Council Report for May15,2007 Public Hearing on Capital Improvement Plan �?/Iay 15, 2007 Council Report 2007-053
PUBLIC HEARING FOR TAE PURPOSES OF ACCEPTING
INPUT ON THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2007-2011 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN AS IT RELATED TO THE REFUNDING
OF THE 2002 $10,760,000 HRA LEASED REVENUE BONDS
AND
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF THE CITY'S G.O. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS
IN AN AMOLTNT NOT TO EXCEED $ final available at meetin� AND
ADOPTING THE CITY OF HOPHINS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 2007-2011
� Proposed Action
To open the public hearing, accept public input on the amendment of the 2007-2011 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
as it relates to the refunding of the 2002 $10,760,000 in HRA Leased Revenue Bonds. Once public input has been
taken the public hearing will be closed and if no significant objections are heard we will proceed with adopting a
resolution giving preliminary approval for the issuance of the City's G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds and adopting
the Capital Improvement 2007-2011. Final resolution is being drafted by Kennedy and Graven and will be available
in final form at the council meeting. A draft of the resolution can be found in Appendix D of the CIP.
Overview
S Under the capital improvement program for financing acquisitions and betterments to public lands, buildings or other
improvements such as a city hall, public safety or public works facilities Minnesota Statutes now give cities the
authority to issue bonds without having to issue pure revenue bonds under a non-appropriation lease with option to
purchase agreement and without regards to an election.
The law authorizes the issuance of obligations for capital improvements if the bonds are issued under a 5-year capital
improvement plan. To qualify for this option several qualifications must be met, among which is to approve the
capital improvement plan after a public hearing and the capital improvement being financed must have a useful life of
at least 5 years.
The City issued HRA Leased Revenue Bonds u�der the lease with option to buy program in 2002 and 2003. We now
have the opportunity to refinance the 2002 bonds with significant savings to the city and the taxpayers. We are
proposing to refund $9,550,000 of the 2002 HRA Leased Revenue Bonds as a straight G.O. issue. Anticipated savings
are estimated to exceed $265,000. In addition to the interest savings additional benefits will be tax savings and debt
service payments are reduced.
In order to do the refunding we needed to amend the 2007-2011 CIP to include this project as a speci�c capital
improvement proj ect.
Suuporting Information
• Ehlers & Associates memo on the Overview of Capital Improvement Plan Bond program
• Amendment to the City's 2007-2011 CIP as it relates to the refunding of the 2002 $10,760,000 HRA Leased
� Revenue bonds
�
Christine M. Harkess, CPA, CGFM
Finance Director
�
` � � �"'"` ��`' � � CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANBONDS
a� �ss�et,�,�r�s tr�c
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 grants municipalities the authority to issue bonds without regard to election
requirements under capital improvement programs for financing acquisitions and betterments to public lands,
buildings, or other improvements used as a city hall, town hall, library, public safety, or public works facility
without having to issue pure revenue bonds under a non-appropriation lease with option to purchase agreement.
Conditions on the authority include approval of the issuance by a 3/Sths vote of the governing body membership, is
part of the capital improvement plan, public notice is provided, and is subject to reverse referendum. The authority
to issue bonds is limited to the amount of bonds that would require an annual levy for debt service that does not
exceed .16% of taxable market value of all property in the municipality. With few exceptions, municipalities with a
population of 2,500 or more are subject to net debt limits. Also, in the case of a shared facility where more than one
municipality participates, the net debt limit is allocated among the participants in proportion to their required
financial contribution.
The law authorizes issuance of obligations without an election for capital improvements, if the bonds are issued
under a 5-year capital improvement plan. To qualify for the referendum exemption, the following qualifications
must be met:
❑ The governing body must approve the capital improvement plan after a public hearing. The notice must be
published in the official newspaper at least 14 days but not more than 28 days prior to the hearing. In
. addition, the notice may be posted on the official web site. The plan must include the following:
� ✓ The specific capital improvements to be constructed;
✓ The estimated schedule, timing and details, together with the estimated cost, need for the
improvement and the sources of revenue to pay for the improvement;
✓ Any planned construction of other capital improvements in the municipality over the next five
years; and
✓ An analysis of the following eight points for each project on an individual basis and as a whole: (i)
condition of the City's infrastructure and need for the project, (ii) demand for the improvement,
(iii) cost of the improvement, (iv) availability of public resources, (v) level of overlapping debt, (vi)
cost/benefits of alternative uses of funds, (vii) operating costs of the planned improvements, and
(viii) options for shared facilities with other cities or local governments.
