Loading...
Memo Arts Facility Public Informational Meeting � CITY OF HOPKINS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1996 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council ��ROM: Paul Steinman, Economic Development Specialist SUBJECT: Arts Facility Public Informational Meetings Recap Attached to this memo are the following items: • A summary of the specific questions and answers from the feedback form . • A summary of all of the written comments received from the f eedback f orm Q • A list of all the people in attendance at each of the public informational meetings � A list of the individuals who spoke at the informationa]. meetings and tY�eir respective questions ancl comments Staff is providing this information simply as a recap to the Council regarding these two meetings. It is staffos general feeling that the meetings were effectively facilitated ancl � questions and input wexe provided in a very positive and constructive manner. Additionally, staff feels that the informational meetings, together with the feedback form, have provided a very comfortable and inviting opportunity for the public to comment and provide their views on the project. � PS03076A � - As of March 6, 1996 � �. RESPONSES TO QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Do you feel adequately informed about the propos�d arts facility? , Yes -166 No - 48 2. What would you come to see, do, or make use of at the arts facility? 117 Children's theater 121 Orchestras 60 Puppet theater 47 Recital space 56 Pop/rock concerts 60 Small reception space/catered food preparation area 103 Choral groups 127 Professional theater 106 Historical displays 74 Other performances �, 65 Meeting space 120 Classical music 137 Community theater 103 Professional speakers 57 Youth ballet 101 Visual/art gallery space 48 Country music Other: • Meeting space for children only • Professional speakers about only the arts • Teen parties • Space for birthday parties, wedding receptions, anniversaries, etc. • I believe it should all be only community related • Artists showing, sharing, teaching their skills • Political caucus • Raspberry Festival events • Town Hall meetings • Teleconferencing meetings • Chicago singers such as John Pryne • Comedy • Rehearsal space � • Poetry readings Page 2 • Classroom for art classes • Depending on cost and disabled accessibility; better than required by ordinance � • Adult ballet classes • Competitive ballroom dance classes for children • Craft classes and opportunity to display them on occasion • Eating facility • City functions • Raspberry meetings • Back up for Music in the Park • Must have time for other performances to help income • Sculpting classes • Art classes • Antique lectures • Space for art lessons • Arts/crafts shows • Foreign films • Travel films • Art classes like the Edina and Minnetonka art centers • Community band concerts • Original films • Cartooning • Silent films • Esoteric films (lost and hard to find and of excellence) • Adult ballet � • Film making � An international arts program--performances especially • Professional ballet • MOVieS •"Fine" arts in gallery, not crafts • Community art shows for adults & children • Kids • A good dance/aerobic studio with proper floor and mirrors • Education/art classes • Drawing and painting classes • Writing groups 3. Will you attend one of the town meetings? Tuesday, February 27 - 57 Sunday, March 3 - 47 4. Would you like to help make this facility a reality? Yes - 64 � t � Pa9e 3 � Yes - when it becomes acceptable (vs. controversial). 5. Age group Upto18 -5 19-29 - 14 30-45 - 35 46-60 - 62 60+ - 86 � � � � As of March 6, 1996 � RESPONSES TO UESTIONNAIRE 4 Comments • Do it! • I'm 100% in favor • Projects such as this will eventually have money problems that cannot be met by raising taxes. There will be a need to reach out for money from pop/rock and even country music performers. Many types of undesirable people who are involved with drugs and crime will have a right to attend and be in our community. AFthough we already have some illegal immigrants and Chicago drug related gang members in our community, our Police Departmenf has been able to keep them under control and to contain the crimes associated with them. Please do not reach out beyond our community for additional financial support. It is better to pay more taxes than to invite additional criminal behavior. I have no doubt this projeet or a similar one will eventually be built- just be careful! � • I think it stinks. We don't need to spend money this crazy. Spend the money for something �. • I think that the rental income is not going to cover operating expenses and that the city cannot afford this! • I think it would be great! I am part of the Arts Association. A place to put on plays and readings, to see plays, to take class, etc. • I think this will be quite an undertaking. I wonder if its really necessary. • Would only be used by very, very few. Get some type of tax paying business--another food store or large type of business which we badly need! Let's get some property back on the tax rolls! • Will the Hopkins schools have first chance to use the new facility or is this just going tobe who can rent offering the most money? I do volunteer work with junior high students at North and would like to see them able to use it often. I believe it should all be only community related!! � Too much tax exempt property now! Tired of being told it will only cost each Q homeowner a few dollars. How much can we afford? Only if not a tax exempt project. NO MORE TAX EXEMPT. Page 2 � • I think Hopkins would be crazy to lose out on an opportunity Iike this. We need � this art center to help create a more positive image of Hopkins. It would be used! • Will this arts facility also include time and space for artists to show and sell their works, such as paintings, sculpture, etc. (and I don't mean an arts and crafts junk show). Also, will this facility provide space and time for art classes? For example, again, painting, sculpture, efc. Thank you. • It's going to cost us much money to own and operate. Rents are not guaranteed. Why hasn't Child's Play Theatre been able to raise private donations from business people? Most art centers are financed from private sources, not governmentaL • Great idea--but has a careful analysis been done to see that the city can manage this facility cheaper than a private/public company? • Hopkins has needed this kind of facility for some time. I support all efforts to bring more of the fine arts to our community: 1 • This newsletter helps. Excellent idea--good for the community. • Big waste of tax payers money! You always do what you like anyhow. Big waste � of time! • Good location--nice to see this Chevrolet site put to an excellent use! • I think the proposals are great. It will be wondertul to have a theater to go to in town. I would enjoy seeing movies, but I am 76 years old and don't drive, so it would be great. Hope we get one soon. • I don't think we need it. I think it needs to be put to a vote to the people of Hopkins--all people of Hopkins as to if we need it. • Hopkins will profit from this addition to our city--both culturally and economically. • The reality is--95% of the people surveyed DO NOT want it. Listen to your people!! We like the theater idea. We do not need, nor can we supp�rt an arts facility here now! • Recognition of the need for arts education and the facilities to make it happen are encouraging. • I am pleased there is interest in the fine arts in Hopkins. I am sure there is a lot of talent in the Hopkins area that can be explored. I want to be part of it. � Page 3 4 • The arts center is great, but Hopkins needs a decent grocery store--Tait's is dirty, crowded, outdated decor and not a pleasant place to shop. There is room in this town for a new store! • Other peoples input--insights. Parking is major concem. Can we acquire more property on that block--build a ramp--would the city not be entitled to a percent of income generated (tickets, rentals, etc.)