Z & P Commission Minutes 5-31-83
f.
A regular meeting of the Hopk1ns Zoning and Planning Commission was held on Tuesday,
May 31, 1983, at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall.
Present were Chair Eddy~ members Folk, Janke, Kirscht, Lavin and Tickle. Also present
were City Manager Craig, City Eng1neer StroJan, Community Development Director Kerrigan,
and Assistant Community Development Director Norris.
Item:
Case No:
83-13
4-141
Action:
Case No:
83-14
145-306
Action:
Case No:
83-17
312-333
Action:
Case No:
83-18
334-377
Action:
.
Case No:
83-19
378-445
Mrs. Lavin moved and Mr. Janke seconded a motion that the minutes of the
Apr1l 26, 1983 meeting be approved and signed. Motion carried.
Hear1ng on an application by Ginkel Construction for a Conditional Use Permit
for construction of a two building, 101 unit apartment complex on Hiawatha Avenue
west of the Hiawatha Court apartments continued from the April 26, 1983 meeting.
Mr. Ginkel reviewed the proposal with the Commission and stated that he had
been working with Jim Benshoof, Traff1C Consultant, regarding the concerns of
the area in regard to increased traffic in the neighborhood.
Mrs. Lavin moved and Mrs. Tickle seconded a motion recommending to the Council
approval of a resolut10n for a Conditional Use Permit for construction of a
two building, 101 un1t apartment complex on Hiawatha Avenue contingent on
"No Right Turn" - "No Left Turn' slgnage and al1gnment of the driveways and
apartment newsletter to suggest traff1c movement around the project. Motion
carr1ed unan1mously.
Hear1ng on an appl1cation by Sixth Avenue Partnership for a var1ance for front
and sideyard requirements for an add1t10n to the existing building at 5 - 6th
Avenue South, continued from the April 26, 1983 meeting.
Eugene Maxwell reviewed the request with the Comm1ssion. Reports from the City
Engineer and Police Department were reviewed.
Mr. Wied, resident, spoke against the request in regard to liquor too close to
the residential use.
Mr. Folk moved and Mr. Kirscht seconded a motion recommending to the Council
denial of the variance as this was an extreme variance and no hardShip was
evident. Motion carried. Mr. Janke voting nay.
Hearing on an application by Darrel McAnnany and Richard Dillon for Waiver of
Plat to subdivide Lot 26, Prestons Interlachen Park into two parcels in order
to fac1litate transfer of easterly 2 feet of Lot 26 to Lot 27, Prestons Inter-
lachen Park.
Mr. McAnnany explained the request to the Commission which is the result of a
preV10US action of the Commission for a variance to enlarge a garage.
Mrs. Lavin moved and Mr. Kirscht seconded a motion recommending to the Council
approval of a Resolution for Waiver of the Plat. Motion carried unanimously.
Hearing on an application by Knox Lumber Company for a Conditional Use Permit
to construct an accessory building in an Industrial District.
Mr. Jim Brown of Knox Lumber explained the proposed accessory building request
to the Commission.
Mr. Kirscht moved and Mrs. Tickle seconded a motion recommending to the Council
approval of a Resolution for a Conditional Use Permit for an accessory build1ng
1n an Industrial District. Motion carried unanimously.
Hearing on an application by James Lindberg for Gethsemane Church for a variance
to construct a Sign to exceed the maximum square footage by 48 square feet on
each side and a variance to construct the sign in the front yard setback.
Mr. James Lindberg explained to the Commiss1on the request for the sign and the
placement of said sign due to the church having an address on Minnetonka Mills
Road and the church fronting on Highway No.7.
f
Zoning and Planning Commission minutes of May 31, 1983 continued.
Mr. Janke moved and Mr. Folk seconded a motion recommending to the Council
approval of a Resolution for a variance to place a sign in the fron~ard
setback and a variance for the surface area. Motion carried. Chair voting
nay.
Hearing on an application by U-Hau1 Company of MN for a variance to locate
a propane tank in the front yard setback at 502 East Excelsior Avenue.
