Loading...
Cond. Use Permit-Apartment Complex• PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT NO. CUP86 -2 BACKGROUND: CITY OF HOPKINS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - APARTMENT COMPLEX February 14, 1986 PURPOSE: To review and recommend action on a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 324 unit apartment complex. Name of Applicant: Oakwood Development Company Address of Property: Feltl Court and Smetana Road Present Zoning: R -6 Nature of Request: To build a 324 unit apartment complex Reason for Request: Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for construction over $75,000. The applicant is proposing to construct two apartment buildings on a 20.3 acre site, consisting of a north building with 174 units and a south build- ing of 150 units. Ordinance 427.26(c) requires a Conditional Use Permit for construction over $75,000. The applicant is proposing to develop the site in two phases, the north building to be constructed first. Since the development is to be con- structed in phased the applicant is desiring to subdivide the subject site, however the application for the subdivision was not received in time for publication for this months meeting, this subdivision application will be addressed next month. Whole site: The proposed development complies with the following R -6 requirements: ORDINANCE PROPOSED Front yard 35 50 East side yard 20 50 West side yard 20 120 Rear yard 25 63 Minimum Lot area 16,000 857,700 Lot Area per unit (with credits) 2,150 2,647 Parking - 583 Building coverage 35% 26.7% Open Space ratio 1:1.25 1:4.00 Height 4 story 3 story Dwelling Floor Area 1 Bedroom 600 741 -726 2 Bedroom 720 996 -869 Over 2 Bedroom 840 - 2 J I 0itO 1111 REPORT NO. CUP86 -2 Page 2 Divided site: Parcel 'A' Front yard North side yard South side yard Rear Yard Minimum Lot area 16,000 Lot Area per unit ( Cvi i Ci►re-dttsj -2-,- sis0 Parking Building Coverage Open Space Ratio Height Dwelling Floor Area 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom Over 2 bedroom Parcel 'B' Ordinance 35 20 20 25 35% 1:1.25 4 story 600 720 840 Front yard 35 East side yard 20 West side yard 20 Rear yard 25 Minimum Lot area 16,000 Lot Area per unit (with credits) 2,150 Parking Building Coverage 35% Open Space ratio 1:1.25 Height 4 story Dwelling Floor Area 1 Bedroom 600 2 Bedroom 720 Over 2 bedroom 840 Proposed 64 63 60 200 -g34 - 13 l cl P p r 14.4m43 cL r / L 5j 3 story 741 -726 996 -869 50 50 120 30 —37-s79 3)5 8 3 2,526.48 Z.sos,DC 2-&4 -x`10 1 ctppro/ L.:_a,&s- approx. 3 3 story 741 -726 996 -869 clam -_C (01g 3 a-0 The ordinance does not address parking in an R -6 district. The applicant has provided 332 underground spaces and 251 exterior spaces. Both aprcels would seem to have adequate parking. If there exists a parking problem in - 1,2 0cgg o the future the applicant can expand the parking for 65 more cars on parcel A The existing site is comprised of two hills which the development will be built around. The visual impact of surrounding residential area will be minimal due to the retention of the existing hills and landscaping. Ap- proximately 20 feet of the north building will be visible from the resi- dential area to the east due to the retention of the existing hill. The south building and the top of the southern hill are approximately equal. The proposed development would require 272 trees. The proposed development exceeds this requirement with the combination of new plantings and the re- tention of existing trees. Ponds will be located throughout the site along with a bituminous path. The applicant is proposing tennis courts and a pool on the site. r • REPORT NO. CUP86 -2 Page 3 Access to the site will be from Felti Court off Smetana Road. St. Therese access will also be from Feltl Court, however, the traffic from St. Therese development should be not at a heavy volume considering the age of the resi- dents. Two emergency lanes will also be constructed. The trash containers will be located on the interior of the buildings, pickup will be at the entrance to the underground parking. Lights are distributed through the parking area. The proposed lighting is a 16 foot stell post with decorative "shoeboc" fixture hidden light source. