Loading...
Cond. Use Permit-Conv. Store/Car WashPlanning Commission Report - CONDITIONAL USE - CONVENIENCE STORE /CAR WASH 7TH STREET SOUTH & 11TH AVENUE PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT NO: CUP87 -4 No. CUP87 - 4 MARCH 24, 1987 PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on an application for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a convenience store /car wash. BACKGROUND: Name of Applicant: Jack Welch Address of Property: Southwest corner of 7th Street and 11th Avenue South. Present Zoning: B -3 Reason for Request: Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for a motor fuel station and construction over $75,000. Purpose of Request: To construct a convenience store and car wash. The subject property received a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 10,368 square foot, 10 bay self - service car wash on December 3, 1985. This Conditional Use Permit was granted an extension for one year in December 1986 by the City Council. The applicant and the owner are now proposing to revise the original proposal by adding a convenience store on the subject site. A subdivision has also been applied for. The new proposed site plan shows 3094 square feet in store area, approximately 1038 square feet for storage and a four stall, 2376 square foot car wash. The convenience store will also have two pump islands for the dispensing of gas. The following is a listing of how the proposed project meets the minimum requirements for the district: • CUP87 -4 Page 2 PROPOSED PLAN B -3 CAR WASH CONVENIENCE STORE Lot Area 3,000 approx 11,739 approx 27,308 Lot Width 25 66'75" 153' F.A.R. 1.5, .22 .18 Front Yard 1 45' 64' Mtr Fuel St FY 10 n/a 10' Side Yard -East 0 0 98' West 0 18' 0 Rear Yard 15 70' 15' Bldg.Height 45 approx 16' approx 16' Parking Conv.St. 20 n/a 17 Parking Car Wash 0 4 n/a Car Wash Stacking 12 12 n/a Motor Fuel Stations also have additional requirements. 535.03 Subd. 2(m) states the following: 1. the site shall be constructed for drainage according to a plan submitted and approved by the city engineer and fire marshal; 2. the entire site not covered with building or landscaping shall be hard surfaced; 3. the lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source visible from the public right -of -way or adjacent land in the R district; 4. no driveway access is less than 40 feet from a street intersection; 5. any other businesses operated on the site shall conform to this code; 6. the site shall be constructed for parking and traffic according to a plan submitted and approved; 7. if the station is a self - service each pump island shall accommodate six vehicles in storage lane in addition to those accommodated at island; 8. the front yard shall be landscaped and ten feet in depth, if station is non - conforming a curb shall be constructed to separate the drive from public walk. The proposed plans meet all of these requirements. The subject site is surrounded by a shopping area to the south, an empty lot to the west, Westbrooke to the east and an industrial area to the north. • CUP87 -4 Page 3 This site will probably create more traffic than currently on 11th Avenue. The residents most affected will be the Westbrooke area south and east of the site. The applicant has been in contact with the Westbrooke groups. The Director of Engineering has reviewed the ingress /egress points and found them acceptable. The drainage for the site was also acceptable. Access to the convenience store will be from 11th Avenue and 7th Street. The proposed plan shows two ingress /egress points on 11th Avenue and one on 7th Street. The intersection of 7th & 11th has a four -way stop. The car wash and convenience store will have a common drive - through area near the exit of the car wash for shared parking. The landscaping requirement for Parcel B is 13 trees and 10 trees for Parcel A. The applicant does show various plantings on the site plan which meet the landscape requirements. The high row of evergreens in the rear of the site will provide screening to the abutting lot. The landscaping along 11th Avenue will have a base of rock. The delivery area for the proposed store is on the south side of the site. This area should not interfere with the normal traffic flow. The trash container will be located next to the storage /delivery area at the southern side of the site. The container will be enclosed in the storage /delivery area. There will be two 40' pump islands located on the site. The applicant at the time of the report did not know how many pumps would be on the site. The pumps will be covered with a canopy. Specific plans detailing the number of pumps will have to be presented prior to issuing a building permit. There is no requirement for number of pumps. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and is concerned with the parking visibility at the pumps. During the writing of the reports the Fire Marshal was out of town. Any approval should be contingent on his approval. I will be in contact with him before the meeting for his recommendation. Drainage will flow in an easterly direction. CUP87 -4 Page 4 The applicant is proposing a new five foot sidewalk along 11th Avenue. The site plan shows a pylon sign on the corner and a low sign along 11th Avenue. Any signage will require a sign permit and have to meet the requirements for the district. The exterior of the buildings will be brick. ANALYSIS: The applicant has worked with the staff a great deal to arrive at the site plan that is before you. The only problem we see is the convenience store does not have the required parking. The convenience store is required to have 20 parking spaces, which the applicant could have if there was a parking area along 7th Street. Because a 10 foot setback is required for motor fuel stations, parking is not allowed in this area. We have talked to the applicant about having a permanent agreement for parking at the car wash site, which he will agree to. There is no parking requirement for the car wash, so with the ability to utilize 4 spaces on the car wash site, the convenience store will have the required parking. The pump area is not counted for parking, but in reality a person will probably get gas, leave their car at the pump and go in the store. Although the staff feels this arrangement is acceptable, if the Commission feels that an agreement for parking at the car wash will cause problems, the only other solution would be to either require a variance on the number of stalls or consider a variance to park in the front yard setback. The applicant feels that the parking on the site is more than adequate, most of their other sites have less parking than we are requiring. The staff looked at a similar facility in Rogers, MN that had less parking than proposed and that seemed to function adequately. Another possibility for the applicant to have the required parking spaces would be to not allow the subdivision of the property. The car wash parking spaces would then be included into the overall sites parking. Such an approach does not appear logical. This option is not practical because the car wash parking area then would be considered the front yard of the motor fuel station. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the Conditional Use Permit for both sites with the condition that permanent parking agreements be obtained for both parcels. 2. Approve the Conditional Use Permit without any parking agreements. The Commission will then have to approve a parking variance. • CUP87 -4 Page 5 fl 3. Deny the Conditional Use Permit on the basis that the convenience store site does not have the required parking. 4. Approve the Conditional Use Permit, but deny the subdivision. 5. Continue the application for a month to obtain more information. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend Alternative #1. The following are recommended Findings of Fact and Conditions should the Commission recommend approval: 1. The proposed plan meets the requirements for a motor fuel station. 2. The proposed plan meets the requirements for a car wash. Conditions: 1. The permanent parking agreements are obtained, recorded and a copy supplied to the City. 2. That the Fire Marshal approve the proposed site plan. Respectfully submitted, JOind-QADrnr\ Nancy (5. Anderson Community Development Analyst /414 (NORTH (67) • (SOUTH 1 1IJ 1 ( 71) (34) (73)(36) (74)(37) (75)(38) ( 76) (39) ( 771 78)(41) 111 (72) (66) 35) •LANDMARK Cans ■u ■■m■l En MT ,' ,7-: • now EMB ■ ■ \■ l iZZ -41r r • I j j i �k�+Itil� mm) L ■ couri till II Mr ED ® CUM - • ■1■ 338) (337) (281) ■■ MI I :1b16►1 UNOV W 1 I (7) (278) L. ANDMARK N (23) (22) (20 (20) 33 UUM 1 7091 749 747 1 745 1 1 743 1 1 805 8071 1 819 ?/7I 1901 9031 92/ 92.5 0 909 9/5 917 (4) 809 p// 813 815 (1) 1 927 9291 9.33 816 8/4 WESTBROOKE 1 902" 9001 1908 906( 9/2 9/4 8/2 .10 •Cr 1 , or .66'4. k ci Ilirtt o W ki �h Q k t k6 v 1 — • a _.?/7/Y9/1 d h o '09/ f •