❑ Approval of the bond issuance must be made by a 3/Sths vote of the governing body membership.
❑ Issuance of the bonds is subject to referendum approval, if a petition signed by voters equal to 5% of the
voters in the last general election is �led with the municipal clerk within 30 days of the public hearing (if a
vote is taken and the referendum passes, the taxes would be levied on market value rather than tax
capacity).
The capital improvements must have a useful life of at least �ve years to qualify. Capital improvements do not
include light rail transit or related activities, parks, roads/bridges, administrative buildings other than city or town
halls, or lands for those facilities.
• Because the bonds may be subject to the legal debt limit, we recommend that municipalities consult their
independent public financial advisor for a complete net debt analysis before issuing this type of debt.
N:�Minnsota�MN Ciry Team\CIP.Street Reconstruct\Updated CIP.Handout.doc
�
2007 through 2011
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
May 2007
�
Prepared by:
Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
3060 Centre Pointe Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
EHLERS
� & ASSOCIATES INC
•
� Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 3
II. PURPOSE ............................................................................................ 4
III. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS .............. 5
IV. PROJECT SUMMARY ....................................................................... 6
V. FINANCING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ................... 10
PROJECT COSTS ...........................................................APPENDIX A
• PROPOSED CIP BOND ISSUES ...................................APPENDIX B
PRE-SALE SCHEDULE .................................................APPENDIX C
RESOLUTIONS/NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING......APPENDIX D
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 2
•
City of Hopkins
Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
2007 through 2011
I. INTRODUCTION
In 2003, the Minnesota State Legislature adopted a statute that generally
exempts municipal bonds issued under a capital improvement program from
the referendum requirements usually required for city halls, public works,
and public safety facilities. The 2005 Legislature added towns to, the
meaning of a municipality and towri halls and libraries to the meaning of a
capital improvement.
�
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 3
•
II. PURPOSE �
A capital improvement is a major expenditure of municipal funds for the
acquisition or betterment to public lands, buildings, or other improvements
used as a city hall, town hall, library, public safety, or public works facility,
which has a useful life of 5 years or more. For the purposes of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.521, capital improvements do not include light rail
transit or related activizies, parks, road/bridges, administrative buildings
other than city or town hall, or land for those facilities. However, this plan
includes certain additional capital improvements beyond the scope of that
statute. A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a document designed to
anticipate Capital Improvement expenditures and schedule them over a five-
year period so that they may be purchased in the most efficient and cost
effective method possible. A CIF allows the matching of expenditures with
anticipated income. As potential expenditures are reviewed, the municipality
considers the benefits, costs, alternatives and impact on operating
expenditures.
• The City of Hopkins, Minnesota. (the "City") believes the capital
improvement process is an important element of responsible fiscal
management. Major capital expenditures can be anticipated and coordinated
so as to minimize potentially adverse financial impacts caused by the timing
and magnitude of capital outlays. This coordination of capital expenditures
is important to the City in achieving its goals of adequate physical assets and
sound fiscal management. In these financially difficult times good planning
is essential for the wise use of limited financial resources.
The Capital Improvement Plan is designed to be updated on an annual basis.
In this manner, it becomes an ongoing fiscal planning tool that continually
anticipated futuxe capital expenditures and funding sources.
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 4
• III. THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING PROCESS
The capital improvement planning process is as follows; the City Council.
authorizes the preparation of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City
staff is instructed to assemble the capital expenditures to be undertaken
within the next five years. The City Council then reviews the expenditures
according to their priority, fiscal impact, and available funding. From this
information, a preliminary capital improvement plan is prepared. A public
hearing is held to solicit input from citizens and other governmental units.
Changes are made based on that input, and a final pr.oject list is established.
The City Council then prepares a plan based on the available funding
sources. If general obligation bonding is necessary, the City works with its
financial advisor to prepare a bond sale and repayment schedule. Over the
life of the CIP, once the funding, including proceeds from the bond sales
becomes available; the individual capital expenditures can be made.
