Loading...
Communications Tower• • • Proposed Action. Overview. Issues to Consider. Supporting Documents. o Background o Location Map o Tower Specifications Nancy fl-fl Anderson Community Development Analyst 0 February 16, 1988 Planning Commission Report: CUP88 -3 CITY OF HOPKINS Communications Tower Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: The request by the City of Hopkins for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 120 foot communications tower is approved. The City of Hopkins is upgrading its' communications system. The new system involves primary transmitting and receiving equipment located at various existing structures throughout the City and a back -up antenna at City Hall. For an effective system the back -up antenna needs to be 120 feet high. This tower will be used by all City departments. Without a Conditional Use Permit the tower could be 105 feet high. o Is the tower necessary for the safety and welfare of the citizens? o What is the impact on surrounding properties of a 120 foot tower? • • CUP88 -3 Page 2 DETAILED BACKGROUND. Name of Applicant: City of Hopkins Address of Property: 1010 First Street South Present Zoning: B -2 Reason for Request: Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for heights over the maximum allowed Nature of Request: To erect a 120 foot tower The proposed communications system involves having several primary remote sites throughout the City. Existing sites such as the Hopkins House and Hopkins Village Apartments will be some of the primary sites. The primary sites do not have a back -up power system, so if there is a power failure or if they are hit by lightning a back -up system is needed. City Hall was chosen for a back -up site because of the availability of a back -up generator and to eliminate reliance on leased telephone circuits. The Communications Engineer working on this project has indicated that the proposed tower will have to be 120 feet in height to be effective. 1111 The Police Department is proposing to locate the tower just north of the police garage on the east side of the building. This location will provide a secure location because the tower would be surrounded by the City Hall on two sides. A fence will be built on the other two sides for security. At this time the Police Department has not decided what type of fence will be built. It has been recommended that the tower be free standing. A guyed tower would not be aesthetically pleasing and requires a loss of several parking spaces. The existing communications equipment on the City Hall boiler stack will be removed. This tower will provide the City with flexibility to add additional systems for the City as well as some other functions for the County, like Civil Defense. This tower will be the best for a long term communications system. City Hall is surrounded by the Auto Mall to the south, the Post Office to the east, apartments to the west and Norwest Bank to the north. • • • CUP88 -3 Page 3 ANALYSIS. The proposed tower will be put on the City Hall site for the welfare and safety of all the citizens of Hopkins. Unfortunately no tower of this type is aesthetically pleasing. The placement of the tower will minimize the impact of the City Hall site as well as the surrounding residential area. The residential neighborhood to the west and the new townhomes on First Street will be approximately 95 feet. The tower will take only the parking space which was used by the utility trailer for the barricades. This type of tower will provide the City a flexible system for the future. Additions can be made from future expansion of the communications systems in Hopkins. Edina recently built a communication tower. This tower is a single pole, which may be more aesthetically pleasing, but the tower is not flexible for adding or deleting equipment. ALTERNATIVES. 