Request for Proposals1170, �
6•
99921 A m � @o Nkmg@@a@
Central Business District
BLOCK 7
SEPTEMBER 1984
1
0
•
I. SITE C ;.'.- IRACTERISTICS
Tire Hopkins Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is presently
accepting proposals for construction of residential housing on a
redevelopment parcel of land directly adjacent to the Downtown Central
Business District. This property is within wa Zking distance of public
transportation, public offices, shopping and medical services.
The 1.97 acre site is 325 x 264.46. It is bounded by 11th Avenue South
to the east, 12th Avenue South to the nest, 1st Street South to the south,'
and the Suburban Chevrolet property line to the north. The present zoning
of R -5 (high density, muZtiple family residential) mould allow for a maxi-
mum density of 122 units. this density could be increased to approximately
143 units, should underground parking be provided or lot coverage be less
than 20 %. All public utilities are presently available.
The housing may be owner- occupied (townhouse, condominium, etc.) or a com-
bination of owner and rental. Emphasis should be directed toward family
occupancy. Amenities should be provided to accomplish this objective.
Office or service uses will be considered for first floor occupancy, pro-
vided such space is oriented towards occupancy by the residents of the
buiZding.
II ZONING REQUIREMENTS - Design considerations
Building coverage
30 %
Front Yard Setback
Side Yard Setback
Rear. Yard Setback
Building Height
30 '
15' or , the height,
whichever is greater
25' or z the height,
whichever is greater
4 story (May be increased
to 11 story or 110 ft.,
whichever is higher by
approval of a conditional
use permit.
The City is fairly flexible as relates to the designation of what yard
is front, rear, etc. Maximum setback and greenspace should be along
11th Avenue South and 1st. Street South.
Architectural design will be a key factor in selecting a developer. The
structure, or structures, as proposed should make an "architectural state-
ment" complementing both the older and newer buildings in the area. Brick
is a preferred construction material. The frontage of the building should
be along 11th Avenue South. Maximum design consideration should be given
to this exposure. No off - street parking will be allowed along this frontage.
i
PROP RIII Y C'O�T
The Hopkins HRA will sell the site w i th Clear t t i to the selected
developer for a price to be negotiated by the HRA and the developer.
In order to reimburse the [IRA for site assembly costs, the buildings
assessed value must generate sufficient taxable income to the City.
The exact price Will be based upon both the completed value or' the
development and the quality bf the project. All proposed projects
will be subject to a financial feasibility test. Based upon a 110-
120 unit development, it is estimated the land cost mould be $3.50 -
$4.50 a square foot or $2500 - $3500 per D.U.
IV. SUBI4ITTAL REQUIRE[ ENTS
Fifteen copies of the following material
interested developers by
to the address given at the close of this
should be submitted by
RFP.
1. A description of the project including
numbers of cidelZing units, sales price
or rent per unit, distribution of units
by number of bedrooms, size of dwelling
units, number of parking spaces, esti-
mated cost, and the anticipated market
value of the project.
2. A description of any special site develop-
ment or residential concept features, par -
ticularZzy those which the prospective de-
veloper considers unique or of notible
benefit to the City of Hopkins.
3. A preliminary site plan at a scale of 1:20
showing the proposed building, parking,
access, setbacks, and landscaping. An archi-
tectural rendering of the proposed develop-
ment is encouraged but not required.
4. Examples of previous residential development
experience of the proposer.
5. A copy of any market study performed by the
proposer for this location. (Any such study
submitted will be held in confidence.)
6. Financial reference letters from lending in-
stitutions.
•
- 3 -
7. A proposed time schedule for completion of the
project.
No additional material may be submitted after the submittal date unless
requested by the HRA. No changes may be made to any proposal after the
submittal date unless requested by the HRA.
Questions about the site, this Request for Proposal, or other elements
of the Block 7 Redevelopment Project should be directed to:
William P. Craig or James Kerrigan (612) 935 -8474
u
REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCEDURE
The initial review of proposals will be conducted by the HRA Executive
Director and staff, the Main Street Task Force and the Planning and
Zoning Commission. Personal interviews will be scheduled at this time.
Final selection of a developer will be by the HRA Board of Commissioners.
