5 officers. Recently there were 2 mental health situations involving knives in Hopkins. Mr. Rowan said while he shares Chief Reid's concerns, anyone moving into Hopkins would be a concern. Thus police case load is not a concern of his in voting. Answering Ms. Johnson's questions, Mr. Vohs said the property would come off the tax rolls as crp is non-profit; Mr. Mielke said there could not be city fee for services but there ha ve been agreements of payments in lieu of taxes (Mr. Everett said that would be vvorked out \vith the county, but CIP has done it); Mr. Vohs said neighbors are talked to on a one- to-one basis before the property is closed on; leases are broken by drug and alcohol abuse (they are given one chance and evicted on second offense). elP has a 90% success rate because they monitor so \vell. Most who move out do so because they have found . pennanent jobs and want to live alone, rather than share a home as they do under erp. Answering Mayor Maxwell, they said tenants are same sex in each housing unit, .----- ~ ~. May 28, 2002 Page 2 most do not have cars. They do not generate the calls such as Dow Towers does because . these are not developmentally disabled adults, and because of CIP's support services. Llcensed nurses are the major support staff Mr. V ohs added their priority is to integ.rate people into neighborhoods so they pick people who will not be problems. They need the resolution before closing on Junc 28. Answering: Mr. Mielke Mr. V ohs said if the resolution is not passed so they cannot get the S175,000 funding, they would probably not purchase the duplex. Mr. Brausen said he worked for Clr in the past and feels they are better providers and have better staffrhan mO:it. He thinks Clr would help with other mental health people and actually lower the number of pulice ..:alls, He feels the risk is lower than taking "off the street" renters. !\1r. Vohs said Robbinsuale has not supported a CIP resolution because they ha\'e a tax base issue and received st'nTalnon-profit group applications at the same time. 1\11". Everett said they h:.rve concentrated on the western suburbs because the)' started in Minnetonka and were asked by St Louis Park to put homes there. Next year they wili be using regional staff; the first such will he in Crystal starting next week. Mr. Everett said Hennepin County offers training OIl poiice caUs \yith mentally ill and v./Ould help Hopkins get that. They would also help with Do\\' Towers. General Consensus: Further information is needed on '" in lieu of' payments amI how CIP could help v:idl other properlies such as Dow Towers. Perhaps other properties can be viewed. Karen Jensen should be updated. Mayor Maxwell would like feedback from . neighbors. This should come up at the June 18 Council meeting. North Annex Discussion Planning & Economic Development Director Kerrigan said sraff needs further direction 011 working with SuperValu. SuperValu wants to know what is the minimum slle for which TIF would he available, what types of buildings are not acceptable, etc. Mr. Inman noted the city has already put $3 million into 3. new intersection. Me. Mielke added he feels SuperValu Joes not really understand tax increments. Mr. Kerrigan said he told them that if they meet zoning codes they can build whalever they \vant; if they want city assistance, they need to meet city desires. The property is on the tax rolls as $7.9 million; a recent appraisal came in lower, bur he was not g:\"cll the figure. Mayor Maxwell said he feels 450,000 sq. ft. would be the minimum. OLher agreed. !\1r. Kerrigan said the option agreement needs to be redone and is planned for mid-June. He feels it is mandatory to include language that if construction i~ phased in, TIF is not gi ven until it is camp] ered. General Consensus: Building shuuld be 450-600.000 sq. ft.; no residential units: phasing is permitted but TIF will be awarded only on a pay-as-perform hasis with a master plan in place before anything is started. An office campus is what is wanted, not a "Home Depot" type business. . ~ - ~ - ~-- May 28, 2002 Page 3 . CIP Review Finance Director Yager noted County Road 3 and County Road 61 were the only 2002 projects that got delayed. She noted only PIR or Current Revenue numbers affect the tax levy or budget, other funding sources do not. There will be 3 bond issues, but all go before the bonding council at once and there is only one rating fee. Projects were then looked at individually. Particular Council comments included: the shuffleboard needs to go before the Park Board again, there needs to be more work done on the message board concept; Burnes Park needs a master plan - the hockey rink there needs to be discussed; security system for parking ramp needs discussion. Mr. Mielke noted that an initial planning meeting with the school about the Pavilion will be this week. Ms. Yager noted that the Economic Development Fund, Housing and Redevelopment Fund are in very good shape. Parking Fund will be out of money in 2008; the Cable TV fund will be hurting by 2007 if money keeps being used for HCA. She plans to decertify TIF 1.1,2.7 and 2.8 in 2005. Mr. Mielke said Council should closely look at the 2003 figures; if more information is needed, let staff know. The figures will now go through staff, then be brought back in 1-1 1/2 months. Equipment replacement figures will come soon. 2003 Budget Parameters . Ms. Yager asked how should she instruct department heads on preparing budgets. Mr. Mielke added the big question is \vhat the legislature will do. Even if the levy is set at the maximum, people will neeL! to be cut in March. There was general discussion. Ms. Yager said the letter to department heads would go out by the end of the week and figures will come back in July. The maximum levy needs to be set by the Council by the end of August. General Consensus: Staff should prepare several budgets including same total as last year and cutback 3-4 %. The Depot needs to be discussed soon as the other partners are talking of backing out. Other CIP Housing Mr. Brausen re-opened this issue, saying he really supports CIP but feels they must go to the neighbors, General consensus was that the neighbors must be talked to ahead of time, but it can be done with door-to-door visits rather than a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Brausen is willing to talk to eIP. Shoestring/HCA Mr. Mielke said Steve has agreed to allow the Shoestring production with two restrictions: no recruitment during Stages events and that Shoestring put disclaimers on . their literature making clear they are not connected to Stages. Politics in the City ~- May 28, 2002 Page 4 Mr. Mielke has been approached by politicians about appearing at city functions. . He said city policy is to not allow that. He is open to any feedback from Council, Pay Study Mr. Mielke said the pay study has been completed and will be released tomorrow. He briefly explained why points = pay does not work out due to market demand and union pay scales, Last time this \vas done staff was unhappy; he anticipates it will be again. 1\15. Johnson moved adjout'nment: Mr. Brausm seconded. Meeting adjourned at 11:05 [1.111, Kase.y Kesrer, Secrcrary COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~ ATTEST: . ~ -- -- Eugene J. Max\vell, I'vfayor . - CITY OF . ~ May 16, 2002 HOPKINS Council Report 2002-80 . TRANSFER OF PROPERTY TO HRA Proposed Action StalTrecommends approval of the following motion: approve transfer of Lots 7 and 46, Block 3, West Minneapolis, to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority In and For the City of Hopkins for development purposes, sub;ect to the following: . Such transfer shall be at no cost consideration; and . If development does not occur in accordance with the redevelopment agreement between Mainstreet Lofts LLC and the Hopkins HRA, the sub;ect property will be transferred to the City as determined necessary and appropriate. Overview The HRA has approved action to sell various lots on Block 3, West Minneapolis, to Mainstreet Lofts, LLC (The Cornerstone Group). The two lots identified in the subject action are presently . owned by the City of Hopkins; thus, there needs to be a transfer to the BRA prior to completing a sale with the developer. City ordinance allows for transfer of City-owned property to the HRA specifically for redevelopment purposes. The City Attorney's office will complete the necessary paperwork to facilitate the transfer with approval of the subject action. Supportin2 Documents Site map - , / (...--.~- /~~ L~ Jim Kerrigan ,/ ' 'J Plat1l1ing & ECOn?J1lic Development Director ( . Financial Impact: $ 0 N/A ~ Budgeted: Y IN _ Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ------ ----~ i t - -== -= 1-1........, I / ? 4 <t'1 '+ .. C; 6471 Q 5 I ell - 5 5 C --~. 6 4 <:1 l- I <t'1 6 6 - ~ 3 C '" 7 ~ 0);' '{. - ~-" Ij,,<t> 'L' e:; -----'----- <::!. iT, .-.J ,/ ~I ., 3 Q I~(, U"\ I ... ,>; - IQ( 45 .:.....f ". ~ 50 13/'2 I .;; /s; ,. .~ 9 . 8 Ij ,l~ I I '" ,.... .... . I - 45 66 SOil 4-5 ." bb 501/ 4S 45 b6 50 'T~ f -~---- ----- -r- '-~.._ ,,_. . -"~-- I 66 .3 4 5 6 3 a:r.: c-; ,..~, -v- '"' '=' - '=' rn lr. ,..... !: .:; ...; or ~ <0 '" ..., ..., ~ ~ - I. I - ,,-.. t 45 ::1 .. ., t1"..: ~ 71 6 Z2 ~ Co /30 c !.30 "" , ~ '. '" 7 U) .:J. "" ..., U'l " } ... '=' 8 <:> ;, ;.v.,~. ;"!S'7 I ~;L11 U) 8 ~ 0 29 c ~- 5. 9 --- J.'~7 '" ~ 9 0 , S 9 :i: r: I . 2- n', '. 2 e ' '" , : /0 ~ J) _~LllO 0 10. ..j. I :1.6 I ? i .. q 27 , II , . ~ I I; Ii " 129. os , $ 26 r .. 12 r2 !2 :.r: I :r .. I- 13 to , .. f I- ~ : i4 14 co <:1 , " J : "J I 15 0 , I ,rl , (;6 I 16 I 0 I .,.., c, , -.7 ..., , 17" - fI'! ! .., . <:> 0 -, <:> ;'" 121', .,., f 36 . 17 "l pO .. 0 SO. \t.. ,,:., . /8 66 '" .~\:. Q ~ <..5;1 - " j- .. . J J,j nesteod 66 ,..,.'-\ -.., ~ \ j <Q '" \ \ " \ \ \ ''1 I ." leopohS /~4 "" \ '" r--- -- - - - - ~ PLA T l\IAP ======- - CITY OF ~ ~ May 29, 2002 Council Report 02-90 HOPKINS . VARIANCE-FRONT YARD SETBACK Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to approve Resolution 02-48A, recommending denial for a 4,5-foot, front yard variance at 101 Interlachen Road. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Mr. Thompson moved and Ms. Halverson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZO 1-19, recommending approval for at 4.5- foot, front yard variance at 101 Interlachen Road. The motion was approved on a 5-0 vote. Mr. Rudolph abstained. Approval of Resolution 02-48B will approve the vanance. Overview. The Planning Commission at their October meeting first heard this variance request. The variance was continued because the Planning Commission is considering amending the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission continued the variance to June to see if the zoning amendments are approved. At the May 21 City Council meeting the City Council did not approve the amendments and referred the issue back to the Commission for review. There is also proposed to be a joint meeting on July 9th. The porch issue wil1 be a topic on the agenda. Staff would still recommend denial of the variance. . The applicants are requesting a variance for 4,5 feet to allow the constmction of a front porch. The zoning ordinance requires a 20-foot front yard setback for front porches in residential districts. The home is situated on the comer of Interlachen Road and Boyce Road, The Zoning Ordinance defines the front yard of a comer lot to be the side of the lot with the shortest frontage. In this case, lnterlachen Road is the front yard and Boyce Road is the side yard. Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property? . What does the ordinance require? . What are the specifics of the applicants' request? . What special circumstances or hardship does the property have? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportin2 Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Site Plan . Resolution 02-48A . Resolution 02-48B . Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: - Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: ..- CR02-90 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider, . What is the zoning of the property? The subject property is zoned R-I-C, Medium Density Single Family. . What does the ordinance require? The ordinance requires a 20-foot front yard setback for a front porch. . What are the specifics of the applicants ~ request? The applicant has requested a variance of 4.5 feet to allow a 15.5-foot front yard setback. . What special circumstances or hardship does the property have? The Zoning Ordinance states the following: a variance is a modification or variation from the provisions of this code granted by the board and applied to a specific parcel of property because of undue hardship due to circumstances peculiar and unique to such parcel. The Zoning Ordinance also states the following: that the Commission must find that the literal enforcement of the provision of the Zoning Ordinance would cause an . undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and that the granting of a variance to the extent necessary to compensate for said hardship is in keeping with the intent of this code. The applicants stated in their application the following: Strict enforcement of the ordinance does not cause undo hardship or reasonable use of the property. The applicants stated that they do not have a hardship for the granting of a variance. The subject site is not unique. If the variance is granted the home will have a 15.5- foot front yard setback. The zoning ordinance was amended a few years ago to allow a lesser setback for front porches. Before the ordinance was amended, this zoning district would have required a front porch or any other addition in the front to have a 3D-foot front yard setback. The home as it exists today does not have the required front yard setback. Attached is a copy of the topographic map of the area with the applicants' home indicated. As the map indicates, the homes to the south of the applicants' property are approximately the same setback. If this variance is granted, the applicants' addition will be closer to the street than the other homes on the block. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the variance and why it brought before the Commission again. . Jerome and Kim Fons, the applicants, appeared before the Commission, They stated that they had done improvements to the house and this will add to the house. The Commission discussed open porches and closed porches. Ms. Anderson noted that there would be a joint meeting with the City Council on July 9, and one of the topics for discussion would be the porch issue. CR02-90 . Page 3 Alternatives. 1. Approve the variance. By approving the variance, the applicant will be able to constmct the addition as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, Resolution 02-48B should be adopted. 2. Deny the variance. By denying the variance, the applicant will not be able to constmct the addition as proposed. If this alternative is considered Resolution 02-48A should be adopted, 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued, . . ....:..r_~...-io-..:.J.tX~~cl;. ...J,_~ I --.' -,. - - -- -- .- - -- - ~ ---..- - -- l!.J % I::) , ....... . IQ ....... ~ . ------- '--- - )J '-' ~81 X 906. ~I>\ lr - l~ <0 @J l l ~1 ~~I\I 1"'Q'-11~1 ~ I < ~ h ~ Z \___ ~" ~ <l _~11\,- ~~"" ~ A' <l<l~~ ~ ~ ') J w - S .., ~ L. <Ii ~ I <;y \ ---- L: ~" ",\ lC 1 ~ I ~ <l "' I [~:] 88 9\6.\ h ~'rTR' ~p .~~'" " ~ ....; I g y--~'" l~ L ~~ ~ 1)' ~I ,\ rr 7" /. I _ _ %CJ ~ "'~ . ?02.000 M "S: ( @ ~ ..---' ~ ~ I ~ " -~ ,,~of / \ 7 "- "~ X 925.9 1 l 15' _ . ;.f~~ ,,\ ~ J " . i~j) I (i ~/~ \~J9I~}8 Yr ' 928.4 " ~~_:::\ ( ~ (U X - - 9\5. f ~ 'J!'" .\ '-/ ~ P;='=t- .:::^<" ~), ~H____ 'l'/~<-I"~'7'~ ~"" "~I\" ~~ J~ X'~' , ~ V ~~ 911.5 -V- i' 1 ~ T ~_ - ~"i-'~ rf- - .910 . r-r;;.,.4~ ~~. " c ~ .J~::::;; . <" -< r, ;r~ :6Y ~ I "' ~ r .J - " ,w~ ;; T1 ~"'" V,0j-, ~, (J ~ ?i?~" .~ U ;G~~":~ ~:~ ' ~ ~ "I p" - -" ~ <r~9- J ~~./~ -) 901.5X~_ . ?01.500N I J _ ~ ~ <[-- J ~ ?ill · "'" ~." -, ~ '1'"" ~ "J ~ :,\" ~ r ij" " 1'7J' ~ ~ L--- '<l '> ~ W~ r It ~ ~;;;" I" I I///nn ~~ 0 C{. J.. ... . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 02-48A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF F ACT AND DENYING A FOUR AND ONE-HALF FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE WHEREAS, an application for Variance VNOl-4 has been made by Jerome and Kimberly Fons; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a variance was made by Jerome and Kimberly Fans on October 1, 2001; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notice, held a meeting on the application and reviewed such application on October 30, 2001 and May 28, 2003: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; . 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: Lots 1 and 2 and the north 1/2 of Lot 3, Slack 5 F.A. Savage's Interlachen Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Variance VNOl-4 is hereby denied based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the property does not have a hardship for the granting of the variance. Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. Eugene]. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: . Terry Obermaier, City Clerk . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 02-48B RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROViNG A FOUR AND ONE-HALF FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE WHEREAS, an application for Variance VNOl-4 has been made by Jerome and Kimberly Fans; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a variance was made by Jerome and Kimberly Fans on October 1,2001; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notice, held a meeting on the application and reviewed such application on October 30, 2001 and May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; . 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: Lots 1 and 2 and the north Y2 of Lot 3, Block 5 FA Savage's Interlachen Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Variance VNOl-4 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That a permissible extension of structural open-air eaves over the minimum front yard setback is not an intrusion upon the front yard setback and a denial of such intrusion constitutes a hardship under the ordinance. Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. Eugene 1. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: . Terry Obermaier, City Clerk I , ........~"-"-,-- }....' f~cP ~ ~ XIST/NG ~.J!v::z.~e ~ tll - d:: )( \i ~ ill n \ l - .. -- ---- - ~ ----------------- --- - ... f I~ .t>rc-r.s &L> r P-CJ/V'r /C?~c;r:I - H~(:)re,.r<.7"1"" - LltVG 3 , f:'t;UiVD IP-pp 100 I ~ S' IT E rL/'N \:$ - .. ~-- ~~ 1's 41 -= I ! D 1I - FONS .RES/.De-Nee' - . - . "-- 1 I r- \ / ~~ -~ -- - z: r c If .--- ........ 1 - I r F Ie 0 IV T Ei L ~ V A T /0 N Yt II 0(; / '- 0 II CITY OF ~ ~ ~~ .. i . HOPKINS May 29, 2002 Council Report 02-91 REZONING- REGENCY PUD Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 02-49, approving Ordinance 02-877. rezoning the Regency development to PUD for first reading. At the Zoning and Plmming meeting, Ms. Allen moved and Ms. Hatcher seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ02-l3, recommending approval of Ordinance 02-877, rezoning the Regency development to PUD. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. The applicant, The Beard Group, is proposing to construct a residential development on the parking lots of Alliant Tech, north of Second Street N,E. These parking lots are currently zoned R-I-A, single and two-family high density, and R-1-C, single-family medium density. This residential development is proposed to consist of 38 townhomes and 28 single-family homes. The single-family homes will have a lot size similar to north Hopkins and have the appearance of an historic home. Some of the homes will have front porches, and the garages will be in the rear. . Developing this parking area will affect the reuse of the former Alliant Tech building to the south. Eliminating parking for the building will require a use that requires less parking. Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the Comprehensive Plan designation and what is the zoning the subject site? . What does the Planned Unit Development zoning allow? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportin2. Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Site Plan . Resolution 02-49 . Ordinance 02-877 Nanc . Anderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: YIN - Source: . Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: . ,. CR02-91 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the Comprehensive Plan designation and what is the zoning the subject site? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Residential. The parking lots are currently zoned R-I-A, single and two-family high density and R-I-C, single-family medium density, The underlying zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation will remain. . What does the Planned Unit Development zoning allow? The Plmmed Unit Development zoning allows a site-specific development with the underlying zoning remaining. This type of development allows for a departure from the strict application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allowed uses, and performance standards for each PUD are delineated in the agreement. In this case the underlying zoning of residential will remain, but the density, setbacks and lot sizes do not meet the underlying zoning standards. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson gave a brief overview of the development. Bill Beard, Paul Gamst, and Chris . Enger appeared before the Commission. Mr. Beard and Mr. Enger gave an overview of the development. Mr. Beard reviewed the changes in the site plan since the last meeting. Rob Healy, Steve Shaw, Firmus Opitz, Bob Shaw, Al Krattley, and Roy Hogge appeared before the Commission. All spoke against the rezoning of the overlay PUD zoning. Altern atives. 1. Approve the rezoning, By approving the rezoning, the applicant will be able to construct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the rezoning. By denying the rezoning, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. . . . . . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: R02-49 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING OF AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE REGENCY DEVELOPMENT TO PUD WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment ZN02-6 has been made by The Beard Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment was made by The Beard Group; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staffwere considered. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendment ZN02-6 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the underlying zoning ofR-I-A and R-I-C remain. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Zoning Amendment ZN02-G is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval of the plat of the subject property. 2. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval of the conditional use permit for the proposed development. 3. That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreement that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD development. Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. . Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk ., CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO, 02-877 AN ORDINANCE REZONING AN OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the present zoning classification of R-I-A and R-I-C, upon the following described premises remains as the underlying zoning, and in the said premises is hereby overlaid as a Planned Unit Development. Lots 1, 2, 22, 23, and 24, Block 1; and Lots 1 and 2 except the west 25 feet thereof; and the east half of that part of Lot 3, lying East of the West 25 feet thereof; and Lots 23 and 24 except the easterly 25 feet thereof; Block 2 all in Stevens Oakwood Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. First Reading: June 4, 2002 . Second Reading: June 18,2002 Date of Publication: June 26, 2002 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: July 17, 2002 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attomey Signature Date . .May 30, 2002 ~ Council Report 02-92 ,< I-iOPK1NS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - REGENCY . Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 02-50, approving a conditional use permit to construct 38 carriage homes and 28 single-family homes. At the Zoning and PlaIU1ing meeting, Ms. Hatcher moved and Ms. Allen seconded to adopt Resolution RZ02-l4, recommending approval of a conditional use permit to construct 38 caITiage homes and 28 single-family homes. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview, The applicant, The Beard Group, is proposing to construct a residential development on the fonner parking lots of Alliant Tech, north of Second Street N.E. These parking lots are currently zoned R-I-A, single and two-family high density, and R-I-C, single-family medium density. This residential development is proposed to consist of 38 carriage homes and 28 single- family homes. The single-family homes will have a lot size similar to lots in north Hopkins and have the appearance of an historic home. Some of the homes will have front porches, and the garages will be in the rear. Since the concept review, the applicant has removed two carriage homes abutting Monroe A venue. Developing this parking area will affect the reuse of the former Alliant Tech building to the . south. Eliminating parking for the building will require a use that requires less parking. Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? . What are the specifics of the homes? . What are the specifics of the development? . What is the schedule for development? . What is the plan for the fonner Alliant Tech building? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportin2 Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Site Plans . Neighborhood meeting minutes . Memo from Mark Koegler . Memo from Steve Bot and Steve Stadler . Resolution 02-50 i ~ n Nanclf ' Anderson, AICP . Planner Financial Impact: $_ N/ A Budgeted: Y/N Source: ~ Related Documents (eIF, ERP, etc.): Notes: - .