Loading...
CR 06-097 Sideyard Setback Variance-109 - 11th Ave N C\TY OF m August 30, 2006 HOPKINS Council Report 06-97 SIDEY ARD SETBACK VARIANCE - 109 - 11 th AVENUE NORTH ProDosed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Move to adopt Resolution 06-55. approving a sideyard setback variance at 109 - 11th Avenue North with the conditions as outlined in Resolution 06-55. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Mr. Hatlestad moved and Mr. Aamess seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ06-19, recommending approval of a sideyard setback variance at 109 - 11th Avenue North with the conditions as outlined in Resolution RZ06-19. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview 109 - 11th Avenue North consists of two 50-foot lots owned by one individual. An existing home and garage is on the southerly lot. The northerly lot has an existing 22' x 32' garage located to the rear of the lot. The applicant wants to sell the northerly lot for the purpose of constructing a new home. The existing home is 1.3 feet on one comer from the northerly lot line, and the existing garage is on the northerly lot by .4 feet. The selling of the lot presents some problems. The first is the northerly sideyard setback of the house; the second is the existing garage is on another lot; and the third is the ordinance does not allow the construction of a garage on a lot before a house is constructed. Because the applicant owns both lots, these conditions are not issues. If the northerly lot were to be sold, the southerly lot would not have the correct setbacks and the northerly lot, because of the garage, would not meet the zoning requirements. Primarv Issues to Consider . What does the ordinance require? . What are the specifics of the applicant's request? . What is the staff s recommendation? . What are the conditions that would recommend if the variance is granted? . What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? SUDDortin2 Documents . Analysis of Issues . Survey . Resolution 06-55 Nanc . Anderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/ A Budgeted: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: Y/N Source: CR06-97 Page 2 Primarv Issues to Consider. What does the ordinance require? The ordinance requires an 8- foot sideyard setback for the house and a three-foot setback for the garage. What are the specifics of the applicant's request? The existing home was constructed sometime around 1929-30. At some point after that Lot 14, the northerly lot, was owned by the same owners. It appears that in 1972 the garage on Lot 14 was constructed. Staff cannot determine when the garage that is over the lot line was constructed. The applicant is requesting a 6.7 foot sideyard variance. The existing house is 1.3 feet from the north lot line. and the existing garage on Lot 13 is over the lot line on Lot 14. . What is the staffs recommendation? The Zoning Ordinance states the following: a variance is a modification or variation from the provisions of this code granted by the board and applied to a specific parcel of property because of undue hardship due to circumstances peculiar and unique to such parcel. The Zoning Ordinance also states the following: that the Commission must find that the literal enforcement of the provision of the Zoning Ordinance would cause an undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and that the granting of a variance to the extent necessary to compensate for said hardship is in keeping with the intent of this code. The applicant stated that the location of the home and garage predated the adoption of the existing zoning code. This is true and without a variance Lot 14 is unbuildable. Also there were different owners for both lots in the past, it appears that the same owner owned both lots in the 1980s. Staff does support the variance if the below conditions are meet. . What are the conditions that staff would recommend if the variance is granted? The following are the conditions the staff would recommend if the variance is granted: 1. The existing garage on Lot 13 must be moved to the existing setback requirements. 2. A building permit will not be issued for Lot 14 until the garage on Lot 13 is moved. 3. The new house constructed on Lot 14 will have a 15- foot sideyard setback on the south side. All other setbacks will comply with the existing setbacks for the R-I-A zoning district. 4. The existing garage on Lot 14 will not be converted to a home. 5. The principal use of Lot 14 will not be for storage. 6. That if a fence is constructed on Lot 14, it must be set back four feet from the south CR06-97 Page 3 property line. What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the proposed variance. Ms. Anderson stated that the recommendation is to approve the variance with conditions. Patrick Hanlon, the applicant, and Nate Schroedl, the property owner, appeared before the Commission. The staffhad recommended a 15-foot setback on the south side for a proposed home, and Mr. Hanlon asked if the Commission would consider a 10-foot setback. Mike Brandvold, the surveyor, appeared before the Commission and proposed a 12-foot setback. A lesser setback will allow a wider home on the vacant lot. Jason Wood of 110-11 th Avenue North spoke about the character of the block and that he would prefer a more wide-open block. The Commission had a considerable discussion about the 15- foot setback and the moving of the garage to the correct setback. Alternatives. 