SELECTION CRITERIA
1. Residential development and management experience.
2. Financial capability of the proposer.
3. The physical development proposal and most specifically
architectural design.
4. Financial feasibility of project to reimburse HRA for
site assemblage costs.
5. Percentage of owner - occupied units. (The emphasis is on
owner- occupied).
6. Timeliness for undertaking project.
The HRA will assign approximately equal weight to the
above items.
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
The selected developer will be requested to submit a site
plan for review and approval by the Main Street Task Force,
Planning and Zoning Commission, and The City Council.
•
Negotiations for land sale and other site development matters
will be conducted. The selected developer will be required
to sign a redevelopment agreement with the Hopkins HRA guar-
anteeing a specific building and site design and resultant
assessed value subsequent to the sale of site.
SUBMITTALS
All-RFP's must be submitted to: WILLIAM P. CRAIG, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
HOPKINS HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1010 FIRST STREET SOUTH
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343
i
= `!J'-i -';• � /� _ : �l_•. �:�.'-,'; -- _ ' ,.r - _i;:•.I � �� _ _., _ - i t "r_',:�� �
:t PLYMOU.TH• '. _ -.i.c-S -- ' n _ .) •(.- �' ,�...'_ .. \y - !• -: '��.
LD'EN CEY -- r
_
'�;1� \ •, !_ _ • ( 1_I�1• }'I I: ' � ii' `` \. -. } - }) _ r ___, c: ��, j�`�;�' -'1 ;�.• / ^..._✓_ it �_1 •� ,� '
` ! y // 1' � ,` 1 1.� I - i -- !' i ,`Y ° •1,, h il` •�yy • %Cr:���•'Tr
r MriylV�A OGr,CB
RIDGE
C NTER
•�. - L ,( J �• - -•' '':'' ,' •': `.� t_' y I ,:. .;, - 1" ' c v .,`� '�•_;�
1 � � -: l _ ' • \� -.�` ;� . a _ ' =•`-- �;�� \ . `:; I:_ ;.,-`�r- :'L _Ill ,;•.
',t.' �; f I i �' ( • •t. __� is _I;� L• _ ". \t �t- .� . /� -�; �.1�/�1�: �• r' - -z
-; > \` -� :• ' /��:i: i Imo- - ..� � � , , - ,� 1' , /(;' ,' 't If _ ...•-f•. I, .,L.� -• ^:..
�;��= } ro9`v� : �, ��• t %,' = -i'i �l'"
'T,, tQNOLLVYDU�U•.:
ve, .w v r� �R: ' 1•' r is t-
V •� / — i fit= •�j` �.� ,, t \I f 'I ��.. !! ;,.�.: : Ate.,'^ -•.' � y-- �a.�i� .� � (� t...t i . ( .. -
`• I a
-
_�- .. .y;._> . ,� ....� -� ..�.. =....... -- �1� Vii �i =,. =..>;.r -
: •
1._� v��'f -�; i .t'2�`'. .` - L� • )PJ f .fi „.
11C ARIF \,l �:. i�t � .I._
Z SIT
__ .. .......... .1r- L
• ! I 1 ar .>itt \' •.�. _ C N
r j , - -.� /: - J y - �. �' _ Lr �:y ,• !r: l'$': �I 1= „ - M
_ . I G a ` jj .I � y 'I), .� f ti j. f�;:. \: • ' i :t— is t�:, _ R/C�rELr
tj
'� 1 `�a 1. � =� ' ,� --� � -\ � _ /'� % �. <`- � ( �..�•� t. � I 1 _ Z I
-
; �EQENPRAIRIE A' (r ,.. �: r _ .( may,,: - .tl�_ ,� �I }• i
V.
EOE
Ir
_ lLL
- [L
........... � .r ��,1 rl r ,..i._._.....1 - I _ � •r �1.. r ' Y' ; t � • �T� `!� i _
`�. 1 lV
-.Ic ........... , .. "'— �eioi
� \ , . • l ' I��,: Wit_..' � .1' ..., �_ —..
