Loading...
HRA 10-03 Adoption of Revised Procurement Policy Q G1TY QF NOPKINS January 28, 2010 HRA Report 2010-03 � ' , ` 2010 ADOPTION OF REVISED PROCUREMENT POLICY Proaosed Action Staff recommends adoption of the following motion: Adopt Resolution 467, authorizinq HRA Chair and Executive Director to re'vise and implement-the procurement policy. �' With approval of this motion, the HRA Board, Exeautive 'Director, and Public Housing Manager will begin utilizing fhe new policy with all future procurement activities.' : ; Overview The HRA was notified shortly after the passage of the 2009"American Recovery and Reinvestment Assistance Act that further requirements will be enforeed in relation to � �` : procurement procedures. Following written guidance and an on-site review on ' January 21, 2010, by the Jocal HUD office, we are now being asked to adopt a mo,re `stringenfi, detailed procurement policy; The previous Procurement or Purchasing Policy was last revised in 2002 and is not in compliance with various federaf and state laws and regulations. ",,�; � Primarv Issues ta Consider HUD has provided us with a very short timefine to write, review and-adopt a new , procurement policy. Failure to do so may result in possible sanctions and loss of funds for capital funding in the future. The recommended policy will replace existing policy.i � � �: which lacked sufficient detail for continued federal#unding. Supportina Information • HRA Resolution 467 ` • Procurement Policy � Alternatives : , ; The HRA has the following alternatives regarding this issue: :� 1. Approve the action as recommended by sfaff. ' 2. Continue for further information. There is the possibility #hat`delay in adoption will result in sanctions. - ` � ^ . � Stacy Unowsky; Public Housing Manager ' • HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 467 RESOLUTION FOR APPROVAL OF REVISED PROCUREMENT POLICY FOR HOPKINS HRA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOPKINS HRA OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, that the revised Procurement Policy be approved and implemented as directed. Adopted by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority In and Foc the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, this 1 day of February 2010. � By Eugene J. Maxwell, HRA Board Chair ATTEST: Executive Director . PROCUREMENT POLICY ' HOPHINS HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ' (2/1/10) � This Procurement Policy complies with the Annual Contributions Contract (ACC) between Hopkins Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and the HUD, Federal Regulations at 24 CFR 85.36, the procurement standards of the Procurement Handbook for PHAs, HUD Handbook 7460.8, Rev 2, and applicable State and Local laws. GENERAL PROVISIONS General The HRA shall: provide for a procurement system of quality and integrity; provide for the fair and equitable treatment of all persons or firms involved in purchasing by the HRA; ensure that supplies and services (including construction) are procured efficiently, effectively, and at the most favorable prices available to the HRA; promote competition in contracting; and assure that � HRA purchasing actions are in full compliance with applicable Federal standards, HUD regulations, State, and local laws. Application i' ; This Procurement Policy applies to all procurement actions of the Authority, regardless of the j, source of funds, except as noted under "exclusions," below. However, nothing in this Policy shall prevent the HRA from complying with the terms and conditions of any grant, contract, gift � or bequest that is otherwise consistent with the law. When both HUD and non-Federal grant °.� ' funds are used for a project, the work to be accomplished with the funds should be separately identified prior to procurement so that appropriate requirements can be applied, if necessary. If it is not possible to separate the funds, HUD procurement regulations shall be applied to the total project. If funds and work can be separated and work can be completed by a new contract, then regulations applicable to the source of funding may be followed. Definition The tertn "procurement," as used in this Policy, includes the procuring, purchasing, leasing, or renting of: (1) goods, supplies, equipment, and materials, (2) construction and maintenance; consultant services, (3) Architectural and Engineering (A/E) sexvices, (4) Social Services, and (5) other services. Exclusions This policy does not govern administrative fees earned or non-program income, e.g., Fee-for- service revenue under 24 CFR Part 990. These excluded areas are subject to applicable State and local requirements. This policy does not govern procurements of good and services conducted on behalf of the HRA for projects funded for economic development purposes. Those ' � � procurements shall follow the adopted City of Hopkins procurement policy. �' Changes in Laws and Regulations In the event an applicable law or regulation is modified or eliminated, or a new law or regulation ����� is adopted, the revised law or regulation shall, to the extent inconsistent with these Policies, � automatically supersede these Policies. 07/2009 1 -- - - � -- - - , - -- - _ Public Access to Procurement Information � Most procurement information that is not proprietary is a matter of public record and shall be available to the public to the extent provided in the Minnesota Freedom of Information Act. ETHICS IN PUBLIC CONTRACTING General The HRA hereby establishes this code of conduct regarding procurement issues and actions and shall implement a system of sanctions for violations. This code of conduct, etc., is consistent with applicable Federal, State, or local law. Conflicts of Interest No employee, officer, Board member; or agent of the HRA shall participate directly or indirectly in the selection, award, or administration of any contract if a conflict of interest, either real or apparent, would be involved. This type of conflict would be when one of the persons listed below has a financial or any other type of interest in a firm competing for the award: A. An employee, officer, Board member, or agent involved in making the award; B. His/her relative (including father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in- law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, or half sister); � C. His/her partner; or D. An organization which employs or is negotiating to employ, or has an arrangement concerning prospective employment of any of the above. Gratuities, Kickbacks, and Use of Confidential Information No officer, employee, Board member, or agent shall ask for or accept gratuities, favors, or items of more than $25 in value from any contractor, potential contractor, or party to any subcontract, and shall not knowingly use confidential information for actual or anticipated personal gain. Prohibition Against Contingent Fees Contractors wanting to do business with the HRA must not hire a person to solicit or secure a contract for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, except for bona fide established commercial selling agencies. � 07/2009 2 i . I - i Procurement Planning � � !