11-15-05 Charter Commission Regular MeetingCITY OF HOPKINS
CHARTER COMMISSION
AGENDA
November 15, 2005
6:30 p.m.
Hopkins Center for the Arts
Upstairs Conference Room
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting
4. Consideration of Communications
5. Old Business
• Instant Runoff Elections
6. New Business
7. Adjournment
ATTACHMENTS:
• Minutes of the September 27, 2005 Charter Commission meeting
• Current Roster of the Charter Commission
• Resolution 2005-02
• . Ordinance 2005-958 and Ordinance 2005-958a
UNAPPROVED
Minutes of the Hopkins Charter Commission
September 27, 2005
The Hopkins Charter Commission met on September 27. Present were Commission
members Dorothy Boen, David Day, Fran Hesch, Karen Jensen, Roger Johnson, Steve
Lewis, Robert Miller, and Emily Wallace -Jackson.
The meeting was brought to order at 6:35 p.m.
Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting
Commissioner Day moved and Commissioner Boen seconded the motion to approve the
minutes of the April 26, 2005 meeting, The motion was approved unanimously.
Communications
There were no communications.
Old Business
Amendment to Section 12.05 — Sale of Property
The Commission voted at the April 26 meeting to amend the Charter by deleting the
words: "which the Council may by resolution designate." Mr. Genellie said that this was
an unnecessary procedure. About the only time the Council ever approved expenditures
by resolution was the approval of the annual budget. The Council would retain the ability
to apply the proceeds from the sale of property to any public purpose. However, if the ,
proceeds were put into one of the City funds, it would be commingled with existing
assets.
Commissioner Robert Miller initiated a discussion regarding the manner in which
property is sold. How is the value determined of property? The current language merely
states that the property cannot be sold for less than the assessed value. The assessed value
may be much less than the current market value. Should the Commission require an
appraisal for the sale of property? What do you do in the case of redevelopment property?
Commissioner Jensen moved and Commissioner Lewis seconded the motion to refer
Section 12.05 to the City Attorney for review of the; questions raised by the Commission.
The motion passed unanimously.
Ranked Ballot Voting
Commissioner Hesch gave a summary of the Alternative Voting Task Force's work
during the last year. The task force considered the broad issue of changing the voting
1
UNAPPROVED
system on the entire ballot including the election for school board. The voting system
used by School districts, however, is controlled by the legislature.
Commissioner Hesch gave a presentation on voting systems. The proposed change would
be designed to ensure that the winners have a majority of the votes.
The Task Force is recommending Instant Runoff Voting (IRV). There would be a ranked
ballot for Mayor and Council using two passes of IRV for the two council seats. The
Task Force recommended this alternative be adopted into the Charter, leaving the actual
ballot implementation to the time when it becomes technically and financially feasible.
Commissioner Hesch said that the costs of implementing this voting system were not
known at this time. There was an estimate that if Hopkins were to pay fora programming
change by itself, the cost could exceed $200,000.
Tony Solgard said that the voting equipment will be modified in the future to allow for
IRV.
Commissioner Day asked how this could work for the School Board when the District
covers several cities. The Task Force looked at this but determined that state legislation
would be needed for the school board and statutory cities.
Commissioner Jensen said that most of the people that she talked to thought it was a good
idea.
Commissioner Jensen moved to authorize Jim Genellie and City Attorney to draft a
resolution and Charter amendment, implementing IRV for the Mayor and Council using
two passes of IRV for the two council seats, to present to the next meeting of the
Commission. Commissioner Wallace -Jackson seconded the motion.
Commissioner Wallace -Jackson asked how the two passes would work for the two
Council members. This led to an extensive discussion of how the voting would take
place.
Commissioner Robert Miller asked whether there would be an improvement in
governance through this voting method. Commissioner Hesch said that the result of IRV
is that winning candidates have a majority of the votes.
Commissioner Jensen said that this voting system would excite people and improve
turnout.
Commissioner Wallace -Jackson said that IRV would allow people to vote for who they
really wanted even if they were a minority candidate.
2
LTQjkfiV . JI, j7,,jj_jWp
Commissioner Robert Miller asked about the representation on the Task Force.
Commissioner Hesch said the Task Force tried to get as many representatives of different
views as possible but that proponents were more willing to serve.
Commissioner Jensen said she was especially persuaded by the League of Women
Voters.
Commissioner Hesch called for a vote on the motion. Commissioners Boen, Hesch,
Jensen, Johnson, Lewis, and Wallace -Jackson voted aye. Commissioners Miller and Day
voted nay. The motion passed.
The Commission set its next meeting for Tuesday, November 15 at 6:30 p.m.
