Loading...
Planning & Zoning Packet 06-23-2026HOPKINS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Tuesday, June 23, 2026 6:30 pm THIS AGENDA IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL THE START OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER II. ADOPT AGENDA III. COMMUNITY COMMENT IV. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes of the April 28, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission regular meeting V. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Development Code Text Amendment to reclassify Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops as Conditional Uses in the MX-D Zoning District; Amend provisions related to Cannabis and Hemp Retail, and Window Transparency 2. Development Code Text Amendment to reclassify Short Term Rentals as a permitted use in Neighborhood Zones VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS 1. Election of Officers for 2026-2027 2. Recognition of Outgoing Commissioners VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS IX. ADJOURN HOPKINS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission was held on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Hopkins City Hall, 1010 1st Street South. Chairperson Whitney Terrill called the meeting to order with Commission members Pete Wiechert, Nathan Miller, Joshua Montgomery, Adam Minter, Michael Ujifusa attending. Also present was City Planner Krzos. ADOPT AGENDA Motion by Miller. Second by Minter. Motion Adopt Agenda as presented. Ayes: All Present. Nays: None. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Miller. Second by Weichert. Motion Approve the following: 1. Minutes of the January 27, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission regular meeting. Ayes: All Present. Nays: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. OLD BUSINESS 1. Continued Discussion of Potential Modifications to Zoning Regulations for the MX-D Zone Related to Cannabis Sales, Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops Planner Krzos provided a presentation reviewing the city code amendment for cannabis business regulation and some of the discussion the commission has had on this topic during the November and January meetings. Some items discussed at these meetings include whether having cannabis businesses in the City is consistent with the vision for downtown, should they be regulated differently, should the City reconsider spacing and design requirements and are there any economic development considerations. Commissioner Minter expressed his thoughts about spacing the businesses out throughout the City. HOPKINS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING PROCEEDINGS TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2026 Commissioner Montgomery said he feels the rules for cannabis should be the same as they are for liquor and tobacco and stated he is not for restricting businesses on Mainstreet, the MX-D Zone. Miller stated he would like to see conditional use for all cannabis businesses in the MX- D Zone, which would require businesses to have their license reviewed by the commission and City Council and be accompanied with a public hearing. Ujifusa also stated he would be open to buffers similar to Miller’s suggestions. After Planner Krzos clarified what would be required for the business to be conditional use, Minter stated that these rules would only apply for the last remaining cannabis business, as the other two were already up and running. Montgomery stated because of this, he was not ok with imposing more restrictions on the businesses. With the consensus of the commission in support of having some type of additional regulation for cannabis businesses going in the MX-D zone, Planner Krzos then said he would draft an ordinance for conditional use requirements for the zone and would bring them back for the commission’s review. NEW BUSINESS 1. Public Engagement for the Comprehensive Plan Update Associate Planner Sam Gallagher provided the presentation that features a 20-year vision for the community. ANNOUNCEMENTS Associate Planner Gallagher shared information about upcoming community events, like May being Bike Month. Planner Krzos also announced Commissioner IIstrup resigned from her position as Commissioner. There are now two open positions for the Commission. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning & Zoning Commission and upon a motion by Montgomery, second by Ujifusa, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 7:40 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Kristine Kostuck, Administrative Assistant 1 P&Z Report 2026-02 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Members From: Ryan Krzos, City Planner Date: June 23, 2026 Subject: Development Code Text Amendment to reclassify Cannabis Sales, Off- Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops as Conditional Uses in the MX-D Zoning District; Amend provisions related to Cannabis and Hemp Retail, and Window Transparency _____________________________________________________________________ REQUEST Staff, on behalf of the Planning and Zoning Commission, propose a Development Code Text Amendment to reclassify Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops as Conditional Uses in the MX-D (Mixed-Use Downtown Center) zoning district. The amendment would also modify provisions related to Cannabis and Hemp Retail, and window transparency. This amendment is a follow-up to Planning and Zoning Commission discussions held in January and April 2026 regarding the appropriate regulatory approach for these uses in the downtown environment. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to: 1. Hold a Public Hearing on the Development Code Text Amendment. 2. Consider comments by the public and Staff. 3. By motion, act on a Resolution recommending the City Council adopt the Development Code Text Amendment ANALYSIS Background At the November 25, 2025 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed amendments related to Cannabis Business Registration Requirements and separation standards. During that discussion, the Commission expressed interest in Planning & Development CITY OF HOPKINS 2 revisiting how certain regulated retail uses are treated in the MX-D zoning district, specifically Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops. Subsequent discussions were held at the January 27, 2026 and April 28, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meetings. These discussions focused on whether the current zoning framework adequately supports the long-term vision for Downtown Hopkins as outlined in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and whether additional regulatory tools are needed to address land use compatibility, clustering, and downtown design goals. While the Commission did not reach a formal consensus, several members expressed support for exploring a conditional use approach to provide additional site-specific review of these uses. Proposed Amendment The proposed Development Code Text Amendment includes three primary changes: 1. Reclassify Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops from permitted uses to conditional uses within the MX-D (Mixed-Use Downtown Center) zoning district. 