In subsequent years, the process is repeated as expenditures are completed
and as new needs arise. Capital improvement planning looks five years into
• the future.
For a municipality to use its authority to finance expenditures under Section
475.521, it must meet the requirements provided therein. Specifically, the
governing body must approve the sale of capital improvement bonds by a
3/Sths majority of its membership. In addition, it must hold a public hearing
for public input. Notice of such hearing must be published in the official
newspaper of the municipality at least 14, but not more than 28 days prior to
the date of the public hearing. In addition, the notice may be posted on the
City's official web site. The governing body approves the CIP following the
public hearing.
Although a referendum is not required, a reverse referendum is allowable. If
a petition bearing the signatures of at least 5 percent of the votes cast in the
last general election requesting a vote on the issuance of bonds is received
by the municipal clerk within 30 days after the public hearing, a referendum
vote on the issuance of the bonds shall be called (if a vote is taken and the
referendum passes, the taxes would be levied on market value rather than tax
capacity). :
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 5
IV. PROJECT SUMMARY
�
The expenditures to be undertaken with this Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
are limited to those listed below. All other foreseeable capital expenditures
. within the municipal government will come through other means. The
following expenditures have been submitted for inclusion in this CIP:
2007 Exuenditures
• Refunding of the $10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds,
Series 2002A for the construction of the Public Works Facility and the
Fire Station.
2008 Expenditures
� � No expenditures anticipated with this CIP
2009 Expenditures
�
• No expenditures anticipated with this CIP
2010 Expenditures
� No expenditures anticipated with this CIP
2011Exuenditures
� No expenditures anticipated with this CIP
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 6
The statute has established certain criteria that must be met. Under these
• criteria, the City has considered the following eight points:
1. Condition of the City's infrastructure and need for the proj ect
2. Demand for the improvement
3. Cost of the improvement
4. Availability of public resources
5. Level of overlapping debt
6. Cost/benefits of alternative uses of funds
7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements
8. Options for shared facilities with other cities or local governments
The CIP is composed of projects that will provide more space for the Public
Works Department to operate and an updated fire hall that allows for storage �
of all fire apparatus, an exercise facility for fire personnel, training room and
social gathering space for fire department events. The City has analyzed the
eight points required per statute for each project on an individual basis and
as a whole. Their findings are as follows:
� PROJECTS
Conditions of City Infrastructure and Need for the Projects
Due to growth of the Public Works Department as a result of an increased
demand for services and increased fleet additional space was needed for this
department to operate efficiently. The addition on to the existing building
provided space for the storage of the city's fleet that was kept either outside
or in one of three 60+ year old outdated buildings, provides space for
maintaining those vehicles, provided improved safety conditions for those
working on the vehicles and provided space to store increased supplies of
salt.
Having an up to date fire station is critical to the public safety of area
residents. Over the years technology and methods of fighting fires has
changed resulting in the existing facility becoming outdated. The existing
space did not allow for expansion for storage of fire apparatus, training
rooms or storage of fire equipment.
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 7
Demand for Projects
�
The new Public Works addition will provide many benefits among which
are: Storage for several large pieces of Public Works equipment that had
been stored outside as there was insufficient space or they were too large to
fit through the door openings. Improved safety for maintenance staff by
allowing proper cold weather truck inspections with proper ventilation when
trucks are running. The new building is a semi-heated vehicle storage
building and improves winter efficiency and equipment reliability by
reducing wear on engines and hydraulic systems. The improved storage
facility also reduces the long-term maintenance and repair to equipment. A
larger building was also needed to store salt. The old building only stored 5-
10% salt/sand mixture. The ability to store large quantities allows us to save
costs and improves efficiency in our response to sleet/icy road conditions.
Finally, the new addition will replace three 60+ year old deteriorating
storage buildings with a single building allowing better utilization of city
property.
To better meet the needs of Hopkins citizens a new fire station was needed.
The new station provides the needed space for fire equipment, apparatus,
� training rooms, locker room facilities and a social/gathering space for
firefighters. It also is wired for the latest technology that assists in
firefighter training and reporting.
Estimated Cost of the Projects
See Project Summary for details of all project costs.
Availability of Public Resources
The public works and fire buildings are being fiinded by bond proceeds.