-- --- . . CR02-92 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is R-l-C and R-1-A. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this Residential. The density, lot size, and setbacks proposed are not consistent with the zoning. The applicant is proposing to PUD the development. A PUD allows a relaxation of the zoning requirements. An overlay rezoning to PUD will be required for this development to proceed. . What are the specifics of the homes? The single-family homes will be two-story with a basement. Without the basement finished the homes have three bedrooms with 2.5 baths. The basement can be finished as a recreation room, bedroom and another bathroom. There are six styles of homes that can be chosen and each style will come with four exterior options. The town homes will be two-story with a basement. The townhomes will have three floor plans, all with three bedrooms and baths. The homes range in size from 1,595 to 1,947 square feet. All townhomes will have a two-car garage. . . What are the specifics of the development? Parking A garage fulfills the requirement for parking for single-family homes. Each single-family home will have a garage. The townhomes are required to have two spaces per unit. Each carriage home will have two parking spaces with the garage. The will be parking available in the driveways for both the single-family homes and carriage homes. The applicant has requested that there is parking on the streets including Second Street. Access Access to the area will be mostly from the existing roads of Monroe, Jackson and Van Buren Avenues. There will be an additional road constructed east of Van Buren. There will be alleys for access to the garages for the single-family homes and a motor court for the townhomes to access the garages. Sidewalk There will be sidewalks along Second Avenue, Monroe, Jackson, Van Buren, Tyler, and the . private street. Setbacks The development is proposed to be a PUD. The PUD zoning allows flexibility in the CR02-92 Page 3 . setbacks. Staff did ask the applicant to move the units abutting Second Street N.E. to the north to allow a greater setback and green area. The setback range for the single-family and carriage homes are the following: Single-Family Homes Front yard 16-17 feet Side yard 5-8 feet Rear yard 14-20 feet Carriage Homes Front yard 1 3 - 1 7 feet Side yard 7-22 feet Rear yard 14-20 feet Public Works The City's Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan received for the Regency Residential Development dated May 10, 2002. The following are the comments. The plan must be revised to incorporate these comments and resubmitted to the City. . General Comments and PUD Al!reement Requirements . In accordance with the Hopkins Engineering Guidelines, a contractor's guarantee with bonding and all pertinent City testing requirements are required on this project and should be specified. . The developer shall further warrant all improvements done within the City right-of- way for a period of two years. . A Registered Civil Engineer must sign the Civil Drawings before the City can grant approval. . A park dedication fee will be required for this project. . Ten-foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to all City streets must be shown on the plat, properly recorded and granted to the City of Hopkins by the developer. . Requested road right-of-way at the northeast corner of Jackson Avenue and St. Louis Street and at the northwest corner of Tyler Avenue and St. Louis Street must be properly recorded and granted to the City of Hopkins by the developer. . On street parking recommendations for Second Street and the avenues as per memo dated May 30,2002 from Steve Bot and Steve Stadler. . The developer shall agree to, and be required to inform all buyers within this development of the fact that the proposed 2003-2007 City of Hopkins Capital Improvement Program has identified all roads adjacent to this development as potentially needing reconstruction within the next five years. Further, the buyers shall initial that they are aware of this potential reconstruction and recognize that their . property win be subject to assessments per the City's assessment policy for such reconstruction. Such recognition by the buyer does not waive any of their rights to public hearings and assessment appeals as regulated by Minnesota State Statute Chapter 429. ---..- CR02-92 Page 4 . . The developer shall agree to reimburse the City for consultant personnel fees not to exceed $30,000, associated with inspection assistance for this project due to the limited in-house inspection personnel employed by the City for a project of a large magnitude such as this one. . All paved surfaces and utilities leading to and within the development shall be private, with the City assuming no responsibility for any installation or maintenance costs of these facilities. . A lighting plan sheet should be included with the City submittals showing what new lighting is proposed as well as what is planned for the existing lighting. Please include lighting details on this sheet. . Numerous regulatory permits are required for this project including but not limited to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MCES, and MPCA (NPDES, etc). . The plans should clearly state that the project contractor will be responsible for all utility locates and Gopher State one-call requirements. . Develop a signing plan for this project. Signing to designate parking restriction areas along adjacent streets and other misc. project signing such as one-way roads, dead end barricades, and stop signs should be shown on this plan. . Two project signs should be specified in accordance with standard detail DGN-4. . A detailed traffic control and detour plan must accompany any City street closure submittal. . Sheet C2 - Erosion Control Plan . Silt fence must be added to any area that slopes away from the site including the steep slope between Tyler and Van Buren Avenues. Sheet C3 - Demolition Plan . The two existing pedestrian crossing systems including signal, controller, signage, and all related items shall be salvaged as directed by the City traffic division and delivered to the Hopkins Public Works Department located at 11100 Excelsior Boulevard. Crosswalk striping at these locations shall also be removed with the project. . Any existing water lines on the development must be removed back to the watermain. . Concrete walk and curb to be removed shall be clearly labeled. It is likely that curb sections along Second Street N.E. will need to be replaced in conjunction with the construction activities on the proj ect, this possibility should be mentioned and attempted to be identified and planned for in the project plans. . Notes on this page seem to be shifted or misplaced, which makes the item unclear Please clearly identify the area each note applies to. . CR02-92 Page 5 . Sheet C4,C5.C6 - Gradin2 and Draina2e Plan . Construction limits for the project should be shown on the plan so the impact can be clearly understood. . All street cuts shall be sawcut, replaced in kind, and the joints crack sealed. Sawcut lines need to be shown correctly on the plan to include utility work areas. . Identify and label all pedestrian ramp locations on the plan. . All private road entrances shall be constructed in accordance with Hopkins standard detail STR T -5 A. The entrance to each private drive must include design features that clearly differentiate it from a public street such as concrete apron or different paving material. . Pavement areas and typical pavement sections need to be revised to meet City Fire Lane standards of 3.5" Bituminous and 8" Class 5. Individual driveways may be 3" Bituminous and 6" Class 5. . All curb and gutter along City streets shall be B618 and private road, parking lot, or driveway curb may be either B6IS, B612, or surmountable per Hopkins standard detail STRT-l. . Curb lines should run down perpendicular to all driveways to give the water a flowline gutter to travel within (see standard detail STR T -6). . A qualified professional engineer registered in the State of Minnesota shall design the retaining wall s, and a fence shall be installed along the top of all walls 4 feet or taller. . As identified in the soils report, draintile and sump pumps must be installed in all . units. These sump pumps and all roof leaders shall be designed to discharge over grass before entering the storm sewer system. Details of the draintile and sump pump design shall be included with the plan. . Because of grade issues, the stormwater treatment proposed in the far east area of the development is very limited and a stormceptor or other BMP should be designed and installed along the storm sewer system for this area where it will do the most overall good. . CB#2 should connect into the existing storm sewer manhole in the boulevard located directly SW ofCB#2 instead of into Ex. CB#l. . Design a concrete curb swale w/riprap for any areas where water is to drain through the curb or off the end of a roadway into a rain garden area. . Identify and obtain any temporary construction easements needed to build the proposed plan, including grade sloping, retaining wall/fence installation, and landscaping. . Clearly label all project curb including "gutter out" areas. . A retaining wall appears to be needed along the far north property line located just west ofYan Buren Avenue. . The townhome driveways located just west of Jackson A venue need to have more grade to drain away from the garage. . Precautions need to be taken for the lawn sprinkler system and designed to minimize the risk of additional runoff into the storm sewer system. . A low point appears to have been mistakenly added to the driveway road for the . eastern set of townhomes located just next to the far west townhome in this area. ---_.-- - --..-" CR02-92 Page 6 . . The south rain garden overflow of 918.6 for the far east townhome area allows no room for an emergency overflow without great risk to the garage area of the adjacent westerly townhomes. Sheet C7 - Utilitv Plan . Each unit will require a separate utility permit without exception. Private utility installation also requires a utility permit from the City and will be required to meet the plumbing code. . At their expense, the developer and/or his contractor shall secure all utility and soils tests which are to be performed by a certified testing company as requested by the City and/or required within the City Engineering Guidelines. Copies of test results must always be provided to the City. . Copies of storm sewef flow and sizing computations must be provided to the City. . Individual water meters fOf each unit must be installed in a designated area where they are all accessible and can easily be read by the City's radio read system. . Stainless steel bolts and megalugs shall be specified for all watermain connections. . Add a gate valve just north of the tee fOf the northern watermain leg between Jackson Avenue and Van Buren Avenue. Sheet C8 - Ceometl'ic and Paving Plan . . Plan symbols and details are incomplete and need to appeaf more clearly on the plan so it is easier to figure out what exactly is proposed for each location and item. . The northern private drive entrance between Jackson Avenue and Van Buren Avenue must be a minimum of24 feet wide. . The 10' trail along the north side of Second Street NE can either be bituminous paved or concrete. Please clearly label the width of this trail. Sheet C9.CIO,Cll - Details . Some of the many details shown on the plan are not in accordance with Hopkins guidelines and standards. The details need to be reviewed, compared, and brought into compliance with the Hopkins standard details. Sheet C12 - Watershed Data . It appears that the table at the bottom of the sheet should be labeled as a "proposed" drainage area instead of "existing". Sheet Ll- Landscape Plan . An infiltration section down to the sand subsoil needs to be designed and proposed fOf the rain garden areas to help ensure maximum infiltration . . The rain garden area located just west of Van Buren Avenue does not contain a rain garden style planting on the landscape plan. CR02~92 Page 7 . . The proposed monuments, fencing, and some proposed plantings at the intersection corners appear that they will create sight distance problems for vehicles. A sight distance analysis will need to be performed and the analysis submitted to the City for reView. . Details for the proposed 6' fence must be provided for City review. . "Norway" is not a winter hardy tree according to the City Forester, and a different species of Maple needs to be proposed for City approval. Excelsior Technical Center LandscaDe Plan . While a full review is not possible until the Civil Drawings are submitted, this concept plan appears to be workable. The Public Works Department reserves the right to continue reviewing any plans submitted for approval and to place new or revised conditions on construction as may be required. All future plan sets must be signed and submitted with revision dates. Landscaping The single family homes to not require any landscaping. The landscape plan does indicate that there will be a tree in the front yard of the single-family homes and a tree in the rear area. In addition to the trees planted, there will be plantings around the foundation of the . homes. The carriage homes require one tree for every 2000 square feet of open space. The carriage home area between Monroe and Jackson requires 12 trees and the area between the new road and Tyler requires 10 trees. The landscape plan indicates 30 of the required size trees between Tyler and the new road. There are 31 of the required size plantings on the carriage home area between Jackson and Monroe. In addition to the required plantings there are additional plantings around the foundation of the carriage homes and in the rain gardens abutting the homes. In several areas in the development there will be rain gardens with plantings. The entire site will be irrigated, and the association will maintain the landscaping. The landscaping plan also indicates a six-foot high fence along the north property line. The applicant has contacted the abutting property owners to receive input on landscape plan. The applicant is proposing monuments at all corners on Second Street. The monuments are proposed to be brick pillars with a low fence. These monuments will have to meet the visibility requirements. The neighborhood meeting minutes indicate that there would be 12-foot evergreens on Monroe and Tyler edges screening the motor courts from the street. Since the meeting, the landscape architect indicated that the areas proposed to have the larger evergreens are wetter and the evergreens will not do well. The applicant has stated that because of this situation . the edges will be landscaped with other planting; however, they still will screen the motor court area. Staff has asked the applicant to submit a new landscape plan for review of these areas with the additional screening. CR02-92 Page 8 . Exterior The carriage homes will have a combination of brick and vinyl siding. There will be a precast stone block on the base of the carriage homes. The rear of the carriage homes will have a precast stone base element from the front and side around to the back. The exterior material will be a vinyl siding in the rear with a divider strip to appear as separate homes. Each carriage home will have a deck off the rear constructed of permanent white deck material and white clad metal for railings. Dormers will be added to the rear roof to break up the building. The applicant is planning on vinyl siding, shakes and brick for the exterior of the single- family homes. There will be six different styles of homes and each style will have four different choices of exteriors. Park Area The site plan indicates a park area on the north end of the new road. This park will have a patio with a pergola. There will also be landscaping in the park area. Trash . The carriage homes and the single-family homes will have individual trash pick-up. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and noted that there will be additional hydrants required and that the turn around in the alley must meet the Fire Marshal's his specifications. Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by residential to the north, industrial the south, residential to the east and industrial to the west. . What is the schedule for development? The construction is proposed to start in the fall of 2002 and starting occupancy in the spring of 2003. . What is the plan for the former Alliant Tech building? The reuse of the former AlIiant Tech building is dependent on the parking. Because the northerly parking area will be developed, a less intense use will have to occupy the building. The applicant is aware that parking is an issue and the City will not allow uses that will . exceed the parking that exists on the site. The applicant is proposing that the west side of the building will be a bulk warehouse area, the middle section will be a storage/warehouse area and there will be an office area along the CR02-92 Page 9 . front of the building and on the east side of the building. There will be an area on the east side ofthe building that will be razed for additional parking. The applicant is also proposing to add landscaping to the site along the west, north, east, and a part of the south site. The applicant will also be connecting the sidewalk at the comer of Tyler and Second Street to the regional trail system by including a new sidewalk along the east side of St. Louis Street. There is also a proposed sidewalk along the south side of Second Street. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms, Anderson gave an overview of the development. Bill Beard, Paul Gamst, and Chris Enger appeared before the Commission, Mr. Beard and Mr. Enger gave an overview of the development. Bob Shaw, Rob Healy, and Firrnus Opitz spoke at the public hearing against the development. Mr. Beard has requested that there be parking on the avenues and Second Street. There was a discussion about whether parking should be allowed on the avenues and Second Street. The Commission placed a condition in the resolution and is recommending parking on Second Street and the avenues as per the staff recommendation. Alternatives. 1, Approve the conditional use permit to constmct the development as proposed. By . approving the conditional use permit, the applicant will be able to construct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the conditional use permit to construct the development. By denying the conditional use permit, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed. If the Planning Commission considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this altemative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued, . -- -- -- - - - - -- . I Hopkins Public Works Department I Memorandum TO: Nancy Anderson, City Planner COPY: Tom Cesare, BKBM Engineers Bill Beard, The Beard Group Chris Enger, Ryland Homes Rick Davidson, Building Official Vem Pankratz, Street Superintendent FROM: Steven G. Bot, Assistant City Engineer Steven J. Stadler, Director of Public Works DATE: May 30, 2002 SUBJECT: Regency Residential Development . City of Hopkins Public Works On- street Parking Review and Recommendation . In response to the letter to Bill Beard from Chris Enger with Ryland Homes, dated May 13,2002 and based on comments received at the Hopkins Planning Commission meeting in regards to on-street parking for the Regency Development, the Hopkins Public Works Department has reviewed the existing and potential parking situation and has developed the following recommendations: . No parking should be posted and enforced for a minimum of 40 feet from all public street intersection corners in order to ensure proper sight distance. . 2nd Street NE: Parking should be allowed for a posted and enforced 2 hour maximum period of time along the north side of 2nd Street N.E. from Tyler Avenue to Monroe Avenue from Sam to 6pm, Monday thru Saturday, to remain consistent with other limited area parking and to limit the potential for on-street business parking in the area. A venue Parking Recommendations: While the parking we are recommending along the A venues is basically consistent with the restrictions that currently exist (as was requested by the neighborhood residents) we feel that removing some ofthese restrictions may be appropriate once full redevelopment of the former Alliant Tech and SuperValu North Annex sites are complete. As a result, we further recommend that the parking restrictions along the . Avenues be reviewed again in two and five years based on the anticipated progress and completion of those redevelopment projects. - .- - - . . . Tyler Avenue N: No parking po stings and enforcement should remain as is along the east side. Existing 2 hour restricted parking should remain in place along the west side and should be extended south, adjacent to the Regency development area. . Jackson and VanBuren Avenue N: The existing 2 hour parking restrictions along the northern parts of these avenues should remain and should be extended south, adjacent to the regency development. . Monroe Avenue N: We recommend that no changes to the existing parking restrictions along Momoe Avenue be made due to its narrow width and the fact that no properties from the Regency Development will directly abut the roadway. Please keep in mind that these recommendations cover only on-street parking on the public streets and that parking and signage on the private streets within the development must still be reviewed and approved by the City as we need to ensure proper traffic and emergency vehicle flow within the development which could be jeopardized depending on the parking that is proposed. Because the recommended revisions are adjacent to the development, these parking and signing adjustments should be incorporated into the signing plan for the development. . I hope this memo has provided you with the information you need. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this memo or if you need any additional information. . ...---- . . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: R02-50 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF F ACT AND APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT THE REGENCY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP02-4 has been made by The Beard Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a conditional use permit was made by The Beard Group on May 9, 2002; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; . 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 1, 2, 22, 23, and 24, Block 1; and Lots 1 and 2 except the west 25 feet thereof; and the east half of that part of Lot 3, lying East of the West 25 feet thereof; and Lots 23 and 24 except the easterly 25 feet thereof; Block 2 all in Stevens Oakwood Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit CUP02-4 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the proposed use meets the requirements for a conditional use permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Conditional Use Permit CUP02-4 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. In accordance with the Hopkins Engineering Guidelines, a contractor's guarantee with bonding and aJ I pertinent City testing requirements are required on this project and should be specified . 2. The developer shall further warrant all improvements done within the City right-of-way for a period of two years. . 3. A Registered Civil Engineer must sign the Civil Drawings before the City can grant approval. 4. A park dedication fee is required for this project. 5. That all comments of the Public Works Department as outlined in the memo dated May 21, 2002 shall be met and addressed in future submittals. 6. The Public Works Department reserves the right to continue reviewing any plans submitted for approval and to place new or revised conditions on construction as may be required. All future plan sets must be signed and submitted with revision dates. 7. Ten-foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to all City streets must be shown on the plat, properly recorded and granted to the City of Hopkins by the developer. 8. Requested road right-of-way at the northeast comer of Jackson Avenue and St. Louis Street and at the northwest corner of Tyler A venue and St. Louis Street must be properly recorded and granted to the City of Hopkins by the developer. 9. That on street parking is allowed on Second Street and the avenues as per the memo dated May 30, 2002 from Steve Bot and Steve Stadler. 10. The developer shall agree to, and be required to inform all buyers within this development of the fact that the proposed 2003-2007 City of Hopkins Capital Improvement Program has identified all roads adjacent to this development as potentially needing reconstruction within the next five years. Further, the buyers shall initial that they are aware of this potential reconstruction and recognize that their property will be subject to assessments pef the City's assessment policy for such reconstruction. Such recognition by the buyer does not waive any of their rights to public hearings and . assessment appeals as regulated by Minnesota State Statute Chapter 429. 11. The developer shall agree to reimburse the City for consultant personnel fees not to exceed $30,000, associated with inspection assistance for this project due to the limited in-house inspection personnel employed by the City for a project of a large magnitude such as this one. 12. All paved surfaces and utilities leading to and within the development shall be private with the City assuming no responsibility for any installation or maintenance costs of these facilities. 13. A lighting plan sheet should be included with the City submittals showing what new lighting is proposed as well as what is planned for the existing lighting. Please include lighting details on this sheet. 