Preliminary/Final Plat 1 y
0
O .c
July 20, 1993 yo P �5 Report SUBD93 -2
Planning
K
PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT SONOMA ADDITION
Proposed Action.
Staff- recommends the following motion: Move to approve
Resolution RZ93 -17 recommending approval of
preliminaryjfinal plat for Sonoma Addition. the
Overview.
In 1992 a cond use permit was granted for the
construction of a 24 unit handicapped housing project on the
northwest corner of County Road 3 and 5th Avenue. One
conditions of the conditional use permit was that the site
be re- platted. The applicant is now requesting the re-
platting of this property. The purpose of the re- platting
is as follows:
o to combine the various single family lots that
exist into one single site.
o the Hopk HRA w own a port of the property
and be constructing a parking lot.
Primary; Issues to Consider:
o What are the specifics of the plat?
o Do the proposed lots meet the minimum lot
requirements?
o What is the action being requested?
Supporting Documents.
o Analysis of Issues
O Final Plat
o Resolution RZ93 -17
1 l IiL, a I ilIA
N
anc
S
And
erso
n
AICP
Plan er
410
SUBD93 -2
Page 2
Primary Issues to consider.
o What are the specifics of the plat?
The plat details the specifics of how the lots will be
divided and the location of the required easements. The
proposed plat will consist of two lots, an outlot and Lot 1.
Lot 1 will also have drainage and utility easements. The
City Engineer is requesting that there is a street easement
on 5th Avenue. This street easement will provide additional
right -of -way if 5th Avenue is upgraded in the future. The
City Engineer is also requesting a drainage and utility
easement along the entire west property line of Block 1.
o Do the proposed lots meet the minimum lot requirements?
The parking lot for Dow Towers will be an outlot because it
does not meet the minimum requirements for an R -5 district.
The Zoning Ordinance defines an outlot as the following: a
parcel of land, included in a plat, which is smaller than
the minimum size permitted for lots and which is thereby
declared unbuildable until combined through platting with
additional land; or a parcel of land which is included in a
plat and which is at least double the minimum size and which
is thereby subject to future platting prior to development;
or a parcel of land which is included in a plat and which is
designated for public or private open space, right -of -way,
utilities or other similar purposes. An outlot is deemed to
be unbuildable. No structure will be able to be constructed
on the outlot, unless in the future it is re- platted.
The site where the handicapped housing development is being
constructed meets the minimum lot requirements for the R -5
zoning district.
o What is the action being requested?
The applicant is requesting approval of both a preliminary
and final plat. The Ordinance allows both a preliminary and
final plats to be approved a the same time.
Alternatives.
1. By recommending approval of the preliminary /final plat,
the City Council will consider a recommendation of
approval for the plat.
1111
SUBD93 -2
Page 3
2. By recommending denial of the preliminary /final plat,
the City Council will consider a recommendation of
denial for the plat.
3. Continue for further information. If the Commission
indicates that further information is needed the item
should be continued.
1111
1111
NO, TH Locati jbn M j I (69 9
19(60) (42)1 M r r` 19(41) (21) t 1 1 a 0 14 (52)
77 18 ro 18(40 (22) 2 2 (12) (70)10 0
M M 2
17(58) (44) MO N 17(39 (23) 3 rn0 M 3 (5) (89) (88) 57 (51) (53
111 (45) 4• cw N. 16 (38) (24) 4 cx� 41 1 /3 3C
(46) 5 ti N 15 (37) (25) 5 N 5
t (13) M
ST.
16 (57). 14(36 (26) 6 m h 61 (17) (15) a' -lea 3/0
15(56) (167) r (34 N 9 8 7 6
4ii (27} 7 7 (6) (87) (86) (85) (84)
14.(55) (48)6 (28) 8 1 z r (3)
13 81(19) (16) O
i
9 8 -(4) (33 31) 29) 9 (1660 (8) 1 (110) (92) i
l
co 1 (5 10 0 (4i9 12 10 169) 4 5 (9) f 2 Q i 13 14
i R 621 525 517 t 50/ 499 4
(53) (170) r,
1 1 1 A _4.3_A 4201; 3/4 1
4/4 404
^O 1 I X 141 42Q A gip
5 6 I 21 314'S16 i I I 11 12 13 14 I
(5 156) (5 1 (312) t L 163Nkt (3) 1 (52)11 (6) (7) 1 15
(59) 7 (58) 42
7 I (4) F
L
4 r `q 30 1 1 t f _(9)
(60) �,E� B s... 29 (27) 2 1 (8)
h 44(93). (6I) 9 m• 40 9 (9) I 1
o 28(26) 3
(62)10 ti 39(50 10_ N
SJr 27(25 4 0.) 1 (32) (43)
t. I 11` _38 (33)11 N (51)
SUBJECT 5
40 (1 r 12 37(49 12 1 PROPPER Y (10)6 N
`�f 13 36 (34)13 h
39 br 14 14 2 24(23 (II) 7
i M 23( (12) 8 p (37) (38)
0 38 15 (35) 15 e. 3 (34) 6 7
37 I r (36)16 5
411
1 r -1 .6 i 21(20.
36 1 i 32(45) (37)17 h 0� (35)
1 21
(147 d (1 a 4 4
35 18 rrnr� 3 (38) SUBJECT a'
S 1(44 PROPERTY 69 3
-33" (73)20 t 19)\ 1� ��5 0-
32 I 1 r 1 �e\31� 6, (23)
r:a N2� S� l
N� F 1
.,A\G NEO S
P`O 'I (25) (24)
(139) OR�)
N Q
G -c° PGA IP.
GN
1
z
°c, I
\ag i
o I
09 p4� m S 00 °14'45" W I
di `J 00 °14' 45" E 236.97
1 �Ul VI N O.
172.37 I- 1 I 65.00
I I 5 J
\yam 1 I t0
0 p
I Z
o a i c uN r0
�1 \C�\ O O N
i\ O D N I V 1
VI 7
(D o \209.75 Ito -iB
.x ..20.. 1 65.00 o-
s Z� S
6 2.. 273.75 f
k' 3 00 °04' 14" W
f
O rn rn F
Z rn rn
I'
CIO
0
x7 Y IIII
N O
0
I IIIII W
CD
D m
X N
o Z a 1
Z Z I4
N j
C Z O
C O
m F
C) m
-I �1
CO C.1
I
N O
l
F
1
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO: RZ93 -17
RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY /FINAL PLAT
FOR NHHI BARRIER FREE HOUSING
WHEREAS, an application for a subdivision SUBD93 -2, made by The
National Handicap Housing Institute to replat the northwest corner of
County Road 3 and Fifth Avenue is recommended for approval.
WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows:
1. That an application for a subdivision SUBD93 -2 was filed
with the City of Hopkins on July 6, 1993.
2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published
and mailed notices, held a public hearing on the application
and reviewed such application on July 27, 1993: all persons
present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be
heard.
3. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff and
the Planning Commission were considered.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for
subdivision SUBD 93 -2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the
following Findings of Fact:
1. That the Sonoma Addition Plan meets the subdivision
requirements.
2. That the Sonoma Addition meets the minimum lot
requirements for the R -5 zoning district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for SUBD 93 -2 is hereby
recommended for approval based on the following conditions:
1. That the property owned by the Hopkins HRA is an outlot.
2. That the easement along Fifth Avenue is a street, drainage
and utility easement.
3. That there is a 5 foot drainage and utility easement along
the entire west property line of block 1.
Adopted this 27th day of July, 1993.
1111 ohn T. Hutchison, Chairman