Loading...
1991-091 ..... .. ... o CITY OF HOP~INS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 91-91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT PERTAINING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE PROPOSED RAMSGATE TOWNHOMES AND DETERMINING THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED FOR SAID PROJECT. WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet hereafter referred to as E.A.W. was prepared pursuant to MEQB Rule 4410.1000 subpart 3i and WHEREAS, the availabil,ity of the E.A.W. was properly published in the E.Q.B. Monitor and the Hopkins/Minnetonka Sailor and was distributed to the required agencies and made available to the general publiCi and WHEREAS, the E.A.W. has passed through the required thirty (30) day review periOd during which written comments were received by the citYi and o . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hopkins, acting as the Responsible Governmental Unit, has reviewed the E.A.W. and all timely comments which have been made regarding said E.A.W. and have reviewed the Findings of Fact and recommendations as related to the E.A.W. and has further reviewed the standards and criteria of MEQB Rule 4410.1000 subpart 3i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that' the Findings of Fact pertaining to Ramsgate Townhomes are hereby adopted and that a determination has been made that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required to be completed for the Ramsgate, Townhome Project. It is further determined that the following measure be required conditions for final project approval: That the developer obtain Watershed District approval for the project. That the developer is responsible for the maintenance of the ponding area. That the developer provide erosion control measures approved by the staff. That the townhomes are not occupied until the sanitary sewer problems are resolved and the developer has granted an easement through his property for the rerouting of the sewer. Developer' shall provide the city with a grading and drainage plan that shows existing and proposed 1. 2. 3. 4. 0 5. o o o ,. contours and drainage features. Furthermore, the developer shall provide hydrologic computations which must show that the rate and run-off from the site will not increase as a result of the development. , 6. If the developer receives federal assistance for the project, the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36FR800 must be met by the developer. Adopted this 6th day of August, 1991. ~~: ~~ .~/!_4tkk. James A. enellie, Cit'y C erk