11-1-1977 Extract of minutes at nil
T. G. EVENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Municipal Finance Consultants
First National Bank Building
1 11 411; Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612/336 1637
R E S ULT S 0 F SALE $400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS
OF 1977
CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
NOVEMBER 1, 1977 MOODY'S A-1
BIDDERS ADDRESS RATE PRICE NIC
E. J. PRESCOTT, A Division of 4.00%-1980 $396,386.00 $135,797 .75
Carleton D. Beh Co. Minneapolis 4.10%-1981 4.68268%
4.20%-1982
4.30%-1983
4.40%-1984
4.50%-1985
4.60%-1986/87
4.75%-1988/89
,
ST NATIONAL BANK OF SAINT PAUL St. Paul 4.00%-1980 $396,456.00 $137,657.77
st National Bank of Hopkins Hopkins 4.25%-1981/82 4.7468%
4.35%-1983
4.45%-1984
4.55%-1985
4.65%-1986
4.75%-1987
4.80%-1988/89
DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC. Minneapolis 4.25%-1980/82 $395,997 .00 $138,848.00
4.35%-1983 4.7878%
4.45%-1984
4.55%-1985
4.65%-1986
4.75%-1987
4.80%-1988
4.90%-1989
BANCNORTHWEST Minneapolis 4.25%-1980/82 $395,281 .71 $141,393.92
Cronin & Marcotte, Inc. Minneapolis 4.40%-1983 4.8756%
Northwestern National Bank of Hopkins Hopkins 4.50%-1984
• 4.60%-1985
4.70%-1986
4.80%-1987
4.90%-1988
5.00%-1989
Affiliate of Northwest Bancorporation
ALLISON-WILLIAMS COMPANY Minneapolis 4.40%-1980/82 $396,080.00 $141,975.63
M. H. Novick & Company, Inc. Minneapolis 4.50%-1983 4.8957%
4.60%-1984
4.70%-1985
4.75%-1986
4.80%-1987
4.90%-1988
5.00%-1989
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS Minneapolis 4.50%-1980/83 $395,000.00 $142,893.75
4.60%-1984/85 4.9273%
4.70%-1986
4.80%-1987
4.90%-1988
5.00%-1989
PIPER, JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD, INC. Minneapolis 4.25%-1980/81 $395,032.00 $143,890.50
4.40%-1982 4.9617%
4.50%-1983
4.60%-1984
4.70%-1985
4.80%-1986
4.90%-1987
411
5.00%-1988/89
REOFFERING SCALE
Year Coupon Yield
1980 4.00 4.00
1981 4.10 4.10
1982 4.20 4.20
1983 4.30 4.30
1984 4.40 4.40
1985 4.50 4.50
1986 4.60 4.60
1987 4.60 4.65
1988 4.75 4.75 •
1989 4.75 4.80
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF I.EETING OF THE
S CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOPKINS
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular
meeting of the Council of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, was
duly held at the City Hall in the City of Hopkins , on Tuesday,
November 1, 1977, commencing at 7 : 30 o 'clock p.m.
The following members were present:
Mayor ProTem Milbert, Councilmen McDonald, Slaton and Lohmann
and the following were absent:
Mayor Miller
* * * . * * * * * *
•
The Mayor announced that the meeting was convened for
the consideration of the bids which had been received for the
purchase of $400 , 000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of
1977 , as advertised for sale. The City Clerk presented affidavits
showing publication of notice of sale in the official newspaper,
in Commercial West, and in Finance and Commerce, financial papers
published in Minneapolis , Minnesota, which affidavits were examined
and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file .
The City Clerk presented the sealed bids which had been
received by him prior to the time specified in the notice of sale,
• which were then opened and tabulated. Such bids were as follows :
(see attached)
. G. E Ei4SEN & ASSUCIATi ES, ' '..
• fit n Munic.,:,al finance Consultants
First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612/335 1637
- _
U L T S OF SALE '. $400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS
OF 1977
CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
NOVEMBER 1, 1977 MOODY'S A-1
BIDDERS ADDRESS RATE PRICE NIC
E. J. PRESCOTT, A Division of 4.00%-1980 $396,386.00
$135,79-'�
Carleton D. Beh Co. Minneapolis 4.10%-1981 4.6826•; ` '
4.20%-1982
4.30%-1983
4.40%-1984
4.50%-1985
4.60%-1986/87
4.75%-1988/89
Fla' NATIONAL BANK OF SAINT PAUL St. Paul 4.00%-1980 $396,456.00 $137,657.77
FiNk National Bank of Hopkins Hopkins 4.25%-1981/82 4.7468%
4.35%-1983
4.45%-1984
4.55%-1985
4.65%-1986
4.75%-1987
4.80%-1988/89
DAIN, KALMAN & QUAIL, INC. Minneapolis 4.25%-1980/82 $395,997 .00 $138,848.00.