14. Numerous regulatory permits are required for this project including but not limited to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Health, MCES, and MPCA (NPDES, etc). 15. The plans should clearly state that the project contractor will be responsible for all utility locates and Gopher State one-call requirements. 16. Develop a signing plan for this project. Signing to designate parking restriction areas along adjacent streets and other misc. project signing such as one-way roads, dead end barricades, and stop signs should be shown on this plan. 17. Two project signs should be specified in accordance with standard detail DGN-4. 18. A detailed trat1ic control and detour plan must accompany any City street closure submittal. . 19. That the final plans must indicate the additional fire hydrants required and that the turn _ around in the alley must meet the Fire Marshal's specifications. --.- ----- . .. . 20. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. 21. That the edges of Monroe and Tyler will be screened with plantings to screen motor courts from streets. The applicant will submit a new site plan that will be approved by staff 22. That the entrance monuments on the corners meet the visibility requirements. 23. That the proposed fence specifications must be submitted, and the fence must meet the zoning requirements Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. Eugene 1. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk . . .- N\f1d ~NI^,"d 'l? ~1~U.3Vi'~3~ GJ - ~. ~ \ W ~\...~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.,--- _ _ _ ~:1) \...... - - - - - - - - - _ _ ~"'" --.::'f" f, ~-~- ......-- = :II<:I.L S aN;:; - rDtt Z \ 'i ~~I \ ' \0 ~~I \~ ~~ llP 0\ 11 \ ~\ ~ ~~ \~ \ ~\ 1",- \ i \' \ \ ~\ I ~ \ \ :< \ \ :< \ "~!'j.'1 . , \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ . \ . DRAW VlCINfTY MAP- HOPKlNS. MINNESOTA CT TITLE SHEET . .w ,,,-, ........... ',.... 'n,.,,,,. .... ," ..,~.= ""::il""o . Ci TOPOGRAPHI " ."",-!-.-. ..I"~; y.....,.~ _1~bllSr..f$.!.;'";' .,<.......\\'..... .. ";01.~': ":>~ ''''.' ~ '. I ru" .' ....,~, L,.""- \&.ni \\llJ.~ 11 ~lll"jOb!l[Mri!'.sr.'^""7 . ,.J 1 ., ' ,~,$~"""""'f..))~.:~,,~....j , . ,...........,............ml.j.~ Ii.; !'. .'~t.:l',.'F'<"r'"d'''r]J'"Wi"f C2 EROSION COI ,/.....,J >~~9i s.:$~~!,i$All:; ~;: """'I""'r' ! "w31s;'Sj"j ...1;;';) C3 DEMOLITION i " '~I'" .......il ."'!....4iil'1irDbl>~",........ ~~9..", 1.1 ..,...........l... .. li/jj; .~.+l:l'........ vd :2,' /t~.,,-_.~.'-'l ill!~::..... i,l:t.. ) ,\,. ,...' ~5 } .'>It ~ ~. rd. ' C4 GRADING & C . j . ._~\l>I\\<&S}....~.,y..,N""^""r=,."<e;'''i!i...'".I'''\Mlnn.'~~..,~ "\"'f-lr~~ k. C5 GRADING & C ..... tI\\l"~1 \ i""'-'~',)./.-l!J' '-' '..,'Cr- '" r'. ."'~}.. . . ""=~~':::L., j .', ~!''1O'''''''''ili hi!, i ;-.,' ".'. u"!''''(,'~.,....'lt. ,'; . i,. C6 GRADING&C P Jil" -"-' ~ ~_..._,.,., ''*--,.,. "':' , >, ~~rL~ 'fA f' '~"""""';'"" ;~,. i .:..J!!j W ::!51h"St ,. C7 UTILITY PlAN /h {..... ' .f./"" .(."..... ::w .;.. '~(I>?t ....i~ ' , ; i I i.ll-. ::r".t :J.. \ .-', ~:..!!!!!"l;Il ". ,ID....., , i>.,....'.;o"ll.L.,J..,.. ..,..,. C8 GEOMETRIC l .. ';!';l>',! ''It:.. !I1~'-'"JJ''''' ; I I , "'~ jO. 0 .~ .... 'q..Cr "'if .. h, h. '.~ - I "/"> "'M'!>>;; C9 DET.A1LS S',,) "~T~< ,......-...i1 1;;.3/,..). <-.f!' i -"'-"""'-~""i""if., .1L <\~,/ ~~;-""-'""1b>1_._.... ". t~.L.. il"" L.... ,. ::'J.';,..,,-J~.~~, ~,I...J....\t; {ll. ;!ihi ';?'er. ~.;t""", ~0ilJ1,"!" I .'" 1.. ~ ."S ~~~=,,~,,:.~.._,.. .. .~....; Ci0 DETAILS .'m'. f'w-, '''mI' '~"''''''Z)~1*..iii''''''::::.c, !~r f '.t ....... .-'<'.. Cii DET.A1LS .~:::::.: """'-"f ;, '-'." . .. ......~ - ~:~............ .o'f"""'. i..t\. "'_ '\ l'~. ;. "'\" 2q \ -' !.~>;."t..,;"..-" 1'',-..,,_' P')'.1; \. '''''''....1 ~.,....;::..;;_ ',}. '. ~".'" Q' g-",.._, ,1'"t'.........'.'I-.~.l~J. ?;-r \ ,"-...\i; " ;.......!:;.~F \"'. Ci2 WATERSHED .....~ ~ ~ '.. \<l 'i 't ':'Q St,. !.. ,,' 1,\ "~,. .... (_' ...~ . ...... .~~~\' ~. +r~'''r; ... ";,,,j'''~'n';l~; I! ,.14 i 1 ~ .-~?l ... .-' Li SITE LANDSC l. "io,'W<P'~- 1\ :1(1" ,; , ,2nd -t'>> F....,<..J,. Ild $l'Nt! ili~/ .? I , ..it!'........._..-~lt:1f.1..r.....I..t..r H, t1Il ,..,' .......~:-.......j ""'. L2 FOUNDATION 'i";.. ,.~v 'lfl I/!I' I! i;,.., ./: '.,~= '\'$\oll!l'i<lF ". ~fll!S l1a j ,~ ..r"-r-tj-~,... ......lil...st..t..i'.j'<., ~ I ..i....,~ i~"..""~.<"""t"""l"" L3 EXCELSIOR TI \ 'f',,::- (.....~ ~ . Ill! ' i I' ,f. I)"" "':.~' ~., ~;".J.d>'''''-ff''~lfij' i ,. . . , .....1...... ...l . ......m1~..... ..............t. '.. .. 'f'T'1. ....~..,~... .. .. ~m~in . <r"'",!! l I')i ~j i i ,.' .! ! f j ~ii: Sr' I -1"'"'' . '\ :m fl"j .. I . L.J ~~.. '. .. , '..' ..t...........r.'.. ~:=:t~ mMirrf!' ' g '-~'= '-T_f~ ~"f""r'i''';':;'''''':'''"l-~'''~r .:.t:-.~P.~....-'t-+!".. "t..l.. ""j" , ," j-' I, c;l Li u"-:'''>< j6tti SljS "'\ U '. '~in;onA'i~ " i -0 .,k'f</{ "", ".. <1l";S, ... -l~' ..". \.. ,..,_' 0;;:"_'''', ~ --;-'..""", ~;~l'\ <;fl", "'i . 'hi, ~ In lI;.a/JGllflWd ",..-1_ :b ...,... .<"Wi'i<.~.-g",.. .i.LJ!::IT.1li-... .Juin "q 'r""-r:1hih R~ DC .~~~~~fr-~1~!:~ D RESID ,PROJEcrAllEA-_--;:rA ~ D' DT TEL J. >ja<\ ~~ D V oJ / Y:;f>/'~ 't~ ':?"i> NV~t - ~~ ~~~S'NQ~ ri~ lAcnroo;;Pl .. .... J Oal:P.mi.n UQIDT/'T,^-T, ~ ~[l~~~ nl~U1V. MM~C~ ~ '- g ~ ~ ~Q '~ PROJEC .~ .l1.IDI.!llu. Z!IU; ~ ...............-. !!m!, .,.,.' -- "","" u..c. 'lIClO W'. ..... 1._.......... ....lO x"~ _,.,...... ........ ~",,, ~(~ :;;:- .....'" .~ """....... ."" ..r-,;v .".......~ --VCPI"ll _ 1stSlN .......':l'Il ....-""j Ii ~ 1lIIlI<, --.:;..... -- ~'1"'.... ,~ S ~~""- :::: ........... "'"". 'lO.. "'- ""'- ....... ~ lai._,,,,,,,,," s"""w :::- '. \)\....v' .....;""";,,'-~..... ~.:::= 0>>\10 ............ ....."".Ji:i. '""- 10", lIlJ..... = <;\r "......-r.,~ 6(~d ~ / _.......L..="""..",,,:;sP. .... '"11I_ ~ "..,. . r... ,-. 0 ~, ...,..... _n 1010" ...... """- ...... .... AL TA/ACSM Land ~,., Title Survey ,.,14..0 HOPKINS MAIN~ I I ~ -.. c.-' I c.-" I ~ ' I I Rl C (S'nglo Fern;:, ROE'd.n'" I ~ I ~ I L;1 V L_ I ~ ~ I . I I~---I--- - ~I I 30 I I~ I~ - <~ ;UU1 .11.17 ,"6." -- I ~\\\\""" J 1 \ ^ I c..- .... " -,- f\ A I I\. I "I r- ^ r V V L_ ~ I I V I I I ~ I ~ C_ ,-, : N .BENCHMARK . NOTES TNH (Top Nut at Hydrant) 1. Fee oImple ownership " -UUt top nut af tn. tire h)'drmt located M the aouth .xii of 2nd Street HE ot tho lnt.ersocUon of Monroe Avenue. 2.. NCO of (l(Clpetty Is ~ l Ele...._ 914.20 fect (HOW 29). 3. Prop.rty III --:-- ~~~.t HI C 5. Setback information fro .BASIS OF BEARINGS ..."'~. _lb""'" 50 0 50 100 For the purpOIO' of this BUt'\'e)' the South line 01 Lot 1. Block Fronlo;c Street - 25 feet I I ~:~~n~~n~~=W:~U:ed":"~PQt ::.: ~ ':'11 SCALE IN FEET NB9'J<'SS'E. a. The prop....y has ace.. Scale: 1 Inch - 50 Feet Ncrlh and T)Io" A'o'Cftuo NOt' 7. The oddt'css of tho pro 8. Abo~ ~ound uUlty 10< .LEGEND ~o:;.:. ~ ~rv:)' In~= . - DENOtES ~CIH "MIUAIENT Fwm o - = ~~ENNTO~~~ MARKED ~~~=~~t.d~ LOCATION MAP ~ _ SANITARY SE>lER.......a.E - NOT TO SCALE "" _ H'tORANT UmI 10 - ~...ly all J ~------"r--'---] o. _ STORll SE>lER .......a.E IlcocrIpUon M.... ..ld q I : ~ - ElECTRIC WAhHa..E = ~: ~~ := ""'.. I e-fiij _ CArOl BASH _ I : '" It.... 15 ~ -1'n>p. ~ 1 I pot - DENOTES GAlE VAL\E ~wqclu:c of forfdlel I '/., -I - _ DENOTES WAtER UHf I r.~"-~-~- ,.~-;._- - - DENOTES SANITARY SE'o1EII LtlE i ~ ~ /'f : -- - DENOTES STORU SEWER UHf ~ a . - II: - - DENOTE5 UNDERGROUND EW:1RIC UHf . PROPERTY DESCI ~ I ~ ~I - uo - - ll€NOTE5 UNDERGROUND GAS uHE (^" .... Sd>eduI. _ of C I Xl A'oOU HE I - UT - - DENOTES UNOERc:;RCUND 1UEPttOr.E l.WE 59-8671e. daled _ SECllON 19. TOv.tlSliIP 117, -1- - DENOTES RES1llIClED ACCESS lois 1. 2. 22. 23. on. 24, RANGE 21 ....,.. - DENOTES El..EC1llIC TIWISf"",,EIl IlOX ...1 of Lot 3, ''''Q EooI , HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA l!i _ DENOTES UGH POlE _ 2 dJ ~ 51E\/ENS' I II - DENOTES m.EPH<l<E PEll<STAI. ~ .. DENOTES AIR CONeKnONING,/'tEAllNC UNlT ,;;.\ ~ j" G) ~~~SION CONTROL PLAN DISTURBED AREA IS A ACRES GEOlEXllE Fl..1D FABRIC StALL BE 1NSTAl.UJ) PUl $I..T FENCE. OETAL. ~ WOOD (lII IlETAL ST_ FLTER CAlal _ r_ .- - 2"- IWUJU DlSTAIlCE II(TIfiN POS1S IS 4', AN EXTRA POST YAy BE ADDED ON EAOl SlOE. @~~~SlN SEDIMENT FILTER I I I ~ I 12:; I I I.r I I , . . ~ & ~I I,,~ . I ... '-~.',!."./ (.~-. ;.., ~r~ ~ 'Lll'E' " I"l/-':~' '(' _'\j.-_-_._ I \ . ,,~ 't I 1':"-- .. """'- . "-. ...... __ " '. ". ! .. r..... .~. ~~ ~.~ ~I r' I 30 I r~, ]t. .' Ie ~ ~!I - - ~ - ~ ~ .~ ._----=--- ::::-:::::::=--,;;-~~ : ~ 60,+ illtf l!] I r\\\\\~~~\\\\\"\\\\\\x, Q ~;~OLITION ~LAN DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL NOTES; I. PRIOR TO START Of OflAOUTION. All EROSION AND SEDllIENT CONlRDL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTAllED AND INSPECTED BY MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. i I I'''.'' ~~ 'l""J W Q ~~'NG & DRAINAGE PlAN NOTE: REFER TO DRAWINGS C5 & C6 FOR DETAILED INFORM GRADING SCHEDULE; ~ TOWN HOUES 4" SINGlE f" AIoIIL Y 42" BlIUMINOUS PAVFlAF:NI 1/2" l\l:AR COURSE PER IoIN/OOl 2331 TYPI )12" BINDER COURSE PER IoIN/OOl 2331 1YI 1011/1. CtASS 5 AGGREGATE PER loiN/DOT ; SUBGRAllE: APPRO\1:J) ON SITE SOILS LANDSCAPED ARt: A~ 4" lIJNlMUlI ON SITE ltIPSOIL SUBCRADE: ON SITE SOIlS I I I I I . i I I I I I :::.'. ,-,. I ...; K\'~ I ! I " j , , . II , I , \',11 H' H I .n. _ _ .. _....::'"~'.. -- -..-..-_ --. ~___ _ .. _, 0_.' __.' .. __ .__ ISAN ~ ','.f. ::. ?'..Lz~",.'.....:.'''l''.~'' .:>..:.'!Io'h,,'i,,'~,.~r".~.. ~;o.:. ~~;;~tt._~~~...:!y' R.E.c912.09- ---u;; ---u:; ---w - N.I.E."'90J.57 2~D~ Ij(... k ~:~~~gi:8:- "; -IN. .i.".-901:09 '" - 8" sanitaryse;e; ~ --cw- ~ _~ ~-I.-I-I---t- I- i- TGS llEANS TOP OF STOOP ELE TOF IlEANS TOP OF FOUNOA nO! BFG llEANS FINISHEO GRAOE El BASEII. IlEANS BASEIIENT ELEV Q ~~DING & DRAINAGE PLAN TOP OF FIlUNOA nON (mF) GARAGE SI.AII (05) BASEIIENT Sl.AIl (BASEII.) opE 10 /ILl 51.. :.::--- LO\\t:RED FoonN05 FOR 'MNlER CONSTRUClION @ TOWN HOMES ca NOTTOSCALE ! ----. TQS 920.8 ror 92<lll Brei: 919", Jlo\SE 91l!.3 i~ -- .- - liS 10$ 919.5 Tor 918.7 BfG 917.9 - BASE 911.0 liS 917.9 liS "-. 1IlS.. 911U1 I '--+ T[F 916.Q TOS 922.6lros 922.6 ';m., ~. 1If'[j 917~".... lASt 908.3 "- TlF 921.8 i TeF 921B t TEF BfG!ll!1.O BfG!ll!1.O rBfG Jlo\SE 91B.6j1lAS.E 91ll.lj..... ~ .,..".:,..~-'::"::"'."'" - - 0 .:0_ I ---t- 105 lolEANS lOP OF STOOP ELEVAT TOF MEANS TOP OF FOUNDA nON EI BFG lolEANS FINISHED GRADE ELEVA G) ~~DING & DRAINAGE PLAN BASDA, IAEANS BASEIAENT ELEVAnC lOP OF STOOP TOP OF (ros) FOUNDA nON (TOF) GARAGE SlAIl (GS) BASDAENT SlAIl (BASE"') oPE 10 10 SJ~ LO\\9lED FOOTINGS FOR YolNTER CONSTRucnON G) TOWN HOMES C8 NOT TO SCALE @ ~~:;ITY PLAN KEYED NOTES AU. KE1m NOlES AIlE DENOTED BY 0 (Jj Pl TOP Of STOOP ill lETTAP NEW 6 IlCH Ill' \lAID! SDl\lCE Ino EXIS1IlC 6 IIIQl WAID!IIAIN. SAWCUT_I TOP OF (T05) AU. 1ll1UlllNOUS NECESSARY f1lIl IISTAllA1lOI FOUNOA nON (TOF) ROlO'.f: CCNCllEIE CURS AND CUTlER AT lEA .OiT. RfPI.ACE AU. IlISTURII:D SlJRFACES PI AN/SHED GRADE Of' HCI'KIIS STANDARDS _ SPECf1CAllCNS. ElEVAnON AT COORlIINA IE AU. MlRK W1!H !HE CIlY Of' HOI' BUILDING (6FG) AND TI€ SANITARY SOIlJlIISTAl.1.ElI PRlOll l START Of' talS1R\JCl1llN. BASDAENT SLAB l!I SAWCUT AND IiEIIOIt: AU. IlllUlINOUS NEa:5li GARAGE SlAB (05) (BASDA.) f1lIl SOEIlIISTAllATOI. REIIOIt: CCNCllEIE AND CUTlER AT NEAREST .IOOlT. IlEPI.ACE AI. IlISTURIlEO SlJRFACES PIlI DIY Of' lO'IONS lOImlED STANDARDS _ SPEtn:AnaiS. COORlIINAn WlllK 1I11l TI€ \lAID! 5al\1CE IIlSTAl.1.ElI AN FoonN05 FOR OIY Of' HOI'KINS PIllOR TO START Of' \\INTER CONSTRucnON CONS1R\JCTOI. AU. IIl\A11HWS BE1lIEEll 111I r-25' \lATER 5al\1CE AND 1IlE NEW 5.1H1TARY ~ TO II: R!lI()',{J) AND REPLICED. WlIIli: 1. WAD NIl SANTARY SEllER SER\4CES ARE TO BE ill :\Ic:n::r ~~:e ~?BU= ENTER lHE 9UU.DING fR'OW THE CEN1ER1..JM[ Of' 1I-E ClARAlE _ EXlOO 2~ FEET INTO IH( (g,lllNC. REFER TO Ol:TAlLS 2fC7 AHO 3/C7 AS YIElL , 2. CONlRACTOR IS TO STUB IH( WAIDl >>I) SANITARY CllAIlIiC AND DRAIIAGE PlANS Ol:TAIlS _ I @ TOWN HOMES SDiER SElMCES .3 FEET ABCM: BASD.IDIT SI.AS QtAOE Tl€SE UTU1IES AIlE TO lIE 1IlSTAU.ED PRlOll ELEVATION AND CAP ENOS. IlUI.JlIjG FllOTlHC IlSTAllATOI. r:r NOT TO SCALE 3. WATER SEJMCES ARE TO BE 1-INCH TYPE k COPPER AN) SANITARY SEIER 5EIMCES IS 10 BE m IISTAU. 90 I)[CRfI DIP IIENIl W111l TIIlIIST II 4-lNQl SDll 26 Pvc. .... AU. SERw::ES ARE TO BE A ....-aI.. OF 2 FEET ill IISTAU. 6" . 6" DIP lEI 1II11l TIIlUST 1I.0CIl. aa.ow L.OVlEST atossm PROPOSED rooTIHG ELEVAlKlN. AUER TO ORAWNC c::RADIMC PlAN DRAVlIHCS FOR SLAB [!]IISTAU. FIRE IMlIlANT. VAlIt: AND VAl\{ 801 ElEVATIONS AND RElA1[I) FOOTlHGS. a. AU. WATER SEJMC6 OUTSIDE Of" El.nLDlNO fOOT OIY Of' HOI'IUHS STANOARIlS AHO SPECD:An PRiNT IS 10 HAW; A UitrIWUU ~ 7.5 FEET CE COS III CORE 0IiIU. liTO EXIS1ING CATDl BASIi All/) 0'<tR TOP 01' PIPE. CllHIECT NEW STORIl SEllER PIPE. GROUT SE AIlOl.tlO PElElRATOI. REPAIR AU. IlISTURlIEI TOP Of SlOOP SlJRFACfS PIlI OIY Of' HOI'KIHS STANDARDS. (TOO) [!] ADJJST IlANHll( fIIAIIE AHO CASllHC TO IIA FOOSHEO GIl.\DE. NO I.Ql[ THAN 6 ADJJSTIIf GARAGE SlAB (05) RNiS WI. II: PlJIIITTED (OISTIHG PlUS ra COlIllHID). CONlRACTOR IS TO REPlACE A S Of' 1IlE lIANiCI.E F YalE 1HAN 6 ADJJSn.a RNiS WI. lIE REWIRED TO IlAISE !HE F1lAIIE CASTING TO FOOSHEO GIlAIlf. _ NUlI8E AOJJSTIlEJiT RNiS PEIlIIlTTIJlIS 2. r-2:1' Q) SINGLE FAMII V r:r NOT TO SCALE I I I <; I I 1<; t I I~ I I 1 I~ t I "J ~ :: .- IkJ I n~ ~'i ~ tb la :e t&-.t 10, '. I f r-l I Lj ill ~I m ~..,. . 2ND STi =------ ~ ~ ---------.... F".-__ _____. I ~ 1 GEOMETRIC & PAVING P~ ca '"=50' I RIPRAP REQUIREMENTS ~ IlIA. '2" .8" '1 OF DEPlH DEPIH ROUND L Q..ASS , Q.ASS W ~ PIPE RiPRAP RlPRAP IN. (FT.) (CU. \1l5.) (CU- \1l5.) 12 8 2.8 ... 15 8 2.' ... L 18 10 3.. 5.. 21 .0 '.2 6.3 2. '2 5.5 8.3 ....E1.&L 27 '2 5.8 8.7 3D ,. 7.3 10.9 36 18 9.2 1J.8 .2 18 10,9 16.3 CA TOi aM .. 2D .2.9 19." NEEHAH R~ EQUAL Nn GRATE. 2' CURIl BOX. ....IIlmL YHIWUM OF 1. fOR PIPES CReA1ER THAN Jt:r Of.. CCt.ICF USE 1'-6". AD..usTUENl 2. THE cotllRACTOR AT HIS 0Pll0N. ALJ.JllIED. ~ WAY suesnTUJE ^ GEOlEXTLE ~ FABRIC Ell.ANKET. Un/DOT SPEC. 3601. UNLESS OrHERwlSE NOTED ~ tHE SPEC:FlCAllOtls. 3. \'OUJWES OF GRAM./LNf ALTER SHN..L BE '/2 THE \'OUJlIE OF SEE HOTE I Of RP-RAP AT N<< GNfN PIPE IlWlETER. GRANUlAR flllER EUHKET SEE NOTES 2 MID J SECTION B-B @)~p-R~.lT FLARED ENDS (UnlDOT STD. PLATE 3133C) Tll) _ REllIIlRED SIZE Of' cu. >D. PIPE III\IDOT Jeo' a. . ~- '2' to 2~ . 2>"t033" a ~ .... 10 .... '2 ! HtUS 54" to 72' II J.----------- ..llllIIli;.., .. T1ElASI3JClO11S, USE2T1EIIOI.J TOP FASIDERS PER .I)Irlf IISTAlLED AT 60" FROU TOP Of' IIOTTDW OF PIPE. 2. PIlfMlt: 3 ClJ'S to FASTEN lIlASH CUAIID to FI.Nlm EJjQ. HOT Ill' CoILVANIZE AFTER F~ t-:s----'---------- l ........... : TIE : lIlASH CUAIID J.------------------------------- SIZE OF IWlS .t(' IIOl.IS PIPE .2' to ,,, ~. ~ ~. 21" to.2" I" " ~. SIDE VIEW .... to 72' IV" '2" ," @~~ND SECllON LOAD fACIQI 11 '" ~ 'lie" RIP,;E- 'V Ie t ....... Plpt BFDrnNG FOR RCP .Ill alIIPACElIllllllll. ..... ~ PVC Plpt B~DDlNG IN GOOD SOILS @Wl~MIPE BEDDING AU. PlAlt ~s ARE TO FACE OF CURB (S" 10 ....0< Of ClHl) It. SUJPE 3/4' pER rOOT I' VARIES (SEE PLAN) TO PtIl5>IID CIWlE 1/2' R I SEE PLAN .,. ." 4 . ~ 7' 6:. ,~. .~:. . ' f .~. :' " . ~ :.- , " -.. ~ 4. ~ .4. 4 . 4 I 00"'00,,0"00"': ,,0 .' ~.O"," '0.000. .0 " 12' 12'" LlIN. ;; " " I ~iJ!. OJ ~~ EXtEND AGGREGAlE BASE A W,HIN\M '" I OF 12" fROlI EOOl: Of OUTlER OR 2'" MIN. DEPnt AGGREGATE BASE WAltH INTO AGGREGATE BASE a:" CQ.IPACTED 10 1DOS STANOARO Ul PRoc11lR DD1SlY '" Jr: ~AlE PA~T SECnCll '" llllmi; " Ii: ," 1. DIRECTlON or lRANS'vfRSE GUTTER SlOPE TO a.lATOi D1RECTlOH OF ADJACENT PA\oODIT SLOPE. z I 2.. CONSmUCl CURB AND GUTTER lH ACCORDANCE WITH WNooT SPEOACAnCfl 2531. ~ SANITARY SEl\8l (I , @~l~ ~f3 &: GUTTER I I CORPORAllON STOPS OR EQUAl ~~~~H::J&P) FORO-F600(l") NOlE I. WATER SERlllCE IS TO BE TYPE K C< :z. COPPER IS TO BE ONE CONllNUQUS COlJPUNGS. ETC.. AlLO\\€ll FRQI.t IIA . :. EXTEND AGGREGATE 1/2'" R " BASE A WNlWUt.I a:- N @~~~D WATER ~ 12'" FRQ"I EDGE OF .' .... GUTTER OR W"" la-t 6 INTI) AGGREG,t.tE. BASE Of APPROPRIATE PAVEUENT SECnON . 1: 1 s..oPE "00" 0 ",0.; 12'" ),lIN. ~~~~~~~T...ffi:.:m) - BINDER COURSE PER ..,../OOT 2331. llllmi; T't'PE JIB I. DIRECnOH tF TRANS\'ERSE QJTTER SLOPE TO UATD1 OIREC~ <F ADJACENT PA\9IENT SLOPE. 2.. COOSTRUCT WRB >>6.l QJTIER Ii ACCORDANCE "11TH J.lHDOT SPEClACAnOO 2531. ~B61i CONCRETE CURB AND GUTIER IEIII~=~ !is 11=!i NOT 5CALE SCARFY NIl RECOYPACl 9JBGRADE TO AT lEAST looS SfANDARD PROCTOR - COISlY-PR~ RW. pat WKJOOT 2111 @;~~S PAVEMEt ~ ElEVAllON Of' RAUP S - , . , , . . , . ':~;f~~i~l;}~:i~-t~~~~{:~~~H~t:~ SECTION A-A .~~~~~~~ I. SURFACE 1REAlUENT StW.L CONSIST ~ AN EXPOSfD AGGREGATE flNSH. 1IiE AGGREllA TE SHAU. lIftT 1IiE REQUlROlENlS Of "NftXll SPEc. 3\J7 D..ASS C CA.-7D WOOIfED TO 100% PASSNO THE 1/'Z' 5If\ot:. USE CE AND />"YhY)).'/~ . EPOXY 80NDED AOORfGAlE 9JRFACE FN9i IS PAOfiIElTED. 2. 'tHE ENTRE RAW? AREA VrIU. BE oo1\.1>>ED Vllnt ^ C(tflRACTK:I'lI JONT. ~~~~ CURB RAMP @~U SIDEWAU AI..1.. PLAN D1..rNSIC>>lS ARE 10 FACE Of CURB (6" 10 BAD( a' cuRS) Ii. SUlPE 3/4' PER FOOT I VARIES (SEE PLAN) TO fIIIlSttED GIUOE Y I ( SEE PLAN ( " . . .. . I . .' 000. OeD" II~ ;'0.0 12' ~ .... Pi I ~~ EXTEND AGCRECAlE BASE A ".mll" (II I ~~ Qf 1'.1. mow EOOE. Cf' CUTTER OR 2."' WIN. OEPlH NXiREGA.'TE BASE WATOt INTO AGGREGATE BASE CF' CQIr,IPAClED 10 lODS STANDARD (II PROCTOR DENSny '" Jt: APPROPRIATE PA"IEWNT SECllOH '" twmi: " 'j; \' C 1. OlRECllON or lRANSVERSE GUTtER 9...OPE TO \&AlOi ClRECllOH. OF ADJACENt PA'IOIEKt s..oPE. z I 2. CONSTRUCT CURB AND QJTTER IJ.I ACCOROANCf WiTH UNOOl SPECflCAnCW 2:531. ~ SAIIITARY SEYoER (I " @~'i>~ & GUTTER I I CORPORA nON STOPS OR EQUAL ~~~t:>Hl~l;l FORD-F600(1") ( ) NOlE 1. WA lER SERVICE IS TO BE TYPE K CO! SLOPE 3/"''' PER fOOT 2. COPPER IS TO BE ONE CONnNUQUS f TO ffllSHEO QlAOE CQUPUNGS. ETe.. ALLOIIED FROI.l IIAII 1/2"' R . ~ EXTEND AGCREGAlE: " BASE A Y1Nlt.Il.IN OF N @I-~WD WATER S 12. fRCI,l EDGE OF .' "- GOnER OR MATQi ~ IJ.lTU AGGREGATE BASE " Of APPACPRIATE PA\9tENT SECnON " . 1:1 SLOPE . D;: II C> DO; 12" I.AIN. ~A =c~:r?lli':a,) emOfH COURSE PER "'/DOT :WI, WIlIi:i: nPE J1B 1. DIREC'f)(J.I ClF TRAHS\€RSE QJrTER SUPE TO WATDi D1REC~ rF ADJAc::ENl PA'llEUaU Sl..OPE. 2. CONSTRUCT CURS AND GUTTER IN ACCORDANCE 'MfH WNOOT SPEOACAllC14 2531. @B6'~ CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MOT ~ SCARFY NIl RECOYPACT SU9GRADE TO AT LEAST 100S STANDARD PROCTOR - DENSITY-PROOf Ra.L PER wt/DOT 2111 @~~~S PAVEMEN d [LEVA nON OF RAIIP S - , . . . '. SFCTION A-A ' ~~il~~fi~~;t~;}~t~~~~:~f.;\~VN~; 1. SURFACE lRE.MloIENT 5tW.1.. COtI';iGT (F AN OPOSED AGGREGAlE ANSi. '~><<~><<~'1<><<~ TliE AGGREGATE 9iAU. WEET "DiE REQVIROIENTS Of WNjOOT SPEc. 31J7 "'X.%0~~~'" Q..ASS C CA-70 MODIFIED TO lC10X PASSING tHE 1/2- ~ USE (E AND /# //, /. / EPOXY SOUlED -'OOREGAlE 9JRFACE FN9'l tS PROHtBlED. 2. \HE ENIIRE IWlP AREA ....... BE OUIUNEO ..lH A COOlRAC11ON ..oNT. @M~ CURB RAMP @~U SIDEWALK . Site Landsc.~pe I '" . Common Name B<< . - -- R1'll Ml<I. -ur:~~~ ~ ~t1Jn1N'r* ~ M'" Q "'" ;;... tv "... C \ z I (C:~~~" I " LJ ~1-~---_.'._--- "-.:: 'b- I\ZJl> ;l-~ ...........1lt.l'I!I'l<<!I~ -\.:%1< I>B1"oILJ I I I I Q EXISTING WATERSHED CONDITIONS Cl.n 1" = 50' I I I ,;, .:, / '111...:\ b:.b ~~" ,"':lll, ';,'1..:..._. ,-'" \'_~ " @ ;.~~POSED WATERSHED CONDITIONS 1 . ~.~....._. Founda \ ~~ '''It'' . ~"Ctc.ca-..,... ~IPI-If<<'"..oc:. ~....~. '.' ,. ./ u .sH1'<lI? I'tJ.>.lfllol;;r U<l1'l1.. __N<UJOI'I"~' -f~=-',--, ". .. ,,~.u~~ -'~'''' --.-..-::. ~~~I'1If'IA:;IP1iP4t i " ----(j,~;>- "'!~~"" 1\ , ._--_.u4_ I .; /;,..---va ..."*"'~ I i. i ,,...-t.~I'v!i>.r.'<fIo,"'e:"i""t'"Q;;I<.. I / +"(.LA,.~,r;;.lJ.~1:. .. ~ ... ._'. ~ -*--- .fe-no .(f"lff'-bt:9I.A ~E\lA'11CiN , ~~ ".::r.I'-D- All plaJlIiJ\gl;_ t.>_ "'....... lAd olD 1n__AmericanJl!unl...man... CommOA _ ~ Plarmng ~_ be. ,.,., _ _ , port-'- , pal 101I. ..., , parlund. AI pIonIJlllI" _ be QIlll_ fllr.... year (3Il5 clap) fmm dliilt 01 acc<ljllance. ~~~-- Lluldtl<ape 'C_ sIWI "'~ OIlY clald or d~ plants at"" adI:IiIlonai COIIID Ownor during IIle guaranllie plIriod. All1eelIshelbe .laIalQandWll!lllledao&hcwn indulalil. ~~4'" .. .-.. --...!'t'.v: - - --.-~ ~loo!<yHlllo - Sod_becullu1ld~BhlogJaa._oI_andc:lun.,a. I.arJdscape --f-'" --:;::{i" . ~ _wnae. Conl<al:lIl< will WIller al1imol.,! In_ and JOlI.u lIOd .. _ to....... . _. ( ..... LP$ _ f'dnc<1u lUll. All oIolMl1' gJUiBr lhan 31ll.' IhaII t.>-. MY alidinll 0/ lIOd ahalI be rapla<ed I . ~m:~;;' AWS '~_w....... by L~ Conlnlclor. I QK1. .......,\<a<... All alwb _ and _ indlc:a!ied _1BCllIi1riIllI11IlIIdl_ _VIi' 3" """" IaVOf at! /. .ibet _ .....4 mil. bJeckpoly. Alground_.......hall.........,.leyer I /.., T~ QIJllIlIcb_nopoly. ~~ ':' 1:~_- M__....._____-__.-, f f ,c'" ,Mi1I~ delalll. I. :.., 1l9!.~ ,I!lIcjoIVeI - AIlIiuub _ and _Indk:allld ..18CQIving waod.<hlP muI<h _ _ a 3. Gaep I . " , " .-'- la\'e<of'.-1.1oll._0och:hipel....of...-.IIjlig..and_r..~.lIobri&<MIl" I '.' . .~Do"'" 4 mi. blaok pcIly. All ground CQ\lIf ......_raceiva. '.1Iy<ir of....od chip I1IlIIdlwillt I .-' , ; ~ no poly. ' . . i ..~. ~- Ml.f' Pl1Io>-,-LJnlprd-- ""'-~_~___._~__, ,I \ ,~' <;OIl ~_..... IhefiolclpliOtlllanyplallli1gCllMl<'lli<>n- -.'/- .,-:". ..._.-, .'. .' .' " , BIS _Sage, flWo Hill < , '., "'~ ,"', . ...---- .~,.- . .' " . . ",' ~ AJS .___-Ri. o . .' . . ' ."\. 'x' , .. '..; "t..."'~""""~'~'';'" ", 'J ) .... .'. ~-,~" . . . . . "''''''' . . />, ,', >~':< 'j /.,.~ .... ..r .. / .. ."~../'. "." ~, j'~' ~./ " III ,- " " 1 .P'1<110 I ~"""-' - ,.,...... ..,IEy.! ~:ti"l'~I-o' ..,._...".,."c....... .. .;."..0,,,...... ~-'",'.". . . )1f)'rLlEA.;;;T SECOND STEEE r N( ;'~-:::=eiii-~~:::~ ~ :' '. ../' ....""-_.-.-~ /r~ w, ~- --y *"'- "'" ." n",CE I ~ rOD GIll om Ell!:l l II I U:10 r.m;:1 . ~..b:u. lu:D ~ OFFICE: -r.: ." li:ii:l tm f1'5\ .,,,,UNG 'A"""" ~' ~ I . !. tal 100 an:::J I. l:11S tii:Il 0Dl . ~ D:ll3 EXISTING BVILDlNG .SlfI I WITH PROPOSE.D REVISIONS: ,'''J l--E~ I .1 _J 61\"rll '\ I: ..--_ ft- . . iI .-.' fClJ I I " _ ',~ ll.:ro Im:J i . . Sl"ORAGllJ ,__ . . CJ.lEI 0l:!I 1JIlJ! r J DUU~ .. WAREliOUS~; '1- ~. .1 . I WAlU:J10U:,E I ti!n IlO:O . !i WrIT - I ) em fDD 'II ." _ -; !l:lDm:n BtD \ ~I I ~ ! {l:[lfltW 0Pl l I I, __ .01 GIJl I II _ o:m ,. . I _. ~ I Ell).! . _ -, I 'I '. a::tO lIm , _ i<o~ Qtn i .-en:::J ~ ." [J!Jl ""'" I I /' _ . D:lIl ...... " ..- _ .; atC1 .ff- .lJl:Il ~ DO> "'" I nPANhm-'!1 _ "..'" . lOD FJII:l I I 'I' L./' 0Dl onl I I ,'./ __/ i:li:Il , i ! . ,,' ../ rlJ!j lctJ i I I I .OIl','" /' 'I ./ " \:llO I ! I I '\ ~ F~rL'IG TR~r::S // r.lUl I . ! ~/" / \tlL1 I I I . j 1/" .~' "'" "'" "'" ~ ." I ! L -f-- 41iL--f.-/"\., _// lrIlJ ~ I I I r-- \e ./ x" 1 I ~ ~ .... ....... "'- I I I I . .; /X::: .-/', ____ a;r:J ! I I I , /', ,/ '-_._ ' ',-- '-,' . . SlJ:1 [PJ 0Dl . I i I \ naSTI)i!; Tll,EE // . '"'\. .,>.( / 150U 0Dl! ! ~---' )/ ,~$ ,/_" ~ u::uJen:J lDlJ -, /./ ~~v .,.,/' ,~ . . . , ---.--' /", S. / I. I DOl erw L_.______'1,. /' O'~)..'b ./' n:!DE!lI:l L I .../ "\I.' // ~l 0lJ) cn::n ___ _J /,~ V ,- w",,, ro3J // "b ~.. // - ~ / / f:l EXISTING PAgK[~r; //",; . m1l ett:J _// I OlE! lJU] .../ ~.II u:;!:I ..,/ - '"", / -.. ' I~ //./~. . NO. RTH Qu~~_ . .,,/ . I .. .> . 7 Slag_ . . // . i . 1t' 15 ,Ai,lIUlM_ ' . ,/' : ~ 24 'SUA __ $lmIni ~ // ..' .. 5 'fC1l<l AmurRame~ ' . /",; /' 9 'sse i(;r,lbapple. apring- : // --/. t . 3 JCL iUillc. ~ Clump . ..,/ /' ~ ~ 0 {} 50 100 e fiHS':!SpM:Il. _1iiIls. ! // //~ ~ 5 6 RID '~RedTwigged ~ /..- ,/' ~ ~ ~ 6 NAV NoMyl>tHJV /' /' ............. ~ ~ .-- " ./' ,// ~/ ~~~/.,~ ~ r/~. ~ " , ~ ~ ; , -------~..-_..- , . . C::::::: ::::::: ::::::::::::::::::f:: :::::: :::::::: ::::::::::::=F JAllESSl.IIQ -A- IIO.Ewn.L "8' RS.A'T1VI! !!1.EYATION . 0"-0- ftELATIYI! ELEVATION. 0'-0- IIEl REAR 02 ~:;;;;: ~ 't . '. -- "'- .:\ i , " ~ ~ = , JAIIESIlllIIQ 'C- IIO.EWEU. 'D' n n RB..A~ B..EYATION .0'-0- R.ELATlVE ELEVATION. 00-0- III " ~ FRON' = 01 ~~:;;~;. , ~ ~ " ~ f ~ ! ~ .. t i i ! } ~ ,------- , ,.---- , 1 " ~::: ::::::::::: ::-=:: :.-::: :=::=:::::: ==.::::::::: =:::./ ~ . ~ LEFT CONTROL ELEVATION - UN , o 3 ~~;: .;~~;.~.... ~~;:... . .... ..... ........ .............'........... ............ ...... ........ ; . ~. "',., ~.-..a " BIH ---------- -- --- ---- " .r: ;;;::::--,- Bm OOH 1~ .., ';"~ Q" -i . .. ( "~ o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.!~~!!?~..~..~!~. SCAl..EI tIe. .. 1'_0N ..' . . . .. . .. . . <' I' -(1)" . ",F<AKE 0VERJ-lAl-lG "- ~I 'ST'T"LE eclLunCNS- F~ PiTCH 61..CCK -0'" EQlJAL "ST'T"LE 5OLUT\C1'oIS' ~\ COfii:l(Z]XI-4 c....."'"'RSa. 61'!ACl<ET -OR EQlJAL SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET AT GABLE PEAK ! ~ o 7.~;~:-._"_._._._._.'.'''''''.'v"""",.,..'''''.'.'.;;;~'.~..~:.:.;: E ( if; ! "STYLE SOLUTION~ DCH%>XS DOOR. " CROSSHEAO OR EQUAL 0 ~ ! ! 'ST'T"LE SOLUTION! Q . eKT1SX30 A~H 6RACKET ~ ..OR EClIJAL 0 / S' F'REFAB ----' COLlJ'1N . ~ .,. El.....L CAP - ] .STYLE OOLUTION S" ElALUSTRAOE ~ S-rSTeM "' -OR E<2.JAl. ! ~STTLE ~LUTION i NP6X48 JolEuJEL POST ~ -01< E<2.JAL i ......... ~.......... , Bffil~ ~ +i-l.J\ I:1 r} " BIB ---- -- ----- -------- " or:: ~A 8m ffim RIGHT ELEVATION. STD. o 3 ..;;.-;;,'i.:...................l~-;::.;::;;,,: 9~~- 'I I "5T"rLE SDLUTloNS" ~ ~ ______ HLD3st-e DEHTtL -=~~ . HOULD . DR EQUAL l :3 3 In~-'.-"'3 3/4" E ;f; Q E SIDE PROFILE FRONT VIEW ~ c 02 DENTIL MOULDING ......................".-............0-..............,-....... ~ 5CALE: In" . I'"q)" ~ "ST"rLE SDLUT HLD3st-e DEN ~ MOULD , OR EQUAL \ eRICK 5D~DIE (FROJECT 3/4 tlJI KETSTeNE ;; 13' PREFAB- ~ CO~UMN ] 6" BALL CAP ~ "5T'rLE SO\...Ui 5' SALU5TRAt ;. e.""',STEM ] -OR EauA~ ~ ~ "5TTLE &C\..Ul NPbX48 ~ NEWEL pOST -OR EQJAL i ""N ~.......... , ffij " ~I} --- --- -------------- " ~r: ;;;;:-] 11 . o 3 .~!~~!..~~.Y.~!!~~..~..~~~. SCALE. lie.- . 1'-cZI~ .' \' -iZ>" "F<AKE OvEf<I-lANG ,-\ . j'~~ ~~- F101Z1 PI1CH aLOCK . .Of< EQUAL ~ "SilLE 50LUiloNS" eo CORIlZlX14 CORElEL eRACKET .01< EQUAL '" "----0 SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET o 2.~!.,.~.~.~.~~...f..~.~~..w_._............-.-.-...w SCALE:; 1/2" : r -~.. . if; g 0 ",;orLE SOLUTIO 0 OCH~"~ 0001' '!' CROS,*,EAD -OR EQUAL ,. ! r 1 "SorLE SOLUTIOt eKT13X2" vleTO eR-ACKET -OR EQUAL e" P1<S'Ae> ----' ~ COLUMN \ ] b" eALL CAP- ;; ',;orLE SOLUTIO. . :;." BALUSTRADE: '0 i ';TSTI:M ~OR EQUAl... "e>T1LE SOLUTIO.. NP'&X48 ~ NEUlEc po,; T -OR EQUAL i -- "'.., ~......... 