Loading...
Resolution NO: RZ10-3CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ10 -3 RESOL1 ION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOD,IENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ORMER EBCO SITE FROM 1 -2 TO BUSINESS PARK REZONING INF ,cation for Zoning Amendment ZN 10 -2 has been initiated by The City of WHEREAS, an at H ,rocedural history of the application is as follows: WHEREAS, tt hat an application for zoning amendment was initiated by The City of Hopkins; 1. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission published notice, held a 2 public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on March 30, 2010: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; That the written comments and analysis of City staff were considered. 4. The legal description of the property is as follows: Registered Land Survey No. 396 That part of Tract A lying westerly of a line parallel with and distance 119.12 feet westerly from northerly extension of east line of northeast 1 /4 of Section 25 Township 117 Range 22 Registered Land Survey No. 264 That part of Tract A Registered Land Survey No. 264 lying westerly y of east a line drawn parallel with and 119.12 feet westerly from northerly of northeast 1 /4 Section 25 Township 117 Range 22 Auditor's Subdivision No. 242 Lot 8 Commencing at a point in south line of Lot 8 distance 238.62 feet west from southeast corner of southeast 1 /4 of Section 24 thence northeasterly deflecting 22 degrees 48 minutes 25 seconds from south line thereof to its intersection with a line parallel with and distance 119.12 thence northerly along said extension of line to east line of northeast 1 /4 of Section 25 northerly line of Lot 8 thence westerly along northerly line thereof to most northerly corner thereof thence southwesterly along northwesterly line thereof to a th 15 point 152.14 feet northeasterly from corner begunning degrees east distance 95.08 feet to south line of Lot except road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for Zoning Amendment ZN10 -2 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan designation will be consistent. Adopted this 30th day of March, 10 //1 Robert Hatlestad, Chair