The URL can be used to link to this page

CR 10-021 Comprehensive Plan• February 25, 2010 G \TY OF 4* N0PKINS 2010 -2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN r� U U Proposed Action Council Report 10 -21 Staff recommends the following motion: adopt Resolution 10 -9 formally approving the 2010 -2030 Comprehensive Plan. Overview For the past several years the Zoning and Planning Commission, City Council, staff and residents have been working on updating the Comprehensive Plan. The plan was submitted to the Metropolitan Council for approval. On October 28, 2009, the Metropolitan Council approved the 2010 -2030 Hopkins Comprehensive Plan. The Metropolitan Council requires that after the Plan is approved by them the City must formally adopt the update within nine months. The action of the Metropolitan Council "Authorized the City of Hopkins to put its 2030 Comprehensive Plan Update into effect without any plan modifications." The most significant change from the current plan is the planning for the three transit stations on the Southwest LRT line. Attached is the 2010 - 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Primary Issues to Consider • What are the next steps? The staff will start implementing the plan. The first step will be rezoning various sites that are guided differently than currently zoned. Supporting Documents • 2010 -2030 Comprehensive Plan • Resolution 10 -9 J Nancy Anderson, AIC Planr �Ij Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: CITY OF HOPKINS • RESOLUTION NO. 2010-9 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2010 -2030 HOPKINS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864, requires local governmental units to review and, if necessary, amend their entire comprehensive plans and their fiscal devices and official controls at least once every ten years to ensure comprehensive plans conform with metropolitan system plans and ensure fiscal devices and official controls do not conflict with comprehensive plans or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hopkins authorized the updating of its Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the proposed City of Hopkins Comprehensive Plan is a planning tool intended to guide the future growth and development of the City; WHEREAS, the document presents the Comprehensive Plan for Hopkins, Minnesota, reflective of a community planning process conducted in the years 2007 through 2009 involving elected officials, appointed officials, City staff, an ad hoc committee, the public at large, and others; WHEREAS, before adopting the comprehensive plan or any section or amendment of the plan, the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing thereon; • WHEREAS, a notice of the time, place and purpose of a hearing on the proposed Comprehensive Plan was published in the official newspaper of the municipality at least then days before the day of the hearing, with a copy of the notice posted for public viewing; WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed Comprehensive Plan was mailed to adjacent cities, Hennepin County, the Hopkins School District, and Watershed Districts on July 2, 2008; WHEREAS, on February 17, 2009, the City Council approved the Comprehensive Plan contingent upon approval by the Metropolitan Council; WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 28, 2009, the Metropolitan Council completed its review of the City's updated Comprehensive Plan and made a finding that the City's Plan meets all Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements, conforms to the regional system plans transportation, including aviation, water resources management, and parks and is consistent with the 2030 Regional Development Framework, and is compatible with the plans of adjacent jurisdictions; and, WHEREAS, the City is now authorized to adopt the 2010 -2030 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hopldns, Minnesota, hereby adopts the 2010 -2030 Comprehensive Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 2010 -2030 Hopkins Comprehensive Plan shall become effective upon approval of this Resolution. • Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hopkins on March 2, 2010. • • ATTEST: Terry Obermaier, City Clerk Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor • • Ll ®PKI NS a community vested in threads of history, character, growth and progress Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® r� U • CJ Table of Contents Chapters I. Preface 2. Goals & Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) 2.1 -2.11 3. Community Demographics 3.1 -3.6 4. Land Use and Development 4.1 -4.28 5. Downtown Hopkins 5.1 -5.6 6. Housing 6.1 -6.20 7. Parks, Open Space and Trails 7.1 -7.16 8. Transportation 8.1 -8.10 9. Water 9.1 -9.17 10. Solid Waste 10.1 -10.4 11. Implementation 11.1 -11.4 Appendix Appendix A - Utility Plan Appendix B - Zoning District Summary Appendix C - Water Resources Management Plan Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©e • Twin Cites area communities are required to update their compre- hensive plans every ten years. By statute, comprehensive plans have a number of required elements that address potential future changes in land use, housing, parks, transportation and utilities. The 2008 Hopkins Comprehensive Plan addresses these topics but, more importantly, it attempts to position the community to proactively adjust to best meet and embrace the economic, societal and technical changes that will occur between now and 2030. The Metropolitan Council classifies Hopkins as a developed com- munity. Since virtually all of the land in Hopkins is fully developed, large scale land use changes are unlikely to occur. Current and future trends, however, will have a significant impact on the community. As this plan was being assembled, a number of trends were identified that are likely to impact Hopkins in the years ahead. Three of those general trends are particularly noteworthy. The population of the community will continue to change Hopkins' population is becoming increasingly diverse. Diversity will have an impact on housing choices, the demand for some types of re- tail goods, park and recreation services and social services. While the Comprehensive Plan attempts to address future population changes, determining how demographic changes will actually impact the com- munity will be an ongoing learning experience. Transportation modes are changing.... This Comprehensive Plan was assembled during a time of unprec- edented fluctuations in energy prices. Energy costs have influenced driving habits and people's preferences in transportation mode choices and have heightened the awareness of "walkablity." Hopkins is perfectly positioned to offer a wide range of future transportation options. It sits at the crossroads of major regional bike trails. The Southwest LRT CHAPTER I - PREFACE ! hold m comprehensive flan page 1 -1 CIJAPTER I - PREFACE H opkiflgS comprehen,r 1. corridor generally parallels Excelsior Boulevard through the heart of the community, and light rail is to serve Hopkins by 2015. Station area planning activities have identified opportunities for future land use changes that will create new, exciting places for people to live and work while supporting existing neighborhoods and businesses. Hopkins is a walkable community. Its traditional pattern of residential grid streets, neighborhood schools and churches and a traditional downtown make it convenient for people to move around the community on foot. Purchasing patterns forgoods and serviceswill continue to change.... Electronic commerce has been an influencing factor for the past decade. The number of people that purchase goods online increases annually. Despite this trend, communities still need a center for commerce and culture. Downtown Hopkins is that center. It has the mix of com- mercial uses, government services and recreational opportunities that make it a great place to gather. • S s page ] -1 The following statements are the goals of the City of Hopkins that guided the preparation of this update to the Comprehensive Plan. The City will refer to the Comprehensive Plan in establishing spending and action priorities. Protect the Residential Neighborhoods Hopkins is primarily a residential community, and its people are its strength. The City has established neighborhoods with well- maintained single and multi - family homes, mature vegetation and decades of per - sonal commitment. The effects of time, physical deterioration, changing tastes, market competition and, not least, the influence of traffic and nearby businesses may erode the quality of these neighborhoods and irrevocably change the nature of the community. The key elements protecting the residential neighborhoods are as follows: In new developments, efforts should be made to preserve as many residential structures as possible. Residential rehabilitation programs to preserve strong, well - maintained neighborhoods and protect investments in property should continue to be offered. • The housing maintenance code should continue to be enforced. This goal is addressed by all Comprehensive Plan elements. Protect and Enhance Downtown Hopkins The downtown area is loosely described as the B -2 and B -3 districts on Mainstreet from the block east of Fifth Avenue to Shady Oak Road. CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTt -j TE-s THREATS It is rare to discover a distinctive, pedestrian - scale, commercial area set in the heart of a small suburban community, but Hopkins has one. Hopkins comprehensive plan page 2 -1 Goals of the City of Hopkins CHAPTER ? - GOALS STRENGTHS V1'EAKNESSI 01 P • Do,wntow n H, >pkins and Main street give the Cite a strong central fOCI , and sense of place, or identity, that many ether communities find very difficult to recreate. !Major improvements have been made downtown in recent years through public - private cooperative efforts. The key elements to improve the commercial downtown are as follows: • Elfurts should he made to retain existing dov ntow n businesses and attract new specialty retail, entertainment and rc,taurant businesses to Alainstreet. • '1'he do\ ntu« n business climate ,hould be monitored continu- all\. • Rcsidcnts should be cncoura`cd to shop locally and support Hopkin, businc,scs. • Elfurts ,huuld he made to enhance the Mainstrect cxperience. Dcsign features such as white lights, public art and plantings should he encouraged. • De\elopment efforts should continue Nvith an emphasis on the pri\ate sector and less public financing involvement. Both the Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Plan [<n Economic Dew]- • opment address this goal. Identify and Assist In the Redevelopment of Blighted or Obsolete Structures • Improvement of industrial and commercial businesses should continue to he encouraged to ensure that the limited amount of nun - residential land in Hopkins can he used to its lull po- tential. • Rehabilitation should he encouraged in multi - family structures huilt at approximately the same time that lack mane amenities found in more recently constructed, multi - family structures. Fhe Comprehensive Plan and the East End Study address this goal. Bolster the Image of the Community and Promote Hopkins As a Destination Hopkins has mane assets and unique dualities that set it apart from other cnmmunities. Thee assets include Mainstreet, the regional trail head, the Center low the Arts and small-town convenience. The perception of . Hopkins outside of its boundaries varies with uian people in the west m m o N 1_ metro and greater etr areas, who are unaware of its draw. Ho Klnes comprehensn page 1 -1 L - -I Businesses, civic groups and residents will benefit from an improved image and exposure. This can be accomplished through implementing the "Think Hopkins" marketing plan. All comprehensive plan elements address this goal. Maintain Fiscal Health and An Acceptable Balance Between Service Quality and Property Tax Rates Residents and business people have traditionally supported this aim. Demonstrating responsibility in fiscal matters, while having obvi- ous local benefits, would also aid the City in its public relations with prospective residents and business owners. The methods to maintain fiscal health and an acceptable balance among City service provided, quality of life and property tax rates are as follows: • Pursuit of redevelopment, which adds to the tax base, should be continued. • Efforts should be made to continue to foster stability and growth of existing businesses, while encouraging new businesses to locate in Hopkins. • Investment in infrastructure should continue. All comprehensive plan elements address this goal. Influence Transportation Transportation in the 21 st century does not include just building and improving roads. The Southwest LRT is becoming more of a reality for Hopkins. The Alternative Analysis has been completed, and the environmental study is underway. The most optimistic date for con- struction of this line is 201 S. Since the last Comprehensive Plan update, Excelsior Boulevard has been improved with landscaped medians, signage, and lighting. Upkeep of this road is important for the image of Hopkins. The elements to influence transportation are as follows: CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STRENGTFIS WEARNESSES OPPORTUNTTTES THREATS • Efforts among Hopkins, Minnetonka and Hennepin County should continue for the improvement of Shady Oak Road be- tween Excelsior Boulevard and State Highway 7. This road is scheduled for upgrading in 2014. • Efforts should be made to improve Blake Road from Excelsior H Opk111e5 comprehensive�lan page 1 -3 CHAPTER 2 - GOALS S'TRFN(iTHS WEAKNESSES 01T ;' , . 1 , , I , ' 0 Boulevard to Highv av 7. These improvements should include signage, special paring, landscaping, li and sidexvalks. • Ellorts should continue to support the SouthNxest Light Rail Transit (LRT). • Thrce LRT stations are proposed for Hopkins. One at Shady Oak Road, a second at Eighth Avenue aloe` Excelsior Boulevard and a third near Blake Road. Redevelopment around all three stations will occur. "The Station Study supports these stations and the redevelopment around the station.. • The link between Mainstreet and Excelsior Boulevard aloe` Eighth Avenue froin the regional trail (noNv) and proposed LRT station (future) should he improved. • Ef(�,ris should he made in cooperation with the County to finish the improvement "I' Excelsior Boulevard from Blake Road to Meadow brook Road. H opkim comprehetw% , -_ page 2 -4 X11 comprehenAve plan elements address this ( Involve and Inform Residents, Employees and Business Owners • Communication tools, including the newsletter, Citv «-cl) site and c - nc\\ slcttcr should be expanded and improved. • All residents and business o\ti nerS, including those under- represented groups such as renters and new residents, should he encouraged to be engaged. Protect and Enhance Green Space, Park Environments and Sustainability • Our natural cnvironnnental assets should be protected. • Green de\elopment should be encouraged. Work should continue on trail connections and updating parks. Develop rrs should be encouraged to incorporate more green space in projects. Additional re\ enue sources to Support this goal should be idcnt,fird. • • Strengths -Wea knesses- Opportunities- Threats To properly frame a strategy for moving the community toward the future, it is important to understand its strengths, weaknesses, op- portunities and threats. For the current update to the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission reviewed this information, incorpo- rated components of the Hopkins Strategic Plan and made appropriate modifications. The community's strengths, weaknesses, opportuni- ties and threats were subsequently reviewed by the public during the preparation and review of the plan. The recommended updates are summarized below. Strengths of Hopkins Sense of Community Hopkins exudes a sense of community that is found in few metropolitan area communities by virtue of its population size, geographic size, stable and cohesive residential areas, identifiable downtown retail and civic areas, community celebrations (notably the Raspberry Festival) and residents. The school district is geographically focused on Hopkins. A sense of pride and identity exists. Identifiable Downtown Downtown Hopkins is one of a small number of established central shopping districts in metropolitan area communities. It remains well - known and identifiable on a small scale and a focus of the community. Several private and public improvements have occurred in recent years, and a successful balance of land uses and business types has allowed it to remain stable in various market conditions. Employment Base Hopkins has a high number of jobs representing a wide variety of em- ployment sectors for a community of its size. Location CHAPTER ? - GOALS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTUNITIES THREATS Hopkins is strategically located relative to the City of Minneapolis and 40 other western suburbs. u i_, �O�k111e5 comprehensive flan page 2 - CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STRENGTHS WE WNESSLS 01 is Access The Cite has excellent access via federal, state and county roadways, freight railroads, a trail sNstc•m 1'Or both walking and biking, accessible sick-walks throe lout the conununity, and the planned light -rail transit system. Hopkins is ease to access fi outside and case to navioate within. Variety of Housing Types Hopkins has a wide variety of housing for people in every stage of the life cycle and every income category. Variety of Development Types The coniniunitv Is composed of several types of' housing, retail and service businesses, industry, and public and private recreational facili- ties. Attractive Residential Neighborhoods Fherc are a number of distinct and identifiable residential ncighbor- hoods defined b\ roadways, gull courses, parks and creeks. Strong School District The school district has a strong reputation and is a compelling reason to live in the Citv. Good Municipal Service Delivery Conununity opinion surveys have typically indicated a high level of sat- isfaction with the delivery oftnunicipal services such as snoxyplowing, parks, police and fire protection and trash collection. `uryey updates occur on a regular basis. Excellent Community Facilities IlopkHis olfer. an excellent array of public facilities from parks to special use:. Fhe Hopkins Center lc)r the arts, Fhe Depot, Hopkins .Activity Centcr, Third Lair tikatc Park and the Hopkins Pavilion arc other examples ol' facilities that inert the nerds of residents as Nyell as metropolitan area residents and visitors. The City's collaboration with the school district and the City of'Ntinnctonka in the Lindbergh Center is an example of the City's ability to partner with adjacent communities to provide uniciue amenities to the public, tihady ( -)ale Beach and %Villiston Fitness Center are also examples ofcollaborations with the CltN of \linnctolika. K ot�kin� comprehens„ page 2 -6 0 Active Citizen Participation Hopkins' government actively involves the people of the community. The City includes citizen participation in the establishment of policy and the assembly of specific plans. Examples include the assembly of the East End Study and the Shady Oak Road Corridor Plan. Citizens Academy offers citizens an opportunity to learn about the internal workings of City government. A Tradition of Community Events Hopkins gathers every year to celebrate the Raspberry Festival. This highly - successful event fosters a sense of community pride and en- hances the image of the community. Other recurring community events include Music in the Park, Heritage Days, Farmers Market and Mainstreet Days. Weaknesses of Hopkins Aging Housing Stock Most of the Hopkins housing stock was built prior to 1960 and some of it prior to 1930. The city has a significant number of small, post- war houses that lack many features and amenities that families and individuals desire in the contemporary market. As these structures age, their desirability may continue to decrease. Property owners may not be eager to reinvest in aging housing stock because their potential is limited by their size, floor plan, garage and lot area. Downtown in Need of Continued Improvement In recent years, downtown Hopkins has made great strides in re- estab- lishing its sub - regional prominence as a commercial and entertainment center. To see continued improvement, downtown Hopkins will need to continue to promote a stable mixture of retail and service businesses, offices, goveriunent offices, entertainment and attached housing. CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES OPPORTL -N=S THRr.ATs Major Roadway and Industrial Areas Divide the Residential Community The community is divided by TH 169, Excelsior Boulevard (County Road 3), and TH 7. In addition, the industrial area along Excelsior Boulevard separates two major residential neighborhoods from the rest of the community. H0f?kln8 comprehensive plan page 2 -7 CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STREN6111S WEAKNESSE, (ii Pi is Image of the Community In the Minds of Non Residents Non- residents have inconsistent and sometimes negative perceptions of the City. Physical Appearance Along Certain Major Traffic Corridors Excelsior Boulevard has been reconstructed lroni tihady ()ak Road to Blake Road. The abutting land use ()n the north side ol'Excelsior Boule- vard li-om the railroad tracks to Blake Road needs redevelopment. The redevelopment ol'this area is addressed in the Fast End Studv. Shadv Oak Road is also in need of Nvidening and redevelopment. Because the areas abutting these corridors are the dominant images that many people have (,'the conlnlunity, this impression takes away front the many positive aspects of' the community. Tax Base Constraints Because the City is nearlN fully developcd, there is little opportunity to expand the tax base Without redeveloping property Mainstreet Visibility Mainstrc•et is not visible Irons major corridors. Opportunities for Hopkins Access Via Light -rail Transit I'llrce light -rail stations are plamled to serve Hopkins. 'l he three station cites are proposed in the areas of' Shady Oak Road, Fighth Avenue and Blake Road. Fhe rail line Nvill pass through Hopkins roughly paral- lel tO FSCCIAio r Boulevard. In order to preserve suture options, the Comprehensive Plan update will continue to plan fi the proposed three station:. Fhe light -rail system, at the earliest, is projected to be constructed in 01 S. Light rail transit would bring mane people into Hopkins daily and improve access not only from Hopkins to'Minne- apolis but also front 'Minneapolis (and other locations) to Hopkins. A Resurgent Downtown Downtown Hopkins has accomplished several changes in its econoulic Structure, ph\ sisal design and administrative organization an(] appears N ( KopkirigS comprehensn page 2 -8 0 ready to take the next steps toward revitalization. Destination shopping and continued marketing efforts should strengthen the Downtown's role in the region. The Future of the Retired Landfill in Southwest Hopkins The landfill is a large parcel of undeveloped land, but the expense of cleaning the contamination for re -use will be great. Re- purposing the site will require strategic partnerships will the MPCA and other funding agencies, which may require that the end use have some public good, such as "green" uses that create alternative energy. Improvement of the Excelsior Boulevard /Shady Oak Road /Blake Corridors The reconstruction of Shady Oak Road offers the City redevelopment opportunities along this corridor. This redevelopment also could of- fer a partnership with Minnetonka for redevelopment of properties on the south side of Excelsior Boulevard from Hopkins Tech Center to Shady Oak Road. Capitalizing on Hopkins' Self - contained, Small -town Image This image is, perhaps, Hopkins' strongest long -term asset and op- portunity, as it is a characteristic of which few other communities can boast. East End Redevelopment The East End has the potential for redevelopment in the next 10 years. The East End Study is in place to guide the area, and the Comprehen- sive Plan will continue to plan for improvements in the Blake Road Corridor. Growing Diverse Population Hopkins has a growing diverse population. This population has the potential to bring new ideas, entrepreneurial spirit, and changing needs to the City. CHAPTER ? - GOALS STRENGTHS WEAKNT.SSE^S OPPORTLi'.MMS THREATS Compact Size With Identifiable Neighborhoods Hopkins has many unique and identifiable neighborhoods. This char- acteristic offers these neighborhoods the opportunity to organize and improve their sense of community and quality of life in Hopkins. i HOpkim comprehensive plan page 2 -9 CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES 0,T 11 1 Unique Public Facilities That Are Under - utilized The Depot, The Hopkins Center for the Arts and the Pavilion are unique public facilities. the Depot has formed a partnership with Three Risers Park District, and has the opportunity to expand the services of the tacilitv. The Hopkins Center for the Arts has recetuth been restructured in a way that will increase utilization. There is the potential Inr the Pavilion to add events during the year. Large Corporate Presence Not Being Tapped SuperValu, The Blake School, \Falser Automotive, Hopkins Honda, and Cargill hays a large corporate presence in Hopkins. The City has the opportunity to partner with these corporations to increase their contribution to the conuuunity. Opportunity to Expose Natural Corridors Minnehaha and Nine Mile Creek run through Hopkins. These creeks have the potential to he stronger amenities for the Citv through in- creased risibility and access. Community Confidence 0 A recent survey indicated that residents have strong con irimuty confidence. "Think Hopkins" the marketing etic,rt "Think Hopkins" is promoting a positive image of the Cite. Improvement in Transit Use Hopkins is fortunate to he served with adequate bus routes and transit stops, but there are opportunities to increase ridership through im- proved transit stops and access. Threats to Hopkins Industrial and Multi- family Building Obsolescence A few of Hopkins' industrial and multi -fanuh sites are aging, have obsolete buildings and /or lhaye physical site constraints such as con- tamination. These site, may need public financing to make redeyelop- ulent a possibility. fl H 1_, opk1m .a lrehensi page 1 -10 • Consumer Retail Trends Downtown Hopkins is experiencing steady improvement, but the threat remains that retail trends and market forces may negatively impact the business climate, leading to decline. Demographic Changes Desire for larger living space and modern amenities, coupled with a large post -WWII housing stock that can be cost - prohibitive to re- model, could contribute to a loss of families living in Hopkins. This loss of families, combined with decreasing average household size and an aging population, may negatively impact businesses, schools and the community as a whole. Aging of Public Infrastructure Hopkins is over 100 years of age, and most of its streets and sewer and water lines were constructed many decades ago. There is a need for continuing investment in infrastructure. Light Rail Transit (LRT) Although Hopkins is not proposed to be the end of the LRT line, the realities of federal funding may prohibit the line from extending into Minnetonka. The end of the line would require a larger park and ride facility and possibly the maintenance facility. These facilities are con- sidered not the best use of Hopkins' valuable land. • CHAPTER 2 - GOALS STRENGTHS WE4KNESSES OPPORTUNMES THREATS H Opk111cd comprehensive plan T page 2 -11 • • • household and economic trends. Demographic data available for the preparation of this plan is from the 2000 census, data that is eight years old. Although dated, information from 1990 and 2000 does still serve as an indicator of future influencing factors. Going forward, Hopkins will consider future data sources as they become available to better inform future planning decisions. Regional Forecasts The planning horizon for this plan is the year 2030, which is consistent with the regional system plans prepared by the Metropolitan Council as required under the Metropolitan Land PlanningAct. The plan is also consistent with the Metropolitan Council 2030 Regional Development Framework that designates the City as a "Developed" community. The framework provides regional forecasts for each community in the seven - county metropolitan area. Table 3.1 - Metropolitan Council's 2030 Regional Forecasts CHAPTER 3 - COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHICS Hopkins will continue to experience additional growth over the next 20 years. A majority of this new growth will come through redevelopment initiatives. Redevelopment initiatives are discussed throughout the plan. Population Between 1990 and 2000, Hopkins' population increased about 4 percent. The Metropolitan Council anticipates a pattern of minor increases in population between now and 2030. Hooking comprehensive plan page 3 -1 1990 2000 Revised Development Framework 2010 2020 2030 Population 16,534 17,637 17,900 18,600 18,900 Housing 7,973 8,359 8,500 8,800 9,000 Employment 12,252 1 11,777 13,600 1 14,800 J 16,300 Hopkins will continue to experience additional growth over the next 20 years. A majority of this new growth will come through redevelopment initiatives. Redevelopment initiatives are discussed throughout the plan. Population Between 1990 and 2000, Hopkins' population increased about 4 percent. The Metropolitan Council anticipates a pattern of minor increases in population between now and 2030. Hooking comprehensive plan page 3 -1 CHAPTER 3 - CoN1N1UNir1 DENT( !' I , Hopkins has seen a ,i(Tnificant chan`e in lOreitin -barn re,idents, as has the State of 'Minnesota. BetNyeen 1990 and 2000, the state's forei`n- born Population increased 130 percent. I'he influx Nvas massive enou`Th to rank 'Minnesota 1 2th nationally in the rate of iinniigrant population Uro« ahead of California, Florida and'Icxas. 