Adjournment
Commissioner Day moved and Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion to adjourn.
The meeting adjourned by unanimous consent.
3
c) CHARTER COMMISSION
October 27, 2005
Name
Term
Term. Expires
Dorothy Boen
Second
4/13/2008
David Day
First
9/22/2007
Roger Gross r
Second
4/13/2008
Fran Hesch ✓
First
4/7/2006
John Hutchison
First
10/20/2005 _
Karen Jensen ✓
First
10/20/2005
Roger Johnson
Second
8/26/2009
Steve Lewis
First
9/26/2008
Jerre Miller
First
9/26/2008
Robert Miller
First
4/7/2006
Emily Wallace -Jackson
First
3/5/2008
Chair: Fran Hesch
Vice -Chair: Roger Gross
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
CHARTER COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-02
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT OF THE
HOPKINS CHARTER BY ORDINANCE
Whereas, the Hopkins Charter Commission has the authority under Minnesota Statute,
Section 410.12, subdivision 7 to recommend amendments to the City Charter;
and
Whereas, the Commission has determined that Chapters 2 and 4 of the Hopkins City
Charter should be amended to modify the method used to elect members of the
City Council;
Now Therefore be it resolved by the Hopkins Charter Commission that the Hopkins
Municipal Charter be amended by Ordinance enacted by the City Council of the City of
Hopkins pursuant to Minnesota Statute 410.12.
Passed and adopted at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Hopkins Charter
Commission on November 15, 2005.
Fran Hesch, Chair
ATTEST:
James A. Genellie, Secretary
Hopkins Charter Commission
CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 2005-958
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS
UPON RECOMMENDATION OF THE HOPKINS CHARTER COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO M.S.A. CHAPTER 410.12, SUBD. 7
The City Council of the City of Hopkins, upon recommendation of and
from the Hopkins City Charter Commission does hereby ordain and
thus amend and adopt the following changes, deletions, and
amendments of or from the following chapters and sections of the
Hopkins City Charter: -
Section 1. Section 2.03, is amended as follows:
Subdivision 3. After the City general election, the 'City Council
shall, at their next regularly scheduled meeting, meet as the
canvassing board and declare the results of the election. r1
eandidate reeeiving the irsEffhce4=- nid be-r of -yetes fer a pa-tiel
eff rye is eleetIf the election results in a tie, then the
winner should be determined by lot,in the presence of the Council
acting as the canvassing board.
Section 2. Section 4.04, is added as follows:
SEC. 4.04. INSTANT RUNOFF ELECTIONS.
(a) For the purposes of this section: (1) a candidate
shall be deemed "continuing" if the candidate has not been
eliminated; (2) a ballot shall be deemed "continuing" if it is not
exhausted; and (3) a ballot shall be deemed "exhausted, and not
counted in further stages of the tabulation, if all of the
candidates chosen on that ballot have been eliminated or there are
no more candidates indicated on the ballot. If a ranked -choice
ballot gives equal rank to two or more candidates, the ballot shall
be declared exhausted at the point of the ballot when such multiple
rankings are reached. If a voter casts a ranked -choice ballot but
skips -a rank, the voter's vote shall be transferred to that voter's
next ranked choice.
(b) The Mayor and members of the City Council shall be
elected using a ranked -choice, or "instant runoff," ballot. The
ballot shall allow voters to rank a number of choices in order of
preference equal to the total number of candidates for each office;
provided, however, if the voting system, vote tabulation system or
similar or related equipment used by the City and County cannot
feasibly accommodate choices equal to the total number of
candidates running for each office, then the Director of Elections
�,' may limit the number of choices a voter may rank to no fewer than
three. The ballot shall in no way interfere with a voter's ability
to cast a vote for a write-in candidate.
(c) If acandidate receives a majority of the first
choices, that candidate shall be declared elected.. If no candidate
receives a majority, the candidate who received the fewest first
choices shall be eliminated and each vote cast for that candidate_
shall be transferred to the next ranked candidate on that voter's
ballot, except that if the total number of first choice votes of
the two or more candidates credited with the lowest number of first
choice votes is less than the number of first choice votes credited
to the candidate with the next highest number of votes, those
candidates with the lowest number of first choice votes shall be
eliminated simultaneously and their first choice votes transferred
to the next -ranked continuing candidate on each ballot in a single
counting operation. If, after this transfer of votes, any
candidate has a majority of the first choice votes from the
continuing ballots, that candidate shall be declared elected.
(d) This process of eliminating -candidates and,
transferring their votes to the next -ranked continuing candidates
shall be repeated until a candidate receives a majority of the
first choice votes from the continuing ballots.
(e) The members of the city council shall:be elected
,sequentially. After the first candidate is elected, the votes shall
be recounted, with any ballots marked for the already elected
candidate now counting for the next ranked candidate on each
ballot.
(f) In the event of a tie between two or more candidates
after any round of counting, the candidate to be eliminated shall
be determined by lot
(g) The City Clerk.shall conduct a voter education
campaign to familiarize voters with the ranked -choice or, "instant
runoff," method of voting.
(h) Ranked choice, or "instant runoff," balloting shall be
used for the general municipal election in November 2007 and all
subsequent elections.
Section 3. The effective date of this ordinance shall be ninety
days after publication.
First reading: January 3, 2006
Second reading: January 17, 2006
Date of Publication: January 26, 2006
Date Ordinance Takes Effect: April 27, 2006
Gene Maxwell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Terry Obermaier, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney Signature
Date
CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
a ORDINANCE 2005-958A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS
UPON RECOMMENDATION OF THE HOPKINS CHARTER COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO M.S.A. CHAPTER 410.12, SUBD. 7
The City'Council of the City of Hopkins, upon recommendation of and
from the Hopkins City Charter Commission does hereby ordain and
thus amend and adopt the following changes, deletions, and
amendments of or from the following chapters and sections of the
Hopkins City Charter:
Section 1. Section 2.03, is amended as follows:
Subdivision 3. After the City general election, the City Council
shall, at their next regularly scheduled meeting, meet as the
canvassing board and declare the results of the election. -T�
e an d!4ateLcee e iv i n ff the h:Ejh e s t nidffib ere f vetes fer a partie'diar
effiee is elect '. If the election results ina tie, then the
winner should be determined by lot in the presence of the Council
acting as the canvassing board.
Section 2. Section 4.04, is added as follows:
SEC. 4.04. INSTANT RUNOFF ELECTIONS.
(a) For the purposes of this section: (1) a candidate
shall be deemed "continuing" if the candidate has not been
eliminated; (2) a ballot shall be deemed "continuing" if it is not
exhausted; and (3) a ballot shall be deemed "exhausted," and not
counted in further stages of the tabulation, if all of the
candidates chosen on that ballot have been eliminated or there are
no more candidates indicated on the ballot. If a ranked -choice
ballot gives equal rank to two or more candidates, the ballot shall
be declared exhausted at the point of the ballot when such multiple
rankings are reached. If a voter casts a ranked -choice ballot but
skips a rank, the voter's vote shall be transferred to that voter's
next ranked choice.
(b) The Mayor and members of the City Council shall be
elected using a ranked -choice, or "instant runoff," ballot. The
ballot shall allow voters to rank a number of choices in order of
preference equal to the total number of candidates for each office;
provided, however, if the voting system, vote tabulation system or
similar or related equipment used by the City and County cannot
feasibly accommodate choices equal to the total number of
candidates running for each office, then the Director of Elections
may limit the number of choices a voter may rank to no fewer than
three. The ballot shall in no way interfere with a voter's ability
to cast a vote for a write-in candidate.
(c) If a candidate receives a majority of the first
choices, that candidate shall be declared elected. If no candidate
receives a majority, the candidate who received the fewest first
choices shall be eliminated and each vote cast for that candidate
shall be transferred to the next ranked candidate on that voter's
ballot, except that if the total number of first choice votes of
the two or more candidates credited with the lowest number of first
choice votes is less than the number of first choice votes credited
to the candidate with.the next highest number of votes, those
candidates with the lowest number of first choice votes shall be
eliminated simultaneously and their first choice votes transferred
to the next -ranked continuing candidate on each ballot in a single
counting operation. If, after this transfer of votes, any
candidate has a majority of the first choice votes from the
continuing ballots, that candidate shall be declared elected.
(d) This process of eliminating candidates and
transferring their votes to the next -ranked continuing candidates
shall be repeated until a candidate receives a majority of the
first choice votes from the _continuing ballots.
(e) The members of the city council shall be elected
sequentially. After the first candidate is elected, the votes shall
be recounted, with any ballots marked for the already elected
candidate now counting for the next ranked candidate on each
ballot.
(f) In the event of a tie between two or more candidates
after any round.of counting, the candidate to be eliminated shall
be determined by lot.
(g) The City Clerk shall conduct a voter education
campaign to familiarize voters with the ranked -choice or, "instant
runoff," method of voting.