Mr. Oon Ogil explained the request to the Commission and stated that they
have tried the tank in various locations on their property and that this is
the most workable location for their business.
Res1dents of the area spoke against the tank being placed on the property
in any location. They are concerned about the safety for the area.
Mrs. Lavin moved and Mr. Janke seconded a motion recommending to the Council
denial of the request as there is no hardShip unique to the property.
Hearing on an application by Richard Doolittle for a Concept Review for a coin
operated self-service, 3 bay car wash to be added to the existing car wash at
1821 West Excelsior Avenue.
Mr. Doolittle, owner, and Mr. Benshoof, Traffic Consultant, explained the proposed
expansion plans to the Commission. Mr. Ooolittle presented a list of names of
residents in the area that were in favor of the expansion.
Residents also spoke against the expansion which would create increased traffic
in the area and would involve evening hours of operation.
The City Engineer suggested that the 74' curb cut on 19th Avenue be divided into
four separate cuts.
The overall concensus of the Commission was that the proposed expansion was not
favorable due to increased traffic, variance needed for stacking of cars.
Mr. Dan Damschen of 28 - 19th Avenue North asked to be contacted if there is any
further action regarding the car wash.
Item: Discussion on landscape ordinances of various communities.
1481-1667
Action:
Case No:
83-20
446-678
Action:
Case No:
83-21
679-1478
The Commission was favorable on having some kind of check 1jst or ordinance.
Mr. Kirscht will put together some type of proposal for landscape guidelines.
Item~ Proposed changes to ordinance relating to non-conforming uses.
1668-1728
The Commiss10n would like to see samples from other communities in regard to this
issue at the next meeting.
Item: Report from Ci~ Manager regarding possible vacation of Milwaukee Street.
1730-1805
It was the decision of the Commission to hold a hearing on the proposed vacation
of Milwaukee Street at the June 28, 1983 meeting. Notice to be published and
the proper people notified.
Item: Council requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission study the ordinance
1806-1866 granting variances to see if it can be changed to give more latitude and flexi-
bility so that it will be more applicable to some cases.
Mr. Kirscht suggested that the City purchase ordinances of neighboring cities
so that they have them available for comparisons.
Staff to check with other communities, those comparable to Hopkins such as
St. Louis Park, Edina for the June meeting.
Item: Mr. Kerrigan suggested to the Commission that a change in the ordinance is also
necessary in regard to Day Care Nursery.
It was decided that the item be discussed at the June meeting.
,
Zon1ng and Planning Comm1ssion minutes of May 31, 1983 continued.
Item: Information letter from Napco attached to the agenda was discussed.
The Commission still wants a total development plan for the landfill site.
Item:
Ms. Eddy is to have information regarding "Effective Meetings" available at
the next meeting scheduling a one-half day session at City Hall for the middle
of July.
Mr. Folk moved and Mr. Janke seconded a motion that the meeting be adjourned.
Motion carried.
Action:
MEMBERS:
ATTEST:
Jeanne Eddy, Chair
t
,
'"
DATE: May la, 1983
TO: Mayor & City Council
.
FROM: Jim Kerrigan
SUBJECT: Pines Trailer Court Improvement Plan
During the last several weeks the city staff has been working with the owners of the
Pines Trailer Park to formulate a plan which would facilitate the placement of units
wider than 12' in the Park. As a result of these meetings we have arrived at a Plan
and timetable for implementation which seems mutually acceptable to all parties involved
(see attached). This plan addresses the majority of concerns the City and Fire Depart-
ment have as relates to the Pines, while at the same time not being so severely
restrictive as to make it difficult for the Park owners to implement.
If the Council feels the Plan is acceptable, action can be taken on the variance request
to locate a 14' wide unit in the Park. For approval of the variance a determination of
hardship would have to be made, which it appears could be based upon the following
circumstances.
.t
1. The Pines, because it is an existing Park, has certain design
limitations because of Park location, street layout, etc.