'Minnesota has the lam- est population of Somali innni(Trants in the country 9, 300 according to the 2000 census, and the second laruest population of Hinong, after Calif'Ornla. About +2,000 'Minnesotans �yere born in Mexico, makin6 that country the largest single nation of origin for innni` rants in the state. hnmi` rants have been attracted to jobs and a dvnamic economy that Nyas Particularly strong in the latter half of the 1990s and the be- tiinnin(l of the 2000s. In :Minnesota, the k in Cities captures rott( SO percent of all im- migration. Being a close -in suburban community, Hopkins has seen sik7niiic ant inc reases in innniorant populations.The 2000 census counted over 113,000 innnigrants in the'kvin Cities suburbs and exurb, more than the total liyin in the central cities and a 150 percent increase over 1990 This trend of increased inuni` ration and chanainu denao`raphics is likely to he one of the defining elements of Hopkins over the next decade. Changes in population Will influence housing choices, jobs, schools and recreation. 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1) V CO M W White BlackorAfrican Americanlnclian American or Native Alaskan 0 M M C M [} O Mr - _ Asian Some other Two or more race races ■ 1990 Cl 2000 H opkins comprehensive : I ., page 3 -2 Table 3.2 - Race U is • LI • Age Census data shows Hopkins to be getting older (see Table 3.3). This is a clear representation of the Baby Boom generation. Baby Boomers are 45 to 64 years in age and were born post World War II, making up a significant portion of the United States population. Hopkins and the region have recognized the challenges likely to be faced with an aging Baby Boom population. An issue that is reflective of this trend is the decrease in household size (see Table 3.4). This is a result of an increase in the number of empty nesters. As the population ages and households become smaller, the demand for new housing will have an increasing focus on attached units. This trend could actually bode well for Hopkins because future redevelopment is likely to include predominately attached, higher density housing. CHAPTER 3 - COM11h1t;Nii - Y' DEMOGRAPHICS Horking comprehensive plan page 3 -3 Table 3.3 - Age by Group Ctt.apreR 3 - COMMLAiry Di m Table 3.4 - Household Size 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 1.82 1.83 Rental housing ❑ 1990 ■ 2000 Housing • ()ne (& Hopkins' greatest assets fs its established single - family neigh boyhood,. Being a developed community limits the City's ability to expand its single - family housing stock. \env single family homes have been a result >f infill development or redevelopment initiatives. More recent housing projects have included higher density developments such as the 'Marketplace Lofts in dovvntoNvn Hopkins and the Suntunit on'FH %. The housing chapter provides a more detailed report on the current housing trend: in Hopkins. Employment Historically, the majoritv of Hopkins' emplovment base has been industrial uses, influenced by the location of the tioo Line Rail Road, xyhich provides easv access to ship goods. Uver the past few decades, emplovincnt has shifted to more mana and professional posi tion: (sce fable 3. S.). A recent office development, Cargill, has created 3,300 new jobs in Hopkins; Ihowever, industry and production is still a significant contributor to employment opportunities. Tlyo of the larg- est emplovers in Hopkins, tiuperValu and \:CPC() International, Inc., provide ?,50(1 manufacturing and production jobs. Uki ng comprehensi< c _I page 3 -J 2.44 2.37 � 1 All households Owned housing • Table 3.5: Employment by Profession CHAPTER J - COMMUMTY DEMOGRAPHICS Education The City is located in the Independent School District (ISD) #270 which includes six elementary schools, two middle schools and a high school. Charter and private schools are also located in Hopkins. The City is home toThe Blake School, Ubah Medical Academy and the Main Street School of Performing Arts. Enrollment in Hopkins schools has been steady throughout the years, with the exception of the recent Baby Boom generation. As families from this era age in place, their children are graduating and moving out of their parents' homes. This trend poses challenges in maintaining steady enrolhnent in the schools and, in fact, enrollments at the present time are declining. The City of Hopkins can support the Hopkins public schools by keeping the community a desirable place to live, thereby attracting new families and school -aged children. • H opkins comprehensive plan page 3 -S 45% o o o 40% M 35% o 0 ID 30% f+ � N 25% C ° 20% 7 a N o C 15% CL 10% o 00 5% V 0% o 0 0 Management, Service Sales, office Farming, Construction, Production, professional fishing, forestry extraction, transportation maintenance ■ Hopkins ■ Hennepin County ■ Twin Cities SMSA Education The City is located in the Independent School District (ISD) #270 which includes six elementary schools, two middle schools and a high school. Charter and private schools are also located in Hopkins. The City is home toThe Blake School, Ubah Medical Academy and the Main Street School of Performing Arts. Enrollment in Hopkins schools has been steady throughout the years, with the exception of the recent Baby Boom generation. As families from this era age in place, their children are graduating and moving out of their parents' homes. This trend poses challenges in maintaining steady enrolhnent in the schools and, in fact, enrollments at the present time are declining. The City of Hopkins can support the Hopkins public schools by keeping the community a desirable place to live, thereby attracting new families and school -aged children. • H opkins comprehensive plan page 3 -S CHAPTER I - COMMUNITY DI NI( 1 � I Table 3.6: Education Obtainment 3,500 t 3,000 v 0 2,500 m N 2,000 Ln T � 1,500 0 1,000 a 0 °- 500 0 High school Some college, Associate Bachelor's Graduate or graduate no degree degree degree professional (includes degree equivalency) ❑ 1990 ■ 2000 H opkins comprehens�Y C p IL T - page 3 -6 0 • to Less than 9th 9th to 12th grade grade, no diploma • Overall Pattern The land use pattern of Hopkins has evolved over the last century and is well established (see Figure 4.1: Existing Land Use Map). In the years ahead, the focus for Hopkins will not be on new development, but on redevelopment or underdeveloped sites. Recent redevelop- ment initiatives have included preliminary planning for the Blake Road Corridor, initial planning for the redevelopment of the Shady Oak Road corridor and long -range planning for the Southwest Light Rail Transit (LRT). These projects and others may impact the exist- ing land use pattern and are discussed further in this section of the Comprehensive Plan. Redevelopment projects that have recently been completed include the Marketplace Lofts in downtown and the Excelsior Crossings located in the northeast quadrant of TH 169 and Excelsior Boulevard. Both projects have proven to fit the overall char- acter and cohesiveness of Hopkins and can serve as models for other redevelopment initiatives. Only a few undeveloped parcels of land remain. Underutilized sites and, more particularly, inappropriate uses of land are the major issues now confronting the community. Downtown Hopkins Perhaps one of Hopkins' greatest assets is its Downtown. The Down- town has changed over the years from an important and vibrant retail center to one that serves local convenience needs and certain spe- cialty market niches. The dynamics of consumer preferences and the transportation network have caused such shifts in many older central shopping areas. Downtown Hopkins still, however, possesses a special character. The character of the area can be used to help reposition it to respond to contemporary market challenges and opportunities but not without the combination of private and public efforts. CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT There has been considerable public investment and interest in Downtown in the past, and that trend is continuing. Without ques- tion, Downtown Hopkins is one of a limited number of recognizable H i_ �Opk1m cdmprehensive l,lan page 4 -1 Introduction Hopkins Downtown Antique Shops Regency Townhomes 0 0 -- —' ---- Ed ------ T '-------^--------'~-~~ . Land o~ Land U Acrt-s Percent 4. HOPkinoS . '"o"+-2 :7 central community shopping areas in the Metropolitan Area. It is an asset worth protecting. The community recognizes the importance of the Downtown and has a strong positive emotional response to the location. Residential Neighborhoods Another one of Hopkins' greatest assets is its neighborhoods of single- family homes, which accommodate residents of all ages. These neighborhoods give Hopkins its character and cohesiveness; however, acceptance of some of the smaller, post -war homes may wane as time goes by and long -time residents move out. Protecting these neighbor- hoods from inappropriate development and the effects of aging as well as preserving a strong social fabric will continue to be major challenges for the community. In the future, redevelopment may threaten exist- ing single- family homes. The City needs to consider means to restrict the loss of single- family housing. • Industrial and Commercial Areas Hopkins has long been an important center of employment and com- merce in the western suburbs as a result of its streetcar, highway, and railroad service. Industrial development and redevelopment continue to be important to the community for purposes of tax base and em- ployment. The City has invested staff time and financial resources to leverage private investment and is committed to an ongoing effort of business recruitment and development. Excelsior Boulevard, Shady Oak Road, TH 7 and Blake Road have al- ways been important roadways in Hopkins because they serve as a local access for commercial, industrial and residential neighborhood areas. Over the past few years, the City has worked with Hennepin County and other agencies to improve these corridors. The City has recently reconstructed Excelsior Boulevard to improve both its function and aesthetics. The recent enhancement of the corridor gives Hopkins a recognizable gateway into the community. The City should continue to aggressively pursue reconstruction and aesthetic improvements eastward to the St. Louis Park border. • CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT r edium rDensity idential "175.02 Residen Hi h Density Residential 142.52 Commercial 114.53 B usiness Park 68.52 Industrial 280.40 Public / Institutional 122.20 Open Space 42.52 Golf Course 214.19 Park 96.19 T rail 46.86 Railroad 23.41 W etland 139.18 ROW 477.89 Total: 2,616.28 Table 4.1- Existing Land Use (Net Acres) Kopkim cornl)rehensive plan page a -3 Single Family Homes SAM's Enterprise CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DI , , I Goals A set of overall tioals provides a I'ramework 1Orr land use initiatives in Hopkins. Pertaining to land use, the ('itv of Hopkins seeks to: Maintain a viable downtown commercial core. Downtown Hopkins has a unique commercial business core. Maintaining the viability of downtown is dependent on the success of its businesses. Redevelopment in and around downtown Hopkins will occur over the next 30 years. Additional commercial development is likely to occur along Excelsior Boulevard, Shady Oak Road and possibly Blake Road. The City will need to carefully guide additional commercial development in a manner that is supportive of downtown. Maintain a strong employment base. Much of Hopkins' job base is dependent on the success of industrial uses located in the southern portion of the community. It is important for the City to maintain industrial uses that will provide job opportunities. The City will work to ensure these sites are utilized to their full potential as redevelopment occurs and will encourage private reinvestment. • Continue to emphasize compatible land uses between adjacent jurisdictions. Hopkins is adjacent to the Cities of Minnetonka, Edina and St. Louis Park with similar land use patterns occurring along most common borders. The City will continue to work with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure seamless land use patterns along the respective borders, particularly along Excelsior Boulevard. • Maintain appropriate transitions between land uses. Hopkins is a fully developed community and will likely see new development through redevelopment initiatives. The City will work to ensure appropriate transitional uses and buffering between new and existing land uses. • Take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to capture future Light Rail Transit (LRT) initiatives. The Southwest LRT line passes directly through Hopkins, creating redevelopment opportunities at and around three potential station locations. These redevelopment opportunities may occur prior to any LRT improvements. Therefore, the City will work to ensure that new redevelopment in and around future station areas is appropriate and consistent with future transit improvements. Continue to coordinate land use and transportation needs. An effective transportation network is vital to the future of Hopkins and its redevelopment efforts. Over the next 20 years, traffic volumes on local roadways will continue to increase and added congestion will occur. The City will continue to assess the relationships between land use and transportation in two ways: by assessing the impacts of redevelopment on the existing transportation systems and, in some cases and locations, assessing the impacts that new transportation improvements will have on land use. Hopkin's comprehensi , ; page 4 -4 • .7 • • Natural Protection Areas There are two locations of special natural significance in Hopkins: Nine -Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek. Each is protected by the rules and regulations of aWatershed District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. In addition, the City of Hopkins has approved zoning regulations to complement the efforts of those non - municipal agencies. The Nine -Mile Creek basin in southeast Hopkins is being protected for purposes of flood protection, wildlife protection, agri- culture, natural beauty, and passive recreation. The Minnehaha Creek basin does not include agriculture but does include active recreation such as canoeing. Other natural areas include a park and trail system that is further dis- cussed in the Park, Open Space, andTrail chapter. Land Use and Development Plan • Land Use Plan Categories In addition to the standard residential, commercial and industrial land use categories, the future land plan uses a mixed land use category (see Figure 4.2: Land Use Plan). The purpose of the mixed -use category is to accommodate a variety of planning initiatives and land uses that may occur around the proposed LRT stations. The following is a review of all of the land use patterns used in the plan. Low Density Residential The majority of Hopkins existing housing stock falls within the low density residential land use category at 1 -7 units per acre. This cat- egory accommodates the existing single- family detached housing that contributes to Hopkins' character and cohesiveness. CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPIMENT Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential uses include attached residential units, predominantly townhomes or condominiums ranging from 8 -16 units per acre. Hopkins comprehensive flan page J -i CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE A \D DI \ I ,, P I L ow Density Residential Net Acres 686.44 M edium Density Residential 163.37 Hi h Density Residential 144.+3 Commercial 91.27 B usiness Park 111.77 Industrial 164.70 Mix ed Use 97.00 Public / Institutional 112.37 P ark 94.11 Open Space 4S.S6 Golf Course 214.19 T rail S0.4S Railroad 23.47 W etland 139.18 ROW 477.89 Total: 2,616.28 Table 4.2 - Planned Land Use (Net Acres) Kobkim « „nprehensi\ c : page 4-6 High Density Residential High Density Residential includes multi-unit and multi - building deyel- opments. The high density category accommodates mrn intense hous- ing, such as apartments and condominium developments. The density range for this category estahlishes a minimum threshold of 17+ units per acre, ultimately resulting in multi- storied structures. Commercial Commercial land uses offer a wide variety of goods and services. Hop- kins connucrcial uses arc primarily located along major transportation corridors ( Excelsior Boulevard 8, 'pH 7), which serve both regional and community needs. Commercial uses located downtown largely serve local needs and specialty market niches. Overall, these `gods and services range tram grocery stores, salons, dry cleaners, retailers and coffee shops Mixed Use l'he Mixed Land Ilse category is intended to capture anticipated redr yclopmcnt inil iativcs associated with the proposed LM' stations. Each station area is likely to redryclop in a mined - use t\�)e fashion. The density range fix this category establishes a mininnnn threshold of 30+ units per acre. It is assumed the mixed use catcgory «-ill develop at 60° o residential and 40') o connucrcial. The Hopkins Station area Plan com- plctcd in 2008 addresses preferred density rantics and uses at each LR F station. ,additional planning efforts have also addressed station locations. I'hc East Hopkins I and tlse and 'Market Study provides a lramcw 1o,r future land uses near the Blake Station Area.'l he Hopkins Station Area Plan and East Hopkins Land Use and 'Market study both support milcd use development and are rcllcct(.d in the land use plan. Land guided l(,r mixed uses is located in three areas of the conununity: 1) Shady Oak Station Area, 2) Hopkins Downtown Station Arca and 3 ) Blake Stal ion Area. Each station area, as previously noted, will vary in density and use. Based on the Hopkins Station Area Plan, the 1'011o\ving density ranges and uses are suti`cstcd: • • • page J -7 CHAPTER 4 - L AND USE AND Di \ i i ,': ` i I Final Report City of Hopkins, MN Hopkins Station Area PIE � u mup M H ookim comprehen,,n page 4 -8 Shady Oak Station Area The proposed shady ()ak station would consist of a 18() -car bark -and- ride structure on 17th Avenue. Redevelopment is anticipated to occur in a mixed -use fashion and develop around the park - and -ride sites. Mixed uses would support the function of a park - and - ride facility and create a live work ensiro ninent. The Hopkins Station Area Plan calls for redevelopment to occur in the following manner: Type Shady Oak Station (s q. ft) Main Floor Commerical 102,406 Main Floor Live /Work 23,664 Upper Floor Commercial 53,032 Residential Units (177 Units at 1,000 s . ft. /unit) 177,000 Total Est. Built Area (sq. ft) 361,152 Residential Sq. Ft. 177,000 Total Est. Built Area (sq.ft.) 361,152 Hopkins Downtown Station Area The niised - use category is intended to serve the proposed do\vnto «-n LRI' station at tith Avenur. In this area, the City envisions higher den - sity residential Nvith offices to create alive /work environment. Retail development a, xvith redevelopment should he limited to sth .venue, with the majority of retail located along \lainstreet. • • • • The Hopkins Station Area Plan calls for redevelopment to occur in the following manner: CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Type Hopkins Downtown Station (sq. ft Main Floor Commerical 39,200 Main Floor Live /Work 30,580 Upper Floor Commercial - Residential Units (177 1,000 sq. ft. /unit) 200,000 Total Est. Built Area (sq. ft.) 269,780 The Blake Station Area The primary focus of this area is to provide higher density uses near and around the proposed LRT station. Desired uses include a mix of high density housing with retail commercial and offices. The Hopkins Station Area Plan calls for redevelopment to occur in the following manner: Type Blake Station (sq. ft) Main Floor Commerical 64,000 Second Floor Office 32,000 Residential Units (194 1,000 sq. ft./unity) 194,000 Total Est. Built Area (sq. ft.) 290,000 Business Park The business park category accommodates stand -alone office and of- fice service uses. Business park areas may include such uses as office - showrooms, research and development facilities, real estate offices or banks. Industrial Industrial uses are largely located near the rail lines that run through Hopkins comprehenside plan page 4 -9 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DI \ I Hopkins. In most rags, these areas arc I'tllly developed. Uses include manufacturing, Nyarehousing or distribution centers. Institutional Hie institutional category is untended to c apt tire public and semi- public uses. These uses would include schools, churches, cite hall and other CIVIC uses. Open Space The open space categorN is intended f()r arras to he preserved f <nr natural resources or future park opportunities. Park These arc areas that have been developed finr recreational opportunities or amenities; facilities that ollcr active living opportunities. Private Open Space 0 The private open space category include: private uses, such as the Meado wbrook Golf C Curse and (.)al: Ridge Golf Course. Wetland The Wetlands depicted in the land use plan are derived from the Hen- nepin County \Vetland Inventory. The inventnry provides three classes of'wetlands: ( 1 ) wetlands with little or no drainage apparent (2) wet- lands in most rases, partially drained basins and ( 3) wetlands that could potentially he wetlands but need to he field verified. The wetlands that are shown on the planned land use map have been field verified. 