Level of �verlapping Debt
The City currently has no overlapping CIP debt.
Relative Costs and Benefits of Alternative Uses of the Funds
� There are no significant alternatives for funds designated for this project.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 8
Operating Costs of the Proposed �mprovements
�
The annual operating costs of the public works facility is $107,600. The
annual operating cost of the fire department totals $732,900 and includes the
operation of the building and fire department.
Options for Shared Facilities with Other Cities or Local Government
The Pubic Works facility currently houses the street, water, sewer, storm
sewer and refuse operations of the city.
The Fire Station shares the facility with the Emergency Preparedness and
Emergency Medical departments of the city.
�
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 9
� V. FINANCING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The total amount of requested expenditures under the Capital Improvement
Plan is $9,550,000. If these expenditures are to be funded, that amount of
money is anticipated to be generated through the tax levy and the sale of
$9,550,000 in bonds over the five-year period.
In the financing of the Capital Improvement Plan, two statutory limitations
apply. Under Chapter 475, with few exceptions, municipalities cannot incur
debt in excess of 2% of the assessor's taxable market value for the
municipality. In the City the TMV is $1,579,590,600. Therefore, the total_
amount of outstanding debt cannot exceed $31,591,812. As of May 1, 2007,
the City had $14,080,000 subject to the legal debt limit.
Another limitation on bonding under the Capital Improvement Plan Statute
(475.521) is that without referendum, the total amount that can be used for
principal and interest in any one year for CIP debt cannot exceed 0.16% of
the TMV for the municipality. In the City, that amount is $2,527,345
• ($1,579,590,600 x .0061).
The principal and interest payments are will remain stable over the five
years and will average $857,000.
Under the Capital Improvement Plan, the City will secure $9,550,000 in
general obligation bonds in the year 2007 to finance the refunding of the
$10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A, which
financed the Public Works Facility and the Fire Station. The par amount of
each issue is based on the amounts listed in Appendix A plus estimated
issuance costs. The proposed general obligation capital improvement bonds
(including issuance costs) are shown in Appendix B.
Continuation of the Capital Improvement Plan
This Capital Improvement Plan should be reviewed annually by the City
Council using the process outlined in this Plan. It should review proposed
expenditures, make priority decisions, and seek funding for those
expenditures it deems necessary for the City. If deemed appropriate, the
Council should prepare an update to this Plan.
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 10
• The future road work described in this Plan might constitute
"reconstruction" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.58, Subdivision 3a,
which would allow the issuance of bonds without an election even if there
are not planned special assessments for that work. However, this Capital
Improvement Plan would not meet the requirements for a five-year "street
reconstruction plan." If the City later plans to issue reconstruction bonds,
the City would need to prepare a separate reconstruction plan, or an
amendment to this Plan that specifically describes the streets to be
reconstructed.
�
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 11
APPENDIX A
�
PROJECT COSTS
(Capital Expenditures to be funded with Bond Proceeds)
The purpose of this bond is the refunding of the $10,760,000 Public Facilities
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A for the construction of the Public Works
Facility and the Fire Station.
�
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 12
APPENDIX B
�
PROPOSED CIP BOND ISSUES
�
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 13
• APPENDIX C
Pre-Sale Schedule dated May 1 S, 2007
5-Year City Capital Improvement Plan Bond Issuance
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
The City Council must take the following acrions befare Bonds can be issued:
• City Council directs preparation of a 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
• City Council conducts a Public Hearing on issuance of Bonds and Capital Improvement Plan.
• City Council approves Bonds and Capital Improvement Plan by at least a 3/Sths vote of the governing body
membership.
The table below lists the steps in the issuing process:
/ City Council adopts Resolution calling for Public Hearing on issuance of Bonds and on Capital
Improvement Plan.
4/19/2007 Close date to get Notice of Public Hearing on issuance of Bonds and on Capital Improvement Plan to
official newspaper for publication.
4/26/2007 Publish Notice of Public Hearing on issuance of Bonds and on Capital Improvement Plan (publication
no more than 28 days and no less than 14 days prior to hearing date). Additionally, notice may be
• posted on the City's official web site, if any.
5/15/2007 City Council holds Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Bonds and on Capital Improvement Plan and adopts
Resolution giving preliminary approval for their issuance and approving Capital Improvement Plan by
at least a 3/Sths vote of the governing body membership.