* MAJOR OFFICE CONCENTRATIONS
• ■ REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTERS
LOCATIONAL CONTEXT
figure 1
- H1L
- � ��h� .b� m1��L. LLLLLLIIIJJJIJJ t J f` 01 a.�• •_ ^�.�- o VG o �� 1 o \
3 f t' • m �� . Z '� �^C(I, r I O - -' ,,, _.° _ . cf�� _
UJ of
O, L °
P'�P �lV I- J �✓1m �_ N �� ���'_ 4� u \• y
�
J � ����`✓ � v . `�` � OC •��'r oG I(j ,.. 1. ^a I -
7S • GCG � •� `a J 4.. u f
- ti 7 NI_'nM P N. _
01 oC
1 ^r'� �` QI �"t I � `a a1 • o, _ ,�G I _ , �. m - I ., d� 160
Y - ,
.
o� 1 'x ,�Cry y�- r 1_ �� i-: � ,. tl . n to n �LS O - oS �� •{ f _ 1 \1 �. .� �1'�
�J ~�� - po1p` � ^ o or ' ,jl I �Lf:r + _`Y ' N �' �. ` {� I �N n m_ � • - � L .' 0 � ^ L2,r J n• - — f �` ti
' to I I l - b � •� � 7 � _
as
-r
} X N ^ I -20, _ to �, + of
:r•. \ , _ I m - __ .. .c m � •m P _ ev •Y J e � CIf ' :7C1 Ot� � __
.� r'P • g. - ° L �oR I / �_ NI^ �-' � _.. a'� K - II,, ,1 ,1 �`' __O � � �
..ter '• �� '-+ � i / ='
It m _ ^ �- Y 1 ly _ o.. i x G
0 o °
J1
, $ { -
T - V-2 Iw
_ )ttf < _. o t oT d� .� r nl , • i- � � 1
�vnt(�¢C£) ? �`' . . I<t.' i of to
^7S - .` .. .. r� )■etrw ".. ,� �: ko
v � F ! - ZEw n of as oc cr. a .°�.
o I r. .�. °i - _ ~ . •O - •°I �� ._N n_ P r e I ^� y I„ �.
O _
I
-^ -1 °I •., _�I, OP �� ,n .(� b r„ ,' nr N.�•_ )r eo �+ \
^•
G I 1 1 m r^ �•• ^� .„N N•�N Nw N�N„�•01� .•,^ �
LLJ
W •`. .,` • ....� 07 os - -- • ;
N
e
a � - y, h _ m ,TVI � a 1 oS ft crtf .a _ -�•'
,� O rry�) N �. 0 11 P • ft y � __ .If �,O � ^ Ip= �_ 1_
�f c u Gf
`, —„ •� N� _ _ — ^ Y lo�,�,� . fi __C.
O LILLI �•O t _0 1 - 1t -tf` N N • � i! ���I� _ - - MP^ '1 ~ w N • 'M ' WOY '-
•S•..• �' .�� a "Ll `� 1 � � 'OS I• Rt � 4 � � �= O d) � _.
ry o v. L.I
1 r o •� of O - t ��- N
H. n I '� r I • N e
-
•ry •^• rN•• N/� m ^.: ao^ ...r _ W
of I ry��` - n « /'. �� -N �� � yN _ o 01 •._
r � 05 G( .ft �� .' ' _�Xtf <. ' ".s� N _ N - N m ^ � _ �._o�..�P n,.l . 31 .. •- �.
X�S o _,� �• - -� vo «ntu.. /
as 09 OS �I - f1 1
act
~^ ` Q O O
'� H1 bl
of
b
• trf ry �--
•
=• P � n � ,^• ,..W n r • ^. �. of U
0
' Mai tlww" �mmj rti r mm.i tip
HOPKINS DOWNTOWN DEVELO STRATEGY
:
—r
Q Ptxe�tlal Future
fUSe Araa
r
'� rl
i
I I —_—
I �
Convenience
_ _ Shopping Center
lalu ' 4�1u"[ 1 NU ....
IIt'!1•A147F•1 :t i�411 M1 RIILOU Al IJ -'( - IM10'He• ;IP.f10'• .