'The wetlands depicted arc frn refi•rrncr purposes only. Planning Districts N part ol'the comprehensive planning update process, eight planning districts have been established (see Planning District 'Maps). Eaeh Kopkim comprehet,sn ,_: district was defined based on geographical boundaries, transportation �� page 4-10 • corridors and known planning initiatives. The intent of the district ap- proach is to allow the establishment of a specific framework for each geographic area. Each planning district embraces the land use goals set forth in this docu- ment. Each district has been analyzed, and plans have been formulated based on the specific uses and opportunities within the boundaries of the district, as well as assessing its relationship to adjacent planning districts. Planning District #1- North Hopkins North Hopkins land use patterns are well established and not likely to change over the next 20 to 30 years. The majority of this area is comprised of larger single- family residential lots and the Oak Ridge County Club (golf course). Commercial and high density housing is located along Highway 7 as are the Hopkins School District administra- tive offices and Eisenhower Elementary School. • Residential lots in Planning District #1 are the largest in Hopkins. The Bellgrove neighborhood is located just north of the golf course. This neighborhood offers larger homes and provides opportunities for move -up buyers. In addition, Bellgrove is adjacent to the Miimehaha Creek Preserve, which offers recreational uses. There are no anticipated land use changes in Planning District #1. If redevelopment were to occur, it would most likely happen through rede- velopment initiatives along theTH 7 corridor. Low - density residential uses will remain unchanged. The Mimiehaha Creek Preserve will remain as Open Space and continue to provide passive recreational uses. is CHAPTER 4 - LAND U A DEVELOPMENT Hopkins comf rehensivc plan page 4 -11 HAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND I)! ', 1 c I • 01 Hoer r,s Figure 4.3: Planning District # 1 Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: No changes are beino proposed at this time. Planning District #2 - Central Hopkins 1'he bulk of Hopkins single family homes can he Iotlnd in the Central I fopkins Planning District. A significant portion of' these homes were constructed in the 1900s and contribute to the unique character of Hopkins' housing stock; however, housing constructed during this era is reaching a point \N here maintenance issues are becollihig a concern. The Housing Plan addresses this issue calling for ongoing maintenance and private reinycstment. In the future, Planning District #2 needs to lie protected from outside intrusions that might threaten the integrit\ of the existing lo\v density neighborhoods. Potential intrusions are most likely to occur on the common boundary between Planning District #S and Planning District #?. Shady ( -)ak Road loans the western boundary of Planning District #?. The City has been collaborating with the City of Minnetonka and Hen - ffO ksris comj2reheiw\ : ' . page a -12 u 1 nepin County to address numerous safety, mobility and access issues associated with the corridor. Out of those discussions a preferred alignment has been recommended, and the reconstruction of the roadway is currently scheduled for 2013. Corridor improvements and land use changes identified in corridor planning efforts to date are not expected to negatively impact the single family homes located in Planning District #2, with the exception of the homes acquired as part of the road project. Figure 4.4: Planning District: #2 • Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: No changes are being proposed at this time. Planning District #3 — East of US Highway 169 Planning District #3 is bounded by three major transportation cor- ridors: TH 169, TH 7 and Excelsior Boulevard. Geographically, the district is one of the smallest, but contains a mix of uses including business park, industrial, low density residential, medium density resi- dential and high density residential. Although this district is compact, the existing uses are largely compatible since appropriate transitional uses and buffering exist. CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT fl Opkim comprehensive plan page 4 -13 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DI \ i I • Challenges lacinu Planning District #3 include a narrow strip of land along Jackson Street, just north of' Excelsior Boulevard. This land, guided as Business Park, may see enhanced redevelopment potential duc to the recent development of the Cargill office complex imme- diately to the west; however, the size and width of the site Dresent &N - clopment challenges Located just east of Jac kson Street is property guided for Business Park. In the unlikely event that this site is proposed for redevelopment in the future, attention should be given to ensure that appropriate buffering can enhance the intcgnty ofthe residential neighborhoods to the north. Long -term, the presence of LRT mad enhance the redc\clopnnent Potential of this property. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: • Reguide the ABM site from industrial to Low Density Residential Reguide parcels located east of the Cargill site and west of Jackson ,dye. from Industrial to Business Park. 0 Hopkims comrwehensk c page 4-14 • • Figure 4.6 - Planning District: #3 Planning District #4 - Blake Road Corridor Blake Road is a major north -south arterial on the eastern edge of Hop- kins. It provides connectivity betweenTH 7 and Excelsior Boulevard. The intersection at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard serves as a gateway into the community. Recent initiatives have examined the future of the corridor considering land use, transportation, safety and design. The City has begun to address several of these concerns through various plans. Planning documents addressing this area include: • Blake Road Corridor Community Assessment • Blake Road Streetscape Concept • East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study • Hopkins Station Area Plan CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT fl opkim comprehensive �)lan page a -15 m ! Ma Ay Farmdal Rd dy ,d a S O I L �,. m c g F� m AStN 2r t g s 2 i Plannng District 13 4F Industrial ,. Qty Boundary -9 Goll Course Pemels dr Open Space Low Density Residential dF Perk Cl) dr Median Density Reedealal dr Trail t,. Jt 01 Q y High Density Residerdiel if Public/ Insi utwnal '9UN,Ba Commerdel 4F Railroad dip Mixed Use p Nbtlend CO 4 Business Park 0 01 1 Figure 4.6 - Planning District: #3 Planning District #4 - Blake Road Corridor Blake Road is a major north -south arterial on the eastern edge of Hop- kins. It provides connectivity betweenTH 7 and Excelsior Boulevard. The intersection at Blake Road and Excelsior Boulevard serves as a gateway into the community. Recent initiatives have examined the future of the corridor considering land use, transportation, safety and design. The City has begun to address several of these concerns through various plans. Planning documents addressing this area include: • Blake Road Corridor Community Assessment • Blake Road Streetscape Concept • East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study • Hopkins Station Area Plan CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT fl opkim comprehensive �)lan page a -15 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE A \D Di \ i ; . ' i l to ki J comprehentin � : page 4-16 • Blake Road cur contains a mix of us,s similar to those f'onmd in Plannin` District #3. Challenges tacing this district today include a collection of structures that Nvere built between the 1 9SOs and 1970s that need icuprowinents and a corridor that is facing safety, mobility and access issues. In turn, there is a unique opportunity to revitalize the corridor by implenientinti the reconiinendations found in the plan nin(j documents referenced previously. The most significant planning opportunity from a land use perspective is the proposed LRT station. The station is proposed to he located south of 2nd St NE and -vest of Blake Road. LRI' is a catal st for redevelopment and is scheduled for 201 S. Cur- rent land uses near the L Rf site consist of industrial and commercial uses. Some of the current industrial buildinus east of Blake Road are no loner oPeratin` and are for sale or vacant. Sites located north of Excelsior Boulevard are (juided for Mixed -Else and land located to the east is (juidcd for Business Park. Land loo atcd west of Blake Road and north of Excelsior Boulevard has been addressccl in the East Hopkins Land Use and ;Market Study, adopted by the Citv Cuun( it in july ( A ' 2003. The studv that portion ol'this area arc to be rcdcvcloped. This redeNclopment is reflected in the future land use plan as mixed -use; however, the East Hopkins Land Else and Market Study should continue to be used to determine future land use patterns in this area. New residential uses located in the Plannin(y district would he associ- ated with mixed -use development,'. A viable mixed -use option may typically include hi`h density housin` above retail uses or uses may be separated in a horizontal configuration. Single family housing located within the plannin(i district is su`mtiested to remain in Place consistent with the housinu tioals defined in this plan; however, it should be noted that the Cotta Nci located east of the northern portion of'Blake Road (aces a number of challciwes. The nei diborhood contains pockets of dctcrioratino housin Thcre might also be an opportunity to pro\idc better connectivity with Minncha}ia Creek and provide additional recreational opportunities for residents. Renumal of sonic existinu structures in this area uvould increase the visibility and viability ol'Cottauc\ ill, Park, which is prescntl undcrutilizcd. Planninu charts 1 <u the Cotta, Park area will need to continue as the Cite continucS its focus on improvcnients aloe() the Blake Road Corridor. . • U • Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: • Reguide the Baker Square, McCoy's and 43 Hoops sites from Industrial and Commercial to Mixed -Use. • Reguide the Atlas site from Industrial to Mixed -Use. • Reguide the Rainbow and Kunz Oil site from Industrial to Busi- ness Park. • Reguide land located west of Blake Road, north of Excelsior Boulevard and south of the railroad tracks from Industrial and Commercial to Mixed -Use. • Reguide a strip of commercial to mixed use on the west side of Blake Road (North of 2nd St NE & South of Lake St NE). 1 -A h x L2nd& i x Planning District ae .F Industrial Cdy8oundery Golf Course Pi df Open Space t Low Density Residensal + Paw V Medium Density Residential 4P Trail -'—'--"— "-- '-- -- --- --- =-" 1r High Density Residertiel AV Public /institutional !:? Commerdal * Redroad i Q Mixed Use r V*Vand Business Pak Y Figure 4.6 • Planning District: #4 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE A DE Hopkim comprehensive elan page 4 -17 CHAPTER 4 - LAt\D USE A \D Df \ I r , r`'1 • 1 0 Planning District #5 — East Hopkins file majority of the district consists of low-density residential along with the Presence of significant institutional uses. One of the fecal points of the district is The Blake `chool. To the east of the school is the Interlachen neighborhood and to the «vest, the Presidents neighbor- hood. Each is a neighborhood of strong single family residential units, and existing uses Nvill continue to he supported in the land use Plan. It is highl unlikely that the land use pattern in Planning District #5 «•ill change over the nest 20- 30 Fears. It is expected that property owners will continue their etl'()rts to address ongoing maintenance needs along «ith i nore substantial renoNations and additions. Summary of Planned Land Use Changes: No changes are being proposed at this time. C Ft �;: Hera n,er n.. � Flannl Drstnsi a =. irrnustrur , Drty Baunanry GMr Ccuse 3 Ps- ry�r, crrnr.ry E a rm Dell ly R-d., re _ � d r B I Metlrem ;lenvil� R n r I Trad rru .,re it � rge Detrty Res. enlral f vtArc n rrurrona - � CI mrmrcu * Rai�roa� s S, ¢ A i.r r„ranrl li r fiusmcss PaM1 e 9 .N v Figure 4.7 - Planning District: #5 H opkims comprehend page 4 -18 0 _ .......e. C Ft �;: Hera n,er n.. � Flannl Drstnsi a =. irrnustrur , Drty Baunanry GMr Ccuse 3 Ps- ry�r, crrnr.ry E a rm Dell ly R-d., re _ � d r B I Metlrem ;lenvil� R n r I Trad rru .,re it � rge Detrty Res. enlral f vtArc n rrurrona - � CI mrmrcu * Rai�roa� s S, ¢ A i.r r„ranrl li r fiusmcss PaM1 e 9 .N v Figure 4.7 - Planning District: #5 H opkims comprehend page 4 -18 0 • Planning District #6 - South Hopkins The southern portion of Hopkins consists of mainly residential uses. A concentration of medium density housing borders both sides of 11th Avenue South. There is a significant stock of single family homes located in the Peaceful Valley and Park Valley neighborhoods. These neighbor- hoods are well established and have been developed in the 1950s. This planning district has a strong residential core; however, it also in- cludes some commercial, office and industrial uses. In some respects, these uses have spilled over from the industrial core that makes up Plan- ning District #7. The impact of these uses on residential properties has not been an issue due to the scale of the buildings and buffering between uses. The residential neighborhoods in District #6 will continue to be important assets to the community. District #6 is the home of the largest vacant parcel of land in Hopkins. The landfill site may have future development potential, but it is highly constrained by a number of environmental issues. At the present time the site has not been cleared by State agencies for any type of use. As a result, the property is fully fenced and it contains a methane collection system. Because of the magnitude of environmental issues on the landfill site, it is not expected to develop within the timeframe of this Compre- hensive Plan without financial assistance from other partners. The future land use plan presents no changes in this district. When the land fill site is developed, it will require a significant public investment that would warrant a public purpose for its future use. As part of the Comprehensive Plan update, it is recommended that this site remain as open space. • CHAPTER 4 - LAN US E AND DEVELOPMENT H opkins coin�)rehensive flan page 4 -19 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND D! 1 1 1 i Summary of Proposed Land Use Changes: • N draw cs are being proposed at this time. R 3 511 SI S fill, SIS 6Ih SI 5 6(h SIS _ Im SIS 3 , "rh 1 161 • • H o 1Cim comprehensi% P age 4 -20 ��P �Gn, 6ou an (ipl 1. ua Mncil, F ,iai * ar AM Figure 4.3 - Planning District: #6 Planning District #7 - Industrial l'he industrial uses located in Planning District #7 make up a si(11111 i- cant portion of the employment base in Hopkins. tiuper \'alu, which is Hopkins' lar,`rst rmplo�cr, has lacilitics scattered across this district. It is important to maintain the industrial land use pattern in this area to maintain a wide -rank of jobs. It is not anticipated that anv of these uses will change over the next 20 to 30 years. fhe lon'i - ran`e continuation of these uses is encouraged as are public and private reinvestments needed to keep the area viable. L_� C: • Proposed Land Use Changes: • No changes are being proposed at this time. Figure 4.9 - Planning District: #7 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Planning District #8 - Downtown Hopkins The foundation of Downtown Hopkins has been well established for many years. The core of downtown is primarily focused along Main - streetbetween 7th Avenue North and 12th Avenue North. The down- town district also extends west of 7th Avenue North and is comprised of a mixture of commercial and residential uses. The downtown core is also comprised of commercial and residential uses with a strong presence of civic uses (City Hall, Post Office & Hopkins Center for the Arts). In addition, a variety of restaurants, a movie theater and specialty stores are located throughout the downtown. KOpkim comprehensive flan page a -11 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE A \D D! \ , i I I l opki 5 comprehensn _ page 4-22 At this time, there are no land use changes proposed for downtown; how- ever, redevelopment may present mixed -use opportunities. In recent years, downtown Hopkins has seen a number of significant mixed -use redevelopments. Marketplace Lofts on the east end of Mainstreet pro- vides commercial uses on the street level with residential units above. Future redevelopment within the core of downtown will be encouraged to continue this pattern. Mixed -use redevelopment may also be prompted by the proposed Downtown Station Area located just south of downtown. When LRT becomes available, there will be a desire to redevelop within the vicin- ity of the station. The station area plan calls for redevelopment along Excelsior Boulevard, at the intersection of 8th Avenue and up 8th Avenue to Mainstreet. At this location, the intent is to create a live/ work environment and provide retail development that is compatible and supportive of the downtown. hn Planning District #8, there is also an opportunity to capitalize on underutilized properties. The EBCO site located at the intersection of' i Excelsior Boulevard and TH 169 could redevelop in a manner that is compatible with the existing business park to the northeast while taking advantage of the proximity to the downtown LRT station. Areas around all of Hopkins' proposed LRT stations are expected to develop in a mixed -use fashion. The form and function of the various mixed -use areas N aries between stations. As noted in the land use plan, the mixed -use category has been established to reflect the land use pat- terns intended for each station. The mixed -use located at the Shady Oak Station has also been included in the planning district. The idea of including both stations within one planning district is to help facilitate coordinated land use patterns. It is important to understand their role and proximity to one another. The purpose of the Shady Oak station is to serve as a live /work environ- ment, but on a different scale than the downtown. Redevelopment in this area would likely occur in a business park form, with the inclusion of residential uses. The mixed -use development may also include some commercial uses. Commercial uses would be sized to serve only the needs of the business park and park - and -ride facility. 9 Overall, Planning District #8 is expected to see the most significant change over the next 20 to 30 years as a result of redevelopment and the implementation of light rail transit. The Comprehensive Plan supports and recognizes these potential land use changes. Changes in this area, however, will need to continue to be compatible with the character and function of downtown. The following chapter provides additional guidance on how to maintain and enhance the character and identity of downtown Hopkins. Summary of Proposed Land Use Changes: • Reguide the EBCO site from Industrial to Business Park • Reguide the Tech Center and Napco site from Industrial to Mixed Use. • Reguide portions of land north at the intersection of Excelsior Boulevard and 8th Avenue S to Mixed Use. Figure 4.10 - Planning District: #8 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Hobkim .o rehensive Ilan P °8e J -T3 CHAPTER 4 - L AND USE AM) Di I: i • Land Use Implementation Actions Hopkins' Land Use plan identifies strategies and approaches to hell, meet the identified land use goals �lhich include: • :Maintain a viable downtown commercial cure. • 'Maintain a strong employment base. • Continue to emphasize compatible land uses between adjacent Jurisdictions. Maintain appropriate transitions between land uses. • lake advantage of redevelopment opportunities to capture futw Light Rail Transit (I.RT) initiatives. • Continue to coordinate land use and transportation needs. The goals listed above and the implementation actions that follow are intended to ensure long - term land use patterns, maintain a vi able do« ntow n, provide opportunities for ncv, etnployinent, capture redeNelopment opportunities and pro\ide a nniX of uses that keeps the community viable and competitive. Residential Land Use Patterns The Cite regards the preservation and protection of its existing resi- dential ncighborhoods as one of its most important priorities. Tlic CAN will work to protect land use patterns that continue to support single lamily homes. • A balanced supply of housing is important to Hopkins' efforts to servc the needs of a broad range of residents. The land use plan identifies land use patterns that will support a varietv of residential uses unc medium to high densite uses, such as condos, townhonics and apartments. In order to address residential land use patterns, Hopkins \� ill: • Work to protect the integrity and long -tern viability of' its low - density residential neighborhoods and strive to reduce the potential negative effects ofnearb\ commercial or industrial land through zoning, site plan reviews, and code enforcement. • Ensure that the infilling of vacant parcels and the rehabilitation of exi�,tin`` developed land will lie in accordance with uses specified • H 0 kim comprehensn , page 4-14 • in the Comprehensive Plan. • Ensure that incompatible land uses will be improved or removed where possible and the land reused in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. • Work to assure strong and well - maintained neighborhoods. • Work to enhance a variety of residential land uses in the City. • Work to balance the supply of multiple family residential uses within the City. Downtown Land Use Patterns Hopkins' identity and character is largely defined by the downtown district. It provides a sense of place for residents and is a center for commerce and government. The land use plan takes the adjacent land use patterns into consideration to protect the integrity and long -term viability of downtown. The City will work to ensure that land use pat- terns do not develop in a manner that would jeopardize downtown's economic viability or character. 0 In order to address downtown land uses, Hopkins will: Continue to leverage private investment in the redevelopment of the Downtown through judicious use of tax increment financing revenues and local capital improvement funds. Work with Downtown landowners and merchants to improve parking, access, and appearance. Maintain its compact form in order to concentrate business activities and to protect adjacent residential areas. Expansion of the commercial area will generally be limited to areas that do not displace single family housing. Industry and Business Land Use Patterns Hopkins has established a diversified base of employment including a number of major employers supplemented by a diverse mix of smaller businesses and industries. Today, the only opportunity that industries and businesses have to build or relocate is through redevelopment initiatives. Accordingly, the future land use plan has focused on cur- rent land uses that are not being utilized to their fullest potential. In some cases, these properties have been reguided to advocate a more appropriate land use pattern. • CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND D E V EL O PMENT KOpkim comprehensive plan page a -15 Summit Condominiums Excelsior Crossings CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE AND DI i • 10 addreSs industry and business land use,, Hopkins will: • Continue to actively promote the development and redevelop- ment ol' it, industrial areas throu`h marketing and public rela- tions efforts, land use planning, and careful financial incentives, including tax increment financing. • Strive to leverage its valuable locational assets and create indus- trial area, that have attractive buildino and urowxl , concealed outdoor storage, high floor -area ratioS, and high levels ofemplo`- ment, eSpecially employment in the professional and technical job area,. • Carefully ,tudv the implication. f()r commercial redevelopment of the pending reconstruction, "idenin,, and realignment of' Shadv Oak Road. Rcdeyclopment cfG its for the area Seek to create ne%y c ommercial Site. that appeal tot lie local market, have sale and comcnicnt access and parking, and have a high level of landscaping and site improvements. • Participate in the redevelopment of deteriorated and /or obso- lescent industrial and commercial areas when public financing is determined to be feasible and necessary. • Expansion of industrial zoning Nvill be considered only in cases where it can cleark be demonstrated that changes Nvill not have a detrimental effect on nearby residential properties. • Set and enforce high Standards for all non - residential design. Site plans for commercial and industrial facilities Nyill be carefully rcvkcNvcd for proper building orientation, parking placement, access, traffic impacts, pedestrian improvement., landscaping, Scrcenmg of storage, and general architectural appearance. • When ccunmercial property abuts residential property (espe- cially a( roSS a Street), extensive landscaping, fencing and /or berms should be used to mitigate impacts on the housing. Solar and Access Protection ,Metropolitan cities in Minnesota are required to include an element for protection and development of access to direct sunlight for Solar energy systems in the Update. A Solar access protection element is included in the Update to assure the availability of direct Sunlight to Solar ener`ry systems. Solar cncrgv i an alternative means to energy. HoPkim comprehensn< page a-?6 • It has less adverse impact on natural resources than fossil fuel. Currently fossil fuels and nuclear power are used to heat or cool homes and businesses, as well as for most types of transportation. Increasing the use of solar energy would decrease reliance on fossil fuels and nuclear power. The purpose for including this section of the Update is to ensure that direct access to sunlight for solar panels in not subjected to shading from nearby trees, buildings or other structures. Solar Access Protection Goal and Policies Goals: Encourage the use of solar energy systems for the purposes of space heating and cooling and hot water heating in new residential developments. is Policies: • The City will review its Zoning Ordinance and consider appropriate amendments to exempt active solar energy systems from lot coverage and setback provisions. • The City will review its Code and consider appropriate amendments to require swimming pools be heated using solar or some other form of renewable energy resource, where possible. • Within Planned Unit Developments, the City will consider varying setback requirements in residential zoning districts as a means of protecting solar access. Aggregate Resources Protection The Council's aggregate resources inventory does not indicate the presence of aggregate resources available for mining in Hopkins. Because the City is fully developed and has no aggregate resources available for mining, it does not need to address this matter in its Update. • CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE A ND DEVELOPMENT ! opkim com�rehensive Ilan page 4 -27 CHAPTER 4 - LAND USE .AND DI I Hopkim com , rehensi N page 4 -28 Historic Preservation 1'he City of Hopkins has no sites that are on the State or National Historic Rc, ,)i,ter. • • 0 • r Downtown Hopkins has changed substantially over the past 20 years. Noteworthy improvements include construction of the Hopkins Center for the Arts and the Hopkins 6 movie theater complex. These two developments have dramatically changed the visual appearance of the downtown core, and they bring substantial numbers of visitors into the community. Additionally, the east end of Mainstreet is seeing significant mixed -use development involving retail uses and housing. The Marketplace Lofts project was significant since it was the first to establish contemporary urban -form housing in downtown Hopkins. Other similar projects are expected in the future. Analysis of Downtown Hopkins Future improvements in downtown Hopkins will seek to capitalize on the assets of the area while working to address identified liabilities. The following is an overview of each: Assets • Downtown Hopkins presents a strong sense of place. It is the quintessential downtown that many suburban communities are trying to duplicate today. • Downtown serves as a significant shopping destination. • There is a strong base of existing establishments including special purpose retailers and auto dealers who draw people from outside of the immediate Hopkins area. • There is a strong local employment base that draws people to the city. • There is strong community support for the continued improve- ment of downtown. • The business community is service oriented. • Downtown Hopkins cuts across a broad range of lifestyle and income groups. • Local residents are supportive of local business establishments. • The City government is active in community, development. CHAPTER S - DOWNTOWN HOPK l Hold m comprehensive plan page S -1 Introduction Movie Theater and Restaurant Development Completed in 1997 CHAPTER 5 - DowNTOWN HOP6.1 .