1. Approve the communication tower. This alternative will provide the City with the most flexible and effective standby and coordination communications. 2. Deny the communication tower. This alternative will jeopardize the safety and welfare of the citizens. 3. Approve a single pole tower. This alternative will provide an adequate system, but the system can never be changed. 4. Continue for further information. If the Commission feels that more information is needed or there might be a better site, then this item should be continued. • • • CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 88 - RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CUP88 -3 WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit entitled CUP88 - has been made to allow a 120 foot high communications tower at the Hopkins City Hall, 1010 First Street South. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Conditional Use Permit CUP88 - was filed with the City of Hopkins on January 28, 1988. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission reviewed such application on February 24, 1988. 3. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on February 24, 1988; all persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. That the written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hopkins City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to Conditional Use Permit CUP88 -3: (1) That the communications tower is needed for the safety and welfare of the residents. That the proposed tower will provide the needed standby and coordination radio equipment to serve the citizens of Hopkins. Adopted this 1st day of March, 1988. Donald Milbert, Mayor • Conditional Use Permit Application R. Reason for request: The City of Hopkins has undertaken a radio communications en- hancement oroject which will affect virtually all City departments which use either police, fire or local government radio communica- tion. Primary transmitting and receiving equipment for the system will be located remotely, at a number of locations in and near the City of Hopkins. In all cases, antennas at the remote sites will be installed on existing structures, eliminating individual site tower construction. In order to maintain communications continuity in the event of disruption of primary sites, either due to weather conditions, commercial power outages, and /or telephone network interruptions, it is necessary to maintain a standby communications site for maintenance of critical communications at all times. In the case of Hopkins, it is desired to locate the standby equipment, as well as coordination equipment, at the City Hall to eliminate reliance on leased telephone circuits for control of equipment and to ensure the availability of electrical power through the use of the emergency generator which is installed at City Hall. In order for the standby and coordination radio equipment to be effective, it will be necessary to place antennas at higher elevations than the building structure would allow. The radio communications engineer who has been retained for this project