(h) Ranked choice, or `instant runoff,' balloting shall be
used for the first municipal election in November 2007 and all
subsequent elections unless the City Clerk certifies to the City
Council no later than four months prior to an election that the
Department will -not be ready to implement ranked -choice balloting
in that election. Such certification must include the reasons why
the Department is not ready to implement ranked -choice balloting.
The City Council shall have the ability to accept the certification
or to -order the Department to implement ranked -choice balloting.
Section 3. The effective date of this ordinance shall be ninety
days after publication.
First reading: January 3, 2006
Second reading: January 17, 2006
Date of Publication: January 26, 2006
Date Ordinance Takes Effect: April 27, 2006
Gene Maxwell, Mayor
ATTEST:
Terry Obermaier, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney Signature
i
Date
UNAPPROVED
Minutes of the Hopkins Charter Commission
April 26, 2005
The Hopkins Charter Commission met on April, 26. Present were Commission members:
Dorothy Boen, David Day, Fran Hesch, Roger Gross, Karen Jensen and Jim Shirley. Assistant
City Manager Jim Genellie was also present.
The meeting was brought to order at 6:37 p.m.
Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting.
Commissioner Gross noted that his name was not on the minutes of June 22. The Commission
directed Mr. Genellie to make this change. Commissioner Gross moved and Commissioner Day
seconded a motion to approve the minutes of June 22, 2004. The Commission voted to approve
the minutes as amended.
Election of Chair and Vice -Chair.
Commissioner Gross moved and Commissioner Day seconded a motion that Fran Hesch be
elected Chair. There were no other nominations. The Commission voted unanimously to elect
Fran Hesch as Chair.
Commissioner Boen moved and Commissioner Day seconded a motion that Roger Gross be
elected Vice -Chair. The Commission voted unanimously to elect Roger Gross as Vice -Chair.
Communications
There were no communications.
At this point in the meeting the Commission decided to address the items under New Business
before it considered the item under Old Business.
New Business
Amendment to Section 12.05 - Sales of Real Property
Section 12.05. SALES OF REAL PROPERTY. No real property of the City shall be
disposed of except by resolution duly adopted by a four -fifths vote of the City Council.
The consideration paid to the City for the sale of any such real property shall be not less
than the fair and reasonable market value of such property as the same may have been
determined by the latest tax assessment rolls of the City subject however for reasonable
adjustment in those cases where the City may retain easements or other rights in such
property. The proceeds of any such sale shall be used for any public purpose which the
Council may by resolution designate.
Mr. Genellie suggested that the Commission vote to eliminate the words: "which the Council
may by resolution designate."
The City of Hopkins does not have much property to sell. Proceeds from the sale of property can
be placed in several City funds. If the revenues were placed in the general fund, for example, they
- 1 -
UNAPPROVED
would be commingled with tax receipts, interest earnings, license fees, etc. Expenditures are
made from these funds over a period of time.
This money, like all City funds, must be spent for a public purpose. Normally the only time the
Council uses a resolution in regard to expenditure of City funds is when it approves the annual
budget.
Several Commission members asked whether removing this wording would change the way that
the money would be spent. Mr. Genellie explained that the City Council would determine how
the money would be spent. The resolution would just be a formality.
Commissioner Boen moved and Commissioner Gross seconded a motion approving this change
to the City Charter. The Commission voted unanimously to approve this change.
Amendments to the By -Laws
Article III
Section 3. The terms of office of each member shall be four years. A Commission
member may only serve two terms. Each member serves, however, until a successor is
appointed and qualified.
Mr. Genellie suggested that the Commission eliminate the two -term limit. The State of
Minnesota revised Minnesota Statute 410 to eliminate the two -term limit on Commissioners. The
City of Hopkins has been eliminating this limit in other Boards and Commissions due to the
difficulty in finding replacement members. Staff believes that there is sufficient turnover on the
Commission that the term limit is unnecessary.
Commissioner Boen moved and Commissioner Jensen seconded a motion approving this change
to the >By -Laws. The Commission voted unanimously to approve this change.
Article IV
Section 2. The term of office for all officers shall be one year on a calendar year
basis.
Mr. Genellie suggested that the Commission change the term of office to two years. During the
first, and occasionally, only meeting of the year the Commission has to elect a chair and vice -
chair. While the existing chair is often re-elected, it is possible that the Commissioner elected as
Chair would serve for only one meeting.
Commissioner Boen moved and Commissioner Shirley seconded a motion approving this change
to the By -Laws. The Commission voted unanimously to approve this change.
Article V
Section 1. Meetings of the Commission shall be held in Hopkins City Hall.
Mr. Genellie suggested that the Commission consider changing this requirement. Due to existing
conflicts the Commission is forced to hold its meetings in a small conference room at City Hall.