5/15/2007 City Council provides for sale of Bonds.
6/15/2007 Reverse referendum period ends (within 30 days of the public hearing).
6/19/2007 City Council accepts offer for Bonds and adopts Resolution-Approving sale of Bonds.
July 2007 Tentative closing/receipt of funds.
Net Debt Limit Annual Levy Limit
Assessor's Taxable Market Value 1,579,590,600 Assessor's Taxable Market Value 1,579,590,600
Multiply by 2% 0.02 Multiply by .16% 0.0016
Statutory Debt Limit 31,591,812 Statutory Levy Limit 2,527,345
Less: Debt Paid Solely from Taxes (12,765,000) Less: Annual Levy under CIP 856,000
Unused Debt Limit 18,826,812 Unused Levy Limit 3,383,345
•
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 14
• City of Hopkins ARA
$9,965,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2006
Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A as a G:O.
Table of Contents
, Report
Prior Original Debt Service 1
Debt Service Schedule 2
Sources & Uses 3
Debt Service Compazison G
•
�
• i
O6 net Ser 02A $10.76M Pu � SINGLE PURPOSE � 1/22/2007 � 1136 AM
•
• � � �
.�' � �
• City of Hopkins HRA
$10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A
Prior Original Debt Service
Date Principal Coupon Interest 7ota1 P+I Fiscal Total
08/012007 - - 223,468.75 223,468.75 -
02/01/2008 425,000.00 3.250% 223,468.75 648,468.75 871,93750
�8(012008 - - 216,56250 216,56250 -
02/012009 440,000.00 3.500% 216,56250 656,562SQ 873,125A0
08/012009 - - 208,86250 208,86250 -
02/012010 455,000.00 3.750% 208,86250 663,86250 872,725.00
08/O1/2010 - - 200,33125 200,33125 -
02/01/L011 475,000.00 3.750% 200,33125 675,33125 875,66250
08/012011 - - 191,425.00 191,425.00 -
02/012012 490,000.00 4.000% 191,425.00 681,425.00 872,850.00
08/012012 - - 181,625.00 181,625.00 -
02/012013 510,000.00 5.000% 181,625.00 691,625.00 873,250.00
08/012013 - - 168,875.00 168,875.00 -
02/O1/2014 535,000.00 S.QQO% 168,87500 703,875.00 812,75000
08/012014 - - 155,500.00 155,500.00 -
02/012015 565,000.00 5.000% 155,500.00 720,500.00 876,000.00
• 08/012015 = - 141,375.00 141,375.00 �
02/Ol/L016 590,000.00 5.000% 141,375.00 731,375.00 872,750.00
08/012016 126,625.00 126,625.00
02J012017 620,000.00 5.000% 126,625.00 746,625.00 873,250.00
08/012017 - - 111,125A0 111,125.00 -
02/O1/2018 655,000.00 5.000% 111,125.00 766,125.00 877,250.00
08/012018 - - 94,750.00 94,750.00 -
Q2/Q12019 685,00090 5.000% 94,750.00 779,750A0 874,500.00
08/012019 - - 77,625.00 77,625.00 -
02/012020 720,000.00 5.000% 77,625.00 797,625.00 875,250.00
08/012020 - - 59,625.00 59,625.00 -
02/012021 755,000.00 5.000% 59,625.00 814,625A0 874,250.00
08/012021 - - 40,750.00 40,750.00 -
02J012022 795,000.00 5.000% 40,750.00 835,750.00 876,500.00
Q8(Ol(L022 - - 20,875.00 20,875.00 -
02/012023 835,000.00 5.000% 20,875.00 855,875.00 876,750.00
Total $9,550,000.00 $4,438,800.00 $13,98$$00.00 -
Yield Statistics
Average Life
9.476 Years
Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 9.476 Years
Average Coupon 4.9050224°!0
Refundin Bond Information
Refunding I�ated Date 2/012QQ7
Refunding Delivery Date 2/O 1/2007
• Ser 02A $10J6M Pub Fac L � SINGLE PURPOSE � 1/22/2007 � 11:36 AM
•
♦ � s
.►'
r�' � �
� City of Hopkins HRA
$9,965,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2006
Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A as a G.O.