` Liabilities • The district lacks a critical mass of store types and sizes. • Downtown Hopkins does not operate as a unified business district. • Shopping activity is not ahvays continuous aloe, \lainstrect and, therefore, can be per( ei\ed as lacking the continuity to support a strong pedestrian environment. • Downtown faces simnificant retail competition in surrounding Communities. Recent public and private projects in downtown Hopkins have strength - ened the area's assets and improved issues that have been identified as past liabilities. The strong employment base in Hopkins and surround - ing office development has always served as a means to attract people into the downtown area. The private and public theater developments bring substantial numbers of visitors unto the central business district, expanding the base of customers for local businesses. r hl recent tears, ether improvements have also served to help further unily the business district. New retail construction on the east end Is of Nlainstrect and renovations of old buildings have allowed business expansions as well as opportunities for new retail and service busi- nesses. The success of recent developments in downtown Hopkins has caused an increase in the need for additional parkin`. With cve nts in the Hop- kins ( I'Or the .arts and Friday and Saturday evening crowds at the nun is theaters, parkinu is in short supply. Overflow parkin, frown these events could impact the .urrounding neighborhood areas. Monitoring and Assessing Based on past marketing �tudics, current conditions, and on`oin` strategic plannin j initiatives, the Ic,llow general recommendations are oticred for dowrntow Hopkins: • Dewlopmcnt efforts should he tar,eted toward encourauinu `row th and expansion ofcommercial establishinents that address two market orientations: 0 ) the destination specialty market, �_ and (2) the local convenience and specialty market. Hopkins H N opkim comprehens„ page i -1 • Center for the Arts helps make Hopkins a true destination. Specialty commercial uses can capitalize on the draw and the success of the arts and entertainment components of downtown Hopkins. • Assess the market's perception of downtown Hopkins. Deter- mine types of businesses needed and identify sites for appropriate new businesses. • Foster communication between the City, Hopkins Business and Civic Association (HBCA), and owners and managers of com- mercial properties. • Attract specialty retail and destination uses including arts, en- tertainment, recreation, antiques, hobbies and crafts, gifts and family- oriented uses. • Encourage the adoption of uniform downtown store hours and consistent management to improve customer service. • Encourage commercial development to be clustered close to the central core of the business district where it reinforces and is consistent with existing establishment types. • As funding is available, offer financial incentives to retain and attract commercial businesses. • Initiate a comprehensive review of long -term parking needs and formulate a plan to address those needs. Attempt alternative solutions to employee parking problems. • Build upon the area's strong sense of place, and improve the surrounding market area's awareness of the community. • Expand joint advertising and promotions for the businesses in the district. Promote Mainstreet via special events. • Adopt design guidelines for the areas of Mainstreet from Shady Oak Road to 12th Avenue and 7th Avenue to the east. Physical Plan Downtown Hopkins is planned to continue its tight -knit pattern of commercial development along either side of Mainstreet. Commercial activity is targeted in the vicinity of, but not limited to, the five- block- long core area from 7th to 12th Avenues. CHAPTER S - DOWN HO The Comprehensive Plan envisions that the present pattern of com- mercial, residential, and public land uses will be largely continued. ii__, Ho kim comprehensive Ilan page S -3 Hopkins Center for the Arts CHAPTEP, S - DOWNTOWN Hoi .x • Longer term, the construction of the Southwest LRT line through Hopkins will create new opportunities and could eventually change the dynamics of dowutow Long -term changes to land uses along 8th avenue could better connect Mainstreet to the IRE additional information on the potential impacts of LKI' is found in the land use chapter of this plan. Urban Design Guidelines Kopkim comprehemn page i -4 The follmving guidelines will be used by the Citv in reviewing new development and redevelopment. The oycrall intention is to maintain the appearance and character of the historic buildings throughout the commercial area, both in the historic core and in the supportive nearby areas. Buildings • Buildings should be constructed at a scale consistent with the historic downtown. • Building heights in the historic core should match those of' ad- jacent structures, with two or three stories being the desired height in that area. • ;Maintain as much building line along Mainstreet as practical. Where hui dings must be setback, a strongly landscaped edge should be established to maintain some visual line along the <trcet. • a window line should be maintained in the building facades along Mainstreet. • all commere ial puddings along Mainstreet should have rear en- tries designed to he attractive, functional, and identifiable. • All building entries, front and rear, should make provision for the protection ofusers from the elements by overhangs, recessed Born waN and /or awnings. • New buildings aloe` Mainstreet should attempt to imitate the window proportions acid placement established in the Downtown O\erlav District. • Exterior building colors along Maiustreet should be in the red- brown spectrum so as to be consistent with those of the historic core. LI • Parking • The City should continue to monitor and assess the Downtown Parking Plan. The Parking Plan should be utilized whenever development or redevelopment occurs and its recommendations should be continuously pursued. • Parking lots should be kept small and close to the businesses served. Larger parking lots should have visual breaks of four - season landscaping treatments. • Parking areas directly abutting the rear of commercial buildings should be paved and landscaped. These spaces should be reserved for customers and not occupied by employees. Emphasis should be placed on easy and pleasant customer use in all seasons. • All parking lots should have perimeter landscaping consisting of trees and shrubs selected to withstand the harsh conditions. • All parking lots must be paved with asphalt or concrete and properly maintained, striped, and landscaped. • Wherever possible, east -west rear alleys should align with one another so that circulation parallel to Mainstreet is promoted. • The exterior design of any new parking ramps should be support- ive of the appearance of the Downtown Design Overlay District. No parking ramp should be allowed to abut Mainstreet. Identity • Downtown Hopkins will continue to be identified through entry monuments, street lighting, and street landscaping. • Continue to emphasize the link between the eastern and western portions of Mainstreet. The focus in the western area should be on the expansion of traditional downtown businesses and on improving the appearance of existing automotive repair service businesses. • CHAPTER 5 - DoWNTOWN HoPKINS K Opk1.m comprehensive plan page S -5 Future Parking Needs May Require Construction of an Additional Parking Ramp CHAPTER 5 - DoWNTOWN Homi it H Ef r1i Industrial Parcels Golf Course Low Density Residential Open Space Medium Density Residential Jr Park dlF High Density Residential Ist St N co 0 • • 3rd St City Boundary Industrial Parcels Golf Course Low Density Residential Open Space Medium Density Residential Jr Park dlF High Density Residential Trail Commercial Public / Institution Mixed Use 4F Railroad Business Park Wetland Figure S.1 - Downtown Area Land Use Plan H opkifi,s c omnrehensnc, 1� page 1-6 Il 0 Introduction Overview Hopkins is a well established, complete community with a traditional downtown area and neighborhoods containing a variety of housing types. Although many people think of downtown Hopkins when they think of the City, the residential neighborhoods are a strong contributor to the overall character of the community. Hopkins' neighborhoods contain housing that ranges from traditional single- family homes on smaller, narrow lots to larger, more expansive homes on heavily wooded lots in excess of one acre. Multi - family housing consists of a variety of forms from townhouses to apartments to more contemporary loft units. In recent years, Hopkins has seen significant construction in downtown housing with the east end of Mainstreet becoming a strong is residential node. Although Hopkins is classified as a fully developed community, its housing stock will continue to evolve and change. Over the next 10 years (2020), the City of Hopkins is projected to add an additional 300 households with 200 more households expected by 2030. Most of this growth will occur as a result of redevelopment, both in and around the downtown area and on sites along some of the major roadways like Excelsior Boulevard, Shady Oak Road and Blake Road. Market Response to Housing in Hopkins Despite the aging of much of Hopkins' housing stock and the shortage in older units of some contemporary conveniences, houses historically have sold relatively quickly in Hopkins. In 2000 the Census reported a vacancy rate of approximately 2 percent for the entire community; however, the City is keenly aware that the size and design of many Post - War houses, combined with the physical deterioration that can occur in such units over time, can produce a downward spiral of conditions, values and market response. CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING Hopkins has a number of positive attributes that contribute to the de- sire to maintain properties and to expand and modify existing homes uu q_ Ho ksns comprehensive flan page 6 -1 CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING Hopkim comprehensn page 6 -2 • to meet more contemporar\ marketplace. needs. The City's location has convenient accessibility to major roads, transit routes and off road bicycle trails'; numerous job opportunities in the City and surround - in` area; cxcellent schools; and abundant social and cultural amenities contribute to keeping the housing market strong. Past comprehensive Flans have emphasized the need to keep Hopkins' housing marketable. This plan will continue to emphasize and expand upon this directive. Residential Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Program Hopkins has a long history of using loan and grant programs to further housing goals. hn response to the need to promote private reinvest- ment in the aging housing stock, the Cite has been administering a program of ( and loans to owner- occupants with lower incomes. For the past i 5 years, this program has assisted in the improvement of owr 3OO housing units in all parts of the Cite. The program is funded by the City's ,hare (A County administered Community Development Block Grant fluids. Hopkins has also fostered housing innovation. It pioneered hour- M ing improvement districts that required special legislation. Setting up the state's first housing improvement district allowed the city to implement major rnnproyements to a townhcnne development and two condominium developments in the westhrooke area, reversing a decline in housing quality and stabilizing the neighborhood as a clesir- able residential area. Development Standards are Supportive of Housing Choices 1he Hopkins Zoning ()rdinance has been continualh modified over the years to support and implement the housing initiatives identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 1'he current Zoning ( )rdinarrce includes five districts that allow detached housim, on parcels ranging in size from 6,1)(10 to 44,000 square beet. Five other districts allow attache d housing including duplevcS, Ic,ur -unit buildin( townhouses, and apartnnents at densities ranging from 3, 5,00 to 1 ,000 square feet of lot area per unit ( 12 to 43 dwc -Iling units per net acre). The R --f and R -5 districts allow for very urban densities with minimal amounts of open area. This type ofd evelopin cnt has proven popular in many eonnnnurnitieS throughout the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. 0 • • • Housing Construction Although the City is considered fully developed, over 400 new housing units have been built in Hopkins since 1990. Many of the new units have been created through redevelopment efforts including projects such as The Oaks of Mainstreet, Marketplace Lofts, Oakridge Place and The Summit. Other projects such as Marketplace & Main are poised to begin construction as soon as market conditions improve. The impact of these projects on the image of the City has been profound. Hopkins now offers the attraction of urban style housing choices within a compact, historical downtown area. This is exactly the type of environment that many suburban communities today are trying to emulate. In Hopkins, the fit of housing, jobs and the availability of goods and services occurs in a very genuine way. The community has a rich character that cannot be duplicated by new communities that are constructed at one point in time. Accordingly, Hopkins will remain a desirable location for the private marketplace to continue to seek opportunities for redevelop- ment that fit into the existing fabric of the community. A Guide for Future Housing Initiatives The housing section of the Hopkins Comprehensive Plan is intended to help guide the changes that lie ahead. It contains overall goals, an analysis of past trends, the identification of current issues, a plan for future housing, and strategies and implementation methods to guide future decisions. At its core, the housing plan focuses on two primary themes: 1) ongoing maintenance of existing housing and 2) opportuni- ties to add new housing as a part of future redevelopment efforts. CHAPTER 6 - Hol.lsING Hopkins comprehensive plan page 6 -3 Marketplace Lofts CHAPTER 6 - HoLlSING Goals A set of overall `gals provides a framework for housing initiatives in Hopkins. Pcrtainin` to housing, the Citv of Hopkins seeks to: Retain and enhance detached single - family homes. Hopkins has a high percentage of multi - family housing. Mostofthe housing constructed in the future will also be multi - family due to locational and economic considerations. The city will generally continue to protect existing single- family neighborhoods from redevelopment and undue encroachments to maintain a variety of housing types. Continue to emphasize housing maintenance. Much of Hopkins' single - family and multi- family housing is at least 40 years old. Due to the age of the structures, emphasizing ongoing maintenance will be critical to maintaining and enhancing real estate values and keeping neighborhoods desirable in the eyes of future home buyers. Take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to provide new housing choices for the community. Redevelopment has created exciting new housing opportunities in recent years and future projects will offer even more choices. Of particular note is the current plan to expand light rail transit to serve southwestern Twin Cities suburban communities. 'I he Southwest LRT line passes directly through Hopkins creating redevelopment opportunities at and around three potential station locations. Encourage the development of owner- occupied housing. Hopkins has a high percentage of rental housing. To maintain overall housing diversity, the city encourages new housing to be owner- occupied where feasible. Continue to strive for a mix of housing that accommodates a balance of all housing needs. The current supply of housing in Hopkins provides opportunities for people in all stages of the housing life - cycle. Hopkins' current housing stock also addresses a wide range of income levels. Entry level opportunities exist in the supply of rental housing; more affordable units are also available for first -time home buyers. Existing neighborhoods offer opportunities for move -up housing, and the needs of seniors are addressed in a number of subsidized and market rate housing choices. Support services for seniors in the form of assisted living and long -term care opportunities also exist in the community --_-,._,.,__Analysis ,.__. -Analysis of Housing Stock Household Characteristics • • H oo ki ng) The housing stock in the Citv of Hopkins is described by the follow - lto kng) comprehend, I page 6 -4 ing data from the 2000 U.S. Census Bureau. A household in Hopkins includes all the people who occupy a housing unit as their usual place of residence. The following household characteristics offer another perspective on the characteristics of people living in Hopkins: • 45 percent of Hopkins' households is family households (see Table 6.1). This compares with 58 percent for Hennepin County and 65 percent for the region. • The decrease in married couple homes may not be a true depic- tion of Hopkins since this decrease may be closely associated with the current housing stock. Single- family homes have not significantly decreased over the years. Instead there has been an increase in more contemporary loft style units. These units typically consist of non - family households and would influence the decrease in married couple homes. • Householders living alone increased by nearly 500 residents between 1990 and 2000. • 23 percent of all households include children under the age of 18 (see Table 6.2) compared to the region that has 34°% of such households. • 55 percent of Hopkins households is non - family households. This is significantly higher than Hennepin County (W , o) and the region (35 0 ,'o). Table 6.1- Household Type (1990 and 2000) 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 ®1990 ■ 2000 CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING page 6 -i Single Family Home Total households Family households Married - couple Nonfamily Householder living (families) family households alone CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING Housing Implications • The increase in householders living alone inay be indicative of a longer -tc rin pattern. If so, it will continue to support a market for multi- family, nnaller unit housing. • The pro ld'eration of households containing a smaller percentage of children under the age of 18 will have an impact on enrollment at local schools, and It may have an impact on the future sales of traditional single - family homes. Demographics Communities are continually evolving over time as residents age or more to c rther communities. understanding Hopkins' demographics can provide a telling story about future market needs. The 2000 Census shows a small increase in population since 1990 of about 4 percent (see T able 6.3). B� ?030 Hopkins is projected to add an additional 1,000 residents. • • Ko king comprehenst` c ; _. page 6 -6 Table 6.2 - Household Type - City /County /Region (2nno) • CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING Table 6.3 - Age 0 Table 6.4 - Age (2) Table 6.4 provides a breakdown of age groups in Hopkins. A typical trend for the region and the state is the aging Baby Boom generation. This age group, typically between 45 and 64, currently makes up 18 percent of Hopkins' population. As this age group continues to grow in size, it may pose several important questions for the community. Is Hopkim comprehensive plan page 6 -7 CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING Kobkin, comireheiw% page 6 -8 • there a ditcrsc housino stock to accommodate an aging population, and are there the necessary services (health services, medical lacilities and assisted living) to support the aging population Providing a diverse housing tc,ck not only gives residents a community to age in place, but options li>r all income levels. Demographic Implications • Changing dcmooraphfcs Nvill impact the existing housing stock. Onc -level homes will continue to be popular since they better accommodate the needs of an aoino population. • Existing and new housing will continue to need to offer choices for residents to age in place. • Hopkins and other agencies will continue to see a need for sup- port scrturs for the senior Population. • Sincc Hopkins is a fully developed community, redevelopment initiatives will be needed to accommodate the projected 1,000 additional residents by 2030. Housing Stock . Between 1999 and March 2000, 40 new housing units Nyere built in Hop- kins (sce'1 able b. 3). A significant number of new units have been created through land redevelopment over the last S years, including projects such as ( )akridge Place, Marketplace Lofts andThe Summit. The focus of the Community is now on housing maintenance and redevelopment of blighted and/or obsolete properties. Any new construction will likely occur on infill lots and through redevelopment. C7 17J Table 6.5 - Year Structure Built CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING is Overall, the single- family housing stock in Hopkins is in good condi- tion. In some cases, small concentrations of deteriorated multi- family housing exists. Although the older units located between Downtown and TH 7 and in South Hopkins need more ongoing maintenance due to age, there is apparent pride in ownership of these single- family structures, and they are generally well maintained. A large portion of Hopkins multifamily units were built in the 1970s (Table 6.6) and lead to concerns about deterioration and deferred maintenance issues. Proper maintenance of these units is a strong in- terest of the City. The City does have standards for the maintenance of rental housing that go beyond the Building Code. The provisions of the code require periodic inspections of rental units and repair of identified deficiencies. Housing Stock Implications • Efforts will need to focus on programs and initiatives that en- courage the maintenance of the existing aging housing stock. • Generally single- family and multifamily units constructed 40+ � O�Jk111e5 comprehensive plan H page 6 -9 2,500 00 0 N 2,000 ■ Own 0 Rent N rn 1,500 0 ° v o' 1,000 2 rn j 500 ry A Ln L N ry � M 0 1999 to 1995 to 1990 to 1980 to 1970 to 1960 to 1940 to 1939 or March 2000 1998 1994 1989 1979 1969 1959 earlier Year Built is Overall, the single- family housing stock in Hopkins is in good condi- tion. In some cases, small concentrations of deteriorated multi- family housing exists. Although the older units located between Downtown and TH 7 and in South Hopkins need more ongoing maintenance due to age, there is apparent pride in ownership of these single- family structures, and they are generally well maintained. A large portion of Hopkins multifamily units were built in the 1970s (Table 6.6) and lead to concerns about deterioration and deferred maintenance issues. Proper maintenance of these units is a strong in- terest of the City. The City does have standards for the maintenance of rental housing that go beyond the Building Code. The provisions of the code require periodic inspections of rental units and repair of identified deficiencies. Housing Stock Implications • Efforts will need to focus on programs and initiatives that en- courage the maintenance of the existing aging housing stock. • Generally single- family and multifamily units constructed 40+ � O�Jk111e5 comprehensive plan H page 6 -9 CHAP] ER 6 - HOUSING 7,000 6,000 0 5,000 0 0 N 4,000 O 75 3,000 a 0 2,000 1,000 0 C. gars a,O hcoin to approach an aoe were continual maintenance inlprovenlents are needed. The City may need to find creative \vas s to cncouraoc honlcomvners and landlords to conduct main- tenanceinlprovenlents. • The Cite Nvill need to continue to seek outside programs that assist in the maintenance and enhancement of the etistin` hous- ino stack. Tenure One of the unusual facts about the Hopkins housing stock is the high proportion of renter- occupied units compared to owner occupied units. Accordino to data from the 1()()() Census Bureau, 62 percent of the housing in Hopkins \N renter - occupied and 38 percent of the units was owner - occupied (see Table 6.6). Table 6.6 - Housing Type and Tenure (2000) • v M U, N V) n � O M u) M O M N 2 3 or 4 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 49 50 or Mobile Boat, RV, more home van, etc. ■ Own © Rent H opkim colnprehensi page 6 -10 The Census also reports the population Iivino in various Macs ofhousino. I'his data can be used to calculate the average number of people living in different hnusino types. 'Table 6.7 compares average population b\ housing tN1x and tenure (o« - n or rent). Ilk data provides some inter - estino observatx,ns about housina in Hopkins: • '111cre is a lame rental population; hoNvever, there is also a sitinili 1, 1, detached attached 17J n U �J cant amount of single- family homes that are owner occupied. Hopkins offers a diverse housing stock that allows residents to own single family -homes or rent multifamily units. • Structures with 3 to 49 units are primarily occupied by one and two person households. Table 6.7 - Population Per Housing Type and Tenure (2000) Household Income Income influences many aspects of a community. Income provides consumers the ability to acquire housing (own or rent) and purchase goods from local businesses. According to the 2000 Census, 27 percent of Hopkins' homeowners was spending more than 30 of their house- hold income on housing costs (see Table 6.8). This is 9 percent more than the Twin Cities average of 18 percent. 