has indicated that this need would be best satisfied through the construction of a radio tower of 120 feet in height. The use of a guyed tower in this application is not recommended due to aesthetic and parking space impact. A freestanding tower of this height would require spacing of the three legs at the base of 14 feet, 7 1/8 inches. Each leg would, of course, be attached to a concrete pad. The tower would taper, with the spacing between legs at the top narrowing to two feet, six inches. The EIA standard for radio towers in this geographical area of the country requires the ability of the tower to withstand a sustained 80- mile - per -hour wind with one -half inch of ice on the tower surface. This standard is what dictates the size and spacing of the tower base. City staff analysis of the proposed tower has resulted in a suggested placement in the east City Hall parking lot adjacent to the commercial power transformer near the police department entrance. It is believed that this location will offer the highest degree of security, as well as the least aesthetic impact to the area. It should be noted that construction of this tower will allow for removal of the unsightly set of antennas presently installed on the City Hall boiler stack. It will also be necessary to protect the tower from trespassers through the use of a fence as well as some posts to prevent contact from vehicular traffic. This site will also minimize impact on parking space, with a net loss of approximately one and one -half spaces. This space is normally occupied by a utility trailer which is used seasonally by the police department for barricade placement and stored at the municipal garage the majority of the time. I . - .;F5) •i ST() FPGE it gbLIJI • 1 TP- A. 'yr fxM Loaa1 T} NING YcbM Z L�'t'T;VE=S �Srr tte-DEANTS ftecErna■ ,GCNTfz) YET' E eautr. F Of 7NT-1 ,. I f.TTEFoG • 3ULl�`1 (ro EIN MI`G� Stole . D ile Name: DWG101 K 14'7 7/8" _ +120' — +100' _ +60' — +40' - +20' 920' AMSL REV. DATE CHANGE FILE NAME: ANTENNA MOUNTING LEG A C B A C B D A E C F B G C H A ANTENNA MOUNTING CONSULTING ENGINEER LEONARD J.KOEHNEN ASSOC. INC. POST OFFICE BOX 851103 RICHARDSON,TX 75085 214/680 -9033 CITY OF HOPKINS MINNESOTA PROJECT LEONARD J.KOEHNEN,PE MOUNT HT USE 120 FT PD RPTR STAND BY 100 FT FD CHAN /MUT AID STBY 100 FT PW RPTR STAND BY 78 FT HENN F3 EMCCY 70 FT MONITOR RECEIVERS S0 FT POINT TO POINT 45 FT HENN INTERSYST 60 FT METRO EMCCY NOTE: THE TOWER HAS 3 LEGS. THE LEFT LEG SHOWN IS NOTED AS LEG A THE RIGHT LEG SHOWN IS LEG B. THE HIDDEN LEG IS LEG C. ALL ANTENNAS ARE SHOWN FOR CLARITY ON LEGS A AND B. THE TABLE ABOVE SHOWS THE CORRECT MOUNTING LOCATIONS. PRELIMINARY SIZE AND ANTENNA PLACEMENT OF PROPOSED CITY HALL RADIO TOWER. SCALE NONE DATE 2 -9 -88 DRAWING NO. 87332 -101 TOWER SCHEDULE SECTION JSPREAD NO. DMENSION TOWER LEGS 60651 YELD STN, TOWER BRACES FLANGF TOP P1 ATFS I BOTTOM FLANGE BOLTS BRACE BOLTS NONE UPPER LOWER aax13K51 T2LD 3411. 1 W I-2 1 -2 9 , 6 - 0 SOLID 3; $ SOLID 3,A,3,::/- 3 44 2 3 X4d ,2_46 )(iv 2 W 1 -2 1 3, A SOLID 5 0 SOLID 6 3 22IX 3yex4' L 3 2'21,3, RC X 36 ' 12 -p X1:2 NONE 3 WN 1-6 1 -10 .V0 SOLID M 0 SOLID 1 /1, SOLID 3 x 3 X4q 1`1".`62 4 x a),(:414.11,;5:-''2 5v1 a 41',2,(4,,, V 42 `412 X IZ 5 4,6%)(C44' 5 X 5 X44 14,6'6 C 5 4V0X,W 5 x R 41 5 8 ) C t 6 •3432 f 7 T %.46 6 4. 