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total
o2/O1/2o07 - - - - -
08f01l2007 - - 200,490.00 200,490.00 -
02/Ol/2008 455,000.00 4.000% 20�,490.00 655,490.00 855,980.00
08/Ol/2008 - - 191,390.00 191,390.00 -
02/0112009 475,000.00 4.000% 191,390.00 666,390.00 857,780.00
08/Ol/2009 - - 181,890.00 181,890.00 -
02/Ol/2010 490,000.00 4.000% 181,890.00 671,890.00 853,780.00
08/01/2010 - - 172,090.00 172,090.00 -
Q2/�1(2011 515,000.00 4.000% 172,090.00 687,090.00 859,180.00
08/Ol/201I - - 161,790.00 161,790.OQ -
02/Ol/2012 530,000.00 4.000% 161,790.00 691,790.00 853,580.00
08/01f2012 - - 151,190.00 151,190.00 -
02/Ol/2013 555,000.00 4.000% 151,190.00 106,190.00 857,380.00
08/01/2013 - - 140,090.00 140,090.00 -
02/01/2014 575,000.00 4.000% 140,090.00 715,090.00 855,180.00
08/Ol/2014 - - 128,590.00 128,590.00 -
02/01/2015 600,000.00 4.000% 128,590.00 728,590.00 857,180.00
• 08/Ol/2015 - - 116,590.00 116,590.00 -
02(O1l2016 625,000.00 4.000% 11b,590.00 741,590.00 858,180.00
08/O1/2016 - - 104,090.00 1Q4,Q9Q.00 -
02/Ol/2017 65Q000.00 4.000% 104,090.00 754,090.00 858,180.00
08l01l2017 - - 91,090.00 91,090.00 -
02/Ol/2018 680,000.00 4.000% 91,�9�A� 771,040.00 862,180.00
08/Ol/2018 - - 77,490.00 77,490.00 -
02/0112019 705,000.00 4.000% 77,490.00 782,490.00 859,980.00
08/Ol/2019 - - 63,390.00 63,390.00 -
02/Ol/2020 730,000.00 4.000% 63,390.00 793,390.00 856,780.00
08/01/2020 - - 48,790.00 48,790.00 -
�210112021 760,000.00 4.100% 48,790.00 808,790.00 857,580.00
08/01/202] - - 33,210.00 33,210.00 -
02/Ol/2022 795,000.00 4.100% 33,210.00 828,210.00 861,420.00
08/Ol/2022 - - 16,912.50 16,912.50 -
02/01/2023 825,000.00 4.100% 16,912.50 841,912.50 858,825.00
Total $9,965,000.00 - $3,758,165.00 $13,723,165.OQ -
Yield Statistics
Bond Year pollazs $93,060.00
Average Life 9339 Years i
Aveiage Coupon 4.0384322°/a
Net Interest Cost (MC) 4.0047595%
True Interest Cost (TIC) 3.9937262%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 3.9269879%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC) 4.0503547%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost 3.8846947%
• Weighted Average Maturity 9338 Years
06 net Ser 02A $10.76M Pu � SINGLE PURPOSE � 1/27J2007 � 11:36 AM
•
• � • •
.�- • ..-
� City of Hopkins HRA
$9,965,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2006
Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A as a G.O.
Sources & Uses
Dated 02/01/2007 � Delivered 02/01/2007
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $9,965,000.00
Reoffering Premium 105 160 80
Total Sources $10 070,160 80
Uses Offunds
Total Underwriter's Discount (0.500%) 49 825 00
Costs of Issuance 42 000 00
Gross Bond Insurance Premium ( 17.5 bp) 24 000 00
Deposrt to Net Cash Escrow Fund 9 953 O55 16
Roundmg Amount 1 280 64
Total Uses
$10 070,160 80
I
�
• O6netSer02A$tOJ6MPu � SINGLEPURPOSE � 1/22/2007 � 11:36AM �
•
♦ � � �
.�' � � .i-
• City of Hopkins HRA
$9,965,000 G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 2006
Proposed Net Cash Refunding of
$10,760,000 Public Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2002A as a G.O.
