Loading...
CR 11-080 Area Variance - 132 Interlachen Rd• C] • GITY OF 4ca /-/0 P K INS Council Report I I -80 August 3I, 2011 � AREA VARIANCE —132 INTERLACHEN ROAD Proposed Action Staff recommends the following motion: Adopt Resolution 11-43 approving an area variance for 132 Interlachen Road. At the Zoning and Planning meeting, Ms. Cummings moved and Mr. Fisher seconded a motion to adopt Resolution RZ11-14, recommending approval of an area variance for 132 Interlachen Road. The motion was approved unanimously. Overview The applicant, Albert Kempf, has razed the existing home and will be constructing a new home at 132 Interlachen. 132 Interlachen consists of two 40 -foot lots. The former home straddled the two lots, as would the new home. The problem is that in the past homes were allowed to straddle lot lines. This was not a good practice and is not allowed today. To remedy the situation the owner will have to replat. Interlachen Park was platted as 40 -foot lots; however, in this area each home is on two or three 40 -foot lots. The new lot will be 80' x 132'. The minimum lot size in the R -1-C zoning district is 12,000 square feet; the proposed lot has 10, 653 square feet. Without the variance, the lot will be unbuildable. Primary Issues to Consider • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? • What does the ordinance require? • What are the specifics of the applicant's request? • What practical difficulties does the property have? • What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Supporting Documents • Analysis of Issues • Survey • Resolution 11-43 Nancy S. nderson, AICP Planner Financial Impact: $ N/A Budgeted: Y/N Source: Related Documents (CIP, ERP, etc.): Notes: CR11-80 Page 2 • Primary Issues to Consider. • What is the zoning of the property, and how has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The subject property is zoned R -1-C, Single Family Medium Density. The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as Low Density Residential. The proposed use complies with both documents. • What does the ordinance require? The R -1-C district requires a minimum lot size of 12, 000 square feet. • What are the specifics of the applicant's request? The applicant will be re -platting the lots to combine then into one lot of approximately 10,653 square feet. • What practical difficulties does the property have? The new state statute requires three standards for the granting of a variance. The three requirements are: • 1. That practical difficulties cited in connection with the granting of a variance means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Without the granting of this variance the lot will be unbuildable. The lot being unbuildable is a practical difficulty, and granting a variance will provide the applicant a reasonable use of the property. Surrounding uses The site is surrounded by single family homes. • What was the discussion at the Zoning and Planning meeting? Ms. Anderson reviewed the variance request. Mr. Kempf, the applicant, appeared before the Commission. 0 • is CRI 1-80 Page 3 Alternatives. 1. Approve the area variance. By approving the area variance, the applicant will be able to construct the house as proposed. 2. Deny the area variance. By denying the area variance, the applicant will not be able to construct the house as proposed. If the City Council considers this alternative, findings will have to be identified that support this alternative. 3. Continue for further information. If the City Council indicates that further information is needed, the item should be continued. 0 • • •DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM. BENCHMARK - SANITARY MANHOLE ELEVATION 922.3 (NGVD 1929) SURVEY FOR: ALBERT KEMPF SURVEYED: June 22.2010 DRAFTED: June 23, 2010 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 21 and 22, Block 4, F. A. Savage's Interlachen Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. CONTAINS: 10,653 sq. ft. or 0.244 acres PROPERTY ADDRESS: 132 Interlachen Road, Hopkins, Minnesota LIMITATIONS: The scope of our services for this job is as follows: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description which you furnished. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying existing monuments to mark the comers of the property. 4. Showing existing spot elevations necessary to show elevation differences on the site. 5. The property is zoned R -1-C according to the City of Hopkins zoning map. 6. We have provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site, use that benchmark and nothine else for that purpose. Check the elevation of at least one other feature shown to verify your elevations. 7. Note that the adjoining owners names were obtained from the Hennepin County Property information web site. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless otherwise noted. Proposed elevations are shown with a box around i— — — — — — — them, while existing elevations are shown without a box. Arrows indicate the proposed flow of storm water on the site. I CERTIFICATION: I I -- -I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jakf SIH. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 EXIS = 72 FOOT 9DE YARD SETBACK FORA 2 STORY DHEWNC. IT LS 10 F00T SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A — r J - SINGLE STORY OWELING AND A 14 FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A 3 STORY DW2n1NE i -- OWNER I L r 1 I I ! I I 1 1 I I I I GRAPHIC SCALE -F-- — zD 1 D 2D 4n C------- IINF=r AD VANCE SUR VE YljVG & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Y Phone (952) 474-7964 Fax (952) 225-0502 SHEET 1 OF I SHEET r: CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: 11-43 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING AN AREA VARIANCE FOR 132 INTERLACHEN ROAD WHEREAS, an application for Variance VN 11-3 has been made by Albert Kempf; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for Variance VN11-14 was made by Albert Kempf on August 16, 2011; 2. That the Hopkins Zoning and Planning Commission, pursuant to mailed notice, held a meeting on the application and reviewed such application on August 30, 2011: all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff were considered; and 4. Legal description of the parcel is as follows: Lots 21 and 22, Block 4, F.A. Savages Interlachen Park, Hennepin County NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, that application for Variance VN11-14 to reduce the area for a lot from 12,000 to 10,653 square feet is hereby approved based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That 132 Interlachen Road does have a circumstance peculiar and unique to the parcel. 2. That the lot is unbuildable without the variance. 3. That the applicant will not have reasonable use of the property without the granting of a variance. BASED ON THE FOREGOING FINDINGS OF FACT, the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, hereby determines that the literal enforcement of the 12,000 square -foot minimum lot size in the R -1-C zoning district would cause an undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the subject property, that the granting of the requested variance to the extent necessary to compensate for such hardship is in keeping with the intent of the Hopkins City Code, and that the variance of 1,347 square feet is reasonable. Adopted this 6th day of September 2011. ATTEST: Deborah L. Sperling, City Clerk Eugene J. Maxwell, Mayor