1 fmr ~ IP~ LI .c n ~ ------- -------------- n .r:: ;;;;::l. " 8m ROO ~ .... !? o 3 _~!~~~..~!:~.Y.~I!~~..~..~!.~. SCALE. lIe.- . I'-~" -, ' .. -. - .- _, -.. . :",- 9~- 1 r____ "'~~ ~~~" s '" l"LD3!'>1-8 DENTIL ..:of _ r-ctJLD -, ! "" 3 OR EQUAL 3 112,;-0"""3 3/4" E ~ 0 m . SIDE PROFILE FRONT VIEW ~ " 0 DENTIL MOULDING 0 02 ................-...-.......-.....-...-.-.-.-.-...".-.",",",", ~ SCALE, In-.. t'-O" 0 ~ '5 TTLE :.oLUTlO MLD3&1-8 DENT! , MOULD ~ OR EOUAL :! > l ~R!Cl< ,;oLDIE" fFROJECT ~/4") u.v KE'r5TONE ~ 8' PREfAB- COLLHN j OM 6ALL GAP - ~ "STYLE 50LUTIC . 5" flALU5TRAOE ;" 1 5.,-5 TEM -OR EGUAL ~ ~ "e<TYLE 5OLUT1C NP&X48 ~ NEWEL PQ5'T -OR EQUAL i " "'."" ~.......... ~ I 0'"" lDEB3D1 . . y lDEE3DJ mEBlJJII . . . ~ . O 3 .~!~~:!..~~~!~!!!?~..~..~:':~' SC,,~,LE:I lie" II 1'-lZl" "'.... ........",...... ...-... ~ t p 8m ~ 8IE . . ~ .. .... .' 06 ~.1.~~!.~~~!:..:.~9.~~~..~!~~:.9.~.!1.l?~..... SCALE: 1/8" . 1'.0" ( 0- -_:! r~E'~ i "5"NLE 50L\.lTICt:5" 0V24X3&X4f"1 - 14" 'TRIM) , -OR EQUAL :0 " '" I'J\- ~ ~- . m ill , ~ r; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,', '''''R.4 " .J!!t::.. k _, ~ "5T'fLE OOLUTION .. 2 DCI-l5bXC3 DOOR - ~ CR055HEAO ~ OR EGlUAL ~ i ~ I 7 m- -::. (Jl D i .-eALLCAF ~ "STTLE .soLU"I~f " ~ ",' ~ALue.TRADc.r f'.I .sYSTEM .:::: ! .O~ EQ,JAL 1 ~ :.. I~l FLR ~ "5TTLE SOLUTION'9,':':':':":'::::: ~ NF&X48 .\ ~ NEuJEL pQSl ._~l~~ G .O~ EClJAL r d ~ " - -- =-"""" .......... ~ 0''''' BIB o 0 BIB rnm N o 3 .~!~~!..~~.~.!~!!~~..:..~!~' SCALE> ,,~. . 1'-<2''' """""""'............... 0''''' ~ t . Em .r:::;;;;: mm ;m A RIGHT ELEV. - BONUS RM. OPTION o 6 ~;;;~~~~,..................-.....,....-.-'-,.,..-.._..-.._._...M..._.'~;;~.-:.i:~~-:. ,.\'_€''' ",!<AJ<E OVERHAi'G " '1-----' f I ""TTLE "OLUTICN5" I FIOO FITC>-I aLOCK I -OR EQUAL 'ST'TLE SOLUTION,," CORIOXl4 COREEL BI<ACKET -OR EQUAL " ~ SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET __c' T ~!:L. t: AT GABLE PEAK 0- 1 O. ;;~~~':""""""" .... ...... ;~:::. ~:.:;:, ~ ~ 0- ! ,. in E ~ ;. .- ~ "' '; " ~ - )~EhJ 'S1TLE SOLUTlONS' ~ ~ DCi-l~l&XS DOOR . T/F'L . . ~~.3~fCCl ..-.,.....C ~ 'enLE SOLUTIONS" BKT28X34) ARC'"' ~ BRACKET -OR EQUAL ! ,. 0 ill ! 6" E3ALL.. C.O.P ~ ~5TTLE 50LUT1ONS- , 5" !3ALUSTRADE ~ '~ ,,.,'5 TEl"\ I -OR EQUAL '? ;.. let FL -$TTLE ~OLl.JTloN5' ~ Z NF6XA8 ~ NE\lEL P05 T , T IfNC -OR EQUAL -.-,.-..---- i 1m ;; - .... "'""""'"................ G1 &.... I I} I o 3 .~!~~!..~~.~.'?~!!~~..:..~!.~. SC.ALEt \,a" .. I'-IZI" """"'""'................ &."" ~ j n e e I . . . . .- .' , o 6 ~!~I!!.~~~!:..:.~P~~~.~~:.P.P..T.'.<<?~..n. SCAI-E; l/e" '5 "-0" ,.1'-0" ..RJ>l<E OVERNAN:; r-----:r 'oT'T"LE SOLUTIONS" ,,"J GFKltUl \''')0 GABLE PEDIMENT -OR EQJAL cJ (LOCA1'ED AT eA.C.KSIDE OF ~ ""'M 130) - TRIM EDGEo TO CORRESPOND TO 'ST'T"LE 5OLUTI~~' ". c:: ROOF SLOPE UX;>-l4~Xb ilJlNDouJ Cf<OSSHEAD ~ OR EQUAL ~ SIDE PROFILE OF GABLE PEDIMENT ~ @ < 1 0 .~!...~~~~~.~~!.-.~..".............. in ~ 0- ~ ~.ALE, "7"' 1'."" _..1'-(2)" ..oveRH-""'G ;, 0 ~.~"~~ ;;; ~ "5TTLE eoLUTloN5" "i DCHSb:<'" DOOR~ t: DTLBaX6Xb Cf<OSS'E.AO . ~ . 5RACKET OR ECJJAL ~ ~ EQUAL . ~ "ST'T"LE SOLUTIONS' , eKT13X1~ VICTORIAN SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET BRACKET -OR EQUAL 2nd FLOOR OVERHANG ~ ! 11 ............................................ -. $CALEs 11:1" . 1'.0" '" i 6' ~ALL. CAP ~ "STTLE 50WTIO'tS" S" BALU5T1<ADE ~ 'i 5T5TEN ~ -OR EQJAL -? ~ ~ -STTLE SOLUTIO'S" ~ NP;::.X.48 ~ NEuJEL F05 T r: -OF< EC\JAL --y.' .--- ! I88ll888! "".v ~'lrOtoI.AL6IoIl~ MA)(.5F.AN ~. ~ DOpU" '~11' .................................................................. &."" " m - .' r-: II m o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.'f.~!!~~..~..~!~. SCALE. 1,e" . I'.el~ "" ec.'Jl"fl"'CeT~~~ ~."" ~ il " II r-:: II III . .' . . .. .. - . . RIGHT ELEV. - BONUS RM. OPTION . . o 6 .;;;~.._..."..,..,v,._..,......,.....,u,.....,......,........,..~~~.....:..I~:~:... . . . . VI~ 51t 1'-0" .OvER!-I~ ltm" ="~, l: DTL68XbX& .' f3RACKET .~ EGlUAL SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET 2nd FLOOR OVERHANG :=~ 1 0 ..;;;;~.~_;...............w...................-.-.....;;:...~..;;~;: ; ~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ :.... 2nd FLR ! j ]I!!:~=~ . :! , t "5rrLE 5OLUTIONS' ",KI:laX3€> ARCH f3RACKET ! .OR EQUAL i boO BALL CAP \!l ~ ~ "STTLE SOLUTJOI\lS- 5" BALUSTRADE .. ;" S.,.5 TEM ir> 'i -OR ECUAL ~ 't .:::. let. FLR ~ "ST'TLE 50LUTICNS'~- NP6X48 I I 0 NEIl.EL POST ~ T A'ND'TN -OR EG:UAL ._..:...~---. .--- i lSllSllIl8ll ""... ~~bltc.I..D ~ rgt~"'~B ~."" , i.,.... '] [ :t:t. i II ~ o 3 .!'!!~~!..~~~.y.~!!~~..~..~~~, ~ALEI ll!~'. 11 1'-0" ,.,. ~""...... ~."" 01 Si '[jltlE' : ..(uh t to :J::!:: .,j II , y RIGHT ELEV. - BONUS RM. OPTION o 6 .~;~,...,..,~~.,.'..'._...'.'.H'.. .,.,...,.......,.......~~M..~...\~:;,:~. '. "-e>" d<AKE OvERi-l-"""" ,,"r!- I I \;l "$TTLE SOLUTIONS" ;,. CI~a'X4F ~ (4- 'TRIM) 1)fE;. F=R.AMINl::l -OR EQUAL (PAD-OUT 6A6LEJ ._~:.,~!~!:-.~ I "51TLE WLU110N5" " DTLBG)I'4)1./& ~ DEN;!L ~ ! .'" -OR EG:UAL -; 0-' '----Q) in ! SIDE PROFILE PADDED GABLE 'T ~ 10,........................................... ;n ~ SCALE: 112" . 1'-0- '; , ~'r:LR ! .....----, 'J::: j AFa::~ED vINYL ~ AFRO' .5'-5" RA IU5 15-111" RI5EJ , .. { ~ ~ .. -; 1 '" ~ .:::::.. bl Fl-.r:a :;~~~~~~I 1 SW;l!:BI "''''' C(MOQ6<""""- ......... ~ i9i~tB .."" t: .<..~. J : ::!::r: ~: .. BIB o 3 .~!~~!..~~.~.Y.~:':!~~..~..~!.~' SCALEt Ita" . t'-s" "'''' ~~ICLES 0t ..,., 1it '[1m : = .~...~. ~' lU :t:t: .j BIB " . . . . . . " . o 6 ~.I~~!..~~~:o!:..:.~~.~~~.~.~:.~.~.!.I.'?~..... SCALE: liS" I 1'~0" .. . . . 9~- '1 r __________ 'STYLE SOLUTIONS" S; '" " 2 ML.D351~8 DENTIL .STYLE WLUTION1:- . ~W~AL tOC:>-l3"'~ WINDOW- CROSSJ.lEAD OR EQUAL 3 :3 1/2;;'"':""--::-'3 3/4" ___"' 1]~~ SIDE PROFILE FRONT VIEW , ~ 0- ! DENTIL MOULDING o 2 .;;;a:~.,.'......"'.".,;;:'~.i::;.. "";- i in 16"W PANEL S"'-lTTERS . ~ ~ 0f ~ , -. 'nd I'L ];!~-- ! I . ~ ~ 1 "";- u '" ~ ~ ... ~ ] i '? =-. let FlR 'l~~~1 I ,. :S&88li2!lI i ,.,... ~........ ~ lm ~.... ."n~. j::t 0--11 o 3 .~!~~!..~~.~.!.~!!~~..:..~!.~' :GAlEl \/&- . \'-lZI" """ ~..,-"" ~ ~."" rar ~ .o(..~. j-:~ ~.. o 6 !!~~.~.!.~~~:..~.~~~.'!.~.!!.~...~.P'!.I.~~..... $CoALE: \/8" . \'..0" . 1" _~" ,.J<AKE ovEJ<l-lANG l~' I'IS\J5CA vINYL 5 "ST"r~E 5O~1JT1CN5" "n~ w=~'f GFKII2W GA6~E FSDIt1EH' -OR EaUA~ UX:H31X~ uJtNDouJ (~OCATED AT BACKSIDE CR055J-IEAD OF' RAKE TRIM BD) OR EauA~ -TRIM EDGES TO ._~I_!~~.~ C~"'FOND TO F<OOF S~OFE @--- , <0 . ;:, 0- ~ ";" ~ <0 ~ SIDE PROFILE OF GABLE PEDIMENT AT GABLE PEAK '" g 1 0 ,;;~~;"".,u'._..".'.'."'._.."..I;;':":.'I::;;. "' ~ "! ~ ~. 2n'" F~Fi ~ ~f::- . ..-..... .1:: . 'srr~E 5O~UTICNS' 0 eKT13X?S vle,ORI'" - BR-^CKET ~ ~ -Of< EQU"'~ ! ";" '" ;; ~ ., ~ 1 "! i =-. It)t FLf< -'1~~~ i BSll8SSl ; . ",'"' ~......... M,A.)(.~.AN. 'to' 3 ~ C.-II" .3 X; lEo'~Il- ,... ~l;'l] ~',", r .,..~. "] , -i--'- . ''" ...u...~ ,,-' BIB '" o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.Y.~!!~~..~..~!~' $CALEI I/~. . 1'.(2:1" ~.......... ~...... ~ j iO~i '(J .,..~. .' L_ :t:::: __J BIH ~",'. . .'- .... o 6 .~.I.~~!.~~~~:..:.~~.~~~.!l.~:.~.~.!I.~~.... SCAJ...E: 118".1'.(2:)" '," . 9~~ "f r "\ ""T"rL.E ""LUTION,," j- .______ MLD~&1.8 DENTIL MOULD ---'" '"rfLE SOLurl~,,' . OR EQUAL UX:.~~0XS UJlNDOUJ---.. CR055l-lE.AD ~ ~~A~~ SIDE PROFILE FRONT VIEW ~ ~0- 1 10 DENTIL MOULDING ..........,...,.............,......,.....,. -; , !:CALE: I"" . 1'~0" in ~ "'''UJ f'ANEL " 5HUTTER5 _ ~ ~ 0) <'\ ~ '!" , =-. ;!nd FL JT~__ I ~ , ~ ~ ~ ii -; { 6> ~ ~ .. ~ 1 '? =-. l~t FLR :I::J ~ ,. '> .r: "" ~...-... ~ ~."" 8m o 0 o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.~~!!~~..~..~~~' eGALEI lIe- . 1'~".. '" ~...-... ~'"" 01 1ff~- . r""FllCEAT QOIIrI!l't!c::ttLT 0)-. mm ... RIGHT ELEV. - BONUS RM. OPTION o 6 .;;~"C~:.............. ..... .......... ..........V;:.:.,..:~:. _' 1'-<2)" ,~RAKE OvERi-lAN6 '1 'srrLE 5OLUTlONS' F10" PITCH BL=K 'OR EQUAL 'srrLE SOLUTIONS' CORI"X14 CORl3EL BRACKET ,OR EQUAL N5T"'rLE SOLU1 ~ DC"~X!l WIN CROSSHEAD ,OR EQUAL SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET ,. 10 AT GABLE PEAK ......-----..-.....----------.----..--.--... i -------.--......----.-..--......---------.. j SCALE, In" _1'.",.. . ij- , & 16'UJ PANEl " S>JUTTERS 0 ~ 0 - ~ , ! . ARC~ED vlN1 AF'RCN .. 14'-' Q (:,-112" RISE) " t 'STTLE SOLU' DCt-lSbXS DC CROSSHEAD -OR EQUAL ~ i .. .~ i i ~ i . ",.,., ~T1Ql6l..~ MA)t.~P.AN ~. t.a &' 31" 01 .- , '_I Coll )'G::'~17 ~ . .... . . .... ... .............................................. ..,., m , o 3 .~!~~!..~!:~.Y.~:':!~.~..:..~~~. SCALEI lIe." ,. 1'-0" "''''' .,.,.,."..,,-........... .."" ~ 1Ir (i)-. a , o 6 .~~.~.':!!.~~~!:..:.~~.~~~..~.~:.~.~.!~.~~.... SCALE: liS" , \'-0" _,.1'-"," ..RAKE ove......AN6 1 vlNTL $J.AJ<E - 'ST'r"LE SOLUT'CNS- SIDING FI"'''' FITCH 6l..0CK 'OR EQJAJ.. , 'n~ ,~,~ COFi!5XI", CORBEL BRACKET 'OR EQJAL ~ SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET 10 AT GABLE PEAK ........................................................................"........."...... ~ALEt V2" . 1'.0" 1: . ~ E "" .l! '" " -; ~ "" ~ :!! ~t'f\- ~ .'::. .T-,f.":... . I . ElRICK SOLDIER CRS PROJECT 3/4" . ~ 6RleK 5TRETCI-l R CfCS PROJECT 3/4" ] ~ ~ 'i -; ~ en .,. ~ ::::. le.l FLR .g-r-- . .-.. ~ ~, TIFNDTN 'oj ~ " ""."" """"""""",,.....uu> ei1 ..... I o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.~~~!~~..:..~!.~. SC.A.LEl 1/8" ;I: 1'-.zI" "". """""'"""'"......... .."" ~ lit 0)_. . o 6 .~.I.~.~!..~~~!:..:.~~.~':J.~..~.~:.~.~.!I.~~..... ecALE: 1/8" . I' #lZ)" . . .. J' .(1?" _ RAKE OVERHMlC; ~ ''----'- .,... 'SrrLE SOLUTIoNS' FI<Zl<Zl f'ITCl-I ElLOCK .OR EQJAL ~ "Srrl.E 5OLUTlcNS" ;... CORI<!)XI4 CORSEL 'STYLE SOLUTICNS' 6RACKET UX:i-l~''''lI1lINOOUJ ~ -OR EQJAL CRQ5S>.JEAD ~ -OR Ea.JAL ,. .--" !'~-€:: SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET 0 ; 10'~!""~'~~'~~"'!'~'~~"""""""""""""'-'..... ~ ! -; 0)- SCALE: 1/1" . 1'-".. '" E 0)- ~ _,.1'-0" ''lpYERHANG: " ~ .,,,,, W,",,~,. 'STYLE SOLUTI s- 8 OCl-l51&X9 poo~ ~ ~ CRCSSi-lEAD ~ DTL6aXtDXb .OR EQJAL ;,. g . eRACl<ET ~ 7nd R..I ~ ~ EQJAL .;.h~~ l 1 SIDE PROFlLE OF BRACKET 'STYLE SOLUTION . 11.~~~.~~~~.J:1:.~.~.~.~.':!~~~....... BKT13X1S vlCTORI ~ 6RACKET .. 5CALE, 111- . 1'-0" .Cf< EQJAL " t ~ .. .~ -; if' i ;,. :::.:.. 1~t. FLF: ~ '!h=~~ ,. i ~ ;; ,,,,,,v "',,,..,,,,,,,.............. ('1A.)f.~P..4l-ol :!l'to 6' 3! ~ '.ll' . .."" 0)-. I RIGHT ELEVATION" STD. o 3 .~At:.E;...................I;~:.:.i.:~: ""."" ""'"""""............... ....... ~ t 0)- [fI] o 6 .~.I.~~.!.~~~~:..:.~g.~~~.~.~:.g.~.!I.~~..... SC'.ALE: 1!8~ . I'."" ,~1'~0" ..RAKE OvERH~ :;'1----,- 'STYLE SOLUTIONS" P5WD~leX~2 SUNSUR5T -OR EQUAL '" 7)to FRAMING (PAD-OUr "'ABLE) u6iTTL,.E SOL 0'V24>Cl&X4 (4" Tl'<IM) I " -STYLE SOLUTIONS' -OR EQUAL DTLB6)t'.4x~ DENTIL --- j .~ EQUAL ~ E SIDE PROFILE PADDED GABLE -; ,li 1 0 .~.!...~!:~~.~.I?.~~~.':I.':'.~~!...".. in ~ " SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-"" 0 :!: 0 '" ~ ~ "': "" ~ l I . .. j "STYLE SOL " S eKT28XW ;. eRACKET I -OR EQUAL / ~ ~ ~ . I -. iP , ~. I 'fl , f ;: "" \ I --- o 2 ....~.!:!.~.~r...e.~.~.~.'......!?......:::......~.!:!!.9.~....~.~.9.~.I.!-...y..~~~!....s.~.!.~~.~.~...gf..!~.... .ecALEl 1/8. . I' -0" ! "'.,., ~l~~ ~ "",., & ,.''- """L """"'" ~;dHn ,un .. . o 3 .~!~~~..~~~.Y~!!~~..~..~:':~' SC,tll.El lIea . l'-CZI" ",.,., ~,~~ ~ ..,."" fib 0- . . .. . ,... " .. . . . o 6 ~.I.~~:,:.~~~~:..:.~~.~~~..~~:.~.~.!I.~~..... BeALE: 1/8" . 1'.0" . . .. " . .. FI5H5CALE VIN"'r\.. ~'D1NI 5" M.ANTEL. - 12 N)(24" LOUv\ 0- ._;'JJ1E':- __ ~ ~ 0- 1 .. i<> ~ 1&""UJ lOtl\fE ~TTERS Q ~ ~ ! "SITLE SOL TIONS" 0 . WCH*'X," WI DOUJ 0 CR055l-'EA ~ -OR EC:UAL .. ~ I> , .. '" ... ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ! '? ~ ::- let FLR ]~~~~ ~ i ""... =--""""- ~ d'CCIU.s1' a.AA:EN ~"noICI'"'lQi 00 ~ .... tI .- - . . . . _. m ,.. o 3 .~!~~!..~~.!.~!!~!:'..:..~!.?' ECA1..E: I,e- . I....".. ""... ~T~~ ~ ...,., ~"T~ 111 r~l~QP'flQj, 00 -fr I o 6 ~}.c:~~.!.~~~:..~.~~.~':!?.~.~:.~-~.!'.~~..... SCAoI-E.: I/a" . 1'_0. .- .. . .. . . . . 9- M- 11.)12. .-A]'~- " ~ ::, II; ; -; [ ;" ~ -eTTL..E ~UTI e-_ m E UX::rlB4X'3 UJIN OJ ~ CROeSi4E.o10 G #QF;! EOJAL.. ~ ;. II; 0 ;). "nCl F . Ih!!:~: . " i FI$-lSCALE viNYL =-IOI~ 1 Q: ~ 1 -; iP ~ .. Q: .~ ~ i ~ ;....,. \!It Ft ~ J~~; u i W.2 )10''''''' ~.....,... r1A)t.et-'AH "lc6" ~ ,m.--"' """""'.......,.,. I.. -.. r&,.l.n.& 0PnCH ..~............................~........................................................... ii'm" \ 0- -~~- .r. ..... * i ,. j,~.t Em o 3 .~!~~!..~~.~.y.~~!~~..:..~'!.~. &coALE.. lie.. . 1'-0'" ~.ftY """"""'" ...-.. ..... ~. ~...r~ j rCoATNOl""T\Gt4. ~it~t~ 5: .1..1 J.! mm Em o 6 ~~~.Ii'!..~~~~:.::.~~~.l!.~.~~:.~.~!.I.~~..... ecALE: \/e'".s "..".. n'," c.>. T" LOUV (0- viNYL $iJAK.E- ~IO\NC:l _.._,.!!B-: h "'STYLE: 5OL...JT1CNS" u.C>J3"'''~ uJlNlDOuJ CR055\-lEA1 ; -o~ EQUA;- 1 ~ -;- , io ~ ';: ." ~ ; ? G -. :!naA..R 0 J~,c-~.. . i I""UJPANEL~ 1 e;-UJT\E~ ~l ~ CPTI~l.iP \ -STiLE SOL TION5. ~- BALl1eTR).OE -- .. SYSTEM \ '" 1 -OR EaJAL ~ \ l!ll FLR 0 ~ -~l"--" ;:, _-:-~3_::l .- i i ,.. ,., ~...,..... T1AX.~.AH , tCle' a'Ml ~ UfMXllI AT~ c.a.'''~1GH 'Iillr 0'''' IL~ - +~ L~: (i) ~ -:CI r..c aII3 o 3 .~~~.!.~~~~~:r.lp.~.~..~I~:. $CALcl lIa- . I'-CZ''' ,..,., ~.......... ~. .,.,., \lIN:lOllAl'~ fij rr:s.a.'..l7TQ.I ~J-+~ [~ ~J -i:I [~ 8IB . . . . . . " - , o 6 ~~~!..~.~.~!:..:..~.'?~~~..~~:..'?~!:.~~~?.. SCALE: ria" . ".ft)" . . " .. .. -. .... - . . Q __:"'..}!E~ _ BRICK 50L IER CR5 (PROJECT 3 4") ~ ~ E .. ~ .., m I(D"UJ F.AfI.lEL E 5HUTTERe _ ~ ;,. "' 0 ; 0 N 8 - 2nd FLR , , ..:b~-~ " ~ ~ . 1 i ~ . .~ ~ i ~ ::...... Iflt FLR ~ -".r;=:~ i ~ ;< ,.. '" ec:n-oetT~ ~ MAX.eP.4N '106' ~ 8-11' 1&'_11" ....... C!)-, o 3 .~!~~:!..~I.:~.Y.~!!~.~..~..~!~. SCALEr It5" . I'-(t!" ...'" o::l"f"l:)tlIflQi.ol4~ ~ ....,. ri1 0- . . .. . .' . .. RIGHT ELEV. - BONUS RIA. OPTION o 6 .~~~;~...,...._._....,....,... -,- .....,........ ......._..._..-.............~;...,.: "l~'.~:-" 6RIC:K~ (FROJE 18")1' 24" UJINDOUJ '6I-ACK OPAQUE ElACK 5TAN.DA~ CONDITION CLEAR viSION G.LA55 ."l~ AT v AJJL. T CE IL. INe; OPTI I BRICK SILL (SLOPE TO wASH) --." T..~-t.. 1(0"1.11 PANEL 5i-\UnE~ g ~ E .. ~ in m ! BRICK SILL (SL..OPE TO lUA5 ) Bf<ICK SOLDIER. eRSt-----.... 0 (P~JECT 3/4"j ~ " ;no :2nd FLR "I' .- ~ _:-~--;:~..... , " B""CK SOLO IE'" CF<5_ > (P"ROJECT ~/4") ~ UJI KEi5TONE ii Il- BRIO< SILL S (5L.0Pe TO \lJA5 I ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ., ;" B""CK SOLDIER GF<5 ! (PROJECT 3/4~') - :,. ~ :::::. 1~t. R...R '~rn.... ~ ~ T Il'NOTN ---,~--"--- i ~ " ,..... ~t~~ ~ "'... 0- o 3 .~!~~~..~~.J::.Y.~~!~~..:..~.!.~' $CALCl lIe~ .II l'-~" ,..... ~T~~ ~ ..,."" ir 0- 0.' , . . . . .. . o 6 ~~~.':I.!..~~~~:.:..~~.~.l!.~..~~:.~.~.!.I.l?~..... OC..o.LE.: 118" . l' ~0" . . .. .. . .., . FI5HSCALE VIN-rL ;!>IDIN 9" MANTEL - 12 ")124" \..Ouv @-- 1 ~_.:.~!EI:- ._ ~ ~ 0- ! -; '" ~ Ib," LOUVC :;HUTTERS 0 ~ ~ ! . , 0 -' .. 'g ~ . -; ? ... ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ! '? ~ :;.... I!lL Fl....R .'I~=~~ ~ '~-r-~-"--' i " "'."" e.trI"'Q$l~~ MA:>t.SP.AN 'la6 ~ boOn- 16'.11" o ...... .. ...... ......................................................., ."" Q}- o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.~~!!~~..:..~!.~. :GALE; lie" " \'-0" "'''' ~r~~ ~ .,.'" j Q}- o 6 ~!~.~.!..~~!~:..~.~~.~.I!.~.~!:.~.F.'.!~!?~..... SCAL.E, Uf>" .I'.e' ,.I'-e>" ,J<AJ<E oYERJ.MI~ '1 - "STYLE SOLUTIO! .', f'R\. '-'2e RCUND 'STYLE 5oLUTION5" (\2" DIA. LOUvEf' " FI= FITC,", ElLOCK .OR EQUAL .OR EOUAL "1 ~. vlNTL ARC,", . l='rr~~~- r9'..:?I" R. &" ~Jse 0. CORSXl0 COf'l3EL WI 1<E1"&TONE 6F!ACKET .OR EQUAL " 2'-~" ~ ."'2 ROOF FITC,", SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET 10 AT GABLE PEAK ............'.....-........................'.................................................. ecAt..E: lr.l".. I'-e!" g ~ ! .. "" ! 'r 0 "' 0 't ~ , ~ ! D , l&"uJ FANEL ~ S.....TTERS 6f'ICX ii vENEER g. ~ , { ,. ! 6> OFTICNAL ~ "SoTTLE &OLI.JTl &. SoU BALUSTRA E ;" SY5TEM "i -OR EQUAL ~ ..,. ~ ~. 'el rLf~ '!r;::~ J- --..,.-......---- ,..,., """"""''''''''''~ ~ ..."" 0- .- o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.'f.~!!~~..~..~~~' &cALEl Ite- . \'-0" ,.."" ~nQM.I.L~" ~ ",.,.,. 1iJ 0- RIGHT ELEV. - BONUS RM. OPTION o 6 .~;~:._.. ....~.,.,-.,-----..-_.,..-_..--.. ...--'-'...."'1~;~.-:.1~~.~::-. .. . ,.I'-cZ>" ",RAKE OVERHANG "STYLE 5C'LUTlCNS" 11 GFKhZ'" GABLE f'EOIt1EN1 -OF< EQUAL "STYLE &oLU1ICNS" FISI-l&cALE c:.f'KIOO VINYL SIOINe:. _______ c:.ABLE PEDIMENT -oF< EaUAL "STYLE 5OuJTICNS" (LOCA1ED A1 BAClGIOE UJCH"..)('o Ill1NOCUJ - OF RAKE 11<IM 60; CROSSHEAD fIl"HIc:.1 - 1'I'<1M Etx.ES TO .OR EClJAL CORI<ESFOND TO F<OOF SLoPE ,__",'.I~~c: ~ 0- il SIDE PROFILE OF GABLE PEDIMENT -;- . AT GABLE PEAK ill .l'; 1 0 '-~'~:.'-""""+"""""-"'-"'-'-".'''''N-'i;;:-'-:---~:~.;:: 0- ~ 0- it ~ " ~ ~ . -. ]ndf'U=l, ! ~J~~~ I ~ . ~ ~ -;- ;; iP ~ { 'S"LE 50L T1CNS" &" 6ALU& OE- j S'[STEM -OR Ec:tIAl, ~ -~ ! Or ~ :::. let FLF -!r;;~~1 ~ ---1::-------- i BSSaSI ;; ,..... ~--- ~ r~AT&AR;l&I .........~ till \ ..,., -1:r - - .' . . .' . , . o 3 .~!~t'!..~~.'!.~!!~~.~..~!.~' SCAL.E1 lie.- . I....<Z!" ,..... c:.c:r"I"'CIl'~~ ~ "',., I-~c#{~ tJ 00 -1:r I . . . . .. o 6 ~~~.~!.~~~:..:.~~.~'!~.~.~:.~.~.'!'.I.~~..__. SCALE: 1/8" . I'."" .. . ,,' , . . .' .. . .. . 9- "" 1']".,.2" . TIl"L --~-"---i ~ CD ~ -; (i) ;: in .l'; -S.T'T'LE ~UTl 9-_ E u)G)-lB4)(S; UlIN ~ CROSJ:-HE.J.O CD 0; _~ e:C:UAl.. j ,. 8 ~ ~. 1no F a Ih!~~~ . 3 <> . " ~ . F1S+l5CALE ~ vlNTL 51DING 1 <21 ~ t -; ;" .. e' -~ :; -:;'J i '? :... Itl\. Fl.. ~ --T~~; ;:. i Wl ;.: I 3'!lt\" ~.....,... ~.~AH 't06' u ~ a"-u. .. ,""",U""",,," 1"- .. rDoolon.l 0PIlQl .................................................................................. ~m9. \ 0- ;r -~~~l ...... * t ,. J. .&:IdL!I.i 8m o 3 .~!~~!..~~.Y.~!!~~..~..~!~. .&cAt.EI lIe" . l' ~o- .;It'~ ~..-.. "'... 0t. llDCIOll"'f~ Iir rDoolol"~ 'i'ffi'5 :.%.+r {l ~~~ HIE Bm o 6 .~.I~~!.~~~~:..:.~~.~~~..~_~:_~.~.'!'.I.~~.m. ec..:oLE: 118" . 1'.0- OM';I:'" CAn. LOU'o Q)- viNYL. =+JAKE- "o~ '~9 -STTL.E ~~J~I~.-. LU:::lJ3~~ UJI11lDOUJ CRO.55l-JEA1 ~ -OR EQU.c.~ @-- ~ 1 ""' in ~ ... ~ ,~ ~ ': 8 -. :t'odR.. I. ]~~~~-- , . ~ ''''UJPANELC 1 ~l-UjTTE~ ~l i CFTla-u:.L (p ~ -5TTL.E eoL TIONS- . ~~;~'NU=TRWE ~ 1 -OR E~A: I 0 .:::: l~l FLR ~ -~~~~~I ;:, i ~ i ;I~'''''' .......,.................. ~. WtOGUl"'T~ D,.u..~ [ill .."" I o 3 .~!~~~..~~~.!~:':!~~..7..~:':~' SCALE. Ilea . 1'_e1M ;I~'ff:V =-....... ...-.. ~. .."" ~cA1at~ 1ii [ill [I . . .. . . .. . .' o 6 ~.I~,!!.~~~~:..:.~~.~~~.~~:.~.~.,!,.I.'?~.._.. .sc~LE: va" . I' -lZ'" 'STILE 2>Ct.UTICN&' FI= PITCH BLOCK -OR EQJAL {:.;n~ ~~~.. COR5XI<Zl COR8EL BJ<AO<ET -OR EQUAL ~ b,12 ATI SIDE PROFILE OF BRACKET 10 AT GABLE PEAK ...........'..............................'.................................... ec.ALE: '12~ . "-"" . ~ ~ . '&TrLE S< BKT18X:l<Z S BRACKET ~ -OR EQW i ~ OPTIONAL .. ..STrLE S< I &- BALU&l STSTEM .OR EQUA ~ i . ".... ~...,.,... MAX. er-.AH 'IOIb' a'-j" ,. ~. .. u.n.cc:wAT~1N '......................................,............................................ o,.I.l...~1CN rlillr [ ..... lL~ - i-~ L~: (i) i -1:1 r..c HIE o 3 .~~~.'Y..~~~~~I~~.~.~..~!!?:. SCALE: 11&0 . 1'-0" ,..... ~~ ~. ...... \llMXlWAT~ ill rr:w.T"'Cl"'TOl 0-. ~~-~~ ~~ ~J-L:r L:t 8IE . . . . - , o 6 ~~~!..~.~~~:..:..~.~~~~..~~:..~~.!:.~~~?.. SCALE: I/a". \,,,,,,.. . . . . . . .' .. .... . 0: __:;.;T!E:~ - BRICK 50L IER CRS (PROJECT .3 4") ; ~ E .. "- .., m I,,'UJ PANEL i 5HUrTER5 _ ;, " ,;; ~ ; 8 - 2nd FL..R . ~ )!!f.:_~ . ~ ~ i . -& ~ i BRICK 50L IER i CR5 rpROJE T .3/4") .. UNDER BRIG 51LL i ~ i ~ =-. l.et FLR ~ :]~~~~ i . ",'IN ~rlQol.l.l..~ MA)C.!>P.6N 'lob' ~ e ~I!' "" I&'_U' "',., 0r o 3 .~!~~!..~~~.'f.~:':!~~..:..~!~. SCALEl lie- .. 1'~0" ",'IN ~T~~ ~ "'.... t 0- .. . .., . .f o 6 ~~~.~.I.~~~~:..:.~~.~~:>..~.~:.~.~.'!'.I.'?~..... SC.ALE: 1/8" . r~rZl" E3RICK! (PROJE 18",.. 24" WINDOUJ .6LACK OP.AalJE BACK 5T.oNDA'RO COND1T10l"t CLEAR viSION GLASS ."l:'" AT vAUL.T CEILING OPTI I I BRICK SILL (.LOPE TO UlA.H) --~, r..~f. l,,""uJ PANEL SHUnEF<5 ~ 1 ! BRICK SILL fSI-OPE TO U.lA5 ) B1<ICK. SOLDIER CRS----..... c (PROJECT 3/4 "; '" ... ~ 2nd FLR "I" -- ~ .~~_-;:1:":-__4 , . BRICK &oLDIER CR5_ . (PROJECT 3/4") ~ WI KEYS TCt-lE .. ~ BRICK SILL ~ I.LOP!; TO UlA. J ~ ~ ;: .. ~ '" '" BRICK SOLDIER eRS- t (PROJECT 3/4") --- ~ :". ~ .::::. l~t FLR '&r--' n. ~ ~ T A'NDTN ,. i ~ " . , , CITY OF ~ . HOPK\NS May 29,2002 Planning Report 02-93 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT REGENCY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 02-51 , approving a preliminary/final plat for the Regency Development. At the Zoning and Planning meeting Mr. Thompson moved and Ms. Halverson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ02-15, recommending approval of a preliminary/final plat for the Regency Development. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. The applicant, The Beard Group, is proposing to construct a residential development on the parking lots of Alliant Tech, north of Second Street N.E. These parking lots are currently zoned R-I-A, single and two-family high density, and R-I-C, single-family medium density. This residential development is proposed to consist of 38 townhomes and 28 single-family homes. The single-faml1y homes will have a lot size similar to lots in north Hopkins and have the appearance of an historic horne, Some of the homes will have front porches, and . the garages will be in the rear. Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? . Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? . What are the specifics of the plat? . Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? . Will a park dedication fee be required? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportinl! Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Preliminary/Final Plat . Resolution 02-51 Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: YIN Source: - . Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: . . CR02-93 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is R-I-A, Single and Two Family High Density, and R-I-C, Single Family Medium Density. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential. The zoning and the land use comply with the proposed uses. The applicant has applied for an overlay zoning to PUD. . Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? A PUD zoning allows flexibility with the zoning requirements. The width for the single- family home lots is 36 feet, and the length varies from 95 to 100 feet. The townhome lot size will be the footprint of the building. These lots vary in size from 22 to 38 feet in width and 77 to 81 feet in length. . What are the specifics of the plat? All homes will be platted on their lots. The area not owned by the homeowners will be part of the Association, There will be 20-foot alleys constructed and they will all be private. . There will be a new 25-foot road constructed between Van Buren and Tyler that will also be a private road. . Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? The plat as proposed needs to show a ten-foot drainage and utility easement adjacent to all City streets. . Will a park dedication fee be required? A park dedication fee will be required. This fee will be collected when each building permit is granted. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson gave an overview of the development. Bill Beard, Paul Garnst, and Chris Enger appeared before the Commission. Mr. Beard and Mr. Enger gave an overview of the development. Steve Shaw appeared and spoke against the development at the public hearing. Mr. Shaw wanted the carriage homes proposed to be on Monroe moved within the development and single- family homes on Monroe. . --------- . . CR02-93 . Page 3 Alternatives. 1. Approve the preliminary/final plat. By approving the preliminary/final plat, the applicant will be able to construct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the preliminary/final plat. By denying the preliminary/final plat, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued, . . CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: R02-51 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF F ACT AND APPROVING OF A PRELWINARY/FINAL PLAT FOR THE REGENCY DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat, SUBD02-2, has been made by The Beard Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a preliminary/final plat was made by The Beard Group on May 8, 2002; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3, That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and . 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 1, 2, 22, 23, and 24, Block 1; and Lots 1 and 2 except the west 25 feet thereof; and the east half or that part of Lot 3, lying east of the west 25 feet thereof; and Lots 23 and 24 except the easterly 25 feet thereof; Block 2, Stevens Oakwood Park NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD02-2, is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the preliminary/final plat meets the subdivision requirements. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for a preliminary/final plat, SUBD02-2, is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the park dedication fees are paid when each building permit is granted. 2. The plat as proposed needs to show a ten-foot drainage and utility easement adjacent to all City streets. Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. Eugene 1. Maxwell, Mayor . ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk . I OZD02 HUHl..lI.'" Lln. Prelirninary Plat ~ ".p< HOPKINS MAINS I i ~ I :::- -. c.- \ I t:..- f\. I c:: ' \ Al C _ F...... R_..IIoD I ~ PtU No. 'D-117-~24-Q05a 0IL_VL_I"!___ I 21 : ,..,1,. ~ .. - - - - r...."~~ll:I'~._. _"~___ - I w~~~'*~~Eh~~~~ I RlClBInJloF__ In C _ F_ _11III PI> No, 11-117............. ]11~i:l1[t:-~ Pm 10. 1I--t17~t--z4.UD.' 2. 2. - :I.. ilit :20 -- .... ~111.71 .u, ..., . - I i r- -r ~ A I t-.I t-.I r- ^ D \ ^ I C_ " I IVI I 1'1 '" c... ,-, I V V ~ JII :::: BENCHMARK':':~::'::::::::::':::::':::::':::':'::::::':::::~:::"::::::':':':::':':::::::::::':< N ~~Il q: ::: :: ~rn:'ct)hyJrunt luc:ated on Ih Rnlth ddll IIf 2nd Slreet ME ot thIS ntcn.-:lIon 01 .ronrtlD Av~ul:, EJrv.... 914.2Cl fcd (HlMJ 29). l -.' 