Debt Service Comparison
Date Total P+I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings
o2/oir�oo� - - - _
02/012008 855,980.00 855,980.00 871,93750 15,957.50
02/O1/2009 857,780.00 857,780.00 873,125.00 15,345.00
02/012010 853,780.00 853,780.00 872,725.00 18,945.00
02/012011 859,180.00 859,180.00 875,66250 16,48250
02/012012 853,580.00 853,580.00 872,850.00 19,270.00
02/012013 857,380.00 857,380.00 873,250.00 15,870.00
02/012014 855,180.00 855,180.00 872,750.00 17,570.00
02/O1/LO15 857,180.00 857 876,000.00 18,820.00
02/O1/2016 858,180.00 858,180.00 872,750.00 14,570.00
02/O1/2017 858,180.00 858,180.00 873,250.00 15,070.00
02/O1/2018 862,180.00 862,180.00 877,250.00 15,070.00
02/012019 859,980.00 859,980.00 874,500.00 14,520.00
02/012020 856,780.00 856,780.00 875,250.00 18,470.00
02/01/2021 857,580.00 857,580.00 874,250.00 16,670.00
02/O1/L022 861,420.00 861,420.00 876,500.00 15,080.00
02/O1/L023 858,825.00 858,825.00 876,750.00 17,925.00
• Total $13,723,165.00 $13,723,165.00 $13,988�800.00 $265,635A0
i
PV Analysis Summary (Net to Net)
Net FV CashflowSavings 265,635.00
Gross PV Debt Service Savings ..................... 197,84957
Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 4.050%(AIC)............ 197,84957
Contingency or Rounding Amount ..................: 1,280.64
Net Present Value Benefit $199,13021
Net PV Benefit /$9,550,000 Refunded Principal... 2.085%
Net PV Benefit /$9,965,000 Refunding Principal.. 1.998%
Net PV Benefit /$] 0,245 671.43 PV Refunded Debt Service 1.944%
Average Annual Cash Flow Savings .................. 16,602.19
Refunding Bond Information
Refunding Drated Date 2/O1l2007
Refunding Delivery Date 2/01/2007
• 06 net Ser 02A $10J6M Pu � SINGLE PURPOSE � 1/22/2007 � 11:36 AM -
•
♦ � �
.�' � • .�-
APPENDIX D
�
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota (the
"City") will meet on
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
at the City Hall, 1010 First Street South, Hopkins, Minnesota, at or after 7:30 p.m., to hold a public
hearing concerning (1) the adoption of an amendment to the five-year capital improvement plan for
the City prepared in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 (the "Plan"); and (2) the
issuance of general obligation bonds (the "Bonds") to acquire the City's public works and fire
station facility from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Hopkins (the
"HRA") and refund the outstanding lease-revenue bonds issued by the HRA to finance that facility.
The maximum principal amount of the refunding Bonds to be issued under the Plan is $10,000,000.
•
If a petition requesting a vote on the issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to five
percent of the votes cast in the City in the last general election, is filed with the City Clerk within 30
days after the public hearing, the City may issue the Bonds only after obtaining approval of a
majority of voters voting on the question at an election.
All interested persons may appear and be l�eard at the public hearing either orally or in
writing, or may file written comments with the City Clerk before the hearing.
Dated: [date of publication]
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
/s/
City Clerk
•
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 15
Resolution to be drafted by Kennedy & Graven
•
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF , MINNESOTA
HELD: , 20_
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular or special meeting of the City Council of
the City of , Minnesota, was duly called and held at the City Hall in
, Minnesota on the day of , 20 at •
for the purpose, in part, of giving preliminary approval for the issuance of the City's general
obligation capital improvement plan bonds and adopting the City's capital improvement plan.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE CITY'S GENERAL OBLIGATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS IN AN AMOUNT
. NOT TO EXCEED $ AND
ADOPTING THE CITY OF MINNESOTA CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN OF 20 THROUGH 20_ THEREFOR
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of , Minnesota (the "City")
proposes to issue its general obligation capital improvement plan bonds (the "Bonds") and adopt the
City of , Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan of 20_ through 20_ therefor (the
"Plan"); and
B. WHEREAS, the City has caused notice of the public hearing on the intention to issue
the Bonds and on the proposed adoption of the Plan to be published pursuant to and in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521; and
C. WHEREAS, a public hearing on the intention to issue the Bonds and on the proposed
Plan has been held on this date, following published notice of the hearing as required by law; and
D. WHEREAS, in approving the Plan, the City Council considered for each proj ect and
for the overall Plan:
1. The condition of the City's existing infrastructure, including the proj ected
need for repair and replacement;
2. The likely demand for the improvement;
• 3. The estimated cost of the improvement;
4. The available public resources;
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 16
.