36 percent of Hopkins' renters was also spending more than 30 percent of their household income on housing costs. (see Table 6.9). CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING H o kim comprehensive l Ian page 6 -11 Tenure Implications • Hopkins will continue to have a large number of rental units, making turnover a potential issue. CHAPTER 6 - HoUSING Table 6.8 - Selected Housing Costs as % of Household Income (2000) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Lr44A Table 6.9 - Gross Rent as % of Household Income (2000) 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Less than 20% 20% to 29% ■ Hopkins 0 Hennepin County M Twin Cities SMSA 30% or more • 40 Ko king com�,rehensl% c _ page 6 -,2 38% 37% • Regardless of income spent on housing, the City of Hopkins has been relatively successful in retaining and attracting new residents. 42 percent of the population (age 5 and older) lived in the same house in 1995 (see Table 6.10). This compares with 52 percent for all of Hennepin County and 54 percent for the region. The census does not report the portion of the population that moved to a different house within Hopkins dur- ing this period. People moving to Hopkins from a different location in Hennepin County made up 28 percent of the 2000 population. This portion of the population is higher than the comparable segments of the County (22 percent) and regional (25 percent) populations. Hopkins' success in retaining residents is partially attributable to the supply of existing single - family homes. Rental units, however, have been a challenge for the City. There has been a high turnover rate of tenants in some rental units compared to the rest of the housing stock. This issue is a concern for the City, because it can influence a community on several levels. Fluctuations in school enrollment create educational challenges for the Hopkins School District. High turnover rates also . influence the overall well being of the community. Retaining residents creates a stronger sense of community and stronger cohesiveness. • CHAPTER 6 - HousING Hopkim comprehensive plan page 6 -13 Table 6.10 - Residence in 1995 - City /County /State CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING fi obkin,s comprehensn c , page 6 -14 Housing Income Implications • Based on current household incomes, portions of Hopkins' hou,inti i, affordable. • Hopkins will need to consider ways to accommodate future affordable housin` units to meet ?Metropolitan Council require- ments. • 1'11c City will need to work with other (joyernnnental and non- profit entities to help reduce the turnover rate of rental hous- inu • The Cite of Hopkins will need to continue collaborating Frith the I fopkins tichool District to assess the social, economic and educational implications of the overall housing supple. Home Buyers /Renters The opportunity 10r purchases by first -time homebuyers in Hopkins is enhanced by the supple of smaller, older home, in Central Hopkins and in other neighborhoods. Parts of the Presidential neiUllborhoods, Park `alley and Peacelitl Valley are also more affordable. Campbell, Hobby Acres and Interlachcn Park neighborhoods offer opportunities • for nioNe -up buyers. More expensive homes are available in the Bell - grove and Knollwood neighborhoods. The relatively larue number of rental apartments and townhouses also offer choices for households who do not wish to or cannot afford to purchase home,. is Housing and RedevelopmcntAuthority (HRA) owns and maintains 76 dNticlling units rented to lour- income households. All of the units are located in one building near Downtown. ()ther subsidized rental units are operated by coop, and non - profit agencies not directly at- filiated with the Cite. Overall, 12 percent of the total rental units in I lopkins is subsidized and 7 percent of the Cities total housinu stock is subsidized (exclusive of group home:). A small percentagc of low income indiN ideals in Hopkins receive rent assistance thruuph the lederal Section 8 Rent Assistance Program ad- ministered by the Metropolitan Housing and RedcyelopmentAuthority (HRA). The Cite of Hopkins currcntl\ has 350 households receiving rent Subsidies through the Section 8 Housing Program. Phis program, hMyeycr, does not fully meet the need for housing affordability in Hop- kins or elsewhere, and levels of fUndini have been reduced annualiv throughout the past two decades. Home Buyer /Renter Implications Changing market trends will continue to influence the Hopkins housing market. The City will need to continue offering and promoting hous- ing assistance programs to facilitate both home ownership and affordable rents. Housing Affordability Housing is considered affordable when it consumes no more than 30 percent of gross household income. Families spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing may have difficulty affording basic needs like food or clothing, or handling unanticipated medical or financial expenses. Affordability in the City of Hopkins is defined by the Metropolitan Council and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment (HUD). Based on the thresholds of these agencies, Hopkins and other metro area communities should focus on providing hous- ing that is affordable to families earning 60 percent of the Twin Cities median family income. Under HUD definitions this translates to a home priced at or below $152,000. At that price, a family of four who earns $47,100, which is 60 percent of the Twin Cities median family income of $78,500, is spending 30 percent or less of its gross income on home ownership. Rental housing is defined differently than home ownership. The thresh- old for rental housing is considered affordable to families earning 50 percent of theTwin Cities median family income. The rental threshold for affordable housing for a family of four is $39,250. This results in the following affordable rental rates: Efficiency Unit - $687 a month 1 Bedroom Unit - $736 a month 2 Bedroom Unit - $883 a month • 3 Bedroom Unit - $1,020 a month CHAPTER 6 - HousING 110 kins comprehensive flan page 6 -15 Town Terrace Apartments CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING • In response to affordable housing needs, the Hopkins Comprehensive Plan is required to acknowledge the communitv's share of the region's need for logy and moderate income housing. In January of 2006, the ;Metropolitan Council released a summary report entitled "Detc-rmin- ing the Affordable Housing Need in the'lWirn Cities 201 1- 2020." This report not only forecasted the regional need for newly- constructed, affordable housing ( 2020), but also allocated each connmunitv's share of the rctiional need lot the comprchensivc planning process.The total nerd for nr« lv- constructed affordable housing units in the - Ivvin Cities is estimated to be 51,000 betwcrn 2011 and 2020. Based on this report, the 'Metropolitan Council has forecasted a need of 143 new affordable units between 2011 and 2020 for the Citv of Hopkins. This number is determined based on a variety of factors Such as Io\N- -\vage jnb proximity, existing housing stock and transit services. T he lollowulg is a summary of these factors and the formula used by the Metropolitan Council: 2 Base allocation of the amount of the 300 new housing units v hic11 should he affordable ( same across the region Nvith minor adjust- ments). +66 Logy -wage Job Proximity: communities, such as Hopkins, with more logy -wa"e lobs than local lmv -wa( working residents have their share ncrcascd by a proportional annount (1.93 ratio). 9 Housing Mock: 43 percent of'l lopknns' housing Stock is con- sidered al lOrdable at 60 percent of median intone. tiince 30 percent is seen as desirable, the c v's share decreased by a proportional alu OU111. +14 I',-ansit tiervic Level 2 transit service available results in an increase of 20 percent to the community's share. 143 lotal New Affordable Units :Weeded It is important to note that the study was concerned only with newly- construe tcCI affordable housing or development actions that consume land. The stud\ recognin•s that a portion of low income households will find housing in older, market -rate units that have depreciated in price to maintain occupancy; however, these housing units are not l lopkim comf rehensn page 6 -16 included in determining the number of units needed. Since Hopkins is a fully developed community, it is assumed the 143 additional units will be achieved through redevelopment initiatives. These initiatives are discussed further in the Land Use chapter. Housing Plan Hopkins' Housing Plan identifies strategies and approaches to help meet the identified housing goals which include: • Retain and enhance detached single - family homes. • Continue to emphasize housing maintenance. • Take advantage of redevelopment opportunities to provide new housing choices for the community. • Maintain a housing supply that responds to changing demo- graphics. • Encourage the development of owner- occupied housing. • Continue to strive for a mix of housing that accommodates a balance of all housing needs. The goals listed above and the implementation actions that follow are intended to ensure long -term housing quality, meet Hopkins' share of the regional need for low and moderate income housing, preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods, promote housing redevelopment in appropriate areas and continue to provide a mix of housing types that keeps the community viable and competitive. Neighborhood Preservation The City regards the preservation and protection of its existing resi- dential neighborhoods as one of its most important actions; therefore, the City will work to protect the integrity and long -term viability of its neighborhoods and strive to reduce the potential negative impacts of nearby commercial or industrial land development through zoning, site plan reviews, and code enforcement. Long -term stability and growth of neighborhoods are key elements in Hopkins' efforts to remain a desirable place to live and to achieve long- term sustainability. Neighborhoods are more than attractive places to live. The residential sectors of Hopkins provide employees for busi- CHAPTER 6 - HouSING KOpkim comprehensive plan page 6 -17 CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING • nrssrs, a market for goods and services, and thev create an image of the community. 'Neighborhoods are also a reflection on the community's social and economic standards of living and overall quality of life. To address neighborhood preservation, Hopkins will: • Strictly cnforcc its municipal regulations pertaining to hous- ing and yard maintenance to protect the value and intcgritV of residential neighborhoods. • Support housing maintenance throtwh continued achninistration of applicable programs. • Continue to enforce it. maintenance code for nnlltiple- family housing and rental housing. • Protect residential areas adjacent to downtown Hopkins from the tundue encroachment ofnon- residential uses. • Promote the infilling of vacant parcels in and near residential neighborhoods. The redevelopment of existing developed land will be in accordance with uses specified in the C'omprehensiyc Plan. • Pursue efforts to remove land uses that are inconsistent with the C'omprehensixe Plan and incompatible with existing residential neighborhoods. • Fnforce high standards for all multiple - family residential de- velopinent. Factors to he considered in reyie« new housing proposals will include but not he limited to the aspects of build- i ng Inassino, parkink, locations, access, traffic impacts, landscap- ing, exterior architectural design, fencing, trash handling, and parking ratios. Housing Redevelopment Most of l lopkins new in housing will be attributable to rede- velopment. 46day, them are limited locations in the community where it may he appropriate to allow and encourage housing redevelopment. In these locations, the City has indicated its land use intentions through the Land U e Plan and the zoning regulations. In the hlture, however, the opport till ities fin additional housing naay be expanded. Fhe planned Southwest LR F line has the potential for significant change including creating additional potential locations for more housing or mixed - use development. Future improvements to ShadN Oak Road and possibly com�arehenv� Blake Road also have the potential to expand housing opportunities. Ko king � i c . ' . page 6 -I8 • In most cases, future housing construction is expected to be the out- come of private market actions. On a case -by -case basis, Hopkins will consider financial participation in housing redevelopment projects when projects provide demonstrable public benefits consistent with this Comprehensive Plan and city redevelopment policies. To address future redevelopment, Hopkins will: Focus on the implementation of short and long -term redevel- opment recommendations contained in the land use section of this plan. Remain open to the consideration of new housing types and designs that meet the broad spectrum of existing and future residents' needs. Work closely with Hennepin County and other agencies on the implementation of the Southwest LRT line. Housing Assistance • The City of Hopkins has a long history of providing housing assistance for low income, elderly and special needs residents. Due to the age of the City's housing stock, a significant number of rental and owner- occupied units are affordable. Accordingly, Hopkins will continue to provide housing assistance in a targeted manner. In order to provide housing assistance, the City will: Participate in the rent assistance programs of Hennepin County and the Twin Cities Metropolitan Housing Authority and serve as a local clearinghouse for information pertaining to rental assistance. Consider using a variety of means to upgrade existing housing to provide a fair share of rental housing for low and moderate income households. Tools may include revenue bonds, tax incre- ment financing, tax abatement and Community Development Block Grants along with other public funding sources as they may become available. The City will also consider partnerships with private and non- profit entities to improve the quality of existing housing and /or ensure that rents remain affordable. • CHAPTER 6 - HOUSING KoiDkim Coml reheiisive Ilan page 6 -19 CHAPTER 6 - HGUSING Housing Initiatives Kopkin(B comprebenS'I, C : page 6 -20 the City of Hopkins will pursue a series ofaction steps related to the maintenance ofstrong neighborhoods and the creation ofnexv housing through appropriate redevelopment eflorts. The following initiatives will he pursued: • Contlrllle and /or expand c-xisting housing programs. • Examine and improve housin(I maintenance codes and actively cnforcc these cede,. • 'Maintain and improve public infrastructure in neighborhoods. • 'Monitor the effectiveness of the Truth in Housing Prouram to ensure that it is helping to maintain and upgrade residential housing stock. • Fncouragc the use of rental rehabilitation and single- lannily housing loan programs offered by various private and public sources. • Continue to promote first -time home buyer programs offered by out,idc agencies. • Continue to promote and offer the Residential Rehabilitation Loam (;rant Program. • O )HtlnU all\' monitor the condition of existing housing units and idcnt tf` properties that have deteriorated to the point that they nnav need to be removed and replaced with new housing. • 1go`res enforce the Nuisunceabatement Ordinance /Hous- in;) Code in regard to dilapidated housing units. • C011611lle communication and outreach efforts with residents of multi- lamily housing including working with the HopkinsApurt- ment Managersa,sociation (HAMA) to ensure that multi - family housing residents are welcomed to the conimunitN. • Discourage the construction of additional assisted living facilities and long -term care facilities. Hopkins has an extensive supple of such uses, which places significant pressure on existing police and emergcncv medical response services. • Continue to coordinate redevelopment initiatives associated with the LRT stations. Additional iutl rmation on housin` programs and actions is included in the Implementation lice tine of' the Comprehensive Plan. • Introduction Hopkins is a fully developed community with an established park and open space system. From small parks like the ParkValley Playground to community parks like Central Park, public facilities offer diverse activi- ties for residents of all ages. Since there is very little vacant land left in Hopkins, any existing park expansions or new park sites will result from redevelopment activities. It is not likely that redevelopment activities will result in any significant expansion of the existing park system. Since park expansion and new park construction is not the focus of Hopkins' future park planning efforts, the emphasis will be placed on maintaining and enhancing the existing system. Part of the enhancement of the existing system will focus on expanding existing trail connections. Hopkins is a regional hub of recreational trails. In the future, it may be possible to expand local trails to provide better links to regional trails as well as to connect local park facilities and local points of interest. • CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, O PEN S PACE AND TRAILS KOpkiti coml rehensive plan page 7 -1 CHAPTER 7 - PARKS. OPEN SP \� ) I • Park, Open Space and Trail Goals A set of overall `oats provides a frameNvork for park and trail initia- tives in Hopkins. Pertainin` to parks and trails, the Citv of Hopkins seeks to: Continue to provide a park and recreation system that satisfies the needs of diverse population. Provide a park and recreation system that supports community identity and serves as a gathering space for community and neighborhood events. Provide local links to the regional trail system. Fstablish a trail system that interconnects the city and offers an alternative means of transportation. Emphasize maintenance and enhancement of existing parks. Continue to collaborate with the City of Minnetonka, the Hopkins School District, Three Rivers Park District and other agencies to provide recreational opportunities for Hopkins residents. • Utilize the park system to protect natural resources. Promote active living and a healthier community through parks and K opkdn,s comprehensn page 7 -2 recreational opportunities. Classification System Hopkins has a variety ofparks that are components ofthe overall park system. to examine existing parks and to project future park needs, a unifor classification system is used in this plan. The following categories have been established: Classification: Neighborhood Park Description: Neighborhood parks are the basic unit ol'the park sN and serve as the recreational focus of' neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks emphasize informal active and pas- sive recreation. Location Cnterio: ' , to ' 1 mile distance and uninterrupted by uon- rrsidrntial roads and other physical barriers. Sic Critcrio: Usually bctween i and 10 acres. • • • Classification: School -Park Description: Combining parks with school sites can fulfill the space re- quirements for other classes of parks such as neighborhood, community, sports complex and special use. Location Criteria: Determined by location of school district property. Size Criteria: Variable • Classification: Community Park Description: Serves a broader purpose than neighborhood parks. Focus is on meeting community -based recreational needs as well as preserving unique open space. Location Criteria: '/2 mile to 3 -mile distance and typically uninterrupted by non - residential roads and other physical barriers. De- termined by the quality and usability of the site. Size Criteria: Usually between 20 and 50 acres. • Classification: Special Use Park and Recreation Is Facilities Description: Special use park and recreation facilities may be privately or publicly owned. Private facilities can offer either indoor or outdoor recreation opportunities, usually on a member- ship or fee basis. Location Criteria: Variable, depends on specific use. Size Criteria: Variable • Classification: Natural Resource Areas Description: Lands set aside for preservation of significant natural resources, remnant landscapes, open space and visual aes- thetics. Location Criteria: Depends on resource availability and opportunity. Size Criteria: Variable CHAPTER 7 - PARRS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAI Parks and recreational facilities are typically utilized based on the dis- tance residents are willing to travel to access amenities. The location criteria set above provides general guidelines on the intended service areas a park should serve. Using these guidelines can provide a useful tool when analyzing the existing park system and determining areas that are underserved. Figure 7.1 provides a visual assessment of Hopkins park system and its service areas. Service areas have been mapped for Ho kim comprehensive Ilan page 7 -3 CHAPTER 7 - PARRS, OPEN SP\( i ---- Table 7.1 - Park System Inventory l 1pkines omprehensicomprehensn � page 7 -4 • 0 i b • • ^ 4 • H J y j i Yj • • N 4 /I L i J �i J J� `�'',�� Y • • • • • i J� yr • • • • • • �o /J / 7 /J i, i r� Jj x x x x x x d x y x x x i" d o o o "o o o o o " o] . ° G " T a. u u v � • � z z U z Z z z z z z U A L] z z N U N z U N �` � d v N T 4 y " > F C h N N U 0.�'. z Q o-4 a y o x x �� o o p x S Q r� � x 0. z U 6 Q � x w :2 o o • 0 • • Figure 7.1 - Service Area wo o CHAPTER 7 - PARRS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS 1 Alice Smith Elementary 2 Blake School 3 Buffer Park 4 Bumes Park 5 Central Park 6 Cottageville Park 7 Downtown Park Hopki comprehensive Man page 7 -5 i 4 tom. � e L54 Y4 N�k� jg4'R �t c� wo o CHAPTER 7 - PARRS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS 1 Alice Smith Elementary 2 Blake School 3 Buffer Park 4 Bumes Park 5 Central Park 6 Cottageville Park 7 Downtown Park Hopki comprehensive Man page 7 -5 CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, OPEN SPA( : . 1, [ I • neighborhood and community parks. Overall the service area analysis shows the City of Hopkins to be well served by its existing system. There are areas for improvement; however, these areas are not likely to see new park construction, unless they are through redevelopment initiatives. Facility Inventory Local recreational facilities are provided by a number of sources. Public parks are perhaps the most obvious of these sources; however, parks and recreational opportunities provided by other entities need to be considered in assessing the total park and recreation system. Other entities providing park and recreational opportunities in the Hopkins area include adjacent communities, schools and private facilities (see Table 7.1 - Park System Inventory). System Needs 0 A tool for analyzing a local park system is the application of a population ratio standard. This standard is expressed as a number of acres of park land per one thousand people and is used to provide a general guideline for the assessment of existing and future park needs. For the Hopkins Coinprehensive Plan, a standard of 7 acres of municipal park land per 1000 people has been used as a benclunark for planning purposes. This standard is consistent with a range of standards offered by the National Park and Recreation Association. Additionally, the overall standard has been broken down into the following components: Neighborhood Park 2 acres per 1000 people Community Park /Sports Complex —5 acres per 1000 people Standards have not been directly applied to the other classifications used in this plan including school parks, natural resource areas, trails, or private park and recreation facilities. Neighborhood and community park needs can be satisfied in combination with the development of school facilities provided that facilities are available to both groups. 'frail corridor., are very site specific and are not included in overall acreage NN calculations because they serve as links between various components Ho kim comprehenJN,__ page 7 -6 • • C HAPTER 7 - PARKS, O PEN S PACE AND TRAILS Hopkins comprehensive plan page 7 -7 Application of these standards yields the following results: CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, OPEN SI - o 1 i f 1 Lopkim comprehensn c page 7 -8 ofthe hark system. Private facilities are also not included in the overall standard because in mane cases, they do not have the same longevity enjoyed by public hark uses. Neighborhood Parks Standard: ? acres per 1000 people Comments: Neighborhood parks are recreational facilities that are in- tended to serve populations residing within a ' 4 - ' z mile radius of the site. "These facilities tvpically contain open space areas, which accom- modate uses such as field games, court games, play equipment and other uses. Although five acres is generally recognized as a minimum size for neighborhood parks, smaller tracts of land can be used due to natural conditions or in areas where larger land parcels are not available. Existing Supply / Need: Hopkins currently has ten sites that are catego- rized as neighborhood parks ranginu in size from .5 acres to 6 acres. Application of the recommended standard for neighborhood parks results in a deficiency of 12. 