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans and found the proposed plan as presented has met all his concerns, however, if parcel A is developed first, there must be two access points to the building. The proposed plan shows brick and wood siding for the exterior of the buildings. ANALYSIS: The proposed development meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance for an R -6 district and also the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. The development provides buildings which will take into consideration the current land configuration to provide a minimal visual impact to the surrounding parcels. The construction of the north building first will provide residents with all the recreational facilities planned for the whole development. The development appears to be a very attractive overall plan, both for the surround- ing parcels and the residents. The applicant has submitted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet. Any approval should be contingent upon a favorable outcome. The St. Therese development and vacant area will be located to the east, the . City landfill to the north, vacant area to the west and an old farm to the south. The City Engineer has reviewed the drainage plan and found it acceptable. The applicant has provided several ponding areas for drainage. The proposed plan shows a driveway easement from Felt] Court. Any approval should be contingent on the applicant securing an easement for the driveway. The applicant will have to secure approval from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as of the date of this report the applicant has not contacted the Watershed District. ALTERNATIVES: 1. Approve the plan as a whole, and not allow the applicant to subdivide. 2. Approve the plan to be built in two phases, allowing the applicant to subdivide. 3. Deny the Conditional Use Permit. Should you choose this option, you will have to identify findings of fact which support denial of the application. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend #2 above, granting the Conditional Use Permit for the con- struction of a 324 unit apartment complex with the following conditions: 1. A favorable outcome of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. 2. Approval of the subdivision REPORT NO. CUP86 -2 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: - continued 3. Securing a driveway easement 4. The parcels having two access points for emergency vehicles. The following Findings of Fact are suggested should the Commission recommend approval. 1. The proposed development conforms to the requirements of an R -6 District 3. The proposed development meets the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. Nancy S.lnderson, Analyst Community Development MENT DATA FY• U. 0 rr j !! ! I PT. BITUMINOUS PA ' • Existing Trees • i • Existing Trees I • ertrawitta.ii .SMETANA' stlr 02' . 15 E� �ROAD •_•_• • o . • 20.3 acres Parking F' (1.8 spaces /unit) Site Coverage, . W. 0.6 acres INTERIOR t 332 BUILDING FOOTPRIN 19.7 acres (857.700 3.1.) EXTERIOR 251 PARKING & DRIVE • POTENTIAL EXPANSION 65 POOL & TENNIS.CO� I LANDSCAPED OPE Ordinance 373 units — 3 UNITS 324 units • potential parking expansion to achieve - s I 2 spaces /unit shown with dashed tine on plan. • LIGHTS= 16' steel PLANT LIST C011p 11 E M Mr,Mlls Alt lip P giver !Mk MO .d 11neee Me MNe Pie M. Me 011 IIIN. mi., .111. Caftlaeled Cherry C {Mrnle. C.cltw• Pfttrom SMETANA weir." Pine Cart x1Itt Mr.'• COON.. Aire SP•ufe Piet , e4 aft {.1• . b .44 e. 1un/e {{rubs. J.• Iovpbe. Co-vac{ nb.•nr f> � r; Mums •Igb'.n. - SCeberi r M.S r4t11.t r Crltee .1 1.1.111111 2 I4 , 854 o 4 w W f AN tt M1 r W It W 03 111 31 1w / W 1S W IS 1N IS ON 21 1N 12 AN 111 i OVERSTORY TREES EVERGREEN TREES II J inQ T rees .410 .Err o:,_y F ._._._ROAD '01r1 r91WD Ef!' °< LANDSCAPE DATA, cc o Open Space i 628,950 8.1. Areas With Existing Dense Tree Cover_ 84,500 s.f. Net Open Space 549,850 s.f. Ordinance Requirement _ - 272 TREES (ti Proposed 207 88 ■ if= H 4t. SM ONa Ve s 0 D PARCEL 4 .. 11A ACRES 4 - - - - Existing Trees *!! - • I i■ PARCEL R i • L? ACRES 1 u „ ! ... . ! ! :El 1 ti I ! j ‚-4 1 , • .( Existing Trees , z ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT