The URL can be used to link to this page

CUP 94-04. - � � Y � G �` �� ^ October 17, 1994 y y Planning Report CUP 94-4 Q P K � N CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT- BLAKE SCHOOLS Pronosed Action. Staff recommends the following motion: Move to aQprove Resolution RZ94-15 recommendin� ap�roval of a conditional use pernut to construct an addition to Blake School Overview. Blake School is proposing a 5.5 million dollar improvement to the school located at 110 Blake Road. With this remodeling an addition is proposed to the existing building. The addition will be located on the east side of the site, attached to the existing school. Blake School also will be remodeling some of the interior of the existing space. The proposed addition will be a two-story 34,120 square foot addition. It will be constructed into the hill and have the same "look" as the existing building. The top floor of the e�sting ^ building will be visible because the new addition will be lower than the existing building. The impact to the site will be minimal even though existing building will undergo a major renovation and addition constructed. The site is so large and the building is located quite a distance from any lot line. Blake School is not proposing to increase their attendance with the remodeling or the addition. Primarv Issues to Consider o What is the zoning of the property? o How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? o What are the specifics of the development? o What are the requirements for City sponsored revenue bond projects? Supporting Documents. o Analysis of Issues o Site Plans o Resolution RZ94-15 �w�� V'1.,�'�`�+.Ll..� N�Anderson, AICP Planner � CUP94-4 --� Page 2 Primary Issues to Consider. o What is the zoning of the property? The subject property is zoned R-1-C o How has the Comprehensive Plan designated the subject site? The Comprehensive Plan has designated the site as residential. o What are the specifics of the development? Landscaping The landscaping on the site will remain the same. The site has more than enough landscaping to meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements. When Blake School redid their athletic fields several years ago a majority of the site was re-landscaped. The proposed addition will not affect the athletic fields. Fire MarshaUBuitding Inspector The Fire Marshal and Building Inspector have reviewed the preliminary plans. The inspectors ^ are working with the applicant to resolve any building code issues. Parking The parking will remain the same. The new addition will require 14 more parking spaces, but the site has more than the required parking for a middle school. The existing parking will not be affected by the proposed addition. Access The access to the site will remain the same. There cunently are access points from County Road 3 and Blake Road. Exterior The exterior will be brick. The new brick will attempt to match the e�cisting brick. The new addition will have the same architectural style as the existing building. Setbacks/Zoning issues Because the building is not close to any lot line, there are no setback concerns. The proposed ^ building is not close to any lot line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 50 foot setback. CUP94-4 � Page 3 o What are the requirements for City sponsored revenue bond projects? On September 20, 1994, Blake Schools received approval of a $5.5 million revenue bond to facilitate both a remodeling and eYpansion project. As part of the application process for consideration of this City-sponsored revenue bond, there are design certain requirements that a project must meet. The project must exceed minimum code requirements by including at least five of the following features into the project: a. Brick b. Building design should be a distinctive, non-generic style c. A noticeable increase in the size and quantity of landscape plantings over what the City normally requires. d. Underground irrigation of all landscaping. e. Open space, other than required setbacks. ^ f. At least 10% more parking than Code requires. j. Walkway along street frontages. h. All parking stall widths at least ten feet. i. All signs shall be at least 20% smaller or fewer than allowed by code. The proposed development will meet requirements a-e. Alternatives 1. Recommend approval of the conditional use permit to construct the proposed addition. By recommending approval of the conditional use permit, the City Council will consider a recommendation of approval. 2. Recommend denial of the conditional use pernut to construct the proposed addition. By recommending denial of the conditional use permit, the City Council will consider a recommendation of denial. If the Planning Commission chooses this alternative, findings will have to be stated that support this decision. 3. Continue for further information. If the Planning Commission indicates that further � information is needed, the item should be continued. � �snduz�� uusAa a�� uauzaiduxo� pu� o� a��ja.z �� uijt�ap pue aoio� •dn-��q pn�s jaa�s �.zrum.us � uo �uiiiz�ap �s��a.zd �im x�T.zq �o uou�uiqu�o� e aq ji� .zoi.�a�xa au,I, �auz�.z� jaa�.s � uo s�sio[ qam uado �iq pa�oddns ��ap j�auz uo a�a.z�uo� aq n� aaru�n,z�s mau a�, •ioo�I�S aIPPiY�i �uusixa au��o janaj �samoi ay� o� �uA�auuo� janai .�addn s�i q�ina `IPq a� o�ut �jinq aq �im uoujpp� . � n�aN aq� `�sea ay� o� umop sadojs �iids�qs a�is a� s� -anoq� pu�g�j�.zou� pu� ianai .zamoi a� �� la�ua� �ipay� a� aq ji�n uoTsuaixa ��a pan.zn� � �� .zotsa�a au� �� pa�.�o�uias pu� s� siy� uo pa.�a�ua� •sn.� uuo3i�n.z� i�uouip�.z� s�uipjmq �uusua ay� y�inn u�r�� ii� u�eid T��ixtauzuz�s au,I, •�no�no.zy� ssa�� ap�o.�d o� pa��sodso�ui aq �� so��naJa u� `ui�� •a��ds a� �no jj� �� suzoo.�ssei� j�uouipp� � tlam se `doqs pu� �.za�ua� �ipay� `�isnW �a�uai�s •uouipp� �003 a.z�nbs OZZ`�i� `�i.Zo�s orn� � aq �u� iooq�s aippty� �uusn�a ay� o� pa�auuo� pu� 30 �sea a� oZ I�iOLLIQQ��k�I�I ��utsapjuilds pu� �utuopipuo� .�te �uTpteo.zd suza�s�is s� jiam se `�no�no.�ya pa�z�sui aq �ind smopu�a maN •uoAipp� Z9C,j a� pu� iooq�g aippry� atp uaa�aq ssa�� apinosd o� aaru�n.z�s �uAs�a a� o�ut pa��e.z�a�ui aq Ii�n .zo��aja mau d •uznjn�u.zn� alrun3 pu� s�i�po� a��pouzuio�� o� pa.�n�guo�a.z �ili�o� aq � .zoi.za�ut ay� `pa.�o�sal aq o� y�oq a.�� q�iyns `Iad�q� a� pu�e uioog a�uaia3uo� �.inqsJlid �uo�slq a��o uopda�xa a� �� •uoq�nouas anisua�a o�.zapun iiu� �utpiinq �uAsixa a�, ZOOH�S �'IQQIW �NLLS�3 �II�1I `SI�iI}IdOH NOI.L�AOI�I�2I QN�' NOISN�cIX3 'IOOH�S 3'IQQIL1i "IOOH�S �I�'Ig �H.L �' �. _ -_� � i � <... ,. �,: - -_ � - _ I ,.. u .. .. T� —__ ' ___ - __.t '.' _ �_-^'�.......�^" - ��=�`v� `� LOCATION MAP .�� =r�` I - - -,�;�;:. �'�^� _--, � a .,..►', - ^ "✓; -j ��' � _'v,-�- '/, �'� . -'- , —,,� . �- �^�`�';�„�,x , .- R_4 - '` = .�.::,Q:. ,�, Lry �� +ow _ �/:, � �C � I '/' \ - 7 � ' � _ ,��'"'�\. �'� � ��i �.� .� �i I � r} '��. -I _� ;_ ��::�� —^-��i .... �� R•4 � � :, �\� .. _ � ��.,�._ � r-,.� �--- ,�. i I_2� ..___: - _� ,..__ _�,�-��`�' ,-� _ � - - =�`� �:"�;�� r�� % �I — - = ' \�^ �, ~ � I� '� �. _ "�� / _ — ' �` ii j :'t _-_•�J�'-�-,,, ~-� ,�' �, /� ` I�-'-'--'1 � � .n• ' � I I j`--=�=-:a- � �� ,� � `-J r_ 4. I .� � �^ -^-.� ,�_ � �i� la _ _—�u� �,.—" 1 �—� � 'I-2 I��i� e-3 R-3 �i � � �� _—__ ,�-�, j�` �,, �— �� ___-�r--.-.�Fr'�-"-./-�/j �� I�' _;-� C� ,_ �,,; a-a Puo 3 ' _ - -��'` / � =�.-� ;�'� �/ _ i � 'i '� � � I ��I'i � =.��-- °,�,` � � -�. �- r--,�� . � �� . ��. s.:.� ; � ; -��_� ::��.., ; � ��^ i y1 i ,/'��T� ' � ':�`_'��-'`---'---'�'---�' �, -, _1 � "' �� ::�,--.-:s-.��-�-�`�.� - I i ------,; -_.__;--�-^�- I Y � ae = `i�::��:�':�:�:;.�;:;.:�;::�.�-�� 4-,=,-;�i� _ ;�� n � I'2 �� _ �;c�..;s,.•.• � --,,—,��_^'��n �� ; � � �'��'',:`:::;'':c::�:�::':::::�;.f:;•f.�i---�,..-----J' :,--�-=��,�'--�i� I .� � �/ � I ' � �.oe. __ �{C;r�;,•i,'rr{'.•t;�:�::,•r,�; . J ` � ... r u j I ( /// I �..�n - �L� �^� �, r�_ � � �� ,�. `�.��C_ ...'�.^.�. �—„ i ^� '3� I � � •---.,----��-�� _�u r--'F---�-- r-.-. j// I ""_,��.. .��:.._.l�r��.---�---� � �T%� I � .�= ,��.,=^��'_� ;.-; � —^i � '/ :I , I~� --__-- —�- _r-.— --�-I�' ' � �'= .�C- ;_,-- r—�r--"� :�.�� ,�' ,, ��I' r'`" ,r--�r--,� ":�"1�i` ( / � � �-=�— .... l � �� e,.. �=� �- '��'^� I ;� \ � � ', REVISIONS i •� _— = ol 9EviSIONS � � �) %� �1 gY DATE I @v DATE i NO i8J53 / —_� R� \ �� .N . -a 2�6/79 — � ''`�'I I� �u pRD.NO.el-�TB 61ziet_ . �--..r--—� � pqp Y0.eY-S1 ---t/71/B2 ' =�—�_I ,`�: '�' � �� —bA .�i=53�—lnie! ��'� ORD NO.BS-553 8/6/85 �i� � ' .NO.e&560 �B/!6 � -^—^r • � , _� � �` I%� II I .�� . . 6/16/!6 �d.NO.86563 � = C_ ` �� No.e-5 + vn� 7 - ._ -��- .. II r-, '_SR .No.ai-5�Y .i ie� � �[ �r, I/� � � � .NO.3H�605 Z�16�(�EB� — /� . �I'/� � � 88-607 5// 187-8 I - L_ / ///„ r I O.N0. 2 _ i /�' an.No. i __ v i /� .... � � �'-�� i ' � "� �� I ZONING DISTRICTS c•.. , � �� ;� � — ;, R-2� ; ,,,�„ , ;,� i � `%%% �► � % ;, � R-I-A SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY HIGH DENSITY �` ,. ; i';' ;<I I �7 ; ,'r ; R-I-B SiNGi.E FAMILY HIGH DENSITY �,.,. . � J � ��ti , ��, %�J R-i-C SINGLE FAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY ±§`�'`;-- . % " � I R-I-D SINGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY � 7i�,; ��;, ' � • � � . r----- R-I-E SiNGLE FAMILY LOW DENSITY �' �� I R-2 LOW DENSiTY MUITIPLE FAMILY � ., II� ,y'; ,- R-3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY � -� '�`'j� R-4 MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY I R-4 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - R-5 HIGH DENSiTY MULTIPLE FAMILY �� _ R-6 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE "rAMILY - B-! LIMITED BUSiNESS B-2 CENTRAL BUSiNESS B-3 GcNERAL BUSiNE�S - — - -- - I-i INCUSTRIAL I-_ Gc�1��:.L '�:�1:�-= _ —.� CITY OF HOPKINS Hennepin County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO: RZ94-15 RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMl�fE�IDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO TI� EXISTING BUII,DING AT BLAKE SCHOOL WHEREAS, an application for a conditional use permit CUP94-4, made by Blake School for construction of an addition to the e�sting building at 110 Blake Road is recommended for approval. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for a conditional use pernut CUP94-4 was filed with the City of Hopkins on September 2, 1994. 