� Planning is essential to managing the procurement function properly. Hence, the HRA will � � periodically review its record of prior purchases, as well as future needs, to: find patterns of :' � procurement actions that could be performed more efficiently or economically; maximize � ; competition and competitive pricing among contracts and decrease the HRA's procurement ' costs; reduce HRA administrative costs; ensure that supplies and services are obtained without any need for re-procurement, e.g., resolving bid protests; and minimize errors that occur when � there is inadequate lead time. Consideration should be given to storage, security, and handling ; requirements when planning the most appropriate purchasing actions. PURCHASING METHODS 4 ;'. , I Petty Cash Purchases �' Purchases under $20 may be handled through the use of a petty cash account. Petty Cash Accounts may be established in an amount sufficient to cover small purchases made during a i' reasonable period, e.g., one month. For all Petty Cash Accounts, the HItA shall ensure that � security is maintained and only authorized individuals have access to the account. These i accounts should be reconciled and replenished periodically. I i t Small Purchase Procedures I � : For any amounts above the Petty Cash ceiling, but not exceeding $100,000, the HRA may use � small purchase procedures. Under small purchase procedures, the HRA shall obtain a reasonable number of quotes (preferably three); however, for purchases of less than $2,000, also known as 3 � Micro Purchases, only one quote is required provided the quote is considered reasonable. To the � � greatest extent feasible, and to promote competition, small purchases should be distributed � among qualified sources. Quotes may be obtained orally (either in person or by phone), by fax, � in writing, or through e-procurement. Award shall be made to the qualified vendor that provides the best value to the HRA. If award is to be made for reasons other than lowest price, � documentation shall be provided in the contract file. The HRA shall not break down � requirements aggregating more than the small purchase threshold (or the Micro Purchase threshold) into several purchases that are less than the applicable threshold merely to: (1) permit � use of the small purchase procedures or (2) avoid any requirements that applies to purchases that exceed the Micro Purchase threshold. Sealed Bids Sealed bidding shall be used for a11 contracts that exceed the small purchase threshold and that are not competitive proposals or non-competitive proposals, as these terms are defined in this document. Under sealed bids, the PHA publicly solicits bids and awards a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and conditions of the IFB, is the lowest in price. Sealed bidding is the preferred method for procuring construction, supply, and non-complex service contracts that are expected to exceed $100,000. I � € E ; 4 � 07/2009 3 � � � , , .. :. .... .. .. ... -- -- - -- - - - - _ ,-- -- - - - �,. ., - - A. Conditions for Using Sealed Bids. HRA shall use the sealed bid method if the following � conditions are present: a complete, adequate, and realistic statement of work, specification, or purchase description is available; two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the work; the contract can be awarded based on a firm fixed price; and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the lowest price. B. Solicitation and Receipt of Bids. An IFB is issued which includes the specifications and all contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement, and a statement that award will be made to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder whose bid meets the requirements of the solicitation. The IFB must state the time and place for both receiving the bids and the public bid opening. All bids received will be date and time-stamped and stored unopened in a secure place until the public bid opening. A bidder may withdraw the bid at any time prior to the bid opening. C. Bid Opening and Award. Bids shall be opened publicly. All bids received shall be recorded on an tabulation of bids, and then made available for public inspection. If equal low bids are received from responsible bidders, selection shall be made by drawing lots or other similar random method. The method for doing this shall be stated in the IFB. If only one responsive bid is received from a responsible bidder, award shall not be made unless the price can be determined to be reasonable, based on a cost or price analysis. D. Mistakes in Bids. Correction or withdrawal of bids may be permitted, where appropriate, before bid opening by written notice received in the office designated in the IFB prior to the time set for bid opening. After bid opening, corrections in bids may be permitted only if the � bidder can show by clear and convincing evidence that a mistake of a nonjudgmental character was made, the nature of the mistake, and the bid price actually intended. A low bidder alleging a nonjudgmental mistake may be permitted to withdraw its bid if the mistake is clearly evident on the face of the bid document but the intended bid is unclear or the bidder submits convincing evidence that a mistake was made. All decisions to allow correction or withdrawal of a bid shall be supported by a written determination signed by the Contracting Officer. After bid opening, changes in bid prices or other provisions of bids prejudicial to the interest of the HRA or fair competition shall not be permitted. Competitive Proposals Unlike sealed bidding, the competitive proposal method permits: consideration of technical factors other than price; discussion with offerors concerning offers submitted; negotiation of contract price or estimated cost and other contract terms and conditions; revision of proposals before the final contractor selection; and the withdrawal of an offer at any time up until the point of award. Award is normally made on the basis of the proposal that represents the best overall value to the PHA, considering price and other factors, e.g., technical expertise, past experience, quality of proposed staffing, etc., set forth in the solicitation and not solely the lowest price. A. Conditions for Use. Where conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bidding, competitive proposals may be used. Competitive proposals are the preferred method for procuring professional services that will exceed the small purchase threshold. � 07/2009 4 i - � B. Form of Solicitation. Other than A/E services, competitive proposals shall be solicited i through the issuance of a RFP. The RFP shall clearly identify the importance and relative value of each of the evaluation factors as well as any subfactors and price. A mechanism for u � ° fairly and thoroughly evaluating the technical and price proposals shall be established before •; the solicitation is issued. Proposals shall be handled so as to prevent disclosure of the number ! of offerors, identity of the offerors, and the contents of their proposals until after award. The � HRA may assign price a specific weight in the evaluation criteria or the HRA may consider i price in conjunction with technical factors; in either case, the method for evaluating price � shall be established in the RFP. � � C. Evaluation. The proposals shall be evaluated onlv on the criteria stated in the RFP. Where � not apparent from the evaluation criteria, the HRA shall establish an Evaluation Plan for � each RFP. Generally, all RFPs shall be evaluated by an appropriately appointed Evaluation i Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall be required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and to sign a Non-Disclosure statement. An Evaluation Report, summarizing the i results of the evaluation, shall be prepared prior to award of a contract. � D. Negotiations. Negotiations shall be conducted with all offerors who submit a proposal i determined to have a reasonable chance of being selected for award, unless it is determined � that negotiations are not needed with any of the offerors. This determination is based on the � relative score of the proposals as they are evaluated and rated in accordance with the � technical and price factors specified in the RFP. These offerors shall be treated fairly and 6 equally with respect to any opportunity for negotiation and revision of their proposals. No offeror shall be given any information about any other offeror's proposal, and no offeror shall be assisted in bringing its proposal up to the level of any other proposal. A common � deadline shall be established for receipt of proposal revisions based on negotiations. Negotiations are exchanges (in either competitive or sole source environment) between the PHA and offerors that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the offeror to revise its proposal. These negotiations may include bargaining. Bargaining includes persuasion, alteration of assumptions and positions, give-and-take, and may apply to price, schedule, � technical requirements, type of contract or other terms of a proposed contract. When '' negotiations are conducted in a competitive acquisition, they take place after establishment of 4 the competitive range and are called discussions. Discussions are tailored to each offeror's ;'; proposal, and shall be conducted by the contracting officer with each offeror within the 4 competitive range. The primary object of discussions is to maximize the HItA's ability to ' obtain best value, based on the requirements and the evaluation factors set forth in the ; solicitation. The contracting officer shall indicate to, or discuss with, each offeror still being � considered for award, significant weaknesses, deficiencies, and other aspects of its proposal j' (such as cost, price; technical approach, past performance, and terms and conditions) that i' could, in the opinion of the contracting officer, be altered or explained to enhance materially i' the proposer's potential for award. The scope and extent of discussions axe a matter of the ; contracting officer's judgment. The contracting officer may inform an offeror that its price is �' considered by the PHA to be too high, or too low, and reveal the results of the analysis supporting that conclusion. It is also permissible to indicate to all offerors the cost or price that the government's price analysis, market research, and other reviews have identified as reasonable. "Auctioning" (revealing one offeror's price in an attempt to get another offeror to ; lower their price) is prohibited. �' � 07/2009 5 �' ; I i , - -- - -- _ - --- ; _ , -- - -- - E. Award. After evaluation of the revised proposals, if any, the contract shall be awarded to the � responsible firm whose technical approach to the project, qualifications, price andlor any other factors considered, are most advantageous to the HItA provided that the price is within the maximum total project budgeted amount established for the specific property or activity. F. A/E Services. The HRA must contract for A/E services using Qualification Based Selection procedures, utilizing a RFQ. Sealed bidding shall not be used for A/E solicitations. Under QBS procedures, competitors' qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified competitor is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. Price is not used as a selection factor under this method. QBS procedures shall not be used to purchase other types of services, though architectural/engineering firrns axe potential sources. Noncompetitive Proposals A. Conditions for Use. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals (sole-source) may be used onlv when the award of a contract is not feasible using small purchase procedures, sealed bids, cooperative purchasing, or competitive proposals, and if one of the following applies: 1. The item is available only from a single source, based on a good faith review of available sources; 2. An emergency exists that seriously threatens the public health, welfare, or safety, or endangers property, or would otherwise cause serious injury to the HRA, as may arise by reason of a flood, earthquake, epidemic, riot, equipment failure, or similar event. In such cases, there must be an immediate and serious need for supplies, services, or construction such that the need cannot be met through any of the other procurement methods, and the � emergency procurement shall be limited to those supplies, services, or construction necessary simply to meet the emergency; 3. HUD authorizes the use of noncompetitive proposals; or 4. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. B. Justification. Each procurement based on noncompetitive proposals shall be supported by a written justification for the selection of this method. The justification shall be approved in writing by the responsible Contracting Officer. The justification, to be included in the procurement file, should include the following information: 1. Description of the requirement; 2. History of prior purchases and their nature (competitive vs. noncompetitive); 3. The specific exception in 24 CFR 85.36(d)(4)(i)(A) through (D) which applies; 4. Statement as to the unique circumstances that require award by noncompetitive proposals; 5. Description of the efforts made to find competitive sources (advertisement in trade journals or local publications, phone calls to local suppliers, issuance of a written solicitation, etc.); 6. Statement as to efforts that will be taken in the future to promote competition for the • requirement; 7. Signature by the Contracting Officer's supervisor (or someone above the level of the Contracting Officer); and 07/2009 6 i � 8. Price Reasonableness. The reasonableness of the price for all procurements based on noncompetitive proposals shall be determined by performing an analysis, as described in this Policy. � Cooperative Purchasing/Intergovernmental Agreements I � The HRA may enter into State and/or local cooperative or intergovernmental agreements to j purchase or use common supplies, equipment, or services. The decision to use an interagency I agreement instead of conducting a direct procurement shall be based on economy and efficiency. If used, the interagency agreement shall stipulate who is authorized to purchase on behalf of the i participating parties and shall specify inspection, acceptance, termination, payment, and other relevant terms and conditions. The HRA may use Federal or State excess and surplus property i instead of purchasing new equipment and property if feasible and if it will result in a reduction of i project costs. The goods and services obtained under a cooperative purchasing agreement must � have been procured in accordance with 24 CFR 85.36. � Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) i For all purchases above the Micro Purchase threshold, the HRA shall prepare an ICE prior to i solicitation. The level of detail shall be commensurate with the cost and complexity of the item to be purchased. I Cost and Price Analysis I The HRA shall require assurance that, before entering into a contract, the price is reasonable, in I accordance with the following instructions. , � Petty Cash and Micro Purchases � � No formal cost or price analysis is required. Rather, the execution of a contract by the I Contracting Officer (through a Purchase Order or other means) shall serve as the Contracting ( Officer's determination that the price obtained is reasonable, which may be based on the Contracting Officer's prior experience or other factors. I Small Purchases � � A comparison with other offers shall generally be sufficient determination of the reasonableness i of price and no further analysis is required. If a reasonable number of quotes is not obtained to � establish reasonableness through price competition, the Contracting Officer shall document price I reasonableness through other means, such as prior purchases of this nature, catalog prices, the � Contracting Officer's personal knowledge at the time of purchase, comparison to the ICE, or any � other reasonable basis. , Sealed Bids � The presence of adequate competition should generally be sufficient to establish price reasonableness. Where sufficient bids are not received, and when the bid received is substantially more than the ICE, and where the HRA cannot reasonably determine price reasonableness, the HRA must conduct a cost analysis, consistent with federal guidelines, to ensure that the price paid is reasonable. � 07/2009 � I'. , - - --- -- .�.. ,,.. - -- , . .. , Competitive Proposals � The presence of adequate competition should generally be sufficient to establish price reasonableness. Where sufficient bids are not received, the HRA must compare the price with the ICE. For competitive proposals where prices cannot be easily compared among offerors, where there is not adequate competition, or where the price is substantially greater than the ICE, the HRA must conduct a cost analysis, consistent with Federal guidelines, to ensure that the price paid is reasonable. Contract Modifications A cost analysis, consistent with federal guidelines, shall be conducted for all contract modifications for projects that were procured through Sealed Bids, Competitive Proposals, or Non-Competitive Proposals, or for projects originally procured through Small Purchase procedures and the amount of the contract modification will result in a total contract price in excess of $100,000. SOLICITATION AND ADVERTISING Method of Solicitation A. Petty Cash and Micro Purchases. The HRA may contact only one source if the price is considered reasonable. B. Small Purchases. Written quotes may be solicited, through fax, or by any other reasonable • method. C. Sealed Bids and Competitive Proposals. Solicitation must be done publicly. The HRA must use one or more following solicitation methods, provided that the method employed provides for meaningful competition. 1. Advertising in newspapers or other print mediums including our local paper of record The Sun Sailor. 2. Advertising in various trade journals or publications (for construction). 