? • Parking--is there a ramp planned? Would it be free? A great addition to a strong community., • This would be a tax loser and we have too much low income areas. What we need is a new grocery store and not more apartments. • If it can be built, supported by the users, go ahead but don't expect tax payers to help out • The information is repetitious. Let's start the project--we have all waited long enough to determine how best to use this property--the meetings keep dragging on and on--it's time to move forward. � • Parking will be a problem. Our taxes cannot go any higher--would be a lot easier if they were lowered! • I have tried to read and discuss with "people in the know." I think the idea is great--concerned about financial impact, but think the positives for city would be good--what happens if Child's Play folds? • Total waste of tax payers money. This is a Hopkins School District issue. Let them solve it. � I think this should not be something that the City of Hopkins owns. It should be owned and run and financed by the non-profit board. It should sink or swim on its own merits. Few Hopkins people would directly benefit from i�, other than businesses. But taxp�yers would be stuck with ownership if it fails to bring in the revenue to support itself. We also pay State taxes. It is inappropriate for the State to fund this "pork." Other surrounding areas should help to fund this--if they will be using it--not only Hopkins. Tax increment funding keeps our taxes higher than other cities around us. It is not free. • The Council meetings we see on cable are totally one-sided--no resident input is allowed!!!! We want tax pavina businesses in Hopkins!!! We object to having to p have to pay for this!!� Page 4 • I think we should use the money for other things such as getting rid of the dump of the . . . . . . . . In the end it will cost way more . . . . . . . . . like the ice palace. � This survey was damaged when returned by.the post office, so some of the word- ing in the comment was missing. • I think the city is doing what they always do--not listening to the right people--doing the wrong thing then they will try to react. No I don't think they know what they're doing. • A truly honest cost to tax payers--which has not come forth yet. Really and truly the whole process stinks--what it really shows is a total disregard for the residential areas. It is my contention that we have a downtown Council not a Hopkins Citv CounciL • Arts facility on Mainstreet is a good idea. City, state, tenants, public should be/will be actively involved in funding. I would like to see the city's amount increased to $2 or $2.5 million. • I do not want to pay for this ever in taxes! The city already owns too much! • Approve it enthusiastically. • Perhaps questions for the information meetings: 1. What are the possible � extremes--if the City of Hopkins owns it, and it does really well, or really poorly? 2. How will the architect be decided upon? I think it's a swinging out, audacious proposal for the future of Hopkins' development. I applaud those who made it. • I feel our taxes are � to hiah. Bring more commercial property so our taxes can go down. • Don't feel it necessary! You say tax payers won't pay--but then you say it may cost $1 to $20 per homeowner. • I fail to see the need! Spend some of the money to update the Eisenhower building. Forget the Suburban Chev lot. • We are very much in favor of the proposed arts facility. We feel it will be of great benefit to the Hopkins community. • Parking, traffic, cost to tax payers. Seniors cannot stand more taxes--$1-$20 here and $1-$20 there--it all adds up! Please stay out of development business. Also, fund raising is very costly professionally. • More frequent information. "Tax increment financing will not affect our current tax • Page 5 levy" ... not quite true. If not using these monies, our tax levies could actually be ' � reduced??? • 1 think it is a fantastic idea. With arts not being supported as much by our schools due to tack of funds, the community needs to help where ever they can. I work at Orchestra Hall as the Events and Facilities Manager. My staff includes the Special Events Manager, rental administrator, head ushers, bartenders, stage door guards and part-time staff of 150. Can I help? Please let me know. I would love to get involved. • I think there are other things we need in Hopkins--not an art facility. We need some store to go shopping at--like for women's clothing--dime store and men's clothing stores--where are they??? No use going to any of these meetings--this is all ready in process--the community has it all taken care of. The City of Hopkins people don't have much say in Hopkins. • We do not feel adequately informed but we are more informed than a lot of people. The reception area is not something to come for. It is important to have fo�d for art openings, receptions, but this does not require a large space or to have a big production made of it. • We've heard all we can stand. Between City Hall, community center and the � schools there are plenty facilities for the act�vities listed below. The proposed facility will not be profitable. If this goes through, it will only show that we voted wrong. Hopkins should get out of the real estate business. What's the use--you've already made up your minds on this issue. • Why does the City of Hopkins want to spend $3.5 million on a building as this? Think of the interest on that kind of money. I myself on a fixed income cannot afford higher taxes than I already am paying. We have a lovely children's theater up at Eisenhower, and as for as having concerts, music performances, etc.., why not use the beautiful schools which we've all been paying for for many years. Take the ice arena pavillion- just used by a select few people--there's not been one thing there that I could go to--in fact, I've never been inside the building. Is that serving the public? What's happened to the nice small town of Hopkins?? If it has to be--please put it up for a vote at a general election. There are too many arts facilities in our surrounding area to make this profitable. Others are having a hard time making it. What makes you think this $3.5 million facility will be any different??? It's nuts-- • I am originally from St. Paul and have lived in Hopkins almost two years. I