5. The level of overlapping debt in the City;
6. The relative benefits and costs of alternative uses of the funds;
7. Operating costs of the proposed improvements; and
8. Alternatives for providing services more efficiently through shared facilities
with other local government units, and '
NOW, THEREFOR, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of ,
Minnesota, that the City hereby gives preliminary approval for the issuance of up to
$ aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. The Plan is hereby adopted, the same
being before the City Council and made a part of these proceedings by reference. The City declares
its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the Plan from the proceeds of the Bonds.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member
and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
• Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
�
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 17
� STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
CITY OF
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of ,
Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly
called and held on the date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and the
same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a resolution
giving preliminary approval for the issuance of the City's general obligation capital improvement
plan bonds and adopting the City's capital improvement plan therefor.
WITNESS my hand this day of , 20_.
� City Clerk
[Bonds must be approved by at least three-fifths of the members.]
[Issuance of Bonds is subject to a 30-day reverse referendum after the public hearing.]
•
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Page 18
Y
� EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPHINS, MINNESOTA
HELD: May 15, 2007
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, was held at the City Hall in Hopkins, Minnesota
on Tuesday, the 15th day of May, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose, in part of
giving preliminary approval for the issuance of the City's general obligation capital
improvement bonds and adopting an amendment to the City's capital improvement
plan.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
• _
Member ':: introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption: _
CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNE50TA
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-038
ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL IlVIPROVEMENT PLAN AND PROVIDING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR THE IS5UANCE OF BONDS THEREUNDER
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.521 (the "Act"), cities are authorized to
adopt a capital improvement plan and amendments thereto and carry out progams for the financing of capital
improvements; and '
WHEREAS, the City of Hopldns, Minnesota (the "City") has prepared an amendment to its Capital
Improvement Plan for the years 2007 through 2011(the "Plan Amendinent"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Plan Amendment, the City proposes to issue its general obligation
capital improvement bonds in an aggregate principal amount of $9 (the "Bonds"), to acquire the
City's public works and fire station facility from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
• City of Hopkins (the "Authority") and refund the outstanding lease-revenue bonds issued by the Authority to
finance that facility; and
,i, .fil{.
WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the City Council of the City has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing regarding adoption of the Plan Amendment and issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the requirements
of the Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA:
1. The Plan Amendment is approved and preliminary approval for the issuance of the Bonds is
granted, provided that if a petition requesting a vote on issuance of the Bonds, signed by voters equal to five
percent of the votes cast in the City in the last general election, is filed with the City Clerk within 30 days
after the public hearing, the City may issue the Bonds only after obtainiug approval of a majority of voters
voting on the question at an election.
2. The City declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the Plan Amendment
from the proceeds of the Bonds.
3. City staff are hereby authorized to do all other things and take all other actions as may be
necessary or appropriate to carry out the Plan Amendment and the issuance of the Bonds in accordance with '
any applicable laws and regulations. �
Adopted this 15th day of May, 2007.
� �,;;
Mayor
' ;
City Clerk
�
� ,
;
�
�
f
�
I
,, �
�� !
�
,
.
- ---
-- - - -- -- - --- --- - -- __ _
.,.,,�;:«,,,,;,,, ,,, ,, ;, � , . i :,.. � _ _ _ _ i _
_.
.
, The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
HP110-73 (AJP)
• 311014v.1
�
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA � � ��� '
����
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF HOPKINS
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Hopkins,
Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIF`Y that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing
extract of minutes with the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City, duly
called and held on the date therein indicated, which are on file and of record in my office, and
the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to a
resolution giving preliminary approval for the issuance of the City's general obligation capital
improvement bonds and adopting an amendment to the C�ty's capital improvement plan therefor. �
WITNESS my hand this day of , 20_.
f
City"�le�k`
��'
�
�
�
�
�
��
F
�
_ - --
-- - __
- -
- -- _
,, ,,,;;,,,, , ,� , ._:. .. , .. , . . ,