4.35%-1983
4.45%-1984
4.55%-1985
4.65%-1986 <:
4.75%-1987
4.80%-1988 '
4.90%-1989
BANCNORTHWEST Minneapolis 4.25%-1980/82 $395,281 .71 $141,393.92;.;
Cronin & Marcotte, Inc. Minneapolis 4.40%-1983 4.8756%
Northwestern National Bank of Hopkins Hopkins 4.50%-1984
• 4.60%-1985
4.70%-1986
4.80%-1987
4.90%-1988
5.00%-1989
Mrd.
Affiliate of Northwest ' ..i.„Drporat,on
ALLISON-WILLIAMS COMPANY Minneapolis 4.40%-1980/82 $396,080.00 $141 ,975 .03
M. H. Novick & Company, Inc. Minneapolis 4.50%-1983 4.8957%
4.60%-1984
• 4.70%-1985 w: w
4.75%-1986
4.80%-1987
4.90%-1988
5.00%-1989
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS Minneapolis 4.50%-1980/83 $395,000.00 $142,893.75
4.60%-1984/85 4.9273%
4.70%-1986
4.80%-1987
4.90%-1988
5.00%-1989
PIPER, JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD, INC. Minneapolis 4.25%-1980/81 $395,032.00 $143,890.50
4.40%-1982 4.9617%
4.50%-1983
4.60%-1984
4.70%-1985
4.80%-1986
• 4.90%-1987
5.00%-1988/89
REOFFERING SCALE
Year Coupon Yield
1980 4.00 4.00
1981 4.10 4.10
1982 4.20 4.20
1983 4.30 4.30
1984 4.40 4.40
1985 4.50 4.50
1986 4.60 4.60
1987 4.60 4.65
• 1988
1989 4.75 4.75
4.75 4.80
•
• After due consideration of said bids , Councilmber
Lohmann introduced the following resolution and roved
its adoption:
Resolution No. 77-2639
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $400, 000
GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS OF
1977 , FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS,
DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY, AND
PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT.
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Hopkins,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. The bid of E. J. Prescott
to purchase $400 , 000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 ,
of the City described in the notice of sale thereof is hereby
• found and determined to be the highest and best bid received pursuant
to duly advertised notice of sale and shall be and is hereby accepted,
such bid being to purchase such bonds at a price of $ 396,386.00
plus accrued interest to date of delivery, such bonds to bear interest
as follows : $135,797.75:
1980 4.00% 1985 4.50%
1981 4.10% 1986 4.60%
1982 4.20% 1987 4.60%
1983 4.30% 1988 4.75%
1984 4.40% 1989 4.75%
The City Clerk is directed to retain the good faith check of the
successful bidder pending completion of the sale and delivery of
the bonds. The City Clerk is directed to return the checks of the
unsuccessful bidders forthwith.
• 2 . The City of Hopkins shall forthwith issue and sell
its General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 , in the principal
amount of $400 , 000 dated November 1, 1977 , said bonds being 80 in
number and numbered 1 to 80 , both inclusive, in the denomination of
$5 , 000 each, bearing interest as above set forth, all interest payable
August 1, 1978 , and semiannually thereafter on February 1 and
August 1 in each year , and which bonds mature serially on February 1
in the years and amounts as follows :
• YEAR AMOUNT
1980 $30 , 000
1981 30 , 000
1982 35 , 000
1983 35 , 000
1984 40 , 000
1985 40, 000
1986 45, 000
1987 45 ,000
1988 50 , 000
1989 50, 000
All bonds maturing after February 1, 1987 being subject to redemption
in inverse order of serial numbers on said date and any interest
payment date thereafter at a price of par plus accrued interest.
3. Both principal and interest shall be payable at
American National Bank and Trust Co. Bank of Saint Paul, Minnesota
and the City of Hopkins shall pay the reasonable charges of said
•
bank for its services as paying agent .
4 . The bonds and the interest coupons to be thereto
attached shall be in substantially the following form:
No.
$5 , 000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF r1INNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF HOPKINS
GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BOND OF 1977
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the City of Hopkins ,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, acknowledges itself to be indebted and,
for value received, hereby promises to pay to bearer , the sum of
FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS on the 1st day of August, 19 , and to pay
interest thereon from the date hereof until the principal amount is
paid at the rate of percent ( %) per annum, interest
•
to maturity payable August 1 , 1978 , and semiannually thereafter on the
1st day of February and the 1st day of August in each year in
accordance with and upon presentation and surrender of the interest
coupons hereto attached as they severally become due . Both principal
of and interest on this bond are payable at the
Bank of
in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on
the date of payment is legal tender for public and private debts .