3. E-Procurement. The HRA may conduct its public procurements through the Internet using e-procurement systems. However, all e-procurements must otherwise be in compliance with 24 CFR 85.36, State and local requirements, and the Authority's procurement policy. Time Frame For purchases of more than $100,000, the public notice should run once each week for two consecutive weeks. Form Notices/advertisements should state, at a minimum, the place, date, and time that the bids or proposals are due, the solicitation number, a contact who can provide a copy of, and information about, the solicitation, and a brief description of the needed items(s). • 07/2009 g i � Time Period for Submission of Bids � A minimum of 15 days shall generally be provided for preparation and submission of sealed bids ���� I and 10 days for competitive proposals. However, the Executive Director may allow for a shorter � � period under extraordinary circumstances. ( i Cancellation of Solicitations A. An IFB, RFP, or other solicitation may be cancelled before bids/offers are due if: 1. The supplies, services or construction is no longer required; I 2. The funds are no longer available; � 3. Proposed amendments to the solicitation are of such magnitude that a new solicitation would be best; or i 4. Other similar reasons. � B. A solicitation may be cancelled and all bids or proposals that have already been received may � be rejected if: 1. The supplies or services (including construction) are no longer required; 2. Ambiguous or otherwise inadequate specifications were part of the solicitation; 3. All factors of significance to the HRA were not considered; 4. Prices exceed available funds and it would not be appropriate to adjust quantities to come � within available funds; 5. There is reason to believe that bids or proposals may not have been independently determined in open competition, may have been collusive, or may have been submitted in � bad faith; or �I � 6. For good cause of a similar nature when it is in the best interest of the HRA. j i C. The reasons for cancellation shall be documented in the procurement file and the reasons for cancellation and/or rejection shall be provided upon request. ! D. A notice of cancellation shall be sent to all bidders/offerors solicited and, if appropriate, shall ' explain that they will be given an opportunity to compete on any resolicitation or future procurement of similar items. ' E. If all otherwise acceptable bids received in response to an IFB are at unreasonable prices an analysis should be conducted to see if there is a problem in either the specifications or the HRA's cost estimate. If both are determined adequate and if only one bid is received and the price is unreasonable, the Contracting Officer may cancel the solicitation and either 1. Re-solicit using an RFP; or 2. Complete the procurement by using the competitive proposal method. The Contracting Officer must determine, in writing, that such action is appropriate, must inform all bidders of the HRA's intent to negotiate, and must give each bidder a reasonable � opportunity to negotiate. 07/2009 9 --- - - -- - -- - - - --- - - -- — - _ :_.,.,. . . . ,..: � �: �. _ ,. ,. ,., F. If problems are found with the specifications, HRA should cancel the solicitation, revise the � specifications and resolicit using an IFB. Credit (or Purchasing) Cards Credit card usage should follow the rules for all other small purchases. For example, the Contracting Officer may use a credit card for Micro Purchases without obtaining additional quotes provided the price is considered reasonable. However, for amounts above the Micro Purchase level, the Contracting Officer would generally need to have obtained a reasonable number of quotes or note emergency nature of purchase before purchasing via a credit card. When using credit cards, the HRA should adopt reasonable safeguards to assure that they are used only for intended purposes (for instance, limiting the types of purchases or the amount of purchases that are permitted with credit cards). Bonding Requirements The standards under this section apply to construction contracts that exceed $100,000. There axe no bonding requirements for small purchases or for competitive proposals. The HRA may require bonds in these latter circumstances when deemed appropriate; however, non-construction contracts should generally not require bid bonds. A. Bid Bonds. For construction contracts exceeding $100,000, offerors shall be required to submit a bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to 5% of the bid price. . B. Payment Bonds. For construction contracts exceeding $100,000, the successful bidder shall furnish an assurance of completion. This assurance may be any one of the following four: 1. A performance and payment bond in a penal sum of 100% of the contract price; or 2. Separate performance and payment bonds, each for 50 % or more of the contract price; or 3. A 20 % cash escrow; or 4. A 25 % irrevocable letter of credit. C. These bonds must be obtained from guarantee or surety co.mpanies acceptable to the U. S. Government and authorized to do business in the State where the work is to be performed. Individual sureties shall not be considered. U. S. Treasury Circular Number 570 lists companies approved to act as sureties on bonds securing Government contracts, the maximum underwriting limits on each contract bonded, and the States in which the company is licensed to do business. Use of companies on this circular is mandatory. CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS AND DUTIES Contractor Responsibility HRA shall not award any contract until the prospective contractor, i.e., low responsive bidder, or successful offeror, has been determined to be responsible. A responsible bidder/offeror must: • A. Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them; 07/2009 10 i - � � l i B. Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking ' into consideration all the bidder's/offeror's existing commercial and governmental business ' commitments; � ' C. Have a satisfactory performance record; � D. Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics; E. Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them; F. Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them; and, G. Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations, including not be suspended, debarred or under a HUD-imposed LDP. If a prospective contractor is found to be non-responsible, a written determination of non- responsibility shall be prepared and included in the official contract file, and the prospective � contractor shall be advised of the reasons for the determination. Suspension and Debarment Contracts shall not be awarded to debarred, suspended, or ineligible contractors. Contractors may be suspended, debarred, or determined to be ineligible by HUD in accordance with HUD regulations (24 CFR Part 24) or by other Federal agencies, e.g., Dept of Labor for violation of labor regulations, when necessary to protect housing authorities in their business dealings. � Vendor Lists All interested businesses shall be given the opportunity to be included on vendor mailing lists if the HRA is maintaining such a list. Any lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in the purchase of supplies and services (including construction) shall be kept current and include enough sources to ensure competition. CONTRACT PRICING ARRANGEMENTS Contract Types Any type of contract which is appropriate to the procurement and which will promote the best interests of the HRA may be used, provided the cost -plus-a-percentage-of-cost and percentage-of-construction-cost methods are not used. All solicitations and contracts shall e the clauses and rovisions necess to define the ri hts and res onsibilities of both the includ p �'y g P contractor and HRA. � For all cost reimbursement contracts, HRA must include a written determination as to why no other contract type is suitable. Further, the contract must include a ceiling price that the � contractor exceeds at its own risk. Options Options for additional quantities or performance periods may be included in contracts, provided � that: 07/2009 11 - - ---- -- - - .,,. .. . .. :.� : . : - i . ., : � i ;:, . ..:..;:: A. The option is contained in the solicitation; � B. The option is a unilateral right of the Authority; C. The contract states a limit on the additional quantities and the overall term of the contract; D. The options are evaluated as part of the initial competition; E. The contract states the period within which the options may be exercised; F. The options may be exercised only at the price specified in or reasonably determinable from the contract; and G. The options may be exercised only if determined to be more advantageous to HRA than conducting a new procurement. Contract Clauses All contracts should identify the contract pricing arrangement as well as other pertinent terms and conditions, as determined by the HRA. Additionally, the forms HUD-5369, 5369-A, 5369-B, 5369, 5370, 5370-C, and 51915-A , which contain all HUD-required clauses and certifications for contracts of more than $100,000, as well as any forms/clauses as required by HUD for small purchases, shall be used in all corresponding solicitations and contracts issued by this Authority. The HRA shall select which forms are appropriate for each procurement or purchasing action and utilize forms as needed. • CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION The HRA shall maintain a system of contract administration designed to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with their contracts. These systems shall provide for inspection of supplies, services, or construction, as well as monitoring contractor performance, status reporting on major projects including construction contracts, and similar matters. For cost-reimbursement contracts, costs are allowable only to the extent that they are consistent with the cost principles in HUD Handbook 2210.18. SPECIFICATIONS Genera� All specifications shall be drafted so as to promote overall economy for the purpose intended and to encourage competition in satisfying HRA needs. Specifications shall be reviewed prior to issuing any solicitation to ensure that they are not unduly restrictive or represent unnecessary or duplicative items. Function or performance specifications are preferred. Detailed product specifications shall be avoided whenever possible. Consideration shall be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. For equipment purchases, a lease versus purchase analysis should be performed to determine the most economical form of procurement. � Limitation The following types of specifications shall be avoided: 07/2009 12 �, A. geographic restrictions not mandated or encouraged by applicable Federal law (except for A/Econtracts, which may include geographic location as a selection factor if adequate competition is available); , F;; B. brand name specifications (unless the specifications list the minimum essential chaxacteristics and standards to which the item must conform to satisfy its intended use). Nothing in this procurement policy sha11 preempt any State licensing laws. Specifications shall be reviewed to ensure that organizational conflicts of interest do not occur. � I TERMINATIONS Termination Notices ; The Contracting Officer shall terminate contracts for convenience or default only by a written notice to the contractor. The notice shall be sent by certified mail with a return receipt requested. The notice shall state, at a minimum, the following: �, 1. The contract is being terminated for default or for the convenience of the HRA under the ; cited contract clause authorizing the termination; � ! 2. Whether the contract is terminated in whole or in part (for partial terminations, identify the specific items being terminated); 3. If terminated for default, the acts or omissions constituting the default, the Contracting Officer's determination that failure to perform is not excusable, the HRA's rights to charge excess costs of re-procurement to the contractor, and the contractor's appeal � rights; � 4. The effective date of termination; i � 5. The contractor's right to proceed under the non-terminated portion of the contract; 6. Any special instructions; and 7. Copies of the notice should be sent to the contractor's surety, if any, and any assignee. TerminaHon for Convenience ' Contracts may be terminated for convenience when the HRA no longer needs or desires the supplies or services under contract or can no longer fund the procurement. 1. Settlement. Settlement of contracts terminated for convenience may be settled through negotiations or by a unilateral determination of the Contracting Officer. The contractor � should submit a settlement proposal promptly to the Contracting Officer for any amounts claimed as a result of the termination. Whenever possible, the Contracting Officer should negotiate a fair and prompt settlement with the contractor and should settle by deterrnination only when mutual agreement cannot be reached. � 07/2009 13 , -- , ::. , - ,_., . - _ • - -- ___, _ - - -- - 2. Compensation. A settlement should compensate the contractor fairly for work • performed, for other costs incurred under the contract, and for preparations made for the terminated portions of the contract, including a reasonable allowance for profit. However, no profit shall be allowed on settlement expenses. In addition, the Contracting Officer shall not allow profit if it appears that the contractor would have incurred a loss had the entire contract been completed. Fair compensation is a matter