'BASIS OF BEARlNGS:':':-:':':':':":':":':":::::'",::::,:,::::::::,,::::,::::',:,:::, .~~ thll pu~c:.n at' \hili ,u~;.U;;.Sllu'th' Ifnll or lot 1. alock 50 0 50 100 2 STn9l OAKWOOO PARK. ac=rdlnq to tha nard.d plGl . - . thennri, Ho:nnq:.in County, t.rlr'l1'!~lll .. ClQUlTIfld tll haar IN FEET NB!I",34'=S"E. 5CALE Scala: 1 Inl::h = SO FIlIIt ;:;:; LE:~~~~:~::~::::~~~~~::t:~:::::::::::::::::::: o _ IRON UONUUEHT SET AND llARKED Vim UCEJiSE NO. 2J958. LOCATION MAP "01>1 _ SANITARY SE\O VMf-lOLE lGJ] 'ti" .. H'roRNH a.... - STtlRU SE'IIQ MANHOLE ~ <:II ELEC1RIC WM'HOLE S"1ii Cl CATOl BASN = .. DENoTES CATE VN.~ I~~I -, - .. DENOTES WATER UNE -\>0-:0 DENOTES S>>.ITARY SEYlER UNE -\>0"'- .. Doml[S STORt.! SEWER UHE -lJE - "" DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELEClRlC UNE -uc- ... UENOl[S UNDERGROUND CAS UNE ~ i "" ..,""'''' I -lIT -.. DENOTES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNE - ,,- _ DENOlES RESTRICTm ACCESS SECTION 19. TOIINSHIP 117. ucr .. DENOlES ElECTRIC lRAHSf"Dfl),lEH BOX RANGE 21 q _ OmDltS UCliT Pa..E HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA a .. DENOTES TD..E:PHONE PEDESTAL e ... DENOTES AR CONDIllONING!HEATINC UNIT -- L . KNOW ALL MEN BY 1HESE PRESENTS: That Hopkins Mainstreet II. L.L.C., a Minnesota limited Iiabil corporation, fee simple owner of the following described property situated in the County of Henne State of Minnesota, to wit: Lots 1, 2, 22. 23, and 24, Black 1; and Lots 1 and 2 except the West 25 feet thereof; an, east half of that part of Lot 3, lying East of the West 25 feet thereof: and Lots 23 and 2 the Easterly 25 feet thereof, Block 2 all in STEVENS' OAKWOOD PARK, according to the reI plot thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota. Has caused the some to be surveyed and plotted os REGENCY and does hereby donate and dedie the public far public use forever the drainage and utility easements os shown on this plot. In witness whereof said Hopkins Mainstreet II. L.L.C., a Minnesota limited liability corporation, has presents to be signed by its proper officer, this _ day of 20_ Signed: Hopkins Moinstreet II, L.LC. its STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument Was acknowledged before me this _ day of .20~ L its . of Hopkins Mainstreet II, L.LC.. a Minnesota "~-,,. corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public. Hennepin County. Minnesota My Commission expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as REGENC',' that this plat is a correct representation of said survey; that 011 distances ore correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plot and that there are no wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 505.02 Subd. 1 or . highways to be designated on the plat. Kurt M. Kisch, Licensed land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 2396B STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing surveyor's certificate was acknowledged before me this _ day of . 20_ by Kurt M. Kisch. Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, Hennepin County, Minnesota My Commission expires c,\\Y OF - . May 29, 2002 HOPKINS Council Report 02-94 REZONING PUD- MARKETPLACE LOFTS Proposed Action, Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution R02-52. approving Ordinance 02-876, overlaying the Marketplace Lofts development to POO for first reading. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Mr. Thompson moved and Ms. Allen seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ02-09, recommending approval of Ordinance 02-876, overlaying the Marketplace Lofts development to PUD. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. The applicant, The Cornerstone Group, is proposing to construct a condominium and retail development on the south side of Mainstreet between Seventh and Eighth A venues. There is proposed to be 14,148 square feet of retail on the first floor and 47 condominiums on three floors above the retail. The condominiums will be owner-occupied. The units will be loft-style with open floor plans . and nine to ten-foot ceilings. The units will range in size from 683 square feet to 1638 square feet. The price per unit will be approximately $125,000 to $300,000, There will also be a community room on the second floor for the residents. Primary Issues to Consider. . How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site, and what is the existing zoning? . What does the Planned Unit Development zoning allow? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportioe Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Site Plan . Resolution 02-52 . Ordinance 02-876 if IJ Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: YIN - Source: . Related Documents (elP, ERP, etc.): Notes: -- ---- - - -- -- -- -- -- -~ - CR02-52 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site, and what is tbe existing zoning? The new Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Commercial. The site is zoned B-3, General Business. The uses proposed are consistent with both documents. . What does the Planned Unit Development zoning allow? The Planned Unit Development allows a site-specific development with the underlying . . . This type of a development allows for a departure from the strict zomng remammg. application of the zoning standards. The applicant and the City enter into an agreement defining the specific allowed uses and performance standards for each PUD and these are delineated in the agreement. In this case the underlying zoning of business will remain. Residential uses are allowed in business areas. In the proposed development the residential density is greater than what is allowed in the business district. . What was the discussion at tbe Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the development with the Commission. Charles Schatz and Heidi Kurtze appeared before the Conunission. They reviewed the development with the . Commission. No one spoke at the public hearing regarding this item. AI tern atives, 1. Approve the rezoning. By approving the rezoning, the applicant will be able to construct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the rezoning. By denying the rezoning, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. . ""'''''' TReeT 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ..,.~ STALlS l2!.C:) (j \ . CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota . RESOLUTION NO: R02-52 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE MARKETPLACE LOFTS DEVELOPMENT TO PUD WHEREAS, an application for Zoning Amendment 2N02-5 has been made by The Cornerstone Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for zoning amendment ZN02-5 was made by The Cornerstone Group; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed slIch application on May 28,2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: . Lots 1-6, Lot 46 and Lot 7, except the southerly 2 feet of said Lot 7, Block 3, West Minneapolis, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Milmesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendment ZN02-5 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the overlay district is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. That the underlying zoning of B-3 remains. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Zoning Amendment ZN02-5 is hereby is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval of the plat of the subject property. 2. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval of the conditional use permit for the proposed development. 3. That the alley is vacated. 4, That the Applicant and the City enter into an agreement that satisfies all the conditions and requirements for this PUD development. Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. . Eugene J, Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepin County, Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 02-876 AN ORDINANCE ZONING AN OVERLAY DISTRICT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the present zoning classification of B-3, upon the following described premises, remains as the underlying zoning, and in the said premises is hereby overlaid as a Planned Unit Development. Lots 1-6, Lot 46 and Lot 7, except the southerly 2 feet of said Lot 7, Block 3, West Minneapolis, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The most northerly alley originally dedicated in Block 3, West Minneapolis, Hennepin County, MN, according to the recorded plat thereof. First Reading: June 4, 2002 Second Reading: June 18,2002 . Date of Publication: June 26, 2002 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: July 17, 2002 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date . CITY OF I ~ May 29, 2002 Council Report 02- 95 HOPKINS CONDITION AL USE PERMIT - MARKETPLACE LOFTS . Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 02-53 approving a conditional use permit to construct a retaillresidential development on the south side of Mainstreet between Seventh and Eighth A venues. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Ms. Hatcher moved and Ms. Halverson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ02-10, recommending approval of a conditional use permit to construct a retail/residential development on the south side of Mainstreet between Seventh and Eighth Avenues. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. The applicant, The Cornerstone Group, is proposing to construct a condominium and retail development on the south side of Mainstreet between Seventh and Eighth Avenues. There is proposed to be 14,148 square feet of retail on the first floor and 47 condominiums on three floors above the retail. The condominiums will be owner-occupied. The units will be 10ft-style with open floor plans and nine to ten-foot ceilings. The units will range in size from 683 square feet to 1638 square feet. The price per unit will be approximately $125,000 to $300,000. There will be a community room on the second floor for the residents. . The applicant has also applied for the following actions: . Replat the site . Rezone to PUD . Vacate alley to the south Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? . What are the specifics of the development? . What is the schedule for development? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportin2 Documents. . Analysis ofIssues . Site Plans . Resolution 02-53 . Financial Impact: $_N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: - Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: CR02-95 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property along Mainstreet is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated this Commercial. Residential uses are permitted in the business district above retail. The following are the conditions for residential uses in the B-3 district: Dwelling units not occupying first floor shall have: 1. one off-street parking space for each unit; 2. an entrance leading directly to a public street; 3. the density allowed shall be R-3. The density of the development will be greater than the R-3. The applicant has applied for a rezoning to PUD, which allows flexibility in the zoning requirements. . What are the specifics of the development? . Parking The parking will be a combination of surface and underground. The residential units will have underground parking and the retail will have the surface parking behind the retail area. The access to the underground parking area will be from Seventh Avenue. The residential area has 81 underground spaces. The underground parking area will have storage lockers for the residents of the condominiums. The site plan indicates 39 on-site, surface spaces for retail. This retail area in B-3 would normally be required to have 71 spaces, but because the site abuts a B-2 district, it is not required to have parking for the retail area. The applicant will, however, is providing most of the required parking because of the tight parking in the downtown area. The Hopkins Horne Center will use part of the applicant's south parking area. The parking that Home Center will use will be approximately 10 parking spaces. In exchange for the use of thi s parking area, additional parking for the site will be on Horne Center's abutting parking area to the south. There are 24 parking spaces on this lot for the development. There will be a total of 53 parking spaces available for the retail area. Access Access to the parking area for the retail use will be from Eighth and Seventh A venues. Access to the underground parking will be from Seventh A venue. There is an alley on the south site of the . site. This alley will have to be vacated for this development to proceed. The parking area to the rear of the building will have a drop-off area. CR02-95 Page 3 . Setbacks B-3 Proposed Front yard 1 foot 7.12-14.81 feet Side yards 0 ] .84-.96 feet Rear yard 15 feet 79 feet Landscaping Along Mainstreet there will be trees replacing the existing trees. The applicant is planning on a garden-style courtyard space at the rear of the condominiums. Throughout the parking area there will be a variety of shrubs and daylilies. Various grasses will be planted near the building. Exterior The exterior of the building is proposed to be a combination of masonry and stucco. The frontage along Mainstreet will be a majority of brick with masonry accents. The rear is more masonry with brick as accents. Trash The trash area for the retail area is proposed to be located on the southeast corner of the parking area. The trash area will be screened with a brick trash enclosure that matches the building and . there will be plantings on the west and east sides. The trash area for the residential area will be located on the first floor near the ramp for the underground parking. This area will appear as part of the building. Access to this area for pickup is from Seventh Avenue. Sidewalk There will be a public sidewalk on Mainstreet and Seventh and Eighth Avenue. The sidewalk will be scored with three-foot squares. The corners Eighth and Seventh Avenues will have the same paver pattern that exists on Mainstreet. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal has reviewed the preliminary plans and found them acceptable. Public Works The City's Public Works Department has outlined below the site plan review comments for the plan set received for the Marketplace Lofts dated May 16, 2002. The future plans must be revised to incorporate these comments and submitted to the City. The applicant will ultimately have to complete parking lot, grading, and utility permits for this project. These permits from the City of . Hopkins. overall, the plan is completely missing any details. A details sheet must be submitted and approved along with this plan set. The City of Hopkins Engineering Guidelines should be used in developing CR02-95 Page 4 . the details sheet, and the guidelines need to be specified and followed on this project. A contractor's guarantee is required on this project and should be specified in accordance with the Hopkins Engineering Guidelines. Also, a Registered Civil Engineer must sign the Civil Drawings before the City can grant approval. Sheet Cl - Existin2 Conditions . City electrical system should be shown within the project limits, including street lighting, interconnect, signal, and tree grate electrical systems. . Existing water services to the existing buildings should be shown, as they will have to be removed back to the watermain. Sheet Dt - Demolition Plan . Items to be salvaged and not reused on the project such as paver bricks, parking lot lights, lighting feed point, City signage, etc., should clearly be stated on the plan along with delivery to the Hopkins Public Works Department located at 11100 Excelsior Boulevard. . The proj ect contractor, as a part of project, must connect up the City electrical street lighting wiring currently fed off of the parking lot feed point. Connection can be made either by going north up to Mainstreet or south along Seventh A venue South using 2" schedule 80 PVC conduit and wiring as directed by the City of Hopkins traffic division. A handhole will likely need to be installed at the connection point and should be shown on the plan. . Items to be salvaged and installed, such as streetlights, must be labeled as such on the plan. . . Trees to be cleared and grub must be clearly labeled on the plan. Tree grates on the trees to be cleared and grub should be salvaged. . Removal or relocation of all utilities on the project need to be coordinated by the developer or their project manager regardless of who is doing the actual work. Sheet C2 - Removal Plan . Existing water services to the existing buildings must be removed back to the watermain. Existing Sanitary Services can be removed up to the curb and capped. . Construction limits for the project should be shown on the plan so the impact can be clearly understood. . All street cuts shall be sawcut, replaced in kind, and the joints crack sealed before July 2003. Sawcut lines need to be shown correctly on the plan to include utility work areas. . Show sidewalk and driveway apron removals on the plan. . Mainstreet shall not be closed for any longer than a one-day duration. The City Public Works Department and the Hopkins Police Department must approve any temporary street closures. A detailed traffic control and detour plan must accompany any closure submittal. Coordination with MTCO is also required of the contractor for any temporary closures. . Salvage and reinstall existing City street lighting along City streets. . Approximately five conduits exist along Mainstreet for traffic signals, signal interconnect, street lighting, tree grate outlets, and future use. The signal conduits and their wiring are to . be protected and remain operational throughout the project. Any damage to any of the wiring or conduits shall be replaced by the contractor at the contractor's expense to the satisfaction of the City traffic division. . Label necessary bulkheading for storm sewer manhole and pipe removals. CR02-95 Page 5 . . Remove sediment (approximately Y2 foot deep) in the storm sewer line running east and west located just north of the Hopkins Home Center. The Public Works Department reserves the right to continue reviewing any plans submitted for approval and to place new or revised conditions on construction as may be required. All future plan sets must be signed and submitted with revision dates. Surrounding Uses The site is surrounded by commercial to the north, commercial to the south, residential to the east and commercial to the west. . What is the schedule for" development? The construction is proposed to start in the fall of 2002 with occupancy in the spring of 2003. Demolition will start after Raspberry Festival. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the development with the Commission. Charles Schatz and Heidi Kurtze appeared before the Commission. They reviewed the development with the Commission. Ms. Kurtze stated that they have 27 reservations for the residential units and 16 parties interested in the . retail space. No one spoke at the public hearing regarding this item. Alternatives. 1. Approve the conditional use permit to construct the development as proposed. By approving the conditional use permit as proposed, the applicant will be able to construct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the conditional use permit to construct the development. By denying the conditional use permit, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. . CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 02-53 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF F ACT AND APPROVTNG A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP1'v1ENT WHEREAS, an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP02-3 has been made by The Cornerstone Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a conditional use permit was made by The Cornerstone Group on May 8, 2002; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and . 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 1-6, Lot 46 and Lot 7, except the southerly 2 feet of said Lot 7, Block 3, West Minneapolis, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit CUP02-3 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the proposed use meets the requirements for a conditional use permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Conditional Use Permit CUP02-3 is hereby approved based on the following conditions: 1. That the watershed district approves the proposed development. 2. A details sheet must be submitted and approved along with this plan set. The City of Hopkins Engineering Guidelines should be used in developing the details sheet and the guidelines need to be specified and followed on this project. 3. A contractor's guarantee is required on this project and should be specified in accordance with the Hopkins Engineering Guidelines. . 4. A Registered Civil Engineer must sign the Civil Drawings before the City can grant approval. 5. A park dedication fee is required for each unit. .- - .- - -- 6. That all comments of the Public Works Department as outlined in the memo dated May 21, 2002 shall be met and addressed in future submittals. . 7. The Public Works Department reserves the right to continue reviewing any plans submitted for approval and to place new or revised conditions on construction as may be required. All future plan sets must be signed and submitted with revision dates. 8. That the applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval of the plat of the subject property. 9. That the subject property is overlaid with a PUD zoning. 10. That the alley is vacated. 11. A detailed traffic control and detour plan must accompany any City street closure submittal. 12. That the trash enclosure is relocated to an area acceptable to staff. 13. That Cornerstone agrees to implement the parking easement letter dated May 14, 2002 to City staff If at a future date the easements are not implemented or are terminated, Cornerstone agrees to undertake a parking study in accordance to a scope of work acceptable to City staff that will identify how best to address any parking deficiency if any. 14. That Cornerstone agrees to provide the property at 15 Eighth Avenue a temporary bituminous access tl"OI11 Eighth Avenue. If the Lomen's decide that the temporary access will be a permanent access, Cornerstone will construct a permanent concrete access on Eighth Avenue for the property at 15 Eighth Avenue. 15. Any soil retaining system to be installed within the right-of-way must be temporary in nature and removed after installation. . Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. Eugene 1. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk . " " Ii PRELIMMrAR PLAT bi i ) I I l it <ut4&1f]fl~Y1~A C :::zH1tEth~: 0 II i j / _._ _'.} " I / __ "__ __~_ __ _,~#; '~ - -'---'~--~ '--- ~-- STREET "' ;g MAIN ___ --r~.. r:r t,.:,,;,.. -" PllST i - , i-E ~ I' I 50 ~ ~<r I: ~_Il i "'.A 'I I 7u ~ L\J : ?ARea 0 I I'@ ~ ~ '-r.,,,,,- 6 r ~ ! i V:J ...c;,;~~';:<<-;',- ''''' T ." ';;~ '):'->>:<l - ~ "~2!.' "-'--~" d~;; 9'4 ----- ~ Igli' @ C 'gll~1 i ~ARcs. !J I 1 '" ". 1__ ,_., r" B~(\ 'I I iEli I '... '..-- ,-, I,,: '-.1 "" '::. ,-' t:! \J h n: i ~ .~ ~ _" """, I-J "_::~; I 51.,/,,, ~ j (; I If I .-~tp;tG'!lC"":!H:'JU;C1'L;n' ~ I -- \ Y_ _?,ARm, ~ -/1 { J '-'la!"'''~",,,,,, ~ ~ ~ 'I I ~ 'I I _~, R 'WRLb%0'~@@Y'@$h7'@fU/.UiL0J ?,~} 1& PAP~~L F 'I ' f%1 \A ~. 1"', ~ ,g ""=, r ~,.... '" '=J =' '='-"1'= . I I f0 ! ) '/;: .. r fil! ...,~. '" """''' ,~..~~. ..., i ~. F:% g~ ", 0 8 W'O' _=l'~!~ """t< , I Q~ g q i " , I /;1 ~ ~'b"" Il /' """"" '"" cr "'-'-l!< '"'' '" ",. ! I r%; --_________ /, ~1.J ~::!~=_~=,========:::= I! ~ r/i ,,';; I.{ t ,-,.",,,,,,," "'"'" II U10 ~7 0J ~"i I ~ I ~ I = .s . :11 ; t:" .. R ~ Il '/,~ 1 Hnp;"r", lio;:,. Cente" U ~ ~ ~ii ~ " _ . I' I W - ]:: ;~ ,i : I'AAca c .~ I S~(~I':ec:C! ;:= I ..,,,, H;; Ii' Of I .s-;;l ~:i g;f =' h II ~ , ,,' " . ./" _._"._~__. rr. I ~ , f "it I ,L I" O""~l '" F~~l. ,~,.,,~~, "" "V. ~ :r:., ~~;g.:! 1: / _ f.I;.ti.....,., ~~,,~,~~ ::nll''lrt. ii' t: I ~!g: E I ~ ;/,-i H- -"2 5 " !~ / 11:" -;~ _~ . ~ .... I, 'V.IJ /J <"J ~? L_E____________ ~ ry;r----------j-(r~J~, ~~ 1',5/ ~ " I ['l, r: '~I _ I' - ~ ~ {If r;; ~; f f : I"~ f' ~ , , .in} f ;; , ,I · ~ . ~!" J...,j ; 'I uo II I ii:~ffi'q;q;mh<'llh'i'mmmlll;;'; _ _ -.J;:J ~ ~r~,! /' <. I ' r ~, 'I I 1 ,. '! '-A', I. ' ! _ t, /1"< - -,,- _ ,_ -:r ----..--__-1 , ' I """""5.....'~=""~_ . f, tr """"" <F' '"' '" ) I 'Ie" e""''' <F' <Or" :>: l1=. "" """,_., ___, s 1::::.:: _ ~ ! 'I ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '.. "'j~~ '- ~ - - -!fi9'.i;.4i"( - - ~~c-5" - - - ..;,,~ I ~ ;;,~ il ".~. ,~> ^ . BENCHMARK TQP NUT OF H'r1)RANT lOCATED AT 7HE NORTHWEST CORNER or 7TH AVENUE: SOUTH ANO MAIN SlRtET. ELEVATION... 925.55 (N.G.V.o. 192!ll} I . .. . . . J' . 'J' . . . . I 66 . . . . . . . . .... . . . L - I ..... . . ..... . ..... . ..... . I ..... .- . -. . . .. . . . :. - .. : ~.. : . . . . . .. .. ...r . . . to .... ... J& . . . to :... .... . . . a.a .- I 586"4- 27- I I I . . . " ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . " . . I . . . . . . . . ..... ..... . ..... I . . . 'I.. --.- ... .. .. ..... ~ . . L 0 T . . . . . . ~~ ..... . . . .. .. ~~ I . . .. . ::' .. ~.... ~ I ~~__l--~ o _ UllLlTY EASEMENT PER - _ 0 .... - DOC. NO. 5799261 ...... - . - r"- - :-.. -.t ~ M I ..... - :..... . .- .-- . . B L 0 C K -r; -, ) .... . I ':" . ) . .--. -- . : 0..- - - ..... . - ... . ..... - I . 1 ..... - .. . ..... . .. . 273.27 -.-. . . '- . .! -. I - - . I - .r- .. 66 ~-- --:~} . . . . . . . II I I I ~r !lIM_9:i1.W- - m It <~< l2"\~ < ~ Gt ~~l!"! :7::1:;;,... " ,-,Sgri-' .' I ...... . I .'j I 6. ..j.::,.:! I "'G", I . -I I ~ - "j I I "':'1 I I I t , . , I I I I , ~ << << -I I " I ~ I 'I I ~l~ IEl r 'j-; , % ~ -Kns? PAR~ F gl~ I : '.., 51 I ..: ~. P<lll;l!lF~jtclbTC1IIamnCt;n~l>f I , II I .". )% / "","~"~"""".,....._",, . ~i 0'( 8 Optbt~t~!i=I,~611 I I I ~ ~ ~ II o~ i q I c; III +u2.11l I Jl~ -0 R I /JolOli"lMIJI.1:OF9Clffil.2l'trrrFLOT8 , -., ';!?~--------------=1/ I ~ ~y r I ----------- i~.Js. ~ -r--"=:7~-~~:_----- I: I t ~ ;~ I fit., ~ 0 B'TUM'WWS. =URF"AUE: I j I 11'!! ~ II ""'"'''' """",,,' ~ II . 'l:i: : ,- , i . 