All bonds of this issue maturing after February 1 , 1987 ,
410 are subject to redemption at the option of the City in inverse order
of serial numbers on said date and any interest payment date there-
after, at a price of par plus accrued interest to date of redemption.
This bond is one of an issue of bonds in the total principal
amount of $400, 000, all of like date and tenor except as to maturity,
interest rate, redemption privilege and serial number, all issued by
the City for the purpose of providing money to defray the expenses
incurred and to be incurred in financing a Redevelopment Project,
pursuant to and in full conformity with the Constitution and laws
of the State of Minnesota, including Minnesota Statutes, Section
462. 585, and the home rule charter of the City, and is payable
primarily from tax increments from said Project pursuant to a Tax
Increment Agreement executed by the City and the Housing and Redevelop-
ment Authority of the City of Hopkins on September 30 , 1977 , but
constitutes a general obligation of the City and, to provide moneys
for the prompt and full payment of said principal and interest as the
same become due, the full faith and credit of the City is hereby
irrevocably pledged, and the City Council will levy ad valorem taxes,
if required for such purpose, which taxes may be levied on all of
• the taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or
amount.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that all acts, conditions
and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of
Minnesota and the home rule charter of the City to be done, to
happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this
bond have been done, have happened and have been performed in regular
and due form, time and manner as required by law; and that this bond,
together with all other indebtedness of the City outstanding on the
date hereof and on the date of its actual issuance and delivery does
not exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation thereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Hopkins , Hennepin County,
Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this bond to be executed
by the facsimile signature of the Mayor and the manual signature
of the City Manager and sealed with a facsimile of the corporate seal
of the City, and the interest coupons hereto attached to be executed
and authenticated by the facsimile signatures of said officers, all
as of November 1, 1977 .
• (facsimile)
Mayor
.
_
a. ca L,..
City Manager
(facsimile seal)
(Form of Coupon)
No . $
On the 1st day of August (February) , 19 , the City of
Hopkins, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will pay to bearer, at the
Bank of
the amount shown hereon for interest then due on its General
Obligation Redevelopment Bond of 1977 , dated November 1, 1977, No.
(facsimile signature)
Mayor
(facsimile signature)
City Manager
5 . The City Clerk shall obtain a copy of the proposed
410 approving legal opinion of Messrs . LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O 'Brien
and Drawz of Minneapolis , Minnesota, which shall be complete except as
to dating thereof and shall cause said opinion to be printed on each
bond, together with a certificate to be signed by the facsimile
signature of the City Clerk in substantially the following form:
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a
full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion
executed by the above named attorneys, except as
to the dating thereof, which opinion has been
handed to me for filing in my office prior to the
time of bond delivery.
(facsimile signature)
City Clerk
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to execute such
certificate in the name of the City, upon receipt of such opinion
and to file the opinion in his office .
6 . The bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City
by the facsimile signature of the Mayor and the manual signature
of the City Manager, and the interest coupons shall be executed and
authenticated by the printed facsimile signatures of the Mayor and
City Manager, and the facsimile of the corporate seal of the City
may, but need not be, printed thereon . The bonds when fully
executed, shall be delivered by the City Treasurer to the purchaser
thereof upon receipt of the purchase price, and the said purchaser
ilo shall not be obligated to see to the proper application thereof.
7 . The bonds issued hereunder or additional bonds
similarly authorized and issued shall be payable from the General
Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 Debt Service Fund hereby
created, and the proceeds of general taxes hereinafter levied and
all tax increments from the Program Area in which the Project is
located received by the City from the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority pursuant to the tax increment agreement executed by the
City and the Authority on September 30, 1977 . If any payment of
principal or interest on said bonds shall become due when there is
not sufficient money in said fund to pay the same, the City
Treasurer shall pay such principal or interest from the general fund
of the City and such fund may be reimbursed for such advances out
of proceeds of said tax increments when received.
8 . It is hereby expressly found and determined that the
aforedescribed General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds issued here-
under shall be payable from tax increments received from a redevelop-
", ment project pursuant to the "Tax Increment Agreement" executed by
the City and the Authority on September 30 , 1977, and said tax
increment funds are hereby irrevocably appropriated and pledged to
the Debt Service Fund for said obligations authorized by this
resolution or any additional bonds similarly authorized and issued.