11 and 12.71 acres in 2020 and 2030 re- spectively. The standards indicate the need for additional neighborhood park areas; however, closer examination of Hopkins reveals that the City probably does not need to add park areas to .erve existing and future needs. Hopkins contains three public school sites that accommodate neighborhood hark needs. These sites along with Alder Park in Edina provide convenient access liar all residents. As shown in the service area analysis, almost every home in Hopkins is located within ' 2 mile of an existin`T ncigbb"rhood hark. The only exception is the extreme northern portion Ofthe community lvin` north ofthe Oak Ridge Golf Course. This area is completely developed, precluding the potential of adding an additional neighborhood park. 11' the golf course is ever redeveloped in the future, an additional hark site could be acquired at that time. Residents in this area do have the opportunity to access bike routes and local trails via Minnetonka Blvd. that provide access to other local facilities within the Citv of Minnetonka. Community Parks Standard: 5 acres per 1000 people Conuuents: Community parks are recreational facilities that serve as s F 11..E • c: focal points of community recreational systems. As such, they typically provide facilities that appeal to a broad spectrum of users. Activities may include athletic complexes, archery, fishing, nature study, hiking, picnicking and other uses. Community parks commonly contain facili- ties that are designed to appeal to both active and passive users within one park site. The location of community parks is usually established based on topography and other natural features and on accessibility via the local road network. Existing Supply /Need: Hopkins currently has five sites that are classified as community parks. They include Central Park, Maetzold Field, Shady Oak Beach, Steiner Park Preserve* and Valley Park. Central Park and Maetzold Field consist predominately of athletic field areas. Both of these sites are used intensively for adult and youth sports programs. Additionally, Central Park is the home of the Hopkins Pavilion that accommodates indoor ice hockey and indoor soccer. Steiner Park Preserve and Valley Park contain passive and natural areas in addition to active pursuits such as volleyball, basketball and archery. Shady Oak Beach, a facility run jointly with the City of Minnetonka, is an area that accommodates swimming, fishing, water oriented play areas and picnicking. Application of the standard for community parks shows the city meeting needs through the year 2020. A small increase of 0.37 acres in com- munity park land may be needed by 2030. Because of the developed nature of the community, adding community park land will be difficult; however, two future opportunities exist. The southern portion of Hopkins contains a landfill site that has been closed for a long time. At the present time the site has not been cleared by State agencies for any type of use. As a result, the property is fully fenced and it contains a methane collection system. At some point in the future, the property may become available for public use. When this occurs, the site could be developed as a community park. The second future opportunity involves the Minnehaha Creek Preserve Area that is owned by the City of Hopkins. If it becomes unnecessary to continue to use this property as a public works site, it could be incorporated as a new community park. At this time, the City has no plans to move the public works site. Overall the city is well served by community parks and should continue to meet future needs. * Steiner.Park Preserve has not been formally named. The property was donated by the Steiner family to the City of Hopkins. CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS Hopkins comprehensive plan ' page 7 -9 Shady Oak Beach CHAPTER 7 - PARRS, OPEN SI' \� , 1 ) l ' , Hopkim comlwhen , page 7 -1u Trails and Sidewalks Hopkins has a traditional pattern of deyelopment that mane suburban communities across the countrN today are tryimo to emulate. Established main street businesses, hiuh quality nei�hhorhoods, and an excellent park system are all linked by an efficient roadway network. phe C ity also has a stron` interest in makinu all of these area,, accessible by non - whicular mrans. Accordingly, the Parks, (_)pen Space and'frails section of the plan outlines appropriate locations for trails and sidewalks that accommodate pedestrians, bicycles and in -line skating activities. The purpose of the ;vstem is to accommodate recreational pursuits but also to allow people to have access to employment and retail centers without having to use motorized vehicles. Hopkins is a hub Cor the regional trail network. At the present time, the City is the location of the junction of the Lake Minnetonka LRL, North Cedar Lake, Ceder Lake and \1\' River Bluffs HU Rruional Trail. These trail se`incnts fidlow 27 miles of abandoned railroad beds stretching from Hopkins to Victoria and from Hopkins to Chanhassen. A portion of the trail \test of 11th Aye is surfaced with compacted crushed limestone. East ol' 1 1 th Ayr the trail is ten feet wide and pared asphalt. Grades along the trail are generally 5 percent or less, which makes them ideal for bikin,, tyalkin and runnino fhrec Rivers Park District operates the trail f(T sprin" sununer and fall usaue. Currently, the park and ride lot aloe` Excelsior Boulevard at tith Avenue and the Depot Coffee House are used as trailheads. In 2006 both trailhcads were improved and expanded. These re`ional trails lo a spine that passes through Hopkins, af- fordinu easy access to adjacent communities and more distant points of interest. _- ___ Connectivity Opportunities r The City has identified a trail plan that accommodates movement throutihout the community Providing numerous links to the recrional trail spine. Lhe system includes a network ol' sidewalks and off -road hike /hike trails (see f=igure 7.2: Park and Trail SN The system is shown on the map entitled Trail Plan. Bike Trail on Excelsior Boulevard 0 Other local trails will also be added as road reconstruction projects occur in the future or through other trail improvement initiatives. Some of these major corridor initiatives have been currently discussed in plans. The following summary is intended to help frame anticipated connectivity opportunities and serve as a guide to making trail con- nection decisions. Blake Road Corridor Blake Road serves as a major north -south route on the east end of town. In the past decade, traffic volumes have increased and have posed pedestrian safety issues for the high density neighborhoods to the north andThe Blake School to the south. At this time there are no scheduled improvements to address safety, access or mobility issues. The City will continue to coordinate with Hennepin County to ad- dress these issues. Connectivity opportunities may present themselves as redevelopment occurs in light of the proposed LRT station and other redevelopment initiatives. These redevelopment initiatives are discussed further in the Land Use Chapter. As a result of needed transportation improvements and possible re- development opportunities, numerous planning studies have been completed along the Blake Road corridor. Each study has taken into account at some level pedestrian and bicycle movement. The following planning documents can be used, in addition to the Comprehensive Plan, to evaluate connectivity opportunities and serve as a guide to planning decisions: • Blake Road Corridor Community Assessment • Blake Road Streetscape Concept • East Hopkins Land Use and Market Study • Hopkins Station Area Plan The Blake Road corridor will continue to be evaluated as pedestrian and bicycle connections present themselves. In addition to evaluating the corridor's needs, the City will continue to explore funding op- portunities to assist with pedestrian and bicycle improvements. For instance, in 2008 the City applied for a Hennepin CountyTOD grant to construct pedestrian -ways along Blake Road north of Excelsior Boulevard. CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS K Opkile5 comprehensive plan page 7 -11 The Depot Coffee House Excelsior Boulevard | ' Park e ark 2 Blake School 3 Buffer Park 4 Burnes Park 5 Central Park Park 6 ottagevil 7 C le Park 7 Downtown Park Eisenhower Elementary 9 Elmo Park 10 Harley Hopkins Park 11 Hiawatha Oaks 12 Hllftop 14 Maetzold Field 15 Minnehaha Creek Preserve 16 Oak Ridge Country Club 1 Oakes Park 8 O—pass Skate Park 19 Park Valley Playground 20 Shady Oak Beach .11 Shady Oak Nature Area St. LOOTS Park 22 Ste ner Park Preserve 23 Val:ey Park Wk Eclina City Boundary E—uIg 71 -It 9 Proposed Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail Extension P,.psed N Mile C,eek Regional T� EM—ion le Parcel N.ghb.iih..d Park Community Park Other Park Facilities Open Water neton Figure 7.2 Park Trail |.` ' P " « " 7-o 0 0 • Shady Oak Road Hopkins has been collaborating with the City of Minnetonka and Hen- nepin County to address safety, mobility and access issues along the cor- ridor. As part of these efforts a preferred roadway alignment has been proposed, along with a pedestrian and bicycle component. Roadway improvements may also provide the opportunity for redevelopment, which is discussed further in the Land Use chapter. Timing for road- way improvements is still being determined at this time. If and when roadway improvements occur and redevelopment opportunities present themselves, the appropriate pedestrian and bicycle components should be integrated. Excelsior Boulevard Hopkins has made significant reinvestments to the Excelsior Boulevard corridor. These investments have included boulevards, sidewalks, ad- dressing pedestrian safety issues, city beatification improvements and directional signs. hnprovements to the corridor can serve as a model for other pedestrian and bicycle improvements throughout the com- munity. Hopkins Station Area Plan The Hopkins Station Area Plan by the IBI Group was completed in October of 2007. The purpose of the study was to develop station area plans for the Shady Oak Road, Downtown and Blake Light Rail Transit (LRT) stations that provide the first elements of a road map to guide future integrated transportation and land use planning initiatives with the city. In addition, this report provides connectivity elements to each station plan. Connectivity improvements to the area will need to continue to coordinate with LRT initiatives. CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, O PEN SPACE AND TRAILS Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail The proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, which would travel east through Edina and Richfield and would connect with the MN River Bluffs Regional Trail and the Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail in Hopkins. Although a preferred regional trail alignment has not been master planned at this point,Three Rivers Park District has worked with the city and others to identify potential corridors in Hopkins. Kopkim comprehensive plan page 7 -13 CHAPTER 7 - PARRS, OPEN Si' .i 1 � 1 • Recently the Citv has been factlitatirlU improverucnts to the creeks corridor that Ivill address erosion issues, falling culverts and potential realignment ol'thr creek. Llforts to innpro\ c the creek have been jointIN discussed with the Three Rivers Park District. Imprownlents to the creel: will also inccn segments >f the proposed regional trail. Infrastructure improvements to the creek are anticipated to occur in the fall of ?008, with trail work to follow in 2009. Collaboration efl()rts will continue between the appropriate agencies to incorporate the proposed regional trail and creek corridor improvr- Ill ent". Lake Minnetonka LRT Extension The proposed Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail extension is in- tended to provide better connectivity to the northern portion of the North Cedar Lake Re A current connection can be made I) using existing �idc« alks, but is not conducive to hikers. The proposed alignnnent Nvould Ii 41mv �Iainstreet \'ashington :l� enue North and con- nect with the North Cedar Lake RetiionaLTrail via 2nd Street NE. Acconlnlodation of bicvcle nlovenneut along the route would require on street bike lanes. The Citv has no plans at this time to inteuratc hi- cNrlc lanes along this route, but will continue to coordinate with'I'lu Rivers Park District to address tilture regional connections in this part Of the conllnunity. Connecting thr Lake :Minnetonka LRf Regional Trail with the 'NIN Regional Bluffs LRY and the Ceder Lake LRY Regional'hrail may also present itself along Sth .Acme youth. Inl prove nlents to Sth venue South would likely occur in conjunction with redevelopment initiatives associated with the proposed Downtown LRT station. This connection clay not be as direct as the proposed extension, but would provide a link bctwecn the two regional trails. Emerging Trends Hopkins clenu>graphics are c hanging with an aging habN boons popula- tion and growing ethnic populations. Regardless of age or ethuicities, there is a stronger desire todav to be active; however, with changing demographics, recreational needs and the perception ofrecreational uses H l lopkim comprehensn c page 7 -IJ • have changed as well. In light of these changes, recent studies have begun to highlight future desires for recreational needs. One study in particular done by the University of Minnesota's Design Center for American Urban Landscape, titled "People and Urban Green Areas: Perception and Use (June 2003)" begins to highlight some of these emerging trends. These emerging trends are as follows: Emerging Trends • Green space that provides activity for teenagers. • Seniors are more conscious of a healthier lifestyle and are seek- ing recreational amenities. • Large gathering areas for cultural celebrations. • More flexibility with fields to allow for diverse range of games (lacrosse, soccer, rugby, ultimate frisbee, cricket, etc.). • Community gardens • The need for ball fields is declining. • Desire for more corridor - oriented amenities, such as paths and trails. In addition to these emerging trends, there has been a stronger need to promote active and healthier communities. These initiatives are associated with numerous health concerns and have attracted national attention. One in particular has been the rise in obesity, which has been associated with heart disease and diabetes. Providing recreational opportunities and amenities can help promote a healthier and more active community. This park plan has identified many of the assets Hopkins has to offer for its residents to live an active lifestyle. In Hopkins' case, the system is well built and residents are well served by its local parks and its trail access to the regional system. As improvements are made and park recommendations are considered, there needs to be an ongoing emphasis on providing for an active and healthier community. • CHAPTER 7 - PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS l opkin,i coin , rehensive plan page 7 -1i CHAPTER 7 - PA RKS, OPEN SI'A( i �, , 1 • Park and Trail Plan llOPkineS comprehenm\ page 7 -16 Based on the analysis information presented previously, input from the public and the Hopkins Park Board and considering the directions provided by the goals that are contained in the plan, the following rec- onuncndations are offered: Dexelop the landfill site and /or the Minnehalia Creek Preserve area as community barks ifthe opportunity presents itself. Both of these sites have the potential to serve as community park areas. If the landfill bec� unc, available for public use, it could accommodate needed so ccer fields and other active facilities. Should the Preserve area become available, it could he used for a combination of both passive and acti\e pursuits. The area adjacent to the creek could he used passively for trails and natural habitat. Other areas of the site could accommodate active facilities such as soccer lields. The Cite should prepare master plans for both of these potential park sites in order to identilw appropriate uses. ?. Work to establish a ,cries of local trails that connect to the re- fb gional trail,. Incorporate trails as part of all major road improve- ment projects such as tihadv Oak Road, Blake Road and Fxcelsior Boulevard. Examine higher volume local roadways for potential off street trail installation. Upgrade and improve all hark buildings to ensure ADA acccssibil- itv. - F. Coordinate improvements for the Shadv Oak Nature Area in con- junction with the pending roadway improvements. Examine the feasibility of installing a trail around all or portions of the pond area. 5. Evaluate the use of open fields, hall field, and outdoor hockev rink, to determine opportunities for flexible uses, such as soccer and lacrosse. 6. hnprmc lighting and ,idcxvalk, to make areas more pedestrian friendly. 7. Continue to coordinate with the Three Rivers Park District to pro - vide re trail connection, via Nine Mile Creek and the Lake Minnetonka I RT Fxtcn,u n. Overpass Skate Park (Highway 169 and Excelsior Boulevard) Transportation Issues The transportation network of Hopkins, like the land development pattern, is established and has few opportunities for major restructur- ing. The planned Southwest Transitway light -rail (LRT) line planned in 2015 represents one significant change. This LRT line will run within the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA) regional trail right -of -way through the center of the community. Three LRT stations are planned in Hopkins; one at the east end near the Blake Road/ 2nd Street NE intersection; one near downtown just south of Excelsior Blvd at 8th Avenue; and the third on the west end near Shady Oak Road between the 16th and 17th Avenue alignments and one block south of Excelsior Boulevard. See attached Hopkins Station Area Plan Final Report, October 2007. Reference 11 th Avenue South - Southwest Transitway Crossing Study, August 2007. Issues • Identify transportation issues and required mitigation actions related to LRT stations and the associated redevelopment. This would be done through additional station area planning efforts and the development of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. • What will be the impact of the proposed reconstruction of Shady Oak Road? • What unexpected impact on local streets, if any, will be caused by the new Cargill corporate campus? • Several roadways, such as Highway 169, Excelsior Boulevard, and Highway 7, divide the community. What can be done to reduce the divisive effect of those roadways? • What should be the City's role and response in reducing conges- tion on the metropolitan highway system? • CHAPTLR S - TRANSPORTATION HOPKOPE1 comprehene plan siv E118 8 -1 CHAPTER 8 - TRA\'SPORTATIO\ Transportation Plan Hopkins coml)rehenY\ L . I.. page 8 -2 • The planned svStcm c,fmajor roads in Hopkins is illustrated on the'Iranspor tat ion Svstems Plan along with the lijht rail transit route and station site being identi- fied by the I lenucpin County Re`ional Railroad Autllority (see Figure 8. 1 ). No major chan`res to the road svStem are planned for Hopkins with the exception of the reconstruction and upgrading of Shady Oak Road by Hennepin County. Transportation Systems Plan Traffic count forecasts and number of existing and proposed lanes of principal arterials and A- Minor Reliever roadways are Shown below. Table 8.I - Improvements Road MN TH 7 Class Principal Arterial # oftanes Existing 4 Proposed 4 Traffic Counts/Forecast Current 30,500 ,I 32,000 US 169 Principal Arterial 4 4 92,000 98,700 CSAH 3 A -Minor Reliever 4 4 25,400 22,900 CSAH 61 A -Minor Reliever 2 4 11,300 13,700 CSAH 73 A -Minor Reliever 2/4 2/4 11,200 12,000 CSAH 5 A -Minor Reliever 2 2 10,200 1 11,200 The forecasted traffic volumes are taken from the December 2(1(18 update to the Hennepin Countv 2000 Transportation SYstems Plan (see Fi`ure 8.2).These foreca,tS take into account future Hennepin County road improvement project., inrludin` a projected 201 3- 2014 improvement to CSAH 61 from Excelsior Buulcvard (CtiAH 3) to A1N TH 7 that will expand this roadway from 2 -lane to 4 -lane. the forecast volumes also consider construction of the Southwest Transitwav and a rc`ion -wide aSSUmption that transit trips will double by year ) WO. This coutrtbutrs to the projected volume reduction on CSAH 3. Being a fully developed connuunity, it is reasonable to use the Hennepin Countvl'SP model Iralfic forecaSt,. 0 There are several roadways within Hopkins that currently experience capacity or safety prohlcmS. The HS Hi`hwav 169 and CSAH 61 both experience capac- itv pr "lhlems inrludin` severe contiestion during (lie P'N2 peak hour. The CSAH 61 problems should he relieved with the proposed expansion from 2 to -f lanes and realitinment of tlic !NINTH 7 intersection to be clone with the 2013 - 1014 0 CHAPTER 8 - TRANSP ORTATION Figure 8.1- Transportation System Plan MINNETONKA M I NNEHAHA © ---- —l_- B. N. S. F Imo' 8 I I I I I 1 . S.. F I U Ion m CREEK ! `1 a z � o W J MEE . S.. F I m CREEK ! � a z � o W J z 1 1 I - - - --- I 1 1 g E L - --- - ---- z - I M 1 I / m I I I y. Trw Fr. G • I 't I - � I f rESrr� (� � E - _ 1 ' CREEK I� I, &ETMM 1 AD. MINNETONKA < z A W THE CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY G�OG� w rw ST. LOUIS PARK M . e . SA S. Lj uNC fi 1 Fl. F 1 ! _ G• P• I ?4 4 I < R a I y I O I E: EDINA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLAN ROADWAY SYSTEM /MEY COl1OIL FORMATI PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL- - - - - A MINOR RELIEVER- - - - - - B MINOR ----- .- - -_. MAJOR COLLECTOR - - - - - COLLECTOR- - - - - - - _ LOCAL - - - - - - - - - - PRIVATE ROAD- - - - - - - - -- - CITY LRATS - - - - - - - - _ LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEM LRT RARE - - - - - - - - LRT STATOM - - - - - - - - , Uu0ote01 i -IS -2009 RVM If opkim com�)rehensive Rl In page 8 -3 CHAPTER S - TRANSPORTATI()\ Figure 8.2 - Traffic Volumes 2008 DRAFT TRAFFIC VOLUMES YDMOIPAI.ITT OF HO KNNFBOTA DUA61lIHl O F T%ANe01rrAT[ON amu M e1 • - DADEP� OF TEANSPOWATION RID®AL EEEDIAT M@iRRtlfM 2008 W E LEGEND .. C d MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET SYSTEM LEGEND H opkim comprehens .1 page 8-4 • 40 Hennepin County reconstruction project. Hopkins is participating along with ()thee corridor aakcholdrr, in a US' Highway 169 Corriclor Stuck that is looking at ways to c()11strurt modcrately priced improi to help relieve conges- tion. Howcyer, current budget constraints rccluce the likelihood of constructin` near -term projects of the scope necessary to improve capacity and relieve coiwestion. The CSAH ?W.NI1 TH 7 intersection Is at LOS E or F for several rilmements during the P.N1 peak hour. additionally, the crash rate for the intersection is twice the aycragr crash rate for Similar intersections. INInDOF is planning a )009 impro\ement project to modify intersection geometries and revise the signal system to reduce collisions. This prnjrct will improve the pedestrian trawl \ya\ acrossl H 7 by eliminating the free right turn lane and frontage road El connection to CSAH 20. However, the safety improvement will also negatively affect intersection capacity for NB to EB right turns - vehicle queues extending south of the intersection on CSAH 20 to and beyond Cambridge Street will persist. Roadway System Policies • The City will continue to design and maintain its roads and review site plans according to the functional classification system of roads illus- trated by the Transportation Systems Plan in order that they serve the needs of the community and enhance regional efforts to reduce traffic congestion. • The City will monitor whether excessive non -local traffic uses residential streets and, if so, explore means to minimize it. • When Hennepin County widens Shady Oak Road, the City will work with the County and the adjacent landowners to ensure that there remain adequate landscaped setbacks along its edge. • The City will ensure there is adequate multi -modal connectivity at future LRT stations. • The City will consider alternative methods of Raiding road improve- ments, as State legislation allows, to maintain its roadways and also to improve its financial readiness to support necessary Hennepin County road improvement projects. Travel Demand Management Policies Travel demand management (TDM) aims to increase the number and propor- tion of people who share rides and who travel outside of rush hours. These techniques are expected of communities in the metropolitan area served by congested portions of the metropolitan highway system and of cities that have regional business concentrations, both of which include Hopkins. It has been proven to be far more cost - effective to promote TDM and transit than to try to build more highway lanes. • Hopkins will continue to review the site plans of major new business de- velopments to ensure that they contain provisions for preferential parking for ride - sharing vehicles and consider zoning code changes incorporating TDM incentives and goals for large business redevelopments. • Hopkins has a mixture of low -and high- density housing and industrial and office businesses which may help reduce travel on the metropolitan highway system by allowing people to live near their place of work. The CHAPTER 8 - TRANSPORTATION Hopkins comprehensive plan page 8 -S CHAPTER 8 - TRANSPORTATION Hopkims comL)rehena page 8 -6 Land Use Plan continues that pattern. Hopkins will support the Minnesota Department of Yransportation and the 'Metropolitan Council efforts regarding ongo- ing educational programs to encourage ride - sharing, staggered Nvork hours, and off -peak travel. 