COMMUNITY CENTER
CITY OF HOPKINS
1010 FIRST STREET SOUTH
PHONE 938-8474
-
-..:.;.:;.;~
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA !5!5343
--
INTER-OFFICE
MEMO
Jim Kerrigan
DATE
January 14
19J1.
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
Anne Norris
Improvements at the Hopkins Community Center
B~ds were sought for the follow~ng improvements at the Hopkins Community
Center.
-e
1. Provide and install labor and material
to reduce the opening to the second
floor (off of entrance to Community
Center).
2. Provide and install glass front display
cases along north wall in hall.
3. Provide and install coat and hat racks
along south wall in hall.
Bid packages were sent out November 15, 1982 for these ~mprovements.
Mel's Remodeling was orig~nally awarded the contract for this work (1/5/82),
but Mel left the state without completing the work. Subsequently,
Firmus and I rewrote the specifications and went out for new bids.
The following b~ds were submitted for the ~mprovements.
Herb Anderson Construct~on
101 11th Avenue North
Hopkins
$ 9221.00
Air Seal Company
6701 Bloomington Avenue South
Bloomington
$ 9479.00
F~rmus and I have reviewed the bids and recommend that the contract be
awarded to the low b~dder, Herb Anderson Construct~on.
--
--
1-
Date:
January 10, 1983
To:
william P. Craig, C~ ty Mmager
Fran:
Jim Kerrigan
Subject: Sul::mission of applicat~an to state for funding under EY83 Carmuruty Developnent
Program
At the January 18 Council rreetmg, I have scheduled a public hearing to cons~der the
submission of an apphcatian for cansiderat~on of funding under the 1983 Mllmesota
9nall Cities Developrent Program. The activ~tles as well as the budget of $827,000
~s identlcal to the program approved by the Hopkms Carmunlty Developnent CltlZens
Carmi.ttee at a Public Hearing an August 25, 1982 and the Hopkins Clty Council on
August 31, 1982 for sul::mission to HUD for funding. Those act~vlties including:
1. Camnercial Bulldmg Rehabilltatlon Program.
2. Residential Structure Rehabllitatlon Program .
3. Acquisltion of deteriorated structures (including demolition and
relocation) .
4. Contingencles.
5. Administration.
As you are aware, the city was notlf~ed last rronth that It was not selected for
fundmg by HUD. Thus ~ are proposmg sul:nussion to the state for conslderation
as they have taken over adminlstratlon of the Carmunlty Development Srna.ll Cities
Program fran HUD beg1J1Iling this year.
As official city approval has already been received for tins program, the Public
Hearing process is basically Just a fonnality that lS required be met prior to
sul:m1.sslon of the appllcatlon to the state. Sul:nusslon lS required to be made no
later than January 31, Wlth those approved notifled sanetlffie In Aprll .