.. el+tnuPJ*,E 1, ExrIWDTNi
I CLNYENIe /iCL. �ETNL
I t t
9ll• O O TIMI fX TNe NGRTN '
t* E OF F. E•ICi0. A`fE
9 1•`) �KNNf. • licfnl tt 1E hRXN M NI '
_\ RwUN'Qtl 3'N1F6{V:[E4
� 1Yf1pHMJ{YNUA U N. CJffl�lt ,
f J 1: !1 I 1 • 1
' •GOYt�allwR i WnT,cw,s ••• ; •�
� :.. ; � � IRIS *' �'. ;�• ` .
r . .... ... .....I - • -•• Office /l lotel
I L--F Entertainment Center
� IT'tVl.hRet CLrttlfx
,•♦ RYO'ly CiV IfAFR
•♦� • T1V L!C' f1rlRh Ct RJ[RIZ
l✓'.RL� , �'M , sd.4 li R'7
\ ii rrx� YF.tDfv<u1 Ll
�Nlllllhl_ lY ,llw•awr,,,;,,,,w,(\,�i. ,, nma�+ ...., 1
V II'hYlYln.,, /l/V1l NIIl1'{MRRN
�i e :� • r+or�t,/ct =ssa c�ns�sx t
`i L1
I. 111J
' Specialty
jf ti j i :(detail Core
: � . rt,lme \na NCThTION OF gIIpTIW IXA', ��_/
1
1 �. I • 1R ll4T reE 1(f [sLYf lOr,lL flT
_ -- .t .•.. ... _ ...r . no- Ew11�rtTpTll',,; • �
�1 1
FF
I I 4
^�
a
Lai
I I I 1
Cl i j
j �
/ / /.�
Nlbl•�e+o
( ' , • LMf4Nb16 61 taT /IµTT RlTNI- •
v --
� �
. PUllu 011 NIq O,UC. 6MJLL TbHll CJIMK.TF fI
i 1
I • YI.Ll�LC lr(1 ttt)n! hclflta (I,•Q1Z ll aHl O, slLYii)
'
I
• CFtI�TC ITZ''CfJI r.VVI VMNK 1lOHb
1
' I 1 Dih /f C1( `TIt. MLIJ. 1RxCIlnMrl hV.
i 1'1 1
�' ' ,
• U1'�1•I.tX T1l• PL U►.tY1RIN1 W.a..l
i I 4 ' t 1' 1
• /NfAIMK rRl�l� CNTTN K[t• Rf t.1TJn�i.
� I J I
• WLi 6C.NT. KI11•LL> tw E•e7
i I` �.�
1
'
- *D4.S�•� wntt 1117IGRK, Ul/JV•G.TCrt
(`
I.X ist Ir)q
1 I
Buildilx3s
Future
De,�lc>(xner,
Office/ Employment
Center
100' 200•
• f.INIDfYb, w1..xsvlvl
ra�uwTal,• lf•kt.On•Otl alrNOlre.e„et
J
MNi I.w 1KA IA.. Hp_.M _
0'
300
figure 3
I
;a V
figure 4
1 1
a
r �
t �
E
0
0
0
c 0
0
0
O 0
0 0
0 O
0 0
0 0
�UUJ LL
E
WRITTEN OPINION OF THE HOPKINS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
The Hopkins Planning and Zoning Commission provides a written opinion based
upon the following facts:
1) On November 8, 1976, the Hopkins Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
and on December 7, 1976, the Hopkins City Council approved a program for
the Redevelopment of the Downtown Central Business District Area entitled
"Hopkins CBD Redevelopment Program."
2) The HRA is presently involved in the process of acquiring certain properties
in order to implement the goal and objectives of CBD Redevelopment Program.
3) Minnesota Statute 462.356 Subd 2 requires that prior to a public bodies
acquisition or disposition of real property that a determination be made
that such action is in compliance with the existing Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning and Zoning Commission now advises the City Council, the Hopkins
Authority and all others that they have reviewed and discussed the acquisition/dis-
position of the following properties and it is the opinion of this Body that such
action is consistent with the Hopkins CBD Redevelopment Program and the Hopkins 1990
Comprehensive Plan.
9042- 906 -908 Excelsior Avenue West
918 -20 -22 -222 Excelsior Avenue West and
3 -5 -7 South Tenth Avenue
715 Excelsior Avenue West
717 Excelsior Avenue West
902 Excelsior Avenue West
9 - 9th Avenue South
�J