9. It is hereby found and determined that the estimated
tax increments from the Project are sufficient to provide funds
equal to at least 5% in excess of the amount needed to pay principal
and interest when due on said bonds. In order to further secure the
payment of the bonds it is determined to be expedient and desirable
to levy a direct, annual, irrepealable ad valorem tax on all taxable
properties in the City, which tax levy shall be in the years and
amounts as follows: (year stated being year of levy for collection
in the following year)
Levy Levy
YEAR LEVY YEAR LEVY
1978 $50,200 1983 $53,300
1979 49,000 1984 56,600
1980 53,000 1985 54,400
1981 51,400 1986 57,400
410 1982 55,000 1987 55,000
The City Clerk is authorized and directed to annually, prior to
October 10, certify to the County Finance Director of Hennepin County
the amount by which funds on hand from tax increments from the Project
exceed the amount necessary to pay principal and interest on the
bonds in the ensuing year and to request the Finance Director to
reduce or cancel the tax herein levied by that amount pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes , Section 475 . 61, Subdivision 3. The Clerk is
further directed to file a certified copy of the resolution with
the Finance Director of Hennepin County and obtain his certificate
as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475 . 63 .
10 . It is hereby determined that the redevelopment project
financed by these bonds has a relationship to the comprehensive
municipal plan and that these items have been referred to the Planning
Commission under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes , Section 462 . 356 ,
Subdivision 2 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 462 . 515 , and a written
opinion of the planning agency is on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
11. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and
directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the bonds and
to the attorneys approving the same , certified copies of proceedings
• and records of the City relating to said bonds and to the financial
condition and affairs of the City, and such other certificates ,
affidavits and transcripts as may be required to show the facts
within their knowledge or as shown by the books and records in
their custody and under their control, relating to the validity
and marketability of said bonds and such instruments , including any
heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City
as to the facts stated therein.
12 . The Mayor, Clerk and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to certify that they have examined the official
statement or prospectus prepared and circulated in connection with
the issuance and sale of $400, 000 General Obligation Redevelopment
Bonds of 1977 and that to the best of their knowledge and belief
said statement is a complete and accurate representation of the
facts and representations made therein as of the date of said official
statement or prospectus as it relates to the City of Hopkins.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Councilman Slaton , and upon vote
• being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof :
Councilmen McDonald, Slaton, Irohmann & Mayor Pro Tem Milbert.
and the following voted against:
None
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
411 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS.
CITY OF HOPKINS )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting
City Clerk of the City of Hopkins, Minnesota, do hereby certify
that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract
of minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council held on
Tuesday, November 1, 1977, with the original thereof on file in my
office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript there-
from insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale of $400 , 000
• General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds of 1977 of the City.
WITNESS Mly hand as such Clerk and the corporate seal of
the City this 4th day of November , 1977 .
z/;-/PX
City Clerk
City of Hopkins , Minnesota
(SEAL)
•
October 26, 1977
To: Wn. P. Craig, City Manager
From: Chris Nielsen, Finance Director
Subject: Selection of C.P.A. firm to audit City records for 1977.
The time has come where a C.P.A. firm should he selected and confirma-
tion of same obtained from the City Council.
As you know, the firm of Strand & Roe has been doing the audit for
quite a number of years and in my estimation has done an outstanding job.
With the federal programs such as Community Development, Federal Revenue
Sharing, etc., the audit of the City has become quite complex and to go with
a different firm will create a substantial increase in cost.
Therefore, it is my recommendation that the firm of Strand & Roe be
retained to perform the audit for 1977.
Respectfully submitted,
0/t- e./4-'4:;)
Chris Nielsen
Finance Director
CN:dmj
MEMO
October 25, 1977
O
To: City Council and
City Manager
Subject: Parking on 2nd Street So.
Mr. and Mrs. Wilson, 133 - 12th Avenue So., appeared at the October 18,
1977, Council meeting to voice a complaint on a parking condition on 2nd St.
So., adjacent to their home. (See attached letter) . They stated that employees
of nearby businesses are using 2nd St. for all day parking. The letter called
this use "an abuse of public streets and invasion of my family's privacy".
I have observed the parking on 2nd St. So. for the past two weeks and found
that usually 4 cars are parked on the north side of 2nd St. between 12th Avenue
and the alley east of 12th Avenue. This would be along the frontage of the
Wilson property on 2nd St. East of the alley,there are usually 4 to 6 vehicles
and one boat which is chained to the barricade. Some of the vehicles belong to
residents of the adjacent apartment building. (See attached drawing) .
• There are normally 8 to 10 vehicles parked all day on the south side of
2nd St. from 12th Ave. to the barricade. Few if any cars were ever observed
parked west of 12th Avenue on 2nd St. So., or on 12th Avenue in the vicinity of
the Wilson home.