'Stich campaigns can he most effectivch mountrd at the metropolitan level. Transit Policies EffectiVC use oftransit, Which is defined as all forms ofridin` together, can make a significant difference in the level of congestion in certain corridors. Hopkins is currently scrved by Metro Transit regular bus routes (see figure S. 3), a - )6 -car 'SIN / D( )T park - and -ride lot along Excelsior Boulevard, de 0 Figure 8.3 - Bus Map • mand responsive service for the elderly and disabled through Metro Mobility and Hopkins Hop -A -Ride, and the Minnesota Rideshare carpooling program. The Hennepin County Regional RailroadAuthority (HCRRA) and Metropolitan Council are planning to build a SouthwestTransitway new transit route through Hopkins with three stations within the community. This new transit corridor is currently in the draft Environmental Impact Statement development process with either enhanced bus or light rail as transit options. Hennepin County in conjunction with the partner cities along this new transitway are working to get this project recognized as a needed and justified near -term transit improvement and listed as a "Tier I" initiative in the Metropolitan Council's Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). Hopkins is committed to fostering an environment supportive of transit and ridesharing because it recognizes the benefits that good access can have on economic development and general quality of life in this community, not to mention the fuel savings and reduced air emissions. Regular Route Transit • The City, through its representatives, will continue to actively participate in the planning and design of the proposed 2015 Southwest Transitway. As of January 2009, the project is in the project planning phase of the project development process outlined by FTA for major transit initiatives. The DEIS scoping summary report is scheduled to be considered for approval by the HCRRA Board on January 27, 2009. The DEIS scope includes four light rail alignment options, an enhanced bus alternative and a no -build option. It is anticipated that the locally preferred alternative will be selected by May 2009. The DEIS is scheduled to be completed by January 2010. • The City supports the proposed locations for light rail transit stations in Hopkins. Should a light rail transit option be chosen, the City will continue to work with the HCRRA on station planning and design. The station locations are shown on the Transportation System Plan on page 8.3. • Hopkins will plan LRT stations and transit- oriented developments to ensure an excellent pedestrian environment within 1/2 mile of the stations. The City will publicize the accessibility of the LRT stations in the com- munity to promote the use of this new travel mode and also to make the general public more aware of the convenient access to the central city. C' CHAPTER 8 - TRANSPORTATION Kopkin8 comprehensive plan page 8 -7 CHAPTER S - TRANSPORTATIO\ Kop com� page 8 -8 C] • The City will attempt to maximize the connectivity between the pro- posed downtown LRT station and the central business district, including pedestrian, bicycle and shuttle bus access. • The City Will strive to ensure that parkin` demands at LRT stations do not ne`atiy impact surrounding residential or business areas. Metro Transit Bus Service • I'he City has worked with the ,Nletro'Transit to create new or improved bus waiting stations alons its routes fl Hopkins, especially alon15 Excelsior Boulevard and in the Downtown. • The City will review major new developments for the inclusion of bus shelters and pullouts it'such sites are along 1NTTC bus routes. • The City will ensure that there is wood public transit service and LKI_- feeder bus c(unectiyity at each LRT station. • Hopkins is «ithin the Nteti District, Market Area II. tier\ ice options for 'Market area II include reuular - route locals, all - day expresses, snnall vehicle circulators, special needs paratransit (ADA, seniors), and rideshanng. Demand - Responsive Service l'he City will continue to do what it can to facilitate :Metro Mobility- and Hop- kins Hop -A -Ride. Bicyclist and Pedestrian Policies Note: Bicycle and pedestrian trail information is also found in the Parks, Open Space and'frails section of this plan. • The City gill attempt to retain The Depot facility as a re; trailhead facility or develop new traillnead facilities near the confluence of the re`ional trails, as required with the implementation of the Southwest Transit«ay LRT. • 1'he City will continue to build pedestrian ways alum its collector and certain minor arterial streets to improve accessibility and pedestrian travel safety between residential areas, doyyntown, parks and the regional trails. • Ilopkins will strive to create excellent Pedestrian environments in and around its I'ttture LRT stations and'FOD areas. • I Iopkins will endeavor, in the near -term, to secure funding for and im- prove the adequacy and safety of pedestrian accommodations aloe` the • Blake Road corridor from Excelsior Boulevard to Highway 7. The City will continue to ensure the safest possible conditions at regional trail street crossing locations. The City will support the Three Rivers Park District in its plan to con- struct the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail that would run from the MN River Bluffs LRT RegionalTrail at 11th Avenue, south along 11th Avenue through Valley Park and southeasterly into Edina and Richfield. The City will improve pedestrian and bicycle accessibility between the regional trails and the Hopkins central business district. Aviation There are no existing or planned aviation facilities within Hopkins, however, the City recognizes that it has a responsibility to include airspace protection in its Update. The protection is for potential hazards to air navigation including electronic interference. Hopkins does not plan and its ordinances do not permit structures of 200 feet or more. Hopkins will notify MnDOT and the FAA us- ing the FAA Form 7460 -1 "Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration" if it receives any development proposals for structures of 200 feet or taller. 2030 Met Council Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Table 8.2 - Met Council TAZ Data • TAZ Population 2010 2020 2030 Households 2010 1 2020 2030 1 Employment 2010 2020 2030 527 239 242 242 103 1 105 105 300 300 300 565 691 691 691 300 300 300 120 120 120 566 1- 1 147 1 147 499 499 499 554 554 554 567 4,395 4,420 4 436 2,271 2 2,296 3,755 3,814 3,888 568 1 402 1 399 1 395 521 521 521 159 160 161 569 2 994 3 653 3 958 1,532 1 1 3 41 5 788 570 - - - - - - 3 751 3 776 3 791 571 4,310 4 4 2 2 2 118 1 312 1 1 312 572 1,368 1,368 1 592 592 602 62 77 77 573 637 664 664 265 288 288 59 59 59 574 717 706 706 299 289 289 80 90 100 575 - - - - - - - - - 610 - - - - 90 100 150 613 1 - - - - - - - Total 17,900 18 600 18 900 8 8 9 13 600 14 800 16 300 CHAPTER 8 - TRANSPORTATION H OJA4165 comprehensive plan page 8 -9 CHAPTFR 8 - TRANSR)RTATIUN Figure 8.4 - Hopkins Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ)* Hopkins 614 568 S E 569 573 , 567 O P K I 571 572 527 EDI 524 528 SOURCE: The geography for the TAZ's m Miles are based on the Twin Cities Regional o 00a) 01 0.2 Travel Demand Forecast Model. Local Roads are from The Lawrence Group's Street Centerline data. Community Boundary, Stream, and Open Water 1148 TAZ Identification Number -- -- - -- Community Boundary are from DataFinder.org TAZ Boundary Stream Some users describe TAZ's as Traffic Analysis Zones or some other closely Local Roads Open Water related words. In principle, they refer to similar transportation planning areas. N It Metropolitan Council Community Development October 23, 2007 Hopkins .12rehensl page 8 -l0 • is • • Introduction Purpose The City of Hopkins (City) has developed this Water Resources Management Plan (WRMP) to meet regulatory requirements, and to plan for future alterations in the existing drainage system due to redevelopment activities. The City is within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD). The MCWD is in the process of updating its Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, and the NMCWD updated its Water Management Plan in 2006. Minnesota Rules Part 8410.0160 states: • Each local plan must, at a minimum, meet the requirements for local plans in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.23 S, except as provided by the Watershed Management Organization Plan under Part 8410.0110, Subpart 3. • Each community should consider including its local water re- sources management plan as a chapter of its local comprehensive plan. Each local plan shall be adopted within two pears of the board's approval of the last organization plan that affects local units of government. The City of Hopkins will continue to work to ensure the City's Goals and Policies and Development Standards are consistent with both Watershed Districts as the Plans and Rules are revised. The City is completely developed with a mix of commercial, in- dustrial, residential and open space uses. Redevelopment activities within the City are also occurring as the population of surrounding area continues to grow. 0 CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN H opkin,s comprehensive pla1� page 9 -1 CHAPrER 9 - W.%rER RESOI R i , MANAGEh1ENT PLAN Land Use Location The City of Hopkins hcs in southeast Hennepin County. The Citv contain, 2,760 acres ol'land and water resources within its corporate boundaries, and i, hounded by the cities of 'Minnetonka, Edina, and St. Louis Parl: . Existing Land Use The existin, land use ol the Cite consists of a mix of industrial, com- ulercial, residential, open space, and transportation corridors. Please see Fi`ure 4.1 for the existin` land use of the City. A northern and eastern portion ofthe Cite drains to Nlimrehaha Creek, while the snuthern portion of the City drains to Nine :Mile Creek, both throunh natural drairra; and via storm sewer. Future Land Use As previously stated, the City of Hopkins is completely developed. - he future land use as defined in the updated Comprehensive Plan is shown in Fitiure 4.?. '11tc future land use chances will be a result of redcvclopmrnt activities. Future redevelopment activities should not have a si`mficant impact on regional storm water systems. Additional Land Use Control Shoreland The City of I Iopkins has not adopted a shoreland ordinance. At this time, the :'Minnesota Department of Natural Re,ources ( .N1NDNR) does not require a shoreland ordinance, and we do not see the need to implement one in the near future. Floodplain Flit! City participates in the National Flood Insurance Proaraut (N FIP). 1 he Cite administer, a floodplain ordinance based upon the effective Flood Insurance Studv (FIS) for the City of Hopkins (dated June 16, 1992). There are two flooding sources (Minnehaha Creek and Nine :Mile Creek) sho\yn in the FIS. A request for a Letter of:llap Revision (LOINIR) has been submitted to the Federal Emer`encv Manacyement H N opkim comf rehens„ T page 9 -1 Agency (FEMA) for consideration. This LOMR is for a correction of an inconsistency found in the floodway version of the HEC -2 computer model that had been furnished by the MNDNR in August 1994. The roadway overflow section at 9thAvenue South had not been encroached to be consistent with the floodway width downstream and upstream of the crossing. This correction requires that a `corrected duplicate model' be prepared and approved by FEMA. Hydrologic Setting Regional Climate The climatology of Minnesota is described in the United States Geo- logical Survey (USGS) Water - Supply Paper 2375 as follows: Minnesota is affected by a variety of air masses. In winter, the weather is dominated by cold, dry, and polar continental air masses from north- western Canada. In summer, the weather is dominated by dry, tropical continental air masses from the desert southwest or by warm, moist, tropical maritime air masses from the Gulf of Mexico. In spring and fall, the weather is transitional and is affected by alternating intrusions from these three air masses. Almost 45 percent (about 12 inches) of Minnesota's annual precipita- tion is received from June through August, When moisture from the Gulf of Mexico is most available. Only 8 percent of the annual pre- cipitation is received from December through February. Cyclonic and convective storms are the two major types of storms that bring moisture into Minnesota. Cyclonic storms are large- scale, low- pressure systems associated with frontal systems that approach the State from the northwest or southwest. Cyclonic storms that ap- proach from the northwest are common in winter and produce small quantities of precipitation. Cyclonic storms that approach from the southwest occur in the fall, winter, and spring and can bring substantial quantities of rain or snow by drawing moisture northward from the Gulf of Mexico. Cyclonic storms in combination with unstable conditions can produce severe weather and excessive precipitation. In late spring and summer, thunderstorms are common. These small - scale convective storms typically form because of the presence of unstable, warm, tropical air near the surface and colder air above. CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN 'H0Qkt118 comprehensive plait page 9 -i CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESM k( I M, %NA(iE%IE \T PLAN l Hold c5 .o )rehensn c page 9 -4 Floods in ?Minnesota are of two forms lar,,c -scale floods in late winter and early sprin`, and shall -scale flash floods in late sprinu and sunnner. I ar c -scaly floods gcnerally result from a combination of deep, late winter snowpack, frozen soil that prevents infiltration, rapid snownlclt due to an intrusion oftropical air, and Nvidespread precipitation caused by cyclonic storms that approach the state from the southwest. Flash floods result from powerhd, slow- movinu thunderstorm.. :'erratic annual \alucS li,r carious weather data components for the Hopkins area are listed below in fable 9.1:Avcrage annual Wcathcr Data. Table 9.1. Average Annual Weather Data Weather Data Value Annual Normal Temperature 43' Annual Normal Precipitation 29 inches Annual Runoff Depth 4.7 inches Storm Duration 6 hours Storm Intensity 1.4 inches per hour Time Between Storm Midpoints 89 hours Additional description of the climate of the area is provided in the MCWD Water Resources Management Plan. Surface Water Resources Wetlands Fhe National Wetland Inventory Map shows the location and type of wetlands within the City of Hopkins (see Fitiure 4?). In addition to these basins, there are several storm water detention basins Nvithin the Citv limits which provide some of the bcnehts of a natural Nvetland basin. There are fine Mimicsota Department of'Nattiral Resources ('N1NDNR) ProtectedWaters andWetlands (:N1NDN R Nos. 27 -717W, 27 -719P. ?7- 777P, and 27 -7799) within the City. Part of'MNi DNR No. 27 -084P is located in the northern section ol'the City. This protected water is also shared by the cities of St. Louis Park and :Minnetonka. 0 of • Creeks Minnehaha Creek Minnehaha Creek is a direct tributary to the Mississippi River. Lake Minnetonka is the headwater for the creek. It is a MNDNR watercourse and flows east at the north end of Hopkins and southeast on the east side of the City. Nine Mile Creek The headwater of the north fork of Nine Mile Creek is at the southern edge of Excelsior Boulevard in the southwest portion of Hopkins. Nine Mile Creek flows southeast to the Minnesota River, and is a MNDNR protected watercourse. Ditches Much of the surface water is routed through an existing storm sewer system within the City of Hopkins. This includes a system of storm sewer pipes, ponds, ditches, and culverts. General Drainage Patterns The City of Hopkins lies within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD). The northern and eastern portions of the City drain to Minnehaha Creek, and the southern and central portions of the City drain to Nine Mile Creek. The City has been delineated into about 60 subwatersheds. The City of Hopkins has numerous points of discharge from and to the cities of Minnetonka, Edina, and St. Louis Park. The City of Hopkins contains several land- locked areas. A land - locked area is one which will not drain naturally on the ground surface. An outlet for each of these areas should be considered to decrease the flooding potential. HvdroloQic Modelin A HydroCADTM model has been created for specific studies within the City of Hopkins, but there has not been a hydrologic model cre- ated for the entire City; however, detailed hydrologic information for each of the subwatersheds can be seen in Appendix A. The following paragraphs discuss areas of concern in the City. • CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN Kopkims comprehensive plan page 9 -i CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOt Ri f VlA :�cF.ntEtir PLAN K o king comorehemi\ page 9-6 Central District Shady Oak Road Duck Pond An cxistin` pond along tihadv Oak Road bct-vecn 1st Street North and 2nd titrcct North has been a source for nuisance floodin along tihadv Oak Road. No structural damage to residences has been documented. Presently, there is no outlet for this pond and clurinu particular storms the pond « overflow onto Shad- Oak Road. 1'hc Duck Pond receives runoil' li both the cities of .Minnetonka and Hopkins. Acrnrdin` to ilwWater Resource Mana`emrni Plan for the City of Min- netonka, the Duck Pond can discharge I 1 cfs to the Cite of Minnetonka through a 21 -in(h pipe culycrt, with the remaining \valor dischargin- to the Citv 4 Hopkins. Sexeral concept designs were considered, but the preferred option as directed from City staff is to construct a tiravity outlet. ff Phis concept design includes two outlets for the pond, one that Nvill discharge to 'Minnetonka and the other that will discharge to Hop - kips. 'I he Minnetonka outlet will be a - -inch pipe that discharges to a wetland west of Shadv Oak Read. The Hopkins urayity outlet Will be through <torm sewer on i st Street North and down I Sth Avenue North, which chains to Nine 'Mile Creek. 'I'llis project has been included in the Capital Impl Plan. A should be completed for this area to further f >rmal 1�asihility study define the i <sucs, desi options, and construction costs. Van Buren Area The Van BurcnArca Drainage titudv was completed by SEH in February ?00.1. The Minnehaha Creek %Vatershed District Engineer also com- pleted a technical memorandum re`ardino this area. The purpose of both studies was to review storm water plans for the Plantation site, and to determine the effectiveness of replacing two 8 -inch C.MP culverts under %an Buren Avenue that ultimately chain a large drain- age area, mcludin(l Area 5 as mentioned above. The MCWD Eugincer recommended replacing the two culverts due to the condition of the culverts. The ends are damaged and are nearly subuterged durin`` dry weather. Accorduig to the uictnorandum the cul\ contain a foot or more of sediment. The (`'itv replaced these two culverts in the sunnier of 72007. • • Southern District Thermotech The Thermotech building is located south of 5th Street South and west of 11 th Avenue, and has experienced flooding problems in the past. These flooding problems include nuisance flooding of the parking lot, potential car flooding, and loss of use of the parking lot. Approximately 140 acres of land drain to the low point west of the Thermotech building, which includes land in the City of Hopkins and the City of Minnetonka. There are two constructed storm water deten- tion ponds upstream of the Hopkins corporate limit which capture most of the runoff from the City of Minnetonka. Outflow from the ponds enters a marsh area in Hopkins along the SOO line railroad tracks, and flows northeast. An existing 12 -inch pipe allows high water in the marsh area to drain into Nine Mile Creek. i s Much of the area will be flooded in a 100 -year event. A proposed outlet for the marsh will reduce the high water levels near the exist- ing buildings during a 100 -year storm event that does not coincide with a 100 -year flood on Nine Mile Creek. An improvement method considered to date included the excavation of additional storage in the ponds, surface restoration, and a 36 -inch or 42 -inch pipe. The ponds were reconstructed several years ago. The box culvert under the rail- road tracks, along with the 36 -inch stub for Thermotech has also been constructed. The construction was completed in 2000. The following table is a list of important studies that have been com- pleted in the City of Hopkins. For additional information, please see the listed studies and reports inTable 9.2: Summary of Water Resources Studieseasibility. CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN l opkim comprehensive flan page 9 -7 CHAPTER 9 - WATER RFSOt R(I , MANAGE11ENT PLAN Table 9.2 - Summary of Water Resources Studieseasibility 0 Design Criteria Design Storm The 24-hour duration, Natural Resources Conservation Seri ice (NRC'S) N pe 11 rainfall distribution Keith avera`e soil moisture conditions ( MINI(' - 2) Neill he used for overall sub«atershcd plannim, within the C'itN of' Hopkins. fhc rainfall depths for storms associated witli various return periods is shown below in'lable 9.3: Raintall Depths for 24 -Hr Event. This criterion is consistent with the MCWD Water Resources Man - agement Plan, the NMC W'D 509 Plan, and Tuidaiicc from the NRC'S. .More recent data developed by I Itlff and Anoel (1991)) vary somewhat from these values. Table 9.3 Rainfall Depths for 24 -hr Ewnt (USWB TP -40 l opkifies comprehemn page 9 -8 I I Return Period 1 - yr Rah&fl Depth (inches) 2.3" Study Name Study Type Prepared By Date Oak Park Land Townhouses Flood Letter RCM July 1992 Evaluation Calculations 5.9" Hopkins Plaza /Hopkins Home Center Feasibility Report RCM July 1997 Storm Water 6th Avenue North and 3rd Street North Feasibility Study and Report RCM November 1997 Intersection Nine Mile Creek Bank Stabilization/ Feasibility Report RCM December 1997 Sediment Removal Area 2 Hilltop Park, Area 3 -Alley Feasibility Report RCM March 1998 Between 17th and 18th Avenues North, Area 4 -13th Avenue North - Maetzold Field Area 5 - Alley between 8th and 9th Feasibility Report RCM September 1998 Avenues North Super Valu Redevelopment Drainage Calculations Westwood Professional September 1998 Services, Inc. Van Buren Avenue Drainage Study Drainage Study SEH, Inc. January 2004 0 Design Criteria Design Storm The 24-hour duration, Natural Resources Conservation Seri ice (NRC'S) N pe 11 rainfall distribution Keith avera`e soil moisture conditions ( MINI(' - 2) Neill he used for overall sub«atershcd plannim, within the C'itN of' Hopkins. fhc rainfall depths for storms associated witli various return periods is shown below in'lable 9.3: Raintall Depths for 24 -Hr Event. This criterion is consistent with the MCWD Water Resources Man - agement Plan, the NMC W'D 509 Plan, and Tuidaiicc from the NRC'S. .More recent data developed by I Itlff and Anoel (1991)) vary somewhat from these values. Table 9.3 Rainfall Depths for 24 -hr Ewnt (USWB TP -40 l opkifies comprehemn page 9 -8 I I Return Period 1 - yr Rah&fl Depth (inches) 2.3" 2 - yr 2.7" 5- yr 3.5" 10 -yr 4.1" 50 -yr 5.3" 100 -yr 5.9" • • Rain Gages The City of Hopkins has a rain gage on the public works building. There are four other rain gages in the surrounding area that can be used to obtain rainfall data; the Minneapolis National Weather Service Station and the cities of Crystal, St. Louis Park, and Eden Prairie have rain gages. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) also has stations in the cities of Mound and New Hope. Land Collection System The minimum design storm for the future local collection system evaluation and design will be a 10 -year return period event. Design of local storm sewer systems will generally be designed using the Ra- tional Formula. The choice of a design storm is largely an economic rather than a technical decision. The City should deliberately consider the level of service desired when it chooses the recurrence interval used in any construction project. Additional rainfall probability data are included in Appendix A. Other City Requirements Any new construction of development has the potential of increasing runoff rates and volumes. The development or redevelopment must include facilities to provide water quality treatment and control runoff at existing or reduced rates. Variances from plan standards will be allowed if computations that demonstrate no adverse upstream or downstream effects will result from the proposed system can be provided to the City Engineer. A description of `Development Standards' is included in Appendix F. CHAPTER 9 - WATER RE SOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN K OPklns comprehensive plan T page 9 -9 CHAPTER 9 - WATER REsot kC t I MANA6E.h1ENT PLAN • Geology and Hydrogeology Soils Hie superficial geolow of the Hopkins area consists of unconsolidated sediments of,lacial deposits derived from the Des Moines Lobe, Grants - bill tiublobe, and a small amount from the Superior Lobe. The glacial sediments were deposited durin(j the most recent glacial event, the I _ate \\ sill ian, which ended about ten thousand years a`(). These deposits consist of till and outwash deposits. Surficial Hydrogeology The unconsolidatcd ()facial rang c has a thickness from io to ?50 feet within the Citv of Hopkins. The water from the local groundwater table is most easily obtained from uut\\ash deposit, with broad areas of till actin` as conl'inin layers. Groundwater flow in the unconsolidated ;,facial deposit, is tienerally cast toward the 'Mississippi River. The water table is approximately 900 fret above mean sea level. Bedrock Geology As stated above, the depth to bedrock ran,,es from So to 25o feet in the City of Hopkins. 'The Cite sits on the western side of the Twin Cities basin, a bowl -like structure in the bedrock. At this location, the bedrock strata dips ently toward the east. The vounwest and strait,graphical1v hi`hest bedrock underlyin, the Citv consists of the Plateville and Glenwood Formations. Hnderlyin the Platcville and Glenwood Formations is the tit. Peter Sandstone, which along \yith the Plateyille and Glenwood formations, make up almost all of the Uppermost bedrock of the Cite. Bedrock Hydrogeology Four major bedrock aquifers underlie I Iopkins. Thee are the St. Peter Sandstone, Prairie clu Chien-Jordan, the Franconia- Ironton - Galesville, and the Mount Simon - Hinckley. These aquiters are separated by lower permeability confinin` layers. The first encountered confined bedrock aquifer is the tit. Peter sandstone, the second aquifer is the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. The St. Lawrence Confininti Layer separates the Prairie du C'hicn- Jordan Aquifer from the undcrlyinti Franconia - HoeKlnei comprehensiN , page 9 -10 0 CHAPTER 9 - W ATER RESOU MANAGEMENT PLAN Ironton - Galesville Aquifer. The Eau Claire Confining Layer separates the Franconia - Ironton - Galesville Aquifer from the deepest aquifer, the Mt. Simon - Hinckley Aquifer. The groundwater flow direction in the bedrock aquifers is generally southeast in the Hopkins area. The St. Peter Sandstone is the first encountered confined bedrock aquifer. The upper part of the formation consists of fine to medium grained friable quartz sandstone. The lower part of the St. Peter Sand- stone contains multicolored beds of mudstone, siltstone and shale with interbedded very coarse sandstone. Many sand grains in the lower part are dark gray in color. The Prairie du Chien-Jordan Auifer is made up of the Prairie du Chien group and the Jordan Sandstone. The Prairie du Chien Group consists of a sandy dolostone with minor amounts of shale. The Jor- dan Sandstone is a fine to coarse grained quartzose sandstone with minor amounts of shale. The Prairie du Chien is the most heavily used aquifer in Hennepin County, with potential yields of 1,000 to • 2,000 gallons per minute. Underlying the Prairie du Chien- Jordan is the St. Lawrence Confining Layer. The St. Lawrence is comprised of lower permeability siltstone and dolostone and acts to hydrologically separate the overlying Prairie du Chien - Jordan from the underlying Franconia- Ironton- Galesville. The Franconia - Ironton - Galesville Aquifer is made up of the Franconia Formation, comprised of glauconitic sandstone with some shale and dolomite; the Ironton Sandstone, and the Galesville Sandstone. This aquifer is commonly used for domestic water supply wells in the north and northwestern portions of Hennepin County. Underlying the Franconia - Ironton - Galesville is the Eau Claire Confining Layer. The Eau Claire consists of siltstone, shale, and silty sandstone and serves to hydrologically separate the overlying Franconia - Ironton - Galesville from the underlying Mount Simon - Hinckley. The Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer is made up of the Mount Simon and Hinckley Formations. The Mount Simon Formation is a silty, fine -to- coarse - grained sandstone with thin beds of very fine -to -fine grained sandstone and minor shale beds. The Hinckley is absent in most places, but where it occurs it is in remnants only several tens of feet thick. K0pkim coml rehensive plan page 9 -11 CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOI K( f ti MANAGERIENT PLAN 0 Recharge Zones Recharoe to the bedrock aquilccrs beneath the Cite of Hopkins occurs in two ways, vertically and laterally. Vertical recharge occurs through overlvin olacial sediments old other bedrock aquifers. Lateral recharge (-curs as oroundwater moves laterally from outside the City or County through the aquifer. The lateral recharge to the bedrock aquifers in Hopkins conies from the Nvest. Recharge to the eater lable Aquifer occurs primarily from precipita- tion and surface water groundwater interactions as well as laterally from outside the Citv. Local Groundwater Models The Hennepin County Conser\ation District (HCD), in cooperation With the Minnesota Dcpartmcnt of Hcalth, has dcy (-loped a County-- idc multi -laNcr groundwater model. 