1Stl>t)'~lCSl~ S~I' -re,'81 == 2 ; , ) 1 OJ I ., .; !1~ I ~~. 51 ~] "" .. . l! j I j ..,...,. .~. r_aw>",,'oT_.."""'_ot iE, , . TOH aASlN tif. g" f' ""''''''' ""-~ ,,,.....,,,,.,,. "" "'. I. lM-921.52 "" =."I.!" Op&r. ~~l C$. NoJ. IH7tJI:rnI 10: I "" """ I j-'"ll .!', : ,z: y ~ (m,) c, -so H- - ~ ' I! I __________ 1"'.,0.>. ~:J'.H:. i;' _~_____=_____ \ ; I laJ ~='15 l! < I I 1!1 i I i ~ I~ I I Is ~ _, 5 ii I , .' .:' !~ I ,,'" 5 - g I ~ 65 I '- I'///////lfj'///i - - ~ t ~I~ /" 51/ I II I I \ " I I I .... tOm> s..... u.~ll>e r 4~ ----- 45 ____--' ____________~::r~, i V-W~P.tylOT~~~1i1o.eoss3li~ ~ 0- N69029'41"E ~ 1- '. _ - II! HE=92it5 " NV-!i!l9.fH. /Nl' SBl1I il 1if:""51J..1.J < MI:.ife? < BENCHMARK If I (N)=>sooBJ lIlY (S)=m05 TOP NUT OF HYDRANT lOCATED AT lHE NORTHWEST CORN JJN(EJ=.9cs.61 AVENUE SOUTH AND MAIN SlREEr. ElEVATION... 925.55 (1 STl!!I R!<<!12J.8fJ M':o:Pl/lO! SAWCUl amJlllNOUS 1's'FROlICURll 511{[/Il'( SElMC<S ~ BE IlEJoI(M!) 10 UNE HID CN'PfD ) SJU/ Sli.V/l;E BRICK PAVERS , I 1 I S!l..VN;E UGliT I CON:m~REN~ ' I I , I I . '.: I '.. .;, 'j" I ~ +~j ~ ~, (^' ~ EXIS1lNG CAS ~E 10 '1' BE RElIO'IED~D 4j .. ':'.:, 1 RB.DCA1ED IJf 0IllERS I ~:l' ~.'I ~ ! <=" , SI\YIC\lT !ll1\lImDUS :~ II FfI-L------------=1 AlONG SOU1H ----------- 1'2'" .~, J[ -r------------ PROPfRlYUNE ~: I ^ po 1 ~ I DITU."~OJ"O ~""FAUE I i; ~. , 1!..p\.lr,.'. I i.""" "","," .1.1 ; I ~ 'I i I , lS1cryQ::rl~~iI!;:,cr. 5!1 ~ i 1 1 I . i , 1 ",1 ~ I ' I :'H- ~ -1 -'fi ::; 1--------.,.",.------ 1 1"1 1 ~ 1 I I ~~ ^ 'J I i Y ell ]21 ^ l I --~ ,li_ ~_ _~--.----J 1 I l.l/I'mSeoo<r&l~lF''' oft) _~ ;t 1 Ra' 0= HI;.:~ ~... IO...,.~ _______:.. ~ 'ID>. to'''''' S1Il1I RE"_WI5 \\" _... - f; flf:-w!121.U ~ t..-'$ < M(IO=!i{!!/.<J >N(Sj:${i9." M(Q-9Ii<6t S1II/f STIPI RE:='2"'.oo /fEa-92J8D fO'{1Ii)-sll,42 ~fl1or M't')>"'Sl FOR REFERENCE I \ ~ \ I ' \~""-;:P I I 1 I I ~ I r , i i ! ! i i i i ! ! ! ! : II ,I II I' CATCH BASIN RIM=92J.14 I I 1NV-919.47 (SW) 1 1 I I 1 I I E - 1 I I I ---___L- L I I CAltli ~.. ---- ---- -- -L-- BASH .cl!!<< -- ------ "'';923.3+ - - - - - - - <<t .. ~<-- ~~-=,.,--- - - BlOCKNiDlIORl'AR ----~-- . - E'ASI" INVERT . ~ ElIIS1lNG I r RaICIVE EXlSllNG EnD sroRII r 1 Jl; ReI' sroRII S!MR I I 36" ReI' STORM SEWER REMOVII."~ I I I~ I UNE t= ~ <<<< ~~ m~ REM~~ << < CURB 1110 GtIIlER - --=- =-= =--- - - - ::::~ ~ I --~-- ,-, EnD CURB NlO I - -=--==--=~ - - - -. GtIIlER REIIOVII. / l:' ,'I : ~=-=~-~~ a- )1 ,II : ~ I I ~ H j I I :snNG51\IHTD ~ i; ~II I I ~ I REPLICal I" '" --- ~ I I V 1_ -------- J i; b--====----- ~ ~ I I --------- I ~l.tl ~ I " ".".. ,,,......... i!i I': ----~ I I~' t-i i r I_c..=~_ I I ~HCO~I I I R1U,,'''. .1 TCH BAsIN I v I % =021.52 1 il I ~Z V=91lH~ i I I I - - - - - Z, V-"0.24 I ~ 1 ' I ----- -- .. 1 --- I' 1 ------ I! ----- j I , I I I ~ .5 ,I I ^ I :1 - W/j'///////d///////////a; I ^ I I Ii _--1 I 'j I I --------------- , ttf'Rt:P ~15 C~;';,~.~~~ 11<< ". ~ - SM/ ~ m-..< INV-911.3+ p F.f"'2~4J" (E) '" /IN (H)=sa9.6J INV=910.54 :;=:~ <<,~<< v.. (S JifIllJltJ <s IJEM) S1JIH Rf=9ZS.W SfNH ltrV=9ta.ot RE-924.00 1HY~1'.lJ2 ....f</'F9I1.51 1'14INS7'~e-1' Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q .3'J'lI>~^t:s,8r. ""'-<Sr,1-/c:.J l! I / \ / / \ f ( I f i ) -7j ;If,,,g2lM ~!1;7.81!, I !J24 / I . "..... -- ~ ,al~L,__._~.__ ------- - 1w\ :7~<- ;;;~Y;~1 !! 1 I /1 ~"., >...."'/ r;::;\"".-t-r- (;AS. -, .,'l,: ! 1 i I \ "-'" \ '"'" I Ji .. ~ _ ~ +-~_ I I~ 17 i, f - - c~ - I ~ I ~:. ~ i- i- I;'; , I I ., I <! I / I I I ~ I~ " F.F.E.=924.40 g I ~ 0 I ~ I I ,'!j ~ i \ '''t<J..mJ I~ ~ iIi T. '" fl I t;+ I I - ",'" Iv '" I ~v I .t'<4.1Q n c ."J 92'" I I "'" ~ I I Ii I I " I fa ~ ~ +52'- ~ II ~ ."., .J I I I I I I ~ATCH I StA.$S ~ RiJ.F92J.J4 < ., I I I I ! << f:q -I I ~! I I ~ I I v II : r@@/.@.@@/@@&&.@@1 : ^ v 11 I I ~ II I t ~ !. - I II ~ ---------nr.., ^~} ~ I ^.z;' J I \~ '~ "__c.~ [ I ' jj l ""--' , : € I II , I ~~~".+ I I i :%1 ~ v.,-V...5t1n I 9 Lf 12- RCP ~ ~ ~ I Ii :JtN"'~W2 I +=l2.c: I I n________~_ I 1-1 -c8MH=5-----~---h I I~ 1 I' -,~"' I ~ srnUClURE '~ / I RE=921.70 is I I ~ INY (N)= 916.70 J ~"@z:.7mm/l'i'/m~/7/P/,7am~ I I I INY (El= 910,29 11i I ~ r.d II I II ,n____ __n --- ~I_ _ _ _ ~L I II !I a .fa _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - -~.; ~S-:l.{'"'' ... .....m M'"cp i:<::1.5;1r"" IQ<<~ Itl'RCl" ffiM...92nJ4. & I iNV-...911.J4 ; U:) .. i,'-N",gHJ.5+ <:ni!{ I (5) Ff...s-.:l:!! I << "o"~ << i.''t= , '-Jtll.i[J..' BENCHMARK nn: (N)"'<${E.lU --f .) i!N(S)..SiJ9.~ I "-"""" TOP NUT OF HYDRANT lOCATED AT THE NORlHYl UtV(f}~rJCS.61 \ I AVENUE SOUTH AND MAIN STREET. ElEVATION = I STtfl.! L~... ~~Zle.J RE.r<'e~f.k) ; :N;'~ir).Cl ffii':{~""9;r.1'.2~-"- fffi~ (ii/::$:tf.51 F:\ENG\63740\001 \04\GRADING.DWG, 05/08/2002 11:00:31 / \_mm~ f SANlTIJlY SEWER UNE f j i I ) Si>IH~ ~~~ '1 I _.:'~ / Is.""... l __--r. ,....- -r--!~-""'- ! ~ : ~. .,'''''' -" .' ""~/~~ \r-l..-- -----.-".. ~ ~l ;;':;':;;rr' ;; ~:.~ 'l<~ \, =. :. - to"' *~"1 ";;:) I )' ~GAs:-G/l.f -- ''''N4T G^, - ".-' ~; '"'' '1 \ ''''''' \ \ !i \ I \~!I t~;' c-- I ~\ II ~ .. II I I \. "l\~ I I ~!, I I : 1 ~ ~t f \ F.F.E.==924.40 ~ i I ~ \ ill' i! +.= I I !:l'~ l5 I I ~ III E I I" !II ~ I G+ I ,;, ~ I':';' h I I I ~ \ ! Ii::, "------.. i , \ IJlg 1 I ~ ~ '1-1 ......., "ZI." I : ~t k'~ ~ ~ I - -U-l==itiU- -Il I~ ~UNDERGROUND - J!T ________~~~~~~L--~---~~~----------- I I "- _r '" Yi I I lOCATION TO ':.i II' DEItRllINED "'I ' : rmb0'mm&""'mtd&Jmm~0l I '" I ~ I0,T I ~ .~ I I ~___________ I hI 0\ ~ I %1 ;; .~ j:: if I I 1;'i I ~~ Hcpk!:;:..E";r.e~ [0/ !ll ' I "' ~J, ""1'"--'" "'"' i%: .! I I @ I Ir'iJ ~~I 0 I I v/, . TO< a'SIN'; ~ · '~ ~ IA-st'.52 ~.... I, I r: ~ .rN~s'lN~ I ~ I i I . 0.tN"91o.14 S 1! I !:- ~Cl I ~__________("'_r. Lil______________ I 11 y'j,' ~.I r~ ~=.. I I &J, ~ ~! I I j I ~ ~ ~ II 1,11 1- l~ I II l i I I ~ 6r. I ~!t'l/l,71!.Tff77&iUdl-17/1J7.t.7lLZZl'~21 !-I ). I 1-- e,LI,l; -- -- ---.- \ I ...,...._1 '0\ "to 1--------' I . '\.=. "... ("~..~. ,. /+".'1-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~f. 1&";; !:<l::. r':1, :~w~...-=..~~<<.. ..~-=:._,.~ IQ CATCH 8ASiW'" tln.,S:C ~1!J"'!)W,7..t & ttlv"'uu::..... tI: ".,f/ts / :j~":~-~ ~" iN M~eJ _/ <<l~ <:< -, - .W iJil.:t BENCHMARK ~t:f (S~_6e \ I ) (t." ~~ TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT lHE NORTl-lWEST EN (4",,{l{J!;,iU 1 j - AVENUE SOuTH AND MAIN STREET. ELEVAllON '" ~.:. I I \ S!W ;e",fJ~~ ! - f:::'%f5: ~~~;;~::;;_-1 .__ _ -F+\8'JG\63749\flG1-\04\l:mbIP(,.gWG,G5/9S,Q9W--10 :SR:C, " . , ClTY OF - . May 29, 2002 NoPKINS Council Report 02-96 PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLAT - MARKETPLACE LOFTS Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 02-54. approving a preliminary/final plat for the Marketplace Lofts development. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Ms. Allen moved and Ms. Halverson seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ02-11, approving a preliminary/final plat for the Marketplace Lofts development. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. With the redevelopment of the block on Mainstreet between Seventh and Eight Avenues, the site will need to be re-platted. The site currently has eight lots. The eight lots will be combined into one lot. There are six lots abutting Mainstreet; five have buildings on the lots, There are two lots that are currently used for parking to the south of the lots along Mainstreet. . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? . Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? . What are the specifics of the plat? . Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? . Will a park dedication fee be required? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportin2 Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Preliminary Plat/Final Plat . Resolution 02-54 Nanc . Anderson, AICP Plmmer Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: YIN Source: - . Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: . , CR02-96 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Commercial. The zoning and the land use comply with the proposed uses. . Do the lots meet the zoning requirements? A lot in the B-3 district is required to have a minimum size of 3,000 square feet. The lot will meet the minimum lot size. . What are the specifics of the plat? The lots will be combined into one parcel. . Does the proposed plat meet the subdivision requirements? The plat as proposed meets the subdivision requirements. . . Will a park dedication fee be required? A park dedication fee will be required. The fee will be collected when the building permit is issued. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the development with the Commission. Charles Schatz and Heidi Kurtze appeared before the Commission. They reviewed the development with the Commission, Mr. Schatz did note that they are still working on the easements that will be required and they will be added to the plat once it is determined where the easements should be located. No one spoke at the public hearing regarding this item, Altern atives. 1. Approve the preliminary/final plat. By approving the preliminary/final plat, the applicant will be able to construct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the preliminary/final plat. By denying the preliminary/final plat, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. . 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. I I v I I v I ~~ \0 I I I , , v I ~ I 1\ b..._____...d ~ SEE REMOVALS PlAN FOR IT STORM SEWER REMOVALS AND ABANDONMENT "'" v <0 ~------ -- ---- - - -. p Ii ~ < << << - - - -;;.~ I en "'" I co I I Vl I "'" co v f r////IIIII/II/ /11/1// /1 I I I // I 1111 I III II I I II I I II I . . I STUB STA: 2.+71.34 I 'NY=917,48 CBMH-5 (COORDINATE REPlJa: EX. W/MECHANICAL) STRUClIJRE :t:b ,,-- . 39 LF-12. 1f'p 0 2.00 INY (N)=919,2. I ,NY (E,W)=91 D 9 - - ^ 930 STA: 1+00 :ill\: 2+71,34 EX. STMH C8MH-5 RE=923.67 REPlACE EX, (NY ~~~=919,( STRUClURE INII ';'allQ a< RE=921.70 ~-- INV i<;\~QIlQ'" EXISllNG ROUND INY (N)"'919.22 I INY (E,W)"'910, 9 920 I -- - I EX. 36" RCP JJATUJI ELEV i(11 I ! 91a 00 ~ i ~ il ~ ~ i i ~ 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 - rDATE BY REVISIONS RE\'lSION '"\ I HEREBY lEllIFY THAT lHl5 PlAN, SPEl:IRCA1ION. OR REPOllT W/oS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER I SCHOEll &: MADSON. INC. ( DIRECT SUPElMSION ~O THAT I III A DULY UWlsal PROFE5Sl0NIL ENGINEER UNDER lHE LAWS Of l1{E srA1< Of MINNWTA. o ""."" · "'"""" · ""'"' SOIL TES11NG · ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES - - 10580 WAYlATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1 REG. NO...l!l!lOOL- IIINNEIONKA.!lN 55305 I (952) 5-46-7601 FAX: (952) 5-46-9065 """'- 7 REVIEWED BY: DATE www.schaellmadson.com BOOK? PAGE? (1/1) ) l~L~~ ~\~~ / 5~ ( .~;::$2J.$$ \.~~":.~",- .- .~ .......,.. ~~-=-~..:...:.:.:...:... ...........--=- il*9tJ.5l1 -......" HERRI!>lG~E PATTERN 3' SO, SCORE PATTERN _.t<~RETE PAVERS TO ALIGN PARALLEL & AID PERPENDICUlAR " PERPENDICULAR TO . '^'=, " w~ ; r';;AIN tE"ti,1;.fl ~ fmb>'12~"\3. L.......go;.1li INv..roa.9~ I . .. j PEDESTIlI'AI>MCtJ AMPf REFER TO CITY OF HO ;~INl STANDARD DET, SPIIr 11 PAVER SIZE, JeaR' e>' ~" TEXTURE & PATTERN TO MATCH EXIST. PA RS@ BTH AVE. & MAIN STR. " C 2 12" HT BuFF LIMESTONE 3' SQ. SCORE PAOON DRYSTACK WALL (TYP) ALIGN PARALlEL ~ND 36" HT BUFF LIMESTONE (B) 24" DIA POTS & PERPENDlCULA, TO RETAINING WALL wi (4) 36" DIA POTS 8AC~ OF ~URB 8LUESTONE CAP. BLACK IN COLOR - I F I 19 ill U \ I \ I \ I I~I , 0 I / 91 ~ ~ ~ .. il I \ I @. ':; I ~ I / I ~ ! JllnnJ E-':Ipkina Hooe CZ1~ ! L1T11 1 ~ I lLl I-I I ILl II I 1 Star)' Co::'.::.<'l':!..W..... ~ ~.. "Ae'N l l@. CD I ~~,~ v. J~E~~~.~; "'- I _ LANDSCAPE SYM80LS _ SUGGESTED PLANT SCHEDULE .~ o DEClDUOUS OVERSTORY lREf CODE QTY COMMON NAMEIl AnN NAME SIZE ROOT REMARKS U-II A 6 AUlUMN BLAZE MAPLE 2S B&B STRAIGHT LEADER CO.l Acer II freemann 'Jeffcfsrcd' CAL AND FULL CROWN B . AUTUMN APPLAUSE 'MiITE ASH 2S B&B STRAIGHT LEADER ~ OEODUDUS ORNAMENTAL lREE frall.lf\us amertccrIIs 'Autumn louse' CAL AND FUll CROWN (counts as 3:1 averstcry S\lbStltutll) C 3 RED OAK 2.5" B&B STRAIGHT lEADER QuerClJs rubra CAL AND fUll CRO'M'l '" DECIDUOUS SHRUBS 0 3 CRIMSON mOST BIRCH 1.5" B&B IAUL ll-STEIA rlist:]l . . CONIFEROUS SHRUBS Betula lC 'Crimson Frost' CAL AND FUll CROWN E . BLOODGOOD JAPANESE IAAPLE CONT STRAIGHT LEADER Acer olmotum 'Blood ood' CONT. AND FUll CRO'M'l , 13 NIGRA YEW 2." B&B PANT '-0* 0 C. _ LANDSCAPE N01ES TOOW!l .. medlo 'WI rll' CAL G " SPICY LIGHTS AZALEA 2'" B&B PLANT 3'-0* O.C. . REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS, SITE DATA &: REMOVALS Azolell s . 'Splc L1 hb' HT. STAGGERED . RE~R TO GRADING PlAN FOR GRADES, Ut.lITS, EROSION CONTROL. AND RESTORATION Of ~AOED AREAS. H 9 WlNlER8ERRY 2.' POT PLANT '-0. D.C. . REFER TO SHEET L 1 . 2 fOR NOTES, SPEClRCATlONS, & PLANTING DETAILS llex verUdllata HT . ALL ISlANDS AND PLANTERS TO RECEIVE 3* SHREDDED HARDWOOO MULCH 1 2B DWARF KOREAN LILAC 2" POT PLANT '-0. .C. 5 In II me rll 'piJlobltl' HT J 131 STELlA C'ORD OA'fLILY B' POT PLANT lB* D.C. Hemerocollls s . Stella d'Ora HT S1AGGEREO K ". FORESTERS FEATHER REED GRASS lB' POT PLANT lB* O.C. Calomollrostis 'Karl Fores!er' HT STAGGERED L 132 BLUE. OAT GRASS 9' POT PLANT 1 B- D.C. Helletatrlchon sem ervlretl5 STAGGERED " . !.IN RED lRUIAPETCREEPER lB' POT PLANT 18* O.C. Com sls rondlcotls 'Mlnnesoto Red' QUANTlTIES SHOWN IN lHE PLANTING SCHEDULE ARE FOR lHE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTInES SHOM-l ON THE PLAN. F:\ENG\63740\001 \04\LANDSCAPE,DWG, 05/08/2002 11'" CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: R02-54 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING OF A PRELIMINARYIFINAL PLAT FOR MARKETPLACE LOFTS WHEREAS, an application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD02-1 has been made by The Cornerstone Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: l. That an application for a preliminary/final plat was made by The Cornerstone Group on May 8, 2002; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and . 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 1-6, Lot 46 and Lot 7, except the southerly 2 feet of said Lot 7, Block 3, West Minneapolis, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD02-] is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the preliminary/final plat meets the subdivision requirements, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for a preliminary/final plat SUBD02-1 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the park dedication fees are paid when the building permit is issued. 2. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval for the conditional use permit. 3. That the final plat indicates all utility company's easements. 4. That the final plat indicates all the easements required by the City. Adopted this 4th day of June, 2002. . Eugene 1. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obem1aier, City Clerk CITY OF ~ . May 29, 2002 HOPK\NS Council Report 02-97 VACATE ALLEY-CORNERSTONE Proposed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 02-55, approving Ordinance 02-875, approving the vacation of the alley to the south of the Marketplace Lofts development for first reading. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Ms. Halverson moved and Ms, Hatcher seconded a motion to adopt Resolution R02-12, recommending approval of Ordinance 02-875, approving the vacation of the alley to the south of the Marketplace Lofts development. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview. The applicant, The Cornerstone Group, is proposing to construct a condominium and retail development on the south side of Mainstreet between Seventh and Eighth A venues. There is proposed to be 14,148 square feet of retail on the first floor and 47 condominiums on three floors above the retail. The condominiums will be owner-occupied. The units will be loft-style with open floor plans . and nine to ten-foot ceilings. The units will range in size from 683 square feet to 1638 square feet. The price per unit will be approximately $125,000 to $300,000. There will also be a community room on the second floor. Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? . Is the alley needed for a public purpose? . What is the staff recommendation for the vacation? . What were the responses fTOm the utility companies regarding the vacation? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supportin2 Documents. . Analysis of Issues . Resolution 02-55 . Ordinance 02-875 {\ r '" _, 1 Nancy! . Anderson, AICP Planner . Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: YIN - Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: -- -- -- --- CR02-97 Page 2 . Primary Issues to Consider. . What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The zoning of the property is B-3, General Business. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as commercial. The applicant has applied to rezone the property to PUD. . Is the alley needed for a public purpose? The public works department reviewed the proposed vacation and determined that the alley to be vacated is not needed for a public purpose. . What is the staff recommendation for the vacation? Staff is recommending approval of the vacation. . What were the responses from the utility companies regarding the vacation? . Excel, Qwest, Reliant Energy, and Time Warner Cable responded to the proposed vacation. All will need an easement for their existing utilities. . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the whole development with the Commission. It was noted that the utility companies and the City will need easements for the existing utilities. Charles Schatz and Heidi Kurtze appeared before the Commission. They reviewed the development with the Commission. No one spoke at the public hearing regarding this item. Altern atives. 1. Approve the vacation of the alley. By approving the vacation of the alley, the applicant will be able to constmct the development as proposed. 2. Deny the vacation of the alley. By denying the vacation of the alley, the applicant will not be able to construct the development as proposed, If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative, 3. Continue for further infornlation. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. . -- --- II 1 """"=- ~ ~J~ ~~ 1 ~- m.~92rW "" It STREE<TT~- l;t ~~ < Q GAS-GJIS-GAS---Zu Q I I I I , I I I .. I I - -- J I I I / I " 6'~' I I I I , jI I T5toryeo...:,..,te8'~ '" I ~ , '.,n.,_ I ~ I I I :% ";! I - - I l' I I " !il~ 'kno- ~!~-{Ji_____ ~ ---_-.J <?cr,o"C'~_<~"""JS. ~ '.'P'm;s> .....,: Q::J: NS9'29'41"E~ ~ 130. ~ 1If., Jf>'>; Ill'<~ BENCHMARK TQp NUT Of HYDRAIrr lOCATED AT lHE NORTHVlEST CORNEl AVENUE SOUTH ANa MAIN STREET. EtEVA1l0N ... S12S,SS (N.I CITY OF HOPKINS . Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: R02-55 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING THE OF V ACA TrON OF ALLEYS WHEREAS, an application for Vacation V AC02-1 has been made by The Cornerstone Group; WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a vacation of the alley was made by The Cornerstone Group on May 8, 2002; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed and published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on May 28, 2002: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3, That the wlltten comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and 4. A legal description of the property to be vacated is as follows: . All that part of the 14-foot alley, originally dedicated in Block 3, West Minneapolis, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; which lies northerly of the north line of Lot 7 and its westerly extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Vacation V AC02-1 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the above-described alley is not needed for a public purpose. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that application for Vacation V AC02-1 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval of the plat of the subject property. 2. That the Applicant satisfies all conditions and requirements for and obtains final approval for the conditional use pern1it. 3. That all the utility company's conditions are met including easements, 4. That the Applicant grant the City all utility easements that are required. Adopted this 4th day of June 2002. Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor . ATTEST: Terry Obennaier, City Clerk , CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota . ORDINANCE NO, 2002-875 ORDINANCE V ACA TING AN ALLEY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: That the following described area of the [allowing public alley in the City of Hopkins, namely: All that part of the 14-foot alley, originally dedicated in Block 3, West Minneapolis, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; which lies northerly of the north line of Lot 7 and its westerly extension be vacated as a public al1ey, First Reading: June 4,2002 Second Reading: June 18, 2002 . Date of Publication: June 26, 2002 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: July 17,2002 Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Signature Date . ~ . May 30, 2002 Council Report 2002-98 Approve Temporary 3.2 Beer On Sale License License for the Hopkins Jaycees During Raspberry Festival Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move to apgrove the Hopkins Area Jaycees applications for temporary 3.2 beer licenses on: July 12 h and 13th ,2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 12: 00 midnight in Lot 300.; on July 19th 2002 from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 midniqht and on July 20th, 2002 from 12:00 noon to 12:00 midniqht in Lot 300; on July 13th, 2002 from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at Central Park, with the condition that Hopkins Police Officers are providinq security for the dances. This action will allow the Jaycees to sell beer, on-sale, at the tent dances, the afternoon of family days, and at Central Park for the softball tournament. Overview The Hopkins Area Jaycees have applied for three licenses to sell 3.2 beer, on-sale, during Raspberry Days. One license is for the first weekend tent dances, the second is for the second weekend, including the afternoon of family days on Saturday, the third license is for the softball . tournament at Central Park. A certificate of insurance that shows liquor liability coverage for the event has been submitted. The Hopkins Police Department has reviewed the application and has found no reason to deny the application. Primary Issues to Consider . Routine license application Supportinq Information . The full application is available at the City Clerk's office . Copy of the Temporary 3.2 Beer Policy ~_tikv~U4/ Terry Obermaier, City Clerk . Financial Impact: $ Budgeted: Y/N Source: - Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: # . POLICY 4-C TEMPORARY 3.2 BEER LICENSES 1. PURPOSE 1.01 The Hopkins City Council recognizes that the issuance of temporary 3.2 beer licenses may result in events which disturb sUlTounding businesses and residents and also may provide an opportunity for underage drinking. The City Council believes that by creating a set of rules and regulations in regard to the issuance of these licenses, problems can be avoided and the responsible consumption of 3.2 beer can be encouraged. 2, REGVLATIONS 2.01 A temporary 3.2 beer license will be issued on a per event basis, each event not lasting more than tluee days. 2.02 Beer sales may only be conducted betwcen the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.111. 2.03 A separate license is required for each location where beer is sold. 2.04 Application for a temporary 3.2 beer license must be received at least five weeks prior to the event. 2.05 Applicants for a temporary 3.2 beer license must be an organization whose principal location or office is within the City of Hopkins, has been located in Hopkins for at least two years, and has at least 30 active members. 2.06 Sales and/or consumption of beer will only take place in enclosed building or a fenced area. . 2.07 Individuals under the age of 21 will not bc allowed in any designated area where beer is sold or consumed, except if accompanied by a parent or guardian. l.OR All organizations which have a temporary 3.2 beer license must use the following method for checking identification to ensure that underage individuals do not purchase beer: Anyone wishing to purchase beer must have a either a driver's license, or a MilUlesota ID with their picture. Individuals with the proper ID will have their hand stamped so that the actual sellers of the beer will not have to check IDs. If the event exceeds one day, a different color of ink must bc used on subsequent days. 2.09 No temporary 3.2 beer license shall be issued in conjunction with a youth activity.! 2.10 The number of temporary 3.2 beer licenses issued in conjunction with all public events2 during any calendar year will be limited to twelve (12). 2.11 The City Council reserves the right to deny any 3.2 beer license at its sole discreti011. 1 A "youth activity" is an activity that is designed primarily for individuals under the age . of 18 or the majority of the participants are under the age of 18. 2A "Public event" means an event where the public is invited or permitted to attend. - - ~ ---- CITY OF ~ . HOPKINS May 30,2002 Council Report 2002-99 MODIFICATION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT #1 (RE: COMMUNITY FACILITIES PROJECT) Proposed Action Staffrecommends approval ofthe following motion: adopt Resolution 2002-56. calling for a public hearing on modification of redevelopment plan for Redevelopment Proiect No. 1 (re: Community Facilities Project). Overview The City/BRA is proposing to undertake a construction project to address space needs of the Hopkins Police, Fire, and Public Works departments (Community Facilities Project). The new construction phase of this project will take place on the existing Public Works site, the Pavilion site, and the parking lot between Public Works and Katherine Curren elementary school. All or a portion of the subject project is proposed to be financed through an BRA-issued lease . revenue bond. Such financing requires that the property be located within a redevelopment project area and authorize construction and financing within the redevelopment plan. This is an area that has been identified by the BRA, in which possible redevelopment activities might occur. Presently, Redevelopment Project Area No.1 encompasses a large portion of the City. Legal counsel has recommended that rather than create a new project area, the existing Project Area No. 1 should be expanded to include the property on which the Community Facilities Project will be undertaken. If approved, the public hearing is proposed to be July 2. Supportine Documents . Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 site map . Resolution 2002-56 ----- \ I .i--.- _ I / -- I' ( / /--~- /- I r - ' ..: // , Jim Kerrigan I Planning & Economic Developmit Director . Pinanciallmpact: $ 0 N/ A _ Budgeted: Y IN _ Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Over IS-year period . - . CITY OF HOPKINS RESOLUTION NO. 2002-56 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON MODIFlCA TION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.1 WHEREAS, the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Hopkins ("Authority") have proposed to undertake a redevelopment project in the City under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"), in order to facilitate redevelopment of certain property in the City for use as a City fire station, public works facility and police station (together, the "Community Facilities"); and WHEREAS, a portion of the planned Community Facilities are located in the Authority's existing Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") and a portion are located adjacent to the Proj ect; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council consider a modification to the redevelopment plan ("Plan") for the Project in order to expand the boundaries of the Project and to authorize the construction and financing of the Community Facilities by the Authority in . cooperation with the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined a need to hold a public hearing regarding the Plan modification in accordance with the HRA Act; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hopkins, that: 1. City staff are authorized and directed to prepare a notice for publication in the City's official newspaper setting a public hearing before the City Council on Tuesday, July 2, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers regarding the modification to the Plan. The notice shall be published in the newspaper at least 10 but not more than 30 days prior to the public hearing, and shall be in substantially the form attached hereto. 2. Staff is authorized to take such other actions as are needed to facilitate approval and implementation of the Plan as modified. Approved by the City Council ofthe City of Hopkins this 4th day of June 2002, Mayor . ATTEST: City Clerk SJJ3-207140v 1 BR2JO-7 . THE CITY Of HOPKINS J MINNESOTA HEUNEPIH COUNTY ,. " t" " r .. I ,. 1------J , , . I , - , (H" -a-UI_ .of+(.. ._~.... ~f' /' <:]) I I -) I I I I . , ~ , ~ , - . ' ~ , J '''' , - , , . c.... _ :;.:.-:::;___...__r-----s.- E! Redevelopment Project Area No.1 _.::!1-... . G \ T Y Or: ~ May 30, 2002 HOPKINS Council Report 2002-100 . Rcorder Bids Central Park Storm Sewer Improvements - City Project 01-12 Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council [eject the bids received on May 29,2002 for the Central Park Storm Sewer Re-route, City Project 01-12, based on an irregularity and vvi thdrawal 0 f the low bid and the other bids exceeding the engineers estimate. and order rebiddin~ the proiect on June 12, 2002. Overview On May 29, 2002, five bids for the project \verc received and opened. 'fhe apparent low bidder was Metro Utilities. The bid they submitted 'Alas significantly lower than the engineer's estimate and the other four bids. Shortly after tabulating the bids and in talking vvith Metro Utilities, it became apparent that they made an error \vhi Ie preparing their bid and subsequently withdrew their bid because they did not have enough profit figured into the other bid items to make up for what amounts to a shortage error of $16,470 011 one bid item. Without this error, the Metro Utilities bid would have been $107,481 which is very close to the engineer"s estimate of $105,946. Normally, if the low bidder withdraws their bid. they \vould have to forfeit a portion of their bid bond ami the next lowest bidder would he accepted, but in this case. the next lowest bid of $133.527" is signiticantly higher than the engineers estim::Jte and staff" does not fecI it is . advisable to accept sllch a high bid for the work on this projt'cL Primary Issues to Considcr . Options and Recommendation: 1. The staff and engineer recommended option is to "reject al! bid~' and rehid thl! pn~jec{ ". This recommendation is based on our opinion that this option will ultimakly prove to get the City a more t'conomical project price than the other option. ") The other option is for council to "(IlI'ord the projeel to the second lOll' hidder ..... for $133,527 and retain the hid hond of' 5% (-:/,550.55) suhmitted by Metru Utilities along 11'ith their hid per the hidding requirements". This option would result 111 an esti mated net construction cost of $128,970.45, which IS significantly higher than tht' engineer"s estimate. While retainage of Metro Utilities bid bond is an option in this case. by exercising this option, the City would basically not be accepting their bid withdrawal request and could potentially damage the bonding rating of a reputable contractor who has done good work un many lIopkins projects in the past. S uPP0l1in~ Information . Bid Tabulation \vith Enginel'r's Estimate and Ad for Bid . Consultant Report on Bids and Recommendation . Letter from Metro Utilities Withdrawing Bid . ~-~.~ "\. ~. j Steven G. Bot, Assistant City Engineer Financial Impact: ~ 13udgeted: Y/N y Source: Storm Sewer Utility Fund Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): CIP Notes: on o~ 0< n ~~ ~ooaaooo O~ oQooaw o~ ~ 00000 ~~OODO nODDO 0 aD ~ u~ODaooO w~ ~oo~a~ ~~ ~ N~~~~ rnonooo OD~~Q a OO~ ~~ .~~~~~~~* ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ B ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ D ~~~ ~~ u~~~~w~W ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~N ~~W~~ ~N~ N~ ~~~W~ ~ ~d~ .. .fWI/)VlW <Fj- .....I,--~.- Ill- II} l.{1-u/ ;/)u)11) V)!o'J- (I),---Vl ~ .....j';!; c:3 In.... tn Ul VI;: " Q S ~ I- ~~ ~ DOOOOOOOCCOOOQoON DO OOOQOODOaoOOODOQOOOOOOOOCODO Il.' c: II] q 0 0 m CJ 0 --: C'1 0-. ,--- lD OJ ~ (>J ..... <""l ~ lJl ~ If) ~ (') (f} (\i Q;Jo r~ lI) -.f oC'l r'4 CJl r--- "<f ((] <") N r---- v Q1 C'l ro 0. 'V 0 0 ~ ~ 3~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ffi~~mw~~ ~~ ~~~~~~3~;~~~ ~W ~~~ ~~~~~ o c;I E on on UI \J) VI :> ~ggaaga~~~ggggSsg~ ~~ ~~gag~~~2gg~~~~~a~~~gg~g~sg~~ ~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~MN~_~~~.-M~~M~OO~ ~r---- Ul,---......-~~~_,---_N~ ,---~~n~,---N..-tn,---~ ~~N~ ~w~m~~~ U1~ '~~~ ~ ~~~ W~~0mVl ~ ~~U1 ~ ~~~~~ -U ~ ...... " 0 .f- ~ aODOOQOQOQOOOOOCQ 00 OOQOOOOOQDD~~~~OOOOO~DOO~OOO ~ O~~O~CQOQ~oq~qo~c 00 a~~oooo~qq~~~NT_QaDO~~~qQ~~~~ ~~QOa~~~QOaa~O~~l~N~ O~ O~ODOD600n~~~~NO~DOa~~~m~aow ~UQOOm~~~NOO_Inr_~~m~ ~~ O~~OO~~~O~>~w~~~~~n~NN~~W~~OD~ ~~a~~ fflj~m~~~W~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~m~~~~~ ~~)~ W~2 ~~~2~ :> ~~~ggg~~g~gsg~~ggg ~~ ~~gggggS~g~8gggggSsg~~ggtlggg~ ~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~gE~~R~~~~~gg~~ ~il=~~~--~----~-~~- -~ -=----U~~-~~ ~~-w~~~-~_-~~w.~ u 0 ~e- g gggg~gs~~~~g~gg~g g~ gg8g~g~~ggggg~8~8~ggggg8~~~~ U~~OO~~~~~OODO~~rn~~ D~ Om~OMDODOO~O~M~O~~~o~~aa~oar_ uQOO~~~~~O~~=~~~~N ~= ~a~~~~O~~MNO~~N~W~~o~~aONO~~q ~~~~N ~..~_IDmW~W ~~N~NNN~~_W._ ~'n~ ~~ '~~~O~ f;~mw ww ~ I~W W~~~~~~~~m ,n ~ ~n~ ~~ :> ~qg~~~ggg~~qg~~gg8 qq ~~ggg~~qag~gggg~gg~q~gg~gg~~g ~~~~~g~~~~g~~g~~~~~ ~g ~8~gg~~~~~g~~~g~~~~~~~gm~g~g~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ U~~~~~~~0~ ~~~~E ~ ~ ~ ..e- * g~ggggqg~~~8ggg8~ ~S ~gg~~~g~8ggg~~g~~~8~ggg~~qg~ (J IL' a 0 0 0 .n r~ N !Xl a a Cl 0 0 ..- N -.;t u-, 0 0 0 0 0 '" '1"1 <n 0 0 Q 0 0 N <D !.O 'n /.. N 1D r- ~ M ,..., co..... 0 CI W ~Uo~~~~~_~ao~o~~~v~ ow ~DN~~~~ooror~~~~~~0__D~~~~~DO~ ('IT -;:: 0 I"'l '""l 1.1} Irl- 10', 41 ~ <Fl- ...... (}) IJj 'Ii') ob'I I'J ~ ~ ["") N _ r~ ~ M r- r- ~ _ 'I)!o'l- Io'Jo m u, l/;o .-...J ..... I"l' W 0 Ul ~~~~1Jj ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ " ~ ~~ ~;: UJ- 1.I"l UJ. <1) m 0 " . ~ggg~~~g88ggg~~~~g gg ~q~~8gggg~~~gg8gggg~~qggggggg ~ggggg~gcigg~~g~~~~ ~~ ~~gggMg~~g~gggg8gggg~~g~~~gg~ am~N~._~~(~___~WW~~ ~~ NO~OM~~~~I-~1D~~~m~~m~N~N~~~~Nr~~ I~ ;!i~W~~~~~IJj~~W~~~~~ ~~ m~w~Irl-~~w'n.q~~ ~~~~w~~~~~~n~w~~5 ~~ ~O ~I-- ~ ggg~gg~gg8gg~ggg~ gg gg~~8gg8gg~~~ggg8gggg~~~ggg~ ;~g~~~~~~g@~j~~~~&~ ~~ ~2~~g~~~~~S~~~~~~~~g~~?~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~m~tu,~~~~~~ ~ ~~ Inw ." :> ~~g~gg~ggggggggg8g g~ g~gg~g~gggg8ggggggg8ggg~gggg~ ~aoocooOOo~~mOQ~66 O~ o~60WOOQo66ci6Qao~aa6oo~ooQoa~ ~QOaD~~~ro~~VNO~_~ro ~~ O~aDODOODa_~~~~O~~a~o~U~~COD~ ~~~~~~~~~J~~~~~:~~ ~~ ~::~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~::~ W~~~~~ ~ m ~r~ w ~ m ~~m ~ ~ ~~~~~ ,.... m ~ ~ e- o 0 a 0 00 0 0 0 0 0- CI 0 0 a l:J 00 "'-, 0 0 0 t::I 0 0 q 0 " a 0 0 0 0 Q 6 01"- lJ"", 0 U 0 I:> 0 0 00 CJ 00 u a ooq~o~~o~OO~OOQOD qo ~DOQ0q~oooo~~~~o~c~~~qo~~ooo ~060N~' ~~~~ID~6D~~O O~ a~~OOOoDOQ~V'~~~~~~OO~I~ooaco~ ~o~~~~Wln~NN~N~~~~~ ~N 0~NOOOOtlJ~D~~m~~~~~~~~w~~~O~]~ ~~~~ ~N ~.~~~~w _~ ~_r~~~~~~~ W m~ .-m~o~ ~~mm ~~ ~ ~~ w~wmm~~w~w ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~ ." :> _~DQOOOD~N~~_Q~~O~ _~ n~~-~{~N~~ODoooaOOU_QON_a_NO ~ _~~~~~~ N ~N~~N ~ ~ ~~_~~rl~~~ ~~ ~ ~ & 0 ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <~ ~~<~~~~~~Z?~~~~~~~~~~Ze~w~~ q ~ ~~~~W~~~.JWW~lli~~_'~~ IU~ ~J~WW~wwwwge~~~w~UU~_JW~~~~UJ_,t E ~ ~ " c ~ ~ w \; CI 6 c I i I Illl! .II;;;:I! ,f !ill!lll!!!!"o .' IIII! ! ~ ~ ~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~8~~g~~~ I~~ ml~l! na~~~ ~ ... 't- ~ C g U 0 rJ) u m g~g Z OJ ~ l; -cr u"E ~ ci r- )-Ig ~ :G ,;'; ('J ~ ~ :;: E ~ l'lJ [[] ;;; ~ g '= ~ ~= ~ tii ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 2 ~E ~ ~ E 'E 2 .~ ~ U) tJj ffi ill ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ [fJ ~ u 0 ~ c ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ 1/1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fi z --- :~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~a~~~~~,~:,~I~Ei~~ ~~~3~~E~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~j~,~~~8~8 ~ ~~;2 ~ B ~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~r~ grnm~~m~~~~:;"=~~B~~~c~',~~~~~~g~ i :;:;O~.if,~ ""~OUoooo~~.u:u:O'o:",,e-~ ~'5~~1i1ioo~=~"Ecu""-E~n"Ono~ .u.;! n ~~~oo i ~=2E~EE~E5~~"'. ~~E~ ~~~~E~g~~~ ifi2gg~~Do~~BS~a~~~a ~ ~ft. .:.: ,S ::: J:", ~ l) ~ tt ~ &: ~ r:r: & n:: ~ ~~ ~ '::!. ~ ~ c c "3: ~ u.i -ll LJ ~ u U 0 U U lD ..:( I-- en U (,) I1l (jJ U t-:- (f) UJ u) ~ 0 ~ '- lL ~ I- rfI Q ~~~~"~~ ~ :" lollllt ~ l: ... ;z r 0- _ N I"'"l .,. IJ1 W ,.. []) OJ 0 ..- N ..., ~ \l1 W r.... UJ '" 0 ,- t'J ~ "<t In [I) r-- ~ m w _ pJ '"' -V '" cP r_ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~N~~~~r'~~~~__rr~~..... ~-pJ ~N'~NNNNpJC~~~M~M~~MM~~"<t~~~~~V N ~It~ ~ ~ . DOCUlVlENT 00100 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS CENTRAL PARK STORM SEWER RE-ROUTE Hopkins, Minnesota City Project No. 01-12 SEH No. A.HOPKN0203.0l Notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received by the City of Hopkins until 1:00 p.m., Wednesday, May I 29,2002 at the City Hall, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud, for the fl.l111ishing of all labor I and material for the construction of Central Park Storm Sewer Re-routing. Major quantities for the work include: I Item Quantity I Clear and Grub Trees 8 EA 12" - 24" Rep Storm Sev'icr 925 LF Precast Concrete Manhole/Catch Basin 6 EA I Concrete Slurry Fill Existing 24" CI'vlP Storm Sevier 640 LF Class 5 Aggregate Base 125 TON Plant Mixed Bituminous 60 TON ] Concrete Curb and Gutter 100 LF . Bids shall be on the forms provided for that purpose and according to the Contract Documents prepared by Short ] Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 200, Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343, dated May 15,2002. E id forms and Contract Documents may be seen at the office of the Assistant City Engineer, 1010 First Street 1 South, Hopkins, Minnesota and at the office of the above-named Engineers. Contractors desiring a copy of the Bid Forms and Contract Documents may obtain them from the office of the ] above- named Engineers in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders at no charge. 1 Bid security in the amount of 5% of the bid must accompany each bid in acconlance with the Instructions to ! Bidders. J Bids shall be directed to the City Administrator, securely sealed and endorsed UPC)!1 the outside wrapper, "BID 1 FOR CENTRAL PARK STORM SEWER RE-ROUTING, HOPKINS, MN, CrTY PROJECT NO. 01-12." i I .. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive irregularities and infonnalities therein and to award the Contract in the best interests of the City of Hopkins. .. Terry Obermaier City Clerk , City of Hopkins, Minnesota " ~. ~. Advertisement for Bids A-HOPKND203.01 00100-1 g _u.__. ______. --- ------ "'SE"H 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 200, Mlnnetonka, MN 55343-9301 952912.2600 952.912 2601 FAX arc!lili'r!lIri' . rng! nn:rl/lr, l'l1l,inllllll(lIla/ Iralls/!o)'llllio/i . May 30, 2002 RE: City of Hopkins, Minnesota Central Park Storm Sewer Re-route SEH No. A-HOPKN0203.01 14.00 Steven G. Bot, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Hopkins 10 10 First Street South Hopkins, MN 55343 Dear Mr. Bot: At 1 :00 p.m. Wednesday, May 29, 2002 bids were received and opened for the above referenced project. Five (5) bids were received and the apparent low bid was received from Metro Utilities, Inc, in the amount of $91,011.00; which was $42,5] 6.00 lower than the second low bid of $133,527.00. After being notified that they were low bidders Metro Utilities reviewed their bid and subsequently found an error on their original bid and had asked that their bid be withdrawn, It would be our recommendation at this time that all bids be rejected and the project be rebid. If the . City retained the apparent low bidders Bid Bond and awarded to the second low bidder the City would be incurring an additional $38,000 in cost. It is our opinion that the project can be rebid for a significantly less increase in cost to the City, If you have any questions, please call me at 952.912.2619. Sincerely, J1h[&&~Y~ Duane D. Cramer Project Engineer ka h:\ci...i'\projC[t5\hopk~ns\llopkn020J \rejeclbidllr ,doc . Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. . Your Trusted Resource . Equal Opportunity Employer f' M"t~ WI""''', ,"0 """ 131> -, st,,, Bot C;l, of e".,,, Dct6. 5/29/0;;' Tlm6 1158 16 PM Pa g6 I 0' 1 May 29) 2002 n VIA FAX.. (Followed by Mail) 95293'-1834 Mr. Steve Bot CITY OF HOPKINS 1010 FIRST STREET SOUTH HOPKINS) MN 55343 Re: . Centnl Park Storm. Sewer Re-routiog City Project No. 01-12 . Mr. Bot~ Due to an error in preparation, we regretfully withdraw our bid of this date. Item No. 44 (Slurry Fill Existing CMP Storm Sewer) was bid @ 53.00 with intention to be $30.00 Thank you for the opportunity and consideration. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully. . C])a.h \J~ Dale VanNurden METRO UTILITIES, INC. xc; Duane Cramer ISEH 952912-2619 DVN:sjc . I METRO UTlLmES,INC. 3026 HARBOR LANE, STE.m1 PLYMOUTH, MN &&44'1 (163) 5$$-1911 . FAX (763) 663-2011 ..------.- ,.- -. --- ---.- - -- ---- .---.... . , G \ T Y OF ~ . May 30, 2002 HOPKINS Council Report 2002-101 Approve Easement Agreement Between the City of Hopkins and Hovander Foods, Inc. Proposed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council approve an Grant of Easement Agreement between the City of Hopkins and Hovander Foods, Inc., and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sif.!:n and execute the agreement. Overview For many years the southern parking lot of the Hovander Foods building (now occupied by Hance Hardware) has served a public interest to Hopkins as both a parking lot extension from City Parking Lot 600 and as an alleyway connecting 101h A venue North thru Lot 600 to 9lh A venue North. A few ycars ago, the agreement between ]-Iovander Foods and the City of Hopkins for use and maintenance of this area expired. Since the time that the agreement expired. thc City has continued to use and maintain the area on a verbal agreement basis. When it recently came time to reconstruct Lot 600, the City offered to also reconstruct the south parking lot area of the Hovander Foods building, if Hovandcr Foods would grant the City a permanent easement for the alleyway area. Hovandcr Foods declined the City's oiler so that they could retain more flexibility for potential future developmcnt of the property. Subsequently_ Lot 600 was reconstructed last year and the Hovander Foods south parking lot was not included in the project area. . As Lot 600 was being reconstructed, Phil Hovander of Hovander Foods expressed an interest in granting the City an casement for a period of seven years if the City would continue to maintain the parking lot and alleyway in a manner consistent with the other City owned parking Jots. Following a number of discussions, an easement agreement was drafted by the Hopkins City Attorney's Office that wiIl establish the City rights to the easement area in exchange for the City maintaining the area. The most significant City cost for maintenancc of this area, as included in the agreement, is for the seal coating of the easement area in 2002, which is estimated to cost $1.500. Primary Issues to Consider . Cost, City Benefit. and Recommendation: The City has an adequate amount budgeted in the 2002 seal coat budget to pay for scal coating this additional area and statl feels that the City benefit though the use of this alleyway and parking lot far outweighs the added maintenance cost for the City and recommcnds approval of this agreement. Supportinf.!: Information . Agreemcnt 2tt~:&..~r- . Steven G. Bot. Assistant City Engineer Financial Impact: $ 1,500 for "100"1 seal coat Budgeted: Y IN ~ Source: General Fund Seal Coating Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): '002 City Budget Notes: Minor annual plowing, patching, and miscellaneous maintenance costs also factor into this agreement. . GRANT OF EASEMENT Hovander Foods, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ('"Grantor"), for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, convey and quit claim to the City of Hopkins, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota ('"Grantee") a non-exclusive Easement for public parking, driveway and access purposes over, under and across the easement area legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the '"Easement"). The Easement affects and burdens real property owned by Grantor, which is legally describcd in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Burdened Property"). The Easement is granted upon and subject to the conditions and limitations stated below. . 1. Maintenance, Repair and Restoration. Grantee shall scal coat all of the paved surfaces within the Easement on or before November 1,2002. Grantee shall also restripe all of the parking stalls located in the Easement by November 1, 2002. Such work shall be performed using the mcthods and materials cllstomarily used by the Grantee for seal coating and striping public parking lots. Thereafter, Grantee shall also seal coat, maintain and repair the parking and driveway surfaces within thc Easement in accordancc with the maintenance and repair intervals and procedures customarily observed by Grantec for maintenance and repair of public parking lots. Grantee shall also be solely responsible for snow and icc removal and sweeping ofthc parking and driveway areas within the Easement which work will bc performed in accordance with Grantee's practices and procedures for public parking lots. 2. Reconfiguration of Parking Stalls. Grantce agrees it shall not modify or reconfigurc the parking stalls located in the Easement on the date hereof without Grantor's prior written consent. Grantee shall request such consent by written notice to Grantor specifying the proposed reconfiguration of the parking stalls located in the Easement. .., Duration. The Easement and this Grant of Easement shall terminate and bc of no further _1. force or efTect on Junc 1,2009. Grantee shall thereaftcr be rcleased from all of its obligations under this Grant of Easement. 4. Notices. All notices required or permitteJ to be given undcr this Easement shall be in . writing and shall be deemed to be delivered, given or made when personally delivered to the individuals identified below, or, if mailed. two (2) business days after such notice is deposited in the . United States mail in a sealed envelope with first class mail postage prepaid thereon and addressed to the parties as follows: a. If to Grantors: Ilovander Foods, Inc. c/o Philip Hovander 340 - 11th Avenue North Hopkins, MN 55343 b. If to Grantee: City of Hopkins Attention: Public Works Director 1 010 First Street South Hopkins, "MN 55343 Grantor and Grantee may each change their address for notice purposes by notice to the other party given in the manner specified in this paragraph. 5. Indemnification and Insurance. Grantee will indemnify, defend and hold Grantor harmless . from and against any and all claims, actions, demands and liabilities, including claims of personal injury and property damage, arising out of or resulting from the use of the Easement by Grantee, Grantee's agents and employees, and by the public for parking and driveway purposes, including Grantor's reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incuned in defending against any such claims, actions, demands and liabilities. Grantee shaH not be required to indemnify, defend or hold Grantor hannlcss from and against any claims, actions, demands and liabilities, including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, arising out of or resulting from the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or those acting through or under Grantor. Grantee's agreement to indemnify, defend and hold Grantor harmless shall be subject to the limitations of Grantee's liability, as a Minnesota municipality, provided in Minn. Stat. Chaptcr 466. shall be limited as provided thercin. and Grantee does not waive any limitations of Grantee's liability provided in MiIUl. Stat. Chaptcr 466. In the event Grantee maintains liability insurance covering liabilities arising from the use of the Easement, Grantee shall name Grantor as an additional insured of such liability insurance. The maintenance of such liability insurance shall be at Grantee's sole discretion. In the event any mechanic's lien is filed against the Burdened Property as a result of labor performed or materials furnished on behalf of Grantee, Grantee shall cause such mechanic's lien to be discharged of record within 30 days or Grantee shall provide a bond or other security as required by law to release the Burdened Property from such mechanic's lien as soon as reasonably possible. 6. Miscellaneous. This Grant of Easement shall be interpreted and governed by Minnesota law, shall nm with the title to the Burdened Property and be binding upon Grantor and Grantee and their respective successors, assigns and mortgagees. . c:Ilopcivillr:aselllent.llovander - 2 - . . ,. IN WlTNES~ WI;E~OF. Grantor and Grantee have executed this Grant of Easement this ,J. J- day of J1--1l /...; , 2002. HOV ANDER FOODS, INC. 7 . . /; By (/ ;t;t-'/~J / I, r / -' ~ rv/t J l?- L t '- v / -., ...------.-.. Its dl--l . )U'i"v.J "- /- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~hd day of ---Pl-Q~---------_. 2002, by _2bi_l~__LU~11Cl1UQdBL___, the '-:;y ~i('(J r~-Trmci..t rer of Hovander Foods, Inc. Q )2rILL R_~)~/u 8J ~,,^^^^^^j',^,', ^^1i........I"I./\/\A.^^/\A.I......I'v\J\J.v.../\J\,'\I\.1li Notary Public . I ,"" "CBRA R SKATTER I :'~>,f; NOTARY PUBLIC MINfIE~OTA "~'~:;;:" MY COMf.,:iSSION EXPIRES 1.31.2005 CITY OF HOPKINS :llVli R By Its ---1iJ Ir '1 OP- By Its C-TV ,N).J\;uP. (~E~ ..1_ I . c: l-IopciVII\Eascment.llovandcr .., - -' - . ST A TE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2002, by and --------------------~--- -------------------------~ the and -------~-------------------- --_.._-------------~-------- , respectively, ofthe City of Hopkins, a munici pal corporation, under the laws of Mim1esota, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Jeremy S. Steiner Miller, Steiner & Curtiss, P.A. 400 Wells Fargo Bank Building 1011 First Street South . Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 I . c: 1-lopcivil\Easemcnt.llovander - 4 - . EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF B1JRDENED PROPERTY Parcell: Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 953. Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel 2: Lots 1 to 5 inclusive and the North 5 feet of Lot 6 and that part of the East Half of the adjoining vacated alley in Block 68 lying betwecn the extensions across it of the North line of said Lot 1 and the South line of North 5 feet of said Lot 6, Block 68, "West Minneapolis Second Division." Tract B is subject to a reservation by the State of Minnesota of mineral and mineral rights. . . c. HOl'cLvil\Fasement. Huvandcr - 6 - --" - CITY OF . . ., ~ HOPKINS . May 31,2002 Council Report 2002-102 Approve MnOOT Agreement for Maintenance of Excelsior Boulevard Landscape Improvements Proposed Action. Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Move that Council approve Excelsior Boulevard streetscape maintenance aqreement between the City of Hopkins and Minnesota Oept of Transportation. Overview. MnDOT requires this agreement in order for the city to install special paving, landscaping and irrigation within the median areas at the Highway 169 east ramp intersection. The agreement requires the city to maintain these two median areas. The two medians total approximately 3,700 sf - a small percentage of the total median area of Excelsior Boulevard. . Primary Issues to Consider. Agreement specifics . The agreement requires the city to perform the following maintenance: - Yearly sweeping of median pavement - Ice and snow removal, when necessary - Repair or replacement of damaged pavements - Maintenance of irrigation system - Maintenance of plant materials Supportinq information. . Steven J. Stadler, Public Works Director Financial Impact: $~ Budgeted: Y/N n/a Source: n/a ] . Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): _ Notes: - . MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROUTINE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PREPARED BY Mn/DOT METRO DIVISION AGREEMENT NO. MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS 83222 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY of HOPKINS . FOR Streetscape maintenance of certain portions of trunk highway 169 within the corporate limits of the City of Hopkins upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City". . . Mn/DOT Agreement No. 81724 WHEREAS, City is about to perform streetscaping along Excelsior Boulevard, a portion of which affects Trunk Highway 169 right of way within the corporate City limits in accordance with City/Hennepin County-prepared plans, specifications and/or special provisions, which the project has been designated State Aid Project No. 132-020-13; and WHEREAS, State and the City are empowered to enter into agreements pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 161.38, the parties desire to enter into an agreement relating to the maintenance of streetscaping on Trunk Highway 169 within the corporate limits of the City upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOllOWS: I. DUTIES OF THE CITY A. The City shall provide routine streetscape maintenance as defined in Section 1, Paragraph B, on Trunk Highway 169 within the corporate limits of the City as indicated on the map, marked Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated into this agreement. B. The City shall provide routine streetscape maintenance on the above described roadway in . accordance with the standards and guidelines the City uses to routinely maintain its streetscape system, and shall include the following: 1. Yearly sweeping of pavement within medians, 2. Ice and snow removal from medians when necessary 3. Repair or replacement of damaged or settled pavement within medians 4. Maintenance of landscape irrigation system within medians 5. Maintenance and replacement of landscape plants within medians. 6. All within the areas designated by Exhibit A. C. The City shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials, supplies, tools, and other items necessary for the performance of the services to be provided for by the City under this Agreement. D. All materials used by the City in the performance of the work under this Agreement shall conform to the requirements of the current edition of the Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction, and any subsequent amendments thereto. II. CONSIDERATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT A. No payment will be made as a result of this Agreement. 111. TERM OF AGREEMENT . 2 . MnfDOT Agreement No. 81724 A. This Agreement shall be in effect until superseded by another agreement between State and City. IV. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE A. State's Authorized Representative for the purposes of the administration of this Agreement is Susan Mulvihill, Maintenance Operations Engineer, Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro Division, 1500 West County Road 82, Roseville, Minnesota 55113, (651 )582-1424, or her designee. B. The City's Authorized Representative for the purposes of the administration of this Agreement is Steve Stadler, Director of Public Works, City of Hopkins, 11100 Excelsior Boulevard, Hopkins, MN 55343, (952)939-1338. or his successor. C. State's Authorized Representative shall have final authority for acceptance of the City's services. V. ASSIGNMENT A. Neither party shall assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement, in whole or in part, without prior written consent of the other. B. All contracts and agreements made by either party with third parties for the performance of any work . to be done under this Agreement shall be made in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. C. This Agreement shall not be construed as a relinquishment by State of any powers or control it may have over the trunk highways and bridges covered under this Agreement. VI. AMENDMENTS This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and City. No other understanding regarding this agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be executed by the same parties who executed the original Agreement, or their successors in office. VII. LIABILITY The employees and agents of the city wfll not be deemed to be employees of the State for any reason. A. Each party will be solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, the acts and omissions of its employees, and results thereof to the extent authorized by law. The parties shall not be responsible for the acts of any others and the results thereof. Liability of State shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736 and the liability of the City shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal remedies each party may have for the other . 3 . Mn/DOT Agreement No. 81724 party's failure to fulfill its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. B. Each party to this Agreement shall defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein. VIII. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Each party will be solely responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims. IX. CIVIL RIGHTS The city must comply with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59, and any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination. X. STATE AUDITS The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City, relevant to this Agreement, shall be subject to examination by the Mn/DOT Auditor, the Legislative Auditor, or the State Auditor, as appropriate, for no less than six years following the expiration of this Agreement. . Xl. DATA PRACTICES The State and the City must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to any information provided to or by a party to this agreement. . 1 . Mn/DOT Agreement No. 81724 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement through their duly authorized officials: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CITY OF HOPKINS Recommended for approval: By Mayor By Date Metro Division ADE, Maintenance Approved By COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION By Date Metro Division Authorized Signature Date . OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Approved as to Form and Execution: By Date COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION By Authorized Signature Date . 5 . MnlDOT Agreement No. 81724 City's Signature Acknowledgment State of Minnesota County of Hennepin This Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of _ ,2002, by and - ' the Mayor (Name) (Name) and the Public Works Director of the City of Hopkins. Notary Public NOT ARY STAMP My Commission Expires . . 6 --~- - ~.._~~ -- -" " \ 0 7Z~r 1::.":3 -- ~ '\, ('" \ . 0 V):::J ~ '1 - c . ~ :" ~ >- 25,J 6 ;, , s ~ ~ , ~ ~ 0: "U ' V) ~ \ t::i '" w r;; ~ t ':: ., ~ Gl U ~ c3 [3 :t ~ is ~ I g: 2:2 ~ ::> ~ ~ 0 I LLJ ~'r--.. ~ Z N ~ 5 8 30; ~ I..:t; V1 '" D :l w Q. <( ~ ,...., ~ I <<; C~ <.3 . !~ 15 ~ >- Ii' : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , " \\\\ 111 ~ " \\ ~~ 0 ,\\\ ~~"'~ \ \ \.... ~(~ , \ '\' :~";::- ~ \2 r.;ri\ \'..;',:\, ~; \ !<l .s'-W ';,h el:!..,. >' i:l,,~ " \'>'\' ~1i;;' u :5<1 ~ ~ \.;\-;. IO~ ~ i<i iii~ 3 ,; \\~.\ ~~ /.To'Il 2~o.. ~ ,. ,\'1'.\ ~u \]~) ~.z -i " i'~ J;~ iJl "8 Iii j;:' \\ t<j ~ ~~ ~ ~ \ ~" OJ' i< w 0 t:::ttl. ~ ~ ~~ '> ~ i'i~ ~"' ~cl:iID "' ,," ~ 1M '" ~ 5 d)-- C _ <l ~ t' 0',5 S ~ < ~~ ~ ~ (\r,r, w'" ,~f..l;,~ ~l':'J\"'J ~~ < N(W ~ 1'. .s~ ~~~ ~ d ~- ~ J" I'! ~ 1:1 l'! ~i' ,,[;; i>' ~ ~ < "' ~< ~ ~ ~ ~ l'C ~ ~ ~ '<1\ " J ~ U ~ ~ 0 \i ~~ !;: r.~ ~ "to ~ ~" "' ~~ 08 tffi ~ ~ ~!'; ~ ci ~ 'Ii lii!' 3~ ~o. AI "~8 '" is' ~ ~ ~ u" ,so ei[i1 ~ w 0. ~ ::. .. ~ ~ ~ uS 109: '-'~ ImlTI i<1 ,,"- Ii' ~tj l";t' @~ ~Ww !Jllm ~ "H e; 6'> 0 ~<:. <:>5/0 ~ ~ m, ~ .cfll ~\3 ~a: :a:"'LL ~ ~ z~ c ~ "'~ >~ _"0 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~tl ~3 . ; ~ ~~;:; ~~ ~~ ~~ f] g 111 ~ ~~ ~ tg3 -:~ ~2 r:J>;S ~ :!:l~ ~ ~~ ~:; ~'d 'i: o ~ -....: r' 00 ~ l-'-~ ~\;j ~ i! ~! ~ ! rn~ <f:I ~; ~ e ;; Ii ~ \i; II" ~Ci o~ \;j ~ '5 ~ lf~ ~ ~~ h ~~ .0." %. ~o: ~z ~ ~[ ~~ mU -. - --': t:i t) "li'Ja ~~ t.:o -:; ~~ ~l; \\ 0. JL:!:J " lil" D;j ~ &1li z~ tt1~ \' c]J' g ;:. ti ~ ~ i3~;~ ~ lt~ ~~ I!'g \ . c: m ~ , I ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I., - - - I.)u u~ U z~ ;E:Q.. z.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ t.J 7l ~fiil t:;J :2' I -=-~ ~ ~-' ""t \ ~ VI ~ ~ . 'II ~ I:! ~ 111 l>1 n ] I . < ~g~ ~ ~ Iti~ ~ I . :'111.1 :' ~ '" z~~~~d ~ ~ N" CLt:'i5wwt1~ Il. ~ '--' ~ tA (4@oo, n ~ n: '-~ U <; <( I- o :J (/l -- D- =' ~ I..... _ ~~ y, ~ G ~ ~ ~ '" 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ i:: J, ::;: Z 0;:> ~ 6 ~ Ie' u..... ""' N cu :z g: n: V1 w :z . a Z 0- ~ 'I!..,; w If) ~ <.) If) o z :3 " I <i en <.5 . ~ '" ~ ~ ..._ _ _ bi 8 ~ ". '" '" '" U f- ~ 5 :5 ~ \ . ~l? ~~ ~~ ,,~~ ,/ ~2 ~ l< ~::l ;;:~~ .l g~ ~ ~ 1li"~ ~'" .::. a r~~ ~~2~~~i ~g ~2 ~~~ g~; 3j;j n zli ;5oEl" till ii. .,," lIq> " ~~ ~ tlori"~ii1~~Ili" ~5 ~5~ ~..1i' ' ~t; ISZ~ ~u ~~.. ~",,,," \ ,~~ w <~R~~w,,~:r 1<~ < ~ '" ~ Iil!:' ~ d ~ "'''~ < "lJ!'" < I'~ ~wo " ~-" ,... z ~~~~ ~~"I'1~gw"~~ ~" ~~~ ~i~ fu~ l':j ~ ~~::! ,-,,'i~~Tdi\hl~i~~ !i'~ g~g il.1i' ~!!f~ ~~lgn~~g~iin' u~:'. ~1ii~5 ~~ .~,,~8 "~'J~"5,,JF.~ hI' ItlR">;i :"0 ";"'d ~1i ~g'''' I:\Z ~Io!~ ~"'l~ <':; ~-1':ifli'!"lR"'"i~~:l~~I!'~ ,,,,,< ,"3~" fi:~ <:3H,,"~ll'<iO-4<" "'8 "'-'I<J "<1i\i we> . -'~Il\...iI\,.,~!lil\'\',;'.H'..;u 11"" Il;:,u~ ~~ :>it! :i.:::i ~~I jil 5< ~:! ~ ~ !! ! ! I lll~ I! " ~ !;1 .~~ttt~~1 .1-,t,~u ;- .. i~!t'~ t ~ 1~jt1~ ~ '.1 ~ ~ it 1 ~ t i ! ~ ~ ~ X ~ k ~ 1 1 1 \ ~ \'i g ! 1 ! ~ ! ! 1 1 !!.. ;; ;; ;; f:i a ~;i::\~.l ~l '~:\~:\ ~:\.~.hi J '. . ' , , \ ~i . 1, \, t3I . ~ ! I E, I . ! 1 \ J ,"5; l 'liI!' !l~, s ,-! L J l 11 '~ ,~! i', > ~ .,: "" \ ! !U;,llluH\l il!,\!ll h\'ll !HIUh!!I,H I . ;, \ ~ \~i!l!l !HI ~l !l ~l \ 1.1 :i \1 r\ :1 :\ (i ~ \i l,il,"} ~! ~ \ ,C:,~ : . ~~ .... , CITY OJ: ~ . May 30, 2002 HOPKINS Council Report 02-103 GROWERS' MARKET AGREEMENT ProDosed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to approve the 2002 Growers' Market agreement. Adoption of this motion will allow the Growers' Association to operate the 2002 Growers' Market on the south portion of Lot #300, according to the schedule laid out in the agreement. Overview. The Growers' Market is in its thirteenth year of operation. The Growers' Association has utilized Lot #300 on an annual basis for conducting its growers' market. The growers wish to continue to utilize the same location as last year. The Growers' Market will operate only on Saturday mornings as it did last year. It is anticipated that four to five e growers will participate. The dates of the market are June 15 to October 12. Staff has informed the Growers' Association of the Raspberry Festival's use of Lot #300 The market will not take place in Lot #300 during the Raspberry Festival. Primarv Issues to Consider. . Are there any outstanding issues that resulted from last year's operation? The staff is unaware of any major conflicts or problems that resulted from the operation of last year's Growers' Market. SUDDortin2 Documents. . Use agreement Nancy . Anderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y!N Source: . Related Documents (eIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: . . USE AGREEjVlENT This AGREEMENT by and between the CITY OF HOPKINS, a Municipal Corpora- tion ("City"), located at 1010 First Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343, and THE HOPKINS GRO\VERS' ASSOCIATION, a non-profit association ("Growers") located in c/o Eleanor Wagner, 5529 Vernon Avenue South, Edina, Minnesota 55436. RECITALS: Growers is an association of individuals who produce fruits, vegetables, and other grown products and hand-crafted items which are sold to the general public at open air markets. Both parties desire that Growers offers their product for sale in the City, \.vhich provides an efficient place for sale of the members' product and affords the City an opportunity to encoUf- . age a civic activity. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits received by both parties, it is agreed: 1. The Growers shall be granted the exclusive use of the south portion ofFublic Parking Lot #300 to set up stands and sell their product to the general public in accordance with the following schedule: From June 15,2002, to October 12,2002, on Saturdays between the hours of7:30 a.m. and noon, ex.cept for July 13 and July 20. 2. The City will provide blockades for the Growers, who shall place them where needed and remove and stack them neatly at the end of each sale day for the City to pick up. The Growers shall also furnish appropriate refuse containers and keep . and remove refuse and other waste material after each sale day. gen/u.s2-3g["~-\2 " . .... A market manager representing the Growers shall be on the site during each sale .J. day. Said manager or someone designated by him shall be responsible for all ad- vertising, administrative activities, promotions, and communications with the City and the general public concerning sale activities. 4. The Growers shall save and hold the City harmless from all losses, claims, ac- tions, and expenses arising from or out of the activities conducted or carried on by the Growers directly or indirectly in any respect whatsoever. 5. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement without cause at any time upon 30 days written notice to the Growers at the address indicated above. IN WITNESS \VHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on the day . of ,2002. THE HOPKINS GRO\VERS' ASSOCIATION CITY OF HOPKINS By: By: Eleanor \Vagner Eugene]. Maxwell, Mayor 5529 Vernon Avenue South Edina, MN 55436 By: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager . .;en/ .~5eJ,J ':::En;l **Please note addition of last item** I Office of the Mayor I . Memorandum To: Members of the City Council From: Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor Date: May 31,2002 Subject: Reappointments to Boards and Commissions I am recommending the following individuals be appointed for a first term to the following boards or commissions: Police Review Commission Bob Miller - three-year term ending June 30, 2005 Michael Gerdts - three-year term ending June 30, 2005 Human Riqhts Commission Tina Jensen - three-year term ending June 30, 2005 Emily Wallace-Jackson - three-year term ending June 30, 2005 Chemical Health Commission Corey Meier, Student Rep - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 Andrea Stacken, Student Rep - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 e I am recommending the following individuals be reappointed for a second term to the boards or commissions on which they are currently serving: Human Riqhts Commission Herb Gibbs - three-year term ending June 30, 2005 Robert Samples - three-year term ending June 30, 2005 Park Board Richard Niemann - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 Zoninq and Planninq Commission Maureen Allen - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 Kristi Halverson - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 Mary Hatcher - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 Jay Thompson - two-year term ending June 30, 2004 I am also recommending the following individual be referred to the Chief Judge of the District Court of Hennepin County for appointment: Charter Commission: e Fran Hesch - four-year term ending in the year 2006 Please accept and concur with these appointments. Cc reappoimment2 ~ , Public Works Department . M elTI or an dlUTI TO: Honorahle Mayor and City Council COPY: Steven C. Mielke, City Manager FROM: Steven J. Stadler. Director of Public Works Stewn G. Bot, Assistant City Engineer DATE: May 31, 2002 SUBJECT: Request for Removal of 2nd Street North Sidewalk from 11 lh ^ venue North to 12lh A venue North from the 2002 Street Improvcmcnt Project Overview: Mr. Peter Keller, who lives at 200 - 11th A venue North, has twice come before the Hopkins City Council to requcst that the Council remove thc sidewalk platmed for the north sidc of 2nu Street North from 11th Avenue North to lih Avenue North from the 2002 Street Improvcment Project. City stall has met and spoken with Mr. Keller at great . length regarding this issue and his request to rcmove the sidewalk adjacent to his property from the plan remains unchanged. His request now formally comcs before you for discussion at your June 4, 2002. City Councilmceting. In this memo. we have attempted to summarize thc history of the issues surrounding this sidewalk so that you will have the rull background as you make your decision on this issue. Background: Last year when the City of Hopkins performcd an evaluation of the trails and sidewalks in the City, a number of gaps and inconsistencies 'vvere found in the system. Many people commented on how t"illing in these voids would enhance the community as a whole by allowing for greater pedestrian mobility, safety, and overall Lise of the entire system. The north side of the 2nd Street North from slit Avenue North to 12th Avenue North \vas identified as an east/west pedestrian \vay that contained an existing sidevvalk along a majority of the corridor but has 2 v~ blocks of spread out gaps in the sidewalk system. Since the roadv'/i1Y adjacent to these 2 Y2 blocks was idcntif:iecl in the Hopkins Capital Improvements Plan for reconstruction in 2002 and 2003, it made sense that an optimum time to remove the voids and improve the sidewalk system for thc benefit or the Hopkins community as a whole, \\'ould be during the construction of those projects. As the final design for the 2002 reconstruction project was developed, many LKtors were looked at as to whether there was a citywide need for filling in the sidewalk gaps and which side of the street the sidnvalk should be located on. These factors included, input from Hopkins residents, safety, intersection crossings, corridor consistency, pedestrian tendencies, . location 'vvithin the right-of.way, potential impacts to residents, trees. shrubs, fences. private property, and potential pedestrian use in the gap areas. After analyzing 211] the t~lctorS. it was conclucled th:H there is a city\vicle benefit to filling in these gaps and that continuing side\valk along the north side of the corridur is the most sensible location f(n the sidewalk. Public Input and Option Analysis: . As is typical for public improvement projects. ~tll residents were sent separate notices of a public information meeting. a public improvement hearing. and the assessment hearing for the project. Included with the information notice was a project questionnaire in which residents were asked to state any concerns they may have with the project so that they may be addressed. One comment was received (attached) that stated, "Continuation of sidewalk at 2nd St. to provide pedestrian access in an east-west direction from 5th to 12lh would be desirable. Presently intcrrupted between 9111/10111 and 11ll1/12111." Mr. Keller Jirst came he fore the Council at the assessment hcaring to state his request that the sidcwalk planned to be installed adjacent to his side yard on the north side of 2nd Street North should be moved to the south side of 2nd Street North. Mr. Keller then came to the Collowing Council meeting and presented a petition stating that the sidewalk was not needed on either side of 2nd Street North between 11th A venue and 1 ih A venue because people could walk one half block south all 111h A venue sidewalk to the regional trail and then head northwest on this gravel trail another half block to reach the . . f 17lh A d ')nd S N 1 Both these options were thoroughly mtersectlOn 0 ~ venue an ~ L trect ort 1. analyzed throughout the project's final design process and the north side was decided to be a better option for the following reasons: 1. With the exception of two small trees and one small shrub. both of which can easily be transplanted. the northern corridor is fairly open (as can be seen in the attached pictures) and would not require the full removal of any large trees in order to keep the sidewalk in the City right-or-way as a sidewalk on the south . side would. ') Crossing over to the south side or 2nd Street in this area would mean someone heading west to Maetzold Field or the Southwest LRT Regional Trail would have to cross an uncontrolled intersection at 111h Avenue North. ., Pedestrian tendencies indicate that pedestrians are not likely to cross over an .J. uncontrolled intersection or walk a block out of their way to reach their destination. They are more likely to continue walking along the north side on the roadway. which is not as saJ~ or pedestrian friendly as a separated sidewalk. 4. Continuing the sidewalk on the north side of 2nd Street North would maintain a consistent hard surfaced pedestrian way all along the corridor. Mr. Keller had called and spoke with Steve Bot as the preliminary topographic survey work was being performcd for the project. I Ie asked what the purpose \vas for the survey stakcs and was told that the stakes \vere iclentify'ing the property lines and right-of-\vay for the reconstruction project. Throughout the planning process Cor this project and the Hopkins Trail and Sidewalk Master Plan, many residents commented on the need and their desire to see the sidewalk gaps filled in along this corridor. One specific example of this is the fact that Planning Commissioner. Jay TI1l)111 pson. \vho lives at 201 6th Avenue North. was in attendance at the assessment hearing that Mr. Keller spoke at and Mr. Thompson expressed following the meeting that he believcd a consistent pedestrian corridor sidewalk along the north side or 2nd Street North was needed ancl made sense to him. Mr. Thompson beliefs are . especially pertinent in that he is in a comparable situation to Mr. Keller because his side yard is along what would be the last block of this pedestrian corridor to rcceive a sidewalk potentially in 2003. Conclusion: . In conclusion, City stafr still feels strongly that it is in the overall best interest of the entire City of Hopkins to instaIl this sidewalk along the north side of 2nd Street North to provide a safe and consistent pedestrian corridor for use both now and into the future. We respect Mr. Keller's concerns and understand that many times property owners may recognize and appreciate the need for trails and sidewalks but do not care for them 10 he located adjacent to their property. No action is needed hy the Council to leave the plmUlcd construction [or this sidewalk installation as was previously approved in the final project plans. A motion would need to be made and approved if a variation from the plans such as removal is desired. . . . <-\'" ~g,\':!. 1'1' ~~\-"t- 0.1_1,11 __,'~,'Io'~ - ~ )jtJlfd~~Ol 'ls,-~--".'..l . I_~;\ \: ~~ I ,_~" :HI,,\ - \1', ~o I ; ,1- "1;1 "',c\ ~" ~~-~'[I-"-~'P"\ 1'1 ~! I :i " I ,'iE' "0\ '~[' - - 'J z_:l,,: , ' .' ~ -=' :1......' , <r' ,I. ,_ ~ ,. -, - h . ' ~A~ ..1 ~ ~l .,,~, '1IJri~~~'1 ~,:~ I < I ' i II ',:~;jll'~ /'H---S'"7'--E .! .~ . F"'" ,n - / . ' u"i~i.,o~G" '\\:,~ III! ~[il' ' ~. .,,,,.. '''''1' . ' I, ,', , -; . , , ' ' . I 11-- - ,.' ,,' ~.__'__ . , , I ,." ' ' . 0 , ." ' ,. I I : ~ r: I"~ I I '"Vd slnons " " I . VNI03 of> z' ~_\ , . i:i I: ' ; i'l" ~6 r, p, g;/,_,I 'f! ~<' H \ .!' [/' ,", ,,' 1,-'-'.-- , )f'-; II ". I :,~'J-... , "=" ~ rI JI ~; I "II -- z _ ~ I ~fl o " I~z ~ . I~ W I~ ' z' . . z ~..' > - ' __ c"" ' ~. '0 ,"" . ._~. ..=..0 _ __ g; " ;j! ~ i'l - . -', 'i>iN013NNIVIl I~~ ~.,,~. o ~ "D-",D1 ~o~ . I 2002 STREET IMPROVElVIENT QUESTIOi\TNAlRE . Mailed: September 19, 2001 Due: October 1,2001 1. STOR1Vl SEWER, STORlvl WATER DRAINAGE AND SURF ACE EROSION ~.A' I have observed street ponding after a significant rain. It is located at: On date: - ~. p.,. Areas of erosion along the boulevard are observed at: - .., SANITARY SEWER ~. X We have not experienced any problems withour sanitary se"ver service. We have experienced problems with our sanitary sewer service. Please contact us. ~ GENER.A..L COMivIENTS/Q1JESTIONS .J. Please offer any additional information you would like to be considered as part ofthese improvements. .. ~ . . \':.e..~.vt ~ \.-0. i-~ \\ ~ li1..~' The following infomlation "..ill remain corJidential but is needed in the event "we have a question on any of your responses. Name: Ce~ ~~ Address: U'O \D>rh ~. ~or~ Phone No:~ ti"2..-\ ~"-b~ · l~"=' PLEASE FOLD THIS FORi"! IN HALF, SECURE AT OPEN El'llJ W1TH TAPE, M'D . IVIAIL (NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED). THA1'\'K YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE. / I i' '1 . . ~ r : "I J ~y .I rl {, i f I,:i , < ~ " . ,i J " :~~; .:~' ~ oct"""';!I"" , r:;' .r~' -, . .. ... . ~, "' ,- . ), ~ "1t,' ~ - ';) ! ~ i I l,'j.. ~,t? I < J'l("~~ I ,1/, ''t.. ~ I., ,: l "l ] I t:r ;~f .;I~ 1 ~ j ~'. ., C'. I , ~.. .....~ I~ ".,l_:', r ~t I . ~ ~ ; ~I . . ~. Z~. " I II f i' i ; . '.~.- \ r: " " f ~ l '" ~ -~'I' ,.'" ..--. I\. , '~\1 1t;.\ , ~-~' lj.; >"'.~ t\ ,.1 ,+-. ... ","" . ~ :::..l~ I ':> . \ tr. i' .' , \ J , , 1-~'t~i> ~~-. -------- . ."" "e{ ";J. '-', ~ 11"" "~~".. " ;~,~,', . r.,; fW-.,~~~~... ,;.t.. II, .':"'" '''''- "'~I ....... :tJ. ';"'r ',_f , .; '", Ii',' ,:' ...,.......~ .' 1,1 ~ ) .... . ,-,'" " . " " . .. .. ,.'. "-."' -;-n._'"' -,:,;~[,; ~:'l't Iiir.l, ;'i.~"-0i,-~,a;.(", "'-'i:" '-. """ ) . " l\~!,!?t:.-;:~; ":,~,,-,; . .' ,'....". ", "",'~;,; '_~ '. ,\..It.,,. --at~ ". "'.' ':'~~~ ~>:..: '" "':' .-:".:" " . 'f.: ~' - ')'-.!/. ~ '~,- ,,{. 111". .,- .,. ~I'