2. Clarify the distinction between Hemp Retail and Cannabis Retail uses, maintaining the existing status for Hemp sales. 3. Establish storefront window transparency standards applicable to businesses in the MX-D district. Reclassification of Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops The proposed amendment would reclassify the following uses as conditional uses within the MX-D zoning district: • Cannabis Sales • Off-Sale Liquor Stores • Tobacco Shops As conditional uses, these businesses would require approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) prior to establishment or relocation within the MX-D district. The CUP process provides an opportunity to evaluate factors such as site context, surrounding land uses, and compatibility with downtown objectives before a use is established. Conditional use applications are reviewed through a public process that includes a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission and final action by the City Council. In making its decision, the City Council must determine that the proposed use meets the City's general Conditional Use Permit criteria: 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and purposes of the Development Code. 3 2. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code. 3. The proposed conditional use will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Conditional Use Permit Review Standards During discussion of the proposed ordinance amendments, the Planning & Zoning Commission expressed interest in establishing specific review criteria for Conditional Use Permit applications involving cannabis retail businesses in the MX-D District. While the zoning code contains use-specific standards for certain conditional uses, those standards generally apply to land uses with unique operational or locational characteristics, such as requirements related to roadway access, site design, or operational performance. Similar use-specific standards do not currently exist for retail uses in the MX-D District. The City Attorney has advised that establishing cannabis-specific review criteria could create legal concerns by subjecting one retail use to discretionary standards that do not apply to other similarly situated retail uses. In addition, Minnesota law does not specifically authorize municipalities to establish additional discretionary review standards for cannabis retailers beyond the City's general zoning authority. Accordingly, Cannabis Retail Conditional Use Permit applications would be evaluated using the same general Conditional Use Permit criteria that apply to other conditional uses within the MX-D District. Window Transparency Requirements Rather than establishing cannabis-specific design standards, staff recommends addressing storefront visibility through generally applicable development standards applicable to all storefront buildings within the MX-D District. The proposed amendment would require first-floor storefront windows to remain unobstructed for a minimum depth of three feet into nonresidential tenant spaces. Merchandise displays would continue to be permitted, provided displays and signage do not occupy more than 30 percent of the window area. This standard is currently applied to Pawn Shops and is similar to regulations found in Minneapolis, Saint Paul, and Saint Louis Park. The purpose of the requirement is to support Downtown design goals related to transparency, pedestrian engagement, and active storefront character. Hemp Retail and Cannabis Retail Classifications The proposed amendment would create separate use classifications for Hemp Retail and Cannabis Retail. 4 Hemp Retail would remain a permitted use in zoning districts where retail uses are currently allowed, including the P2 (Public and Institutional) District. As a result, existing businesses that sell hemp-derived edible products, such as bars, restaurants, and golf course facilities, would not be affected by the amendment. Cannabis Retail would become a conditional use in the MX-D District and would be prohibited in the P2 District. This distinction recognizes the different regulatory frameworks governing hemp-derived products and cannabis products while maintaining the City's current approach toward businesses that sell hemp-derived edibles. Planning Context The Downtown section of the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan establishes a vision for Downtown Hopkins as a vibrant, walkable, and welcoming mixed-use district that serves as both the economic and social center of the community. The plan emphasizes preserving Downtown’s unique character, supporting small and locally owned businesses, encouraging active pedestrian-oriented storefronts, and fostering a business mix that contributes to a strong sense of place and community identity. The MX-D zoning district was established in the 2022 Zoning Code update to implement this vision. The MX-D district is intended to promote an active pedestrian environment, a diverse mix of uses, and high-quality urban design that supports downtown vitality. Existing Zoning Currently, the uses in question are regulated in the MX-D district as follows: Use Current Status in MX-D Key Regulations Cannabis Sales Permitted Registration cap (3), state stipulated separation standards Off-Sale Liquor Stores Permitted License cap, 5,000 sq. ft. maximum Tobacco Shops Permitted Separation requirements (500 ft) Community Input and Engagement: • No community members commented on this item as of the writing of this report. • Staff will provide an update to the Planning and Zoning Commission on all public comments received during the public hearing. Engagement Activities: • Planning and Zoning Commission discussion sessions (January and April 2026) • The Planning and Zoning Commission’s public hearing. 