of judgment and cannot be measured exactly. The Contracting Officer should use prudent business judgment in the settlement process, as opposed to strict accounting principles. The parties may agree to a total amount to be paid to the contractor without agreeing on individual cost items or profit. Termination for Default A contract may be terminated for default because of the contractor's actual or anticipated failure to perform its contractual obligations. Under a termination for default, the HRA is not liable for the contractor's costs on undelivered work and may be entitled to the repayment of progress payments. If the contractor fails to make progress so as to endanger performance of the contract, the Contracting Officer should issue a written notice to the contractor (generally called a"Cure Notice") specifying the failure and providing a period of 10 days (or longer period if needed) in which to ":cure" the failure. After the 10 days, the Contracting Officer may issue a notice of termination for default, unless the failure to perform has been cured. 1. Notice. If the contractor has failed to perform work within the required time and a termination for default appears appropriate, the Contracting Officer should, if practicable, • notify the contractor in writing of the possibility of the termination. This notice shall call the contractor's attention to the contractual liabilities if the contract is terminated for default, and request the contractor to "show cause" why the contract should not be terminated. If the response to this "show cause" notice is inadequate or insufficient, ' action is taken in response to it; the contract should then be terminated for default. 2. Alternatives to Termination. Alternatives to termination for default include the � following (at the HRA's discretion): allow alternative dispute resolution (arbitration or ! mediation) as agreed to by both parties; allow the contractor or the surety to continue � performance of the contract under a revised delivery schedule (in exchange for a reduced price or other consideration); permit the contractor to continue performance of the " contract by means of a subcontract or other business arrangement with an acceptable i third party, provided the rights of the HRA are adequately protected; or, if the contractor ; is not liable to the HRA for damages, execute a no-cost termination settlement � agreement. � _ 3. Repurchase. When the supplies, services, or construction activities are still required after termination, the Contracting Officer should seek to contract for the same or similar items as soon as possible. The Contracting Officer may use any appropriate contracting method for the procurement (sealed bids or competitive or noncompetitive proposals, as appropriate), provided competition is solicited to the maximum extent practicable to secure the lowest price obtainable under the circumstances in order to mitigate damages. . 07/2009 14 APPEALS AND REMEDIES ; General ��' It is HRA policy to resolve all contractual issues informally and without litigation. Disputes will not be referred to HUD unless all administrative remedies have been exhausted. When appropriate, a mediator may be used to help resolve differences. Informal Appeals Procedure I ; The HRA shall adopt an inforr�ial bid protest/appeal procedure for contracts of $100,000 or less. �'' Under these procedures, the bidder/contractor may request to meet with the appropriate Contract Officer. � Formal Appeals Procedure � I A formal appeals procedure shall be established for solicitations/contracts of more than $100,000. A. Bid Protest. Any actual or prospective contractor may protest the soiicitation or award of a contract for serious violations of the principles of this Policy. Any protest against a solicitation must be received before the due date for the receipt of bids or proposals, and any � protest against the award of a contract must be received within ten (10) calendar days after the contract receives notice of the contract award, or the protest will not be considered. All bid protests shall be in writing, submitted to the Contracting Officer or designee, who shall issue a written decision on the matter. The Contracting Officer may, at his/her discretion, suspend the procurement pending resolution of the protest if the facts presented so warrant. � B. Contractor Claims. AlI claims by a contractor relating to performance of a contract shall be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer for a written decision. The contractor may request a conference on the claim. The Contracting Officer's decision shall inform the contractor of its appeal rights to the next higher level of authority in HRA. Contractor claims � shall be governed by the Changes clause in the form HUD-5370. � ASSISTANCE TO SMALL AND OTHER BUSINESSES ,� i j Required Efforts , Consistent with Presidential Executive Orders 11625, 12138, and 12432, and Section 3 of the HUD Act of 1968, ai1 feasible efforts shall be made to ensure that small and minority-owned ', ; businesses, women's business enterprises, and other individuals or firms located in or owned in i substantial part by persons residing in the area of the HRA. project are used when possible. Such efforts shall include, but shall not be limited to: A. Including such firms, when qualified, on solicitation mailing lists; B. Encouraging their participation through direct solicitation of bids or proposals whenever they are potential sources; C. Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to � permit m�imum participation by such firms; � i 07/2009 15 � - - - - - _ _ - - - - ---- -- :�,..,�., ..�. .. -- ;° -_ •° - .,_:� °� _ __ � . ... . � ,.:.. D. Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage . participation by such firms; E. Using the services and assistance of the Small Business Administration, and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; F. Including in contracts, to the greatest extent feasible, a clause requiring contractors, to provide opportunities for training and ennployment for lower income residents of the project area and to award subcontracts for work in connection with the project to business concerns which provide opportunities to low-income residents, as described in 24 CFR Part 135 (so- called Section 3 businesses); and G. Requiring prime contractors, when subcontracting is anticipated, to take the positive steps listed above. Goals shall be established periodically for participation by small businesses, minority-owned businesses, women-owned business enterprises, labor surplus area businesses, and Section 3 business concerns. Definitions 1. A small business is defined as a business that is: independently owned; not dominant in its field of operation; and not an affiliate or subsidiary of a business dominant in its field of operation. The size standaxds in 13 CFR Part 121 should be used to determine business size. • 2. A minority-owned business is defined as a business which is at least 51 % owned by one or more m�nority group members; or, in the case of a publicly-owned business, one in which at least 51 % of its voting stock is owned by one or more minority group members, and whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more such individuals. Minority group members include, but axe not limited to Black Americans, Hispanic Americans; Native Americans, Asian Pacific Americans, Asian Indian Americans, and Hasidic Jewish Americans. . 3. A women's bnsiness enterprise is defined as a business that is at least 51% owned by a woman or women who are U.S. citizens and who control and operate the business. 4. A"Section 3 business concern" is as defined under 24 CFR Part 135. 5. A labor surplus area business is defined as a business which, together with its immediate subcontractors, will incur more than 50% of the cost of performing the contract in an axea of concentrated unemployment or underemployment, as defined by the DOL in 20 CFR Part 654, Subpart A, and in the list of labor surplus areas published by the Employment and Training Administration. Board Approval of Procurement Actions Other than approval of this Procurement Policy, approval by the Board of Commissioners is not required for any procurement action, as permitted under State and local law. Rather, it is the responsibility of the Public Housing Manager and Executive Director to make sure that all procurement actions are conducted in accordance with the policies contained herein. • Projects or contracts exceeding $50,000 will be presented to the HRA Board for further review, and approval prior to awarding the contract. 07/2009 � � Delegation of Contracting Authority ' While the Public Housing Manager and Executive Director are responsible for ensuring that the � , HRA's procurements comply with this Policy, the Executive Director may delegate all procurement authority as is necessary and appropriate to conduct the business of the Agency. Contracts equal to or greater than $50,000 must be executed and signed by the Executzve Director or Assistant ED. Contracts below $50,000 may be executed and signed by the Public ' Housing Manager. Further, and in accordance with this delegation of authority, the Executive Director shall, where , necessary, estabiish operational procedures (such as a procurement manual or standard operating ; procedures) to implement this Policy. The Executive Director shall also establish a system of � sanctions for violafions of the ethical standards described in Section III below, consistent with Federal, State, or local law. DOCUMENTATION The HRA must maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of each procurement I action. These records shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, the following: A. Rationale for the method of procurement (if not self-evident); B. Rationale of contract pricing arrangement (also if not self-evident); C. Reason for accepting or rejecting the bids or offers; D. Basis for the contract price (as prescribed in this handbook); � E. A copy of the contract documents awarded or issued and signed by the Contracting Officer; � F. Basis for contract modifications; and . G. Related contract administration actions. The Ievel of documentation should be commensurate with the value of the procurement. Records are to be retained for a period of three years after final payment and all matters pertaining to the contact are closed: Disposition of Surplus Property Property no longer necessary for the HRA's purposes (non-real property) shall be transferred, sold, or disposed of in accordance with applicable Federal, state, and local laws and regulations. � Funding Availability Before initiating any contract, the HRA shall ensure that there are sufficient funds available to cover the anticipated cost of the contract or modification � 07/2009 1 � - - - - - - _ _ - -- - - _ _ _-- ,- -_ - - -- -- . ..::: .. . . ... . . . :... � � Self-Certification • The HRA self-certifies that this Procurement Policy, and the HRA's procurement system, complies with all applicable Federal regulations and, as such, the HRA is exempt from prior HUD review and approval of individual procurement action. • • 07/2Q09 1 g AMENDMENT A � � Part 85 Compliance Any requirements relating to the procurement of goods and ser�ices arising under state and local laws and regulations shall not apply to Capital Fund Stimulus Grants. The PHA shall instead follow the Part 85 requirements. Section 1605 of the Recovery Act: Buy American � The Buy American requirements of section 1605 of the Recovery Act" of 2009 shall be included as a part of any solicitation and award pertaining to ARRA monies or any future funding requirement consistent with this Act. ' Section 1605 of the Recovery Act provides: ; Use of American Iron, Steel and Manufactured Goods. (a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a pubiic buiiding or � public work unless all of the iron, steel and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States. I, (b) Subsection (a) shall not apply in any case or category of cases in which the head of the Federal department or agency involved finds that: � (1) Applying subsection (a) would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) Iron, steel and the relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) Inclusion of iron, steel, and manufactured goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more �han 25 percent. i (c) If the head of a Federal department or agency determines that it is necessary to waive the application of subsection (a) based on a finding under subsection (b), the head of the department or agency shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed written justification as to why the provision is being waived. (d) This section shall be applied in a manner consistent with United States obligations under international agreements. � 07/2009 � 9 -:: � - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ..-- ......... . ... � � � . .. ...:_: . . ,. . - : -, . _ :