Police Superintendent LaBerge and myself checked the situation on Monday,
October 24th at 1:30 p.m. The normal number of cars were parked on 2nd St. Six
of the cars had a City permit in the window. This permit allows a car to park
in any City owned employee parking lot. CPT Corp., buys 93 permits each month
and 25 to 30 cars are usually parked on the City owned former Burlington Northern
Right-of-Way on the south side of County Road 3. Apparently scan employees find
the on street parking more convenient than the permit lots. Some of the cars
parked in the CPT parking lot have City permits in the window.
Whether this use of a residential street (the area is zoned R-5) is an
"abuse" or "invasion" no doubt could and would be disputed. This situation is
not unique in past and present Hopkins parking history. In this case the parking
is concentrated adjacent to one residence, hence the complaint.
Since employee or all day parking is, and will continue to be, in short supply
in and near the CBD, the adjacent residential streets will probably continue to
•
be used for this purpose unless restricted. As long as the use does not result in
complaints, it is probably a prudent use of these public facilities.
Therefore, Police Supt. LaBerge and myself recommend for Council consideration,
the following parking restrictions:
Two Hour Parking 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except Sunday on the north side of
2nd Street So., between 12th Avenue and the alley east of 11th Avenue.
There is additional space on the south side of 2nd St. South west of 12th Ave. ,
which could be used by the 4 cars which usually park in this section. All vehicles,
residential or employee have to observe these time limits or be subject to a parking
ticket. We will also contact CPT to inform them of the Council action and
request their cooperation in using the employee lot.
The Wilsons also stated that the cars were driving off the edge of the street
and destroying the grass. This could only be prevented by the installation of a
curb along the north side of 2nd Street.
Respectfully submitted,
John J. Strojan
City Engineer
JJS:dmj
Att:
.
I
T
41I*
NW.H* ' * � P * :*.X ; *
Cl) 1 o
\ J 1.
J / N
CD
1 sr Sr. Se .. a)
/ c'o1.
c
O 0 f
+. L r
CO O ••
N I�-t�
i , i
. HAuk
. 1
f L
, ,
• .
Apr. •
T._ 191O ..z ..1. H. .-
•
0 ' _ STA.
" • - ,i 1 H.:- • —
. . E
k )
cpro
J a • • • • i
Q �cST, 5e opo • • • o °
° � � Q
county r
NVir
tiray
Srn. 0IL .
CouA
K t rct-i gni
k
I.
z.
Tu STCA S
• •• Ae- ' CA4
e"'1 — — 111 _ I O- 6'-7�- 16=
1 .._ _ ��
ir
October 19, 1977 '
Applicant: Mr. M. J. Laurel
Location: Lot 2, Block 10, Hobby Acres
Request: That the division of Lot 2 as approved in 1972 be reconfirmed.
Staff Findings and Comments:
1. Lot 2 contains 34,402 sq. ft. and is developed with one single family
detached house. A request was made to the Planning Commission in
November 1972 to aprove the division of Lot 2 into Parcel A with
11,282.24 sq. ft. and Parcel B with 23,120.65 sq. ft. Parcel B being
the location of the existing house and all required yards were in
conformance. At the time the minimum required lot was 10,000 sq. ft.
in the R-1 District, thus parcel A conformed.
• 2. The request for the division was approved and the owner received the
right to record the division and in turn have two building sites.
However, the survey of the division was never filed and during the
ensuing period Ordinance No. 77-427 with appropriate hearings was passed
and is now the law.
• 3. The effect of this change removed Lot 2 from the R-1, 10,000 sq. ft.
minimum lot and placed it in R-1-D, 20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot. Lot 2
conforms but Mr. Laurel has requested an approval of the previous re-
quest to create a parcel with 11,282 sq. ft. Should the division as
approved been recorded and the parcel remained undeveloped to the present
it would not have been a buildable site unless special action of the
Planning Commission and Council occured.--
4. This request is interesting for it is challenging the adopted ordinance
which was passed to provide residential stability and to carry out the
housing policy adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Hopkins has one of
the most successful housing inventories, of style, size, price, type and
ages in the metropolitan area. A part of this success in my opinion is
that the City has recognized that a home is a key element in the life
style of the occupant and by providing for a variety of housing and
caring for each under the zoning ordinance an individual can select and
•
depend upon his selection. Thus, if an individual selects an R-1-D
residential district in which to invest in his home, the individuals
should be able to depend upon the policy of the city to maintain and
protect his or her choice.
5. The size of the lots in the R-1-D residential area are larger than
11,000 sq. ft. . It was the intent for lots in this district to be
larger than 11,000 sq. ft. and it was the intent to preserve the
• general character of that part of Hopkins zone as R-1-D to assure
such a residential choice would be available now and in the future
as a part of Hopkins housing inventory.
•
L
4i ,
w
'V x4C�C co u •
C
NU •. U Q,..
ca > W..� o U CV •
,..t.007...