love this town because of its size. I think an arts facility would be very beneficiaL • 1 do not think this arts facility is necessary. � Page 6 • I believe this notice coupled with my attendance at the town meeting should be sufficient. I would like to see modern dance, step, jazz dance classes available as � well as art classes. I think it's a good idea, great investment for other residents of Hopkins. Keep it user friendlv, cultural friendly. I would take dance classes there if ballet isn't the only dance taught. I would take art classes provided they were offered. • Good idea. • At one point I read about having art classes at the art facility? I think Hopkins needs this facility--it would be a great addition to our community!! • As a theater professional, and teacher, (and parent!), I'm very excited about the prospect of this type of facility for amateurs, the young, and professionals in the arts. It will be a real shot in the arm for the Hopkins area! • I think it sounds wondertul! What an opportunity to bring culture to our community and to inspire the artistic interest of our young and old alike. • How will existing facilities fit the need of the proposed tenants? A non-smoking facility? The community, even the government, has good reasons to support the arts. In contrast to sporting events, arts activities bring the community together in a non-competitive manner. Sporting events are receiving way too much emphasis. • Seniors on fixed incomes need tax relief. This facilit will ultimatel increase our � Y Y taxes. • Do not want this kind of facility in Hopkins. There is not a need for this. We need something in this location that will make money not cost Hopkins taxpayers money. • I think an arts facility in Hopkins is a great idea and I like to see Hopkins grow and expand: I work for Hopkins Early Learning Center and we would attend child oriented productions for field trips for 4 and 5 year olds. • Hopkins needs a face-lift and more things to do. This is a start. • The current tax levy isn't affected you state. But tomorrow is the future. How about future tax levy? Does this eliminate the theaters at the high schools? I don't like the money the city always pays out. It's always more than anticipated--income is always less. • I will listen to N and hear February 27 meeting. I think it sounds like a good thing--so far. • Why don't we spend the money on simply getting the druggies out of Hop-o (can't � Page 7 read this word) #hru a grandiose project? Q • It's an excellent idea. Will revitalize Ho kins. Like more recent scaled-down p , plan--more economically feasible. Thanks to everyone who has worked so hard on this! • I think it's a great idea! • Your numbers vary a lot!!! Your short $1.5 million and want to do fund raising? What if you don't get that money? How about investing in education and tax relief. It it made financial sense let private business do it on their own!!! � What is going to be done about the awful condition of Shady Oak Road? Will traffic increase? Is this an idea to replace the movi� theater/restaurant complex proposed? • 1 think this is not for Hopkins. What's wrong with what we have at Eisenhower? Everything new that starts here goes belly up in no time at all. Let's stay a small town. • More facts. What if it goes in the hole 5, 10 years from now. Pretty expensive � building to sit empty. Others have failed and sit empty that had great expectations. � Can Hopkins a small town at heart truly support this facility. Is it the right fit for the �� demographics of our community now and 5 years from now? � � � • NO ARTS FACILITY • You say taxes will go up $1-$20 on a$95,000 home. Can you be a little more accurate. I think this could be a great asset to the community. • Our taxes are high enough concrete evidence that the expenditure necessary to ; get things off the ground is going to pay off in the end. Why do you think this � venture can succeed? There are other theaters in the area. Our population has a � big portion of it in transient apartment dwellers. We need a decent restaurant and = competition in the grocery business. � • The City of Hopkins should not be in the real estate building business, gives the impression of a City owned community under Council control. Good or bad? = Knock down the dome--stop wasting our money!! � • The city should stay out of the real estate business: How many people are really _ interested in ARTS etc. They must be the young bloods. - • GREAT FOR HOPKINS. GROWTH FOR US. _ � Page 8 • Spending $3.5 million and $200,000 for upkeep seems a bit steep to bring in 100,000 bodies. This is a blue collar town that, in my opinion, does not need nor � want a facility of this type. (I have lived here for 50 years.) • This newsletter combined with informational meetings is a good start! I think Hopkins, our "home town" should strongly support this imaae rising facilityf We have enou h pawn shops thrift stores and tattoo parlors, et^. Thank you. • We believe the present tax climate is anti-residents, and the constant property taxes is "shocking and alarming" for all people on fixed income. Adding the risk of city involvement both in time, money and guarantees are far beyond what we anticipated moving to Hopkins in 1976. My property tax now exceeds my mortgage payment. The city can't fix pot holes, or get snow and ice off the streets yet you continue to push program� we don't need in a town of 15,000 40% of whom are renters. We are against the project. • Poor idea--City of Hopkins should � be in the business of owning real estate. • That we do not need. This you say it won't cost the tax payers--but in the end it always does. I do not believe it will help the community ar the business places. • Every public building requires some tax increase. That's a g.iven. $10-$20 would be in my arena. � • I think that Hopkins needs more cultural facilities. • FORGET ALL THIS JUNK--LOWER OUR TAXES. I WILL VOTE AGAINST ANY COUNCILMEN WHO VOTES FOR THIS. • Need to know how to help! I can get others to help also� Let's all get behind this! Hopkins can do it! For instance I can get the 150 member Minneapolis Sweet Adelines to give a concert (Free to us) to raise funds! Jeanne and I could arrange concerts to raise monev! I can even get my Aquatennial gang behind this! I was born, raised and lived in Hopkins most of my life--have always been a pianist and piano teacher. I am vitally interested in the proposed art center. We can't o0 wrono in brinaina in culture - music, art, dancing, theater, etc. Let's give people especialtv children the opportunity to prow Our souls need the stimulation of all facets of art. Anythinq I can do! And I am a doer! Chuck, Fran and Karen all know me. Jeanne Jeffords and I both former Hopkins Sr. Queens--now Minneapolis Aquatennial Sr. Queens could probably put on talent programs to stimulate interest and funds, etc. • It's a wonderful idea, but I don't think Hopkins property owners should pay any additional tax for it. Our tax is high enough. � Page 9 • I think that an arts facility is a wonder#ul idea that can only strengthen the sense of � community in Hopkins and benefit area businesses and in the long run raise property values, if it is successful. • I vote Yes! We need this in Hopkins! • 1. Put out a referendum first for all to vote on. 2. Should not waste T{F on this. 3. Should not consider taking 3 homes on 12th for parking. 4. Use Hopkins I residents taxes for better things to help us. 5. Strongly oppose this. • Where does the City $1.5 miUion come from? !s it money that can be invested to expand the economic base of Hopkins? Are any leases signed? Any letters of intent? Why the reference to tax increment financing? If the facility is owned by the City, how can it generate TIF returns? Is Minnetonka involved in this venture? i Does the School District commitment speak for the Minnetonka portion of the ; District? Any major guaranteed corporate support for this venture? If not, public � subsidies are certain. Simply check the experience of the Minneapolis Chifdrens Theater Company, If you are really interested in diversity, why not work witn the CTC? These are premature questions. The primary question is how do you pay for the initial investmetn--how do you guarantee payment for operating expenses? What are your alternative uses for the $1.5 million? What return would it generate? Where are the proposed activities now taking place? Will their transfer have adverse impact on revenues of other public agencies? (such as community . Q services of the School District, etc.). Has a professionally-based feasibility study been conducted? This is a nice idea, but I fear it will be a continuing cost for the City. Are we "wishing" here, or asking for financiai support? f'm unwilling to pledge financia� support at this time. • Will there be a parking fee? If prices are more than $15.00, then performances would be beyond my senior budget. My retirement income has not increased like prices at State, Orpheum and Ordway. • f am not interested in a proposed arts faciiity. • Think it's a great idea to revitalize the area and provide positive entertainment options. • I think „ N�' „ • My husband and i think this would be a great improvement from the days of our youth, when the town had a very small band shell and one beer joint after another on Mainstreet. (Not that we don't like beer and a good party!) • More about fund raising activities and parking. Any effort that supports the free � expression of people through art is positive. All forms should be encouraged. I Page 10 � am prepared to support any activities of my fellow/sister citizens of Hopkins. • Based on certain assumptions, i.e:, prospective tenants have been identified, and I� they have expressed both enthusiasm for the project and a commitment to it. + This brochure summariz-ed the issues succinctly. This brochure is well done; I hope the survey helps. 1 am glad to see movement from talking to constructive action. Anymore studies, surveys, or other such functions may quite well "sour" me on the project. • Were the residents asked if this is what they want? What kind of fund raiser that wiil raise $1.5 million? Do vou honestfy think this will bring business to Hopkins? How many renters are you assured of? Will the Mayor and Council members help pay for this project so it does not fall on the taxpayers? • Did the residents want this? If so, how many? Your figures don't add up. Where wiil you get the other $1.5 million? What if you don't get renters? What kind of fund raisers? t think it stinks!!! • What a tremendously wonderful idea! !t's something to look forward to involving my children in. . .indefinitely! • This is another idea from people on our Council and Mayor that shows how stupid they are. Why not work as hard to get new industry. People that want arts for � their children should pay for it themselves not the taxpayer. Get some industry and get people work and then Hopkins may be able to have some good restaurants again. • What facilities are availabie now without building this proposed one? Concerns I have are: noise pollution (cars and people), air pollution from additional traffic and additional numbers of people who could give us concern for safefy of the people and property of Citigables. Why must "Business" always be the reason for doing a project in Hopkins? • Think this subject has been debated long enough--let's do something. It should be located on Suburban Chevrolet site. We particularly need it for our youth--the future of Hopkins. • It could positively change the image of Hopkins. • I think this is a terrific opportunity. It wiil bring lots of folks into Hopkins, greatly impraving economic opportunities, entertainment options and perception of our town by outsiders. It would be a shame to not move ahead. • As far as it goes. 1 feel the City should set a deadline for the arts fund raisers ta � Page 11 come up with the $1.5 million. Once that is achieved we should inform the public it � will cost someone an additional $80,000 per year tax raise. If the City owns the building it will be hard to raise outside capital vs. a private arts owned building. • I strongly support this endeavor. • I think a visual arts gallery would be an important addition to our community, allowing Hopkins residents of all ages to display their work. • Non-affordable--only excessive spending ploy. Retaining now too many staff--a � burden on residents--home owners. Put property to retail--non City owned--sell. _ • 1. Need much more detail on the basis for the rental income guesses. 2. Do you = have any commitments by potential renters? 3. What sort of companies or groups - would rent? Need details on how operating costs were calculated. The idea is _ nice, but the financial projections seem much too speculative and sanguine. I = suspect the additional taxes will end up double or triple the amounts given in your - bulletin! - • How will this compete for finance with the proposed move theater/resaturant concept? No tax payer money. Fee based usage based memberships--tickets, etc. Tour buses coming to us would be ideal � • The people are still slated to pay much too much of the cost. There would not be enough parking place. • I thought that site was going to be retail, restaurant and theater. • I think an art center is long overdue in a town like Hopkins. I'm pleased to see this brochure and hope you get a great response. • I think that arts facility should stay at Eisenhower. It would not benefit Hopkins at all. Hopkins residents are paying high taxes already. We don't need anymore. • I'm all for it--a wonderful addition to the Hopkins community. • Raise rents or take out of Cities development fund but don't expect the homeowners to bail you out. Its very hard living week to week with both spouses working now. • Waste of $3.5 million. • I think this is a waste of time and money--there is much culture for children and adults--and as a taxpayer I choose not to pay for everyone else'S entertainment. � This hits my pocketbook and I am tired of paying for everyone to live. Page 12 • After reading this, yes (I am informed). Before this publication, no. Can the fund � raising campaign raise $1.5 million. What happens when they only raise a portion of the $'! .5 million. • The case has not been made that ihis is the best use for that property or available