'phis modal Inav hr a valuable tool in dealing with many ol' Hopkins' groundwater issues. This model could he useful \yith issues such as wellhead protection, storm \vatcr infiltration ponds, wetland issues, Well siting, dcN attiring, etc. The :Minnesota Pollution Control Agencv (NIPCA) is currently de\el- nping a Metropolitan Groundwater Model. phis model is a reoional model focusing on the seven- County metropolitan area including Hen- nepin Count\ 1•he focus of the NIPCA model is more for eyaluatino `Jroundwater contamination and renrc•cliation of the (quaternary and the Prairie Du Chien aquifers. The NIPC.A model and the HCD model utilize the Multi -I awl Anaktical Llement M(Ael (MLAEW). The HCD model, however, is characterized as a single laver. The City of Hopkins has prepared a water and sanitary' sewer system update to its Comprehensive Plan fc,r the period 2008 - 2030. This sumin ary presents a profile (,f the existiI a conditions, needs assessment, and recommendations for improvement., during the planning period. Existing alter and Sanitary Server System Summary The Hopkins water and sanitary surer system has been continuously maintained with parts of the system datino before 1 902. The system has been adapted by additions, modifications, and technological control ad- vances as operational equipment and distribution method; have become Hopk1nes comprehenm page 9 -11 CHAPTER 9 - W ATER RESOU MANAGEMENT PLAN more sophisticated and efficient over the years. The city's population growth and new development has largely stabilized, allowing system needs to be incrementally diagnosed with improvements that could be funded and implemented over time. Recently, the City of Hopkins has become poised for new growth that will add housing units near the downtown area and in the East Hopkins RedevelopmentArea, as well as new commercial development adjacent to Highway 169 that will add new employment opportunities. The proposed developments will require some adjustments to the current system to accommodate the growth, accelerate needs that may be im- minent to accommodate new development, and suggest that greater efficiencies can be obtained by planning to purchase replacement equip- ment and engaging neighboring communities in the implementation of plan recommendations. Water and Sanitary Sewer System Analysis and Recommended Improvements The following assessments and recommendations are outlined below and examined in greater detail in the contents of the 2008 -2030 Com- prehensive Utility Plan. Water Supply The City's water is supplied by four ground water wells (Well Nos. 1, 4, 5, and 6). Based upon the projected maximum day demands, Hopkins should plan for a reliable supply capacity of 5.9 million gal- lons per day (MGD) in 2007, 6.2 MGD in 2012, and 6.6 MGD in 2030. The design of supply facilities is based upon the maximum day demand requirements. Supply facilities should be able to meet the maximum day demand with the largest well out of service, which is referred to as "firm capacity." A new well should not be required to provide adequate firm capacity. Well No. 1 is the City's only well that is not treated for iron and man- ganese contaminants. Use of Well No. 1 could result in "rusty" water complaints from customers due to the high iron levels in this well; therefore, polyphosphate and chlorine chemical feed systems should be added at Well No. 1 to help sequester and hold the iron minerals in solution. Hopkins comprehensive plan page 9 -]3 CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOL R( { , ' IANAGENTNT PLAN Hopkinos comf )rehensi, page 9-14 • The realiability of the City's wells is dependent on the availability of corer (,envy power supplies. Generator hook -ups (manual transfer switches) are recommended for Well \o. 5 and Well \o. 6 to allow portable , encrators to power these wells durin(, extended power out- ages. Maintenance for the C itv's wells will he required on an on(min(, basis. The city should plan to inspect and rehabilitate each Nyell every ten rears and replace each well pump every ten rears for burl (,etim purposes. Water Treatment Hopkins is served by the Elmo Park Water Treatment Plant. The plant is effectively treating the raw water supply for iron and manoanese contaminants in addition to providin(, disinfcetion and Iluoride for dental care. Improvements are reconnnended for the Elmo Park plant includin(, an emer`ency tienerator to operate the plant during extended power outages. The cxistino treatment plant has a capacity of 4,51)0 `pm or 7.0 MGD. . The reliable treatment capacity is 1,500 opm (2.62 when one of the filter cells is removed from service. The Elmo Plant has the potential to be expanded in the future to increase the reliable capacity of thr plant. l'hesr improve- ments would increase the reliable rapacity to 7.25 MGD. The City's reliable treated water capacity would incrca c to 5.4 MGD with use (£\Fell \o. 1. This capacity would be sufficient to meet the projected maximum day demand in 2030. A water treatment plant evaluation study is rcconnnended for the Flmo Park plant in 2016 to assess the condition of the plant and provide recommendations for cxpandinu the plant. The expansion of the Ffmo Park plant is recommended in 2017. Water Storage The City currently ha, 1,000,000 (_)allons stored in elcyated tanks and 2,200,000 tiallons stored in (,round water tanks. SEH conducted a stor- a (,e analysis to determine the adequacy ofthe existin(, ( and stora,,e capacities l()r the present and estimated future conditions. Based on the analysi,, the City's total stora (,e capacity is adequate if \ti - ater can be pumped at all times from (,round stora (,e. The installation ofemcroencv • 0 generators at the Elmo Park Water Treatment Plant and the Moline pump house building are recommended to provide this capability. The Moline tank was last recoated in 1999. The condition of the coat- ing system appears adequate with no visible signs of peeling or rust spots. A properly applied coating system should last approximately 15 years; therefore, the City should plan to recoat the Moline tank in 2014. The coating system on the Blake tank was last recoated in 2001. The condition of the coating system also appears adequate with no visible signs of peeling or rust spots. The City should plan to recoat the Blake tank in 2016. Water Distribution With new residential and commercial developments in the downtown area, opportunities exist to extend a 12 -inch trunk water main through the center of town to increase fire flows and provide greater redun- dancy in newly redeveloped areas. Currently, the City has an existing 12 -inch stub extended north to the intersection of 10th Avenue South and Mainstreet. This 12 -inch main should be extended north to an eventual connection with Highway 7. The City has many hydrants that are very old and should be replaced to provide reliable fire protection. The City should plan to replace approximately 600 of these hydrants in the next ten years (60 hydrants per year). Water Redundancy Analysis To improve the City's emergency water supply, interconnections can be constructed with several neighboring communities. Currently, the City of Hopkins has one interconnection with the City of Minnetonka. Interconnections are recommended with the cities of Edina and St. Louis Park. These interconnections will provide additional insurance to help the City supply adequate volumes of water during maximum day and emergency conditions. CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN Sanitary Sewer Collection System The City of Hopkins' sanitary sewer system consists of approximately 231,000 LF of sanitary sewer pipe ranging from 4 to 33 inches in diameter. Based on analysis on segments of the system serving the Hopkins comprehensiveplm page 9 -15 CH. -WFER 9 - WATER RESOI kc i MANA(AMENT PLAN • proposed redevelopment in the downtown and east area there appears to he sufficient capacity for conyevancr of additional future I]oNv Nvithin the study period. velocities in the majority of' seuments analyzed also appear to he adequate with the exception of'a scwcr main located on Blake Road, north of Excelsior Boulevard. While this se,ment has the capacity to carry the estimated tilture Ilow, the current and future velocities Nyithin the seNycr Nyill continue to pose problems and require a higher level ol'naaintrnance to keep the seiyer clear. the Cite should inyestitTate the feasibility of reconstruction of' this sewer at steeper slope to increase velocities in the pipe. Some consideration should also he ivcn to redircctinu the sewer to the north for dischar(le into the 3 3 -inch trunk seNver in Lake Street. The City should initiate a cite -wide CC IA tcicyisin(� inspection pro - `ram for all sanitary sewer lines. This proactive measure would he phased to complete different areas of the City over a 5 -rear period. After the complete sewer system is televised, the City would then rcyicw the need for a continued CCTV sewer inspection pro(,ram. hifOrmatinn fathered from CCTV tele�isin` inspections is vital in deternninirn` the condition of the. seWrr and service connections. It • is also an important tool in idcntil and resol infiltration and inflow (1 /I) issues. The City has programmed the elimination of Lilt Station No. 1 into the 1 009 street reconstruction project. The lift station will he clenaolished and replaced by a lira\ ity sever line that «ill be constructed from the corner of tiecond Street North and 21 s1 Avenue North (the currant location of Lift ')tation No. I ) we >t to Shady Oak Road. Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations I'he City of I lopkins mviis and operates seven sanitary sewer lift sta- tions. Pump clo\\ n tests were pre lc,rmed at all lilt stations, and pump cycle times were reviewed and provided to the City. A visual inspec- tion Nyas also performed. All of the lift stations, based on available data and iiAOrmation `athered from the pump down tests, appear to he operating at adequate levels pumpm capacity. The pump cycle times provided by the City appear to he hi`h at some stations. High cyclin(I results in more pump starts and subsequently higher operation casts. The lilt stations xyith high nu nbcrs of cycle ( "pump on ° less than 3 - minute intervals) should he investigated to verily if floats or other flop 1_, level sensors should be adjusted. . LC1nc5 comprehentin page 9 -16 • The City should continue routine maintenance of the lift stations including bi- annual inspections and cleaning, which includes: wet - well cleaning, pump impellor, bearing and seal inspection, and float resets if necessary. Check valves and isolation valves should also be inspected. A prioritized lift station rehabilitation program should also be imple- mented. The rehabilitation program would provide the City a means of strategically managing its sewer in a cost effective and efficient manner. The program allows for an operation and maintenance approach in a proactive rather than a reactive manner. Over the study period the recommended individual lift station reha- bilitation items were divided into short (0 -5 years), medium (5 -10 years), and long -term (over 10 years). For pump replacement pur- poses a pump service life of 15 years was used. In the short term, Lift Station Nos. 2, 3 and 4 should have pumps replaced due to length of service life. In addition, Lift Station No. 4 should be additionally rehabilitated including the following: grouting and sealing the wet well, and installation of a new hatch and concrete cover. With these substantial improvements it is also recommended that a separate valve vault be constructed. Medium range recommendations include pump replacement at Lift Station Nos. 5 and 6. Long range items include pump replacement at Lift Station No. 7. • CHAPTER 9 - WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN H oQk1neB comprehensive flan page 9 -17 • CHAPTER iO - SOLID WASTE PLAN City of Hopkins Program A set of overall goals provide a framework for solid waste initiatives in Hopkins. Pertaining to solid waste, the City of Hopkins seeks to: Goals • Continue to provide residential refuse collection necessary to ensure public health and safety. • Continue to encourage residents to reduce their solid waste generation. • • Continue to provide recycling services to all single family, duplex and triplex household units and enforce mandatory ordinance. Maximize efficiency with regard to refuse and recycling collections. • Support alternatives to disposal which emphasize the reuse ofmaterials whenever possible. Keep the community clean. Provide adequate, reliable and effective waste disposal and recycling at reasonable cost to residents. • Continue to advocate waste reduction activities and the use of recycled products within the City offices. The City of Hopkins provides refuse collection services using City personnel and automated equipment. These services are provided to all residential properties to include single family, duplex and triplex household units. Refuse service consists of weekly collection of house- hold trash, bulk items, yard waste and brush. Solid waste collected by the City is taken to the Hennepin County Transfer Station in Brooklyn Park. It is then delivered to HERC where it is incinerated and used to produce energy. Kopkim comprehensive plan page 10 -1 CHAPTER 10 -SOLID WASrt- Pi Single Stream RecN collection is offered hi- weekly through a separate contract. :Materials collected for recycling include; newspaper, nnisecl- laneous paper, -f C's and cardboard, metal cans, glass bottles and jars, and plastic bottles. Recyclable material collected is marketed by the contracted hauler. Revenue ,haring option,, exist when market prices exceed $40 for newsprint and ti500 f aluminum simultaneously. Multi - family housing and comincrcial properties must contract for the disposal of their solid waste and recycling. To encourage waste reduction the City implunented a mandatory recycling ordinance in 1990. This ordinance mandates the separate collection of solid waste and reeyclables generated by both residential and commercial properties. 'lo assist residents and businesses with recycling the City operates a recycling chop -off center jointly with the City of 'Minnetonka. Household hazardous waste programs are administered by Hennepin Countv. Residents and .mall businesses ha\e wo -year round facilities where they e an dispose of household hazardous wastes and certain small husiness hazardous \vastes. :Mobile collection sites are also hosted twice per year in nrarh\ communities. Refuse generation rates started to decline in 1959 after the Cite imple- nuntrd the curbside recycling program and continued to decline until 1990 ,at which time we began seeing fluctuating increases each year. In 2002 Single Stream Recycling was implemented to increase Hopkins recvcling rate and continue the decrease in refuse material collected. Hopkins has been collecting yard waste and brush separate from regular refuse since the 1970s. 'Material collected throe h the City's yard waste and brush programs are composted or chipped lC)r use by residents of Hopkins and nearby communities. Me Citv's solid waste collection system encourages residents to reduce waste through our mandatory recycling ordinance, volume -based pricing structure, and added fees for extra refuse and bulk. Additionally the Cite regularly provides promotional materials and activities to educate. residents on waste reduction, reuse, recycling and purchasing recycled products. Our current inn -house purchasing policy advocates the purchase ofproducts made with recycled content. u • Hopkin's comprehensr ,!-' page 10.1 C] 0 • CHAPTER 10 -SOLID WASTE PLAN Table 10.1 shows the City of Hopkins solid waste tonnage collected from our residential refuse customers for the past five years. The City of Hopkins collects refuse from 2945 households and recycling from 2990 households. Table 10.1 - Solid Waste by Tonnage Refuse/Recycle Service Refuse Pick -up Weekly 2002 3228 2003 2578 2004 2633 2005 2626 2006 2577 2007 2411 Recycle Pick Up - Bi- weekly 849 996 988 1005 986 917 Recycle Drop Off Mtka Site 184 205 186 166 227 277 Recycling Total Yard Waste/Brush Services Yard Waste Pick Up 1033 261 1201 328 1174 333 1171 335 1213 261 1194 237 Yard Waste Drop -Off 184 205 186 166 277 277 Yard Waste Total 445 533 519 501 488 514 Brush Pick Up 210 224 175 131 138 143 Brush Drop Off 74 108 75 62 77 73 Brush Total Bulk Services Bulk Refuse - Weekly Pick up 284 44 332 41 250 36 193 14 215 25 216 29 Bulk Refuse - Drop Off - Spring /Fall 210 201 196 119 179 134 Bulk Refuse Total 254 242 232 133 204 163 Bulk Recycle - Weekly Pick Up ** 17 12 8 10 10 9 Bulk Recycle - Drop -Off * A 19 E9 A 29 E17 A25 E17 A 18 E11 A 19 E9 A 16 E12 Bulk Recycle Total 45 58 50 39 38 37 *A = Appliance Tonnage E = Electronic Tonnage * *Appliance Tonnage Hopkins comprehensive plan page ]0.3 CHAPTER 10 - SOEID WASTE Pi \. . 110p1iris comprehensn page 10-4 Goals • Continue to provide residential refine collection necessary to ensure public health and ,alety. • Continue to encourage residents to reduce their solid waste generation. • Continue to provide recycling sere ices to all single family, duplex and triplex household unit; and enforce mandatory ordinance. • Maximize efficiencv with regard to refuse and recycling col - lections. • Support alternatives to disposal that emphasize the reuse of materials whenever possible. • Deep the community clean. • Provide adequate, reliable and effective waste disposal and re- cvchn` at reasonable cost to residents. Continue to advocate waste reduction activities and the use of recvcled products Nyithin the City offices. • .7 • • The Implementation Chapter is intended to carry out the goals and objectives set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. To be most effective, the Comprehensive Plan needs to address short -term and long -tern planning needs followed by implementation steps. The focus of this Chapter is to outline those steps. It is important to recognize that the Comprehensive Plan is a living and breathing document. Unforeseen changes in the market, new de- velopments or industry standards may impact the plan. Recognizing the potential for change will require the City to periodically evaluate the plan to ensure that the City's goals and policies are being met. The City will carry this out as an implementation strategy. To ensure the Plan is meeting future needs, it will be implemented in a number of ways. The most common practice is through municipal con- trols and programs, such as zoning and capital improvements. Within the City's Zoning Ordinance, zoning districts (see figure 11.1) have been established, including minimum lot size requirements and control densities. State law requires consistency between a community's zoning ordinance and its comprehensive plan. One of Hopkins' first imple- mentation strategies will be to thoroughly review the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance for consistency. A summary of the City's current zoning districts can be found in Appendix B. The City has also established a Capital Improvement Program that is updated annually. The Comprehensive Plan involves more than just enforcing municipal controls and implementing capital improvements. A successful plan is carried out on a day -to -day basis. Each chapter in this Plan has set a foundation for carrying out a series of action steps or strategies. To measure the success of the action steps and strategies, an action step matrix is included. The intent of the matrix is to track specific action steps, responsible parties, time frames and potential costs associated with each step. Not all the action steps are anticipated to be carried out within the timeframe of this update. The matrix serves as a reminder of tasks at hand for staff, elected officials and various boards. The action steps highlighted in the following table are developed based on the goals and policies identified in the plan and the broader com- munity strategies identified. CHAPTER I I - IMPLEMENTATION Action Sten Definitions Time Frame Short Term = Completing within 1 — 3 years MiclTerm = Completing within 3 — S years Long Term = Completing within S — 10 years Cost $ - Low Cost ($0 - $20,000) $$ - Medium Cost ($20,000 - $100,000) $ $ $ - High Cost ( > $100,000) Hopkim comprehensive plan page 11 -1 CHAPTER I I - IMPLENIENTATIW, Figure 11.1 -Hopkins Zoning Nlap City of Hopkins Zoning Map w ' _ 1 1 a �t R2 Zoning Districts R -1 -A SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY HIGH DENSITY R -1 -B SINGLE FAMILY HIGH DENSITY R -1 -C SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY R -1 -D SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY J am , R -1 E SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY R 2 LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY R 3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY R -4 MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY R -5 HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY - R -6 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY B-1 LIMITED BUSNIESS B-2 CENTRAL BUSINESS B 3 GENERAL BUSINESS B-4 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS 1 1 INDUSTRIAL 2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK INSTITUTIONAL 0 800 1,600 3200 4,800 6,400 Feet Hop kins comLyehensn page 11 -1 A • `, la i aYnNnwuL - R. -C • • Table 11.1- Implementation Table CHAPTER I I - IMPLEMENTATION Chapter Action • Description Responsible Party • Review & update State law requires consistency between a com- zoning and subdi- munity's zoning ordinance and its comprehensive City ShortTerm $ plan. Ordinances need to be thoroughly reviewed to vision ordinance. ensure consistency. The City will continue to monitor and balance land uses within Hopkins and adjacent jurisdictions. The Ensure compatible City will need to continue to coordinate future land City On going $ land use patterns. use patterns with future Light Rail Transit (LRT) initiatives. The City will ensure that new development and the Land Use redevelopment of sites apply a high -level of exterior aesthetics that complement and support surrounding Expand design uses. This includes incorporating design standards City On going $ - $ $ standards. already in place for Mainstreet. The City will also explore expanding design standards for Shady Oak Road and mixed -use developments. Study the implica- The City will carefully study the implications on tions on land uses land uses for pending reconstruction, widening and City & ShortTerm - patterns adjacent realignment of Shady Oak Road. The City will also County Mid Term $ - $ $ to major transpor- study the land uses for Blake Road for future rede- tation corridors. velopment with the LRT station. The City should continue to monitor and assess the downtown parking plan. The parking plan should be Downtown Monitor down - utilized whenever development or redevelopment City Ongoing $ -$$ town parking. occurs, and its recommendations should be continu- ally pursued. r s 110pkim comprehensive plan page 11 -3 CHAPTER I I - NPLEMEN'TATIU'. • .7 ffopkino t omprehensn JL page II -J The City will reoularh- monitor and assess the eflectiyeness of existing housing programs (i.e. , Monitor housing Truth in Housing Pro,ram, Housin(j Improvements, programs and ef- Residential Rehabilitation Loan /Grant Prouain and City On goinu S SS forts. First -Time Home Bmer Prouratns). The City will also monitor foreclosure activity and respond ap- Housing ro >riatel\-. The City will continue to enforce housin` codes and assess the existinti h< ntsinti maintenance codes to Actively enforce City, Comm ensure they are inectinv the overall need of Hopkins. Ohl 0oinv $ housing codes. c, Rc`ion Existinc maintenance codes should be reNised and or developed to achicyc this initiative as necessary. Conduct master Master plannim, cf orts should occur to determine Citv, County S S planning for the Long Term the sites availability for future pudic uses. 8, Reuion S S S landfill site. Conduct master City, County - - Nlaster planning efforts should occur to determine & Reclion planning for the how the Nlinnehaha Creek Preserve are can he bet- (including the Short Term S - $ $ Minnehaha Creek ter titiliied. \Vatershed Preserve Area. Continue to coordinate with the Thyce Rivers Park Work to enhance a series of trails that District to provide regional trail connections. fhe City, County SS connect to regional Clt\ Nyill evaluate trails & bikeways as part of all ma- & Region On voinu S S S Parks, Open jor roadway projects such as tihady Oak Road, Blake Space & trails. Road and Excelsior Bottlevard. Trails ADA accessible Upurade and innproN e all park buildings to ensure S City Nlid Perin facilities. AD.X accessibihty. $ $ $ 1'he City will cc_,ntinue to evaluate its existing park Evaluate existing facilities and explore opportunities for shared /flex facilities, tble uses to accommodate ener�ing sports, such as Citv On `oin` 5 - S S soccer and lacrosse. Implement he The City will evaluate areas for opportunities to destrian friendly improve liohtino, sidevyalks and other amenities to City O n -ooino S S S routes. make areas more pedestrian friendly. .7 ffopkino t omprehensn JL page II -J