-.0 .,..•-• C31
ri » { C ..9. a n -0 tl }0oU U.. » ,+ 4 'CN + l �p`Lw wyCN ul r,^ Z yN 1 N l 0 C" N l bb ONO 0 N l
y v,
yy
-Ccc g C C N -J+- ^• N N O{
Or,uu•+C++ NUC
••GC J`.-'-• N 0 pr
0rno - C'-
00 U aOzw y lpyw
• N 0 - l > .c .. l N N-C C y y
O O 1•••• O U CC C » -, l yi .( C yy y
rl w N U C ".••-•••-C C .
M
O Nl7 lo l
I N U
t. -4 >+ 0
CEr -J CN•» N l 0
-tr)
•_ +.CO 0... 0 l C
N 0*.
a+. l N'-' N l E w•.
-'-C O -
v' O r)a
0II v
❑ l9 u•. C
C . E •+ e oN
L• a- Cl+'0N+' r1 q C C
ll*'UNwa ,
0.
l
I.NON N 0 C NNNU' } 7 in 0C L
J 0 iINC. U+'C
ZUw{ N J C NNN
1' y y N 1 w 0 [+•++ N N N 0Up// Wm < N O J vGb
�' r _ N u
rnr L N N{ t.,-.C.
u a' N tl C••' C'•' CNN{ lw'O
u �o .c, N
°a
'mo0 0 ac 0 am
<{ CEwI- � oo _N000-� N oO�u mQNwUN •0 J owl ^ Q =] 7w RN tl 'Anw ,-..0 U+. .O[--c(vuW W w - oNN 0 .=O J 00'•• 1 } Q 0 0C»O n 0 ru -77wO + oi- J W 01--
0.1 w •O W Z Z
(� N >> .0 C-C
Nw
E () e-.
Cl.. N ' 0 Q,--
^UC
+ N 0 NrnOCppO b
Y{ OCuov+ N'» C) N l Nw
C t. N•.- l
O{ 00 {C0'^ NUL
wCo O(,J
0vw N- •»
v>
La CE vO
tl••+N T.
W Z `" - >0
0
+ lx
+'y tl{ 0
UE
0 0>, to 72 U+' Cs Na00L0a 0 Q+' 0
N' 0 N•»O ON
m w•... �+ y u-0 r. .. i CJ NaObLVON
0-0'l't•• l+CtlN} wr �,CU 41 wr.....,0 4-0
-C >
v b
OJ W Z
Z i O
wOUHca
N N Cc yrn- ›..0.-
(N.1
+
cto ' l 0 0
+'»'oN
C�NO vtlCN CO .
.. C l 0 0 N
xO0 +'N+'+- 0
-.w tlwV N w
•» 0
v ? „ Q - O O N N
»C — U >
O t.....: O qLb C Ttl�•
-.I 0-....C1-0 Co C -O Mu O •,lb C Coo-•C
1. ') CO ''C b0
u0 0 C •-•ca-•» NO. NNW 0= +'o e oal
C. 0 v•»0 O NJ> C --u »Nv,tl
00' RL CO
NCU' •C
b0 CUEC "U0+OE U Cl CN 00C
0 0 0 UN{ O C QP-•
C.::",:••{WNUCC + dON .E0
O O 0- O`er d O m Ct....0.p
>OCQm OW N+'
U (1.7"-‘0
N N•-NN
• v > N N l
LI.,) W❑ I )..cw>
O N O ' '
N N JO 4-- 00U 8'3'61041" .0NN•» U-•J 0-0 N N+'
a.
0
NC) W CO J'•'0 l t
Q
a.
0
; •
Q 7 v'
4
k 7 •
W ,
O
ii t
N \
• io �.� : J7�
� h CC
W �`1%s • • � c h
vi
CE
1,7j .M
: vj .•.-\ ti O V0 ij
Li O
,r d.
1....s •
'
•
I �' of/- ._ _,, • 0
ILL
mmi
H ; ,............ ..-.......,,ori... . orril .1.. J
W _ _
4
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
HENNEPIN COUNTY , MINNESOTA
11
- -414::',-) •tr:. r,r—r---,
— rrri r....r -t— r....:,:.)P.T H---- -----a-
.,
.--- I 1€523 RLS No 505)
-765.05 MEAS I -1. 60
rt . N89'35'391
---...
...-.:
.i.---)
,...
.7... ,t.-
‹... •... .....I
.a.
qr 4. LU
,
:
"1 e, .:,
..::' .1. - •
.--.- -4 ‹
• Ct .2-'
f.:•;-;Lu •<,'
-‘:`--Z <-•
.. „..,
5__.
.•
•
.... zz.;:,•2:•:
. ,f,......