funds. Given the fact that Hopkins sits in the heart of one of the richest and diverse arts areas in the country ! fai! to see how this facility will serve more than a few, many of these persons non-residents or compete with all that is available in the metropolitan area. This morning my wife and I went to a coffee concert of the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra at the Ordway in St. Paul--driving time 20 minutes. Most of the time we attend their concerts at the Woodale Church--5 minutes south of Hopkins. From my garage to the Guthrie, Orchestra Hall and the Walker, Weisman and Minneapolis Institut� ot Arts 20 minutes. We attend concerts from the opera to new age music and support the arts in ..... with our season ticket purchases and contributions. I fail to see how an arts center in Hopkins can either contribute to the community or compete for funds with the numerous worthy under funded arts agencies of this area As a City staff member I worked on the campaign which resulted in the construc- tion of the City HaIL I was responsible for planning the Hopkins Public Library and securing the federal funds which resulted in its construction. This was in the 1960's. My family has lived in Hopkins since 1970. Other Points � Parking--The fact thaf no parking study has been done until this late in the proc- ess brings to question the quality of planning which has taken place. Property values--What real impact wiii the increase of property values or adjacent properties have on City revenues. Operating levy--Given all of the above pressing needs for our property tax dollars I would object to underwriting the operationa( short falls of the proposed art center. Thank you for this opportunity to comment. • Please proceed • If an area large enough for banquets and meeting is not included in the pians, then the City needs to rethink the use of our tax dollars. The only piace now usable is Minnetonka Community Center. • It is not the proper role of the federal, state or local governments to gef invofved in � Page 13 supporting the arts. If a projeet cannot garner enough support for the private � sector to build it, then that project is too risky for any local government to be subsidizing or supporting. • This was very c{ear information. My only uncertainty is how this arts center wouid meet with the proposed cinema. Were the two ever going to be combined? • Great idea. 1 love the theater arts and currentiy go outside of the city to attend produ�tions. I would definitely attend if it was to take place in Hopkins. • What other uses for the property are being considered? We would like to know what ha ened to the movie theater that was roposed to occupy the property. PP p We afso feel the city is becoming too involved in what shouid be private enter rise such as commercial land development. P , • We like the idea a great deal. As a Hopkins resident with finro pre-school children, I'm excited about functions we can attend as a family and that my children can participate in. It will make a special community even better but don't let downtown fose its small town feei!! • This was a very informative newsletter. I appreciate being kept up to date on this project. I am in total support of the arts facility and look forward to its opening. �i • Too risky. • Anything to improve the community I am for--in the long run it increases the value of my home. • If the movie theater, which can appeal to a wide range of interests, couldn't survive; why would this somewhat narrower appeal, attract enough customers to be financially self supporting? I would like for Hopkins to make it a financially independent reality. • We'd love to see it happen. • The City of Hopkins should not own the facility. It should be owned by a company, group of people or a person, not the City. The City should not be involved in the operating cost. I do not want my taxes increased by $1.00 to $50.00 a year to pay for operating cost. • Will this facility be built for sure? Yes build it. A lot of people of all ages will benefit. Make sure that people of all ages can have the opportunity to be in stage plays. Make sure it's tive theater to give us a break from movies and N. � • Don't try to make it serve too many purposes. Build it specia( need (i.e. children). Page 14 • Good idea. � • Let's see some action please! • I think it wouid be a real asset to the cammunity. • Forget it--the City of Hopkins should stay out of the real estate business. • I don't think Hopkins should own or manage the building. It's okay to give a grant towards the facility and quite another to cover any fund short faN from activities. • I think this is a great investment in the future of downtown Hopkins, and will revitalize Mainstreet. • I Jove the updates in the Hopkins paper--keep them coming. Very informative and update. Please contact me! I'd love to become involved. • I would like to see a multi use building with various size meeting rooms and an adequate cater kitchen for groups up to 200. � We do now after receiving this speciaf publication, up to then we did not know what went on at an arts facility. � • A better idea of the yearly operating expense Hopkins homeowners are expected to pay. No tax money should be spent. If it is self supporting the original contribution might be acceptable, but not yearly ope� ating costs. • Great for downtown businesses. What's good for them is good for everyone in keeping taxes down for residential. • Why wasn't this questionnaire sent to us before you went ahead with this project? I do not approve of this project. If the city owns the property will it then be tax exempt? If so, how can you use TIF? Estimated operating costs are over the income received. How will you be able to replace capital? No parking facilities. • An assurance of no raise in taxes. I am an 81 year old owner of a condo. My taxes have raised almost double from 1990 to 1996. My income has lowered in the same period. I can no afford any more. • Of anybody once to build and art center or any else should pay for it not the City of Hopkins. We need a grocery store much more. I have lived here over 60 years. 1 have allways shoped at Hovenders and Taits and that would help Hopkins more, than and art center and remove that awful roof. . � Page 15 • It is a great idea. � • We need a lar er, more com lete, roce store than we need an arts center. Quit 9 P 9 rY dragging your feet on this. We feel no public money should be involved in this. The tenants that are in the building should be able to cover the costs of upkeep and taxes and no taxes should be levied to cover this. What will be the effe�t of the school districts involvement in this on our taxes? • A lot of theaters have noisy doors. I just hope we have quiet (soundless) doors that can be opened during a production without distracting everyone. • We are against a performing arts facility because they attract homosexuals. � Check out the Guthrie Theater, etc. We abhore homosexuality because not only is � it irnorroll, repulsive, repugnant, sick but it is the burning down of family values. � Remember Mapelthorpe a few years ago? Need I say more?