1. Approve the variance. By approving of the variance with conditions, the applicant will be able to sell vacant lot for the construction of a new home. 2. Deny of the variance. By denying of the variance, the applicant will not be able to sell the abutting lot for the construction of a new home. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings of fact will have to be stated that support this action. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 06-55 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A SIDE YARD SETBACK WHEREAS, an application for Variance VN06-1 has been made by Patrick Hanlon; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Variance VN06-1 was made by Patrick Hanlon on July 28, 2006; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notice, held a meeting on the application and reviewed such application on August 29, 2006: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff were considered; and 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Lots 13 and 14, Block 78 West Minneapolis 2nd Division, . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, that application for Variance VN06-1 to reduce the 8-foot setback to 1.3 is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That Lot 14 meets the minimum lot requirements for a buildable lot in the R- I-A zoning district. 2. That the home on Lot 13 was constructed around 1930 with a 1.3 foot side yard setback. 3. That the owner of Lot 13 in 1930 did not own Lot 14. 4. That Lot 14 is unbuildable without the variance. 5. That the previous common ownership and the 1.3 distance of feet from the north property line are attributes that are unique to Lot 13. BASED ON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, hereby determines that the literal enforcement of the eight foot side yard setback would cause an undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the subject property, that the granting of the requested variance to the extent necessary to compensate for such hardship is in keeping with the intent of the Hopkins City Code, that the construction of a new home is a reasonable use of Lot 14 and that granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the area in which it is located. Therefore, application for Variance VN06-1 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing garage on Lot 13 is moved to the existing setback requirements. 2. A building permit for a house on Lot 14 will not be issued until the garage on Lot 13 is moved. 3. The new house constructed on Lot 14 will have a 15-foot sideyard setback on the south side. All other setbacks will comply with the existing setbacks for the R -1- A zoning district. 4. The existing garage on Lot 14 will not be converted to a home. 5. The principal use of Lot 14 will not be used for storage. 6. That if a fence is constructed on Lot 14 it must be setback four feet from the south property line. 7. That the above conditions be incorporated in a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants to be recorded against the title of Lots 13 and 14. That cost associated the preparation and recording the Declaration will be paid by the applicant. Adopted this 5th day of September 2006. Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk ~ I r\-r L.VI ~ 11.1 ~ ~ ..J N88-18'40uE <( ~ W 0 CD (J) a::: ::> ~ u 0 0 ~ 0 0 c::i ci I r"'Ior to 1..1.1 I ~ 0 ~ W I- W ex: u ~ z 0 () ~ ~ W ;r .q- CONCRETE i-0 0 0 0 0 0 ci z If) I 1"\ or 1..1.1 I - - - - - - - - 38.4 - - - - - - - - W I- 12.5 W a::: () z 0 () I r\-r L.V I .,::; I....' 16.7 17.0 11,7 123.09 4.64'~ , ,...; 5.1 ., A , "r --------- " ~ :. ~. . '. o. . _ .' .:. " . 0.. . ~. '.' :. ,.j." '.: ",' ;of . . "~ '0 .n .: ~,:, o. '. Cl., '0 " "":" . to }0- W ..J ..J <( I 13.2 I .. .... ..: ."" ":"-.: ". g I ;UfG:" ~OR': "ci 0.1' N. OF ' . 0 12.7 PROP. LINE"' ..- I ........ w ;;) <.0 ..- o o (f) o o ci to W I- W ex: () z o () BITUMINOUS 12.2 I 12.0 1~.1 I ~/////////////////d ~ HOUSE ~ . 123.68 .,? 14 . . SURVEY FOR: PATRICK HANLON PROPERTY ADDRESS: 109 11th Avenue North, Hopkins, Minnesota. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 13 & 14, Block 78, WEST MINNEAPOLIS 2ND DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. by: N W E S 0 20 40 ~ I SCALE IN FEET CERTIFICA TION: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of 011 buildings. if any, thereon, and 011 visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated: July 25, 2006 Anderson Engineering of Minnesota. LLC . DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT A TION o DENOTES SET IRON PIPE MARKED WITH R.L.S. NO. 20281 NOTES: 1. The bearing system is based on west line of Lots 13 and 14 which is assumed to have a bearing of North 00 degrees 03 minutes 44 seconds East. 2. The area of the property described hereon is 12,333 square feet or 0.2831 acres. Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING 11 540 13605 1ST AVENUE NORTH, PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 TEL (763) 412-4000 FAX (763) 383-1089 X:\11500\11540 HANLON LOT SURVEY\11540S-l.dwg, 7/26/20062:53:04 PM, \\server5\HP 5000 Survey, 1:20