7 7 %7.. XI 4. - 8" 4 X 4 XY 31: BC x56 6C 412X4V2X58 5 45+ ,, C ` 5 �C 5 X4�' 44W.,,,, 5 5 5 X47' 4 5 4 X 5 Bi•f 6 3'4 6 )2 7r6XC 7 2YK. ? Ptl;k ,,,:!,',‘c4 C4''2-/6 7 7 X /4 7 B X) C - 12 --2 X2 I2 -3 x % e 2. Q - 12- 0Iz t2 - 36 X2 12- x2%2 1 2- 36X2'/2 23, X2 i 2- 74 e X3V x3 1 2- 7, 6 237 ' NONE 3 72 - /eX V 7Z - 75- 1 ,2x1 1 !' 75 - % /2X1 60 2 45- 1, 2x1 ' /4 45-y X1' z 4 45- XI'/a 30 -33X17 30- 38X1'7 414 i - lo 2 - 2 1741, 0 SOLID 5N 2-2 2 !TWO SOLID 3 0SOLID L 1 x 1'4 x 1,e L 14 x I4 x 1 1, 8 L 1 1 4 x l,4 0; L I 134x'4 L 2 x 2x1 /6 L 2 x 2 X3, L 3 x 3 x ',6 L 3 x 3 x 3' 6 N 2 4 2 0 PIPE 7 N 4-61 43-6; 2 - 0 PIPE 8 N - 6-63; 6-61 2 1, 2 d PIPE 9 N 6 i0—el, 2'r O PIPE ION 10-6 1 t2 -7. 1 246 PIPE 11 N 12 -7 14 -73 3 0 PIPE 12N 14-7 16-83 3ij PIPE 13 N 16 -83 18-6 4 •0 PIPE 1414 16 • 20 - 93 8 4• d PIPE 13'4 X3'4 x'4; L 4 6 4 x ' L 4 x 4 x 1/4' J FLANGE 1,E 77 % 975%1a,XI+ 12 -1 X4'■ 912X92 5 9;2 S'29C 3942X1{' 4 ;2- 1 X.4'',4 va e C 9 2 X9,2X ',,"'g'' 7 824. 1-: 5,� s',t9C 1W 2 1 X4'4 OF THAT SECTION IS OFFSET. 54 -30 S4 - %X1'4 54 '1X1 15 N 20 -9 22 -03 5 PIPE 16N 22 24 5 ' t PIPE * ASTERISK INDICATES THAT THE BOTTOM A 1 Z 1 y 0 1 Z h 5 • k C a N Z V Q M-- 1441 M- /.71 N5 4 -- 615 +- • 3 -8411 -- --.• .3 .1 17 _ • 21 -05 3 - ftt 5 _ 5 • "85 ,' -85 , —.5 M -145 2, 316 1 14 2 66 3 - 146 • 1 .6 3 N7 1 N7 2 M7 3 -N7 4 -N7 5 Ne 1 - N 2 - N e 3 - 146 A 14 9 1 69 2 - 149 3 - N10 3 -1411 2 - NIL 3 -N12 1 - 1412 2 - 1113 1 - •13 2 - N14 1A 1414 1• - 1414 24 - 1114 26 — 1115 IA 1 1 ; AT MERNIEOIATE CLPS USE TOP l a SE C'S 611129 ITYPIOLI FOR SECS sN -/Sro I - 1113 2A - 1415 26 - N16 10 - 4416 2A - 1116 26 320 TOWER ELEVATION BRACING DETAILS Pole SECTIONS 4N & 5N ' AT EYO CLIPS. USE 11014. I NEAREST FLANGE PLATE BRACING DETAIL FOR SECTIONS 6N -I3N AT WTERMEDURE CUPS, 1, TOPE 6007014 HOLES �4 i Z\ OUTSTANDING LEGS Cr ANGLES ARE IPM SPLICE CONNECTION AT 060 CL663. use HOLE NEAREST FLANGE PLATE BRAONG DETAIL FOR SECTIONS 14N -16N SEC NO LEGS BRACES TOTAL IW 2W 3 WN 4N 51 6N 71 6N 9N I0N II N 12 N 13N 1414 1514 18 N WEIGHTS 260 345 290 300 426 420 430 570 690 790 845 1,155 1,155 175 1 95 190 245 274 300 400 840 825 910 1,625 2, 000 2,15 0 116 160 230 435 540 480 545 700 720 830 1410 1515 1,700 2,470 3,155 3,305 GENERAL NOTES: 1 , . - 4f •7 w /.!%!CC /JLGYOffAU w /!'v. %! //L J : ^.'moo.•. Jf! /N 4S, J7w4 2. ALL PART NO METAL SWPED WOE 0A4W114L6' 3 PAL NUTS P80Y10E0 FOR ALL LOWER 6017$ 4. STEP 60135 PRCY® ON ONE LEG FOR SECTIONS 4N TRRU 1111, ANO STEP 60173 ON 3 LEGS FOR SECTIONS UN 71RU 16N. S ALL 'TOWER YORRERi AAE 143T -0PP1D 64L66NRE0 AFTER /A9RICATION 6. TEE OWC.0- 800300 1011 10N+d1T10N OETAAS R4 Jf! / '.•w - wA1/ CMss: A•/'J. fv J...f • r i• .r 4 wz» ul,'i.a. cN•..uP 14« -AN.•F 14 010C1. WWI / WTI F! /ACf .0:'3 /MJ /C. 'nr/.re 21r/a. 62 SECT. 3WN WAS 3W RI;SECTION5 4W 61W RERL 61 •6 6511 ■ MODEL SSV TOWER STANDARD SERIES 4/ 4424 .z.4 K- 10.73' //2 t/J/1l 0/J 7 /6/71 6601 54547 6W I « . IR, FOUNDATION DATA WWu � W Z dN MAX. ALE MAX. ALI.0M,B•E ANCHOR BOLT DATA PIER 8 PAD PAD DRILL 8 BELL LEG i LO D t i e LM.-n Di M ME VOSS SIZE BOLT DIRE PROJ D X Y -BARS •,,, ECKEL ,,. NCO l CU VMS D X Y V -BARS a C- CU YD M N R N -BARS RouNO FCRR souARE ME 1W I' -z' f - off o' -e>� 1r -�-TIB 2� 2# 3'-O' La 2W I' - 6' I' - 3, - 0' -f01}- 12 - 118 2fi 2+ 4' - 0' 2. 3WN 1' -10 f - 74 1 -01 12 -3x24 31- 3 5' -0 3.8 4N 2' -2' 1' -107 1 -3" 12 -e 030 4* 3i 6=61 6. 511 2 - 6 2 - 2 1 -5 12 -x30 4+ 34 7= -6 8.5 61 4 -`6- S-11" 2'-7-,1 I2 -'•30 4 33- 9'0 12.Z 7N 25,300 2,000 6' -6'} 8'- 6 R ' 5- 8a 7'- 5" 3-91 4 12-1(30 41 41 31 31 6' -" 8' -0 4'-G' 5 -6 I' - 6' 2 -0 69 G 89' 7 96 9 6 5.0 8.4 5_3 9.1 10 -0 15.0 13 16" 27.3 8 -6' 9' -6 4-O 5 - O . 