� � = • 1 have seen my propepity taxes on my house triple (thats right 300%)! in the 10 = years I have lived in Hopkins. Every Henn County, School Districf, City of Hopkins = meeting in regards to this obcene rise in taxes I have attended never explains � fairle� and raitionally w�h � this is happening! Use the site and old White Motor site � to bring real jobs and tax base to Hopkins! Q � 1 don't need any more! I believe these things are always built too large. Start small--maybe increase. $3 million is a lot of money. This all would probably be _ o.k. if it was started with Childs Theatre--dance--Just start with one or two things _ and add if needed. • I think that this project should have moved ahead along time ago. The City needs a theater and a good restaurant. It would also be nice to get the Childs Play Co. into a bigger facility. • It sounds like a c r� idea! It would create more revenue and draw people to Hopkins. • 1 am a sculptor that has taught at St. Stephen's school and Trinity College from Hartford, Conn, in Rome--Need teachers? I thought a retail/movie complex was going in there?!?!? • It is a very nice idea. I feel concerned most about traffic and parking. Hopkins is congested already. ..people do not obey speed limit on thoroughfares. � • Fantastic idea, long overdue. I would be interested to know about the possibility of rehearsal space to encourage young artists in creative growth. � • I would like to attend the meetings and hear the information first hand. I believe Page 16 that this project along with the movie theater is a great opportunity for Hopkins and its residents. � • What assurance do we have that the tenants will be able to pay the proposed rent ($132,400)? Where does the city get the $1.5 million? Who will subscribe to the "Fund Raiser" --where will they come from? We don't feel this facility is needed!! • Wouldn't this be an excellent place for the Hopkins Historical Society to be housed? What expasure for the history of Hopkins if that many people are expected to come into the facility. I hope your reception area wil! handle 200 people seated, with a catering kitchen. • Is the Suburban Chev site definite? Where is this? Please tell me more about the parking and traffic flow. What are �he repercussions of the City of Hopkins not � being owners of this art center'? i will probably rarely, if ever, visit the arts facility. • Don Rosener tries to speak for Hopkins residents but keep in mind he doesn't represent everyone. He wasn't elected►+ Keep it to an affordable size with no banquet facilities. Keep it ciose to downtown core to attract peaple. • It sounds Iike someone got on there high horse and only an arts facility could be built. If you were to build the largest mini golf course for instance it would benefit more local business people and residents. Big mistake, there is very few people who would actually benefit from this facility. Just the cost in promoting such a # facility would leave the taxpayers with an ongoing burden, get reel find a use a higher percent can benefit from. • I need to know how amateurs can create the arts and get recognition for their work without the expense of becoming a tenant, etc. 1. An arts center will not only enrich the community, it will be there for other communities, etc. 2. Needs to be predominantly familv oriented (nonetheless sophisticated). 3. Wiil art, dance, music, film making lessons be affordable to lower income families? Film making! Film making! Film making! Why have you apparently forgotten this art form? We have young people into the art in Hopkins. Please don't ignore them. • I think Hopkins needs a facility like this. I believe people will attend well if the programs are varied enough to appeal to most everyone at one time or another. • Who will benefit from it? Why can't the Eisenhower theaterfacility continue to be used? • I like the proposaL � Build it! � Page 17 • I am in favor of this proposal. However, t feel that we may be trying to do it on "the � cheap." My suggesti�n is that staff and Council should be sure that they're asking for enough $ to do it ri ht. $3 million does not seem like enough. • As much as I can understand--I promote the project to those who have the knowledge to do so. Great! As l am a Sr. citizen and chose Hopkins as my retirement community in 1978 would attend these "arts" and movies more often. Location is also great. • As a senior citizen, 1 do not want the city spending my tax $ on this. It shoufd be I �� privately funded!! Or picking up the tab when it fails! � • No affect to taxpayers • I think its a great idea and an admirable projectf • I think this is a great idea and am looking forward to having it in Hopkins and i feel this will be great for local business owners in Hopkins as wel1. • Build it simple. Build it now. "Famify Art Center." • I think the ART CENTER wi11 be a great addition to Hopkins. We have a lot of smal{ children in this town who will be inffuer�ced in a good way. � • But {'m fair{y new to the area. I'm not familiar with what else is around to know what is needed in our area. The arts are extremely important to me and to many others who don't even realize their own talent. Will underpriviledge receive help to use the facilities? • Hopkins needs this let's not lose the momentum►. • I strongiy support it! 1t will make art, crafts and entertainment available to residents of all ages. It will help create a critical mass and be a big boost for economic development in the downtown area and entire city. It will enhance the image of Hopkins. • Anticipated rental income is low, like Canterbury Downs, more of my tax money will be used for Maryann's Dance School and a theatre used by few, when the inevitable shortfiall occurs. Why don't you "elected officials" take the 3.5 million and fix the pot holes? • Keep costs to us that buy tickets low or too many Hopkins residents can't afford to use and attend activities in this arts facility. � • We think its a great idea Not only bring in new business for Hopkins, but we feel Page 18 it will also increase the desire for young families to move in. • it is a great idea--if money is available � + I fhink they're should be more industry so our taxes will go down. Period. I wouldn't come period. I'm not interested. • t think it is a wonderfui idea. I believe it would benefit all ages, from senior to youngsters. A place where people could go for fun, relaxation, gather information and boost creativity. • There is a need for this type of theater in town. • Big government can't do everything for every "brain storm" idea someone has. 1. Building this facility reduces property tax on the site, and will increase to all property owners in Hopkins. 2. Less than 10% of Hopkins will use this site. 3. 