2. 12' wide mobile homes are no longer manufactured, except for
custom orders
~-
Also in granting the variance the following items should be addressed:
1. Should be given to the Park*as a whole, rather than the applicant
and the specific 'site requested.
2. Should be a variance to allow any width unit into the Park (providing
it meets the requirements of the Plan) and not just the 14' wide unit
for which the application has been made.
3. Conditioned upon the owners of the Park signing a contract to be
drafted by the City Attorney which states that they agree to comply
with the Improvement Plan and what legal action will be in the case
of non-compliance.
(See attached draft agreerrent)
* It should be noted, the application for the variance has been changed
from the original applicant to the owner of the Pines. This action is
in response to commentary of previous Council meetings on this matter.
The owner has paid the fee for the application with the previous
applicant receiving a refund.
t
-
't
TllIIe Period for Canpliance
IMPOOVEl4ENT PLAN - PINES TRAILER COURI'
RmUlREMENT
2 years
2 years
6 M:>nths
120 days
Imrediately
120 days
6 M:>nths
File with the Cl.ty a site plan. 'Ihe plan wl.ll specl.fy in
sufficient detaJ.l, in scale, the locatl.on of all plots,
streets, off-street parking areas, yards and other
infonnation as re:JOOsted. Any changes or amendments
to the site plan Y.Ould be required to be hIed and
approved by the Cl. ty .
Each plot containing one unit shall have at a minimum
the following requireIreI'lts:
a. 2' front setback from street or roadway
b. l~' rear setback fran lot line for existing dwellings
Wl.tlu.n the Park, 3' for new units noved into the
Park.
c. 5' side-yard setback fran lot line. No structures
or parking or noveable property shall be allCMed
in any setback. All setback areas shall be main-
tained as a green space. One side-yard may be
reduced to not less than 2' provided la' distance
separation is maintained between adjacent dwelling
units and their accessory structures and parking
areas .
Streets within the park shall be 15' wide and designated
a fire lane with no parking. Entire 15' width shall be
maintained free and clear of snow and other obstructions
inpeding access
A maintenance code of dwelling units shall be enforced by
the owner of the Park. SUch code shall be subject to
review and approval by the City.
All nobile hares noved into the park shall oomply with the
requirements of Minn Statute Sections 327.31 through
327.34. All nobile hares noved into the park shall bear
the seal of approval as stated in Minn Statute Section
327.32. Application for dwellmg unit nove-in shall be
submitted to the City of Hopkins Inspection Depart:Irent for
approval prior to the actual nove-in.
An occupant of any dwelling nnit wishing to undertake any
inproverrent to a structure or construct an accessory
building or structure shall first receive written approval
of the park owner and building pennit fran the City
Inspection Depar1::1rent.
Each plot contal.Iling a dwelling nnit shall at least have a
concrete or asphalt off-street parking area for one vehicle.
Such parkmg area shall be a nunirm.lm of 9' x 20', not less
than 2' fran any dwelling and not located in any lot set-
back. For any lot on which off-street parking is not to
be proVl.ded, off-street parl<mg space meeting the above
requirerrents shall be provided witlun 150' of the unit l.t
is designated to serve. Besl.des the al:x:>ve parking reqw.re-
rrents, the owner of the Park shall also provl.de off-street
I
.
Page 2
-
6 MJnths
Inmediately
Inmediately
Inprovement Plan - PUleS Traller Court
5/12/83
parkmg eqmvalent to 1/2 space per dwelling unit. All
other ccmron parkJ.ng areas shall be ooncrete or asphalt.
A site plan detailing locations of parking spaces shall
be filed wJ.th the City. All parking shall be pro~rly
J.dentified "for parking only".
The Park shall rreet all other applicable present and
future requirerrents of Minn Statute Sectl.on 327,
applicable rules and regulations of the Departrrent of
Health and M1.nn ,State Fire O:x1e.
All units presently located in the Park shall be
required to ccnply WJ.th all the requirerrents above
within the tine period detailed. All units noved into
the Park subsequent to the acceptance of this nnprovem::mt
plan shall carply with all these above requirerrents at
the ti.Ire of nove-in.