2'O" 2' - 0 - 69 8 89 7 4. 5 6.5 8 11 39,400 5,000 9N 32,700 5,500 10 -6 I 9 -1 6L 1 12 -F30 4 34 8 -0 ' 5 = 2 - 0 . 897 M6 8.4 9.1 14 -0 23. 9' -O 5-0" 20' 897 6,3 ION 32,700 5,500 12 -7 +" Id -II" 2 - -314 I2 -i(36 5 4 8' - 0' 5 -6" 2-0' 897 96 8.4 9.1 17 -0 43.2 4-0' 5' 2' 897 G.3 1 1 N 48,700 4,500 14 -74 12! 8,} 8- 5 1 }' 12 -1x42 7 17 5 9' -3' 5 -6' 2-0' 897 9 6 8.9 9_ 6 10' 5 2 - 0' 891 6,8 1214 47,700 4,500 16 - 14-53- 9' -7 " 12 -3-x42 7 5 2-3' 5'-6' 2-0" 897 96 8.3 9-6 10-6 6'-0' 2 -0' 897 6.8 1314 62,200 6,000 18'- 81I-' 16'- 2 b" 10-9 124x42 7T 5 9L3' 6' -o' 2-0 ' 8 89 8 9 6 10.1 10.8 I I' - c,'" 6' -0' 2-6" 109 8 11.0 I4N 62,200 5000 20' -93' 17' -11 12 -0" 12- 1x48 91 54 8 6 -0" 2 -0' 898 96 10.1 10.8 11' -0 6' -0' 2 -0" 1098 11.0 I5 N 97,000 10,000 22 - 9' 5- 8 7 L- IK II" 12 - 1848 94 54 11b 5 -0' 2-6' 1298 96 12.6 14.0 13'-0" 6' -0 2 -6 1298 12.1 161' 97000 ' 0000 24 -98" 2I'- 5, 14- 3}e 12- 1 x48 9-i 53- 11L0' 6 - 0" 2 - 6' 129 8 9 6 12.6 le - 13'0 6' -0 2-6" 129 8 12.1 ILES LOAO ANO SMEAR VALUES ARE FOR ONE LEG. ♦CONCRETE • QUANTITIES SHORN 45E 103 THREE MESS. 2_401, FOR EO'6JNOLT TOLERANCES SEE DWG A 6.0214 C ■ /•\ -T t 3 • Ai C / 1 v OF 114E 140 \\ / rt 9 7 10 TOWER 6x0 / -'!- I L Y , W _y-- "E6R � 30. 886411E r _ I' - =d 1 - �=TT��TTFT�'1 1 11 11 11 111 1 1 0111111; LL11 L LLL;✓ 0 V -BARS 1EOUALL 34680) #3 SPIRAL or PITCH) TIES OR 4 '3 LATERAL TIES ( ON 12 COTTERS) V-8AR5 1153U•LLT 346000 ' a- 0 3 SPIRAL TIES - 1{ U ldj,TT� II 1 1 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 11 III D - - Tf ^ "�^ 9 3 7T I 1 SECTIONS IOU 19 / ' LATERAL 7163 �I (RM t4' CCNTINS) 4-0' ' �TTTTI 1 11 ii 11 II 111_L --T�� 04 14-1541t3 (.12-0.F-) 11 -BARS = _ --1 ECO SECTIONS NH TYCV'ION . \ / C !• \ I _1 EIZ -O.[.) 13 -- t , 1 + 9iM -OARS (Ix- Ot]: /. l l (�f - cr An / __ -ma X J maw. I- �♦ -" ^/� i PIER 8 PAD PAD DRILL 8 DELL 13' , - N � T ` GENERAL NOTES s 1 GRACE OJP 4110431 .OLT -� FLAMOE PLATE - _ / l ' I �0' 111 All 4045 SO 04 TS SMALL SE TIGHTENED TO - SMUG w / / ' / TK1T � 4 - . \ / no.. t5 OEfw E6 1,5 THE full ((7031 OF • Null ,/\ MSR1f 611 O43:NART SMW wnENCM TOWER ILO ., � aMGMOR MlT Ml NUTS MJST GE *5161,1(0 ON ALL *118(404 !0173. 1 (9 8010(7(. 3.000 PS tam!. ULTIMATE STRENGTH AT 2a 0413 .. 121 4 04407 40 DEIOMNE0 REB4/15. MI *TIN 6- 041411101E MIMEO AT (9 FOLwOcIT0N DEMON USED ON THE FOLLOWING. il - � us(oFU1E0 of S GE fNRY loll NOTE " - T - NOTF 11000 PEE sal FOR PIER • MO ° 14ETE oajrtw TOWER S[CTSONS I rMrC4 xcTlw�C b. 4000 PIE SOIL FOR SECTIONS TN -1611 ORM .. GELL Ti SE �( 'MAW 6 P PILL HUT 4 REY. B*ts' CONCRETE 5ONCRETE ;- *36 I R R / i 1 1 W ALL WIT K RAMOVEO FROM CONCRETE \ 000W11E E PIL 414016 801 E ssouw CONCRETE COvIX OE 411. RaO4RS1,3 3: 040.0 e01TS /arm 0'3 E TOTTER 4X0 GM ALL 10 05 036117 \ W ES li M > 11 . 9ATwat 01140 Po 40 R E. Now,. . A. MORN - Saw / 1.ow FOR DRAINAGE f DOTING 8 DRAINAGE pETAILS N \ - \ 77� �s �r0 la: .. . c9,-* R 0 3 VET FON DATA /010 RAT. TES •NOTET II0 11 -73 7J 11 Al NF .fi /00:0 / /Of H 04014 .400,0 3 AILMOI4. of 5 ra * /17 /MA 1 0Mf 7 J G/3 1 4 RJ REems COVEJU,E REWSFP QA 1•L GWF, / S \ R( f ! / \ N SECT. 3W 'WS 3W L6/71f 4* *13/71 R 115ECS. 40 • 3 W ERL.*T *3 R ON Ufl.FCOFlOIM 7 " "' ALTERNATE FOUNDATIONS F04 MODEL SSV TOWERS N SERIES FOUNDATION LAYOUT _ _ BOIT ORIENTATIONS ANCHOR '8041.0402' 23 10. = T - "- -' - -� - ` ' %PIE _ y J '- L ; ..- - _.. - . x - 700300 11 , /,7:n -�- o..-_.. v i � i R / : 1