400% of property in Hopkins wilt increase. Let private capital perform any of the above. • How many ways could this building attract more economic development to the Hopkins area. Even if speculative. How does this facility compare to other arts facilities in the metro area? Will there be the ability to inlarge this facility if needed in the future if needed? � • Good work. We like the ideas, good communication. • Please do not build this facility. If there is a true nee�, some developer will know about it and make it a profitable venture, plus pay real estate taxes. • My concern is--if this facility is not self supporting--are the tax payers going to be expected to foot the bill as happens so often--such as was threatened with the Target Center and now a new stadium in Minneapolis. I have a real problem with under pinning the wealthy. My suggestion to bring downtown Hopkins alive again is to make it a 50th and France or a Stillwater. You have a start with the neat bakery on Mainstreet. If you add the theater concept, I'm sure other shops would settle here. You also have some antique shops. Hopkins could be an interesting town. • Will the leasing of the facility be solely to the city's partners, or will other tenants also lease? Why can't the operating costs be identified? Also, it is more important to lay out a marketing plan that ensures viability rather than tell the taxpayers what you'll do if you have an expense shortfall. Thanks for the opportunity to give my input. If you need volunteers, please contact me. � Page 19 • I think this is a 4reat opportunity for the City of Hopkins and all city residents to � bring a much needed revitalization to the city. It's tirr�e to move past the pawn shops and tattoo parlors and begin to enrich our city. • Don't want the City to supplement any monies for this project! • The information is complete but I'd still like to know more about the working spaces. I am unable to attend either meeting. However, I'd like to help any way I can. I'm the costume shop manager at the Guthrie Theater and available to help any way I can! WE NEED THIS! • Info on age groups targeted for its use, types of uses envisioned for the facility. I'm all for a performing arts facility, but l would also like to see other arts housed � there--classrooms and studios for drawing and painting, writing groups and � classes, sculpture, pottery--keep it as inclusive as possible for all ranges of interests. Q � PERSOiJS ATTENDING ARTS FACILITY INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS: Elfreada Addy Doris Sweet Dot Munson 151 Eighth Av. S., #217 151 Eighth Av. S., #217 215 - 12th Av. N. Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 � Firmus Opitr Betty Deutsch Mike Miller 315 Monroe Av. N. 929 - 11 th Av. S., Apt. 7 112 Maple Hill Road Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Len Powell Eunice Andren Julie Renner 225 Blake Road South 32 - 11 th Av. S, #313 1105 Trailwood Norfh Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 = Muriel Ryan Gary Shelton Janet Perbix Hood � 114 - 20th Av. N. 1412 take Street N.E. 318 - 11 th Av. N. - Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Pierre & Nancy Dussol David Smith Misty Thompson 5 Mill Road 130 Holly Road 640 Oak Ridge Road, #225 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 � Hanlon Colin Mackenzie K aren Marx 1019 Mainstreet 301 Sweetbriar Lane 218 Althea Lane Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN �5343 Sue Kempe Sid Blair D. G. Duffy Bren 301 Eighth Av. N. 525 East Park Valley Drive 626 Park Valley Drive West . Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Rick Brausen Connie Schanno Tom Hessel 47 - 20th Av. N. 1239 Landmark Trail South 13125 April Lane Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Kathy Rolf Herbert Gibbs Nelson Berg 425 Wayside Road 704 Old Settlers Trail 904 Mainstreet, #330 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 � n Roesner Bill Gullickson Kate Kinnich 8 Pa�lc Valley Drive West 109 Interlachen Road 353 Campbell Drive Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 , Steve Barberio Ted Sauer pouglas Dahlberg 402 - 12th Av. N. Hopkins School Dist. 270 425 Madison Av. N. Hopkins, MN 55343 1001 Highway 7 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55305-4723 � 2/27 mtg. above —3/3 mtg. Bemice Myhre Jim Shirley starts at right-did not repeat 706 Drillane Road South 323 - 11 th Av. N. names on 3/3 if attended before Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Marge Young Dale Brower Karen Christenson 313 Farmdate Road West 154 Meadowbrook Road 1119 Trailwood Norfh Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Priscilla Bloom Michelle Cossetta Wendy Wegner 1 Fletche� Place 97 Blake Road N., #232 101 Blake Road N., # 107 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 David Simpson Karen & Ja}�n Legenhausen Billee Kraut 8� gutch Johnson 725 N.E. Lake Street, #323 126 Sixth Av. N. 5750 Shady Oak Road Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Ronnie Behmen Warren Behmen Mike 8� Terry Jacobson '� 624 Fifth Av. S. 624 Fifth Av. S. 233 Shady Oak Road Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Harry Heim Joe Barry (Joe Barry from 2/27 mtg.) 1053] Cedar Lake Road 134 - 11 th Av. S. Minnetonka, MN 55343 Hopkins, MN 55343 Ed Stiele jmylabel\ infomtg.I � NOTES ON ARTS FACILITY INFOFtMATIONAL MEETINGS � 2/27/96 Meeting FINANCE Doug Dahlberg, 425 Madison Av. N. Q: Of the 5132,500, how much revenue comes from each of the four tenants? Joe Barry, 134 - llth Av. S. C: ... Rea11y terrific idea--great opportunity for City. � Q: Why are you talking about being at a break-even point or even � � a short fa11, when we could make a profit? Firmus Opitz, 315 Monroe Av. N. = Q: There was nothing about tax money to date in the brochure (staff time, 6, 000 studies, etc. ) How much tax money has been _ spent? Was the property purchased with tax money? Colin Mackenzie 301 Sweetbriar Lane Q Q: Regarding fundraising, are you currently leaning toward no construction until a significant portion of the money needed from fundraising is raised? If so, what portion of the money? Eunice Andren Citigables, 32 - llth Av. S, #313 C: I am a longtime resident, piano teacher, vitally interested in bringing the arts facility to Hopkins. I have many ideas for fundraising. The Sweet Adelines would put o� a concert. I wi11 work to raise money. I would like to congratulate the mayor . o. PARKING No comments or questions. ELEMENTS/USES Mike Miller 112 Maple Hill Road Q: I have heard several options--are we leaving anything out? Have you thought of futvre uses in case the tenants don't stay forever? Duffy Bren 626 Park Valley Drive West C: We have all the facilit�es we need already in Yopkins--VFW � ha11s, American Legions, churches, Elks :.. PS/AATSMTG . � NOTES ON ARTS FACILITY INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS - Page 2 Sue Kempe 301 Eighth Av. N. C: I like the idea that community is doir_g it together in a � constructi ve way--very good idea. Q: Are there other communities that have done this? What have we learned from other communities in our area? Muriel Ryan, 114 - 20th Av. N. C: I am a member of HAAA. � visited other projects with five or six others--a11 said their facilities were staffed by vo1 unteers in part and said the facilities wer_e always filled--fee1 it wi11 be valuable to the community. Karen Jensen Council member C: I am most proud of this prvject because �t is rich in collaborative initiative. We got the State grant because the project was so fu11 of initiative and brought in youth and others. Steve Barberio Child's Play Theater, 402 - 12th Av. N. C: The synergy in the tenant group is truly exciting. There is a wide range of opportunity for this community. Colin Mackenzie 301 Sweetbriar Lane Q: I assume there'll be an auditorium--what wi11 the seating � capacity be? Why is Eisenhower no longer good for Chi1d's P1ay Theater--besides air conditioning? Doug Dahlberg, 425 Madison Av. N. Q: Wi11 the new facility be air conditioned? BENEFITS Herb Gibbs Meadow Creek Apartments, 704 Old Settlers Trail Q: A 750-seat auditorium cvi11 be magnificent, I'm sure, but it's something you watch. How wi11 young people--all citizens--benefit besides sitting there? Misty Thompson, 640 Oak Ridge Road, #225 Q: Wi11 it ha ve dance classrooms? I understand Minnetonka Ba11et--that's nice--but how about jazz, tap, etc., dance from other countries? Janet Perbix Hood 318 - 11th Av. N. Q: I am concerned with safety. I wouldn't put my car in the ramp--not safe. Will there be surveillance on llth and 12th avenues? � PS/ARTSMTG . . � � � NOTES ON ARTS FACILITY INFORMP,TIONAL MEETZNGS - Page 3 Nelson Berg, 904 Mainstreet, #330 - � C: I am involved with the tenants group and wauld like to comment on the benefits: • Economic benefits--will create critical mass (bringing people into downtown} • Increase viability of overall community • Develop identity of caring about youth and community L n Minnetonka ril a e Tom Hessel President of HAAA, 13125 Ap , C: I am very involved in Hopkins. Th.is should be not just a I , building, but a facility creating potential and opportunity for the community. It wi11 be whatever we make it. We have many artists waiting to use this facility. I Mike Miller 112 Maple Hill Road Q: What wi11 Council do with this meeting's information? OTHER Herb Gibbs Meadow Creek Apartments, 704 Old Settlers Trail Q: Where wi11 buses be put when the 750-seat theater is fil.Ied with school children? Don Roesner 628 Valley Park Driv� P�:est � C: I'm a we11-informed citizen who has attended a Iot of meetings and talked to residents. There is a 1ot of support thus far. I just want to remember fiscal responsibility. Just hope a11 can be worked out. Thank you, Mr. Mielke. Doug Dahlberg, 425 Madison Av. N. Q: Is the potential levy high up for solving shortfall problem or 1ow on the list? Duffy Bren, 626 Park Valley Drive West Q: On the financial aspect of performing arts, newspapers say very few projects of this type are financially sound. Endowments are reducing. I dovbt to beat the band whether they could collect one nickel from Cargill. Eisenhower might be small, but can the City afford this? We are highest taxed in area--higher than Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, etc. Ed Hanlon Boston Garden restaurant C: Regarding benefits- (in Hopkins) is small--square footage is small. If we are not proacti vely nurturing culture, other businesses wi11 come in. This (facility) is utilizing area in a very positive way. � PS/ARTSMTG . NOTES ON ARTS FACILITY INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS - Page 4 Rick Brausen 47 - 20th Av. N. C: Culture--we have established entity willing to go in. A � state-of-the-art facility will create memories for xesidents, youth. I remember playing baseball and what it meant to have a state-of-the-art facility. Art is about soul. Joe Barry, 134 - llth Av. S. Q: Who wi11 select the architect for the facility? Eunice Andren, Citigables C: I note the concern about safety. I've 1i ved fi ve and a half years across from the ramp. We've once had youngsters roller blading--once playing ba11 in the ramp--that's a11. Steve Barberio, Child's Play Theater, 4Q2 - 12th Av. N. C: Noted "We Love Our Kids" campaign. Not all kids excel in sports. Theater is another area in which to excel. Regarding safety--the best way to help that issue is to create self-esteem in kids and motivate them. Don Roesner, 618 Park Valley Drive West C: Don't rule out creative ways of financing. Use more TIF money--anything not to tax residents more. Use Hennepin County money. Betty Deutsch, 929 - 11th Av. S., Apt. 7 � Q: Is there a time frame for fundraising? Mis�y Thompson, 640 Oak Ridge Road, #225 C: Attend the March 5 caucuses. C: $I.5 million sounds Iike a Iot, but it's an investinent in kids. The performing arts are like the chord on a harp, once touched, they create a 1ovely rr�elody. 3/3/96 Meeting FINANCE Priscilla Bloom, Bellgrove, 1 Fletcher Place Q: Who is financing? Where from- private funds? PARKING Mike Jacobson, 233 Shady 0ak Road Q: How many spaces are necessary? Are they a11 in the ramp? � PS/AATSMTG � NOTES ON ARTS FACILITY INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS - Page 5 ELEMENTS/USES � Dal Br w r 154 Meadowbrook Road e o e , Q: Wi11 there be opportunities for other major tenants to use ' the facility? Wi11 there be opportunity to expand the bui�ding? Priscilla Bloom Bellgrove, 1 Fletcher Place Q: So, who are the tenants? Terry Jacobson, 233 Shady Oak Road Q: I'm glad to hear others wi11 be able to use the facility. WiZ1 there be rooms for community use--for non paid use, for � � instance, one day a week? i i ' Kathy Rolf, 425 Wayside Road C: I hope that we would be socially responsible and that the venture would have an inclusive nature for a11 those functionally challenged in any way. I wou.Zd Iike to hear that intention stated. Fran Hesch Council member C: This is why it has taken this length of time to build--because we've been trying to be inclusive. Thank yov, Kathy, for your comments. � Dale Brower 154 Meadowbrook Road Q: Wi11 there be an opportunity for painting, sculpture sttadios, etc. ? � BENE FI TS Jim Shirley, 323 - 11th Av. N. C: One benefit is subtle. Hopkins is aging and, thus, economic development is difficult. This element wi?1 permit us to maintain livability standards that wi11 be advantageous to Hopkins. At this time we have three pieces together--the dance studio, Chi1d's Play Theater and the School District, and the HAAA--it would be hard to get this opportunity back if it is lost. Wendy Wegner, 101 Blake Road N., #107 C: I lived in Mankato and saw that community make a comeback with a ri verside development. This is very interesting to me. I can tell you that the benefits outweigh the struggles involved. � PS/ARTSMTG � NOTES ON ARTS FACILITY INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS - Page 6 Steve Barberio Child's Play Theater C: The collaboxation of the proposed tenants is unique--to have � four separate entities in strong collaboration is very unusual. The potential is great. Priscilla Bloom Bellgrove, 1 Fletcher Place Q: Do people involved get paid (the tenants, such as Chi1d's P1 ay) ? (After Steve Mielke answered, Donna Leviton Adu1t Education for School District, spoke about the School District's potentzal use of the facility and use of their paid staff.) OTHER Harry Heim, 10531 Cedar Lake Road, Minnetonka Q: What's the time frame? Karen Jensen Council member C: Te11 about the fundraising committee. Terry Jacobson 233 5hady Oak Road C: Thank you to all that have been involved in the planning stage. When you're at a point to need help from the commvnity--whether financial or time--I'd certainly like to give � four or five hours a week. � PS/AATSMTG � � �