III . / 2.T
il..:
/ I 1 .
%.
N
4..
r • :',4 i aiaa
• //....,
'
....a
,,.
....L.; e, TRACT A
N 6
„:11 ‘,..
L
,_. ....., -N. 41
ON :
/
r..) ..?.
..... , H.
17.7:
1."- ''''' /..—„,, •
. LL, '--.4.. . •..1,_, ,..,,,,
t„.... .4. [...:.: ,
(_::: L.) , r.• '1 c'.._ 1
i:: '''.:•; .7., Q., ge‘.....' r
,..., _.-r I • e.-_
IA1 V ev
-,
•et
\<
,‹
•--: -1...
31
^ i I IL.1
60 L.,.
, ! ,,, ":•
118608/88
• L, \ i
_-*. •, ‘r,..).
J
...--,* '. ir• .'O.
•%., b '
2000
"1 ' .....0....r. .4),\ ,ca
..,,,ar,. . 1 B -...liz:060...°0:5 64:(Y.1.(;'11
' ..'"?? c."C ', ,NOC.0.918E .....v:
..,-.;-5,, f stIt... `-'IP 106¢L._—:-•
r
AI, v , .;?.4 ,,,, --c,
..t.Z..-
.2'
7 • •P
-.1.. "A - se-, --
,- V •-•'1'V.....:,
r.!...sxca R:18:8.713-
a 7°2°5ora
c.6.N78.35 3
24 ... __ It1:..C.\, SO
' 01 " •,(','"I'l
, t ...,,C.Ce‘*,,-"
L '
j.,
L.-) f,,, .,), ..i.r.,,,,,,c• 0` •51 „\ ‘ ...."
c."1. ie-, ..?s•••• ' 24 2 77 -
222 50 .....,..
6,8: • :
, • ... 586'38'16 W -584/5-
a" C.' fa, 1-21 ro, , -:, f t".:`,1(-",::t (,=,1,C,FR 1.'\\IC:',......)
op.). Bearings shown ore assumed
• 'co-Denotes iron mon.
SURVEY DIVISION
100 0
DEPARTMENT OF 100 . 200
- ----
.... _ ...
PUBLIC WORKS scale feet
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN.
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
• .
MEMO
October 14, 1977
Tb: Mayor and Council
From: Wm. P. Craig, City Manager
Subject: Experimental plan for snowplowing
Gentlemen:
As you are doubtless aware, certain neighborhoods in Hopkins
present an extremely difficult problem for snow removal crews.
Residents park automobiles and other vehicles upon the street almost
continuously making it extremely difficult to properly plow the snow
and adding to the congestion and snow/ice conditions when the vehicles
finally do move. Some vehicles became inoperable due to the cold
weather and packed snow and sit for long portions of the winter season.
• Several conventional approaches to dealing with this would not be very
well suited to Hopkins. One alternative, used by Edina, would be to
simply ban parking during the night hours so that plows can operate.
Another alternative, would be to ban parking during snowfalls and for
a designated period afterward. Both of the above possible approaches
are limited in Hopkins by the fact that some residents have no location
off the street to place their vehicles and it is unreasonable to attempt
to make them disappear. Another alternative, would be to simply post
one side of the street for "No Parking" during a designated winter season.
This would assure that one lane would be kept clear at all times. Un-
fortunately under Hopkins weather conditions the designated parking lane
would be so full of snow and ice by the end of the season that it would
be virtually unuseable. Consequently, we are suggesting that in certain
limited areas that we try out during the winter of 1977-78, a plan to
clear the very worst streets of snow more rapidly. Mr. Beecher has re-
viewed the worst streets in our experience and they are shown on the
attached map. I would suggest that we consider only a portion of these
for a demonstration in order to compare them with streets where there has
been no change in policy.
The basic scheme is to cause motorists to park on alternate sides of
• the street, depending on the date, during the winter season in certain
specified problem neighborhoods. This would provide a place for people
who have no driveway, garage or alley approach to their residents, and
at the same time, would insure that all motor vehicles were operable.
The method of plowing would be to simply clear the drive lane and the one
parking lane immediately after the snow fall, and then assign an operator
to go around and catch the other side of the street on the following day.
This would enable us to keep the streets clear, curb to curb, throughout
the winter season. I am proposing this for discussion at Council meeting
so that the pros and cons can be explored. I would recommend that we start
this on a limited trial basis this winter so that we can show ourselves ,
and the residents, the practical increase in service level which would re-
sult from this regulation.