Holding meetings at other locations would allow for more room for the Commission and would
accommodate any member of the public that wanted to attend.
-2-
UNAPPROVED
Commissioner Gross moved and Commissioner Boen seconded a motion changing the language
in Article V, Section 1 to " Meetings of the Commission shall be held in a public building
located in the City of Hopkins." The Commission voted unanimously to approve this change.
Old Business
Ranked Ballot Voting
Commissioner Hesch discussed the work of the Alternative Voting Task Force. The preliminary
report to the Commission is complete. Commissioner Hesch said that she was pleased and
impressed with the dedication of the Task Force members. She asked that the Commission agree
to extend the time for the Task Force to complete.its work. She said that while the Commission
had studied alternative voting systems it has not had time to arrive at a recommendation for the
Charter Commission.
Commissioner Shirley asked about the composition of the Task Force, particularly representation
from some political parties and not others. He was concerned that the membership of the Task
Force might be tilted in favor of a change in the voting system. Commissioner Hesch said that
many people were invited to join the Task Force, including members of major political parties. A
number of people agreed to serve but failed to show up for meetings. Commissioner Hesch said
that the Task Force did have input from a number of people who were skeptical about changing
voting systems.
Commission Gross asked where the Task Force would go from here. Commissioner Hesch said
that the Task Force would meet several more times this summer. She asked if the Task Force
} could report back to the Commission in the fall.
Commissioner Jensen moved and Commissioner Gross seconded the motion to approve the
continuation of the work of the Alternative Voting Task Force and setting the date of the next
meeting of the Commission for September 27, 2005. The motion was approved unanimously.
Adi ournment.
Commissioner Boen moved and Commissioner Jensen seconded the motion to adjourn. The
meeting adjourned by unanimous consent.
-3-
CHARTER COMMISSION
September 22, 2005
Name
Term
Term Expires
Dorothy Boen
Second
4/13/2008
David Day
First
9/22/2007
Roger Gross
Second
4/13/2008
Fran Hesch
First
4/7/2006
John Hutchison
First
10/20/2005
Karen Jensen
First*
10/20/2005
Roger Johnson
Second
8/26/2009
Steve Lewis
First
9/26/2008
Jerre Miller
First
9/26/2008
f Robert Miller
First*
4/7/2006
F :=
Emily Wallace -Jackson
First*
3/5/2008
Chair:
Vice -Chair: Fran Hesch
* Filling out unexpired term. Eligible to serve
two more complete terms.
CITY OF HOPKINS
Hennepin County, Minnesota
CHARTER COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-01
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT OF THE
HOPKINS CHARTER BY ORDINANCE
Whereas, the Hopkins Charter Commission has the authority under Minnesota Statute,
Section 410.12, subdivision 7 to recommend amendments to the.City Charter;
and
Whereas, the Commission has determined that the Hopkins City Charter should be
amended;
Now Therefore be it resolved by the Hopkins Charter Commission that the Hopkins
Municipal Charter be amended by Ordinance 2005-958 enacted by the City Council of
the City of Hopkins pursuant to Minnesota Statute 410.12
Passed and adopted at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Hopkins Charter
Commission on September 27, 2005.
:r
ATTEST:
James A. Genellie, Secretary
Hopkins Charter Commission
Fran Hesch, Chair
CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 2005-958
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS
UPON RECOMMENDATION OF THE HOPKINS CHARTER COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO M.S.A. CHAPTER 410.12, SUBD. 7
The City Council of the City of Hopkins, upon recommendation of and
from the Hopkins City Charter Commission does hereby ordain and
thus amend and adopt the following changes, deletions, and
amendments of or from the following chapters and sections of the
Hopkins City Charter:
Section 1. Section 12.05, is amended as follows:
Section 12.05. SALES OF REAL PROPERTY. No real property of the
City shall be disposed of except by resolution duly adopted by a
four -fifths vote of the City Council. The consideration paid to
the City for the sale of any such real property shall.be not less
than the fair and reasonable market value of such property as the
same may have been determined by the latest tax assessment rolls of
the City subject however for reasonable adjustment in those cases
where the City may retain easements or other rights in such
property. The proceeds of any such sale.shall be used for any
public purpose wh4:eh the Gewe=l Eftay Jqy—teeselutlen d«.
J
Section 2. The effective date of this ordinance shall be ninety
days after publication.
First reading:
Second reading:
Date of Publication:
Date Ordinance Takes Effect:
ATTEST:
Terry Obermaier, City Clerk
November 15, 2005
December 6, 2005
December 15, 2005
March 16, 2006
LIM
Gene Maxwell, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney Signature Date