5 • Published notice of this public hearing in the City’s official paper. Review Criteria: Staff finds that the proposed development code amendment meets the criteria for approval. In making decisions about code amendments, the City must consider all relevant factors, including at least the following criteria: 1. Whether the proposed Development Code text amendment is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies Downtown Hopkins as a vibrant, walkable, mixed-use center that serves as the economic, civic, and social heart of the community. The plan emphasizes maintaining an active pedestrian environment, supporting a diverse mix of businesses, preserving downtown character, and encouraging high-quality storefront design. The MX-D zoning district was established to implement this vision through pedestrian-oriented development standards and a mix of commercial, residential, civic, and cultural uses. The proposed amendment does not prohibit Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, or Tobacco Shops within the MX-D District. Rather, it establishes a Conditional Use Permit process that allows the City to evaluate individual proposals based on site-specific circumstances and their compatibility with surrounding uses and downtown objectives. The amendment also includes storefront transparency standards intended to support an active and engaging pedestrian environment. Staff finds that this criterion is met. 2. Whether the proposed Development Code text amendment corrects an error or inconsistency or will help meet the challenge of a changed or changing condition. Since adoption of the 2022 Zoning Code update, the City has gained additional experience with evolving retail market conditions, changing state regulations, and the introduction of state-regulated cannabis businesses. Through multiple discussions, the Planning & Zoning Commission expressed interest in evaluating whether the current zoning framework provides sufficient opportunity to consider site-specific compatibility issues for certain regulated retail uses within Downtown Hopkins. The Commission also discussed how storefront design and transparency contribute to the pedestrian-oriented character envisioned for the MX-D District. 6 The proposed amendment responds to these changing conditions by providing an additional review mechanism for Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops while establishing generally applicable storefront transparency standards that support the vision and goals for downtown Hopkins. Staff finds that this criterion is met. Staff finds that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, responds to changing regulatory and market conditions, and provides an appropriate mechanism to evaluate certain regulated retail uses within the MX-D District. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment. Alternatives Development Code Text Amendments are considered legislative action. The City has broad discretion in establishing land use regulations, provided they are reasonable and promote the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Planning and Zoning Commission could consider the following alternatives: • Recommend approval of the amendment as proposed • Recommend approval with modifications (e.g., limited MX-D subareas, additional standards, or hybrid permitted/conditional approach) • Recommend denial of the proposal. Since this matter was originated by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Amendment would not be brought forward for a City Council decision should this alternative be approved. NEXT STEPS If a recommendation to approve an Ordinance is made, the City Council will consider a first reading at their July 14th meeting. A second reading of the Ordinance and publication in the City’s Newspaper is required to officially enact the Ordinance. 1 CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XXXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT CODE TO RECLASSIFY OFF-SALE LIQOUR SALES, TOBACCO SALES ESTABLISHMENTS, AND CANNABIS RETAIL AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE MX-D ZONE, AMEND PROVISIONS RELATED TO CANNABIS AND HEMP RETAIL USES, AND WINDOW TRANSPARENCY SECTION 1. Article 5, Section 102-510 (a), Table 5-1 is hereby amended by adding the double-underlined language, as follows: Table 5-1. Principal Use Table ZONES Reference MX-TOD MX-D MX-N MX-S RX-TOD RX-D RX-N IX-TOD I-TOD IX-S I1 N1, N2 N3-A N3-B NX1 NX2 P1 P2 RESIDENTIAL 102-530 Household Living, 1 unit ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – ● ● ● ● ● – – Household Living, 2 units ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – Household Living, 3–4 units ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – ● ● – – Household Living, 5+ units ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – – ● – – Manufactured Home Park – – – – – – – – – – – – ○ ○ ○ ○ – – Group Living (except as below) ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – ○ ○ – – Residential Facility, Small ● ● ● ● ● ● ● – – – – ● ● ● ● ● – – 102-580 (h) Residential Facility, Large ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ – – – – – – – ○ ○ – – 102-580 (h) COMMERCIAL 102-540 Adult-Oriented Business – – – ● – – – – – ● ● – – – – – – – Animal Boarding – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – Consumer Service ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● – – – – – – ◐ Day Care, Adult ● ◓ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● – – – – ○ ○ – ● Day Care, Small ● ◓ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – ● ● ● ● ● – – Day Care, Large ● ◓ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – ● – – – – ○ ○ – – Entertainment Venue, Large – – – ● – ● – ● – ● – – – – – – ○ ● Funeral & Mortuary Service – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lodging (except as below) ● ◓ ◓ ● ● ● ● – – ● – – – – – – – – Short-Term Rental ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ – – 102-580 (h) Office ◑ ◑ ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (d) Personal Credit Establishment ○ – – ○ – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (g) Retail & Entertainment (except as ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – ◐ 2 below) Brewpub – ● ● ● – ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (a) Firearms Sales Establishment – – – ○ – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (b) Liquor Sales, Off-Sale ● ●○ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (e) Tobacco Sales Establishment ● ●○ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (j) Self-Service Storage – – – – – – – ○ – – ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (l) Vehicle Sales & Service (except as below) – – – ○ – – – – ○ ○ ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (n) Major Vehicle Repair & Maintenance – – – – – – – – ○ ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (n) MANUFACTURING & INDUSTRY 102-550 Manufacturing, Artisan ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – Manufacturing, Limited – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – High-Impact Industry – – – – – – – – – – ● – – – – – – – Urban Farm – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – ● – 102-580 (l) Warehousing & Distribution – – – – – – – – ● ● ● – – – – – – – CIVIC & INSTITUTIONAL 102-560 College ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – – – ● Community Assembly ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – – – – ○ Cultural Facility ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● – – – – – – ● ● Community Garden ● – ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 102-580 (c) Detention or Correctional Facility – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – ○ Hospital – – – – ○ ○ – – – – – – – – – – – ● Parks and Open Space – – ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ○ – – – – ● ● 102-580 (f) School ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – – – – ○ Utilities & Services, Minor ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 102-580 (m) Utilities & Services, Major ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 102-580 (m) OTHER 102-570 Wireless Communication Facility 102-580 (o) Tower – – – – – – – – – – ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (o) Cannabis Businesses Cannabis & Hemp Retail ● ●○ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Hemp Retail ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – ◐ 102-580 (p) Cannabis Cultivation, Small-scale ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis Cultivation, Large-scale – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis & Hemp Product Manufacturing, Small-scale ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis & Hemp Product Manufacturing, Large-scale – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis Wholesale & Transportation – – – – – – – – ● ● ● – – – – – – – KEY: ● = Permitted ◓ = Permitted in Upper Stories Only ◐ = Limited to No More than 25% of Building Area ◑ = Limited on first floor to buildings on the interior of a block see 102-580 (d) ○ = Requires Conditional Use Approval – = Prohibited 3 SECTION 2. Article 5, Section 102-570 (b)(1)(a) is hereby amended by deleting the striken language and adding the double-underlined language, as follows: a. Cannabis and Hemp Retail. A cannabis retailer and the retail location(s) of a mezzobusiness with a retail operations endorsement, microbusinesses with a retail operations endorsement, medical combination businesses operating a retail location, or lower potency hemp edible retailers, as defined under Minn. Stat. 342.01. Such uses are subject to the supplemental use regulations of 102-580(p). a. Cannabis and Hemp Retail. The cannabis and hemp retail use category includes sale-licensed uses involved in the retail sale of cannabis and hemp products. Such uses are subject to the supplemental use regulations of 102-580(p). The cannabis and hemp retail use category includes the following subcategories: 1. Cannabis Retail. A business with a cannabis retailer license, cannabis retail endorsement, or other approval from the Office of Cannabis Management. 2. Hemp Retail. A business licensed as a lower-potency hemp edible retailer by the Office of Cannabis Management. SECTION 3. Article 5, Section 102-580 (p)(1) is hereby amended by deleting the striken language and adding the double-underlined language, as follows: 102-580 (p) CANNABIS BUSINESS USES (1) Cannabis and Hemp Retail. Cannabis and Hemp Retail uses are subject to the following supplemental use regulations: a. Setbacks as established in City Code, section 10-653. b. Retailers are permitted to erect up to two fixed signs on the exterior of the building or property of the business, in compliance with the regulations of Article 10. c. Accessory Delivery of cannabis and cannabis products is allowed provided the business is licensed for such activity. d. An Accessory Lounge is allowed for a cannabis microbusiness business with an on-site consumption endorsement. An Accessory Lounge means a portion of the premise for consumption of edible cannabis products and lower-potency hemp edibles subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. 342.28 subd 10. e. Requirements established in City Code, Chapter 11, Article XVIII. SECTION 4. Article 7, Section 102-750 (b)(4) is hereby amended by deleting the striken language and adding the double-underlined language, as follows: 4 (4) Visibility Through Glass. Reflective glass and glass block are prohibited on street and other front facades. Windows shall be clear or lightly tinted and meet the transmittance and reflectance factors established in the transparency definition (see 102-1620 (m)). Additionally, first floor windows on storefront buildings must be free of obstruction for at least three feet into nonresidential spaces in the building. Products may be displayed in such windows, provided the display, including signage, does not occupy more than 30% of the window area. SECTION 5. In accordance with Section 3.03 of the City Charter and Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 4, due to the significant length of this Ordinance, City staff shall have the following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance: On August 3, 2026, the Hopkins City Council adopted a Second Reading of Ordinance 2026-XXX that amends Articles 5 and 7 of the Hopkins Development Code to reclassify Off-Sale Liquor Sales, Tobacco Sales Establishments, and Cannabis Retail as conditional uses in the MX-D zone. The Ordinance also establishes use subcategories of Hemp Retail and Cannabis Retail; and clarifies provisions around window transparency. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours at Hopkins City Hall and is available online at the City’s web site located at www.hopkinsmn.com. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this ordinance shall be the date of publication. First Reading: July 14, 2026 Second Reading: August 3, 2026 Date of Publication: August 3, 2026 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: August 13, 2026 By: ____________________________ Patrick Hanlon, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-02 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT CODE TO RECLASSIFY CANNABIS AND HEMP SALES, OFF-SALE LIQUOR SALES, AND TOBACCO SALES ESTABLISHMENTS AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE MX-D ZONE, AND AMEND PROVISIONS RELATED TO CANNABIS AND HEMP RETAIL USES AND WINDOW TRANSPARENCY WHEREAS, the Hopkins Development Code is intended to establish development standards that implement the community vision and advance the goals and policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Cultivate Hopkins; and WHEREAS, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan establishes a vision for Downtown Hopkins as a vibrant, walkable, mixed-use district that serves as the economic, civic, and social center of the community and emphasizes pedestrian activity, high-quality storefront design, a diverse mix of businesses, and preservation of downtown character; and WHEREAS, the MX-D, Mixed-Use Downtown Center zoning district was established to implement this vision by encouraging a pedestrian-oriented environment and a diverse mix of commercial, residential, civic, and cultural uses; and WHEREAS, Cannabis and Hemp Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Sales, and Tobacco Sales Establishments are currently listed as a permitted use in the MX-D, Mixed-Use Downtown Center Zone; and WHEREAS, City Staff, on behalf of the Planning and Zoning Commission, has proposed a Development Code Text Amendment to: 1. Reclassify Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, and Tobacco Shops as conditional uses within the MX-D zoning district; 2. Establish separate use classifications for Hemp Retail and Cannabis Retail; 3. Prohibit Cannabis Retail within the P2 (Public and Institutional) zoning district while maintaining existing allowances for Hemp Retail; and 4. Establish storefront window transparency standards applicable within the MX-D zoning district; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the Development Code Text Amendment is as follows: 1. That the above stated Development Code Text Amendment was initiated by City Staff on behalf of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and, 2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on June 23, 2026 and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the analysis provided in the Planning & Zoning Report 2026-02 dated June 23, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Hopkins hereby recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Development Code Text Amendment based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed zoning text amendment is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. a. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies Downtown Hopkins as a vibrant, walkable, mixed-use center and emphasizes active storefronts, pedestrian activity, high- quality design, and a diverse mix of businesses. b. The proposed amendment does not prohibit Cannabis Sales, Off-Sale Liquor Stores, or Tobacco Shops within the MX-D District, but instead establishes a Conditional Use Permit process that allows the City to evaluate site-specific circumstances and compatibility with surrounding uses and downtown objectives. c. The proposed window transparency standards support the Comprehensive Plan's goals related to pedestrian engagement, active storefronts, and downtown vitality. 2. The proposed zoning text amendment helps address a changed or changing condition. a. Since adoption of the 2022 Zoning Code update, the City has gained additional experience with evolving retail market conditions, changing state regulations, and the introduction of state-regulated cannabis businesses. b. The proposed amendment provides a mechanism for evaluating certain regulated retail uses on a site-specific basis while maintaining their ability to locate within the MX-D District. c. The amendment also establishes generally applicable storefront design standards that support the long-term vision and goals for Downtown Hopkins. 3. The proposed amendment promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare by providing additional review of certain regulated retail uses while supporting an active, pedestrian-oriented downtown environment consistent with the City's planning objectives. Adopted this 23rd day of June 2026. __________________________________ Whitney Terrill, Chairperson 1 P&Z Report 2026-05 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Members From: Sam Gallagher, Associate Planner Date: June 23, 2026 Subject: Development Code Text Amendment to reclassify Short Term Rentals as a permitted use in Neighborhood Zones _____________________________________________________________________ REQUEST Staff propose an amendment to the Development Code regulations modifying the regulations for short-term rentals (STRs). Proposed Requirement: Short-term rentals are permitted in neighborhood zones subject to licensing requirements and supplemental use regulations. Current Requirement: Short-term rentals in neighborhood zones require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in addition to licensing requirements. Purpose of Amendment: Eliminate the Conditional Use Permit requirement while retaining the City's licensing, inspection, and operational regulations for short-term rentals. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission is asked to: 1. Hold a Public Hearing on the Development Code Amendment. 2. Consider comments by the public and Staff. 3. By motion approve a Resolution recommending the City Council adopt the Development Code Amendment for Short-term Rentals. ANALYSIS Background and Recent Experience The growth of online platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo has expanded the short-term rental (STR) market and prompted communities across the country, including Hopkins, to consider how these uses should be regulated. Since adoption of the 2022 Zoning Code update, two applications for Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) for STRs have been reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission Planning & Development CITY OF HOPKINS 1 and City Council, in 2022 and 2025. These applications provided an opportunity to evaluate the City's regulatory framework in practice. During the review process, discussions focused on neighborhood character, housing availability, nuisance enforcement, unpermitted STR activity, and the City's ability to administer a fair and consistent approval process. Staff has not received complaints regarding nuisance activity or noncompliance associated with permitted STRs in Hopkins. Following approval of the most recent STR CUP, the City Council directed staff to explore allowing STRs as a permitted use in neighborhood zoning districts. Limitations of the Conditional Use Permit Process Staff believe the Conditional Use Permit process is not ideally suited to regulating STRs because many concerns associated with STRs relate to the future behavior of guests and ongoing operational characteristics rather than the physical characteristics of a property. A Conditional Use Permit is intended to evaluate whether a use is appropriate for a particular property based on objective land use considerations and established approval criteria. In the context of STRs, concerns often relate to issues such as noise, parking, occupancy, and property management practices. Evaluating these concerns during a CUP review requires decision-makers to make assumptions about the behavior of future guests, making it difficult to apply approval criteria consistently and objectively from one application to another. Additionally, a CUP runs with the property and remains valid so long as its conditions are met. This limits the City's ability to adapt operational requirements over time in response to changing market conditions, community feedback, or emerging trends. Staff believe that the licensing framework with clearly defined operational standards is an effective and legally defensible mechanism for regulating STRs, monitoring compliance, and addressing community concerns on an ongoing basis. Existing Regulatory Framework Prior to the 2022 Zoning Code update, STRs were not specifically addressed in City Code. Beginning in 2018, staff administratively regulated STRs in a manner similar to bed and breakfast establishments because of their comparable operational characteristics. During the code update process STRs were studied in greater detail and ultimately established as a distinct land use with specific regulations. The current regulatory framework is summarized below. Current Requirements STRs are currently subject to three layers of regulation: Zoning regulations, Rental licensing requirements, and general nuisance ordinances. Short-term rentals (STRs) are considered by zoning code to be a form of lodging. Lodging is described as “establishments that provide temporary lodging for less than 30 days to transient guests who maintain a permanent place of residence elsewhere.” STRs are defined as “all or portion of a residential dwelling unit offered for rent to overnight guests for fewer than 30 consecutive days.” 2 STRs are permitted in non-industrial mixed-use zones, conditional in neighborhood zones, and prohibited in all other zones. All permitted STRs in the City are subject to the Supplemental Use Regulations established by the code, which are: 1. Short-term rentals must comply with all applicable licensing and permit requirements of the city and Hennepin County. 