1992-032
..' :,..
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: 92-32
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING
AN APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE
WHEREAS, an application for a variance entitled VN 92-1 made by
ED CO Products is approved.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as
follows:
1. That an application for a variance VN 92-1 was
filed with the City of Hopkins on March 6, 1992.
2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such
application on March 31, 1992.
3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to
mailed notice, held a hearing on March 31, 1992:
all persons present at the hearing were given an
opportunity to be heard.
4. That the written comments and analysis of the City
Staff and the Planning Commission were considered.
5. The following is a legal description of the
property:
Auditors Subdivision No. 239, Lot 90,
commencing at the SW corner of Lot 90, then .
northeasterly along the south line to the
center line of Polk Street, then north along
said center line to the northwesterly line of
Lot 90, then southwesterly along said
northwesterly line to a point 99 1/10 feet
northeasterly from the northwesterly corner
thereof, then at right angles southeasterly
one foot, then southwesterly parallel with
the northwesterly line of said Lot to the
west line thereof, then south to beginning.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that application for VN 92-1 is
hereby approved based on the following Findings of
Fact:
1. The unusual lot layout and the various building
locatiuns create undue hardship for expansion and
development.
2. The City's intent to retain right-of-way over Tyler
although not used as such for public right-of-way
creates undue hardship for building expansion.
3. That the uncertainty of the widening of County Road 3
creates an undue hardship for the applicant.
t ~
BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for VN 92-1 is hereby
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. That the applicant will execute a right-of-way use
agreement with the City for the parking area on Tyler
Avenue.
2. That if Tyler Avenue is upgraded as a thru street that
the applicant provide the City with a plan detailing
where the office parking would be relocated. Such a
plan shall not create a non-conformance as relates to
available parking for the entire Edco development.
Adopted this 7th day of April, 1992.
~ W. Berg, Mayo
ATTEST:
//
~C:(
A. Genellie, City Clerk