2. That the Hopkins Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on October 25, 1994: all ^ persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. That the written comments and analysis of the City staff and the Planning Commission were considered. 4. A legal description of the subject property is as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of Lot 82, thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line thereof 150 feet, thence Southeasterly at right angles 100 feet, thence Northeasterly at right angles 123 8/10 feet to East line of said lot, thence North 103 37/100 feet to beginning, Lot 82, Auditors Subdivision No. 239. That part of Lot 81 lying North of the South 125 feet and that part of South 125 feet of Lot 81 lying East of the West 38 feet thereof, Lot 81, Auditors Subdivision No. 239. Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 82, thence Northeasterly/along the Northwesterly line thereof to the Northwest corner of Lot 83, thence South to Southwest corner thereof, thence East to Southeast corner thereof, thence North to Northeast corner thereof, thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of Lot 82 distant 289 feet, thence Southeasterly at right angles 100 feet, thence Northeasterly at right angles 123 8/10 feet to East line of Lot 82, thence South to Southeast corner thereof, thence Northeasterly at right angles 123 8/10 feet to the East line of Lot 82, thence South to -� Southeast corner thereof, thence Westerly along the South line thereof to the Southwest corner thereof, thence North to beginning, Lot 82, Auditors Subdivision No. 239. Page 2 ^ Lot 83, Auditors Subdivision No. 239. Lots 1,2,3 and that part of Lots 7 through 19 inclusive, lying East of the West 10 feet thereof, including adjacent one half of streets and alley vacated, Block 19, West Minneapolis Center. That part of Lots 1 through 10, inclusive, lying east of the west 10 feet thereof, including adjacent one half of streets vacated, Block 37, West Minneapolis Center. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the application for conditional use permit CUP94-4 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following Findings of Fact: 1. That the applicant meets the requirements for a school in the residential zoning district. 2. That the applicant meets the requirement for a conditional use permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that application for CUP94-4 is hereby recommended for approval based on the following condition: --� 1. That the Watershed District approve the drainage plan. Adopted this 25th day of October, 1994. Dan Johnson, Chairperson � UO I 1 I. r - _ 10 , r^,r k --N T Kl -k �Q �g 1 ( 6 zress Ul a ;j :1y9••- � TTT 7 T� r7 K 2b '®' 7 \ ^ b �- Im VIS, to \o \ �'�y c1 C7tlI4�gm �P� ) „ �Q] 1v. slyn n- Ez'996 b '�J �Q+ �?�'� .✓ t i® !/ ® 8 S 4.. µ ode L I 0 `,��• d O h �� 41 ' J( J I I � b N i0 . V— 41 N p Uj � •r's •9 I l � 1 I / Ti N�4.� a� m y� �J � � C, r I N W. Vi � NSD to "Too _ — _ — _— ... g - - -Y m ( d 0 1 YI J T 1 8 yX4 oil, m o " m d J m ale �•.. I ✓f c b�a qb CA � :1 L"b 96 m / 'y 7 r b'196� �� 9 ss)� � ' �. N' �tVf ✓) �/ . P o f+y mm r, ieF. v0o1Y9AY '*'C_ i dIt- &j—_ k� m - �o as6a'es6 s9 —s. NP . W Y �Dua��_..c ,�., ..,,, o��-�(s ) r h=-z�°-��— rev--'�n- -�- �=?`�%,-w•�=� ,.--'i-=-a � -- �' --_--•-,: �;� � �,, \) � � // �� •' 7-77-77-7--/-77-7,-77-7-7-7777,7-,-7-7---,7 N j n [EEEL -- Y-1 I i o ( -1 IV n I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 i I I I I I I I I �rV � i I I I i I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1� I I