2. No more than 6 adults and their dependent children may occupy rooms within a short-term rental. 3. Short-term rentals are not permitted on lots occupied by accessory dwelling units. 4. External structural alterations or site improvements that change the residential character of the lot upon which a short-term rental is located are prohibited. Examples of such prohibited alterations include the construction of a parking lot, the addition of commercial-like exterior lighting, and signage. 5. A register of short-term rental guests must be maintained and made available to the city upon request. 6. Short-term rentals may not be used for special events to be attended by individuals who are not registered guests of the short-term rental unit. The City Code’s rental licensing requirements apply to STRs in the same manner as any other rental dwelling unit. Licensing requirements include an annual fee based on property type (single family, two units, three units or more), initial inspection, and routine rental inspections every one to five years, based on the grade of the initial inspection. A rental property may be inspected at any time between routine inspections on a compliant basis to the City. The City’s general nuisance ordinances regarding noise, trash, and parking all apply to properties used for STR the same way they do for all other properties in the City. These ordinances reinforce the expectation to be a good neighbor and grant the City authority to stop in if nuisances persist. Peer Communities: Staff surveyed STR regulations of similar and nearby communities: City Regulation Notes St Louis Park STRs are not permitted. Edina STRs are not permitted. Minnetonka New ordinance adopted by City Council will take effect on January 1, 2027, that STRs are permitted provided the property is homesteaded. All properties must comply with the City’s 3 building code and nuisance ordinance. Eden Prairie STRs are not regulated differently from long-term rental units. An annual rental license is required for all rental properties and is non- transferable. Minneapolis STRs are permitted in residential zones with a restriction that a property owner can have one short-term rental property in addition to their homestead property. In buildings with 20 or more units, no more than 10 percent of units can be STRs. Richfield No STR may be rented be for a term of less than five days unless the licensee resides on site and is present during the term. Modified in 2025 Plymouth STRs are permitted with a City license STR operators must complete a training: view on YouTube. Peer communities utilize a range of approaches for regulating short-term rentals, from outright prohibition to licensing-based regulatory frameworks. Communities that allow STRs have administrative licensing models that focus on operational standards and enforcement rather than discretionary land use approvals. The factors driving these approaches vary among communities. Some communities prioritize mitigating neighborhood impacts associated with tourism and visitor activity, while others focus on preserving housing supply and affordability, or a combination thereof. Based on Hopkins' experience administering its short-term rental regulations, staff has not identified significant nuisance issues associated with permitted short-term rentals, nor has there been substantial interest in establishing short-term rentals within the community. As a result, staff do not find that current conditions warrant a more restrictive regulatory approach. However, should market conditions, housing trends, or operational impacts change over time, the City would retain the ability to revisit its regulatory framework and consider additional regulations as appropriate. Community Input and Engagement: Public Comments • Two community members jointly contacted and met with staff regarding STRs. Topics discussed included the City's current STR regulations and potential impacts on neighborhood character, neighbor relationships, and potential impacts to adjacent properties associated with transient lodging activity. The residents expressed concerns that STRs can diminish neighborhood cohesion and specifically requested that the City prohibit STRs in Hopkins. • Staff will provide an update to the Planning and Zoning Commission on any additional public comments received during the public hearing. 4 Engagement Actions: • The Planning and Zoning Commission’s public hearing. • Published notice of this public hearing in the City’s official paper. Review Criteria: Staff find that the proposed code amendment meets the criteria for approval. In making decisions about development code text amendments, the City must consider all relevant factors, including at least the following criteria: 1. Whether the proposed Development Code text amendment is in conformity with the comprehensive plan. The development code amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan’s Housing Section provides goals for maintaining the quality and safety of the overall housing stock, and maintaining a choice of quality housing options, including those meeting the needs of a variety of household types and life stages. The proposed amendment maintains opportunities for homeowners to utilize their properties for short-term rental purposes while preserving the City's existing licensing, inspection, and nuisance enforcement mechanisms. Staff finds that the amendment supports the Comprehensive Plan's goals related to housing choice and flexibility while maintaining appropriate safeguards for neighborhood compatibility. Staff finds that this criterion is met. 2. Whether the proposed Development Code text amendment corrects an error or inconsistency or will help meet the challenge of a changed or changing condition. The proposed development code amendment responds to experience gained through administration of the City's short-term rental regulations since adoption of the 2022 Zoning Code update. Through review of two Conditional Use Permit applications, staff has found that the Conditional Use Permit process is not ideally suited to regulating short-term rentals because many of the concerns associated with these uses relate to operational characteristics and the behavior of future guests rather than objective land use impacts. Staff finds that allowing short-term rentals as a permitted use in neighborhood zoning districts, while retaining the City's licensing and operational regulations, provides a more consistent and effective regulatory framework and