Respectfully submitted,
WPC:dmj William P. Craig, City Manager
October 13, 1977
To: Bill Craig, City Manager
From: Ev Beecher, Public Works Operations Director
Subject: Posting of Streets for Cleaning and Snow Plowing
As per our conversation at staff meeting October 12, 1977 on street
cleaning and snow plowing, I would like to propose the following:
Post the streets colored in on the attached
map "No Parking This Side of Street on Odd
or Even Numbered Days - 12 Mid. to 6 P.M.
'Itao sets of signs - one for odd one for even.
410 We would like to try this on a year round basis to facilitate better
and more efficient snow plowing and street sweeping. If these experi-
mental areas work out, we would then like to propose expansion of this
program to include any or all areas of the City where off street park-
ing is not available.
Please note results of a quick survey I made at 7:30 A.M., 10-13-77
on the proposed streets notes on attachment.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
•
•
elMilIMIEMn.
- —-----—h1.----- --------- -.:_—_-,..-...,-- _--7.------:-----:-. / fi 2,-i -_fr
.:
28' 1/,..3% / /-T-
i
..----- 1 c- I-A
— 3
111 1--)
I 1 ----Q-6----3
'1...,• / \ i.,ir .-.---------'-lt I
•••-•'''-'1,-"/
..„....r7----2 ' '--M\ '' I
-..J I. / i
-, LX,e.'.d
, i -- •
-.)4 •- ...• .. __-- "2_ v / z J.- &•-• (
c° -----. ...go.---, ,---__IFsz,5 —....
\ t
__, ---) —
Vt. A / I L
A —--7-—
,..r. _ .T. ._.—
I1i I I /C.; /)' '.",
1
1
i
....: ' i
1 / /ll Y 1/o-4 , 6 4 ‘
•• ,, ,
-, •; 1 . ...
li' 1
1 I ItO1 I .
':• r-C:-------:11
A
_
i•
. ,,. N11......,
• 7Z1171 r- 1 ir ,,,,.,
, ci :i on ..., , , i4 „„ ,., i •
_ _ I
1 Y
a •
1 c 7---7.I:7-rj 7 I I --.0. ' :1111 -On ri i I ' . .4'' -I J," - /7 1 ;...„,....„...„,........,..-•••
• t...„)----i' 1
ici iii ,
" LI LI I'Nli .!iinriF7 ,,,11,,,,,l ':140 -v t . •
, ,
to02-1 \\jw, N . ;L_J
....,„\
I--- -• • - mi ---1
'...\7;1\\-10 I . .10 11 DILI] 0 L UII
..5,0 „. .._ ..:
1 1 -lri.r1., gi hrg-----Url i 1 [
L rigri4,ILIAF , E.2, i I.. ZD; I •'4.
-.-..". I
P 5T 5 Ii ti I LI I
I • ° 1
0. 04010. ‘‘.41. ,f, _ i .ST.. --; •
rinApar-•---4",0 gio.11 1LJ 0 0 1
- ..
I
,., .
. f. . .
. 1
i COUNTY A.." ,-..... t _I
-r- L.....______,,
[
1-- : : 7 r_._.........._..........1
7
......_— it,c., I ,__ 1-
•--
1 , . 1
• 1 ---,. -•_•_
- 1
,,,, .......
:,.... ,..
i • _ i,4. . Z1 ell
1.1.;• CAMCM.,OGE. 57.
. i
,,. ....
I
T..i
,..1
51 5 ,,li
< I.. 51 1 •
} , 1-1.Of]:— \ '.-2.1
I 1, ttir.D. ,i, ... :4 •-T,* ,u Di
> I -
0 ' •,,,
... ,6,---?, I I
.-r - G,:. -------5-r
r- 1---1 5 ...
F,E-. 1 14 '
,ii , , 11: ..„ 0
__. ,..
..,
,___ _.,±_,,,,,_- ,‘..c2.* --__' v ,...,
I5,_...._____
-4• j I,-11 1
..-- c t
. r .
1 .
II
1...1 ..._..i .. __ ._11., ...,. : .
..... , ...;
1 ,
, ,3:rd , I
ft
!: I
.
;II \ --7-=11,----
,.,
I :it e - r--- Ii
, 1
1. 74-0-,„,,Ln- € li
, I ,
_ ,....ili •
:4 I icr,1
_____j i I c, _ _Ii•e_CI ,___,i_ __.„ 5T
I I__Wl ..--h__ _5_1,I
-_,
I L'• LI : .!I
L - 1 _....... *_................` I 005C-5.04.-a x—$1 .. 4 -•i
, .-- - •••-..- --..
_
1511
I
.2 i Ir. .11
a_Ili
•
/0- 3- ? ?
• t.
i F-vQ;c c. ct x vrra
bac c,c >i e � e�"�N` Qd-tit4
QS��C� i�lS`1S b'Y‘ \ -‘&Q& 0c
�c