better positions the City to adapt regulations in response to changing conditions over time. Additionally, the proposed amendment would eliminate the need for a discretionary Conditional Use Permit approval while maintaining existing licensing, inspection, and enforcement requirements. Staff finds that a licensing-based approach provides a more efficient and predictable process for property owners while continuing to provide the City with the tools 5 necessary to monitor compliance, address nuisance concerns, and enforce operational standards. Staff finds that this criterion is met. Alternatives: Development Code Text Amendments are considered legislative action. The City has a wide degree of discretion in creating legislation, but it must be reasonable and promote public health, safety, and/or general welfare. The Planning and Zoning Commission could consider the following alternatives: • Recommend modifications to the proposal. • Recommend denial of the proposal. NEXT STEPS The City Council will consider the Planning and Zoning Commission’s recommendation at their July 14th meeting. The Council may vote to approve a first reading of the Ordinance at that time. A second reading of the Ordinance, and publication of the ordinance amendment in the City’s official paper is required to make the changes effective. 1 CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2026-1234 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT CODE ALLOWING SHORT TERM RENTALS AS A PERMITTED USE IN NEIGHBORHOOD ZONES SECTION 1. Article 5, Section 102-510 (a), Table 5-1 is hereby amended by deleting the striken language and adding the double-underlined language, as follows: Table 5-1. Principal Use Table ZONES Reference MX-TOD MX-D MX-N MX-S RX-TOD RX-D RX-N IX-TOD I-TOD IX-S I1 N1, N2 N3-A N3-B NX1 NX2 P1 P2 RESIDENTIAL 102-530 Household Living, 1 unit ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – ● ● ● ● ● – – Household Living, 2 units ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – Household Living, 3–4 units ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – ● ● – – Household Living, 5+ units ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – – ● – – Manufactured Home Park – – – – – – – – – – – – ○ ○ ○ ○ – – Group Living (except as below) ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – ○ ○ – – Residential Facility, Small ● ● ● ● ● ● ● – – – – ● ● ● ● ● – – 102-580 (h) Residential Facility, Large ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ – – – – – – – ○ ○ – – 102-580 (h) COMMERCIAL 102-540 Adult-Oriented Business – – – ● – – – – – ● ● – – – – – – – Animal Boarding – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – Consumer Service ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● – – – – – – ◐ Day Care, Adult ● ◓ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● – – – – ○ ○ – ● Day Care, Small ● ◓ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – ● ● ● ● ● – – Day Care, Large ● ◓ ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – ● – – – – ○ ○ – – Entertainment Venue, Large – – – ● – ● – ● – ● – – – – – – ○ ● Funeral & Mortuary Service – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Lodging (except as below) ● ◓ ◓ ● ● ● ● – – ● – – – – – – – – Short-Term Rental ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – ○● ○● ○● ○● ○● – – 102-580 (h) Office ◑ ◑ ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (d) Personal Credit Establishment ○ – – ○ – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (g) Retail & Entertainment (except as below) ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – ◐ Brewpub – ● ● ● – ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (a) 2 Firearms Sales Establishment – – – ○ – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (b) Liquor Sales, Off-Sale ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (e) Tobacco Sales Establishment ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (j) Self-Service Storage – – – – – – – ○ – – ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (l) Vehicle Sales & Service (except as below) – – – ○ – – – – ○ ○ ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (n) Major Vehicle Repair & Maintenance – – – – – – – – ○ ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (n) MANUFACTURING & INDUSTRY 102-550 Manufacturing, Artisan ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – Manufacturing, Limited – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – High-Impact Industry – – – – – – – – – – ● – – – – – – – Urban Farm – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – ● – 102-580 (l) Warehousing & Distribution – – – – – – – – ● ● ● – – – – – – – CIVIC & INSTITUTIONAL 102-560 College ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – – – ● Community Assembly ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – – – – ○ Cultural Facility ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● – – – – – – ● ● Community Garden ● – ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 102-580 (c) Detention or Correctional Facility – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – ○ Hospital – – – – ○ ○ – – – – – – – – – – – ● Parks and Open Space – – ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ○ – – – – ● ● 102-580 (f) School ◓ ◓ ◓ ◓ ● ● ● – – – – – – – – – – ○ Utilities & Services, Minor ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 102-580 (m) Utilities & Services, Major ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 102-580 (m) OTHER 102-570 Wireless Communication Facility 102-580 (o) Tower – – – – – – – – – – ○ – – – – – – – 102-580 (o) Cannabis Businesses Cannabis & Hemp Retail ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ◐ – – – – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis Cultivation, Small-scale ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis Cultivation, Large-scale – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis & Hemp Product Manufacturing, Small-scale ● ● ● ● ◐ ◐ ◐ ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis & Hemp Product Manufacturing, Large-scale – – – – – – – ● ● ● ● – – – – – – – 102-580 (p) Cannabis Wholesale & Transportation – – – – – – – – ● ● ● – – – – – – – KEY: ● = Permitted ◓ = Permitted in Upper Stories Only ◐ = Limited to No More than 25% of Building Area ◑ = Limited on first floor to buildings on the interior of a block see 102-580 (d) ○ = Requires Conditional Use Approval – = Prohibited SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 3.03 of the City Charter and Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 4, due to the significant length of this Ordinance, City staff shall have the 3 following summary printed in the official City newspaper in lieu of the complete ordinance: On August 3, 2026, the Hopkins City Council adopted Ordinance 2026-1234 that amends Article 5 of the Hopkins Development Code to reclassify Short Term Rentals as a permitted use in Neighborhood Zones. A printed copy of the ordinance is available for inspection during regular business hours at Hopkins City Hall and is available online at the City’s web site located at www.hopkinsmn.com. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this ordinance shall be the date of publication. First Reading: July 14, 2026 Second Reading: August 3, 2026 Date of Publication: August 3, 2026 Date Ordinance Takes Effect: August 13, 2026 By: ____________________________ Patrick Hanlon, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________ Amy Domeier, City Clerk CITY OF HOPKINS HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2026-03 A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HOPKINS DEVELOPMENT CODE TO RECLASSIFY SHORT TERM RENTALS AS A PERMITTED USE IN NEIGHBORHOOD ZONES WHEREAS, the Hopkins Development Code is intended to establish the development standards to implement the community vision and enact the vision, goals and policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Cultivate Hopkins; and WHEREAS, the Plan’s Land Use Section provides goals for maintaining the quality safety and character of the existing housing stock, and maintaining a choice of quality housing options, including those meeting the needs of a variety of household types and life stages; and WHEREAS, City staff is requesting a Development Code Text Amendment to reclassify Short-Term Rental as a permitted use in Neighborhood zones to encourage fulfillment of the goals and vision of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the Development Code Text Amendment is as follows: 1. That the above stated Development Code Text Amendment was initiated by the City; and, 2. That the Hopkins Planning & Zoning Commission, pursuant to published notice, held a public hearing on the application and reviewed such application on June 23, 2026 and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard; and, 3. That written comments and analysis of City staff were considered; and, WHEREAS, staff recommended approval of the above stated application based on the findings outlined in the Planning & Zoning Report 2026-05 dated June 23, 2026. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Hopkins hereby recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Development Code Text Amendment based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed zoning text amendment is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. a. The development code amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan’s Housing Section provides goals for maintaining the quality and safety of the overall housing stock, and maintaining a choice of quality housing options, including those meeting the needs of a variety of household types and life stages. b. The proposed amendment maintains opportunities for homeowners to utilize their properties for short-term rental purposes while preserving the City's existing licensing, inspection, and nuisance enforcement mechanisms. Staff finds that the amendment supports the Comprehensive Plan's goals related to housing choice and flexibility while maintaining appropriate safeguards for neighborhood compatibility. c. The proposed zoning text amendment helps address a changed or changing condition. 2. The proposed Development Code text amendment corrects an error or inconsistency or will help meet the challenge of a changed or changing condition. a. The proposed development code amendment responds to experience gained through administration of the City's short-term rental regulations since adoption of the 2022 Zoning Code update. Through review of two Conditional Use Permit applications, staff has found that the Conditional Use Permit process is not ideally suited to regulating short-term rentals because many of the concerns associated with these uses relate to operational characteristics and the behavior of future guests rather than objective land use impacts. Staff finds that allowing short-term rentals as a permitted use in neighborhood zoning districts, while retaining the City's licensing and operational regulations, provides a more consistent and effective regulatory framework and better positions the City to adapt regulations in response to changing conditions over time. b. Additionally, the proposed amendment would eliminate the need for a discretionary Conditional Use Permit approval while maintaining existing licensing, inspection, and enforcement requirements. Staff finds that a licensing- based approach provides a more efficient and predictable process for property owners while continuing to provide the City with the tools necessary to monitor compliance, address nuisance concerns, and enforce operational standards. 3. The proposed amendment promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare by regulating short-term rentals through a licensing and enforcement framework that provides ongoing oversight, supports consistent administration, and enables the City to address operational impacts and community concerns. Adopted this 23rd day of June 2026. __________________________________ Whitney Terrill, Chair 1 CITY OF HOPKINS To: Planning and Zoning Commission Chair and Members of the Commission From: Ryan Krzos, City Planner Date: June 23, 2026 Subject: Election of Planning and Zoning Commission Officers for 2026-2027 _____________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDED ACTION BY SEPARATE MOTION: nominate and elect Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission OVERVIEW Pursuant to the Planning & Zoning Commission Bylaws, the Commission annually elects a Chair and Vice-Chair to serve a one-year term. The Chair presides over meetings and performs duties assigned by the Bylaws and Commission. The Vice-Chair serves in the Chair's absence and assumes the duties of the Chair when necessary. Officers elected at the June 23, 2026 meeting will assume their positions beginning with the July 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and serve until their successors are elected. Election Procedure 1. The current Chair will open nominations for the office of Chair. • Nominations do not require a second. 2. After nominations are received, a motion and second are required to close nominations. 3. The Commission will vote to close nominations. 4. If a single nominee is presented, the Commission may elect the nominee by unanimous consent. 5. If multiple nominees are presented, the Commission will vote on the nominees and elect the candidate receiving the most votes. 6. The process will then be repeated for the office of Vice-Chair. If only one nomination is made, the following motion could be used: "Move to elect _____________ by unanimous consent to the position of Chairperson." • A second to the motion is necessary. • Ayes/Nays are needed. Planning & Development 2 If more than one nomination is made: • The current Chairperson will request a show of hands for each nominee and record the votes. • Based upon the show of hands, a motion should be made by the Chairperson: "Move that ________________ is elected to the position of Chairperson.” • A second to the motion is necessary. • Ayes/Nays are needed.